Microplastics in Glaciers | Encyclopedia MDPI

Microplastics in Glaciers: History

Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Subjects: Environmental Studies

Contributor:

Microplastic particles, as a second-phase material in ice, may contribute to the effect such particles have on the melting and rheological behaviour of glaciers, and thus influence the future meltwater contribution to the oceans and rising sea levels. Hence, it is of the utmost importance to map and understand the presence and dispersal of microplastics on a global scale. In this work, we identified microplastic particles in snow cores collected in a remote and pristine location on the Vatnajökull ice cap in Iceland. Utilising optical microscopy and µ-Raman spectroscopy, we visualised and identified microplastic particles of various sizes and materials. Our findings support that atmospheric transport of microplastic particles is one of the important pathways for microplastic pollution.

microplastics
glacier
snow
ice
µ-Raman spectroscopy
atmospheric transport
pollution
climate change

1. Introduction

Plastic materials are some of the most important compounds used by modern societies, relying heavily on their use for healthcare, food supply chains, information technology, clothing, transportation, infrastructure, and other essential elements of societies. Plastic materials, made of synthetic or semi-synthetic organic compounds, have the valuable property of deforming irreversibly without breaking and can be moulded into various forms and shapes with different density, hardness, strength, resistance, and other physical properties. Commercial mass production of plastic materials from petrochemicals is relatively inexpensive and has grown massively since it started in around 1950 [1]. Most plastic materials are very durable and degrade slowly in nature, which has led to a tremendous accumulation of plastic waste [1]. The plastic pollutants can be debris of different types of plastic material, classified by size into nanoplastic (<1 µm), microplastic (1 µm to 5 mm), and macroplastic (>5 mm) [2]. The smaller the plastic debris, the more difficult it becomes to collect for recycling, and the easier they can spread in natural environments; hence, microplastic pollution is an increasing threat to the biosphere, including the food chain and human health [3]. Microplastic particles are usually categorised into primary particles, which are produced for specific purposes, and secondary microplastic particles, resulting from the disintegration of larger plastic elements [4]. The effects of plastic particles on the biosphere are not fully understood [5], although microplastics have been shown to affect animal and plant life and exist in the food chain. Furthermore, airborne plastic particles can accumulate in human lungs and can have various harmful effects on human health [6,7,8]. The immune system cannot remove the potentially toxic particles, which can affect the gut microbiota, lipid metabolism, and cause oxidative stress [9]. If the concentration is very high, microplastics may cause neurodegenerative diseases, immune disorders, and cancers, although further research is needed for an improved understanding of the effects on human health [10].

Microplastics in oceans have been rather widely studied in recent years, and it has been shown that microplastics are an emerging pollutant in the marine environment and aquatic life [11,12,13]. Several studies have also detected microplastics in other terrestrial ecosystems, such as sediments and soils, as well as freshwater ecosystems, including rivers and lakes [14]. Microplastic pollution has also been identified in bottled drinking water, tap water, and food [6,15,16]. Furthermore, microplastics have been detected in the human stool and it has been shown that they can enter the human body through dermal contact, ingestion, and inhalation [17]. Nevertheless, microplastic particles’ environmental transfer pathways are poorly understood [18]. It has been shown for the marine systems that microplastics are either directly discharged into the sea or transported in rivers, sewage, and by waste streams. In terrestrial systems, the highest concentration of microplastics is usually close to urban areas, although recently considerable microplastic pollution has been identified in remote areas far away from the known sources of microplastics [19]. The existence of microplastic in remote terrestrial areas is explained by convective atmospheric transfer of the small and light particles [19,20]. Microplastics are also believed to transfer through the hydrological cycle, which can carry plastic particles over long distances to receptor regions where they are distributed over marine or terrestrial areas with rain or snow. For example, microplastics have been identified in a remote, pristine mountain catchment in the French Pyrenees, where it was shown that particle transport occurs through the atmosphere over a distance of up to 95 km [21]. Microplastics have also been identified in seawater, sea ice, and sediments in Polar Regions [22,23,24,25,26,27], where long-range transport, including ocean currents and wind, is believed to play the key role [28].

Glaciers are a terrestrial system that has received little attention so far in the research literature regarding plastic pollution, even though glaciers cover around 10% of the Earth’s land surface [29]. Glaciers form over decades or centuries, where the accumulation rate of snow (and rain) exceeds the melting rate. Each year, a new layer of snow creates pressure on older layers, which gradually transforms the snow into ice. Microplastic particles have been shown in laboratory experiments to act as a nucleus for the creation of ice crystals in the atmosphere [30]. Snow and rain are effective mechanisms for scavenging particles from the atmosphere; hence, glaciers are significant sinks for atmospheric microplastics and other pollutants. Plastic materials should be well preserved in the glaciers due to the low temperatures and lack of sunlight resulting from fast burial beneath the snow column, which reduces particle degradation. Moreover, glaciers are often found in relatively remote locations, making them an important test site for understanding the airborne distribution of microplastics. Furthermore, drilling deep cores from ice sheets can provide important information on the historical development of microplastic contamination.

A limited number of studies have published results confirming the presence of plastic pollution in glaciers or snow samples. Ambrosini et al. [31] identified microplastic particles in supraglacial debris of the Furni Glacier in the Italian Alps. The identified types of plastic were polyesters, polyamide, polyethylene, and polypropylene and the quantified amount was similar to measurements in European marine and sediment samples. Bergmann et al. [32] identified microplastics in snow samples collected from ice floes drifting in Fram Strait (west of Svalbard) and on Svalbard. In their study, the measured microplastic concentration was lower than in snow samples collected in urban sites in Northern Europe, including the Alps. Finally, Cabrera et al. [33] identified microplastics in the remote Antisana Glacier in the Ecuadorian Andes, including fibres, films, fragments, and spheres of various colours and sizes from 60 to 2500 µm.

There is a gap in the knowledge regarding the presence, distribution, effect of microplastics, and in the understanding of the overall life-cycle of microplastics in the nature and the atmosphere [20]. In particular, it is largely unknown whether snow acts as a transmitter and glaciers as a sink for microplastics. The microplastic content has the potential of changing the light-absorbing, structural, and general rheological properties of glaciers and thereby potentially affect the melting of the sensitive cryosphere, which is the largest driver of rising sea levels [34].

In this paper, we present our first findings on the presence of microplastics in the central part of the Vatnajökull ice cap in southeast Iceland (see Figure 1), which is, by volume, the largest ice cap in Europe. Iceland is sparsely populated and the sampling location is remote. Hence, the ice cap represents one of the world’s best locations to study the long-distance transport mechanisms of microplastic, as well as to study its short and long-term effects on glacial dynamics. Herein, we report the findings of various types and differently sized microplastic particles within the uppermost 3 m of the Vatnajökull glacier that could be unambiguously identified utilising µ-Raman spectroscopy and optical microscopy.

Figure 1. The remote sampling location on the Vatnajökull ice cap in Iceland is marked with an “X”. The coordinates of the location are 64.43415° N and 16.43670° W.

2. Development and Findings

Despite the lack of research on microplastic contamination, glaciers are of great importance for the overall water-cycle, cover a considerable share of the Earth’s land-surface, and are the largest freshwater reservoirs. Microplastics are a second-phase material inside the glacier. Several studies on other second-phase materials such as minerals, ash/tephra, or other rock fragments have shown that second-phase materials do have an influence on glaciers’ behaviour, such as the change in the light absorbance, structural, and general rheological properties of glaciers [40,41], and hereby, potentially contribute to the melting of glaciers, which is the largest source of rising sea levels [34]. To which extent and at which concentration microplastics increase these effects is not known yet, but microplastics will likely act similar to other second-phase materials.

The particles identified in our study were similar in morphology and size and were made of similar materials as reported in the other published literature on microplastic findings in glaciers [31,32,33]. Unpublished data from the Hofsjökull ice cap in Iceland further indicate the wide-spread presence of microplastic particles in glaciers in Iceland [42].

The location of the sampling site on Vatnajökull is remote, hence direct contamination is unlikely. Due to their small sizes, the most likely pathway for the microplastic particles to the sampling site is through atmospheric transport [20]. The morphology of the identified particles, fragments, and fibres further supports the hypothesis of atmospheric transport [20]. Atmospheric transport of microplastics has not yet been extensively studied and is not fully understood [20,21,43]. Further research is needed on the transport pathways from sources to sinks and how they are affected by meteorological and geographical conditions, and also by the density and types of particles. In the case of the Vatnajökull ice cap, the pathways for the microplastics may either be wind or precipitation. The microplastic particles may either be directly released from urban or industrial areas or indirectly from the sea, lakes, or other natural systems where they have accumulated [44]. The potential sources of microplastics in the case of the Vatnajökull ice cap include small villages, the closest one being Höfn, located 65 km from the sampling site, and larger towns, including Reykjavík, which is likely the largest plastic polluter in Iceland, located 270 km west of the sampling site (see Figure 1). The direct distance to the sea is 45 km, which is also a potential source [45]. Furthermore, the microplastic particles may also be carried over a long distance with trade winds from sources far away, such as in Northern America and Europe. An air mass trajectory analysis can be used to study the atmospheric transport of microplastics [30,46]. Tools such as the HYSPLIT model [47] have been successfully used for estimating the diffusion of various air pollutants and for back trajectory analysis to establish source–sink relationships for known events. In the case of atmospheric transport of microplastics, there are, however, still many unknowns as previously described, and therefore great uncertainty regarding many of the required modelling parameters [20]. Identifying microplastic particles in snow and ice on remote pristine glaciers, such as the Vatnajökull ice cap, can help understand the airborne distribution of microplastics and will be studied further.

Even though an effort was made to avoid contamination during sampling and analysis of the samples, it is still difficult to fully exclude the possibility of contamination of the analysed samples. Three main sources of potential contamination are identified as (i) the coring equipment, which is partially made of fibreglass (glass-reinforced plastic (GRP)), (ii) the black plastic tape, which is composed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) backing and a non-corrosive rubber-based adhesive, and (iii) the boxes made of polystyrene plastic. Samples were taken from these potential sources of plastic contamination and used as a reference for the analysis of particles. The Raman spectroscopy procedure we employed for analysing the samples was very effective in identifying microplastic particles. Nevertheless, we experienced some difficulties, mostly since the microplastic particles are often weathered, and therefore the Raman signal can be different from unweathered plastic. Other reasons for the relative differences between the samples and the reference standards could be caused by differences in colour or the presence of degradation products or contaminations. However, it was useful to have both the SLoPP and the SLoPPE microplastic particle spectral libraries, as the latter contains weathered samples from natural environments. Furthermore, the colour of microplastics often dominates the Raman spectrum, which can make the identification more difficult. For example, this was a problem when the particles shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 were analysed and could partly explain the low HQI values obtained. Finally, the microplastic particles can be easily mixed up with cotton or cellulose, which are the most common sources of possible contamination during sampling. Figure 8a is an example of a cellulose fibre that is visually similar to a plastic particle. It is therefore of great importance for spectroscopic analysis of microplastic particles to have extensive libraries of known reference materials.

The preliminary investigation performed in this work only collected and analysed a single set of snow cores from the Vatnajökull ice cap. It is of great interest to collect samples from other locations on the ice cap. Comparing the potential microplastic content in such samples will help correlate the microplastic quantities with atmospheric and geographical conditions and hopefully contribute to an improved understanding of the atmospheric transport of plastic particles.

3. Conclusions

Microplastic pollution is an increasing threat to the biosphere, including the food chain and human health. Furthermore, microplastic particles, as a second-phase material in the ice, may contribute to the effect such particles have on the melting and rheological behaviour of glaciers, and thus play a crucial role for future meltwater contribution to the oceans. Plastic particles degrade slowly in the cold glacier environment and can persist in glaciers for a long time, from which they are eventually released, which can lead to pollution in rivers and marine environments. Hence, it is important to map and understand the presence and dispersal of microplastics on a global scale. In this work, we identified microplastic particles in snow cores collected in a remote and pristine location on the Vatnajökull ice cap in Iceland. Utilising optical microscopy and µ-Raman spectroscopy, we visualised and identified microplastic particles of various sizes and materials. Our findings support that atmospheric transport of microplastic particles is one of the important pathways for microplastic pollution. However, further research is needed on the transport pathways and how they are affected by the conditions and types of particles.

This study demonstrated the presence of microplastic particles on the Vatnajökull ice cap, but a systematic sampling program is needed to better quantify the microplastic contamination in this remote area of the North Atlantic. In the long-term, such work will contribute to the currently limited existing knowledge on microplastic contamination of glaciers and the potential changes such contamination can cause, and will improve the understanding of the atmospheric transport of microplastics.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su13084183

© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.