The term fermentation derives from the Latin ‘fervere’, which means to boil, due to the appearance produced by yeast on fruit or malt extracts, as a result of the production of carbon dioxide bubbles caused by the catabolism of the sugars in the extract. The most common concept of fermentation is the conversion of sugar into an organic acid, then into alcohol. It occurs naturally in many food types, and humans have used it since ancient times to improve the preservation and the organoleptic properties of food. This term is only used when referring to microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts, and fungi) to make useful products for humans such as biomasses, enzymes, primary and secondary metabolites, recombinant products, and biotransformed products used in industry. Fermentation is a catabolic process of incomplete oxidation, completely anaerobic, and its final product is an organic compound, where in the absence of oxygen, the final acceptor of the NADH electrons produced in glycolysis is not oxygen, but an organic compound that will be reduced to oxidize NADH to NAD+ . There are different types of fermentation, e.g., alcoholic, acetic, butyric, and lactic. The fermentation processes have some main purposes: (1) the enrichment of the diet by developing flavors, aromas, and textures; (2) food preservation through lactic acid, ethanol, acetic acid, and alkaline fermentations; (3) enrichment of foods with protein, amino acids, lipids, and vitamins; (4) decrease in cooking time and fuel requirements so that the loss of nutrients is less; and (5) it can produce nutrients or eliminate anti-nutrients; being the final product an organic compound that characterizes the types of fermentation.
| Submerged Fermentation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantages | Reference | Disadvantages | Reference |
| Easier and the product is easy to recover | [32] | The difficulty for the passage of oxygen in the liquid medium | [33,34] |
| Sterilization facilitates the process and its control | [35] | Detrimental to fungal growth | [36,37] |
| Efficiency in preventing the growth of other microorganisms | [38] | ||
| Homogeneity in culture media and control in temperature and pH | [39,40] | ||
| Better control of physicochemical parameters, more biomass growth in less time | [41] | ||
| Ease in determining biomass by simple filtration or centrifugation | [33] | ||
| It is used for bioremediation of effluents in industries | [42] | ||
| Bacteria, yeasts, and fungi can be used depending on the objective | [37] | ||
| It requires less investment, less energy, and a simple means of fermentation. Better condition of bacterial control | [26] | ||
| It is used on an industrial scale, nutrients, and oxygen dissolve easily in the medium and disperse throughout the bioreactor, so heat and mass increase efficiency | [36] | ||
| Incubation time decrease, better control in the process | [43] | ||
| Have a better performance, reduces costs and is sustainable, making it beneficial for the environment and the economy of production | [44] | ||
| Solid-State Fermentation | |||
| Effective to produce enzymes | [45] | Low O2 and CO2 transfer ratio, it is difficult to monitor, control, and scale. There is no uniformity in culture | [32] |
| Effective to produce bioactive compounds | [46] | Slower microorganism’s growth | [3] |
| Lower demand for water and energy, easy aeration in the medium | [33] | It is less efficient for the growth of microorganisms that require high water content | [47] |
| Most used for agro-industrial waste. Economical and superior enzymatic performance | [48] | ||
| There is less waste of water, simplicity | [46] | ||
| They are much more efficient fermentations; their products are stable and can be easily recovered | [36] | ||

| Microorganism | Reference |
|---|---|
| Aspergillus niger | [6] |
| Enterococcus faecalis | [55] |
| Aspergillus ficuum | [56] |
| Achromobacter | |
| Corynebacterium spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae | [49] |
| Azotobacter Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum |
[57] |
| Aspergillus oryzae | [55] |
| Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum Fusarium Trichoderma |
[56] |
| Enterobacter cloacae | [49] |
| Microorganism | Isolation Source | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limosilactobacillus reuteri | Whole wheat sourdough |
Antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger | [65] |
| Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis NRRL B-633, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. cremoris NRRL B-634, Pediococcus acidilactici NRRL B-1116, P. pentosaceus NRRL B-14009, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides NRRL B-1118, Latilactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei NRRL B1917, Limosilactobacillus fermentum NRRL B-1932, Limosilactobacillus reuteri NRRL B-14171, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NRRL B-4496, Lactobacillus acidophilus NRRL B-4495, Lacticaseibacillus casei NRRL B1922, Levilactobacillus brevis ATCC 367, Lacticaseibacillus casei 21/1, Lactobacillus amylovorus ATCC 33621, Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis ATCC 27651, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NRRL B-442. |
- | Antimicrobials in vitro against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella sonnei, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella typhimurium, or Listeria monocytogenes |
[66] |
| Lactobacillus spp. | - | Produces exopolysaccharides that have interesting film-forming properties and may be used to produce edible packaging. | [67] |
| Enterococcus mundtii STw38 | Tehuelche scallop (Aequipecten tehuelchus), Patagonian Argentinean clam (Ameghinomya antique), Patagonian blue mussel (Mytilus edulis platensis), sea cucumber (Hemiodema spectabilis), geoduck (Panopea generosa) and razor clam (Solen tehuelchus) of the Argentine coast |
Reducing the development of native flora of fish paste. | [68] |
| P. pentosaceus FP3, Ligilactobacillus salivarius FP35, Ligilactobacillus salivarius FP25, and E. faecium FP51 |
Collected from 17 healthy infant feces samples in the hospital of Chiang Mai. | The use of these probiotics may be suitable as an alternative bioprophylactic and biotherapeutic strategy for colon cancer. | [69] |
| 7 Lacticaseibacillus casei, 27 Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, 15 Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, 7 Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, 1 E. faecium, and 1 Enterococcus lactis. | Traditional Italian cheeses. | These strains with proven in vitro properties are good candidates for novel probiotic-containing formulations and could be used to functionalize foods such as dairy fermented products. | [70] |
| S. thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis SL242, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Lactis SL28 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis IO-1 | - | Development method presented is natural and low-cost and allows for the production of clean-label and lactose-free dairy products without using commercial enzymes from recombinant microorganisms. | [71] |
| Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus, Acetobacter aceti, Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. adolescentics, B. longum, B. animalis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus |
Iprovit Bacterial Milk-Yogurt Starter™, Symbilact Vivo Starter™ and Provit Streptosan Milk Starter™ |
The development of edible coatings containing LAB to wheat bread diminished the number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative aerobic bacteria in the bread crust and protected it from contamination of mycelium fungi of genera Aspergillus and Penicillium. | [72] |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: TL-1, TL-2, TP-2, TP-5, I-UL4, I 11, RG 11, RG 14, RS 5. 6 Pediococcus pentosaceus: B12m9, TB-1, TL-3, TP-3, TP-4, TP-8. 2 Pediococcus acidilactici: TB-2, TP-6. |
Tempeh-fermented soybean cake, apai ubi-fermented cassava, ikan rebus-steam fish, budu-fermented fish sauce, tempeh-fermented soybean cake and empeh-fermented soybean cake |
LAB isolates possess versatile extracellular proteolytic system and have vast capability of producing various amino acids including as methionine, lysine, threonine and tryptophan. | [73] |
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/fermentation7020048