Advances and Concerns Related to Electric Vehicles: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Mihnea-Antoniu Covaci
,
Ramona Voichița Gălătuș
,
Dorin Marius Petreuș
,
Lorant Andras Szolga
Human operators’ presence for periodic maintenance is required in all transportation infrastructures; while providing a sustainable solution with Electric Vehicles (EVs) network, each vehicle needs servicing to maintain its robustness. Parts, such as reactive components from converter units, namely electrolytic capacitors, require periodic replacement. Other components, such as microcontroller PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards), are prone to EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory) decay and data loss. As fossil fuel is mainly used in generating energy and biosphere degradation remains a concern due to terrain expansion, wireless energy transfer could be an immediate solution for substituting the current transportation infrastructure for a robust and renewable solution. When migrating an entire transportation infrastructure to wireless energy transmission, periodic maintenance of energy transmitters, for example, orbital space stations, would be necessary. This requires the operator’s presence, and health becomes important in maintaining the robustness of this hypothetical sustainable transportation infrastructure. Multiple health concerns are related to the effect of conversion units, typically used in electric vehicles and other hybrid and modern combustion engine means of transportation. These units cover both wire-based and wireless energy transmission. As covered in further sections, several already implemented features of vehicles could negatively impact the operator’s health because such features are mainly based on wireless energy transfer, while other functionalities cause EMI (Electromagnetic Interference) perturbation.
  • energy management systems
  • electric vehicles
  • hybrid powertrain

1. Modern Features of Electric Vehicles

The currently in-service ICE vehicles could not be adapted to a sustainable transportation solution without major recalls or significant environmental damage. Although the generic purpose of electric vehicles provides more sustainability, this infrastructure insufficiently compensates for the greenhouse gas emissions due to the non-sustainable electricity generation for charging stations.

Besides the partially renewable feature of electric vehicles, producers have implemented various additions to facilitate several aspects of operation and communication, as shown below in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Innovations for electric vehicles.
The wireless power transfer concept only closes the charging circuit through magnetic coupling. As its name suggests, autonomous driving involves the possibility of driving such vehicles partially independently from the driver’s commands by taking measurements of the surrounding environment. Connected mobility connects automobiles to various traffic objects, such as other vehicles, stations, or traffic signals. The shared economy concept represents the possibility of sharing operating resource costs, while the energy internet unifies the energy infrastructures (electric, transportation, or thermal) into one platform [1].
Although these systems provide utility to vehicles in production, many features are based on WiFi (Wireless Fidelity) technology. Such wireless transmission systems have been researched to have adverse biological effects. As will be discussed, even short-intensity radiation could negatively impact health during prolonged exposure.

2. Wireless Charging Systems

Wireless charging energy transfer has become a popular alternative to conventional inlet-plug charging systems and underwent intense studies about integration into the infrastructure [2]. Because wireless charging is more environmentally and user-friendly, switching to WPT (Wireless Power Transfer) may be a better option [3]. A block diagram for such energy conversion systems is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. WPT charger block diagram.
The WPT system provides several advantages in contrast to wire charging. This charging topology does not require a physical connection between the vehicle and the station, providing a safer and, in some cases, more efficient charging circuit [4]. Moreover, certain standards offered compatibility between different chargers [5], allowing the use of charging stations to a wider extent for electric vehicles.
As for the vehicle-to-grid concept, different adaptation methods could be used to integrate a WPT system into such a circuit [6]. This would allow a bidirectional energy transfer, further extending the capabilities of such charging topologies by charging or providing energy at certain times. However, when applied to vehicles in traffic, a wireless charging system based on magnetic coupling requires an accurate alignment between the vehicle and road inductors [7]. As an alternative to this limitation, microwaves could provide an alternative transfer of energy, eliminating the need for WPT methods and eliminating the need for charging stations [8]. However, the harm risk of using microwaves for energy transfer is greater, meaning that irradiation can occur and have negative biological consequences.

3. Health Impact Concerns for Communication Networks

Modern electronic equipment poses the danger of long-term exposure to NIR (Non-Ionizing Radiation) for all previously covered renewable and non-renewable vehicle topologies. Multiple sources of such radiation can be identified, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Sources of NIR and their respective frequency bands [9].
Source Frequency Band (MHz) 1
Digital audio broadcasting 200
Terrestrial trunked radio 390
GSM mobile phones 935
DCS mobile phones 1750
Tx 3G mobile phones 1950
Wireless networks and microwave ovens 2450
Bluetooth 2500
4G mobile phones 3700
5G mobile phones 52,000
1 These values are an approximation for all entries.
The data presented above show the tendency to increase the frequency band as the data transfer rate increases. Television, microwave ovens, mobile phones, and most wireless communication or energy transfer circuits are sources of non-ionizing radiation. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified this type of radiation as a possible carcinogen, meaning that even with negligible power levels, prolonged exposure to NIR cannot be neglected [10][11].
Wireless data communication occurs in most features of modern internal combustion engines or electric vehicles. The devices communicating data are often based on high-speed communication protocols, such as GPS (Global Positioning System), built-in WiFi, and radio frequency identification devices.
Studies have found that non-ionizing radiation harms human tissue, although more research is needed on electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones. Also, long-term evaluation of WiFi exposure is challenging, and results might be mixed with other electromagnetic radiation types. Below a certain threshold, some researchers consider NIR to be not harmful [12][13].
However, studies have shown harmful effects after long-term communication network use from mobile phones, including intracranial tumors [14]. Epidemiological reports have evaluated radiation exposures still below the ARPANSA (Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency) standards originally mentioned as safe but found a possible linkage between salivary gland tumors and wireless communication [15][16]. Another possible linkage of pre-natal autism was reported as a consequence of long-term WiFi effects [17]. Limiting the electromagnetic perturbing exposure functions to maintain a safe environment for wireless communication and high-power conversion circuits, for which standards were set for switching frequencies between 3 kHz and 100 kHz [18].

4. Biological Effects of Wireless Energy Conversion Systems

During the studies mentioned in [19], it has been determined that cerebral spinal fluid has the highest electrical conductivity of all human tissues and fluids tested. The reference DC converter was operated at 85 kHz to achieve a wireless power transfer, and the study was conducted for a male human model. The results show the potential hazard related to the absorption of electromagnetic interference by multiple human body parts.
As for the improvement of switching parts in DC converter units, an experimental study points to the possible harmful effects of long-term exposure to low-intensity NIR. By changing the transistor types, electromagnetic compatibility can worsen [20]. As demonstrated by Fourier series decomposing, many high-frequency harmonics will be present in the proximity of DC converters. Even so, guidelines were applied to minimize the harmful impact on human health [21].
Overall, the higher the frequency of radiation, the more hazardous the long-term effect of wireless communication and energy transfer systems. An increase in data transfer rate involves an increase in switching frequency, which extends closer to the ionizing radiations domain; such radiations are proven to dislocate electrons and provide a greater health risk.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/app132413026

References

  1. Hossain, M.S.; Kumar, L.; Assad, M.E.H.; Alayi, R. Advancements and Future Prospects of Electric Vehicle Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Complexity 2022, 2022, 3304796.
  2. Mahesh, A.; Chokkalingam, B.; Mihet-Popa, L. Inductive Wireless Power Transfer Charging for Electric Vehicles–A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 137667–137713.
  3. Amjad, M.; Farooq-I-Azam, M.; Ni, Q.; Dong, M.; Ansari, E.A. Wireless charging systems for electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112730.
  4. Vishnuram, P.P.S.K.V.; Nastasi, B. Wireless Chargers for Electric Vehicle: A Systemic Review on Converter Topologies, Environmental Assessment, and Review Policy. Energies 2023, 16, 1731.
  5. Song, K.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, J.; Sun, C.; Yang, G.; Yang, F.; Lan, H. A Review on Interoperability of Wireless Charging Systems for Electric Vehicles. Energies 2023, 16, 1653.
  6. Triviño-Cabrera, A.; Aguado, J.A. Wireless Charging for Electric Vehicles in the Smart Cities: Technology Review and Impact. In Communication Networks and Services; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2018.
  7. Cirimele, V.; Smiai, O.; Guglielmi, P.; Bellotti, F.; Berta, R.; De Gloria, A. Maximizing Power Transfer for Dynamic Wireless Charging Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, Pisa, Italy, 26–27 September 2018; pp. 59–65.
  8. Feng, H.; Tavakoli, R.; Onar, O.C.; Pantic, Z. Advances in High-Power Wireless Charging Systems: Overview and Design Con-siderations. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2020, 6, 886–919.
  9. Kottou, S.; Nikolopoulos, D.; Petraki, E.; Louizi, A.; Argyriou, X.; Sevvos, T.; Yannakopoulos, P.H. Human Beings and Radiation—A Review. E J. Sci. Technol. 2014, 3, 51–60.
  10. Samarth, R.; Kumar, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Manda, K. The Effects of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation on Health, Recent Trends and Advances in Environmental Health; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 179–203.
  11. Šinik, V.; Despotović, Ž.; Radovanović, L. Influence of Non-Ionizing Radiation on the Environment, Reporting for Sustainability. 2013, pp. 465–469. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236864027_INFLUENCE_OF_NON-IONIZING_RADIATION_ON_THE_ENVIRONMENT#fullTextFileContent (accessed on 8 October 2023).
  12. Kontomaris, S.-V.; Malamou, A. A discussion about ionising and non-ionising radiation and the critical issue of mobile phones. Phys. Educ. 2018, 53, 015007.
  13. Dongus, S.; Jalilian, H.; Schürmann, D.; Röösli, M. Health effects of WiFi radiation: A review based on systematic quality evaluation. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 52, 3547–3566.
  14. Bandara, P.; Weller, S.; Leach, V. Health Risks of Wireless Technologies. Radiat. Prot. Australas. 2018, 35, 22–26.
  15. Bortkiewicz, A.; Gadzicka, E.; Szymczak, W. Mobile phone use and risk for intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors—A meta-analysis. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2017, 30, 27–43, Erratum in Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2017, 30, 685.
  16. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. Radiation Protection Series 3—Radiation Protection Standard for Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields—3 kHz to 300 GHz. Melbourne, Australia, 2016. Available online: https://www.arpansa.gov.au/regulation-and-licensing/regulatory-publications/radiation-protection-series/codes-and-standards/rps3 (accessed on 8 October 2023).
  17. Pall, M.L. Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 405–416.
  18. Dergham, I.; Rocha, J.-C.M.; Imad, R.; Alayli, Y. Effect of wireless charging of mobility scooters on human health and temperature increase of their chassis. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Rome, Italy, 23–25 September 2020; pp. 1–5.
  19. Park, S. Investigating human exposure to a practical wireless power transfer system using and the effect about key parameters of dosimetry. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236929.
  20. Moreno-Torres, P.; Lafoz, M.; Blanco, M.; Arribas, J.R. Passenger Exposure to Magnetic Fields in Electric Vehicles. In Modeling and Simulation for Electric Vehicle Applications; InTech: London, UK, 2016.
  21. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Principles for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 2020, 118, 477–482.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback