Novel Therapeutic Agents for Management of Diabetes Mellitus: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from insulin resistance, inadequate insulin secretion, or excessive glucagon secretion. DM is a non-infectious disease caused by the disruption of carbohydrate metabolism, which culminates in persistent hyperglycemia.

  • diabetes mellitus
  • therapeutics
  • novel drugs
  • stem cell
  • immunotherapeutic and phytotherapy

1. Introduction

India being the “Diabetes metropolis” of the planet influences almost every community whether it is metropolitan or agrarian [1]. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from insulin resistance, inadequate insulin secretion, or excessive glucagon secretion. DM is a non-infectious disease caused by the disruption of carbohydrate metabolism, which culminates in persistent hyperglycemia [2][3][4]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), DM will be the seventh prime cause of death in 2030 [5]. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) has figured that by 2021, 536.6 million will be living with diabetes, and by 2045, this figure is forecasted to elevate by 46%, reaching 783.2 million [6]. However, the microvascular (stroke, cardiovascular ailment, and peripheral artery disease) and macrovascular (nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy) problems are the two main chronic complications of the disease with the former having more presence than the latter [6]. Owing to the high prevalence of the disease, the poor health consequences and surge in the costs of treatment make it obligatory to focus on early diagnosis with the consequent alterations in the management of DM [6].
With reference to insulin deficiency, DM has been grouped into type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus/juvenile-onset diabetes associated with the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells and is present in 5–10% of diabetic patients [1]. These patients require insulin shots for the maintenance of blood glucose levels and are associated with other autoimmune disorders like autoimmune hepatitis, grave’s disease, vitiligo, Addison’s disease, myasthenia gravis, pernicious anemia, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis [7]. T1DM is hereditary in nature and the occurrence rate of T1DM differs globally, depending on the interplay between genetic susceptibility and various environmental factors. Lately, it has been reported that increased mortality and morbidity rates for TIDM were allied with low socio-demographic status [8][9] Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also recognized as insulin-nondependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)/mature-onset diabetes is the fourth main reason for deaths in various developed countries along possibilities for cardiac ailments like coronary heart disease and stroke [10]. Idiopathic diabetes covers genetic susceptibility and the requirement for insulin replacement therapy in affected patients is needed of an hour. Some patients of Oriental or Nigerian lineage with T1IDM possess hardly any causative factor, however, remain susceptible to the occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis with insulinopenia [1]. Catamenial hyperglycemia is unimpeded hyperglycemia that is coincident with diabetic ketoacidosis and usually occurs before the commencement of the menstrual cycle in women, hence called catamenial diabetic ketoacidosis [11]. The persistent hyperglycemia results in an increased insulin requirement usually up to four times [12]. However, the pathophysiology still remains unknown [13]. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is observed during pregnancy and occurs due to glucose intolerance subsequently resulting in hyperglycemia with severity levels of variable degrees [14]. It is diagnosed during parturiency, influencing 14% of parturient women, and within the US influences 135,000 women yearly [15][16]. A new entrant called “Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults” (LADA) has been added to the diabetes mellitus spectrum [17]. LADA shares characteristics of both T1DM and T2DM, henceforth it has been referred to as T1.5DM. The characteristic features of the disease include an autoimmune response where the body’s immune system attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas, adult onset, gradual onset, and insulin dependency [18]. Recently, researchers have attributed LADA as a sequel of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), where viral determinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) play a role in triggering the autoimmune reaction [19]. It is important for individuals with LADA to work closely with healthcare professionals to manage their condition effectively [20][21].
Conventional treatment of DM involves lifestyle modifications, oral medications, and insulin therapy. Lifestyle modifications include regular physical exercise, dietary management, and weight loss, and lifestyle modification has been reported to be more effective in the management of T2DM compared to T1DM [22]. There is a plethora of oral anti-diabetic drugs available that target various pathogenic hotspots involved in hyperglycemia [23]. The most commonly used oral hyperglycemic drugs include biguanides, which specifically reduce hepatic glycogenolysis and improve peripheral insulin sensitivity [24]. Sulfonylureas are drugs that act on pancreatic β cells and cause the release of insulin [25]. Similarly, thiazolidinediones improve insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues [26]. For patients who cannot achieve glycemic targets through lifestyle modification and oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin therapy has been advocated [27].

2. Current Anti-Diabetes Therapeutic Regimens

The available pharmacotherapy for the treatment of DM includes insulin and various oral hypoglycemic agents like sulfonylureas, metformin, α-glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose and troglitazone), and pioglitazone/rosiglitazone [28] (Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 1. Commercial drugs used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.
Table 2. Sulfonylureas class of drugs used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.
Additionally, thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizers, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, glucagon receptor antagonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors are being used as therapeutic regimens to manage DM [33]. However, these current standard drugs do not restore normal glucose homeostasis for long periods and are associated with adverse consequences like hypoglycemia, kidney diseases, GIT problems, hepatotoxicity, heart risk problems, and insulinoma, which necessities the need for the development of an alternative therapeutic regimen for the management of DM [34]. A comprehensive table of the most commonly used conventional therapeutic agents for the amelioration and cure of diabetes briefing their merits and demerits is given in (Table 1, Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 3. Biguanides class of drugs used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.
Table 4. Thiazolidinediones (TZD) class of drugs used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.
Nowadays, considerable attention is being laid down on the development of novel therapeutic drugs for the management of DM [37]. For instance, medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds have been found to have a variety of therapeutic actions against DM, which include effects on insulin synthesis, increased insulin secretion, amelioration of peripheral resistance, dampening of chronic inflammation associated with DM, and scavenging free radicals [38]. Researchers across various parts of the world are working on the development of personalized medicinal preparations and have proposed various novel preparations against DM [39], the list is ever-increasing and in some cases, the mechanism of action of these formulations has been identified (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic outline of cellular activities of novel candidate drugs proposed to be used as anti-diabetic drugs and their action on various cellular and subcellular structures, which cause decline in levels of blood glucose. GPR119-G protein-coupled receptor-119; gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor: GIPR-; glucagon-like peptide-1: GLP-1-; glucose transporters: GLUT; cyclic adenosine monophosphate: cAMP; protein kinase A: PKA; Ras-related protein Rap-1A: RAP1-A; exchange protein activated by cyclic-AMP: EPAC2; Ras-related protein Rab-3A: RAB-3A; inositol trisphosphate: IP3; diacylglycerol: DAG; protein kinase C: PKC; phospholipase C: PLC.
However, the majority of these studies are at an early stage, and pathogenic hotspots targeted by these novel formulations are very ill-understood. In the current study, an extensive and comprehensive review has been drafted keeping in view the development of novel drugs proposed by various studies. The manuscript is sought to provide comprehensive information on these novel formulations. The findings of this research will give impetus to identifying the most novel regimens for the management of DM and elucidating their mechanisms of action at the cellular level and subcellular levels (Table 5).
Table 5. Novel peptide analogs class of drugs used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.

3. Novel Therapeutic Agents

Current understanding of the pathophysiology of DM from the triumvirate of β cell failure to “ominous octet” has identified multiple pathogenic hotspots in the pathogenesis of DM [12]. Likewise, recognition of the “ominous octet” in the pathogenesis of DM has provided insight into the development of novel therapeutic agents against DM [48]. In a subsequent section of this manuscript discussed the novel therapeutic agents against DM that can be used in the future for effective management of DM, some of these therapeutic agents are in phase 3 of clinical trials and some are in the preclinical phase of development (Table 5 and Table 6).
Table 6. Novel anti-diabetic agents used for management of diabetes mellitus and their associated mechanism of action with advantages and side effects.

3.1. Stem Cell Therapy: An Emerging Arrow for Targeting Diabetes Mellitus

Various scientists working in stem cells established therapeutics pertaining to T1DM via the production of full-grown β cells originating from stem cells [45]. However, it becomes necessary to acquire the type and number of stem cells required for the treatment of the disease as it is an established fact that the pancreas does not have the capability of regeneration [48]. Embryonic stem cells (ESc) have the potential to differentiate into cells mimicking insulin secretagogue activity and various in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed that the transformation of ESc into insulin-like cells results in the improvement of glucose uptake and metabolism [52][53]. Similarly, intravenous (IV) injection of embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) in mice with pancreatic necrosis showed the potential to repair the damaged pancreas in diabetic patients [54] (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The therapeutic landscape: exploring the role of gene therapy, cell immunotherapy, and stem cell therapy in diabetes mellitus [55].
A smart biological system developed from mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the Wharton jelly component of the umbilical cord covered with immunoisolatory microcapsules was observed to restore the β cell population of T1DM patients [56]. Furthermore, significant elevation of the C-peptide stratum was observed after implantation of mesenchymal stem cells in six T2DM patients isolated from the umbilical cord. Consequently, postprandial stability in the serum glucose levels was noticed after 2 h [57]. To advance further, adiponectin, an adipocyte-secreted adipokine was observed to control the mobilization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Adiponectin assisted in BMSC migration from the bone marrow into the circulation to regenerate bone by regulating stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 in a mouse bone defect model and importantly lowered glucose levels and encouraged bone regeneration in mice with diet-induced obesity [29]. Similarly, stem cells labeled with positron emission tomography (PET) tracer fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) to evaluate satisfactory administration methods for these cells in diabetic patients resulted in homing and retention of stem cells in the pancreas. Furthermore, infusion into the superior gastroduodenal artery (superior branch) was found to be the preferred route into the splenic artery as the former method resulted in better homing and retention of labeled stem cells [28]. The mesenchymal stromal cells with the insulin-secreting property isolated from the adipose tissue conjointly with the hematopoietic stem cells extracted from bone marrow, co-infused into the thymic portal circulation and subcutaneous tissue were found to regulate the hyperglycemia in TIDM patients [58]. Subsequent to the incorporation of human eyelid insulin-secreting stem cells (derivatives of adipose tissue), there was a lowering of serum glucose level in T2DM by increasing the insulin level in circulation [59].
The activity of the autoimmune mechanism underlying T1DM can be suppressed by immune ablation. Likewise, for immune ablation, 24 patients underwent transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) with a high dose of cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin. From these studies, it was found that AHSCT leads to a remission of T1DM with good glycemic control [60]. Furthermore, the possible risk factors identified for rejection of AHSCT therapy include levels of C-peptide (fasting), age, and the levels of TNF-α [46]. In the later half of the 19th century, the attention of scientists was directed towards somatic cell-derived pluripotent stem cells (induced). The efficacy of somatic pluripotent cell lines/induced cell lines was reported as a healing technique for T1DM [49][61]. For instance, following the implantation of the altered epithelial cells isolated from the pancreas of non-obese diabetic mice within diabetic mice transformed precisely into insulin-producing cells with further significance in beta cell markers of the pancreas in addition to boosting the insulin release induced by glucose and potassium chloride [61]. To be more precise and accurate, Pancreatic stem cells were evaluated as therapeutic tools for amelioration of DM. In this direction, the intravenous injection of pancreatic stem cells in T1DM patients isolated from fetuses resulted in remarkable elevation of C-peptide levels after 3 months of intravenous injection of pancreatic stem cells [57].

3.2. Transdermal Drug Delivery System (TDDS)

The primary treatment regimen for the management of diabetes still remains the oral hypoglycemic drugs along with insulin injections [62]. Nevertheless, in the last 10 years, the TDDS has received considerable attention as an alternative regimen for the amelioration of diabetes due to its beneficial effects in comparison to the oral forms and injections, which are usually invasive along with being painful [63]. Other than carrying drugs such as insulin and metformin, the TDDS works by analyzing the metabolism via biosensing by evaluating metabolites in biological fluids like sweat [40]. In this direction, ref. [60] designed a biosensor patch by incorporating a microneedle array (3D) for monitoring blood glucose levels. Furthermore, in vitro experiments indicated its stability in long-term use and the potential to check glucose levels even at extreme values. One of the limitations found in the experiment was that the sensitivity in detecting glucose levels decreased as glucose levels increased due to bio-fouling around the electrodes used. Hence, further improvement in the design is required to address this issue.
The development of effective transdermal systems faces challenges but also holds promise for improved patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes [64]. The technological approaches adopted under TDDS include microneedle technology. Under this technology, tiny needles enhance drug delivery by creating microchannels hence improving the permeability of antidiabetic drugs. Likewise, nanoformulations have been used for TDDS of various anti-diabetic drugs, insulin sensitizers, and insulin [65]. Furthermore, innovative techniques, which include iontophoresis and electroporation, utilize electric fields for the penetration of anti-diabetic drugs and insulin [58]. The advantages these approaches offer include non-invasiveness, steady and prolonged release, avoidance of first-pass metabolism, and reduced systemic side effects [66]. As research progresses, the translation of these technologies into clinically viable and widely accepted options remains an exciting avenue for improving diabetes care.

3.3. Nanotechnology

It is well understood that insulin injections used conventionally for TIDM and T2DM are accompanied by painful dispensing and infections which are associated with subsequent low patient care [67]. Hence, to overcome these obstacles, the nanotarget perspective is undertaken, which is gaining tremendous popularity in the present era for being accurate, specific, efficacious, and favorable [14]. Henceforth, nanotechnology has been widely used for the management of DM due to the miniaturization of glucose sensors and closed-loop insulin delivery systems [68]. Accordingly, smart nanoparticles (NPs) as drug delivery systems contain glucose sensors, which help in sensing the glucose level in the body and accordingly help with insulin transportation. These bioengineered molecules contain microcapsules with pores that are small enough to permit the transit of insulin [41]. These nanoparticle formulations have been found to have greater drug bioavailability along with the fact that maximum drugs could be delivered at specific targets. However, their expandability and noxious nature can prove to be dangerous [16]. For instance, a nanotechnology-based insulin delivery system offers precise targeting of pathogenic hotspots involved in the pathogenesis of DM at minimal doses, which improves the pharmacokinetics of insulin with reduced side effects [35]. Furthermore, quantum dots and mesoporous silica nanoparticles, have been employed to develop highly sensitive and selective glucose sensors [44]. Likewise, the integration of nanotechnology in smart insulin delivery systems allows for glucose-responsive insulin release [66]. Despite the significant strides in nanotechnology for diabetes management, challenges such as biocompatibility, long-term safety, and scalability must be addressed for clinical translation.

3.4. Novel Candidate Drugs for Management of DM

3.4.1. Fucoidan

The aquatic ecosystem is well known for the origin of nutraceuticals, cosmetics, and agronomic compounds (24). The various biologically active metabolites isolated from seaweeds (green algae, red algae, and brown algae) have been described to possess a wide range of pharmacological properties [4][7][69][70]. For instance, fucoidan obtained from sea cucumbers is a revolutionary biological sulfated polysaccharide [68][70]. Similarly, Chorda filum, Fucus evanescens, Hizikia fusiforme, Sargassum stenophyllum, Laminaria hyperborean, Caulerpa racemosa, Analipus japonica, Fucus serratus, Padina gymnospora, Ascophyllum nodusum, Fucus vesiculosus, and Kjellmaniella crassifolia have been explored for their fucoidan composition and have gained enormous interest for being agents of diabetes amelioration along with the amelioration of other metabolic diseases. Similarly, fucoidan isolated from the Fucus vesiculosus acts as a glucosidase inhibitor and thus plays a role as an anti-diabetic agent [5][12][70]. Additionally, fucoidan has the capability of reducing diabetic retinopathy by the inhibition of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) signaling [38]. In addition to this, in preclinical studies, fucoidan has been used for the management of diabetes via the alleviation of symptoms associated with the disease [15][34][50][71]. Fucoidan likely alleviates hyperglycemia by regulating activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling together with GLUT-4 action (34). Notably, Fuc-Pg, a fucoidan derived from the Pearsonothuria graeei (molecular weight -310 kDa) can be employed as a functional agent for the treatment of many metabolic disorders [72][73]. Moreover, Fuc-Pg was found to be responsible for the reduction of weight apart from decreasing hyperlipidemia and protecting the liver from steatosis in high-fat-diet-fed mice [63][74].

3.4.2. SGLT-2 (Sodium–Glucose Transporter-2) Inhibitors

Sodium–glucose transporter (SGLT-2) inhibitors, a distinct Na-glucose transporter expressed by epithelia presented around renal proximal tubules comprise one futuristic therapeutic category for T2DM management. They are in greater numbers (around 90%) in the kidney tubular epithelium unlike SGLT-1 isoforms mostly found in intestines [75][76]. They act by barring the renal tubular glucose re-absorption along with showing an insulin discrete approach. Conceptually, these inhibitors could be utilized with the inclusion of other anti-diabetic drugs like insulin [33][77]. At Present, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin are commercially used in diabetic patients. Although this class of drugs has shown benefits, chronic outcomes of using this category of drugs still need to be evaluated (Table 1) [78].

3.4.3. Statin Therapy

Statins are considered novel therapeutic tools for the management and control of diabetes. Statins are categorized under 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A, commonly known as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor [70]. Statins are recognized for the filtering of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and consequently diminishing their level in blood accompanied by the strengthening of blood vessels [79]. Henceforth, they offer the dual advantages of preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD), the most noticeable and prominent consequence of T2DM, and the amelioration of diabetic ketoacidosis. They are familiar lipid-lowering vehicles as they act on the cholesterol genesis pathway by transforming HMG-CoA into mevalonic acids. Importantly, a clinical trial was conducted on 6000 patients given statin therapy, and the study concluded that statin therapy acts on the lipolytic pathway and hence imparts a therapeutic effect by maintaining microvascular integrity, which prevents angiopathy in diabetic patients. However, chronic use was associated with myositis, hepatic disorders, and kidney problems [10][80].
Numerous clinical trials and observational studies have consistently demonstrated the anti-diabetic potential of statins. These drugs effectively lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of hyperglycemia-mediated cellular and subcellular damage. However, concerns have been raised regarding the association between statin therapy and the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Several large-scale studies, including the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) and meta-analyses, have reported a modest increase in the risk of developing diabetes among statin users. Henceforth, decisions to initiate or continue statin therapy should involve a careful assessment of individual age, gender, family history, and baseline glucose metabolism. Based on these assumptions, finding an individualized approach to statin therapy is crucial, taking into consideration the patient’s diabetogenic risk factors. Henceforth, regular monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is recommended, especially in patients with pre-existing risk factors for diabetes.

3.4.4. Quercetin Shielding against Diabetes

Quercetin [28] belongs to flavonoids and has been extracted from many fruits and vegetables like berries, onions, seeds, various nuts, barks, tea, flowers, leaves, and brassica vegetables [7][81]. Recently, pharmacological studies have shown that quercetin has biological properties relating to human health which encompasses protection against CVD, anti-allergic, anti-cancer, anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, and eye protection via avoidance of cataract formation [25][82]. Similarly, the role of quercetin as an antioxidant agent by inhibiting the enzyme xanthine oxidase is not clear. The greater hindrance in the utilization of quercetin is because of its lesser oral bioavailability, which is believed to be because of the presence of the sugar moiety of the molecule [70]. Quercetin has been progressively seen to decrease the complications of diabetes by acting on various signal pathways [4]. Moreover, administration of the different doses of quercetin orally in streptozotocin (STZ) and alloxan-induced diabetes rat models was capable of bringing down the blood glucose levels and glycosylated Hb (HbA1C) [9][68]. Following the oral administration of quercetin in a diabetic rat model, a significant decline in serum glucose levels was observed and the therapeutic mechanism was attributed to restoring the islet of Langerhans, boosting the insulin level in the serum along with stimulating the release of insulin. Furthermore, in T2DM mice models (C57BL/KsJ-db/db) [46] and the high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance model [83], quercetin was observed to reduce the skeletal glucose uptake with subsequently influencing the insulin secretion (glucose-stimulated). It has been hypothesized that the hypoglycemic mechanism of quercetin might be attributed to GLUT (glucose transporter) expression or enhancing the insulin signal transduction via the upregulation of gene/protein expression (Figure 2), together with the phosphorylation of the insulin receptor or insulin receptor substrate. Similarly, quercetin showed a remedial approach against the significant complication of diabetes namely diabetic nephropathy through hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant characteristics [78][84].

3.5. Immunological Approach

Nowadays, immunological therapy has gained immense attraction for treating DM, especially T1DM. Usually, there are two immunological approaches namely non-antigen-specific and antigen-specific ones [76]. The most commonly used immunomodulatory agents gaining popularity include cyclosporine A, cytotoxic T cells, anti-CD3 cells, anti-thymocyte globulin, insulin, heat shock proteins, anti-TNF, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition to these, studies are being conducted on dendritic cells, IL-4, IL-2, regulatory T cells, M2 macrophages, and the amalgam of IL-2 and rapamycin for evaluating their significance in amelioration of T1DM [78]. Among these agents, some of them have been evaluated for the management of T1DM in various animal models [67]. Previously, in the 1980s and 1990s, numerous clinical trials were conducted to look into the efficacy of commonly used immune-suppressive drugs (usually non-antigen-specific) in T1DM [52] with a focus on disrupting the progression and development of DM. On that note, a brief list of commonly used non-antigen-specific immunomodulatory drugs/agents has been described and explained below.

3.5.1. Cyclosporin A (CsA)

Cyclosporine A (calcineurin inhibitor) has been recognized as one of the earliest and primary immunosuppressive drugs attributed to its influential immune suppressant activity against T1DM [46]. It acts via interference with the signal transduction mediated by the TCR (T cell receptors), followed by an interruption in activation of T cells along with the consequent reduction in IL-2 secretion by helper T cells [85]. Nonetheless, there are certain disadvantages of persistent usage in patients with T1DM like cost and significant toxicity of pancreatic β cells [40].
Regulatory T cells (Tregs): Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have shown promise as a potential therapeutic tool in the context of type 1 diabetes (T1D) [19][86]. Tregs play a crucial role in maintaining immune homeostasis by suppressing excessive immune responses and preventing autoimmune reactions [86]. Tregs may help to modulate the immune response to preserve beta cell function. For instance, authors have postulated the use of Tregs as a therapeutic vaccination against T1DM. Similarly, CD4(+) CD25(high)CD127- Tregs have positive outcomes in terms of pancreatic islet survival [23][87].

3.5.2. Rituximab

Antigen-specific immunomodulatory drugs (monoclonal antibody) against B-lymphocyte antigen-CD-20 (surface marker), which is expressed by immature as well as mature B lymphocytes [11]. Recently, a phase II trial was conducted to observe the patency of β cells by the use of rituximab in T1DM. A total of 87 patients with T1DM were administered 4 doses/week of the said drug and one year later, it was observed that the average C-peptide AUC (area under the curve) appears to be elevated in comparison to the placebo group [33].

3.5.3. Anti-TNF-α

These agents are most commonly used as therapeutics for chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis [30]. However, a double-blinded experiment using etanercept (anti-TNF-α) showed lowering the dose of insulin required in the case of children aids in the proliferation of pancreatic β cells [31]. However, recently it was also observed that the anti-TNF-α binds with the TNF-α receptor and henceforth inhibits the advancement and development of DM [30]. These agents have been found to have the potential of deactivating T cells and henceforth inhibit the apoptosis of pancreatic β cells [33].

3.5.4. GAD-65 (Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65)

A single intranasal administration of GAD65 peptides to NOD mice induced a Th2 cell response that inhibits the spontaneous development of autoreactive Th1 responses and the progression of β cell autoimmunity in NOD mice and henceforth reduces pancreatic apoptosis and TIDM incidence [32].

3.5.5. Insulin Secretagogues (TAK-875)

G protein-coupled receptor-40 (GpcR-40) is a surface receptor and it has the highest expression in pancreatic β cells. Activation of GpcR-40 by fatty acids or synthetic ligands stimulates insulin secretion, but only in the presence of elevated glucose concentrations [36]. TAK-875 is a recent addition to novel drugs, these molecules act on GpcR-40 causing hypoglycemia and significantly increasing the insulinogenic index in diabetic patients. Although the candidate molecule was showing encouraging results, owing to hepatoxicity associated with chronic use of the candidate drug, the drug was stopped after the 10th week of phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled 12-week trial [16]. However other GpcR-40 agonists are under consideration in various preclinical and clinical stages for the development of novel drugs against DM. For instance, GPR-119 agonists, which act directly on the β cell and enteroendocrine K- and L cells to increase insulin and incretin secretion, respectively, have shown promise [83].

3.6. Ethno-Medicine

India is known for its traditional medicinal systems (Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani) and is considered the garden of the world for growing a larger variety of herbs. Globally, there are around 21,000 herbs mentioned by WHO that have a broad range of pharmacological properties along with functional chemical components involved in the treatment and control of DM [27] These bioactive compounds isolated from the plant source are economically feasible, having less adverse effects along with being affordable by any class of society [78]. These bioactive compounds are employed on a larger scale due to their anti-diabetic properties viz. hypoglycemic effects in contrast to conventional drugs like metformin, tolbutamide, and chlorpropamide [46][88]. There are numerous herbal plants namely Allium sativum, Gymnemasylbestre, Allium cepa, Spreng, Withania somniferous, Murraya koenigii, etc., which have been reported to possess anti-diabetic constituents like terpenoids, flavonoids, phenolics, coumarins, and many other glucose reducing components being biologically active [28]. The mode of action of maximum herbal-based drugs is not clear despite their usage for decades all over the world [50]. A comprehensive table of different phytochemicals along with their mode of action is described in (Table 7) and their fabrication into potential drugs (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Exploration into the intricate world of drug discovery from plants and the potent bioactive compounds unearthed through botanical exploration and scientific innovation.
Table 7. Phytomedicinal preparations used for management of diabetes mellitus, plant parts supposed to possess high levels of pharmacologically active principles the active principles identified for their therapeutic action, and possible mechanism of action.

3.7. Dietetics

Diet and nutrition have always proved important and significant aspects for the management and control of DM. Medical nutrition therapy by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) is an essential component of diabetes management that comprises counseling and recommendations for dietary intake and nutrition goals by registered dieticians or nutrition experts to optimize metabolic control and maximize treatment outcomes. It includes designing diet plans individualized per patient needs along with regular monitoring by the registered dietician and diabetologist [42]. It has been observed that a low carbohydrate with high protein diet is a very effective dietary regime that is associated initially with a loss of weight followed by sustained blood sugar control. However, it is not so easy to maintain it for a prolonged period. A well-balanced and appropriate nutrition regime that works well is one with the inclusion of a high-fiber diet (HFD @ 20–35 g/day of both soluble and insoluble fiber followed by the intake of protein kept @ 10–20%, total fat needs to be constrained around less than 30% and 2400–3000 mg/day of sodium decrease with the inclusion of multivitamins [43].
Nowadays, vitamin D is being used on a large scale as a supplemental drug for various metabolic syndromes along with DM. However, the importance and significance of consuming an ideal and preferable dose of vitamin D is a matter of discussion worldwide [47]. Consequently, various studies have revealed a remarkable link between a deficiency of vitamin D and the emergence of T1DM [37][51][90][100]. On examination, low exposure to vitamin D during pregnancy [91] and restricting the consumption of vitamin D-fortified food [28] has resulted in a greater probability of developing T1DM. Furthermore, the supplementation of vitamin D during the early years of childhood resulted in a decline in the advancement of DM [92]. The outcome of the supplementation of vitamin D on the emergence of T1DM appears to be dependent on the different stages of life, as the supplementation of vitamin D between 7–8 months of age has resulted in two-fold lesser chances of development of T1DM [93]. Contrarily, numerous studies have reported that there is no relationship between vitamin D supplementation and reduced incidence of DM [94][95][96][98]. Additionally, the deficiency of vitamin D appears to have an effect on insulin resistance and subsequently T2DM [29][99][101]. Figure 4 describes the general nutritional strategies and dietary recommendations for optimal health management in individuals affected by diabetes mellitus.
Figure 4. A Comprehensive guide to developing and implementing an optimal dietary plan for managing diabetes mellitus.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/life14010099

References

  1. Bangalore, S.; Fakheri, R.; Toklu, B.; Messerli, F.H. Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ 2016, 352, i438.
  2. Kumar, B.; Gupta, S.K.; Srinivasan, B.; Nag, T.C.; Srivastava, S.; Saxena, R.; Jha, K.A. Hesperetin rescues retinal oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and apoptosis in diabetic rats. Microvasc. Res. 2013, 87, 65–74.
  3. Emdin, C.A.; Rahimi, K.; Neal, B.; Callender, T.; Perkovic, V.; Patel, A. Blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2015, 313, 603–615.
  4. Bordoloi, R.; Dutta, K.N. A review on herbs used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. J. Pharm. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2014, 2, 86–92.
  5. Dos Santos, J.M.; Tewari, S.; Mendes, R.H. The role of oxidative stress in the development of diabetes mellitus and its complications. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 2019, 4189813.
  6. Al Moustafa, A.-E.; Al-Antary, N.; Yasmeen, A. High-Risk Human Papillomavirus and Colorectal Carcinogenesis. In Human Papillomavirus-Research in a Global Perspective; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016.
  7. Boots, A.W.; Haenen, G.R.; Bast, A. Health effects of quercetin: From antioxidant to nutraceutical. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 585, 325–337.
  8. Carlström, M.; Larsen, F.J.; Nyström, T.; Hezel, M.; Borniquel, S.; Weitzberg, E.; Lundberg, J.O. Dietary inorganic nitrate reverses features of metabolic syndrome in endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17716–17720.
  9. Coniff, R.F.; Shapiro, J.A.; Seaton, T.B.; Bray, G.A. Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial comparing acarbose (BAY g 5421) with placebo, tolbutamide, and tol-butamide-plus-acarbose in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Med. 1995, 98, 443–451.
  10. Drummond, R.S.; Lyall, M.; McKnight, J. Statins should be routinely prescribed in all adults with diabetes. Pract. Diabetes Int. 2010, 27, 404–406.
  11. Emer, J.J.; Claire, W. Rituximab: A review of dermatological applications. J. Clin. Aesthetic Dermatol. 2009, 2, 29–37.
  12. El-Wakf, A.M.; Hassan, H.A.; Mahmoud, A.Z.; Habza, M.N. Fenugreek potent activity against nitrate-induced diabetes in young and adult male rats. Cytotechnology 2014, 67, 437–447.
  13. Goel, M.D.; Matsagar, V.A.; Gupta, A.K.; Marburg, S. An abridged review of blast wave parameters. Def. Sci. J. 2012, 62, 300–306.
  14. Ghosh, P.; Azam, S.; Karim, A.; Hassan, M.; Roy, K.; Jonkman, M. A Comparative Study of Different Machine Learning Tools in Detecting Diabetes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 467–477.
  15. Jafri, M.; Aslam, M.; Javed, K.; Singh, S. Effect of Punica granatum Linn. (flowers) on blood glucose level in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 70, 309–314.
  16. Tillin, T.; Dhutia, H.; Chambers, J.; Malik, I.; Coady, E.; Mayet, J.; Wright, A.R.; Kooner, J.; Shore, A.; Thom, S.; et al. South Asian men have different patterns of coronary artery disease when compared with European men. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008, 129, 406–413.
  17. Tuomi, T.; Groop, L.C.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Rowley, M.J.; Knowles, W.; Mackay, I.R. Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveal latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults with a non—Insulin-dependent onset of disease. Diabetes 1993, 42, 359–362.
  18. Edstorp, J.; Wei, Y.; Ahlqvist, E.; Alfredsson, L.; Grill, V.; Groop, L.; Rasouli, B.; Sørgjerd, E.P.; Thorsby, P.M.; Tuomi, T.; et al. Smoking, use of smokeless tobacco, HLA genotypes and incidence of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetologia 2022, 66, 70–81.
  19. Alieva, A.; Khalilova, D.; Saidova, S.; Salimova, A. Post-COVID diabetes rmellitus in cross-sectional study: Autoimmune disease with endothelial dysfunction? BMC 2023.
  20. Bally, K.; Ji, B.; Soni, L. COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults. Cureus 2023, 15, e33762.
  21. Lee, N.; Prabhu, P.; Swaminath, S.; Amini, S.S. Development of Islet Antigen 2 (IA2) Antibodies Post-COVID-19 Infection: A Sign of Autoimmunity or Latent Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus in Adults (LADA)? Cureus 2023, 15, e40971.
  22. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Addendum. 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022: Diabetes Care. Diabetes Care 2022, 45 (Suppl. S1), S175–S184.
  23. Corson, A. Addressing Therapeutic Inertia in Diabetes Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA, 2022.
  24. Chernausek, S.D.; Arslanian, S.; Caprio, S.; Copeland, K.C.; El Ghormli, L.; Kelsey, M.M.; Koontz, M.B.; Orsi, C.M.; Wilfley, D. Relationship Between Parental Diabetes and Presentation of Metabolic and Glycemic Function in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes: Baseline Findings from the TODAY Trial. Diabetes Care 2015, 39, 110–117.
  25. Cho, Y.; Choe, E.; Lee, Y.H.; Seo, J.W.; Choi, Y.; Yun, Y.; Wang, H.J.; Ahn, C.W.; Cha, B.S.; Lee, H.C. Risk of diabetes in patients treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Metabolism 2015, 64, 482–488.
  26. Collier, C.A.; Bruce, C.R.; Smith, A.C.; Lopaschuk, G.; Dyck, D.J. Metformin counters the insulin-induced suppression of fatty acid oxidation and stimulation of triacylglycerol storage in rodent skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 2006, 291, E182–E189.
  27. Drucker, D.J. Enhancing Incretin Action for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 2929–2940.
  28. Jacobsen, L.V.; Flint, A.; Olsen, A.K.; Ingwersen, S.H. Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2015, 55, 657–672.
  29. Kawahara, T.; Suzuki, G.; Inazu, T.; Mizuno, S.; Kasagi, F.; Okada, Y.; Tanaka, Y. Rationale and design of Diabetes Prevention with active Vitamin D (DPVD): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011183.
  30. Galea, E.; Weinstock, L.D.; Larramona-Arcas, R.; Pybus, A.F.; Giménez-Llort, L.; Escartin, C.; Wood, L.B. Multi-transcriptomic analysis points to early organelle dysfunction in human astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2022, 166, 105655.
  31. Gagliardini, E.; Conti, S.; Benigni, A.; Remuzzi, G.; Remuzzi, A. Imaging of the Porous Ultrastructure of the Glomerular Epithelial Filtration Slit. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 2081–2089.
  32. Garcia, G.; Fernandes, A.; Stein, F.; Brites, D. Protective Signature of IFNγ-Stimulated Microglia Relies on miR-124-3p Regulation from the Secretome Re-leased by Mutant APP Swedish Neuronal Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 833066.
  33. Gallwitz, B. Novel therapeutic approaches in diabetes. Nov. Diabetes 2016, 31, 43–56.
  34. Giovannini, P.; Howes, M.-J.R.; Edwards, S.E. Medicinal plants used in the traditional management of diabetes and its sequelae in Central America: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 184, 58–71.
  35. Shah, N.N.; Khan, Z.; Ahad, H.; Elderdery, A.Y.; Alomary, M.N.; Atwah, B.; Alhindi, Z.; Alsugoor, M.H.; Elkhalifa, A.M.; Nabi, S.; et al. Mucormycosis an added burden to Covid-19 Patients: An in-depth systematic review. J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 1299–1314.
  36. Geil, P.; Shane-McWhorter, L. Dietary Supplements in the Management of Diabetes: Potential Risks and Benefits. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2008, 108, S59–S65.
  37. Greer, R.M.; Portelli, S.L.; Hung, B.S.M.; Cleghorn, G.J.; McMahon, S.K.; Batch, J.A.; Conwell, L.S. Serum vitamin D levels are lower in Australian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes than in children without diabetes. Pediatr. Diabetes 2013, 14, 31–41.
  38. Ghasemi, A.; Zahediasl, S. Potential Therapeutic Effects of Nitrate/Nitrite and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 11, 63–64.
  39. Forman, E.M.; Hoffman, K.L.; Juarascio, A.S.; Butryn, M.L.; Herbert, J.D. Comparison of acceptance-based and standard cognitive-based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and obese women. Eat. Behav. 2013, 14, 64–68.
  40. van Poelje, P.D.; Dang, Q.; Erion, M.D. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes. Drug Discov. Today Ther. Strat. 2007, 4, 103–109.
  41. Patra, N.; Kar, D.; Pal, A.; Behera, A. Antibacterial, anticancer, anti-diabetic and catalytic activity of bio-conjugated metal nanoparticles. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 035001.
  42. Pastors, J.G.; Warshaw, H.; Daly, A.; Franz, M.; Kulkarni, K. The Evidence for the Effectiveness of Medical Nutrition Therapy in Diabetes Management. Diabetes Care 2002, 25, 608–613.
  43. Bantle, A.E.; Thomas, W.; Bantle, J.P. Metabolic effects of alcohol in the form of wine in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2008, 57, 241–245.
  44. Valizadeh, A.; Mikaeili, H.; Samiei, M.; Farkhani, S.M.; Zarghami, N.; Kouhi, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Davaran, S. Quantum dots: Synthesis, bioapplications, and toxicity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 1–14.
  45. Lee, Y.-S.; Shin, S.; Shigihara, T.; Hahm, E.; Liu, M.-J.; Han, J.; Yoon, J.-W.; Jun, H.-S. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Gene Therapy in Obese Diabetic Mice Results in Long-Term Cure of Diabetes by Improving Insulin Sensitivity and Reducing Hepatic Gluconeogenesis. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1671–1679.
  46. Xiang, A.H.; Wang, X.; Martinez, M.P.; Walthall, J.C.; Curry, E.S.; Page, K.; Buchanan, T.A.; Coleman, K.J.; Getahun, D. Association of Maternal Diabetes with Autism in Offspring. JAMA 2015, 313, 1425–1434.
  47. Amrein, K.; Scherkl, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Neuwersch-Sommeregger, S.; Köstenberger, M.; Berisha, A.T.; Martucci, G.; Pilz, S.; Malle, O. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: An update on the current status worldwide. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 1498–1513.
  48. Iqbal Hydrie, M.Z.; Basit, A.; Shera, A.S.; Hussain, A. Effect of intervention in subjects with high risk of diabetes mellitus in Pakistan. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 867604.
  49. Naujok, O.; Lenzen, S. Pluripotent stem cells for cell replacement therapy of diabetes. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. (1946) 2012, 137, 1062–1066.
  50. Naidu, K.C.; Pullaiah, T. Antidiabetic Plants in India and Herbal Based Antidiabetic Research; Regency: New Delhi, India, 2003.
  51. Daga, R.A.; Laway, B.A.; Shah, Z.A.; Mir, S.A.; Kotwal, S.K.; Zargar, A.H. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among newly diagnosed youth-onset diabetes mellitus in north India. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2012, 56, 423–428.
  52. Xing, R.; Li, Q.; Xia, L.; Song, J.; Xu, L.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Y.; Song, H. Au-modified three-dimensional In2O3 inverse opals: Synthesis and improved performance for acetone sensing toward diagnosis of diabetes. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 13051–13060.
  53. Liang, Y.; Hou, D.; Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Yang, P.; Shan, X.; Yan, Y.; et al. Childhood obesity affects adult metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Endocrine 2015, 50, 87–92.
  54. Abouzaripour, M.; Kashani, I.R.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Atlasy, N. Intravenous Transplantation of Very Small Embryonic Like Stem Cells in Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2015, 7, 22–31.
  55. Shi, Y.; Inoue, H.; Wu, J.C.; Yamanaka, S. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: A decade of progress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 16, 115–130.
  56. Moses, A.M.; Howanitz, J.; Miller, M. Diuretic Action of Three Sulfonylurea Drugs. Ann. Intern. Med. 1973, 78, 541–544.
  57. Nadkarni, P.; Chepurny, O.G.; Holz, G.G. Regulation of glucose homeostasis by GLP-1. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2014, 121, 23–65.
  58. Thakkar, U.G.; Trivedi, H.L.; Vanikar, A.V.; Dave, S.D. Insulin-secreting adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells with bone marrow–derived hematopoietic stem cells from autologous and allogenic sources for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cytotherapy 2015, 17, 940–947.
  59. Nam, S.; Song, Y. Role of self-efficacy in the relationship between patient-provider relationships and psychological insulin resistance among patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Contemp. Diabetes Res. 2014, 1, 1.
  60. Snarski, E.; Milczarczyk, A.; Hałaburda, K.; Torosian, T.; Paluszewska, M.; Urbanowska, E.; Król, M.; Boguradzki, P.; Jedynasty, K.; Franek, E.; et al. Immunoablation and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: Long-term observations. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015, 51, 398–402.
  61. Jeon, C.Y.; Haan, M.N.; Cheng, C.; Clayton, E.R.; Mayeda, E.R.; Miller, J.W.; Aiello, A.E. Helicobacter pylori Infection Is Associated with an Increased Rate of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 520–525.
  62. Toklu, H.Z. Pharmacovigilance of Herbal Medicine: Herbavigilance. Adv. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2016, 5, 1000208.
  63. Talreja, S.; Kaur, C.D. Fighting diabetes with herbal technological developments. World J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 3, 2842–2867.
  64. Waseem, R.; Muhee, A.; Malik, H.U.; Akhoon, Z.A.; Munir, K.; Nabi, S.U.; Taifa, S. Isolation and Identification of Major Mastitis Causing Bacteria from Clinical Cases of Bovine Mastitis in Kashmir Valley. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2020, 54, 1428–1432.
  65. Rosalie, I.O.; Ekype, E. Antidiabetic potentials of common herbal plants and plant products: A glance. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2016, 4, 90–97.
  66. Gu, Z.; Dang, T.T.; Ma, M.; Tang, B.C.; Cheng, H.; Jiang, S.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Anderson, D.G. Glucose-Responsive Microgels Integrated with Enzyme Nanocapsules for Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6758–6766.
  67. Yao, B.; Fang, H.; Xu, W.; Yan, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; Mo, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y. Dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: A dose–response analysis of prospective studies. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 29, 79–88.
  68. DiSanto, R.M.; Subramanian, V.; Gu, Z. Recent advances in nanotechnology for diabetes treatment. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 7, 548–564.
  69. Arumugam, G.; Manjula, P.; Paari, N. A review: Anti diabetic medicinal plants used for diabetes mellitus. J. Acute Dis. 2013, 2, 196–200.
  70. Bedekar, A.; Shah, K.; Koffas, M. Natural products for type II diabetes treatment. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 71, 21–73.
  71. Jarald, E.; Joshi, S.B.; Jain, D. Diabetes and herbal medicines. Iran. J. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 7, 97–106.
  72. Patel, D.; Kumar, R.; Laloo, D.; Hemalatha, S. Natural medicines from plant source used for therapy of diabetes mellitus: An overview of its pharmacological aspects. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2012, 2, 239–250.
  73. Pirags, V.; Lebovitz, H.; Fouqueray, P. Imeglimin, a novel glimin oral antidiabetic, exhibits a good efficacy and safety profile in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2012, 14, 852–858.
  74. Rahimi, R.; Nikfar, S.; Larijani, B.; Abdollahi, M. A review on the role of antioxidants in the management of diabetes and its complications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2005, 59, 365–373.
  75. Neumiller, J.J.; Wood, L.; Campbell, R.K. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2010, 30, 463–484.
  76. Zmistowski, B.; Restrepo, C.; Hess, J.; Adibi, D.; Cangoz, S.; Parvizi, J. Unplanned readmission after total joint arthroplasty: Rates, reasons, and risk factors. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2013, 95, 1869–1876.
  77. Yatoo, M.I.; Saxena, A.; Jhambh, R.; Nabi, S.; Melepad, D.P.; Kumar, P.; Dimri, U.; Sharma, M.C. Status of trace mineral deficiency in sheep and goat in Kashmir Valley. Res. J. Vet. Pract. 2013, 1, 43–45.
  78. Zinman, B.; Wanner, C.; Lachin, J.M.; Fitchett, D.; Bluhmki, E.; Hantel, S.; Mattheus, M.; Devins, T.; Johansen, O.E.; Woerle, H.J. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2117–2128.
  79. Tyagi, A.C.; Sen, U.; Mishra, P.K. Synergy of microRNA and stem cell: A novel therapeutic approach for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2011, 7, 367–376.
  80. Radican, L.; Fu, A.Z.; Zhang, Q.; Pentakota, S.R.; Seck, T. Underutilisation of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with an antihyperglycaemic regimen. In Diabetologia; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  81. Chen, L.-K.; Chen, Y.-M.; Lin, M.-H.; Peng, L.-N.; Hwang, S.-J. Care of elderly patients with diabetes mellitus: A focus on frailty. Ageing Res. Rev. 2010, 9, S18–S22.
  82. Gupta, N.; Gupta, N.D.; Garg, S.; Goyal, L.; Gupta, A.; Khan, S.; Moin, S. The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus and smoking on periodontal parameters and salivary matrix metallopro-teinase-8 levels. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 58, 1–6.
  83. Ryan, G.J.; Jobe, L.J.; Martin, R. Pramlintide in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Ther. 2005, 27, 1500–1512.
  84. Stonehouse, A.H.; Darsow, T.; Maggs, D.G. Incretin-based therapies. J. Diabetes 2012, 4, 55–67.
  85. Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Zhang, W. Risk Factors Contributing to Type 2 Diabetes and Recent Advances in the Treatment and Prevention. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 11, 1185–1200.
  86. Marek-Trzonkowska, N.; Myśliwiec, M.; Dobyszuk, A.; Grabowska, M.; Derkowska, I.; Juścińska, J.; Owczuk, R.; Szadkowska, A.; Witkowski, P.; Młynarski, W.; et al. Therapy of type 1 diabetes with CD4+CD25highCD127-regulatory T cells prolongs survival of pancreatic islets—Results of one year follow-up. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 153, 23–30.
  87. Tang, Q.; Henriksen, K.J.; Boden, E.K.; Tooley, A.J.; Ye, J.; Subudhi, S.K.; Zheng, X.X.; Strom, T.B.; Bluestone, J.A. Cutting Edge: CD28 Controls Peripheral Homeostasis of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3348–3352.
  88. Nabi, S.; Dey, S.; Shah, O.; Hussain, T.; Amin, U.; Vala, J.; Jan, A.; Ramdas, A.; Muhee, A.; Hussain, A.; et al. Incidence of renal disorders in canines and its relation with age breed and sex. Pharma Innov. J. 2018, 7, 87–89.
  89. Rahimi, G.; Jafari, N.; Khodabakhsh, M.; Shirzad, Z.; Dogaheh, H.P. Upregulation of microRNA Processing Enzymes Drosha and Dicer in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2014, 31, 156–159.
  90. Rasoul, M.A.; Al-Mahdi, M.; Al-Kandari, H.; Dhaunsi, G.S.; Haider, M.Z. Low serum vitamin-D status is associated with high prevalence and early onset of type-1 diabetes mellitus in Kuwaiti children. BMC Pediatr. 2016, 16, 1–7.
  91. Sørensen, I.M.; Joner, G.; Jenum, P.A.; Eskild, A.; Torjesen, P.A.; Stene, L.C. Maternal Serum Levels of 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D During Pregnancy and Risk of Type 1 Diabetes in the Offspring. Diabetes 2011, 61, 175–178.
  92. Dong, J.-Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.J.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Han, S.-F.; Qin, L.-Q. Vitamin D Intake and Risk of Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrients 2013, 5, 3551–3562.
  93. Stene, L.C.; Magnus, P.; Lie, R.T.; Søvik, O.; Joner, G. No Association between Preeclampsia or Cesarean Section and Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes among Children: A Large, Population-Based Cohort Study. Pediatr. Res. 2003, 54, 487–490.
  94. Raab, J.; Giannopoulou, E.Z.; Schneider, S.; Warncke, K.; Krasmann, M.; Winkler, C.; Ziegler, A.-G. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pre-type 1 diabetes and its association with disease progression. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 902–908.
  95. Mäkinen, M.; Mykkänen, J.; Koskinen, M.; Simell, V.; Veijola, R.; Hyöty, H.; Ilonen, J.; Knip, M.; Simell, O.; Toppari, J. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations in Children Progressing to Autoimmunity and Clinical Type 1 Diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 723–729.
  96. Simpson, M.; Brady, H.; Yin, X.; Seifert, J.; Barriga, K.; Hoffman, M.; Bugawan, T.; Barón, A.E.; Sokol, R.J.; Eisenbarth, G.; et al. No association of vitamin D intake or 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in childhood with risk of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). Diabetologia 2011, 54, 2779–2788.
  97. Dikshit, P.; Shukla, K.; Tyagi, M.K.; Garg, P.; Gambhir, J.K.; Shukla, R. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic effects of the stem of Musa sapientum Linn. in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Diabetes 2012, 4, 378–385.
  98. Rak, K.; Bronkowska, M. Immunomodulatory Effect of Vitamin D and Its Potential Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus—A Narrative Review. Molecules 2018, 24, 53.
  99. Ahmed, A.S. Association between Patient Interpretation of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Foot Self-Care Behaviors. Int. J. Nurs. Didact. 2018, 8, 43–59.
  100. Federico, G.; Genoni, A.; Puggioni, A.; Saba, A.; Gallo, D.; Randazzo, E.; Salvatoni, A.; Toniolo, A. Vitamin D status, enterovirus infection, and type 1 diabetes in Italian children/adolescents. Pediatr. Diabetes 2018, 19, 923–929.
  101. Grant, S.F. The TCF7L2 Locus: A Genetic Window into the Pathogenesis of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 1624–1629.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service