Information Technology Governance and Bank Performance in Jordan: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Business, Finance
Contributor:
Basheer Ahmad Khamees

Financial performance is identified by return on investment (ROI), return on equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q. Averages of these variables were calculated for five years from 2015 to 2019. In fact, there is evidence for the general argument that banks will improve their performance by implementing information technology governance (ITG).

  • accounting information systems
  • information technology governance
  • effectiveness
  • financial performance
  • banks
  • Jordan

1. Introduction

The banking sector in Jordan witnessed great development since the 1970s, whether by increasing the number of banks operating in the sector, increasing the number of operating bank branches, or increasing the number of services provided by these banks. According to the Association of Banks in Jordan, the number of ATMs belonging to the Jordanian banking sector increased from 377 at the end of 2000 to 1023 at the end of 2009. The number of ATMs continued to increase until it reached 2038 ATMs at the end of 2019. In addition, banks operated through 862 branches at the end of 2019. The total number of branches was 446 at the end of 2000 and 619 at the end of 2009. In addition, there is a remarkable growth in the volume of deposits with banks, an increase in credit facilities, and an increase in the volume of their assets. Additionally, not only that, but the sector witnessed a development in financial policies and a shift towards liberalizing the interest rate, which is expected to lead to an increase in the demand for savings and in turn an increase in deposits with banks, which may increase the investment ability of these banks. Hopefully this will improve banking performance.
Much of the empirical work shows that market concentration leads to high profitability, and highly concentrated markets tend to be less competitive than markets in which many small organizations operate. Moreover, a concentrated market enables market practices to collude and to protect their market position with strategic behavior (Khan and Hanif 2019). Therefore, competition is particularly important in the banking sector because it affects the performance of practices. According to the structure-performance hypothesis, the structure of the market determines the degree of competition in the market and the degree of competition affects the performance of banks.
Information technology is expected to help banks by reducing costs, managing risks, predicting crises, achieving customer satisfaction, and promoting and diversifying services, this in turn would positively affect the financial performance of banks. However, to achieve the desired goals of information technology, there must be rules, procedures, and mechanisms that govern this technology, which are called information technology governance. It aims to ensure effective utilization of information technology (IT) by focusing on performance measurement, strategic alignment, resource management, risk management, and value delivery (Wilkin and Chenhall 2010), and this goes beyond focusing on investing in information technology only. It is worth noting that there is no consensus about the definition of ITG, although studies in the area, such as Simonsson and Johnson (2005) and Wu et al. (2015), include several definitions of ITG.
There is evidence for the general argument that banks will improve their performance by implementing ITG (Lunardi et al. 2014; Prasad et al. 2010; Weill and Ross 2004; Weill 2004). However, empirical evidence supporting this relation between ITG and bank performance is quite limited especially in emerging markets. In addition, performance impact may be affected by the proper match between ITG and the situational factors that exist in the environment of the corporation. These factors play critical roles in affecting how ITG impacts bank performance. An example that supports this perspective is the literature of the field of IT value in which it is well documented that situational factors affect the relationship between IT and the bank performance (e.g., Cao 2010; Kohli and Grover 2008; Grant 2005; Tanriverdi 2005; Melville et al. 2004; Brynjolfsson 2003; Barney 2001). It should be emphasized that using IT guarantees neither the existence of ITG nor the effectiveness of ITG (if it exists).

2. ITG and Performance

It is presumed that banks that seek to improve their performance are working hard to develop their capabilities in line with the level of competition they are exposed to in the market. That is, there should be a match between these resources and the level of competition to improve their performance. One of the important resources that banks depend on, to improve their competitive position in the market, is information technology. However, in order for this technology to be mature and helpful in achieving goals, it must be in harmony with the business, which can be achieved by setting the foundations and standards for the governance of information technology. De Haes and Van Grembergen (2009) found that there is a positive relationship between ITG and business/IT alignment. It is also assumed that the existence of proper governance to these capabilities aids in maximizing the utilization of these capabilities. Furthermore, in the same context, Dixit and Panigrahi (2014) show that the effect of increasing investment in information technology leads to higher profits for enterprises with higher exports. Dadoukis et al. (2021) show that banks with high IT investment performed better, in terms of market returns, Tobin’s q and lending, than other banks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arora and Arora (2013) found that investment in information technology has had a significant positive impact on the profitability of the Indian public sector. Ho and Mallick (2010) found that although investment in information technology improves the work of banks, it may increase the level of competition between banks.
However, it should be emphasized that improving performance requires not only the use of IT capabilities but also having the suitable ITG that is composed of these capabilities. Zhang et al. (2016) states that the stronger the ITG is, the more likely that the bank becomes an IT leader. Soliman and Zaky (2017) found that ITG mediates the effect of IT investment on the financial and non-financial performance of Egyptian banks. It is worth noting that having the ability to measure ITG helps achieve this goal, such as the methodology of Weill and Ross (2004), which depends on measuring governance by linking the importance of the desired goals of using information technology and the success of companies in achieving these goals. In this context, the extent to which managers are aware of the importance of these goals for their companies and the success of these companies in achieving these goals can be questioned, and this is one of several things that the current study seeks to test.
Ko and Fink (2010) found that one of the large gaps between theory and practice that needs attention is increasing the awareness and understanding of the concept of ITG among senior managers. They consider that chief information officers (CIOs) or information technology directors of organizations are the key personnel involved in ITG. They argue that ITG can be seen as an integral part of corporate governance that needs the attention and care of senior management. This argument demands that there is a coherence between IT directors and the other senior managers in banks in dealing with ITG in order for the bank to achieve its desired objective. In addition, Weill and Hoffmann (2007) referred to measuring the awareness of CIO compared to the other senior managers in a regional New England bank concerning the importance of ITG elements. 

3. Banks Performance

Interest in the performance of banks has been the focus of researchers around the world. Among this interest is the focus on the factors that could improve it, which has led to the emergence of many studies that seek to accomplish this task. For example, Muller and Watkins-Fassler (2021) found that banks’ performance, in Curacao, is negatively affected by gender diversity and board size and it is positively affected by multiple directorships. Baugh et al. (2021) found that material weaknesses in internal control are negatively associated with future bank performance, which means that internal control quality improves the bank’s performance. Hoang et al. (2021) found that bank performance in Vietnam is improved by both geographic and income diversification strategies. However, their results showed that the interaction of these two variables together leads to a negative impact on the performance of banks. That is because adapting geographical diversification with diversification in income leads to increased competition which in turn reduces performance.

4. Competition and Performance

It is well established, conceptually and empirically, within the previous literature that intensity of competition is a fundamental problem for corporations. It plays an active role in the design of a company’s accounting information system (Wallace 2013). In addition, it urges the bank to be efficient in the business it carries out. Arrawatia et al. (2015) found that increased competition in the Indian market can positively affect efficiency levels in the banking industry and vice-versa. Tian et al. (2020) found that an increase in competition leads to an improvement in innovation efficiencies, whether through the investment in R&D or in terms of the resulted patents and profits generated by R&D. Căpraru et al. (2021) also state that when competition is at a low level, this leads to an increase in the tendency of banks to take risks, which destabilizes the banking sector. This result agrees with the study of Aldomy et al. (2020), which found that increase concentration leads to higher risk in the Jordanian banking sector. However, it is necessary here to emphasize that the decrease in concentration may not necessarily lead to an increase in competition. The result of Demirgüç-Kunt and Martínez Pería’s (2010) study should be recalled here, which found that a decrease in concentration did not lead to an increase in competition in the same sector.
In the study by Alhassan and Ohene-Asare (2016), which was conducted on the Ghanaian banking industry, it was found that competition improves the cost efficiency of banks positively. This result is consistent with the results of El Moussawi and Mansour (2022), who found that competition increases both cost efficiency and stability of commercial banks operating in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Wibowo (2017) reveals that banking competition in ASEAN countries, especially in Indonesia, tend to be a monopolistic competition. Wibo found that banking competition decreases banking profitability while it does not affect banking efficiency. Carlson and Mitchener (2006) found that branch banking increases competition, which in turn improves the stability of the banking system by removing inefficient and weak banks. Canta et al. (2020) found that competition affects risk exposure positively. In addition, they found that competition decreases interest rates and increases loan volumes. However, they found that competition leads to difficulty in obtaining loans for small and newly established companies.
It can be seen from the literature above that there has been no attempt to empirically examine the effect of a competitive environment on ITG, let alone the effect of the matching between ITG and company’s competitive intensity on the bank’s performance. It is expected that the effectiveness of ITG will increase when the bank’s competitive intensity is high because banks nowadays rely heavily on electronic services to increase their market share and thus increase their competitiveness, it is presumed that a greater interest in ITG should accompany this. On the contrary, the expansion in using IT could lead to a lack of control of it.

5. The Role of Situational Factors

It can be said that the effect of ITG on bank performance may also be affected by contingency factors, of which competition is one. Concerning this situational factor, banks are assumed to achieve a proper match between competition that they face in the market and the level of ITG to improve their financial performance.
It is well known that AIS is concerned with providing accurate, relevant, and cost-effective information in a timely manner to support business activities and processes. In this way AIS enables banks to be economically and socially effective in their competitive environment (Wilkin and Chenhall 2010). Mia and Clarke (1999) found that information mediates the relationship between competition and performance. By using information, organizations can face competition in the market effectively, and in turn improve their performance. Furthermore, the proper utilization of IT in improving the efficiency and the effectiveness of AIS, and in turn the proper ITG, will enable banks to be competitive. This is what Boso et al. (2013) confirm, although they talk about variables that differ from the variables covered by the current study, but they emphasize the need for a link between innovations within the company and the external environmental conditions of the company. They show that the extent to which companies benefit from innovations varies according to the company’s competitive environment, as this benefit increases when competition is high, while these innovations do not work when competition is weak. Kobelsky et al. (2008) found that the effect of IT investments on performance is contingent upon three situational factors, which are size, unrelated diversification, and sales growth. They suggest that their results may help explain the productivity paradox of IT investments. Gordon et al. (2009) found that the relation between enterprise risk management and firm performance is contingent upon five factors, which are environmental uncertainty, industry competition, firm size, firm complexity, and board of directors monitoring. Their basic argument depends on examining the effect of the appropriate match between these contingent variables and enterprise risk management on firm performance. Sirisomboonsuk et al. (2018) found that ITG, project governance, and the alignment between ITG and project governance have a positive effect on project performance.
Zhouhua (2021) reviewed previous literature on situational factors that affect bank performance in China. He found that business strategy and organizational structure positively and significantly affect bank performance. However, regarding competition, Zhouhua found a negative and insignificant effect of competition on bank performance. Saiful (2017) found that the effect of enterprise risk management and credit risk management on Indonesian bank performance is strengthened in large banks and in banks operating in higher environmental uncertainty. In addition, Sailul found that this effect is also strengthened by higher complexity and lower independent board monitoring. Jungo et al. (2022) examined how the effect of financial regulation on competitiveness and financial inclusion is moderated by financial stability in the banking sector in 15 countries in the South Africa Development Community region and eight countries in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation region. They found that financial regulation obstructs financial inclusion and negatively affects competitiveness. They also found that financial stability strengthened the negative effect of financial regulation on competitiveness and financial inclusion. Finally, Wu et al. (2015) found that the strategic alignment mediates the relationship between ITG and performance. Maji and Hazarika (2018) examined the influence of competition on the association between regulatory capital of Indian banks and their risk-taking behavior. They found a negative effect of competition on risk, which suggests that improving operational efficiency is vital in competitive markets.
Therefore, it is expected that the effect of ITG on a bank’s performance will increase when the company’s ITG is highly matched with its competitive intensity. That is because competitive intensity should motivate the company to increase its ITG effectiveness in order to be competitive, and it should affect the design of the bank’s ITG system in a way that improves its performance.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijfs11010044

References

  1. Khan, Mahmood Ul Hasan, and Muhammad Nadim Hanif. 2019. Empirical evaluation of ‘structure-conduct-performance’and ‘efficient-structure’paradigms in banking sector of Pakistan. International Review of Applied Economics 33: 682–96.
  2. Wilkin, Carla L., and Robert H. Chenhall. 2010. A Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems. Journal of Information Systems 24: 107–46.
  3. Simonsson, Mårten, and Pontus Johnson. 2005. Defining IT Governance—A Consolidation of Literature. In CAiSE’06: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, vol. 6.
  4. Wu, Shelly Ping-Ju, Detmar W. Straub, and Ting-Peng Liang. 2015. How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers. MIS Quarterly 39: 497–518.
  5. Lunardi, Guilherme Lerch, Joao Luiz Becker, Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, and Pietro Cunha Dolci. 2014. The Impact of Adopting IT Governance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis Among Brazilian Firms. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 15: 66–81.
  6. Prasad, Acklesh, Jon Heales, and Peter Green. 2010. A Capabilities-Based Approach to Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Information Technology Governance Effectiveness: Evidence from IT Steering Committees. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 15: 214–32.
  7. Weill, Peter, and Jeanne W. Ross. 2004. IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston: Harvard Business School.
  8. Weill, P. 2004. Don’t Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT. MIS Quarterly Executive 3: 1–17.
  9. Cao, Guangming. 2010. A Four-Dimensional View of IT Business Value. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27: 267–84.
  10. Kohli, Rajiv, and Varun Grover. 2008. Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9: 23–39.
  11. Grant, Robert M. 2005. Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  12. Tanriverdi, Hüseyin. 2005. Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of multibusiness Firms. MIS Quarterly 29: 311–34.
  13. Melville, Nigel, Kenneth Kraemer, and Vijay Gurbaxani. 2004. Review: Information Technology and Organisational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value. MIS Quarterly 28: 283–322.
  14. Brynjolfsson, Erik. 2003. ROI Valuation: The IT Productivity Gap. Optimize Magazine 2: 26–43.
  15. Barney, Jay B. 2001. Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. The Academy of Management Review 26: 41–56.
  16. De Haes, Steven, and Wim Van Grembergen. 2009. An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management 26: 123–37.
  17. Dixit, Gaurav, and Prabin Panigrahi. 2014. Information technology impact and role of firm age and export activity: An emerging economy context. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 17: 169–87.
  18. Dadoukis, Aristeidis, Maurizio Fiaschetti, and Giulia Fusi. 2021. IT adoption and bank performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Economics Letters 204: 109904.
  19. Arora, Hitesh, and Padmasai Arora. 2013. Effect of investments in information technology on bank performance: Empirical evidence from Indian public sector banks. International Journal of Business Information Systems 13: 400–17.
  20. Ho, Shirley J., and Sushanta Kumar Mallick. 2010. The impact of information technology on the banking industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61: 211–21.
  21. Zhang, Peiqin, Kexin Zhao, and Ram L. Kumar. 2016. Impact of IT governance and IT capability on firm performance. Information Systems Management 33: 357–73.
  22. Soliman, Mohammed, and Ahmed Hamdy Mohamed Zaky. 2017. The Mediating Role of IT Governance Effectiveness between ITG and Financial/Non-Financial Performance: Empirical Research on Egyptian Banking Sector. Non-Financial Performance: Empirical Research on Egyptian Banking Sector, February 7.
  23. Ko, Denise, and Dieter Fink. 2010. Information technology governance: An evaluation of the theory-practice gap. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 10: 662–74.
  24. Weill, Peter, and Francisco Gonzalez-Meza Hoffmann. 2007. Banknorth: Designing IT Governance for a Growth-Oriented Business Evironment. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4526-04 Center for Information Systems Research 350. Available online: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/37282 (accessed on 3 March 2023).
  25. Muller, Sherma, and Karen Watkins-Fassler. 2021. Board composition and bank performance in a small island developing state: The case of Curacao. Estudios Gerenciales 37: 590–600.
  26. Baugh, Matthew, Matthew S. Ege, and Christopher G. Yust. 2021. Internal Control Quality and Bank Risk-Taking and Performance. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 40: 49–84.
  27. Hoang, Khanh, Liem Nguyen, and Son Tran. 2021. Multimarket contact, income diversification and bank performance. International Journal of the Economics of Business 28: 439–55.
  28. Wallace, Sandra. 2013. Competition and Management Accounting Information and Control System Design: Survey of Australian Manufacturing and Service Organisations. Working Paper. Douglas: College of Business, Law and Governance, SSRN 2132763.
  29. Arrawatia, Rakesh, Arun Misra, and Varun Dawar. 2015. Bank competition and efficiency: Empirical evidence from Indian market. International Journal of Law and Management 57: 217–31.
  30. Tian, Lin, Liang Han, and Biao Mi. 2020. Bank competition, information specialization and innovation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 54: 1011–35.
  31. Căpraru, Bogdan, Iulian Ihnatov, and Nicoleta-Livia Pintilie. 2021. Bank competition and risk-taking in the European Union: Evidence of a non-linear relationship. Economic Annals 66: 35–65.
  32. Aldomy, Rakan Fuad, Chan Kok Thim, Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan, and Mariati Binti Norhashim. 2020. Bank concentration and financial risk in Jordan. Montenegrin Journal of Economics 16: 31–44.
  33. Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, and María Soledad Martínez Pería. 2010. A Framework for Analyzing Competition in the Banking Sector: An Application to the Case of Jordan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5499. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  34. Alhassan, Abdul Latif, and Kwaku Ohene-Asare. 2016. Competition and bank efficiency in emerging markets: Empirical evidence from Ghana. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies 7: 268–88.
  35. El Moussawi, Chawki, and Rana Mansour. 2022. Competition, cost efficiency and stability of banks in the MENA region. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 84: 143–70.
  36. Wibowo, Buddi. 2017. Banking Competition Measurement and Banking Sector Performance: Analysis of 4 ASEAN Countries. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi 6: 1–28.
  37. Carlson, Mark, and Kris James Mitchener. 2006. Branch banking, bank competition, and financial stability. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38: 1293–328.
  38. Canta, Chiara, Øivind A. Nilsen, and Simen A. Ulsaker. 2020. Competition in Local Bank Markets: Risk Taking and Loan Supply. Bergen: Mimeo, Norwegian School of Economics.
  39. Mia, Lokman, and Brian Clarke. 1999. Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research 10: 137–58.
  40. Boso, Nathaniel, Vicky M. Story, John W. Cadogan, Milena Micevski, and Selma Kadić-Maglajlić. 2013. Firm innovativeness and export performance: Environmental, networking, and structural contingencies. Journal of International Marketing 21: 62–87.
  41. Kobelsky, Kevin, Starling Hunter, and Vernon J. Richardson. 2008. Information technology, contextual factors and the volatility of firm performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 9: 154–74.
  42. Gordon, Lawrence A., Martin P. Loeb, and Chih-Yang Tseng. 2009. Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28: 301–27.
  43. Sirisomboonsuk, Pinyarat, Vicky Ching Gu, Ray Qing Cao, and James R. Burns. 2018. Relationships between project governance and information technology governance and their impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management 36: 287–300.
  44. Zhouhua, Valliappan Raju. 2021. Strategic Literature Review on contingency factors and bank performance in China. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology 5: 135–44.
  45. Saiful, Saiful. 2017. Contingency factors, risk management, and performance of Indonesian banks. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting 9: 35.
  46. Jungo, João, Mara Madaleno, and Anabela Botelho. 2022. Financial regulation, financial inclusion and competitiveness in the banking sector in SADC and SAARC countries: The moderating role of financial stability. International Journal of Financial Studies 10: 22.
  47. Maji, Santi Gopal, and Preeti Hazarika. 2018. Capital regulation, competition and risk-taking behavior of Indian banks in a simultaneous approach. Managerial Finance 44: 459–77.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback