Here, we examine potential changes caused by climate change in the central North American and Great Lakes region of North America. This region includes boreal forests of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lambert), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) Britton, Sterns and Poggenb.), white spruce (P. glauca (Moench) Voss), balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), red pine (Pinus resinosa Aiton), quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), and paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.). To the south and east (northeastern Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, USA, and parts of Ontario, Canada), lie temperate forests of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), red maple (A. rubrum L.), hemlock (Tsuga Canadensis (L.) Carr.), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton), beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.), northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.), American basswood (Tilia Americana L.) and white pine (Pinus strobus L.). To the south and west (northwestern Minnesota and westward across Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Canada) lie oak savannas with bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa Michx.) and northern pin oak (Q. ellipsoidalis E.J. Hill), and/or quaking aspen parklands, and prairies that have mostly been converted to agricultural fields.
2. Mechanisms Transforming Boreal Forest Vegetation in a Warming Climate
M1. Gradual replacement of boreal trees by temperate trees through gap dynamics. The increase in temperate species would occur over several decades so that they replace boreal tree species through gap-phase replacements as individual boreal trees die of old age [
19,
20]. Although this was not occurring in the study region during the 1950s [
21], it has started to occur between 2010 and 2020, due to warming that has already happened (, [
22]). Two changes in temperature could allow this to occur. First, summers are now warmer in locations where in the past cool summer temperatures and abbreviated length of the warm season limited the growth of temperate tree species and made them less competitive. Recent studies of understory sapling abundance and growth across a summer temperature gradient in the Great Lakes region have shown that temperate tree species are expanding into nearby boreal stands and that this expansion is related to warmer summer temperatures in recent years (, [
22,
23]). These observational findings are corroborated by experiments in which field plots in the temperate-boreal ecotone with planted seedlings were artificially warmed, resulting in increasing growth rates of temperate seedlings and decreasing growth rates of boreal seedlings [
24]. Second, extreme winter minimum temperatures, which were historically lethal to temperate tree species, are rare in the region (<−42 to −44 °C, [
25]). ‘Summer boreal’ and ‘winter boreal’ forests (where temperate tree species were previously kept out by cool summers or winter minimum temperature, respectively) would thus be affected by different aspects of the changing temperature regime. We note that many temperate tree species have historically been present in the region, but at low numbers and frequencies (e.g., red maple, bur oak, northern red oak, yellow birch), while the northern range limits of many other temperate species lie to the south and would need to migrate into the region from elsewhere.
Figure 1. Sugar maple saplings (right) within a boreal balsam fir forest in northern Wisconsin USA. Balsam fir saplings on left. Photo by Lee Frelich.
Figure 2. Height growth of understory saplings across a range of regional mean summer temperatures in ecotonal mixed temperate-boreal forest in northern Minnesota, USA. After [
23].
M2. Sudden replacement of boreal overstory trees after gradual understory invasion by temperate tree species. In boreal stands with an established temperate understory, for example red maple under boreal spruce-fir-birch-aspen forests (), a large event that kills larger boreal trees, releasing the temperate understory, would lead to a rapid transition rather than a gradual transition as in M1. This would occur at medium spatial extents when derechos (straight-line wind events associated with severe thunderstorms) level the canopy over 10 s to 1000 s of km
2. Such storms are expected to become more common as the climate warms [
26]. Windstorms commonly kill large trees, while leaving most saplings alive [
27]. This is a well-known mechanism termed disturbance-mediated accelerated succession [
28]. Usually this simply accelerates the normal successional process from shade-intolerant mature trees to shade-tolerant understory trees within a single biome (e.g., paper birch to spruce and fir in the boreal forest, or to hemlock and sugar maple in the temperate forest). However, in the context of a warming climate along the southern boundary of the boreal forest, combined with the observed increased abundance of temperate saplings in the understory [
22], the mechanism could cause biome conversion.
Figure 3. A boreal paper birch, aspen, white spruce and balsam fir forest in northern Minnesota with red maple (red foliage in this autumn picture) in the understory. Photo by Dave Hansen.
M3. Trophic cascades causing delayed invasion by temperate species, followed by moderately sudden change from boreal to temperate forest. This is similar to M1, but large herbivores cause delays in establishment of shade-tolerant temperate tree species in boreal forest understories. The two large herbivores in the region, moose (
Alces alces L.) and white-tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus Zimmerman), prefer to eat seedlings of temperate species (sugar maple, red maple, northern red oak, yellow birch and hemlock, ), more than boreal species (spruce, fir and pine, [
29]). White-tailed deer can also change the growth rates of temperate and boreal tree saplings relative to each other, raising the threshold temperature at which temperate trees can replace boreal trees [
23]. The consumption of temperate seedlings in nearby boreal stands thus prevents establishment of a temperate understory until either the boreal trees die of old age or the climate becomes so warm that it exceeds the tolerance of boreal trees, which then die without having a temperate understory in place. At some point during decline in the boreal overstory, understory light levels become high enough so that seedlings of temperate tree species can outgrow the impacts of large herbivores [
30], causing a change that is somewhat faster than in M1.
Figure 4. Northern red oak sapling height growth reduced to zero by deer browsing in northern Minnesota USA. Photo by Nick Fisichelli.
Note that trophic cascade effects vary in a mosaic pattern across the landscape, due to the locations of gray wolf (
Canis lupus L.) packs. In areas with high wolf densities, deer populations are low and unhindered expansion of temperate tree species into adjacent boreal stands can occur, whereas in other areas with low wolf populations, deer populations are higher and prevent the establishment of temperate tree seedlings [
31,
32]. Deer densities can also interact with other factors to create complex responses of temperate and boreal tree species to changing climate [
33,
34].
M4. Compound disturbances: wind and fire combination. A warmer climate is expected to lead to more days per year with conditions that will support extreme convective windstorms at the latitudes of the southern boreal forest [
26], and the resulting slash is very flammable, therefore this combination of events is expected to increase dramatically as the climate warms [
35]. Compound wind plus fire disturbances can convert tracts of conifers (over spatial extents of 10 s to 100 s km
2 similar to M2) to aspen and birch within boreal forests (). However, it can also increase abundances of temperate tree species such as bur oak, red oak and red maple [
35].
Figure 5. Conifer forest converted to paper birch after a wind and fire combination of disturbances in Minnesota USA. Windstorm was in 1999, the fire in 2002, and photo in 2007. Photo by Dave Hansen.
Wind-felled pine, spruce and fir stands have their cones on the ground along with dense slash, leading to consumption of seeds and seedlings in any fire that follows the windstorm within one-two decades. Fires in windfall slash have unusually high intensities and severities [
32]. This leaves the forest without a replacement layer, so that ruderal species of herbs, shrubs and trees can take over, possibly temperate grassland or temperate forest species close to the southern boreal forest, depending on how warm the regional climate has become. Succession to temperate species like red maple and northern red oak after combined wind and fire disturbance in the boreal biome would be an ecological surprise compared to historical successional patterns [
36].
M5. Long, warm summers and increased drought stress. Much of the boreal forest lies adjacent to grasslands. The transition zone is coincident with a change in climate from one with a positive difference between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PPT minus PET > 0, which supports forest) to one where PPT minus PET is less than zero (which supports grasslands, [
37,
38,
39]) that occurs over relatively short spatial distances of 10–100 km [
40]. Warming-exacerbated declines in soil moisture are likely to negatively impact tree photosynthesis in this region. In addition, drier soils can also flip the response of photosynthesis to modestly higher temperatures from positive to negative [
41]. This results in drier soils from heightened stomatal closure in response to warming outweighing increasing biochemical capacity for photosynthesis; whereas the latter dominates in moist soils. Therefore, a pronounced shift in the zero balance line for precipitation and evaporation could lead to widespread forest death, especially during a run of several unusually warm and dry years that could occur decades before the mean climate shifts to one that favors grasslands. Runs of several warm dry years have already led to mortality and slowed growth of several boreal species [
42,
43,
44] (), and conversion from boreal forest to grassland/savanna in some parts of Canada [
8]. This trend is predicted to continue during the 21st Century [
45,
46]. However, the drying of the climate could also lead to conversion from boreal forest to drought-tolerant temperate tree species. Bur oak, northern pin oak, and northern red oak are already present near the southern boreal forest on dry sites, and white oak (
Quercus alba L.) and black oak (
Q. velutina Lambert) could migrate there [
47]. Due to the high landscape diversity of the Canadian Shield that underlies northern Minnesota, Ontario and Manitoba, with soils of greatly varying water holding capacity, a mosaic of grassland, savanna and woodland could form [
7,
10,
12]. Transformation of boreal forests could be gradual (with gradually increasing drought stress) or moderately sudden (with a run of several hot, dry years) [
38].
Figure 6. Dying boreal paper birch forest after severe drought in 8 of the 10 most recent summers, North Shore Lake Superior, Minnesota, USA. Photo by David Hansen, September 2008.
M6. Insect infestation due to lack of extreme winter cold. Populations of many potentially lethal insect species are kept at bay by occasional (ca once per decade) winter cold spells [
5], which in the central North American boreal forest can be −40 to −55 °C. For example, mountain pine beetle (
Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins), although native in western North America, has exploded in population density in recent years after a run of several warm winters, and has killed millions of ha of lodgepole pine (
Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) [
48]. This insect pest has not been able to reach the study region, due to lack of trees across the Great Plains, and extremely cold winters across the southern boreal forest to the north, where it has been shown that native jack pine is a suitable host [
48]. With a run of several very warm winters, this insect could move into the study region. Many other potential insect pests that have remained at low populations for decades or centuries could become problems, and there are likely to be surprises as to which species have tree-killing outbreaks in the future. Numerous insect pests and diseases have also been introduced to North America from elsewhere (471 species, [
49]). If climate change caused nothing other than warmer nights at mid-winter, it could still kill large swaths of the boreal forest in the study region. Any one insect would be likely to kill monodominant stands of its target species on a regional scale, creating a patchy mosaic of dead stands at the regional scale.
M7. Phenological disturbance. This is a new concept as a disturbance. It would be manifested as late-winter warm spells causing boreal conifers to prematurely lose frost hardiness, followed by foliar damage during subsequent frost [
50]. This happened in springs of 2007 and 2012 in northern Minnesota and adjacent Ontario. There is evidence that boreal species respond more rapidly to forcing temperatures and less to other cues (e.g., winter chilling or photoperiod) and as a result have the potential to lose frost hardiness in mid-winter and early spring [
51,
52,
53]. During March 2012, temperatures with daytime maxima of 20–25 °C occurred in northern Minnesota and adjacent Ontario from March 15–22 (note that daily maximum temperatures would normally be below freezing during this period), and trees came out of dormancy, followed by freezing temperatures that led to needle reddening and loss of most of their foliage ([
54], ). Similarly, an unusually warm March followed by extreme cold in April led to significant foliar tissue loss in a warming experiment in boreal peatlands. Trees in the warmest treatments de-hardened in the March warm spell only to have tissues killed by the April frost [
53]. Many trees recover after these types of events, following several winters with normal late-winter temperatures [
55]. However, occurrences of extremely warm late-winter weather 2–3 years in a row could kill boreal conifers, which have needle life spans of 4–7 years, and do not have the same ability to recover from defoliation as deciduous tree species. Although we do not have observations of more than single years of defoliation due to late-winter warm spells, we do know from other studies of defoliation, that the greater the percent of foliage lost, and the greater the number of consecutive years of defoliation occurs, the greater the mortality rates for boreal conifers [
56,
57]. The extreme weather of March 2012 is close to an average March projected by some of the GCMs for a business as usual (RPC 8.5) climate for 2070 [
17]; thus, sometime between now and then, it is very likely that a run of several consecutive very warm springs will occur. Very large areas could be affected by phenological disturbance, since persistent mid-latitude ridges in the jet stream that lead to long periods of anomalously warm weather, are becoming more common as the arctic warms, and can occur at subcontinental spatial extents [
58].
Figure 7. Phenological disturbance—needle reddening of boreal jack pine and balsam fir forest in Minnesota, USA after the anomalously warm March of 2012. Photo by Elias Anoszko.