Mesoporous Materials for Metal-Laden Wastewater Treatment: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Dmitrii Grozdov
,
Inga Zinicovscaia

Rapid technological, industrial and agricultural development has resulted in the release of large volumes of pollutants, including metal ions, into the environment. Heavy metals have become of great concern due to their toxicity, persistence, and adverse effects caused to the environment and population. In this regard, municipal and industrial effluents should be thoroughly treated before being discharged into natural water or used for irrigation. The physical, chemical, and biological techniques applied for wastewater treatment adsorption have a special place in enabling effective pollutant removal.

  • mesoporous materials
  • adsorption
  • metals
  • wastewater
  • bioremediation

1. Introduction

Water contamination is one of the most significant issues the globe has faced in recent years. According to the United Nations, approximately 80% of all industrial and urban wastewater is discharged into the environment, particularly in developing countries [1], often without any treatment. Among the wide variety of pollutants entering the environment, heavy metals are one of the most dangerous due to their toxicity, persistence, and biomagnification [2]. Some elements, belonging to the heavy metals Co, Mo, Se, Cu, Cr, Fe, and Mn, perform important biochemical and physiological functions in living organisms, and their deficiency can result in numerous disorders or syndromes. At the same time, it is important to know that for elements such as, for example, Cr, Se, and Cu, there is a very narrow range of concentrations between beneficial and toxic effects [3].
The intensification of human activities and the active application of metals in agriculture, the plating and electroplating industry, the chemical industry, mechanical engineering, the textile industry, metal smelting, the petrochemical industry, etc. [2][3], has considerably increased the release of metals such as Al, Pb, Sb, Hg, As, and Cd, which have no biological functions and are toxic even at 1–100 µM levels, into natural water bodies [3][4]. Gastrointestinal and renal failure, neurological disorders, skin lesions, vascular damage, immune system problems, birth deformities, and cancer are a few outcomes brought on by the harmful effects of heavy metals. Metal ions also provoke the generation of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress as well as enzyme inactivation [5][6][7][8].
Great efforts are required to reduce the negative impact of toxic elements on natural ecosystems. One of the important tools for addressing the problem is the careful treatment of wastewater before its discharge into the environment or further use. Currently, a wide variety of techniques, including biological treatment, coagulation, ultrafiltration, coagulation, flocculation, membrane separation procedures, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, enhanced oxidation, reverse osmosis, membrane filtration, ion exchange, electrochemical treatment, irradiation, extraction, and adsorption are applied to reduce concentrations of heavy metals in wastewater to maximum admissible levels [1][9][10]. However, the numerous drawbacks associated with these techniques, such as high cost, energy consumption, the frequent need for reagents, the unpredictable removal of heavy metal ions, and the production of hazardous sludge, make them unpopular [9][11]. For instance, precipitation produces a large amount of sludge, while membrane filtration, ion exchange, electro-deposition, and filtration are expensive techniques [12].
Adsorption has demonstrated great potential among the technologies available for metal removal due to its economic feasibility, ease of handling, the accessibility of sorbents, affordability, large surface area, high adsorption capacity, and environmental sustainability, as well as its potential selectivity for the target metal and low sludge generation. Heavy metal ions can be captured and removed from wastewater using commercial and natural adsorbents, which are often characterized by high removal capacity [13][14][15][16][17]. Nowadays, metal–organic frameworks [18][19], anionic clays [20][21], nanomaterials [22][23], activated carbon [24][25], hydroxyapatites [26][27], and natural minerals [28][29] are applied for wastewater treatment. It is worth mentioning that some drawbacks of these materials have already been identified, including their frequently low surface area and water stability as well as low adsorption capacity. Therefore, the design of new porous adsorbent materials with enhanced adsorption capabilities and great structural robustness is still necessary for the development of efficient remediation systems [4].
Functional mesoporous materials are now seen as intriguing compounds for a variety of applications, including drug delivery, biomedicine, catalysis, and the adsorption of pollutants of different origins. These materials are characterized by large pore volumes, exceptionally large specific surface area, homogeneous pore size distributions, and tunable pore sizes, which contribute to their technological advantages [30][31]. Additionally, adding appropriate functional groups to the surface can increase their affinity for the target metal ions [32].

2. Application of Mesoporous Materials for Metal Removal from Wastewater

The ability of mesoporous bifunctional magnetic NZVI-SH-HMS to remove Cd and Pb from solutions was investigated. Low adsorption at pH 3.0 was replaced by a drastic increase with the increase in pH from 3.0 to 4.0, indicating that the removal process was pH-dependent. For both elements, adsorption equilibrium was reached in a short time: 30 min for Pb and 50 min for Cd, and the kinetics of the process were presented by a pseudo-second-order model. Adsorption was better described by the Langmuir model with a maximum adsorption capacity of NZVI-SH-HMS 487.8 mg/g for Pb and 330.0 mg/g for Cd. Additionally, NZVI-SH-HMS demonstrated good adsorption capacity and sorption recyclability in the case of real wastewater of different origins [33]. Zhai [34] studied the effect of experimental conditions on Cu removal by the SBA-15 molecular sieve. The maximum adsorption capacity of 11.39 mg/g was achieved under optimized adsorption conditions (pH 3.5, adsorbent dosage 0.0050 g, time 40 min). It was shown that the kinetics of the process were described using the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, while equilibrium applied the Freundlich model. From a thermodynamic point of view, the process was spontaneous and exothermic. At the same time, Knight et al. [35], studying the nano-scale confinement effects on the adsorption of Cu on mesoporous silica with pore sizes of 8, 6, and 4 nm showed low metal adsorption onto the surface of SBA-15, with the maximum measured surface loading of 0.020 ± 0.001, 0.019 ± 0.002, and 0.039 ± 0.002 μmol/m2 for SBA-15-8, SBA-15-6, and SBA-15-4, respectively. The effect of contact time and pH on Zn adsorption onto SBA-16 and SBA-15 modified with APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxy-silane) and then with EDTA was investigated by [36]. For both adsorbents, equilibrium was reached within the first 30 min and maximum removal was obtained at pH 6.0. Equilibrium data were better described by the Freundlich isotherm model and the maximum adsorption capacity amounted to 184.1 mg/g for SBA-16 and 108 mg/g for SBA-15.
The removal of As(III) and As(V) using amidoxime resin embedded into mesoporous silica was highly affected by the solution pH. The maximum removal of As(V) was attained at pH 3.0 and of As(III) at pH 8.0. The time required for equilibrium attainment was 3–4 h. The maximum adsorption calculated from Langmuir models constituted 3.8 mmol/g for As(III) and 3.1 mmol/g for As(V) [37]. EDTA-modified magnetic mesoporous microspheres (Fe3O4@nSiO2@mSiO2/EDTA) showed high adsorption capacity for Cr(III), and the maximum adsorption of 30.59 mg/g was obtained at pH 3.0 and 25 °C. The equilibrium data fitted well to the Freundlich isotherm model. Studying the effect of cations (Na+, K+ and Ca2+) and complex agents (EDTA, citric acid and formic acid), the authors showed that the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@nSiO2@mSiO2/EDTA for Cr(III) did not change significantly [38]. The Fe3O4@SiO2@m-SiO2 microspheres showed a high sorption capacity of 834.18 mg/g for Cd at pH 6.0 after 20 min of contact. The adsorbent maintained high adsorption capacity during six sorption–desorption cycles [39]. Antimony adsorption on nano-Fe3O4-modified high-iron red mud (HRM@nFe3O4) was not dependent on the pH of the solution. The maximum adsorption capacity of Sb(III) on HRM@nFe3O4 computed from the Langmuir model was 98.03 mg/g, while both the pseudo-first-order and the pseudo-second-order models were suitable for the explanation of the experimental data. Studying the effect of co-existing ions, it was shown that Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42−, and Cl− did not affect Sb(III) adsorption; however, it was inhibited by the presence of SiO32− and PO43− [40]. A set of SBA-15 adsorbents functionalized with ethylenediaminetriacetic acid, primary amine, and quaternary ammonium were applied for Cr(III, VI), Mn(II, VII), Pb, Cd, and Cu adsorption. The adsorbent functionalized by ethylenediaminetriacetic acid showed the highest adsorption capacity for the studied metal ions, which amounted to 195.6 mg/g for Pb, 111.2 mg/g for Cd, 57.7 mg/g for Cr(III), 58.7 mg/g for Cu, and 49.4 mg/g for Mn(II). The presence of organic matter and major water cations did not affect the efficiency of the studied metal ions’ removal. The maximum adsorption for all studied cations was attained at pH 4.0–6.0, while elements in anionic form were more efficiently removed in the pH range from 5.0 to 8.0. The efficiency of metals’ removal from artesian, urban river, and lake water was at the level of 96% for all metal ions [41].
A new Zn-based MOF (IUST-2), showed maximum Pb and Hg adsorption at pH values of 5.0 and 4.0, respectively. The theoretical maximum adsorption of Pb and Hg ions was computed to be 1430 and 900 mg/g, respectively [42]. The maximum adsorption capacity of the Cu–MOF toward Cd at 219.05 mg/g was attained at pH 4.0, a contact time of 60 min, and an adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g [43]. Nabipour et al. [44] discussed in detail the use of MOFs for Cd removal from wastewater, while Shellaiah and Sun [45] described their application for mercury removal. The guidance for the synthesis of novel MOF adsorbents and their application for U adsorption was provided by [46].
More examples of mesoporous materials’ applications for metal removal are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Metal adsorption on mesoporous adsorbents.
Sorbent Metal pH q, mg/g Isotherm Model Surface Area, m2/g Reference
Mesoporous iron oxide As(III) 5–9 136.89 Freundlich 269 [47]
As(V) 5–9 31.82 Langmuir
Iron oxide nanoparticles immobilized on cellulose nanofibril aerogels As(III) 7 48 Langmuir 165 [48]
As(V) 7 91
ZIF-67/ZIF-8 As(V) 6.5 71.4 Langmuir 950 [49]
Cr(VI) 6.5 69.4
MOF-5 Cr(VI) 2.0 78.12 Langmuir 500.8 [50]
Mesoporous α-FeOOH nanoparticles Cr(VI) 3 16.58 Langmuir 46 [51]
(3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane functionalized mesoporous silica Cr(VI) 3 89.4 Temkin 857.88 [52]
Amino-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles Cr(VI) 2.0 42.2 Langmuir 517.4 [17]
Mesoporous carbon microspheres Cr(VI) 3.0 156.3 Langmuir 1061 [53]
Polypyrrole/hollow mesoporous silica particle Cr(VI)   322 Langmuir 325 [54]
Multi-modified SBA-15 (Mn-SBA-15-NH2) Cu 5.0 2.01 mmol/g Langmuir 310 [55]
SBA-15 Silica Cu 5.0 52.71 Langmuir 802.493 [56]
ETS-10 titanosilicate Cu 6.0 172.53 Langmuir 31.473 [56]
Mesoporous
aluminosilicates		 Cu 4.0 16 Langmuir 243 [57]
Mesoporous activated carbon Cu 6.0 12 Langmuir 843.3 [58]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified by
dibenzoylmethane		 Cu 6 31.76 Langmuir - [59]
Mesoporous carbon Co 4.0–6.0 5.85 Langmuir 439–924 [60]
NZVI-SH-HMS Cd 4.5 330.0 Langmuir 312.84 [33]
Mesoporous material (DMOS) Cd 6.0 107 Langmuir 431 [61]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified by
dibenzoylmethane		 Cd 6.0 35.37 Langmuir - [59]
PEI/MCM-41 * Cd 6.0 156.0 Langmuir/Freundlich 440 [62]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified by
dibenzoylmethane		 Hg 6.0 25.17 Langmuir - [59]
DA-KIT–6 Hg 10 50 Langmuir 185 [63]
SBA-15 Silica In 6.0 2036 Langmuir 802.493 [64]
Mesoporous activated carbon Pb 6.0 12.7 Langmuir 843.3 [58]
Mesoporous composite material Pb 6.0 196.35 Langmuir 527 [65]
NZVI-SH-HMS Pb 5.5 487.8 Langmuir 312.84 [33]
Mesoporous activated carbon Zn 5.2 100.76 Langmuir 688.2 [66]
PEI/MCM-41 * Ni 6.0 139.7 Langmuir/Freundlich 440 [62]
* Nano-spherical amine-rich polyethylenimine (PEI) grafted on mesoporous silica (MCM-41).

