Fresh Fruit Supply Chain Optimization: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Engineering, Industrial | Mathematics
Contributor:
Tri-Dung Nguyen
,
Tri Nguyen-Quang

The fresh fruit chain has been recognized as a very important and strategic part of the economic development of many countries. The planning framework for production and distribution is highly complex as a result. Mathematical models have been developed over the decades to deal with this complexity. This review focuses on the recent progress in mathematically based decision making to account for uncertainties in the fresh fruit supply chain

  • fresh fruit
  • supply chain
  • mathematical model
  • agricultural supply chain
  • literature review

1. Introduction

1.1. Constraints and Challenges

The fresh fruit supply chain has a relatively long supply lead time, uncertain supply and demand, and a thin profit margin due to competition. These are the challenges that supply chain managers need to confront by improving the efficiency and using modern decision-making tools [1]. In developed countries, where science and technology are better leveraged and crop productivity is high, production is not able to meet demand for several reasons; some of these are a shorter growing season in the North, demand for fruits and vegetables outside their seasons, and skilled labor shortages.
To meet the year-round demand for seasonal vegetables and fruits, most rich countries resort to a high level of imports—in countries such as the US and Canada, up to 50% of fresh fruit is imported [2]. As fresh vegetables and fruits have better nutritional content and taste than preserved fruits/vegetables from past seasons, there is always sufficient demand for importing these internationally. In many developing countries, agriculture mostly follows traditional practices and uses manual labor. This brings unique challenges compared to developed countries which include difficulties in coordination between farmers, cooperatives, traders, wholesalers, distributors and retailers. Other challenges are:
  • The traditional practice of trade is still dominant. With many intermediary stages as well as complex local rules, the food supply chain is longer and logistically more complex than in developed countries.
  • Storage after harvesting and transportation is quite expensive due to a climate with high temperature and humidity.
  • Although the growth of the formal agro-industrial sector has been rapid, the practice of using low paid labor is widespread. Though labor is cheap (and often unskilled), there is a high turnaround. Companies/farms must deal with workforce shortages during busy periods at the beginning and the end of the season when planting and harvesting take place, offering opportunities for workers to quickly change employers for better pay.
  • Communication and the exchange of information between value chain partners in harvesting, preliminary processing, packing, labelling, preserving and transportation is often very poor, as is consumer awareness and the usage of agricultural products.
  • Farmers are the most important factor in the food supply chain. However, most of them cannot set a good price for their products, due to these complex elements and their lack of market information and experience. The price for their products is often determined by traders, although cooperatives and fair trade have emerged through the last 50 years.

1.2. Influencing Elements

The influencing elements on the fresh fruit supply chains can be classified as follows (Figure 1):
Figure 1. Constraints, challenges and influencing elements on the fresh fruit supply chain.
  • Functional areas: this category comprises production, harvest, storage and distribution
  • Purpose of the chain: this category includes the scope of the decisions made: such as harvest planning and optimization.
  • Environmental factors: these include the planting environment with uncertainties and risks (countries with water shortage or natural calamities).
  • Fruit characteristics, such as (1) highly perishable and (2) long shelf life.

1.3. Common Concepts and Dominant Approaches

Several modeling approaches for the fresh fruit supply chain were conceived based on various settings, constraints, challenges and influencing elements (shown in Figure 2):.

Figure 2. Model classification framework for fresh fruit supply chains.

Most papers dealing with FFSC in a deterministic context implement LP or MIP formulations to make tactical and/or operational decisions. Additionally, the agricultural activities such as planting, harvesting and storing are covered more than the others. Besides, almost all authors only consider one kind of fruit as a case study to evaluate their model. Diverse decision-making levels and stages of the FFSC need to be considered more. Monoculture is known to be detrimental to soil health. Thus, future models should deal with polyculture farming and its SC implications.

Traditional deterministic models using linear programming or MIP are generally unable to deal with problems that involve uncertainties or give solutions with a high level of risk. This is particularly true in agricultural with several uncertain factors starting with weather conditions. Stochastic programming and robust programming (both extensions of linear programming) can address uncertainties in the parameters of linear or MIP optimization models for production and logistics planning in agri-food industries.

The L-shaped method is considered an effective tool to solve the stochastic problem. In addition, most of the authors believed that the two-stage stochastic model was a good choice for making tactical and operational decisions. Hence, two-stage stochastic models will still be used to deal with risks and uncertainties in the FFSC. However, new developments in robustness should be considered and applied to support decision making under uncertainty.

In many fresh fruit supply chains, uncertain elements include the time to harvest, quantity for packing, cost for shortage, etc. Such uncertainties can be modelled in ways other than stochastic programming as Fuzzy programming, Simulation and Non-linear programming.

2. Robustness and Limitations of Existing Models

In the general view, the following are the main criteria on which researchers conceive and structure their models for the planning and logistics of the fresh fruit supply chain:
  • Relationship between price and demand
  • Environmental constraints
  • Planting/harvesting times and shipping/transporting factors
  • Operational decision-making styles
The fruit species under consideration were varied but very commonly consumed on a daily basis such as tomatoes, apples, grapes, bananas, etc. However, many tropical fruits were not covered as extensively in the literature.
Figure 3 shows the coverage of the fresh fruit supply chain research in the past, focusing on several common species in the market.
Figure 3. Statistics related to the fresh fruit supply chain research in term of fruit species from 1978–2017.
It can be observed that apples, grapes and tomatoes are the most used in case studies. From the chart in Figure 3, it is noticeable that most cases covered in the literature are perennial fruit or one-year lifetime trees. Meanwhile, fast-growing perennial trees are less considered than one year trees.
Figure 4 shows that most of the papers deal with tactical decisions (17 articles) followed by the operational level (11 articles). Only six articles focused on the strategic decision level. However, the coupled models seemed the most favorite approach in dealing with the fresh fruit supply chain, including 24 articles at different levels for combined decisions, such as strategic—tactical (7 articles) and tactical—operational (17 articles).
Figure 4. Number of model categories in fresh fruit supply chain optimization.
It was observed that all models were based on the well-defined underlying factors such as links, actors, actions, and states. The product is characterized by two types of states: appearance and quality. Appearance states are affected by handling action while the quality states are affected by processing, transportation and storage.
The models in the literature can be viewed from a robustness point of view [3]. The linear programming models include crop growth characteristics, seasonality, weather data, crop growth in order to accurately model yield and the timing of the maturity of fruit. The model such as Hamer’s [4] can also be used several times during a season to update marketing strategy and early warnings of production surpluses or shortfalls. However, linear programming models are limited because they do not consider uncertain parameters. In theory, linear models can be run for a choice of parameters but organizing such sensitivity analyses in a risk/robustness/economic trade-off is a challenge.
The dynamic programming models are useful in incorporating the quality. The process of changing the quality of products was described as one function of the DP model developed by Gigler et al. [5]. In addition, the appearance of the products was also considered in their DP approach to point out the relationship between quality and appearance of the products through the supply chain from farmers to final consumers.
The “machine repair” model suggested by Ampatzidis et al. [6] could be part of a general simulation approach to integrating operation research techniques to improve the total harvest process. It can also be used to model machine harvesting with a fleet of machines to collect, pack and distribute fruits. Consequently, the queuing theory to model waiting time can be logically used for agricultural operations.
Summary of section: This section presented the distribution of papers according to the type of fruit considered and the decision planning levels. Future models should aim to incorporate biological, environmental and economic considerations such as epidemics, climate change, and price fluctuations. Furthermore, more emphasis should be put on fast-growing perennial trees and their fruit production and distribution.

3. Conclusions and Research Perspectives for Future Models

The fresh fruit supply chain, a subcategory of the fresh product supply chain, presents modelling challenges due to inherent random and uncertain factors (such as yield, demand, price). New information technologies associated with robust but affordable computers and high technologies (such as drones and sensors) could allow FFSC managers to monitor real-time crop growth information to develop better harvesting and production plans. Nevertheless, according to our review, there exist three main challenges for FFSC models: (1) the efficiency of the entire FFSC in function of the coordination between different stages; (2) the development of integrated planning models which are capable of acquisitioning data or updating parameters from such high-tech informative systems; and (3) surprisingly, a lack of standardization of all FFSC model outputs and performance metrics is observed. FFSC modelling is an interdisciplinary topic and communication between disciplines should be improved to facilitate model comparisons. These shortcomings can hinder the adoption of modelling tools by practitioners. Besides, social responsibility and changing consumer values will create an increasingly complex business planning environment. Examples of such issues are genetically modified products and organic fresh fruits. The creation of a database of FFSC models, categorized by local and regional factors, would be valuable for modelling practitioners and modelers, allowing for benchmarking to occur.
Sustainable development and sustainability criteria have become extremely controversial since international trade based on economic criteria is seen as increasing green-house gas emissions and creating waste management issues. At the same time, increasing global competition and lower prices are strongly required for efficient management, including well-organized transportation, distribution, and inventory management of fresh fruit. These are essential for profitability and provide additional research opportunities.
All models reviewed are appropriate for the specific context and problems that they deal with. Of all the papers reviewed, the following ones propose integrated models of the supply chain under:
  • deterministic conditions (Hamer, 1994 [4], Munhoz and Morabito [7])
  • stochastic contexts (Bezat-Jarzębowska and Rembisz [8], Ahumada et al. [9])
  • sustainability considerations (Foong et al. [10], Van Der Vorst et al. [11])
  • multiobjective optimization (Cittadini et al. [12], Soto-Silva et al. [13])
  • multistage and multiechelon networks (Darby-Dowman et al. [14], Trivedi et al. [15])
  • comprehensive case studies (Broekmeulen [16], Verdouw et al. [17])
For future models, there are two facts that we cannot ignore: (1) mechanization in all steps of the fresh product supply chain and (2) door-to-door service which is becoming prevalent worldwide, especially in periods of pandemic. Mechanization is a response to the combination of rising labor costs and increased opportunities for rural workers in nonfarming sectors. Information and communication technologies in association with automation systems (data-driven technologies, artificial intelligence, etc.) can replace manual decision making in the traditional farm. FFSC systems then become more complex, requiring higher investment. This creates new opportunities for mathematical modelling. Therefore, there is a strong need for models that include real-time monitoring data, uncertain information, logistics integration and product safety and quality. The extension of current models to incorporate robustness and risk reduction would be extremely useful.
Regarding the door-to-door service, it is becoming prevalent in many Asian countries and the North American market. To meet a client’s specific requirements, the retail and foodservice supply chains must evolve various services, including customs formalities, preparation of space for perishable cargo on transportation means, prioritization of storage at the places of origin and destination. Factors such as temperature, quantity, damaging degrees, sanitary inspections and quality checks are standard and need to be regularly controlled. The big question is how we could insert all these features into current optimization models.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/agriengineering3030034

References

  1. Soto-Silva, W.E.; Nadal-Roig, E.; González-Araya, M.C.; Pla-Aragones, L.M. Operational research models applied to the fresh fruit supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 251, 345–355.
  2. Karp, D. Most of America’s Fruit Is Now Imported. Is That a Bad Thing? The New York Times. 18 March 2018. Available online: (accessed on 15 November 2019).
  3. Monostori, J. Supply chains robustness: Challenges and opportunities. Procedia CIRP 2018, 67, 110–115.
  4. Hamer, P.J. A decision support system for the provision of planting plans for Brussels sprouts. Comput. Electron. Agric. 1994, 11, 97–115.
  5. Gigler, J.K.; Hendrix, E.M.; Heesen, R.A.; van den Hazelkamp, V.G.; Meerdink, G. On optimisation of agri chains by dynamic programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 139, 613–625.
  6. Ampatzidis, Y.G.; Vougioukas, S.G.; Whiting, M.D.; Zhang, Q. Applying the machine repair model to improve efficiency of harvesting fruit. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 120, 25–33.
  7. Munhoz, J.R.; Morabito, R. Optimization approaches to support decision making in the production planning of a citrus company: A Brazilian case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 107, 45–57.
  8. Bezat-Jarzębowska, A.; Rembisz, W. Efficiency-focused economic modeling of competitiveness in the agri-food sector. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 81, 359–365.
  9. Ahumada, O.; Villalobos, J.R.; Mason, A.N. Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty. Agric. Syst. 2012, 112, 17–26.
  10. Foong, S.Z.; Goh, C.K.; Supramaniam, C.V.; Ng, D.K. Input–output optimisation model for sustainable oil palm plantation development. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 17, 31–46.
  11. Van Der Vorst, J.G.; Tromp, S.O.; van der Zee, D.J. Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign; integrated decision making on product quality, sustainability and logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47, 6611–6631.
  12. Cittadini, E.D.; Lubbers, M.; de Ridder, N.; Van Keulen, H.; Claassen, G. Exploring options for farm-level strategic and tactical decision-making in fruit production systems of South Patagonia, Argentina. Agric. Syst. 2008, 98, 189–198.
  13. Soto-Silva, W.E.; González-Araya, M.C.; Oliva-Fernández, M.A.; Plà-Aragonés, L.M. Optimizing fresh food logistics for processing: Application for a large Chilean apple supply chain. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 136, 42–57.
  14. Darby-Dowman, K.; Barker, S.; Audsley, E.; Parsons, D. A two-stage stochastic programming with recourse model for determining robust planting plans in horticulture. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51, 83–89.
  15. Trivedi, A.; Sohal, A.; Joshi, S.; Sharma, M. A two-stage optimization model for tactical planning in fresh fruit supply chains: A case study of Kullu, India. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manag. 2021, 8, 18–28.
  16. Broekmeulen, R.A. Operations management of distribution centers for vegetables and fruits. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1998, 5, 501–508.
  17. Verdouw, C.; Beulens, A.; Trienekens, J.; Wolfert, J. Process modelling in demand-driven supply chains: A reference model for the fruit industry. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 73, 174–187.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback