Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Antimicrobial Efficacy: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Microbiology
Contributor: Yu Peng

Within microbial inactivation methods, antimicrobial efficacy is the capacity of a defined antimicrobial intervention—such as a chemical biocide, antimicrobial material, physical treatment, or biological agent—to inhibit microbial multiplication and/or to reduce the number of viable microorganisms under specified exposure conditions. It is an outcome-dependent property rather than an intrinsic synonym for the presence of antimicrobial activity: efficacy is defined only in relation to a target microorganism or microbial population, the magnitude and endpoint of the observed effect, and the controlled conditions of exposure, including agent concentration or intensity, contact time, temperature, growth state, inoculum, and test matrix [1][2].

The effect may be expressed as growth inhibition, loss of culturability, or microbial killing/inactivation, commonly quantified by minimum inhibitory or microbicidal concentrations, time–kill kinetics, or logarithmic reductions in viable counts [1][3]. Antimicrobial efficacy is therefore distinct from antimicrobial susceptibility, which characterizes the response of a microorganism to an agent under a defined test system, and from antimicrobial resistance, which denotes reduced susceptibility relative to an appropriate reference or interpretive framework. In the context of inactivation, a credible efficacy determination requires a specified microbial endpoint and standardized or otherwise explicitly described test conditions, because methodological variables directly affect the measured extent of microbial reduction [2][4].

  • Microbial inactivation
  • Log reduction
  • Biocidal activity
  • Viability reduction

Microbial Inactivation Methods • Biotechnology • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology • Life Sciences

References

  1. Mounyr Balouiri; Moulay Sadiki; Saad Koraichi Ibnsouda; Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71-79, 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005.
  2. Alexander J. Cunliffe; Peter D. Askew; Ina Stephan; Gillian Iredale; Patrick Cosemans; Lisa M. Simmons; Joanna Verran; James Redfern; How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods. Antibiot. 2021, 10, 1069, 10.3390/antibiotics10091069.
  3. G. A. Pankey; L. D. Sabath; Clinical Relevance of Bacteriostatic versus Bactericidal Mechanisms of Action in the Treatment of Gram‐Positive Bacterial Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, 864-870, 10.1086/381972.
  4. Szilvia Neuhaus; Andrea T. Feßler; Ralf Dieckmann; Lara Thieme; Mathias W. Pletz; Stefan Schwarz; Sascha Al Dahouk; Towards a Harmonized Terminology: A Glossary for Biocide Susceptibility Testing. Pathog. 2022, 11, 1455, 10.3390/pathogens11121455.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Academic Video Service