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ma16175864

References

  1. Bayuo, J.; Rwiza, M.J.; Sillanpää, M.; Mtei, K.M. Removal of Heavy Metals from Binary and Multicomponent Adsorption Systems Using Various Adsorbents–a Systematic Review. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 13052–13093.
  2. Kapoor, D.; Singh, M.P. Heavy Metal Contamination in Water and Its Possible Sources. Heavy Met. Environ. Impact Assess. Remediat. 2021, 179–189.
  3. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metals Toxicity and the Environment. EXS 2012, 101, 133.
  4. Flores, D.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Gomes, C.R.; Balula, S.S.; Granadeiro, C.M. Tailoring of Mesoporous Silica-Based Materials for Enhanced Water Pollutants Removal. Molecules 2023, 28, 4038.
  5. Jaishankar, M.; Tseten, T.; Anbalagan, N.; Mathew, B.B.; Beeregowda, K.N. Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 60.
  6. Rani, L.; Basnet, B.; Kumar, A. Mercury Toxicity. Encycl. Environ. Health 2022, 325–332.
  7. Royer, A.; Sharman, T. Copper Toxicity; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023.
  8. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972.
  9. Khan, A.A.; Mondal, M. Low-Cost Adsorbents, Removal Techniques, and Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency. New Trends Remov. Heavy Met. Ind. Wastewater 2021, 83–103.
  10. Yadav, M.; Singh, G.; Jadeja, R.N. Physical and Chemical Methods for Heavy Metal Removal. In Pollutants and Water Management: Resources, Strategies and Scarcity; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 377–397.
  11. Vo, T.S.; Hossain, M.M.; Jeong, H.M.; Kim, K. Heavy Metal Removal Applications Using Adsorptive Membranes. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 36.
  12. Sen, T.K.; Gomez, D. Adsorption of Zinc (Zn2+) from Aqueous Solution on Natural Bentonite. Desalination 2011, 267, 286–294.
  13. Bashir, M.; Tyagi, S.; Annachhatre, A.P. Adsorption of Copper from Aqueous Solution onto Agricultural Adsorbents: Kinetics and Isotherm Studies. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 28, 1833–1840.
  14. Nicomel, N.R.; Otero-Gonzalez, L.; Folens, K.; Mees, B.; Hennebel, T.; Du Laing, G. Selective and Enhanced Nickel Adsorption from Sulfate- and Calcium-Rich Solutions Using Chitosan. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 276, 119283.
  15. Türkmen, D.; Bakhshpour, M.; Akgönüllü, S.; Aşır, S.; Denizli, A. Heavy Metal Ions Removal From Wastewater Using Cryogels: A Review. Front. Sustain. 2022, 3, 765592.
  16. Rani, L.; Kaushal, J.; Srivastav, A.L.; Mahajan, P. A Critical Review on Recent Developments in MOF Adsorbents for the Elimination of Toxic Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 44771–44796.
  17. Jang, E.H.; Pack, S.P.; Kim, I.; Chung, S. A Systematic Study of Hexavalent Chromium Adsorption and Removal from Aqueous Environments Using Chemically Functionalized Amorphous and Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5558.
  18. Wang, C.-Y.; Ma, L.; Wang, C.-C.; Wang, P.; Gutierrez, L.; Zheng, W. Light-Response Adsorption and Desorption Behaviors of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Environ. Funct. Mater. 2022, 1, 49–66.
  19. Liu, H.; Fu, T.; Mao, Y. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Materials for Adsorption and Detection of Uranium(VI) from Aqueous Solution. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 14430–14456.
  20. Huang, X.; Yang, G. Charge Reversal and Anion Effects during Adsorption of Metal Ions at Clay Surfaces: Mechanistic Aspects and Influence Factors. Chem. Phys. 2020, 529, 110575.
  21. Rajamathi, M.; Thomas, G.S.; Kamath, P.V. The Many Ways of Making Anionic Clays. J. Chem. Sci. 2001, 113, 671–680.
  22. Aigbe, U.O.; Osibote, O.A. Carbon Derived Nanomaterials for the Sorption of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution: A Review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100578.
  23. Stor, M.; Czelej, K.; Krasiński, A.; Gradoń, L. Exceptional Sorption of Heavy Metals from Natural Water by Halloysite Particles: A New Prospect of Highly Efficient Water Remediation. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1162.
  24. Meez, E.; Tolkou, A.K.; Giannakoudakis, D.A.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Activated Carbons for Arsenic Removal from Natural Waters and Wastewaters: A Review. Water 2021, 13, 2982.
  25. Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Zhou, S.; Gao, X. Adsorption Mechanism of Cr(VI) on Woody-Activated Carbons. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13267.
  26. Zinicovscaia, I.; Yushin, N.; Abdusamadzoda, D.; Grozdov, D.; Humelnicu, I.; Ignat, M.; Humelnicu, D. Removal of Vanadium Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Different Type of Hydroxyapatites: Adsorption Isotherm, Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2021, 20, 871–881.
  27. Zinicovscaia, I.; Yushin, N.; Humelnicu, D.; Ignat, M.; Humelnicu, I.; Grozdov, D.; Vershinina, T. Removal of Indium Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Hydroxyapatite and Its Two Modifications. Separations 2023, 10, 401.
  28. Smržová, D.; Szatmáry, L.; Ecorchard, P.; Machálková, A.; Maříková, M.; Salačová, P.; Straka, M. Carbon and Zeolite-Based Composites for Radionuclide and Heavy Metal Sorption. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12293.
  29. Paramitha, T.; Wulandari, W.; Rizkiana, J.; Sasongko, D. Performance Evaluation of Coal Fly Ash Based Zeolite A for Heavy Metal Ions Adsorption of Wastewater. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 543, 012095.
  30. Nagappan, S.; Park, S.S.; Kim, B.K.; Yoo, D.G.; Jo, N.J.; Lee, W.K.; Ha, C.S. Synthesis and Functionalisation of Mesoporous Materials for Transparent Coatings and Organic Dye Adsorption. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 10254–10262.
  31. Zhu, W.; Wang, J.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Luo, Y.; Han, C.; Ma, W.; He, S. Investigating the Heavy Metal Adsorption of Mesoporous Silica Materials Prepared by Microwave Synthesis. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 323.
  32. Da’na, E. Adsorption of Heavy Metals on Functionalized-Mesoporous Silica: A Review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 247, 145–157.
  33. Li, S.; Li, S.; Wen, N.; Wei, D.; Zhang, Y. Highly Effective Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Wastewater by Bifunctional Magnetic Mesoporous Silica. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 265, 118341.
  34. Zhai, Q.Z. Use of SBA-15 Ordered Nano Mesoporous Silica for Removal of Copper(II) from Aqueous Media: Studies on Equilibrium, Isotherm, Kinetics and Thermodynamics. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103069.
  35. Knight, A.W.; Tigges, A.B.; Ilgen, A.G. Adsorption of Copper (II) on Mesoporous Silica: The Effect of Nano-Scale Confinement. Geochem. Trans. 2018, 19, 13.
  36. Liu, S.; Phenrat, T.; Sui, Q.; Ezzeddine, Z.; Batonneau-Gener, I.; Pouilloux, Y. Zinc Removal from Water via EDTA-Modified Mesoporous SBA-16 and SBA-15. Toxics 2023, 11, 205.
  37. Humelnicu, D.; Ignat, M.; Dinu, M.V.; Dragan, E.S. Optimization of Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Amidoxime Resin Hosted by Mesoporous Silica. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 31069–31080.
  38. Wang, J.; Tong, X.; Chen, Y.; Sun, T.; Liang, L.; Wang, C. Enhanced Removal of Cr(III) in High Salt Organic Wastewater by EDTA Modified Magnetic Mesoporous Silica. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 303, 110262.
  39. Javaheri, F.; Kheshti, Z.; Ghasemi, S.; Altaee, A. Enhancement of Cd 2+ Removal from Aqueous Solution by Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica: Equilibrium Isotherms and Kinetics Study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 224, 199–208.
  40. Peng, Y.; Luo, L.; Luo, S.; Peng, K.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, Q.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y. Efficient Removal of Antimony(III) in Aqueous Phase by Nano-Fe3O4 Modified High-Iron Red Mud: Study on Its Performance and Mechanism. Water 2021, 13, 809.
  41. Kobylinska, N.G.; Kessler, V.G.; Seisenbaeva, G.A.; Dudarko, O.A. In Situ Functionalized Mesoporous Silicas for Sustainable Remediation Strategies in Removal of Inorganic Pollutants from Contaminated Environmental Water. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 23576–23590.
  42. Karbalaee Hosseini, A.; Tadjarodi, A. Novel Zn Metal–Organic Framework with the Thiazole Sites for Fast and Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11430.
  43. Yusuff, A.S.; Popoola, L.T.; Babatunde, E.O. Adsorption of Cadmium Ion from Aqueous Solutions by Copper-Based Metal Organic Framework: Equilibrium Modeling and Kinetic Studies. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 9, 106.
  44. Nabipour, H.; Rohani, S.; Batool, S.; Yusuff, A.S. An Overview of the Use of Water-Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Removal of Cadmium Ion. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109131.
  45. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 101.
  46. Mei, D.; Liu, L.; Yan, B. Adsorption of Uranium (VI) by Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent-Organic Frameworks from Water. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 475, 214917.
  47. Bae, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, K.S.; Hwang, H.K.; Choi, H. Adsorptive Removal of Arsenic by Mesoporous Iron Oxide in Aquatic Systems. Water 2020, 12, 3147.
  48. Rahman, M.M.; Hafez, I.; Tajvidi, M.; Amirbahman, A. Highly Efficient Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Immobilized on Cellulose Nanofibril Aerogels for Arsenic Removal from Water. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2818.
  49. Nqombolo, A.; Munonde, T.S.; Makhetha, T.A.; Moutloali, R.M.; Nomngongo, P.N. Cobalt/Zinc Based Metal Organic Frameworks as an Effective Adsorbent for Improved Removal of As(V) and Cr(VI) in a Wide PH Range. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 1845–1855.
  50. Babapour, M.; Hadi Dehghani, M.; Alimohammadi, M.; Moghadam Arjmand, M.; Salari, M.; Rasuli, L.; Mubarak, N.M.; Ahmad Khan, N. Adsorption of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution Using Mesoporous Metal-Organic Framework-5 Functionalized with the Amino Acids: Characterization, Optimization, Linear and Nonlinear Kinetic Models. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 345, 117835.
  51. Guo, N.; Lv, X.; Li, Q.; Ren, T.; Song, H.; Yang, Q. Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution by Mesoporous α-FeOOH Nanoparticles: Performance and Mechanism. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 299, 110101.
  52. Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, K.; Kim, H.G.; Park, J.A.; Cho, S.H.; Hong, S.W.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.; et al. Investigation of the Mechanism of Chromium Removal in (3-Aminopropyl)Trimethoxysilane Functionalized Mesoporous Silica. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12078.
  53. Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Qiao, W.; Long, D.; Ling, L. Effective Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption on Mesoporous Carbon Microspheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 462, 200–207.
  54. Du, L.; Gao, P.; Liu, Y.; Minami, T.; Yu, C. Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution by Polypyrrole/Hollow Mesoporous Silica Particles. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 686.
  55. Ryu, S.; Naidu, G.; Moon, H.; Vigneswaran, S. Selective Copper Extraction by Multi-Modified Mesoporous Silica Material, SBA-15. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 697, 134070.
  56. Humelnicu, D.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Humelnicu, I.; Ignat, M.; Yushin, N.; Grozdov, D. Study on the SBA-15 Silica and ETS-10 Titanosilicate as Efficient Adsorbents for Cu(II) Removal from Aqueous Solution. Water 2022, 14, 857.
  57. Río, D.A.d.H.-D.; Aguilera-Alvarado, A.F.; Cano-Aguilera, I.; Martínez-Rosales, M.; Holmes, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous Aluminosilicates for Copper Removal from Aqueous Medium. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2012, 3, 485–491.
  58. Mandal, S.; Calderon, J.; Marpu, S.B.; Omary, M.A.; Shi, S.Q. Mesoporous Activated Carbon as a Green Adsorbent for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Congo Red: Characterization, Adsorption Kinetics, and Isotherm Studies. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2021, 243, 103869.
  59. Khalifa, M.E.; Abdelrahman, E.A.; Hassanien, M.M.; Ibrahim, W.A. Application of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Modified with Dibenzoylmethane as a Novel Composite for Efficient Removal of Cd(II), Hg(II), and Cu(II) Ions from Aqueous Media. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 1234, 30, 2182–2196.
  60. Conte, N.; Díez, E.; Almendras, B.; Gómez, J.M.; Rodríguez, A. Sustainable Recovery of Cobalt from Aqueous Solutions Using an Optimized Mesoporous Carbon. J. Sustain. Metall. 2023, 9, 266–279.
  61. Chen, Y.; Gao, J.; Wen, X.; Wu, W. Efficient Removal of Cadmium Using Facile Functionalized of Mesoporous Silica via a Biomimetic Coating. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 18340–18347.
  62. Thakur, A.K.; Nisola, G.M.; Limjuco, L.A.; Parohinog, K.J.; Torrejos, R.E.C.; Shahi, V.K.; Chung, W.J. Polyethylenimine-Modified Mesoporous Silica Adsorbent for Simultaneous Removal of Cd(II) and Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 49, 133–144.
  63. Rabie, A.M.; Abd El-Salam, H.M.; Betiha, M.A.; El-Maghrabi, H.H.; Aman, D. Mercury Removal from Aqueous Solution via Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with the Amine Compound. Egypt. J. Pet. 2019, 28, 289–296.
  64. Zinicovscaia, I.; Yushin, N.; Humelnicu, D.; Grozdov, D.; Ignat, M.; Humelnicu, I. Adsorption Capacity of Silica SBA-15 and Titanosilicate ETS-10 toward Indium Ions. Materials 2023, 16, 3201.
  65. Awual, M.R. Mesoporous Composite Material for Efficient Lead(II) Detection and Removal from Aqueous Media. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103124.
  66. Zhang, X.; Hao, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. Rapid Removal of Zinc(II) from Aqueous Solutions Using a Mesoporous Activated Carbon Prepared from Agricultural Waste. Materials 2017, 10, 1002.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback