You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in persistent alterations in social cognition, trust, and behavior because of its long-term psychological and neurological effects. By conditioning individuals to associate proximity with risk, the pandemic-induced psychological distance has reshaped human interactions. This distance is enforced through social distancing and public health measures. Ultimately, this process has impacted societal cohesion, interpersonal relationships, and workplace behaviors by reinforcing avoidance behaviors, heightened social anxiety, and altering trust dynamics. An interdisciplinary approach that integrates neuroscience, psychology, and social science is necessary to comprehend these changes to address the challenges of re-establishing pre-pandemic norms.
- psychological distance
- neural conditioning
- social avoidance
- post-pandemic anxiety
- fear-based behavior
- cognitive dissonance
- trust erosion
- remote work adaptation
- social cognition
- behavioral inhibition
Social interactions were substantially altered by the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures that followed alongside it, like masking and social distancing, which resulted in psychological associations that persist long after the pandemic occurred. Requiring people to keep distance from each other and act cautiously made them subconsciously see others as possible threats, which has caused a lasting psychological distance between people.
This article examines how public health interventions implemented during the COVID-19 epidemic resulted in enduring alterations in social behavior via neurological, psychological, and sociocultural factors. The objective is to address the question at hand: In what manner did the pandemic influence the human brain and behavior to perceive others as threats, and what are the long-term repercussions of these alterations?
Public health messaging during the pandemic highlighted the dangers of close contact and portrayed other people as possible carriers of a dangerous virus. An implicit association between danger and proximity was strengthened by this messaging when used together with visual cues such as masks and physical barriers [1]. Although these actions were required to stop the virus’s spread, they also caused a change in how people perceived other people, making them feel less like members or partners of a community and more like potential sources of harm and danger.
This long-standing association persists even after the pandemic. For example, crowded places like malls or public transportation can still make people feel uncomfortable or irritated. These reactions are not purely situational but derive from a conditioned emotional response that associates people with risk [2].
Many people still limit their social interactions, not because they must, but rather because it is a habit. There are fewer spontaneous social encounters in public or social settings because of the normalization of psychological comfort in distancing [3]. It also reduced trust and empathy. Building trust and empathy requires collective behaviors like sharing, physical affection, and group activities, all of which were disrupted by the pandemic. Many people now feel more emotionally distant from others because of this disruption and the polarization of society over pandemic-related issues [4].
Some people are still extremely conscious of other people’s actions, like coughing or standing too closely. Despite its protective role during the pandemic, this vigilance now prevents people from completely unwinding and re-engaging with others, which maintains a sense of psychological distance [5].
The idea that people are potentially dangerous is made even stronger by the change in norms, such as the decrease in physical contact (such as hugs or handshakes). Because people are less likely to act in ways that express affection or trust, these changes subtly reinforce psychological separation [6].
In most gatherings prior to the pandemic, social interactions were characterized by spontaneity, openness, and a general sense of safety. Face-to-face interactions, group activities, and physical touch were essential for emotional health and human connection. Restrictions brought about by the pandemic caused a fundamental change, adding a level of restraint and calculation to interactions that hasn’t entirely disappeared.
There is now a noticeable hesitation in post-pandemic behaviors. Individuals may choose virtual communication over face-to-face meetings, avoid eye contact, or keep a physical distance even when it is not necessary. In addition to practical adaptations, these behaviors indicate a more profound psychological reluctance to re-engage with others.
The psychological distance generated by the pandemic is the outcome of both a collective change in social cognition and individual choice. Closeness now feels strange or dangerous because people have internalized distancing as the new standard for interaction. The emotional toll of the pandemic has made many people more self-protective and less likely to invest in relationships, which worsens this phenomenon [1].
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/encyclopedia5020060
References
- Taylor, S.; Landry, C.A.; Paluszek, M.M.; Fergus, T.A.; McKay, D.; Asmundson, G.J.G. COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates. Depress. Anxiety 2020, 37, 706–714.
- Spence, C.; Wang, Q.J.; Youssef, J. Adjusting to Life After Lockdown: Sensory Overload, the Return to Crowds, and Managing Stress. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 682154.
- Van der Velden, P.G.; Contino, C.; Das, M.; van Loon, P.; Bosmans, M.W. Anxiety and depression symptoms, and lack of emotional support among the general population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 277, 515–519.
- Alexander, J.C. Trauma: A Social Theory; Polity Press: New York, NY, USA, 2020.
- Pfefferbaum, B.; North, C.S. Mental Health and the COVID-19 Pandemic. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 510–512.
- Boss, P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!