r SeIntroduction

The need for high-quality gas sensor development is increasing for the detection of various environmental pollutants that have an adverse effect on humans, animals, and plants. Over the past few years, atmospheric pollutants are being produced as a continuous growth of industries, deforestation, and burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, CO2 is one of the main causes of global warming and climate change. Moreover, CO2 gas is also attracting the serious attention of researchers in various fields such as CO2 storage, capture, and utilization. The level of CO2 in the atmosphere is unacceptably increasing day by day [1]. T
Novel materials, such as amino-ZnO [13], Ru@WS2 [14], vanadium oxide [15], nanodiamonds [16], Al/maPsi/n-Si/Al [17], and carbon nanotube [18], have been recently explored for CO2 gas sensing at room temperature. However, the sensing thin films of these materials require a mild thermal treatment before sensing at room temperature. In addition, the gas sensors based on these materials have realized the longer recovery time (2–6 min). Besides these materials, graphene and its hybrids [15,19–21,67] are emerging as the promising contender for CO2 detection at room temperature due to their extraordinary properties such as high surface to volume ratio, high conductivity, and high chemical reactivity [22]. Owing to its very high volume–exposure ratio, a small amount of the graphene-based material enriched with the high surface area can provide ample active sites for high adsorption of the analyte gas molecules [23,24,68]. The derivative of graphene—reduced graphene oxide (rGO)—has also attracted much research attention in various application including catalysts [25], bio/gas sensors [26,27], electronic devices, and transparent electrodes [28], due to its facile implementation and outstanding properties such as hydrophilic nature, low-cost production, tunable optical band gap, and large surface area with high catalytic reactivity.
Various methods have been investigated to reduce the GO for CO2 gas detection at room temperature, such as thermal reduction [15], exfoliation [29], spray pyrolysis technique [30], and the hydrogen plasma technique [31]. However, these methods need a high temperature for the reduction of GO and its mass production is limited. On the contrary, the chemically reduced graphene requires low temperature for the reduction of GO and it is suitable for mass production [32]. Moreover, the chemical reduction of GO offers the ease of surface modification and the functionalization of graphene oxide. The GO contains several oxygen functional groups (OFGs), such as the carboxyls, carbonyls, epoxides, and hydroxyls, which are covalently or non-covalently bonded in the form of hydrogen bonds and - bonds on its edge and basal plane [33,34]. The OFGs at the rGO surface is the dominant factor for analyte gas molecule adsorption at room temperature. These OFGs cause disruption to the – network that manifests as defects in the graphene sheet [35,36]. The pi–pi conjugate network of sp2 hybridized carbon structure and the sheet conductivity are restored when the OFGs are released from the GO sheet during the reduction process [37]. The OFGs can be efficiently tailored by the chemical reduction method. During the reduction of GO, the key interests are (i) the fraction of OFGs are involved during the reduction process, (ii) how many functional groups are leaving the surface, (iii) how many functional groups remain at the edge plane, and basal plane, and (iv) the formation of defects on the edge or basal plane when the OFGs leave the GO surface. Although both edge and basal plane OFGs take part in the molecule adsorption, the edge plane OFGs dominates. The basal plane OFGs (hydroxyl) work as the surface trap sites for the charge carriers (electrons and holes) [38]. Due to the basal plane trap sites, high-temperature annealing is required to achieve the desorption of gas molecules [39]. For the fast CO2 gas detection at room temperature, the edge functionalities are favorable as compared to the basal plane functionalities. The amount of OFGs at the edge plane and basal plane can be modified by changing the synthesis parameters such as synthesis duration, temperature, the type, and concentration of the reducing agent [40]. 

Graphene Derivatives-

Graphene derivatives like reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are chemically synthesized by using various reducing agents such as ascorbic acid and hydrazine. Figure 1 depicts a representation of the reduction process of GO using Ascorbic acid (AA) and the formation of AArGO materials with different amounts of OFGs. In graphene oxide, the OFGs are attached between the graphene layers, at the edges, and the surface of graphene. When GO is chemically reduced, the AA interacts with these OFGs. AA reduces mainly the basal plane functional groups such as hydroxyls and epoxides [40,42]. The OFGs such as hydroxyls and epoxides are mainly fastened at the basal plane whereas the other OFGs such as carboxyls and carbonyls are dominant functional groups at the edges [34]. The existence of the carbonyl and carboxyl edge functionalities assures the presence of more active sites for the sorption of the analyte gas like CO2. However, in the case of GO (before the reduction), these OFGs do not behave as active sites because these covalently bonded OFGs are hard to detach from the GO surface at room temperature until an external excitation like thermal treatment is provided [45]. Furthermore, these edge functionalities majorly contribute to the high stability and low tendency of agglomerations in the AArGO [46]. The dispersion of edge functionalized graphene is better than basal plane functionalized graphene. Carbonyl and carboxyl OFGs contribute to better dispersion properties of the material [40]. 

