Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a simple, reproducible and non-invasive technique to assess arterial stiffness. It estimates the velocity of arterial wave propagation to travel a known distance between two anatomic sites within the arterial system [1]. PWV has been established as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and is consequently used for diagnosis and prognosis in patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [2]; however, PWV's significance relies on the fact that arterial stiffness, specially of muscular arteries can be modified by interventions that improve endothelial function such as exercise training, which makes PWV an important tool for cardiovascular risk management [3].
Please provide an accurate concept or description at the top and briefly highlight the importance or benefits for humans.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a simple, reproducible and non-invasive technique to assess arterial stiffness. It estimates the velocity of arterial wave propagation to travel a known distance between two anatomic sites within the arterial system [1]. PWV has been established as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and is consequently used for diagnosis and prognosis in patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [2]; however, PWV's significance relies on the fact that arterial stiffness, specially of muscular arteries can be modified by interventions that improve endothelial function such as exercise training, which makes PWV an important tool for cardiovascular risk management [3].
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is considered the gold standard method for assessing aortic stiffness [4][5]. Arterial stiffness measures, and carotid femoral PWV (cfPWV) in particular, are being included in the routine clinical assessment of patients and within the framework of large-scale clinical studies [4] as new instrumental solutions that allow the PWV assessment, such as photoplethysmography or magnetic resonance emerge [6] (Table 1). Nevertheless, an introduction into clinical practice has not been implemented further due to the fact that there is a lack of established reference values based on a large population and due to the absence of a standardized methodology for PWV assessment [7].
Table 1. Methods used to determine PWV. aPWV: aortic pulse wave velocity; baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; cfPWV: carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; DVP: digital volume pulse; ECG: electrocardiogram; PWV: pulse wave velocity.
Previous meta-analyses have attempted to calculate quantitative estimates of the predictive value of PWV for different outcomes. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous meta-analysis has estimated the predictive performance (diagnostic odds ratio (dOR), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR)) of PWV considering the thresholds for a higher risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality estimated using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models. Moreover, reference values for PWV have been established through cross-sectional studies [7] or expert consensus [8], in which subjects by age and blood pressure categories with no additional identified cardiovascular risk factors were considered.
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jcm9072080