γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT), a membrane-bound enzyme, contributes to the metabolism of glutathione (GSH), which plays a critical physiological role in protecting cells against oxidative stress. GGT has been proposed as a biomarker of carcinogenesis and tumor progression given that GGT activity is important during both the promotion and invasion phases in cancer cells.
γ-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) is one of the enzymes involved in the γ-glutamyl cycle, which contributes to the synthesis and degradation of glutathione (GSH) [1]. GSH is known to be a major intracellular water-soluble antioxidant playing a protective role against reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2]. GGT also has a possible, albeit controversial, role in the transportation of amino acids across cellular membranes [3]. In addition to being used as a hepatobiliary biomarker that is especially sensitive to excessive alcohol consumption [4], elevated serum GGT has been shown to be an adverse prognostic factor in patients with life-threatening diseases. A recent study reported on the utility of the serum GGT level as a predictive biomarker of clinical outcomes in patients with a multitude of conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome [4]. Moreover, serum GGT is reportedly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with liver cancer, reflecting unfavorable clinicopathological features, including vascular invasion and the tumor burden, as demonstrated in previous meta-analyses [5][6]. Subsequently, serum GGT was also found to be a significant prognostic biomarker in patients with a variety of malignant neoplasms; however, reports of serum GGT in relation to genitourinary (GU) cancer are relatively limited, and the findings among studies of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are sometimes contradictory depending on the metastatic status of the disease [7][8][9][10][11][12]. On the other hand, serum GGT was found to be significantly and independently associated with shorter overall survival in patients with advanced GU cancer, such as metastatic prostate cancer (PC) and advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) [13][14].
There are at least eight potential full-length GGT family proteins, including GGT1, GGT2, GGT3P, GGT4P, GGT5, GGT6, GGT7, and GGT8P [15]. Of these, GGT1 and GGT5 are the only two enzymes that have been shown to be catalytically active [15][16]. Immunolabelling of these closely related enzymes in human tissues has revealed different expression patterns in different organs or even within the same tissue (e.g., GGT1 is expressed on the apical surface of the renal proximal tubules whereas GGT5 is expressed in the interstitial cells of the kidney), resulting in access to different substrates [17]. Moreover, their enzymatic activities are not at the same level according to a previous kinetic analysis, which demonstrated that GGT1 is able to cleave GSH approximately 46 times faster than GGT5 [18]. Furthermore, a genetic deficiency of the GGT1 gene was found to cause severe growth failure or skeletal abnormalities while null mutants of GGT5 gene have not been associated with any obvious phenotypic changes, indicating that GGT1 functions cannot be compensated by those of GGT5 [19][20][21]. The predominance of GGT1 among the GGT family proteins in terms of GSH metabolism is further supported by a recent genetic analysis of two siblings with a GGT deficiency (i.e., glutathionuria, OMIM 231950) [22]. Whole-genome sequencing identified a large homozygous intragenic deletion in GGT1 causing glutathionuria in the patients. Other potentially active enzymes in the GGT family include GGT7, which shares amino acid similarities with GGT1. However, neither its expression pattern nor its functions have been determined [15]. Reports on the protein expression analysis of GGT7 are only limited to ovarian cancer and glioblastoma and have produced conflicting results; in the former, strong GGT7 expression was associated with higher serum GGT, which was in turn associated with an advanced tumor stage and a worse prognosis while, in the latter, strong GGT7 expression was associated with a better prognosis [23][24]. Further studies are needed to clarify the behavior of these proteins, given that GGT7 may have different enzymatic functions as it shares only 47% and 52% of its amino acid sequence with GGT1 and GGT5, respectively, and has high variation in its light chain 15. Taken together, GGT1 is the most extensively studied catalytic enzyme among the GGT family proteins and is ubiquitously expressed in the human body [25].
A recombinant human GGT1 protein was identified as a heterodimer consisting of two glycosylated subunits with a mean molecular mass of 80 kDa and 29 kDa, respectively. The crystal structure of human GGT1 was subsequently obtained by high-resolution X-ray crystallography [26][27]. The active site of human GGT1 was identified as Thr-381, which can be blocked by competitive inhibitors, including acivicin, azaserine, and 6-diazo-5-oxo-norleucine, all of which are glutamate analogs [28].
GGT is an ectoenzyme in the cellular membrane and is known to cleave the γ-glutamyl bond of most γ-glutamyl peptide substrates, including GSH, glutathione S-drug conjugates, and leukotriene C4, resulting in a broad range of protective activities against oxidative stress, drugs, and inflammation [29][30][31]. Among the molecules cleaved by GGT is GSH, a tripeptide consisting of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine that functions as a major intracellular water-soluble antioxidant [2]. Glutamate is linked via a peptide bond through its γ-carboxyl to cysteine. This unusual peptide bond makes GSH resistant to degradation by most peptidases. Among its three constituent amino acids, cysteine is the least available, and thus GGT and the γ-glutamyl cycle play an important role in the metabolism of GSH, especially under cysteine-limited circumstances [32]. In fact, experimentally overexpressed GGT in melanoma cells promoted tumor growth through an intertissue flow of GSH and increased resistance to oxidative stress by recycling cysteine from the extracellular GSH [33][34]. Likewise, transfection of melanoma cells with GGT cDNA resulted in resistance to cisplatin, a major antitumor agent, presumably because of high intracellular cysteinyl–glycine levels resulting from GGT-mediated catabolism of extracellular GSH [35].
The extracellular domain of GGT cleaves the γ-glutamyl bond of GSH and releases cysteinyl–glycine and a γ-glutamyl amino acid at the initial step of the γ-glutamyl cycle (Figure 1). These peptides are subsequently cleaved by γ-glutamylcyclotransferase to yield 5-oxoproline, a free amino acid that is further converted into glutamate by the action of 5-oxoprilinase [3]. This cycle is also important for the resynthesis of intracellular GSH via step-by-step ligation of glutamate, cysteine, and glycine through the sequential action of glutamate–cysteine ligase and glutathione synthetase, leading to the homeostatic maintenance of the intracellular redox potential, as demonstrated in isolated kidney cells [2]. Another key enzyme involved in GSH homeostasis is cation transport regulator 1 (CHAC1), a newly discovered γ-glutamylcyclotransferase involved in the intracellular degradation of GSH [36]. This soluble enzyme is expressed primarily in the cytoplasm and can specifically degrade GSH into 5-oxoproline and cysteinyl-glycine but is inactive with other γ-glutamyl peptides [37]. The shared ability of GGT and CHAC1 to degrade GSH into its component peptides, including cysteine, suggests that they interactively play a scavenging function when cells are exposed to cysteine depletion [36].
Figure 1. GGT and other enzymes in the γ-glutamyl cycle. Extracellular GSH (γ-glutamyl–cysteinyl–glycine) is broken down on the cell membrane by membrane-bound GGT, making component peptides available to cells with successive reactions with other enzymes. Intracellular GSH is then resynthesized, increasing resistance to oxidative stress. AA, amino acid; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; GCL, glutamate-cysteine ligase; GGCT, γ-glutamylcyclotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; GSH, glutathione; GSS, glutathione synthetase; Pi, inorganic phosphate.
The antioxidative properties of GGT have also been attested by evidence showing that GGT transcription is stimulated by a pro-inflammatory cytokine of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and that various inhibitors of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) prevent overexpression of GGT, confirming that GGT expression induced by TNF-α is mediated by NF-κB [38]. Interestingly, GGT itself can act as a modulator of NF-κB transcriptional activity since it impairs the redox status of thiols that are indispensable for NF-κB DNA binding and gene transactivation [39]. On the other hand, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is involved in an important signaling pathway within the antioxidant response of cancer cells to ROS [40]. Nevertheless, GGT promoter activity is reportedly independent of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, as demonstrated by transfection of cells with small interfering RNA against Nrf2 [41]. Both NF-κB and Nrf2 are induced by ROS and are believed to interfere with one another [42]. GGT located downstream of NF-κB thus promotes proliferation while avoiding apoptosis via Nrf2, eventually leading to carcinogenesis (Figure 2). Apart from its potential role in carcinogenesis, GGT expression is necessary in cell proliferation, migration, and tumor growth because GGT inhibition induces cell cycle arrest with decreased Ki67-positive cells [43]. Thus, GGT appears to be involved in both the early stages of carcinogenesis and the late stages of tumor progression.
Figure 2. GGT and related molecules in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. TNF-α produces ROS, leading to Nrf2 and NF-κB overpresentation. GGT interacts with NF-κB and helps NF-κB interfere with apoptosis induced by Nrf2. Both nuclear translocation of NF-κB and intracellular resynthesis of GSH, each supported by the enzymatic activities of GGT, have a positive effect on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cancer cells. GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; GSH, glutathione; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; Nrf2, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
The physiological function of GGT has been described most clearly in the kidney, where GGT localized on the luminal surface of the proximal tubule cells prevents GSH excretion into the urine by initiating the cleavage of GSH into its constituent amino acids, which can then be reabsorbed [25]. Positive immunostaining for GGT was also observed in secretory epithelial cells of the prostatic ducts and acini although the underlying basal epithelial cells were negative for GGT [44]. GGT expression in the urinary tract is very low and only focal expression has been observed in the stroma under the urothelium [25]. Nonetheless, increased expression of GGT was reported in experimentally induced UC in rat urinary bladder treated with the carcinogen N-butyl-N-4-hydroxybutylnitrosamine, suggesting a more direct relationship with carcinogenesis in GGT than in other enzymes involved in drug metabolism [45]. Overexpression of GGT is not a specific marker for UC but is universally observed in tumors arising from different urogenital organs, including the urethra, prostate, and kidney, according to a previous comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis using an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody against peptides corresponding to the C-terminus of the heavy subunit of human GGT [46].
In general, malignant cells maintained the same phenotype as their normal counterparts in terms of GGT expression; most of the cancer types derived from GGT-positive organs were strongly positive for GGT. Indeed, PC arising from the GGT-positive secretory epithelial cells was positive for GGT while benign prostatic hyperplasia showed weak apical expression of GGT [44]. A partial explanation for the overexpression of GGT in PC lies in the fact that androgens can elevate GGT mRNA expression under the regulation of polyomavirus enhancer activator 3, a transcriptional factor, resulting in 500–800-fold greater GGT activity in normal seminal plasma and prostatic fluid than in normal serum [47][48]. In the aforementioned comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis, clear cell RCC arising from GGT-positive proximal renal tubule epithelial cells was strongly GGT-positive with prominent membranous staining patterns [25]. A more recent immunohistochemical analysis using surgically resected RCC specimens demonstrated that 57 out of 65 cases (not including chromophobe RCC) showed moderate to strong GGT expression regardless of their Fuhrman grade [11]. On the other hand, chromophobe RCC, hypothetically arising from GGT-negative distal renal tubule epithelial cells, was completely negative for GGT in contrast to clear cell RCC [25]. In accordance with GGT protein expression, GGT mRNA expression was found to be > 100-fold lower in chromophobe RCC than in normal kidney and clear cell RCC [49]. These findings suggested that GGT expression levels in GU cancer, as in other organs, reflects the phenotype of the original cell types.
The present section focuses on the possible clinical application of targeted treatment strategies against GGT utilizing several competitive and uncompetitive inhibitors.
Acivicin, a glutamine analogue, inhibits the catalytic activities of GGT [50] and significantly decreases both the rate of intracellular GSH replenishment and the maximum intracellular GSH content [33]. Following the discovery of acivicin, several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated acivicin’s therapeutic potential against various types of cancer, including PC, colon cancer, and melanoma [47][51][52]. During the 1980s and 1990s, acivicin was tested for its clinical relevance in phase I and phase II trials in patients with various advanced malignancies [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Despite the objective antitumor activity observed in some trials, acivicin failed to be approved for clinical use because of the potential for severe toxicity, such as lethal myelosuppression and neurotoxicity, although the causes of these adverse events were not clearly known at the time. However, the detailed mechanism of growth inhibition by acivicin has recently been confirmed based on proteomic profiling of cancer cells. The present study demonstrated that acivicin inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase 4A1 activity by binding to its catalytic site and does not exert its clinical effects through GGT inhibition, as acivicin has a very low affinity for human GGT [61]. Other glutamine analogues (e.g., the serine–borate complex and γ-phosphono diester analogues of glutamate) and glutamate derivatives or their analogues (e.g., sulfur derivatives of L-glutamic acid and 6-diazo-5-oxo-norleucine) have also been proposed; however, they cause similar toxicity-related problems because they not only inhibit GGT activity but also other essential glutamine metabolizing enzymes, including glutaminases and L-asparagine synthetase [62][63][64][65].
Several novel inhibitors have been developed to overcome the low affinity and high toxicity of existing GGT inhibitors. OU749, a lead compound, is an uncompetitive inhibitor that occupies the acceptor site but not the γ-glutamyl site of GGT [66]. It is worth noting that OU749 is more than 150-fold less toxic than acivicin but has 7–10-fold greater inhibitory potency against GGT isolated from human kidney than GGT isolated from rat or mouse kidney. This ability of OU749 has also been validated under in vivo conditions using GGT-positive cell lines; OU749 blocked GGT catabolism of GSH, providing a basis for further development of a novel therapeutic agent capable of inhibiting GGT via a mechanism distinct from that of the toxic glutamine analogue [67]. Ovothiols, which are histidine-derived thiols isolated from sea urchin eggs, are known to protect the eggs from high oxidative stress at fertilization and may induce autophagy-dependent cell death in human hepatic cancer cells with high GGT expression while leaving normal cells unaffected [68]. Current studies have revealed that the uncompetitive GGT-inhibitory properties of ovothiols produced by marine invertebrates provide great promise for improving molecular-targeted therapy for GGT-positive malignancies, including GU cancer [69][70]. Clinical trials and optimization of these less toxic GGT inhibitors are warranted for the development of novel treatments.
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/antiox10040549