Figure 1 Representation of oxygen functional groups (OFGs) after the reduction of graphene oxide using ascorbic acid. Graphene oxide (A), AArGO25 (B), AArGO50 (C), AArGO100 (D).

FTIR Analysis
The structural properties of GO and rGO samples have been studied by using FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of GO (A), AArGO25 (B), AArGO50 (C), and AArGO100 (D). The essential absorption peaks are tabulated in Table 1. The GO spectrum shows a broad absorption band centered at 3182 cm?1 attributed to the –OH stretching vibration and indicating the presence of –OH and –COOH functional groups within the structure. This band is related to the absorbed and inhibited water molecule to atmospheric moisture. The peaks at 1724, and 1620 cm?1 were observed suggesting the vibrations of C=O stretching, and C=C alkene group stretching. Some other peaks at 1225 and 1044 cm-1
were also observed indicating the C–O stretching of epoxy groups and C–O stretching vibration of an alkoxy group, respectively. In the AArGO spectra, it was noticed that the peak intensity of most of the oxygens functional group (OFGs) was found to be decreased that indicates the successful reduction of graphene oxide by AA reducing agent. It was also observed that the peaks due to the hydroxyl group were absent ~3182 cm-1 in all the AArGO samples but the emergence of the absorption peak at ~1580 cm?1 (the aromatic structure) indicates the successful deoxygenation of the rGOs by AA [44].

Surface Morphology
To investigate the morphology of the rGO sample, the SEM and TEM characterizations were carried out. The morphology of AArGO25 investigated using SEM and TEM is shown in Figure 3. The AArGO25 was found to have a pleated surface as shown in the SEM image (Figure 3a). Several corrugations and wrinkles were also observed on the high magnification SEM image of the surface as presented in Figure 3b. Figure 3c illustrates the AArGO25 surface on the holey copper grid during TEM imaging. The surface was found to be a continuous thin layer. Some folds and wrinkles were also identified on edge of the surface. These corrugations on the AArGO25 surface can modify its electronic structure, mechanical, optical, and chemical properties [22,27]. The formation and the effect of wrinkles on the AArGO surface are illustrated in Figure 3d. The wrinkles are formed due to the interaction between substrate and graphene mainly caused by the difference between Young’s moduli of substrate and graphene [53,54].

Figure 3 SEM of AArGO25 at (a) lower magnification and, (b) higher magnification, (c) TEM image, (d) Schematic illustration of wrinkles on AArGO25 surface.

XPS Analysis
The chemical composition and elemental analysis for the GO and AArGO25 were investigated using XPS-C1s spectra as illustrated in Figure 4.  After deconvolution, the C1s spectrum of GO showed four major peaks that correspond to C–C/C=C (285.8 eV, ~27.9%) in aromatic rings, C–O epoxy and alkoxy (287.9 eV, ~34.3%), C–O–C (289.21 eV, ~5.75%), and C=O double bond (290.4 eV, ~0.53%) as depicted in Figure 4a. The reduction of GO mainly affected the C–C/C=C bond and the intensity of C–C/C=C peak was dramatically increased from 27.9% (GO) to 33.35% in AArGO25 as illustrated in Figure 4b, indicating a high removal rate of the epoxide and hydroxyl (C–O) groups and abundance of edge functionalities. These changes in OFGs lead to the enhanced dispersion stability of AArGO25 material [46]. A similar observation on the reduction of hydroxides was found during the FTIR analysis of AArGO25. The peak intensity of the AArGO25 carbonyl group (C=O) was found to be higher than that of GO, attributing to a higher number of carbonyl elements of the AArGO25 material. These carbonyl OFGs form the defective surface of AArGO25 [22]. These defects are the main active sites for the adsorption of the CO2 gas molecules. In addition, the C/O ratio was also slightly increased from 2.17 (GO) to 2.44 (AArGO25), reflecting the reduction of GO with an abundance of OFGs. Additionally, FWHM (full width at half maximum) value was found to be 1.52 and 1.33 for GO and AArGO25, respectively. The smaller FWHM value for AArGO25 suggests its good electrical conductivity with a large number of holes [40]. These holes are formed by the breaking of C–C bonds in the basal plane and interactions between the neighboring hydroxyl and epoxy groups during the reduction process [22,55].

Figure 5. C1s and O1s XPS spectra of GO and AArGO25 thin films. C1s spectra of (a) GO and (b) AArGO25. O1s spectra of (c) GO and (d) AArGO25.

Moreover, the analysis of the high-resolution O1s spectra was performed to get considerable information on sorption. The O1s spectra of GO and AArGO25 are shown in Figure 4c,d, respectively. The O1s spectrum of GO decomposed in three peaks associated with C–O (~533.6 eV), C=O (~533.0 eV), and O–C=OH (~533.2 eV) as shown in Figure 4c, whereas these three major peaks for AArGO25 were found to be ~534.9 eV, ~534. 2 eV, and ~531.7 eV, respectively. The observed significant reduction in the binding energy of the C–O group for AArGO25 is found to be agreed with the trend observed by Chen et al. [40], Rabchinskii et al. [44]. Furthermore, the amount of oxygen in AArGO25 was reduced from 31.47% (GO) to 29.08%, indicating the reduction of GO.

The functionalized graphene has high potential in the field of gas/vapor sensing, biosensing, supercapacitors, water treatment, CO2 utilization, CO2 capture, and sequestration. By changing the surface properties of chemically reduced graphene is a promising technology for future applications.

The entry is from  10.3390/nano11030623 

References
1. Azuma, K.; Kagi, N.; Yanagi, U.; Osawa, H. Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 51–56.
2. Daud, A.I.; Wahid, K.A.A.; Khairul, W.M. Room-temperature operated cyano-terminated ethynylated-thiourea as a resistive-type carbon dioxide (CO2) gas sensor. Org. Electron. 2019, 70, 32–41.
3. Kumar, V.; Roy, D.R. Single-layer stanane as potential gas sensor for NO2, SO2, CO2 and NH3 under DFT investigation. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2019, 110, 100–106.
4. Triyana, K.; Rianjanu, A.; Nugroho, D.B.; As’ari, A.H.; Kusumaatmaja, A.; Roto, R.; Suryana, R.; Wasisto, H.S. A highly sensitive safrole sensor based on polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) nanofiber-coated QCM. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12.
5. Muckley, E.S.; Aytug, T.; Mayes, R.; Lupini, A.R.; Carrillo, J.Y.; Goswami, M.; Sumpter, B.G.; Ivanov, I.N. Hierarchical TiO2:Cu2O Nanostructures for Gas/Vapor Sensing and CO2 Sequestration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 48466–48475.
6. Tchalala, M.R.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Adil, K.; Chappanda, K.N.; Cadiau, A.; Bhatt, P.M.; Salama, K.N.; Eddaoudi, M. Concurrent Sensing of CO2 and H2O from Air Using Ultramicroporous Fluorinated Metal-Organic Frameworks: Effect of Transduction Mechanism on the Sensing Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 1706–1712. 
7. Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, L.; Shi, C.; Qin, H.; Hu, J. CO2-sensing properties and mechanism of nano-SnO2 thick-film sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 227, 73–84. 
8. Hsu, K.C.; Fang, T.H.; Hsiao, Y.J.; Chan, C.A. Highly response CO2 gas sensor based on Au-La2O3 doped SnO2 nanofibers. Mater. Lett. 2020, 261, 127144. 
9. Kanaparthi, S.; Singh, S.G. Chemiresistive Sensor Based on Zinc Oxide Nanoflakes for CO2 Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 700–706. 
10. Tanvir, N.B.; Yurchenko, O.; Laubender, E.; Pohle, R.; Sicard, O.V.; Urban, G. Zinc peroxide combustion promoter in preparation of CuO layers for conductometric CO2 sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 1027–1034. 
11. Mandayo, G.G.; González, F.; Rivas, I.; Ayerdi, I.; Herrán, J. BaTiO3-CuO sputtered thin film for carbon dioxide detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 118, 305–310.
12. Basyooni, M.A.; Zaki, S.E.; Ertugrul, S.; Yilmaz, M.; Eker, Y.R. Fast response of CO2 room temperature gas sensor based on Mixed-Valence Phases in molybdenum and Tungsten Oxide nanostructured thin films. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 9839–9853. 
13. Mandal, B. -Conjugated Amine?ZnO Nanohybrids for the Selective Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 6912–6921. 
14. Rathi, K.; Pal, K. Ruthenium decorated tungsten disulfide quantum dots for CO2 gas sensor. Nanotechnology 2019, 31, 135502. 

15. Zaki, S.E.; Basyooni, M.A.; Shaban, M.; Rabia, M.; Eker, Y.R.; Attia, G.F.; Yilmaz, M.; Ahmed, A.M. Role of oxygen vacancies in vanadium oxide and oxygen functional groups in graphene oxide for room temperature CO2 gas sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 294, 17–24. 
16. Varga, M.; Laposa, A.; Kulha, P.; Kroutil, J.; Husak, M.; Kromka, A. Quartz crystal microbalance gas sensor with nanocrystalline diamond sensitive layer. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 2015, 252, 2591–2597. [CrossRef]
17. Alwan, A.M.; Hashim, D.A.; Jawad, M.F. CO2 gas sensor based on macro porous silicon modified with trimetallic nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 7301–7313. [CrossRef]
18. Young, S.-J.; Lin, Z.-D. Sensing Performance of Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensors with Carbon Nanotubes on Plastic Substrate. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 72–74. [CrossRef]
19. Nemade, K.R.; Waghuley, S.A. Role of defects concentration on optical and carbon dioxide gas sensing properties of Sb2O3/graphene composites. Opt. Mater. (Amst.) 2014, 36, 712–716. [CrossRef]
20. Kim, J.H.; Mirzaei, A.; Zheng, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Enhancement of H2S sensing performance of p-CuO nanofibers by loading p-reduced graphene oxide nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 281, 453–461. [CrossRef]
21. Seekaew, Y.;Wongchoosuk, C. A novel graphene-based electroluminescent gas sensor for carbon dioxide detection. Appl. Surf.
Sci. 2019, 479, 525–531. [CrossRef]
22. Jin, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Podkolzin, S.G.; Lee,W. Band gap of reduced graphene oxide tuned by controlling functional groups. J. Mater.
Chem. C 2020, 8, 4885–4894. [CrossRef]
23. Guo, L.; Hao, Y.W.; Li, P.L.; Song, J.F.; Yang, R.Z.; Fu, X.Y.; Xie, S.Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.L. Improved NO2 Gas Sensing Properties of
Graphene Oxide Reduced by Two-beam-laser Interference. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Van Quang, V.; Hung, V.N.; Tuan, L.A.; Phan, V.N.; Huy, T.Q.; Van Quy, N. Graphene-coated quartz crystal microbalance for
detection of volatile organic compounds at room temperature. Thin Solid Films 2014, 568, 6–12. [CrossRef]
25. Singh, P.; Nath, P.; Arun, R.K.; Mandal, S.; Chanda, N. Novel synthesis of a mixed Cu/CuO-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite
with enhanced peroxidase-like catalytic activity for easy detection of glutathione in solution and using a paper strip. RSC
Adv. 2016, 6, 92729–92738. [CrossRef]
26. Georgakilas, V.; Tiwari, J.N.; Kemp, K.C.; Perman, J.A.; Bourlinos, A.B.; Kim, K.S.; Zboril, R. Noncovalent Functionalization of
Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Materials, Biosensing, Catalytic, and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116,
5464–5519. [CrossRef]
27. Manna, B.; Raha, H.; Chakrabarti, I.; Guha, P.K. Selective reduction of oxygen functional groups to improve the response
characteristics of graphene oxide-based formaldehyde sensor device: A first principle study. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65,
5045–5052. [CrossRef]
28. Kumar, P.; Lin, K.; Seng,W.; Shuaib, M.; Saheed, M. Hybrid film of single-layer graphene and carbon nanotube as transparent
conductive electrode for organic light emitting diode. Synth. Met. 2019, 257, 116186. [CrossRef]
29. Mishra, A.K.; Ramaprabhu, S. Carbon dioxide adsorption in graphene sheets. AIP Adv. 2011, 1, 032152. [CrossRef]
30. Shaban, M.; Ali, S.; Rabia, M. Design and application of nanoporous graphene oxide film for CO2, H2, and C2H2 gases sensing. J.
Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4510–4520. [CrossRef]
31. Muhammad Hafiz, S.; Ritikos, R.; Whitcher, T.J.; Razib, N.M.; Bien, D.C.S.; Chanlek, N.; Nakajima, H.; Saisopa, T.; Songsiriritthigul,
P.; Huang, N.M.; et al. A practical carbon dioxide gas sensor using room-temperature hydrogen plasma reduced graphene oxide.
Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 193, 692–700. [CrossRef]
32. Hou, D.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, H.; Li, K. Graphene synthesis via chemical reduction of graphene oxide using lemon extract. J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 6518–6523. [CrossRef]
33. Yang, H.; Li, J.S.; Zeng, X. Correlation between molecular structure and interfacial properties of edge or basal plane modified
graphene oxide. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 2763–2773. [CrossRef]
34. Yamamoto, S.; Takeuchi, K.; Hamamoto, Y.; Liu, R.-Y.; Shiozawa, Y.; Koitaya, T.; Someya, T.; Tashima, K.; Fukidome, H.;
Mukai, O.; et al. Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on oxygen-functionalized epitaxial graphene surface at near-ambient conditions.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 19532–19538. [CrossRef]
35. Cooper, D.R.; D’Anjou, B.; Ghattamaneni, N.; Harack, B.; Hilke, M.; Horth, A.; Majlis, N.; Massicotte, M.; Vandsburger, L.;
Whiteway, E.; et al. Experimental Review of Graphene. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. 2012, 2012, 501686. [CrossRef]
36. Sundaram, R.S.; Kwan, Y.C.G.; Ng, G.M.; Huan, C.H.A.; Huang, H.H.; De Silva, K.K.H.; Kumara, G.R.A.; Yoshimura, M.; He, L.;
Zhao, Y.; et al. Identification of functional groups and determination of carboxyl formation temperature in graphene oxide using
the XPS O1s spectrum. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12053–12061.
37. Bhaumik, A.; Haque, A.; Taufique, M.; Karnati, P.; Patel, R.; Nath, M.; Ghosh, K. Reduced Graphene Oxide Thin Films with Very
Large Charge Carrier Mobility Using Pulsed Laser Deposition. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 6, 1–11. [CrossRef]
38. Haneef, H.F.; Zeidell, A.M.; Jurchescu, O.D. Charge carrier traps in organic semiconductors: A review on the underlying physics
and impact on electronic devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 759–787. [CrossRef]
39. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Luo, W.; Yang, H.; He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Peng, G. Study on adsorption and desorption of ammonia on
graphene. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Chen, C.; Chen, Y.C.; Hong, Y.T.; Lee, T.W.; Huang, J.F. Facile fabrication of ascorbic acid reduced graphene oxide-modified
electrodes toward electroanalytical determination of sulfamethoxazole in aqueous environments. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 352, 188–197.

41. Aunkor, M.T.H.; Mahbubul, I.M.; Saidur, R.; Metselaar, H.S.C. The green reduction of graphene oxide. RSC Adv. 2016, 6,
27807–27825. [CrossRef]
42. Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Shen, G.; Cheng, P. Reduction of graphene oxide via L-ascorbic acid. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1112–1114.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Wang, F.; Jia, Z.; Su,W.; Shang, Y.;Wang, Z.L. Adsorption of phenanthrene and 1-naphthol to graphene oxide and L -ascorbicacid-
reduced graphene oxide: Effects of pH and surfactants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 11062–11073. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
44. Rabchinskii, M.K.; Dideikin, A.T.; Kirilenko, D.A.; Baidakova, M.V.; Shnitov, V.V.; Roth, F.; Konyakhin, S.V.; Besedina, N.A.;
Pavlov, S.I.; Kuricyn, R.A.; et al. Facile reduction of graphene oxide suspensions and films using glass wafers. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8,
1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Eigler, S.; Hirsch, A. Controlled Functionalization of Graphene by Oxo-addends. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2019, 2, 1–24.
46. Shih, C.J.; Lin, S.; Sharma, R.; Strano, M.S.; Blankschtein, D. Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide
aqueous solutions: A comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir 2012, 28, 235–241. [CrossRef]
47. Sundaram, R.S. Chemically derived graphene. In Graphene: Properties, Preparation, Characterisation and Devices; Woodhead
Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 50–80.
48. Huang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, J. Physical Properties and Device Applications of Graphene Oxide. Front. Phys. 2019, 15, 33301.
[CrossRef]
49. Pimenta, M.A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Cançado, L.G.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying disorder in graphite-based systems
by Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1276–1291. [CrossRef]
50. Gayathri, S.; Jayabal, P.; Kottaisamy, M.; Ramakrishnan, V. Synthesis of few layer graphene by direct exfoliation of graphite and a
Raman spectroscopic study. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 027116. [CrossRef]
51. Ma, B.; Rodriguez, R.D.; Ruban, A.; Pavlov, S.; Sheremet, E. The correlation between electrical conductivity and second-order
Raman modes of laser-reduced graphene oxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 10125–10134. [CrossRef]
52. Kaniyoor, A.; Ramaprabhu, S. A Raman spectroscopic investigation of graphite oxide derived graphene. AIP Adv. 2012, 2, 032183.
[CrossRef]
53. Lee, W.K.; Kang, J.; Chen, K.S.; Engel, C.J.; Jung, W.B.; Rhee, D.; Hersam, M.C.; Odom, T.W. Multiscale, Hierarchical Patterning of
Graphene by Conformal Wrinkling. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 7121–7127. [CrossRef]
54. Huang, H.H.; De Silva, K.K.H.; Kumara, G.R.A.; Yoshimura, M. Structural Evolution of Hydrothermally Derived Reduced
Graphene Oxide. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2–10. [CrossRef]
55. Bagri, A.; Grantab, R.; Medhekar, N.V.; Shenoy, V.B. Stability and formation mechanisms of carbonyl- and hydroxyl-decorated
holes in graphene oxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 12053–12061. [CrossRef]
56. Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lacey, S.D.; Xu, L.; Xie, H.; Li, T.; Danner, V.A.; Hu, L. Reduced graphene oxide film with record-high
conductivity and mobility. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 186–192. [CrossRef]
57. Savchak, M.; Borodinov, N.; Burtovyy, R.; Anayee, M.; Hu, K.; Ma, R.; Grant, A.; Li, H.; Cutshall, D.B.; Wen, Y.; et al. Highly
Conductive and Transparent Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanoscale Films via Thermal Conversion of Polymer-Encapsulated
Graphene Oxide Sheets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 3975–3985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Ren, J.;Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Carey, T.; Chen, K.; Yin, Y.; Torrisi, F. Environmentally-friendly conductive cotton fabric as flexible
strain sensor based on hot press reduced graphene oxide. Carbon N. Y. 2017, 111, 622–630. [CrossRef]
59. Makumi, S.W. Determination of Electrical and Gas sensitivity Properties of Graphene Sheets; Uppsala Universitet: Uppsala, Sweden,
2015.
60. Minitha, C.R.; Anithaa, V.S.; Subramaniam, V.; Rajendra Kumar, R.T. Impact of Oxygen Functional Groups on Reduced Graphene
Oxide-Based Sensors for Ammonia and Toluene Detection at Room Temperature. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 4105–4112. [CrossRef]
61. Vashist, S.K.; Vashist, P. Recent advances in quartz crystal microbalance-based sensors. J. Sens. 2011, 2011, 571405. [CrossRef]
62. Lu, G.; Ocola, L.E.; Chen, J. Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445502.
[CrossRef]
63. Li, R.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, M.; Gong, Z.; Guo, Y.;Wu, F.; Li,W.; Ding,W. Influence of Charge Carriers Concentration and Mobility on
the Gas Sensing Behavior of Tin Dioxide Thin Films. Coatings 2019, 9, 591. [CrossRef]
64. Rodríguez-García, S.; Santiago, R.; López-Díaz, D.; Merchán, M.D.; Velázquez, M.M.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Palomar, J. Role of the
Structure of Graphene Oxide Sheets on the CO2 Adsorption Properties of Nanocomposites Based on Graphene Oxide and
Polyaniline or Fe3O4-Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12464–12473. [CrossRef]
65. Berouaken, M.; Talbi, L.; Alkama, R.; Sam, S.; Menari, H.; Chebout, K.; Manseri, A.; Boucheham, A.; Gabouze, N. Quartz Crystal
Microbalance Coated with Vanadium Oxide Thin Film for CO2 Gas Sensor at Room Temperature. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 43,
5957–5963. [CrossRef]
66. Ahmad, Z.; Naseem; Manzoor, S.; Talib, M.; Islam, S.S.; Mishra, P. Self-standing MWCNTs based gas sensor for detection of environmental limit of CO2. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2020, 255, 114528. 
67. Kumar, P.; C. H. Kang, Z. A. Burhanudin, M. S. M. Saheed, M. I. Irshad and N. M. Mohamed, Graphene-based hybrid thin films as transparent conductive electrode for optoelectronic devices. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE), 2016, pp. 216-219.

68. Kumar, P.; L. H. Chee, C. H. Kang, Z. A. Burhanudin and M. S. B. M. Saheed, "Au-decorated graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid thin film for sub-100 ohm/sq transparent conductive electrodes," TENCON 2017 - 2017 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2017, pp. 1661-1665.