Investigating Accounting Factors through Audited Financial Statements: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Enkeleda Lulaj
,
Blerta Dragusha
,
Eglantina Hysa

Day by day, the importance and impact of the investigation of accounting factors through audited financial statements are increasing based on qualified staff and investments in technology (equipment, machinery, etc.) toward a new approach in businesses. So, while changes in the global business environment have driven business transformation into more innovative businesses, they move toward profit sustainability by focusing on the efficiency of the costs recorded in the accounting financial statements.

  • accounting
  • circular economy
  • auditing
  • financial statements
  • sustainable profit
  • businesses

1. Introduction

To see the importance of the circular economy in businesses, according to (Korhonen et al. 2018), the circular economy (CE) is currently one of the concepts most promoted by the EU, several national governments, and various businesses around the world. Where the (CE) is important for its power to attract both the business community and the policy-making community in terms of the sustainability of profits, there is still a need for other scientific research to ensure the actual effects of the (CE) on the sustainability of profit. The implementation of the (CE) for different disciplines includes practical errors and an increasing variety of technological procedures to meet the need for the support of interested parties, in addition to improved business models (Wiesmeth 2020). Regarding the circular economy in terms of manufacturing businesses according to (Balanay et al. 2022), other regions such as East and Southeast Asia, Japan, China, Germany, Finland, and the Philippines were also researched in the production, energy, and forestry sectors, where the importance is emphasized and the scientific information is necessary for the advancement of the circular economy for a sustainable sector of profit through innovations that must be brought by the businesses of different countries. Furthermore, regarding the impact of the circular economy on businesses according to (Wójcik-Karpacz et al. 2023), the reinforcing factors of sustainable profit in businesses are the right technologies and digitalization, as well as managerial skills. To see the consequences of the circular economy on businesses in developing markets, according to (Dantas et al. 2022), the consequences of the circular economy show that policymakers should reevaluate their business policies by promoting open innovation within the circular economy. To see the effects of circular economy innovation and business model innovations on the sustainability of business profit according to (Hysa et al. 2020; Rehman et al. 2022), innovations have positive effects on performance and the sustainability of profit. Furthermore, if talking about circularity and innovation, it does not only discuss the micro-level impact it has in companies but also the micro-level dimension that is linked with social innovation, energy transition, environment, and related issues (Popescu et al. 2022).

2. Investigating Accounting Factors, Financial Statements, Auditing, Qualified Staff, and Investment on Technologies for Sustainable Profit in Businesses toward a Circular Economy

All the assessments so far are sending businesses to develop five important points, such as a fundamental evolution of financial reporting standards, the benefits of the connection of financial reporting and non-financial reporting as the main challenge to obtain holistic and coherent information, double materiality, and the effect of reversion to identify financial reporting in two perspectives: external–internal (how ESG factors affect the development, performance, position of the business—often identified as financial materiality) and internal–external (as business activity affects ESG factors—often identified as environmental and social materiality), and potential linkage approaches (direct linkage and indirect linkage); location of non-financial information is a central lever for integrating FI and NFI; the location of NFI is of prime importance (EFRAG 2021). According to (Karasioğlu et al. 2021), the impact of accounting ethics on the quality of financial reports is emphasized to make correct decisions for sustainable profit; businesses must have qualified and confident managers when making decisions, but, according to (Scapens 1990), there are few researched case studies as a research method can help the practice of accounting for the investigation of financial statements. To analyze the audit of financial statements according to (Waterhouse and Tiessen 1978), the organizational structure (evolution and emergence in human behavior) and the efficient design of accounting systems increase the sustainability of business profit. According to (Lucianetti et al. 2018), businesses must analyze unforeseen factors (decentralization and environmental uncertainty) as they play an important role in the sustainability of profit, while, related to the organizational strategy to have sustainability, future investigations should be done since there was no strong correlation. A similar opinion, but related to the research being done by academics, there are gaps caused by low research performance in this field and that the discipline is facing a continuous decline emphasized by (Argilés and Garcia-Blandon 2011) according to (Azudin and Mansor 2018) and (Merchant 2008), where there is a gap in the accounting literature from the perspective of a developing economy by elaborating the current stages of development of business and the impact of three factors (structure, potential, and technology) on business profit sustainability. However, according to (Robu and Istrate 2015), the issue of harmonizing national financial reporting standards with international financial reporting standards to guarantee homogeneity and comparability of reported information is mandatory. To investigate the impact of the timelines of the audited financial statements on business sustainability (Ha et al. 2018), it is pointed out that financial leverage and industry do not affect the timing of financial reports; it is also emphasized that there are differences between businesses at the time of publication of financial reports. To investigate the effect of financial reporting ambiguity and audit quality (Chae et al. 2020), a business with opaque (weak) financial reporting increases the risk of the volatility of a company’s profit and its prosperity. According to (De Villiers and Molinari 2022), (Mardi et al. 2020), and (Al-Ajmi 2008), it is pointed out that for businesses to have a sustainable profit, their financial statements must be clear, stable, reliable and open-access for everyone; on the contrary, hiding information, blaming others, refusing to admit that there are problems, and refusal to address problems affect profit volatility, so business leaders can apply these lessons to crisis management in their companies. To investigate the relationship between reliability, the complexity of audited financial statements, and market reactions, according to (Alduais et al. 2022), the most complex financial reports are associated with lower current returns, and they negatively affect sustainable earnings or the expectation of future returns. To investigate the impact of the work of auditors on the management of business profits between two periods of the global financial crisis and its consequences, according to (Ghafran et al. 2022), the workload of the auditor harms the quality of income, where it is suggested that auditors working in some companies are less effective and that they should consider the importance of jurisdiction related to governance to have sustainability of profit. According to (Ghafran et al. 2022), the main concerns for businesses are the lack of choice in audit firms and the issues related to their governance and accountability. A similar opinion regarding these concerns and especially in the audit fees of the financial statements is emphasized by (Goddard and Schmidt 2021), labeling the negative implications for the quality of the audit and the damage to the auditor–client relationship, but, according to (Humphrey and Moizer 1990), the professional behavior of the audit and the ability of the auditors serve the function of protecting the interests of the country.

3. Investigating Variables of Audited Financial Statements in Businesses (TASS, IASS, TLIA, TREV, and NFI) for Sustainable Profit in Businesses toward a Circular Economy

Regarding the investigation of audited financial statements in businesses, taking into account all the independent variables, contributions were made by many researchers emphasizing their importance in the sustainability of profit. Therefore, the availability of electronic data, including (activators, smart devices, tags, integrated computers, and mobile devices), for accounting statements is of great importance, and every day their importance is increasing to make an audit of the highest quality (Tan et al. 2018). The study of (Kacani et al. 2022) took into consideration the benchmarking instrument, which indicated that those sub-industries performing better both in short- and long-term risk display a higher outsourcing potential and more opportunities for integration in global value chains. To investigate the impact of all variables on the sustainability of profit, the financial position of the business in the market, and the reforms in the financial statements through the accounting of the audited financial statements, according to (Lulaj 2021a), (Lulaj 2021b), the impact of accounting on the preparation of financial statements is becoming more and more necessary, that large businesses have a better financial position compared to small businesses, and that insolvency is greater among small businesses. Regarding the variable of intangible assets (IASS), according to (Hu et al. 2022), foreign ownership increases with the increase in intangible assets. According to (Uddin et al. 2022), intangible assets provide competitive advantages and increase business productivity and efficiency. However, corporate resilience to the shocks of COVID-19 highlights the critical role of intangible assets, whereas, according to (Lim et al. 2020), a significant and growing part of corporate assets consists of non-recourse assets; high risk of evaluation and the weak collateralization of some intangible assets (goodwill) may discourage debt financing. Furthermore, businesses that use recent changes in accounting rules are allowed to observe market-based valuations of intangible assets. Regarding the total assets variable (TASS), according to (Wang 2022), emphasizing that the optimal choice of the portfolio of risk-averse entrepreneurs in a costly state-verification framework, according to the analyzed model, it is concluded that opposite responses of the firm’s leverage and share are generated assets that are consistent with empirical evidence.

4. The Impact of Profit Sustainability in Businesses for Financial Accounting Items

To investigate the impact of profit sustainability in businesses for financial accounting items, according to (Caddy 2000), there has been a focus on the intellectual assets of the business and to some extent on an equivalence between intellectual assets and intellectual capital where, with each debit (in the sense of increase), the possibility of a loan (in the sense of a reduction) must be allowed. According to (Zambon et al. 2020), the financial value is related to the generation of net cash flows over time to have appreciable profit in businesses. According to (Ellis et al. 2022), financial reporting for general purposes has evolved to meet the needs of existing and potential investors, as well as creditors, providing information related to the evaluation and expected return, time, and uncertainty of future monetary flows, as well as the care of the management on the economic resources of the company. Financial reporting and ESG have also emerged to meet information needs in recognition of the fact that sound financial decisions are based on broader analyses than those derived from financial information. The research field of accounting information systems (AIS) emerged about 30 years ago as a subfield of accounting, but it is in danger of developing further as an isolated discipline, according to (Jans et al. 2023). According to (Haji et al. 2023), on balance, a significant number of questions remain on the net effects of CSR reporting regulations.
In this case, to investigate the competition within the external market and the phenomena of the tendering of the audits of financial statements (Beattie and Fearnley 1998), the development of a competitive tender and the examination of the change of the auditor strengthen the stability of the business in the market. However, according to (He et al. 2016), poor audit quality and high fees harm the sustainability of business profit. To investigate the impact of technology on the sustainability of profit through the analysis of financial statements, according to (Türegün 2019), businesses have taken a step forward in the field of technology and accounting programs, while in the coming years financial reporting will become stronger thanks to learning (training and education of staff), artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the use of big data, showing the transformation of financial reporting with technological changes. A similar opinion was given by (Mohd and Khan 2021), emphasizing the importance of future research in this field. According to (Carcello and Neal 2003), it is very important that businesses do not pressure auditors to modify financial statements, regardless of ongoing issues, as well as not dismiss the auditors from their positions just because they refuse to issue unaltered reports. This is highlighted by (Ishak 2016), emphasizing the importance of responsibility and guidelines in business governance codes according to international accounting and financial reporting standards to have real and sustainable profits, and also in rules and principles (Cao and Coram 2020), as well as in standard No. 5 (Janvrin et al. 2020), as well as according to (Velte 2022), which emphasizes the importance of financial restatements and the usefulness of financial information (Lev 2018) to have profit consistency. To further investigate the impact of technology on the accounting and auditing of business financial statements, according to (Salijeni et al. 2021), technology facilitates the creation of opportunities to provide quality business reports, particularly for the stability of profit, but according to (Castka et al. 2020), technology improves the process of auditing financial statements. According to (Li 2019), the importance of technology at the time of financial reporting, the strengthening of the supervision of accounting statements, the application of technology, and, first of all, the verification of accounting transactions, are emphasized. According to (Mironiuc et al. 2015), the importance of the value of comprehensive income for net income is emphasized to ensure the sustainability of profit. To investigate the impact of human behavior on the production/service or distribution process, according to (Corrado et al. 2009), the productivity and income of workers have decreased significantly over the last 50 years, affecting the sustainability of profit in the business. According to (Iatridis 2016), changing the tone of financial reporting to pessimistic lowers the cost of capital. Furthermore, according to (Ahadiat and Mackie 1993), emphasizing ethics in accounting increases sustainable profit. To investigate the impact of human behavior on the sustainability of profit, according to (Kusnic and Davanzo 1986), businesses should not create income inequality for workers, increasing the need for greater care; furthermore (Allal-Chérif et al. 2023), businesses must make sustainable innovations to achieve excellence in simplicity (Agyei-Boapeah et al. 2022; Alfaro et al. 2019) by eliminating barriers (time or space), as well as by implementing sophisticated software that helps sustainable profit. According to (Macve 2015), accounting and auditing work in different ways within businesses in different countries and cultures. According to (Xu and Xuan 2021), in the current stage of business development, a high level of internal control can facilitate its effectiveness. By (Merello et al. 2022), the digitization process is affecting all markets and increasing consumer awareness of the sustainable behavior of companies to have a sustainable profit (Lin et al. 2021) through the implementation of a strategic attitude to profit-related opportunities based on the strategic systems audit (SSA), according to the researchers’ research (Peecher et al. 2007). According to (Bakre 2008), the financial reporting of a heavy socioeconomic and political technology is emphasized for the colonial and post-colonial era of business globalization. Therefore, the emphasis on the business is complex, and, on speed changes (Hui and Fatt 2007), facing stationary challenges in the chain is related to changes in developing markets (Soundararajan et al. 2021), as well as more sustainability and integration in corporate culture, as well as in profit reporting for interested parties (Rezaee 2016). According to (Chams and García-Blandón 2019), businesses are becoming more and more aware of these aspects every day, based on the well-being of workers (Sun et al. 2020) and their ethical activities (human behavior) before entering the complex world of business (Low et al. 2008). According to (Al-Mana et al. 2020), privatization can lead to improved performance and sustainable profit efficiency as shareholder-owned businesses generally perform better than national players, so this is a topic of continuing interest regarding the relationship between corporate governance and managerial choices (Nazir and Afza 2018), as well as regarding to what extent financial reporting facilitates the allocation of capital to appropriate investment projects to have a sustainable profit (Roychowdhury et al. 2019). According to (Bebbington et al. 2007) and (Lulaj and Iseni 2018), profit sustainability assessment models should be proposed according to cost–volume–profit analysis. According to (Zhang et al. 2021), business solvency, profitability, and development ability are closely related to profit sustainability, fulfilling the intelligent demand for modern financial data analysis in the cloud servers (Bi 2022), and in recent years, businesses have paid more and more attention to business data in the cloud server (Yang 2021). According to (Chen 2022), the lines between financial and managerial accounting to investigate sustainable profit are constantly being mixed as a result of the new economic norm, which is bringing this relationship closer every day, but the continuous progress of economic globalization through science and technology for sustainable profit has become an important direction for the development of businesses to detect entrepreneurial problems and prevent risks (Hou 2022; Panait et al. 2022), since in the current competitive environment, businesses pay the market great importance on financial performance evaluation research, paying attention to workers’ talents to increase sustainable profit (Chen 2021). According to (Yang and Jiang 2020), the hybrid approach greatly improves the accuracy of the data in the accounting financial statements. Regarding the implications of the policy of total assets, according to (McDonough and Yan 2022), businesses must make capital investment decisions based on the state of the total assets of the business.
Regarding the total liabilities variable (TLIA), according to (Colovic et al. 2022), businesses that start operating in the informal sector and later move to the formal sector are less likely to directly receive profit sustainability in the global value chain. According to (Tang and Rowe 2022), the very close connection of the subsidiary to the main company can be potentially harmful to the sustainability of profit. According to (Dawid and Muehlheusser 2022), strict obligations can hinder business investments and their recognition by the market. Regarding the total revenue variable (TREV), according to (Gebauer et al. 2020), businesses with new digital offers are currently using new digital technologies such as the internet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), or big data (BD), but these offerings rarely increase total revenue as businesses are struggling with business dynamics (BD). According to (Kabir and Su 2022), income from contracts with customers affects the practice of recognizing income and financial statements of businesses, while profits use more the modified retrospective method than the full retrospective method. Regarding the variable of the net financial income (NFI), according to (Kabbach-de-Castro et al. 2022), productivity and hindered income jointly direct the distribution of capital within an internal capital market. According to (Villani 2021), various factors can change the values of the index of external financial dependence, and that stability finds less empirical support. To evaluate the circular economy model of a manufacturing company, according to (Chiarot et al. 2022), the reuse and recycling of material should be reduced by focusing on optimizing the performance of assets and helping to improve the sustainable performance of machinery and equipment. According to (Han et al. 2020), a business in a circular economy must be flexible to market changes in response to changes in technology, economy, and environment to achieve sustainability of profit. Regarding the determination of the factors that lead to a short-term orientation strategy to have business profit sustainability in a circular economy, according to (Gerlich 2023), it is very challenging for businesses to transform a long-term strategy into a short-term strategy for stable profit evaluation. According to (Milios 2018), to have sustainability of profit in businesses, one of the main areas of (CE) is repair and reproduction.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/admsci13030072

References

  1. Korhonen, Jouni, Antero Honkasalo, and Jyri Seppälä. 2018. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, Elsevier 143: 37–46.
  2. Wiesmeth, Hans. 2020. Implementing the Circular Economy for Sustainable Development, 1st ed. Dresden: TU Dresden, Faculty of Economics. ISBN 9780128218044.
  3. Balanay, Raquel M., Rowena P. Varela, and Anthony B. Halog. 2022. Chapter 25—Circular economy for the sustainability of the wood-based industry: The case of Caraga Region, Philippines. In Circular Economy and Sustainability. Volume 2: Environmental Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 447–62.
  4. Wójcik-Karpacz, Anna, Jarosław Karpacz, Piotr Brzeziński, Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl, and Bernard Ziębicki. 2023. Barriers and Drivers for Changes in Circular Business Models in a Textile Recycling Sector: Results of Qualitative Empirical Research. Energies 16: 490.
  5. Dantas, Rui Miguel, Aamar Ilyas, José Moleiro Martins, and João Xavier Rita. 2022. Circular Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets through the Lens of Sustainability. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8: 211.
  6. Hysa, Eglantina, Alba Kruja, Naqeeb Ur Rehman, and Rafael Laurenti. 2020. Circular economy innovation and environmental sustainability impact on economic growth: An integrated model for sustainable development. Sustainability 12: 4831.
  7. Rehman, Fazal Ur, Basheer M. Al-Ghazali, and Mohamed Riyazi M. Farook. 2022. Interplay in Circular Economy Innovation, Business Model Innovation, SDGs, and Government Incentives: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistani, Malaysian, and Chinese SMEs. Sustainability 14: 15586.
  8. Popescu, Catalin, Eglantina Hysa, Alba Kruja, and Egla Mansi. 2022. Social Innovation, Circularity and Energy Transition for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices—A Comprehensive Review. Energies 15: 9028.
  9. EFRAG. 2021. Interconnection between Financial and Non-Financial Information. Brussels: European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. Available online: https://www.efrag.org/ (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  10. Karasioğlu, Fehmi, Humayun Humta, and Ibrahim Emre Göktürk. 2021. Investigation of Accounting Ethics Effects on Financial Report Quality & Decision Making: Evidence from Kabul-based Logistic Corporations. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics 8: 122–42.
  11. Scapens, Robert W. 1990. Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review 22: 259–81.
  12. Waterhouse, John H, and Peter Tiessen. 1978. A contingency framework for management accounting systems research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 3: 65–76.
  13. Lucianetti, Lorenzo, Charbel Jose Chiappett Jabbour, Angappa Gunasekaran, and Hengky Latan. 2018. Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms’ performance. International Journal of Production Economics 200: 318–28.
  14. Argilés, Josep M., and Josep Garcia-Blandon. 2011. Accounting Research: A Critical View Of The Present Situation And ProspectsInvestigación En Contabilidad: Una Visión Crítica De La Situación Actual Y Perspectivas. Revista de Contabilidad 14: 9–34.
  15. Azudin, Afirah, and Noorhayati Mansor. 2018. Management accounting practices of SMEs: The impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pacific Management Review 23: 222–26.
  16. Merchant, Kenneth A. 2008. Why interdisciplinary accounting research tends not to impact most North American academic accountants. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19: 901–8.
  17. Robu, Ioan Bogdan, and Costel Istrate. 2015. The Analysis of the Principal Components of the Financial Reporting in the Case of Romanian Listed Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance 20: 553–61.
  18. Ha, Hoang Thi Viet, Dang Ngoc Hung, and Nguyen Thi Thanh Phuong. 2018. The Study of Factors Affecting the Timeliness of Financial Reports: The Experiments on Listed Companies in Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review 8: 294–307.
  19. Chae, Soo-Joon, Makoto Nakano, and Ryosuke Fujitani. 2020. Financial Reporting Opacity, Audit Quality and Crash Risk: Evidence from Japan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 9–17.
  20. De Villiers, Charl, and Matteo Molinari. 2022. How to communicate and use accounting to ensure buy-in from stakeholders: Lessons for organizations from governments’ COVID-19 strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 35: 20–34.
  21. Mardi, Mardi, Petrolis Nusa Perdana, Suparno Suparno, and Imam Aris Munandar. 2020. Effect of Accounting Information Systems, Teamwork, and Internal Control on Financial Reporting Timeliness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 809–18.
  22. Al-Ajmi, Jasim. 2008. Audit and reporting delays: Evidence from an emerging market. Advances in Accounting 24: 217–26.
  23. Alduais, Fahd, Nashat Ali Almasria, Abeer Samara, and Ali Masadeh. 2022. Conciseness, Financial Disclosure, and Market Reaction: A Textual Analysis of Annual Reports in Listed Chinese Companies. International Journal of Financial Studies 10: 104.
  24. Ghafran, Chaudhry, Noel O’Sullivan, and Sofia Yasmin. 2022. When does audit committee busyness influence earnings management in the UK? Evidence on the role of the financial crisis and company size. Journal of International Accounting 47: 100467.
  25. Goddard, Francis, and Martin Schmidt. 2021. Exploratory insights into audit fee increases: A field study into board member perceptions of auditor pricing practices. International Journal of Auditing 25: 637–60.
  26. Humphrey, Christopher, and Peter Moizer. 1990. From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1: 217–38.
  27. Tan, Qing, Nashwa El-Bendary, Magdy A. Bayoumi, Xiaokun Zhang, Javier Sedano, and José R. Villar. 2018. Emerging Technologies: IoT, Big Data, and CPS with Sensory Systems. Journal of Sensors 2018: 3407542.
  28. Kacani, Jolta, Lindita Mukli, and Eglantina Hysa. 2022. A framework for short- vs. long-term risk indicators for outsourcing potential for enterprises participating in global value chains: Evidence from Western Balkan countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 401.
  29. Lulaj, Enkeleda. 2021a. Accounting, Reforms and Budget Responsibilities in the Financial Statements. Accounting and Finance/Oblik i Finansi 21: 61–69.
  30. Lulaj, Enkeleda. 2021b. Quality and reflecting of financial position: Anenterprises model through logistic regression andnatural logarithm. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 10: 26–50.
  31. Hu, Tiancheng, Rui Guo, and Lutao Ning. 2022. Intangible assets and foreign ownership in international joint ventures: The moderating role of related and unrelated industrial agglomeration. Research in International Business and Finance 61: 101654.
  32. Uddin, Mohammad Riaz, Mostafa Monzur Hasan, and Nour Abadi. 2022. Do intangible assets provide corporate resilience? New evidence from infectious disease pandemics. Economic Modelling 110: 105806.
  33. Lim, Steve C., Antonio J. Macias, and Thomas Moeller. 2020. Intangible assets and capital structure. Journal of Banking & Finance 118: 105873.
  34. Wang, Chenxi. 2022. Firm asset structure and risk aversion. Economics Letters 221: 110913.
  35. Caddy, Ian. 2000. Intellectual capital: Recognizing both assets and liabilities. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1: 129–46.
  36. Zambon, Stefano, Giuseppe Marzo, Laura Girella, Mario Abela, and Nicola D’Albore. 2020. Academic Report. A Literature Review on the Reporting of Intangibles. Brussels: EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group).
  37. Ellis, Charles, Eu-Lin Fang, Katharina Baudouin-Goerlitz, Ruoyu Wen, Fengying Ye, Shi Li, and C. A. Jyoti Singh. 2022. ESG Reporting White Paper. Australia: Division 3 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Available online: https://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/-/media/project/cpa/corporate/documents/tools-and-resources/environmental-social-governance/esg-reporting-white-paper-2022.pdf?icid=copy-internal-page-banner (accessed on 12 January 2023).
  38. Jans, Mieke, Banu Aysolmaz, Maarten Corten, Anant Joshi, and Mathijs van Peteghem. 2023. Digitalization in accounting–Warmly embraced or coldly ignored? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 36: 61–85.
  39. Haji, Abdifatah Ahmed, Paul Coram, and Indrit Troshani. 2023. Consequences of CSR reporting regulations worldwide: A review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 36: 177–208.
  40. Beattie, Vivien, and Stella Fearnley. 1998. Audit Market Competition: Auditor Changes And The Impact Of Tendering. The British Accounting Review 30: 261–89.
  41. He, Xianjie, Jeffrey A. Pittman, and Oliver M. Rui. 2016. Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality? Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2868205 (accessed on 14 November 2016).
  42. Türegün, Nida. 2019. Impact of technology in financial reporting: The case of Amazon Go. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 30: 90–95.
  43. Mohd, Yunika Murdayanti, and Noor Azli Ali Khan. 2021. The development of internet financial reporting publications: A concise of bibliometric analysis. Heliyon 7: e08551.
  44. Carcello, Joseph V., and Terry L. Neal. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals Following “New” Going-Concern Reports. The Accounting Review 78: 95–117.
  45. Ishak, Suhaimi. 2016. Going-concern Audit Report: The Role of Audit Committee. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6: 36–39. Available online: http://www.econjournals.com/ (accessed on 1 May 2016).
  46. Cao, June, and Paul J. Coram. 2020. Auditors’ Response to Different Reporting Environments: Experimental Evidence From the Quantity and Quality of Auditors’ Evidence Demands in China. Internationa Journal of Auditing 24: 73–89.
  47. Janvrin, Diane J., Maureen Francis Mascha, and Melvin A. Lamboy-Ruiz. 2020. SOX 404(b) Audits: Evidence from Auditing the Financial Close Process of the Accounting System. Journal of Information Systems 34: 77–103.
  48. Velte, Patrick. 2022. The impact of external auditors on frms’ fnancial restatements: A review of archival studies and implications. Management Review Quarterly.
  49. Lev, Baruch. 2018. The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research 48: 465–93.
  50. Salijeni, George, Anna Samsonova-Taddei, and Stuart Turley. 2021. Understanding How Big Data Technologies Reconfigure the Nature and Organization of Financial Statement Audits: A Sociomaterial Analysis. European Accounting Review 30: 531–55.
  51. Castka, Pavel, Cory Searcy, and Jakki Mohr. 2020. Technology-enhanced auditing: Improving veracity and timeliness in social and environmental audits of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 20773.
  52. Li, Jun. 2019. Research on Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis Based on Data of Listed Companies. In Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, Volume 110. 5th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2019). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press SARL.
  53. Mironiuc, Marilena, Mihai Carp, and Ionela-Corina Chersan. 2015. The Relevance of Financial Reporting on the Performance of Quoted Romanian Companies in the Context of Adopting the IFRS. Procedia Economics and Finance 20: 404–13.
  54. Corrado, Carol, Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel. 2009. Intangible capital and u.s. economic growth. The Review of Income and Wealth 55: 661–85.
  55. Iatridis, George Emmanuel. 2016. Financial reporting language in financial statements: Does pessimism restrict the potential for managerial opportunism? International Review of Financial Analysis 45: 1–17.
  56. Ahadiat, Nasrollah, and James Jay Mackie. 1993. Ethics education in accounting: An investigation of the importance of ethics as a factor in the recruiting decisions of public accounting firms. Journal of Accounting Education 11: 243–57.
  57. Kusnic, Michael W., and Julie Davanzo. 1986. Accounting for non-market activities in the distribution of income: An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics 21: 211–27.
  58. Allal-Chérif, Oihab, Juan Costa Climent, and Klaus Jurgen Ulrich Berenguer. 2023. Born to be sustainable: How to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business. Journal of Business Research 154: 113379.
  59. Agyei-Boapeah, Henry, Richard Evans, and Tahir MNisar. 2022. Disruptive innovation: Designing business platforms for new financial services. Journal of Business Research 150: 134–46.
  60. Alfaro, Emigdio, Fei Yu, Naqeeb Ur Rehman, Eglantina Hysa, and Patrice Kandolo Kabeya. 2019. Strategic management of innovation. In The Routledge Companion to Innovation Management. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 107–68.
  61. Macve, Richard H. 2015. Fair value vs conservatism? Aspects of the history of accounting, auditing, business and finance from ancient Mesopotamia to modern China. The British Accounting Review 47: 124–41.
  62. Xu, Xingmei, and Chao Xuan. 2021. A study on the motivation of financialization in emerging markets: The case of Chinese nonfinancial corporations. International Review of Economics & Finance 72: 606–23.
  63. Merello, Paloma, Antonio Barberá, and Elena Dela Pozab. 2022. Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174: 121290.
  64. Lin, Han, Lu Chen, Mingchuan Yu, Chao Li, Joseph Lampel, and Wan Jiang. 2021. Too little or too much of good things? The horizontal S-curve hypothesis of green business strategy on firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121051.
  65. Peecher, Mark E., Rachel Schwartz, and Ira Solomon. 2007. It’s all about audit quality: Perspectives on strategic-systems auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32: 463–85.
  66. Bakre, Owolabi M. 2008. Financial reporting as technology that supports and sustains imperial expansion, maintenance and control in the colonial and post-colonial globalisation: The case of the Jamaican economy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19: 487–522.
  67. Hui, Loi Teck, and Quek Kia Fatt. 2007. Strategic organizational conditions for risks reduction and earnings management: A combined strategy and auditing paradigm. Accounting Forum 31: 179–201.
  68. Soundararajan, Vivek, Sreevas Sahasranamam, Zaheer Khan, and Tanusree Jain. 2021. Multinational enterprises and the governance of sustainability practices in emerging market supply chains: An agile governance perspective. Journal of World Business 56: 101149.
  69. Rezaee, Zabihollah. 2016. Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature 36: 48–64.
  70. Chams, Nour, and Josep García-Blandón. 2019. On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 141: 109–22.
  71. Sun, Xuan Sean, Ahsan Habib, and Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan. 2020. Workforce environment and audit fees: International evidence. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 16: 100182.
  72. Low, Mary, Howard Daveya, and Keith Hooper. 2008. Accounting scandals, ethical dilemmas and educational challenges. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19: 222–54.
  73. Al-Mana, Ali A., Waqas Nawaz, Athar Kamal, and Muammer Koҫ. 2020. Financial and operational efficiencies of national and international oil companies: An empirical investigation. Resources Policy 68: 101701.
  74. Nazir, Mian Sajid, and Talat Afza. 2018. Does managerial behavior of managing earnings mitigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm value? Evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal 4: 139–56.
  75. Roychowdhury, Sugata, Nemit Shroff, and Rodrigo S. Verdi. 2019. The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review. Journal of Accounting and Economics 68: 101246.
  76. Bebbington, Jan, Judy Brown, and Bob Frame. 2007. Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics 61: 224–36.
  77. Lulaj, Enkeleda, and Etem Iseni. 2018. Role of Analysis CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit) as Important Indicator for Planning and Making Decisions in the Business Environment. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies 4: 99–114.
  78. Zhang, Wenyao, Ruzhi Xu, and Lu Wang. 2021. Investigating the Complex Relationship between Financial Performance and Company’s Green Behavior: A Comparative Analysis. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2021: 9979835.
  79. Bi, Yulin. 2022. Financial Accounting Information Data Analysis System Based on Internet of Things. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022: 6162504.
  80. Yang, Lin. 2021. Cloud Data Integrity Verification Algorithm for Sustainable Accounting Informatization. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021: 2330502.
  81. Chen, Xiaowei. 2022. The Fusion Model of Financial Accounting and Management Accounting Based on Neural Networks. Mobile Information Systems 2022: 1587274.
  82. Hou, Xuechen. 2022. Design and Application of Intelligent Financial Accounting Model Based on Knowledge Graph. Mobile Information Systems 2022: 8353937.
  83. Panait, Mirela, Eglantina Hysa, Lukman Raimi, Alba Kruja, and Antonio Rodriguez. 2022. Guest editorial: Circular economy and entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 14: 673–77.
  84. Chen, Ziyue. 2021. Research on Accounting Intelligence System Modeling of Financial Performance Evaluation. Security and Communication Networks 2021: 5550382.
  85. Yang, Ruicheng, and Qi Jiang. 2020. Detecting Falsified Financial Statements Using a Hybrid SM-UTADIS Approach : Empirical Analysis of Listed Traditional Chinese Medicine Companies in China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2020: 8865489.
  86. McDonough, Ryan P., and Claire J. Yan. 2022. Accounting policies in the public sector: Characteristics and consequences of accounting for capital assets. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 42: 107033.
  87. Colovic, Ana, Bisrat A. Misganaw, and Dawit Z. Assefa. 2022. Liability of informality and firm participation in global value chains. Journal of World Business 57: 101279.
  88. Tang, Jianyun, and W. Glenn Rowe. 2022. The liability of closeness: Business relatedness and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of World Business 47: 288–96.
  89. Dawid, Herbert, and Gerd Muehlheusser. 2022. Smart products: Liability, investments in product safety, and the timing of market introduction. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 134: 104288.
  90. Gebauer, Heiko, Alexander Arzt, Marko Kohtamäki, Claudio Lamprecht, Vinit Parida, Lars Witell, and Felix Wortmann. 2020. How to convert digital offerings into revenue enhancement—Conceptualizing business model dynamics through explorative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management 91: 429–41.
  91. Kabir, Humayun, and Li Su. 2022. How did IFRS 15 affect the revenue recognition practices and financial statements of firms? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 49: 100507.
  92. Kabbach-de-Castro, Luiz Ricardo, Guilherme Kirch, and Rafael Mattac. 2022. Do internal capital markets in business groups mitigate firms’ financial constraints? Journal of Banking & Finance 143: 106573.
  93. Villani, Davide. 2021. Revisiting the external financial dependence index in light of the rise of corporate net lending: What do we really measure? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 58: 361–76.
  94. Chiarot, Christian, Robert Eduardo Cooper Ordoñez, and Carlos Lahura. 2022. Evaluation of the Applicability of the Circular Economy and the Product-Service System Model in a Bearing Supplier Company. Sustainability 14: 12834.
  95. Han, Junghee, Almas Heshmati, and Masoomeh Rashidghalam. 2020. Circular Economy Business Models with a Focus on Servitization. Sustainability 12: 8799.
  96. Gerlich, Michael. 2023. How Short-Term Orientation Dominates Western Businesses and the Challenges They Face—An Example Using Germany, the UK, and the USA. Administrative Sciences 13: 25.
  97. Milios, Leonidas. 2018. Advancing to a Circular Economy: Three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustainability Science 13: 861–78.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback