Postharvest Diseases Management of Fruits and Vegetables: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Horticulture
Contributor:
Farid Moradinezhad
,
Azam Ranjbar

Sustainable agriculture requires factors to directly stimulate plant growth and induce the plant’s innate immune system to protect against stresses. Protection of plants is one of the main approaches to the supply of food resource. Furthermore, improved techniques for plant disease management must be environmentally sustainable, reliable, acceptable by society, and chemical-free to ensure sustainable food security. Although it is not possible to accurately determine postharvest losses due to diseases and physiological disorders, the use of proper harvesting and transportation methods that minimize damage to the product, along with optimal storage conditions that prevent the development of diseases, will be effective in reducing these postharvest losses. Since handling and storage conditions are potential threats for postharvest spoilage, it is necessary to identify environmentally friendly approaches and their precision mechanisms for postharvest disease management. Recently, biological control, non-chemical, and eco-friendly techniques have been investigated for this purpose.

  • biological control
  • biosensors
  • combined treatments
  • edible coatings
  • nanotechnology

1. Introduction

Plant diseases are a major threat to various ecosystems and crops, so researchers develop new strategies to prevent pathogen growth and increase produce quality. The use of resistant species and cultivars produced by gene transfer [1] is eco-friendly and affordable in inhibiting losses caused by pathogens [2][3]. As well, the selection of somaclonal variation and mutation induction provides an essential strategy for disease management [4]. The importance of genes such as smutin and peroxidase that contain antifungal compounds for inducing resistance to pathogens has been proved [5]. Down-regulation of terpenes in transgenic oranges induces defense reactions against Penicillium digitatum [6][7]. In addition, it has been noted that myrcene stimulates the spore germination of P. digitatum through the upregulation of central carbon and energy metabolism [8], and terpene limonene causes citrus green mold through the regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis in P. digitatum spores [9]. Additionally, appropriate agricultural practices [10], including lack of planting pathogen-host plants near fruit trees, removing sources of inoculation such as diseased branches or fruits, and using windbreaks to reduce spore dispersal will be effective [11].
The factors limiting the shelf life such as postharvest diseases are among the biological limitations that cause more economic losses than occur during cultivation [12][13]. Most postharvest pathogens are necrotrophic fungi that destroy cells using cell-wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) or mycotoxins (toxic secondary metabolites of fungi). Fungal species from the genera Alternaria, Aspergillus, Botrytis, Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Geotrichum, Gloeosporium, Monilinia, Mucor, Penicillium, and Rhizopus are known to produce mycotoxins and postharvest diseases [14][15]. Mycotoxins are low molecular weight compounds able to elicit a toxic response in humans through exposure at very low levels [16]. Postharvest disease development is influenced by pathogen biology, growth stage, and handling. Infection of pathogens could be delayed by using resistant cultivars [17]. On the other hand, the production of mycotoxins depends on physical, biological, and environmental factors [18]. The most important environmental factors are temperature, relative humidity, carbon dioxide levels, nutrient availability, and physical damage [19]. Due to the increase in world population, prevention of postharvest losses has become more critical. Generally, good agricultural practices and controlled storage conditions are essential to minimize pathogen contamination. In recent years, physical methods such as thermal treatments (hot water, steam heat, and hot air) to control plant pathogens have been effective [20][21][22]. The thermal process disrupts normal metabolism (ripening or senescence) by creating moderate and reversible stress [23]. Proteomic analysis showed that up-regulated proteins by heat treatment were related to defense response and redox metabolism. Therefore, the loss reduction is due to the expression of proteins related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism [24]. Investigating the effect of thermal processing on the microbiome of apple fruit indicates a decrease in fungal–bacterial diversity [25]. However, heat treatment has undesirable effects on nutritional quality among vitamin reduction, protein denaturation, and sensory properties [26]. In order to reduce the adverse effects, non-thermal food processing techniques such as ionizing radiation, cold plasma, and high-pressure processing pulse electric field radiation were used [27].

2. Postharvest Diseases Management

2.1. Biological Control

The primary benefit of a fruit-based diet is the modification of nutrients, including enrichment with fiber, phenolic compounds, and complex sugars that maintain a healthy microbiota in the human gut [28][29]. One of the most effective methods to prevent disease is the application of biological control agents (BCAs) [30]; through competition for nutrients, the production of secondary metabolites such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), lytic enzymes, and the activation of the plant defense system, they function as antagonists of fungal diseases [31][32][33] (Figure 1). Microbial antagonists significantly modulate the fruit microbiome and improve fruit health by inhibiting pathogenic aerobic microbial species and promoting beneficial microorganisms [34]. The role of endophytic microorganisms in increasing resistance to stresses, availability to nutrients, and promoting growth has been proven [35]. Endophytes Debaryomyces hansenii, Galactomyces geotrichum, Pichia kudriavzevii, Rhodotorula glutinis, and Schwanniomyces vanrijae isolated from apple fruit [36], Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacilli isolated from banana, guava, mango, papaya fruits [37], Metschnikowia, Hanseniaspora, Acinetobacter, Gluconobacter isolated from grape berries [38] and Lactobacillus plantarum CM-3 in strawberries [39] as microbial antagonists through the synthesis of phytohormones and VOCs inhibit fruit pathogens [40]. VOCs are low molecular weight compounds that are composed of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, terpenes, nitrides, and sulfides with strong antimicrobial effect [41].
Horticulturae 09 01099 g001
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms of action biological control agents against plant pathogens.
Acceptance of bacteria as BCAs in the control of fungal diseases can be attributed to their strong inhibitory capacity, rapid colonization, and low nutritional requirements [31][42]. Probiotic bacteria’s secondary metabolism enables them to synthesize and release secondary metabolites with antimicrobial capacity, such as non-volatile organic compounds and VOCs with a broad range of biological functions [43][44]. Bacterial antagonists belong to the group of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) [45]. PGPB are a group of non-pathogenic beneficial bacteria that live autonomously in the soil or rhizosphere, the phyllosphere (epiphytes), and plant tissues (endophytes) [46]. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) reduce the level of ethylene under stress and pathogen attack [47], suppress the activity of pathogens through competition for nutrients, production of lytic enzymes, inhibition of the synthesis of toxins [48], and stimulation of plant growth and survival [47]. PGPR both rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial strains inhibited Panama disease in field and greenhouse by inducing resistance to Fusarium wilt in banana [49], and compounds produced by PGPR such as antibiotics with pathogen control are related [50]. Antibiotics are a heterogeneous group of low molecular weight organic compounds [51] which inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic fungi such as Aspergillus flavus, Alternaria solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides by disrupting the structure of the cell wall or the function of the membrane of microorganisms, disrupting the synthesis of proteins and the function of respiratory enzymes [52]. Iturin, pyrrolnitrin, and syringeomycin are the most important antibiotics for postharvest diseases [53]. PGPR known as NJN-6 of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens produces various secondary metabolites for inhibiting soil-borne pathogens. Therefore, the NJN-6 strain reduced the severity of Panama disease and improved the growth of banana seedlings [30]. 
Bacteria indirectly activate local and systemic responses in plants [13]. Studies have shown that genes related to L-phenylalanine metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, and programmed cell death (PCD) regulation are induced by antagonistic microorganisms [54]. Bacterial antagonist B. siamensis decreased the expression of catalase (CAT); however, the expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was increased. Increasing SOD activity can enhance defense against pathogens [55]. In grapes, P. fluorescent and B. amyloliquefaciens reduce the incidence of B. cinerea by increasing the enzyme activity of CAT, peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and chalcone isomerase (CHI) [56][57]. It has been reported that Bacillus halotolerans and B. subtilis induce activities of POD, PPO, PAL, and CHI enzymes in strawberries and blueberries for resistance to B. cinerea [58][59]. The responses induced by Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus sonorensis against the pathogen P. digitatum in Indian gooseberries and grapes are considered a type of plant defense response [60][61]. The application of Aureobasidium pullulans cell suspension maintained chitinase and 1,3-glucanase levels of avocado fruit [62], and Serratia sp. bacterial extracts showed high potential to control postharvest rot caused by C. gloeosporioides in avocados [63]. Likewise, the extracts of B. subtilis, Pseudomonas brenneri, and Pseudomona koreensis significantly inhibited germination and hyphae growth of B. cinerea and A. alternata in blueberries by producing metabolites like arthrofactins [64].

2.2. Biosensors

Disease development is closely related to physiological stages, host tissue characteristics, and environmental conditions. Biosensors transform biological responses into detectable electrical signals [65]. Biosensors such as antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, cells, organelles, microorganisms, enzymes, and nucleic acid [65] have the capacity to monitor the microbial flora of fruits and vegetables. Antibodies and antimicrobial peptide-based biosensor design to detect bacteria due to their superior properties such as stability, multiple site for bacteria capture and high specificity were considered [66]. Nucleic acids are molecules with high affinity and specificity to interact with a target [67] and enzymatic sensors measure target components by utilizing the catalytic reaction of enzymes with sugars, amino acids, proteins, and lipids as substrates [67]. The development of sensors based on phytochemicals or ripening genes is effective in controlling spoilage. Recently, a sensor composed of a metal catalyst and carbon nanotubes has been developed to monitor ethylene to determine the time of spoilage of fruits and vegetables [68]. Based on the luminescent responses of the bacteria to changes in VOCs following contamination, whole-cell bacterial biosensors can detect P. digitatum in oranges [69]. In this way, a colorimetric sensor containing AuNPs modified with the Aspergillus niger spore-binding peptide was developed to detect A. niger spores [70]. Addition of nanoparticles to electrochemical biosensors was used for rapid monitoring of Penicillium through immobilization of penicillinase enzyme using N-5-azido-2-nitrobenzoemideyl [71].

2.3. Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology use is efficient for antimicrobial agents in fresh products. Nanomaterials offer advantages such as bioavailability, controlled release, bio preservatives, and performance improvement. Nanoparticles are variable in size and amorphous or crystalline and are able to link with biological molecules like nucleic acids, peptides, and proteins [72][73]. A wide range of metals and their oxide-based single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes and nanocomposites have been used. Gold, silver, zinc, cerium, titanium dioxide (TiO2), silica, silica–silver, alumina–silicate, and chitosan are nanoparticles used to control plant pathogens [74][75].
The fungicidal activity of TiO2 nanoparticles has been proven against fungal pathogens Venturia inaequalis and Fusarium solani [76] and likewise manganese oxide (MnO2) nanoparticles against the pathogens causing wilt diseases in watermelon, eggplant, and tomatoes [77]. The inhibition of pathogens B. cinerea and P. expansum by using nanoparticles of zinc oxide is due to the induction of reactive oxygen species [78]. A honeycomb-like structure of silica nanoparticles is used in the targeted delivery of DNA and chemicals into plants [79]. Similarly, growth suppression of B. cinerea, C. gloeosporioides, Magnaporthe grisea, and Pythium ultimum was shown in solution of silica–silver [80]. Mycotoxin determination of pathogens has been conducted using nanocarbon materials like carbon nanowires and nanotubes [81]. Spray drying, precipitation, ionic gelation, emulsion cross-linking, sieving, and reverse micellar are used to produce chitosan-based agro-nanochemicals [82]. Chitosan-based nanoparticles have been used to reduce postharvest decay [83][84] through an inhibitory effect against Aspergillus sp., Fusarium sp., and Alternaria sp. [85]. Nanomaterials with chitosan coating films can control mesophilic aerobic, yeast, and mold contaminations by modulating the ripening index and increasing enzyme activities [86]. The chitosan-AgNPs based-composite showed remarkably higher antifungal activity against C. gloeosporioides [87]. Nanocomposites of selenium and chitosan nanoparticles synthesized using pomegranate peel extracts and Fenneropenaeus indicus shells stimulated the deformation of P. digitatum hyphae [88]. Thyme oil in an edible coating based on chitosan nanoparticles showed complete inhibition of C. gloeosporioides of avocado [89].

2.4. Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)

PGRs are factors affecting gene expression and related biological activities. As a short- to medium-term strategy, plant-derived natural compounds, such as plant hormones, associated with defense systems have been considered [90]. Melatonin (MT), as a signaling molecule and antioxidant [91], is vital in physiological processes [92], response to stresses [93], and resistance to pathogens [94]. Exogenous application of MT significantly increased disease resistance in strawberries [95], kiwi [96], plums [97], bananas [95], and grapes [98] and reduced decay. The effects of synergism MT with NO and ROS induce disease resistance [99][100]. Induction of resistance by MT is associated with the expression of defense genes/proteins, such as POD, lipid transfer proteins (LTPs), chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins [98][101]. MT and NO induce phytohormones such as SA, JA, and MAPK signaling pathways [102][103]. Exogenous melatonin stimulated endogenous melatonin production in the mesocarp and exocarp of plum, and total phenol and anthocyanin increased in the mesocarp [104]. A rise in JA and its precursor (oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA)) was detected in mesocarp by hormonal analysis [104]. Therefore, melatonin induces the JA signaling pathway to increase total phenol and anthocyanins. JA is involved in promoting the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid compounds such as anthocyanins [105] by regulating the WD-repeat/bHLH/MYB complexes [106]. MeJA activates defense responses against stresses [107].
Artificial inoculation of table grapes immersed in MT showed that MT did not significantly inhibit hyphae growth and spore germination but reduced the severity of gray mold disease [108]. MT reduces the MDA content and prevents the increase in cell membrane permeability by synthesizing and accumulating phenols and flavonoids. Simultaneously, the activity of defense enzymes such as SOD, POD, CAT, PAL, PPO, chitinase, and β-1,3 glucanase significantly increases [109].
SA and MeJA are critical in plant interactions to induce systemic defense against pathogenic microorganisms [110]. The activity of PPO and POD, increased proportionally to the content of SA and JA in citrus treated and infected with P. italicum and P. digitatum, resulted in inhibiting both molds [111]. Pan et al. (2020) reported that MeJA significantly reduced the diameter of the lesions caused by B. dothidea on kiwifruit [112]. MeJA significantly increased the activity of defense-related enzymes such as CAT, POD, SOD, PPO, chitinase, and β-1,3-glucanase. It also increased the accumulation of total phenolic compounds, while lipid oxidation decreased [112]. MeJA increased the activity of PAL and 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL), total phenol, total flavonoid, lignin, individual phenols such as chlorogenic acid, neochlorogenic acid, and epicatechin in peach [113].

2.5. Edible Coatings

Natural films and coatings include polysaccharides (pectin, cellulose, starch, gums), lipids (fatty acids, acetylated glycerides, surfactants, waxes), proteins (fatty acids, collagen, gelatin, waxes, resins, whey), and composite polymers. The principal components for producing biodegradable films are film-forming biopolymers which include carbohydrates, proteins, solubilizing medium, and plasticizers [114]. The majority of the edible coating components are polysaccharides such as chitosan, alginate, cellulose, carrageenan, pectin, starch, and proteins such as whey and casein [115]. In addition to maintaining structural integrity due to the arrangement of hydrogen bonds, polysaccharide-based films have good barrier properties [116]. Protein-based coatings have lower moisture barrier properties than polysaccharide-based films [117]. Lipid-based coatings have very high moisture barrier properties due to the greater polarity difference [118]. Polysaccharides and proteins due to their hydrophilic nature are used for transport active components such as antioxidant and antimicrobial agents [119]. Starch and alginate are considered for bio-packaging due to their gelatinization properties [120] and the ability to form hydrogels and encapsulation barriers, respectively [121]. Chitosan has attracted attention due to its properties as a gelling agent and the ability to form hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions [122]. Low gaseous permeability is an important property of edible coating in order to slow down the respiration and transpiration processes, thereby delaying ripening and senescence. Among other features is the control of the migration of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and moisture from the outside environment into the products, the inertness of coating substances, nature transparent, non-toxic, non-sticky, low viscous, economical and possessing a quick drying nature, digestible, and no change in sensory characteristics (taste, smell or color) of products [123]. Reduced water loss, microbial decay inhibition, protection against chilling damage, and appearance enhancement are among the benefits of coatings in food preservation [124]. The mechanical properties of edible films and coatings are highly influenced by the types of biopolymers, and also the addition of plasticizers and surfactants [125]. Chitosan is one of the principal edible coatings in postharvest disease management of fresh products [126].
Some natural components have been used to formulate edible coatings. Natural gums can induce defense reactions and reduce plant diseases. Gum arabic increased PPO activity in strawberries [127], and peach gum increased PPO, POD, PAL, and chitinase activity in blueberries [128]. Propolis extract significantly reduced the postharvest microbial decay of blueberries [129]. The application of propolis extract in an edible gelatin coating on raspberries had an inhibitory effect on B. cinerea and P. digitatum strains [130]. The tragacanth gum coating preserves the sensory and quality properties of apple fruit by reducing the microbial load [131]. Corn starch with papaya leaf extract significantly extended the shelf life and decreased the fruit spoilage percentage [132]. The incorporation of antioxidant, antifungal, and antimicrobial additives in bioactive bio-packaging is common [133]. Chitosan–polylactic acid films containing Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil improved the flexibility and elongation at break of the film and controlled postharvest diseases in mango [134]. Increasing the concentration of cinnamaldehyde in chitosan-graph-based edible films, in addition to improving the mechanical properties of elastic modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at break, had antifungal properties against P. italicum and Rhizopus stolonifera [135]. The hydroxyl group in the EO chain replaces the internal hydrogen bonds between the polymers by forming hydrogen bonds and leads to an increase in the free spaces between the molecules, thus reducing the stiffness and increasing the flexibility of the film [136]. The reaction between essential oil compounds and the cell membrane of microorganisms results in antimicrobial properties [137]. The bioactive film based on chitosan and gum arabic with the addition of cinnamon essential oil created an entangled structure and the water barrier properties increased in addition to the antioxidant potential [138]. Pectin beeswax coating containing eugenol is a viable method to maintain the quality of citrus [139]. Although essential oils enhance antimicrobial properties, they may lead to low water-solubility and offensive odors from the edible coatings [140]. Therefore, the effectiveness of edible coatings was studied as a biological control strategy [141], and simultaneous use of edible coatings and probiotics was investigated for their antifungal activity [142].

2.6. Essential Oils (EOs)

Applying EOs is an eco-friendly and sustainable method for postharvest disease management [143]. The function of EOS against postharvest fungi happens at the level of the cell membrane (disruption of the cell membrane integrity) or at the level of cell metabolism (dysfunction of mitochondria, vacuole, and inhibition of efflux pumps) [144] EOs often have a complex composition containing terpenes (monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, norterpenes), phenylpropanoids, and sulfur and nitrogen compounds [145]. The synergistic effects of the constituents of EOs [146] reduce the possibility of pathogen survival or resistance [147]. It seems the presence of monoterpenes (hydrocarbon and oxygenated monoterpene) and sesquiterpenes (hydrocarbon, oxygenated sesquiterpenes) in EOs, is thought to produce antioxidant and antibacterial properties [148]. In fact, molecules with a phenolic structure, for example, thymol and carvacrol, or aldehydes, such as p-anisaldehyde and ketones, significantly inhibit pathogen growth [149]. Pomegranate peel phenolic extracts stimulate expression of PAL, chitinase, chalcone synthase (CHS), and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPKK), which contribute to the activation of plant defenses for response to reactive oxygen species (ROS) [150] and therefore inhibits the germination of P. italicum and P. digitatum conidia [150]. Applying EOs to manage mango anthracnose showed that clove and thyme oils inhibited conidia germination and mycelia growth [151]. An assay growth inhibition of fungal strains and Escherichia coli showed that the inhibitory activity of cinnamon and clove oils was due to the bioactive compounds of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol, respectively [152]. Thymol fumigation reduced anthracnose in avocados [153]. Thymol fumigation increased the activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, which can hydrolyze fungal cell wall polymers and activate plant defense systems [154]. Thymol inhibited citrus blue mold [155] and in addition to direct antifungal effects, it caused a rapid accumulation of hydrogen peroxide, leading to increased activity of defense enzymes such as β-1,3-glucanase, chitinase, PAL, POD, PPO, and LOX [155]. Thymol inhibits pomegranate fruit rot by disrupting the function of cell-wall-degrading enzyme fungi such as cellulase and pectinase [156].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/horticulturae9101099

References

  1. Dale, J.; James, A.; Paul, J.Y.; Khanna, H.; Smith, M.; Peraza-Echeverria, S.; Harding, R. Transgenic Cavendish bananas with resistance to Fusarium wilt tropical race 4. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1496.
  2. Panth, M.; Hassler, S.C.; Baysal-Gurel, F. Methods for management of soilborne diseases in crop production. Agriculture 2020, 10, 16.
  3. Xu, J.; Xian, Q.; Wang, K.; Dong, J.; Zhang, C.; Du, S.; Chen, X. Screening and identification of candidate Fusarium wilt-resistance genes from pumpkin. Hortic. Plant J. 2022, 8, 583–592.
  4. Xu, S.; Bai, T.; Zhang, L.; Fan, H.; Yang, P.; Yin, K.; Zheng, S. Evaluation of different banana varieties on Fusarium wilt TR4 resistance by phenotypic symptom and real-time quantitative PCR. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 30, 1997–2002.
  5. Brogden, K.A. Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 238–250.
  6. Rodríguez, A.; San Andrés, V.; Cervera, M.; Redondo, A.; Alquézar, B.; Shimada, T.; Peña, L. Terpene down-regulation in orange reveals the role of fruit aromas in mediating interactions with insect herbivores and pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 793–802.
  7. Rodríguez, A.; Shimada, T.; Cervera, M.; Alquézar, B.; Gadea, J.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Peña, L. Terpene down-regulation triggers defense responses in transgenic orange leading to resistance against fungal pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 321–339.
  8. Che, J.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; Tao, N. Metabolomics analysis reveals that myrcene stimulates the spore germination of Penicillium digitatum via the upregulation of central carbon and energy metabolism. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 170, 111329.
  9. Tao, N.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Zhu, A. The terpene limonene induced the green mold of citrus fruit through regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis in Penicillium digitatum spores. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 414–422.
  10. Alegbeleye, O.O.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Risks associated with the consumption of irrigation water contaminated produce: On the role of quantitative microbial risk assessment. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 88–98.
  11. Pruvost, O.; Couteau, A.; Luisetti, J. Development of bacterial black spot of mangoes and epiphytic populations of the pathogen (Xanthomonas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae) under natural conditions in Reunion. Fruits 1990, 45, 125–140.
  12. Dukare, A.S.; Paul, S.; Nambi, V.E.; Gupta, R.K.; Singh, R.; Sharma, K.; Vishwakarma, R.K. Exploitation of microbial antagonists for the control of postharvest diseases of fruits: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1498–1513.
  13. Huang, X.; Ren, J.; Li, P.; Feng, S.; Dong, P.; Ren, M. Potential of microbial endophytes to enhance the resistance to postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 1744–1757.
  14. Leyva Salas, M.; Mounier, J.; Valence, F.; Coton, M.; Thierry, A.; Coton, E. Antifungal microbial agents for food biopreservation—A review. Microorganisms 2021, 5, 37.
  15. Oufensou, S.; Ul Hassan, Z.; Balmas, V.; Jaoua, S.; Migheli, Q. Perfume Guns: Potential of Yeast Volatile Organic Compounds in the Biological Control of Mycotoxin-Producing Fungi. Toxins 2023, 15, 45.
  16. Gallo, A.; Giuberti, G.; Frisvad, J.C.; Bertuzzi, T.; Nielsen, K.F. Review on mycotoxin issues in ruminants: Occurrence in forages, effects of mycotoxin ingestion on health status and animal performance and practical strategies to counteract their negative effects. Toxins 2015, 7, 3057–3111.
  17. Sangchote, S. Botryodiplodia stem end rot of mango and its control. In III International Mango Symposium; Acta Hortic.: Darvin, NT, Australia, 1989; Volume 291, pp. 296–303.
  18. Lee, H.J.; Ryu, D. Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals and cereal-derived food products: Public health perspectives of their co-occurrence. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7034–7051.
  19. Wielogórska, E.; MacDonald, S.; Elliott, C.T. A review of the efficacy of mycotoxin detoxifying agents used in feed in light of changing global environment and legislation. World Mycotoxin J. 2016, 9, 419–433.
  20. Usall, J.; Ippolito, A.; Sisquella, M.; Neri, F. Physical treatments to control postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 122, 30–40.
  21. Papoutsis, K.; Mathioudakis, M.M.; Hasperue, J.H.; Ziogas, V. Non-chemical treatments for preventing the postharvest fungal rotting of citrus caused by Penicillium digitatum (green mold) and Penicillium italicum (blue mold). Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 479–491.
  22. Bosch, Y.; Britt, E.; Perren, S.; Naef, A.; Frey, J.E.; Buhlmann, A. Dynamics of the apple fruit microbiome after harvest and implications for fruit quality. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 272.
  23. Perini, M.A.; Sin, I.N.; Jara, A.M.R.; Lobato, M.E.G.; Civello, P.M.; Martínez, G.A. Hot water treatments performed in the base of the broccoli stem reduce postharvest senescence of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Var italic) heads stored at 20 C. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 77, 314–322.
  24. Wu, Z.; Yuan, X.; Li, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Heat acclimation reduces postharvest loss of table grapes during cold storage–Analysis of possible mechanisms involved through a proteomic approach. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 105, 26–33.
  25. Wassermann, B.; Kusstatscher, P.; Berg, G. Microbiome response to hot water treatment and potential synergy with biological control on stored apples. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2502.
  26. Moreno-Vilet, L.; Hernández-Hernández, H.M.; Villanueva-Rodríguez, S.J. Current status of emerging food processing technologies in Latin America: Novel thermal processing. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 50, 196–206.
  27. Delorme, M.M.; Guimarães, J.T.; Coutinho, N.M.; Balthazar, C.F.; Rocha, R.S.; Silva, R.; Cruz, A.G. Ultraviolet radiation: An interesting technology to preserve quality and safety of milk and dairy foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 146–154.
  28. Hirt, H. Healthy soils for healthy plants for healthy humans: How beneficial microbes in the soil, food and gut are interconnected and how agriculture can contribute to human health. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, 51069.
  29. Loo, Y.T.; Howell, K.; Chan, M.; Zhang, P.; Ng, K. Modulation of the human gut microbiota by phenolics and phenolic fiber-rich foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1268–1298.
  30. Fu, L.; Penton, C.R.; Ruan, Y.; Shen, Z.; Xue, C.; Li, R.; Shen, Q. Inducing the rhizosphere microbiome by biofertilizer application to suppress banana Fusarium wilt disease. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 104, 39–48.
  31. Lastochkina, O.; Seifikalhor, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Baymiev, A.; Pusenkova, L.; Garipova, S.; Maksimov, I. Bacillus spp.: Efficient biotic strategy to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plants 2019, 8, 97.
  32. Luksa, J.; Vepstaitė-Monstavicė, I.; Apsegaitė, V.; Blazytė-Čereskienė, L.; Staneviciene, R.; Strazdaitė-Žielienė, Ž.; Serviene, E. Fungal microbiota of sea buckthorn berries at two ripening stages and volatile profiling of potential biocontrol yeasts. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 456.
  33. Romero, J.; Albertos, I.; Díez-Méndez, A.; Poveda, J. Control of postharvest diseases in berries through edible coatings and bacterial probiotics. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111326.
  34. Berg, G.; Rybakova, D.; Fischer, D.; Cernava, T.; Vergès, M.C.C.; Charles, T.; Schloter, M. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020, 8, 103.
  35. Kaul, S.; Sharma, T.; Dhar, M.K. “Omics” tools for better understanding the plant–endophyte interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 955.
  36. Madbouly, A.K.; Elyousr, K.A.A.; Ismail, I.M. Biocontrol of Monilinia fructigena, causal agent of brown rot of apple fruit, by using endophytic yeasts. Biol. Control 2020, 144, 104239.
  37. Cruz, A.F.; Barka, G.D.; Blum, L.E.B.; Tanaka, T.; Ono, N.; Kanaya, S.; Reineke, A. Evaluation of microbial communities in peels of Brazilian tropical fruits by amplicon sequence analysis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 739–748.
  38. Hall, M.E.; Wilcox, W.F. Identification and frequencies of endophytic microbes within healthy grape berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2019, 70, 212–219.
  39. Chen, C.; Cao, Z.; Li, J.; Tao, C.; Feng, Y.; Han, Y. A novel endophytic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum CM-3 with antagonistic activity against Botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruit. Biol. Control 2020, 148, 104306.
  40. Fresno, D.H.; Munné-Bosch, S. Differential tissue-specific jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and abscisic acid dynamics in sweet cherry development and their implications in fruit-microbe interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 640601.
  41. Lemfack, M.C.; Gohlke, B.O.; Toguem, S.M.T.; Preissner, S.; Piechulla, B.; Preissner, R. mVOC 2.0: A database of microbial volatiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 261–265.
  42. Carmona-Hernandez, S.; Reyes-Pérez, J.J.; Chiquito-Contreras, R.G.; Rincon-Enriquez, G.; Cerdan-Cabrera, C.R.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G. Biocontrol of postharvest fruit fungal diseases by bacterial antagonists: A review. Agronomy 2019, 9, 121.
  43. Keswani, C.; Singh, H.B.; García-Estrada, C.; Caradus, J.; He, Y.W.; Mezaache-Aichour, S.; Sansinenea, E. Antimicrobial secondary metabolites from agriculturally important bacteria as next-generation pesticides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1013–1034.
  44. Poveda, J. Beneficial effects of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) in plants. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 168, 104118.
  45. Ullah, A.; Nisar, M.; Ali, H.; Hazrat, A.; Hayat, K.; Keerio, A.A.; Yang, X. Drought tolerance improvement in plants: An endophytic bacterial approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7385–7397.
  46. Seifi Kalhor, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Seif, M.; Javadi, E.; Bernard, F.; Li, T.; Lastochkina, O. Rhizobacterium Bacillus subtilis reduces toxic effects of high electrical conductivity in soilless culture of lettuce. In International Symposium on New Technologies for Environment Control, Energy-Saving and Crop Production in Greenhouse and Plant; Acta Hortic.: Darvin, NT, Australia, 2017; Volume 1227, pp. 471–478.
  47. del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. ACC deaminase in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): An efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 235, 126439.
  48. Solanki, M.K.; Yandigeri, M.S.; Kumar, S.; Singh, R.K.; Srivastava, A.K. Co-inoculation of different antagonists can enhance the biocontrol activity against Rhizoctonia solani in tomato. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 1633–1644.
  49. Thangavelu, R.; Gopi, M. Field suppression of Fusarium wilt disease in banana by the combined application of native endophytic and rhizospheric bacterial isolates possessing multiple functions. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2015, 54, 241–252.
  50. Beneduzi, A.; Ambrosini, A.; Passaglia, L.M. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35, 1044–1051.
  51. Maksimov, I.V.; Veselova, S.V.; Nuzhnaya, T.V.; Sarvarova, E.R.; Khairullin, R.M. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in regulation of plant resistance to stress factors. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 715–726.
  52. Duffy, B.; Schouten, A.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Pathogen self-defense: Mechanisms to counteract microbial antagonism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003, 41, 501–538.
  53. Di Francesco, A.; Martini, C.; Mari, M. Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: How many mechanisms of action? Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 145, 711–717.
  54. Christopoulos, M.V.; Tsantili, E. Participation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in increased phenolic compounds in fresh cold stressed walnut (Juglans regia L.) kernels. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 104, 17–25.
  55. Singh, B.; Kaur, N.; Kumar, P.; Hallan, V.; Pati, P.K. Reactive oxygen species generating and scavenging systems play critical role in conferring leaf spot disease resistance in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 157, 112889.
  56. Jiang, M.Y.; Wang, Z.R.; Chen, K.W.; Kan, J.Q.; Wang, K.T.; Zalán, Z.S.; Du, M.Y. Inhibition of postharvest gray mold decay and induction of disease resistance by Pseudomonas fluorescens in grapes. Acta Aliment. 2019, 48, 288–296.
  57. Zhou, Q.; Fu, M.; Xu, M.; Chen, X.; Qiu, J.; Wang, F.; Chen, L. Application of antagonist Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NCPSJ7 against Botrytis cinerea in postharvest Red Globe grapes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1499–1508.
  58. Wang, F.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Liu, L.; Deng, J. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of Bacillus halotolerans against Botrytis cinerea causing grey mold in postharvest strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111456.
  59. Lu, Y.; Ma, D.; He, X.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J. Bacillus subtilis KLBC BS6 induces resistance and defense-related response against Botrytis cinerea in blueberry fruit. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 114, 101599.
  60. Sen, S.; Sengupta, P.; Molla, J.; Mukherjee, K.; Acharya, K. Management of postharvest green mold decay in common mandarin and Indian gooseberry with Bacillus licheniformis SR-14. J. Appl. Hortic. 2018, 20, 129–135.
  61. Deng, J.; Kong, S.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, X. Identification of a new Bacillus sonorensis strain KLBC GS-3 as a biocontrol agent for postharvest green mold in grapefruit. Biol. Control 2020, 151, 104393.
  62. Madhupani, Y.D.S.; Adikaram, N.K.B. Delayed incidence of stem-end rot and enhanced defences in Aureobasidium pullulans-treated avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2017, 124, 227–234.
  63. Granada, D.; Lopez-Lujan, L.; Ramirez-Restrepo, S.; Morales, J.; Pelaez-Jaramillo, C.; Andrade, G.; Bedoya-pérez, J.C. Bacterial extracts and bioformulates as a promising control of fruit body rot and root rot in avocado cv. Hass. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 748–758.
  64. Kurniawan, O.; Wilson, K.; Mohamed, R.; Avis, T.J. Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp. provide antifungal activity against gray mold and Alternaria rot on blueberry fruit. Biol. Control 2018, 126, 136–141.
  65. Qiao, Z.; Fu, Y.; Lei, C.; Li, Y. Advances in antimicrobial peptides-based biosensing methods for detection of foodborne pathogens: A review. Food Control 2020, 112, 107116.
  66. Islam, M.A.; Karim, A.; Ethiraj, B.; Raihan, T.; Kadier, A. Antimicrobial peptides: Promising alternatives over conventional capture ligands for biosensor-based detection of pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 55, 107901.
  67. Zhang, Y.; Lai, B.S.; Juhas, M. Recent advances in aptamer discovery and applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 941.
  68. Fong, D.; Luo, S.X.L.; Andre, R.S.; Swager, T.M. Trace ethylene sensing via wacker oxidation. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 507–512.
  69. Chalupowicz, D.; Veltman, B.; Droby, S.; Eltzov, E. Evaluating the use of biosensors for monitoring of Penicillium digitatum infection in citrus fruit. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 311, 127896.
  70. Lee, J.I.; Jang, S.C.; Chung, J.; Choi, W.K.; Hong, C.; Ahn, G.R.; Chung, W.J. Colorimetric allergenic fungal spore detection using peptide-modified gold nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 327, 128894.
  71. Sistani, P.; Sofimaryo, L.; Masoudi, Z.R.; Sayad, A.; Rahimzadeh, R.; Salehi, B. A penicillin biosensor by using silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014, 9, 6201–6212.
  72. Machado, S.; Pacheco, J.G.; Nouws, H.P.A.; Albergaria, J.T.; Delerue-Matos, C. Characterization of green zero-valent iron nanoparticles produced with tree leaf extracts. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 533, 76–81.
  73. Wang, P.; Lombi, E.; Zhao, F.J.; Kopittke, P.M. Nanotechnology: A new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 699–712.
  74. Igiebor, F.A.; Ikhajiagbe, B.; Asia, M. Green Nanotechnology: A modern tool for Sustainable Agriculture in Nigeria–A Review. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2023, 10, 269–286.
  75. Yadav, S.; Sawarni, N.; Dahiya, T.; Rana, J.S.; Sharma, M.; Batra, B. Nanoagriculture: Advantages and Drawbacks. In Agricultural and Environmental Nanotechnology: Novel Technologies and Their Ecological Impact; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 3–42.
  76. Boxi, S.S.; Mukherjee, K.; Paria, S. Ag doped hollow TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective green fungicide against Fusarium solani and Venturia inaequalis phytopathogens. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 085103.
  77. Elmer, W.; De La Torre-Roche, R.; Pagano, L.; Majumdar, S.; Zuverza-Mena, N.; Dimkpa, C.; White, J.C. Effect of metalloid and metal oxide nanoparticles on Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1394–1401.
  78. Sharma, R.; Garg, R.; Kumari, A. A review on biogenic synthesis, applications and toxicity aspects of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Exp. Clin. Sci. J. 2020, 19, 1325.
  79. Wang, Z.; Wei, F.; Liu, S.Y.; Xu, Q.; Huang, J.Y.; Dong, X.Y.; Chen, H. Electrocatalytic oxidation of phytohormone salicylic acid at copper nanoparticles-modified gold electrode and its detection in oilseed rape infected with fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Talanta 2020, 80, 1277–1281.
  80. Subbenaik, S.C. Physical and chemical nature of nanoparticles. In Plant Nanotechnology: Principles and Practices; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 15–27.
  81. Abu-Salah, K.M.; Zourob, M.M.; Mouffouk, F.; Alrokayan, S.A.; Alaamery, M.A.; Ansari, A.A. DNA-based nanobiosensors as an emerging platform for detection of disease. Sensors 2015, 15, 14539–14568.
  82. Agarwal, M.; Nagar, D.P.; Srivastava, N.; Agarwal, M.K. Chitosan Nanoparticles based Drug Delivery: An Update. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. 2015, 2, 1–13.
  83. Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, R. Chitosan nano emulsions as advanced edible coatings for fruits and vegetables: Composition, fabrication and developments in last decade. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 154–170.
  84. Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: Emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives. Trends Food Sci. 2020, 97, 196–209.
  85. Sahab, A.F.; Waly, A.I.; Sabbour, M.M.; Nawar, L.S. Synthesis, antifungal and insecticidal potential of Chitosan (CS)-g-poly (acrylic acid) (PAA) nanoparticles against some seed borne fungi and insects of soybean. Int. J. ChemTech. Res. 2015, 8, 589–598.
  86. Li, Y.; Rokayya, S.; Jia, F.; Nie, X.; Xu, J.; Elhakem, A.; Helal, M. Shelf-life, quality, safety evaluations of blueberry fruits coated with chitosan nano-material films. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 55.
  87. Chowdappa, P.; Gowda, S.; Chethana, C.S.; Madhura, S. Antifungal activity of chitosan-silver nanoparticle composite against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with mango anthracnose. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 8, 1803–1812.
  88. Salem, M.F.; Abd-Elraoof, W.A.; Tayel, A.A.; Alzuaibr, F.M.; Abonama, O.M. Antifungal application of biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles with pomegranate peels and nanochitosan as edible coatings for citrus green mold protection. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 182.
  89. Correa-Pacheco, Z.N.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Valle-Marquina, M.Á.; Hernández-López, M. The effect of nanostructured chitosan and chitosan-thyme essential oil coatings on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides growth in vitro and on cv Hass avocado and fruit quality. J. Phytopathol. 2017, 165, 297–305.
  90. Wan, C.; Kahramanoğlu, İ.; Okatan, V. Application of plant natural products for the management of postharvest diseases in fruits. Folia Hortic. 2021, 33, 203–215.
  91. Hu, W.; Kong, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Z.; Tie, W.; Guo, A. Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal the actions of melatonin in the delay of postharvest physiological deterioration of cassava. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 736.
  92. Sun, C.; Liu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Jin, C.; Lin, X. Melatonin: A master regulator of plant development and stress responses. J. Integ. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 126–145.
  93. Nawaz, K.; Chaudhary, R.; Sarwar, A.; Ahmad, B.; Gul, A.; Hano, C.; Anjum, S. Melatonin as master regulator in plant growth, development and stress alleviator for sustainable agricultural production: Current status and future perspectives. Sustainability 2020, 13, 294.
  94. Li, T.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, H.; Yun, Z. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis reveals the effect of melatonin on delaying anthracnose incidence upon postharvest banana fruit peel. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 289.
  95. Aghdam, M.S.; Fard, J.R. Melatonin treatment attenuates postharvest decay and maintains nutritional quality of strawberry fruits (Fragaria× anannasa cv. Selva) by enhancing GABA shunt activity. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1650–1657.
  96. Hu, M.; Li, J.; Rao, J. Effect of melatonin on ripening and senescence of postharvest kiwifruits. Food Sci. 2018, 39, 226–232.
  97. Bal, E. Physicochemical changes in ‘Santa Rosa’ plum fruit treated with melatonin during cold storage. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1713–1720.
  98. Gao, S.; Ma, W.; Lyu, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, Y. Melatonin may increase disease resistance and flavonoid biosynthesis through effects on DNA methylation and gene expression in grape berries. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 231.
  99. Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Cong, L.; Zhai, R.; Yang, C.; Xu, L. Melatonin inhibits ethylene synthesis via nitric oxide regulation to delay postharvest senescence in pears. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2279–2288.
  100. Zhang, W.; Cao, J.; Fan, X.; Jiang, W. Applications of nitric oxide and melatonin in improving postharvest fruit quality and the separate and crosstalk biochemical mechanisms. Trends Food Sci. 2020, 99, 531–541.
  101. Lin, Y.; Fan, L.; Xia, X.; Wang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Z. Melatonin decreases resistance to postharvest green mold on citrus fruit by scavenging defense-related reactive oxygen species. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 153, 21–30.
  102. Palma, J.M.; Freschi, L.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; González-Gordo, S.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric oxide in the physiology and quality of fleshy fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4405–4417.
  103. Tijero, V.; Munoz, P.; Munné-Bosch, S. Melatonin as an inhibitor of sweet cherries ripening in orchard trees. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 140, 88–95.
  104. Arabia, A.; Munne-Bosch, S.; Muñoz, P. Melatonin triggers tissue-specific changes in anthocyanin and hormonal contents during postharvest decay of Angeleno plums. Plant Sci. 2022, 320, 111287.
  105. Pauwels, L.; Morreel, K.; De Witte, E.; Lammertyn, F.; Van Montagu, M.; Boerjan, W.; Goossens, A. Mapping methyl jasmonate-mediated transcriptional reprogramming of metabolism and cell cycle progression in cultured Arabidopsis cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1380–1385.
  106. Qi, T.; Song, S.; Ren, Q.; Wu, D.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Xie, D. The Jasmonate-ZIM-domain proteins interact with the WD-Repeat/bHLH/MYB complexes to regulate Jasmonate-mediated anthocyanin accumulation and trichome initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2011, 23, 1795–1814.
  107. Di, X.; Takken, F.L.; Tintor, N. How phytohormones shape interactions between plants and the soil-borne fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 170.
  108. Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Xue, J.; Mu, B.; Song, H.; Liu, Y. Exogenous melatonin treatment induces disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea on post-harvest grapes by activating defence responses. Foods 2022, 11, 2231.
  109. Li, S.; Huan, C.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Bi, Y. Melatonin induces improved protection against Botrytis cinerea in cherry tomato fruit by activating salicylic acid signaling pathway. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111299.
  110. Wang, Z.; Jia, C.; Li, J.; Huang, S.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z. Activation of salicylic acid metabolism and signal transduction can enhance resistance to Fusarium wilt in banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Cavendish). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 47–62.
  111. Moosa, A.; Sahi, S.T.; Khan, S.A.; Malik, A.U. Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid can suppress green and blue molds of citrus fruit and induce the activity of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase. Folia Hortic. 2019, 31, 195–204.
  112. Pan, L.; Zhao, X.; Chen, M.; Fu, Y.; Xiang, M.; Chen, J. Effect of exogenous methyl jasmonate treatment on disease resistance of postharvest kiwifruit. Food Chem. 2020, 305, 125483.
  113. Ji, N.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y. Involvement of PpWRKY70 in the methyl jasmonate primed disease resistance against Rhizopus stolonifer of peaches via activating phenylpropanoid pathway. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111466.
  114. Andriani, V.; Handayani, N.A. Recent technology of edible coating production: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 87, 200–206.
  115. Teixeira-Costa, B.E.; Andrade, C.T. Natural polymers used in edible food packaging—History, function and application trends as a sustainable alternative to synthetic plastic. Polysaccharides 2021, 3, 32–58.
  116. Llanes, L.; Dubessay, P.; Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Michaud, P. Biosourced polysaccharide-based superabsorbents. Polysaccharides 2020, 1, 51–79.
  117. Fernández-Pan, I.; Carrión-Granda, X.; Maté, J.I. Antimicrobial efficiency of edible coatings on the preservation of chicken breast fillets. Food Control 2014, 36, 69–75.
  118. Kumar, N. Polysaccharide-based component and their relevance in edible film/coating: A review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 49, 793–823.
  119. Marcuzzo, E.; Sensidoni, A.; Debeaufort, F.; Voilley, A. Encapsulation of aroma compounds in biopolymeric emulsion based edible films to control flavour release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 984–988.
  120. Zhang, Y.; Han, J.; Liu, Z. Starch-based edible films. In Environmentally Compatible Food Packaging; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2008; pp. 108–136.
  121. Lee, K.Y.; Mooney, D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 106–126.
  122. Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Kan, J.; Jin, C. Physical, mechanical and antioxidant properties of chitosan films grafted with different hydroxybenzoic acids. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 71, 176–186.
  123. Dhall, R.K. Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 435–450.
  124. Firdous, N.; Moradinezhad, F.; Farooq, F.; Dorostkar, M. Advances in formulation, functionality, and application of edible coatings on fresh produce and fresh-cut products: A review. Food Chem. 2022, 407, 135186.
  125. Tadros, T. Surfactants. In Encyclopedia of Colloid and Interface Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1249–1250.
  126. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E.; Sivakumar, D. Chitosan, a biopolymer with triple action on postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables: Eliciting, antimicrobial and film-forming properties. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2745.
  127. Tahir, H.E.; Xiaobo, Z.; Jiyong, S.; Mahunu, G.K.; Zhai, X.; Mariod, A.A. Quality and postharvest-shelf life of cold-stored strawberry fruit as affected by gum arabic (Acacia senegal) edible coating. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12527.
  128. Shi, Z.; Deng, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J. Individual and combined effects of bamboo vinegar and peach gum on postharvest grey mold caused by Botrytis cinerea in blueberry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 155, 86–93.
  129. Pobiega, K.; Igielska, M.; Włodarczyk, P.; Gniewosz, M. The use of pullulan coatings with propolis extract to extend the shelf life of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) fruit. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 1013–1020.
  130. Nasirifar, S.Z.; Maghsoudlou, Y.; Oliyaei, N. Effect of active lipid-based coating incorporated with nanoclay and orange peel essential oil on physicochemical properties of Citrus sinensis. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1508–1518.
  131. Jahanshahi, B.; Jafari, A.; Vazifeshenas, M.R.; Gholamnejad, J. A novel edible coating for apple fruits. J. Hortic. Postharvest Res. 2018, 1, 63–72.
  132. Chithra, M.; Sathees, N.; Venkatesan, S.; Thirupathi, M. Effect of edible herbal coatings to extend the shelf life of banana cv. ‘Ney Poovan’ (not exposed to smoke) stored at room temperature. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2022, 11, 185–188.
  133. Ganiari, S.; Choulitoudi, E.; Oreopoulou, V. Edible and active films and coatings as carriers of natural antioxidants for lipid food. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 70–82.
  134. Gunny, A.A.N.; Leem, S.J.; Makhtar, M.M.Z.; Zainuddin, N.I.; Mohd Roslim, M.H.; Raja Hashim, R.H.; Rafatullah, M. The Use of Essential Oil Embedded in Polylactic Acid/Chitosan-Based Film for Mango Post-Harvest Application against Pathogenic Fungi. Polymers 2023, 15, 2722.
  135. Demitri, C.; Tarantino, A.S.; Moscatello, A.; De Benedictis, V.M.; Madaghiele, M.; Sannino, A.; Maffezzoli, A. Graphene reinforced Chitosan-Cinnamaldehyde derivatives films: Antifungal activity and mechanical properties. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Nanotechnology in Instrumentation and Measurement (NANOFIM), Lecce, Italy, 24–25 July 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 25–29.
  136. Mo, X.; Peng, X.; Liang, X.; Fang, S.; Xie, H.; Chen, J.; Meng, Y. Development of antifungal gelatin-based nanocomposite films functionalized with natamycin-loaded zein/casein nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106506.
  137. Araújo, M.G.d.F.; Hilário, F.; Vilegas, W.; Dos Santos, L.C.; Brunetti, I.L.; Sotomayor, C.E.; Bauab, T.M. Correlation among antioxidant, antimicrobial, hemolytic, and antiproliferative properties of Leiothrix spiralis leaves extract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 9260–9277.
  138. Xu, T.; Gao, C.; Feng, X.; Yang, Y.; Shen, X.; Tang, X. Structure, physical and antioxidant properties of chitosan-gum arabic edible films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 230–236.
  139. Alvarez, M.V.; Palou, L.; Taberner, V.; Fernández-Catalán, A.; Argente-Sanchis, M.; Pitta, E.; Pérez-Gago, M.B. Natural Pectin-Based Edible Composite Coatings with Antifungal Properties to Control Green Mold and Reduce Losses of ‘Valencia’ Oranges. Foods 2022, 11, 1083.
  140. Yousuf, B.; Wu, S.; Siddiqui, M.W. Incorporating essential oils or compounds derived thereof into edible coatings: Effect on quality and shelf life of fresh/fresh-cut produce. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 245–257.
  141. Salgado-Cruz, M.D.L.P.; Salgado-Cruz, J.; García-Hernández, A.B.; Calderón-Domínguez, G.; Gómez-Viquez, H.; Oliver-Espinoza, R.; Yáñez-Fernández, J. Chitosan as a coating for biocontrol in postharvest products: A bibliometric review. Membranes 2021, 11, 421.
  142. Barragán-Menéndez, C.; Gálvez-López, D.; Rosas-Quijano, R.; Salvador-Figueroa, M.; Ovando-Medina, I.; Vázquez-Ovando, A. Films of chitosan and Aloe vera for maintaining the viability and antifungal activity of Lactobacillus paracasei TEP6. Coatings 2020, 10, 259.
  143. Sarkhosh, A.; Schaffer, B.; Vargas, A.I.; Palmateer, A.J.; Lopez, P.; Soleymani, A.; Farzaneh, M. Antifungal activity of five plant-extracted essential oils against anthracnose in papaya fruit. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2018, 34, 18–26.
  144. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; Feo, V.D. Essential oils and antifungal activity. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 86.
  145. Carson, C.F.; Hammer, K.A. Chemistry and Bioactivity of Essential Oils. In Lipids and Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents; Thormar, H., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester West Sussex, UK, 2010.
  146. Singh, P.; Pandey, A.K. Prospective of essential oils of the genus Mentha as biopesticides: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1295.
  147. Khan, M.R.; Chonhenchob, V.; Huang, C.; Suwanamornlert, P. Antifungal activity of propyl disulfide from neem (Azadirachta indica) in vapor and agar diffusion assays against anthracnose pathogens (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum acutatum) in mango fruit. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 839.
  148. Yin, G.; Zhang, Y.; Pennerman, K.K.; Wu, G.; Hua, S.S.T.; Yu, J.; Bennett, J.W. Characterization of blue mold Penicillium species isolated from stored fruits using multiple highly conserved loci. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 12.
  149. Barrera-Necha, L.L.; Bautista-Banos, S.; Flores-Moc, H.E.; Estudillo, A.R. Efficacy of Essential Oils on the Conidial Germination, Growth of Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. and Sacc and Control of Postharvest Diseases in Papaya (Carica Papaya L.). Plant Pathol. J. 2008, 7, 174–178.
  150. Pangallo, S.; Li Destri Nicosia, M.G.; Raphael, G.; Levin, E.; Ballistreri, G.; Cacciola, S.O.; Schena, L. Elicitation of resistance responses in grapefruit and lemon fruits treated with a pomegranate peel extract. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 633–640.
  151. Dania, V.O.; Esiobu, M.G. Efficacy of plant-derived essential oils in post-harvest management of anthracnose disease on mango fruits. Makerere Univ. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2022, 11, 90–106.
  152. Najmi, Z.; Scalia, A.C.; De Giglio, E.; Cometa, S.; Cochis, A.; Colasanto, A.; Rimondini, L. Screening of Different Essential Oils Based on Their Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties to Preserve Red Fruits and Improve Their Shelf Life. Foods 2023, 12, 332.
  153. Bill, M.; Sivakumar, D.; Beukes, M.; Korsten, L. Expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in avocados fumigated with thyme oil vapors and control of anthracnose. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 938–943.
  154. Bill, M.; Korsten, L.; Remize, F.; Glowacz, M.; Sivakumar, D. Effect of thyme oil vapors exposure on phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and lipoxygenase (LOX) genes expression, and control of anthracnose in ‘Hass’ and ‘Ryan’ avocado fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 224, 232–237.
  155. Chen, C.; Cai, N.; Chen, J.; Wan, C. Clove essential oil as an alternative approach to control postharvest blue mold caused by Penicillium italicum in citrus fruit. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 197.
  156. Ranjbar, A.; Ramezanian, A.; Shekarforoush, S.; Niakousari, M.; Eshghi, S. Antifungal activity of thymol against the main fungi causing pomegranate fruit rot by suppressing the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 161, 113303.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback