Encyclopedia
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects:
Construction & Building Technology
Readiness for lean transformation is considered an essential requirement. Several studies have been conducted to identify lean readiness factors and develop assessment frameworks in other sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, pharmaceutical, emergency, higher education, etc., but none in construction. The work assesses the criteria and factors of lean readiness.
- lean
- readiness
- factors
- change
- culture
- construction
- sustainability
1. Introduction
Construction projects underpin economic development [1] and the progress of all nations. The construction industry adds significantly to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in a vast majority of countries with nearly 13% of the global GDP [2,3]. However, construction projects are seldom completed within the planned time and cost [4]. Projects linger with management change problems, time overruns, cost escalations, claims, and disputes [5] resulting in huge wastages of time, effort, and all resources. It has also been a concern that over the years construction productivity has remained flat as compared to the manufacturing industry, and this lag translates to about USD 1.6 trillion of loss every year [6]. Research studies have indicated that construction sector productivity can be boosted by 5 to 10 times in some areas by adopting a manufacturing-style production approach [6].
The lean production system originated from Toyota’s production system which, when implemented properly, has provided significant dividends to organizations. Despite the huge benefits of the lean production system, many organizations have been unsuccessful in their journey towards lean transformation and most organizations failed to reach the summit stage [7]. Successful lean transformation requires a transformation in the organizational culture [8]. If not addressed appropriately, the project of introducing lean culture into an organization may not only end up as a failure but may also significantly impair the prevalent practices and routine business processes of the organization as well [9].
Organizational lean readiness reflects upon the organization’s ability to undergo a smooth and sustainable lean transition and is developed by setting up practices, conditions, and resources facilitating lean change [10]. Studies have indicated lean implementation failure is also attributed to the fact that little attention is paid to organizational lean readiness [11,12]. To eliminate/reduce the failures in lean implementation, there needs to be an assessment of the organizational readiness levels before committing [13,14]. To ensure successful lean transformation, there needs to be an assessment of the organizational readiness levels [14]. This prior assessment of organizational readiness is intended to cut down the wasted effort and any waste during the process of lean transformation and will help ensure minimum disruption to the organizational process and business [8]. A planned organizational change would be more effective and efficient and would help organizations to measure the ability within the organization and aid in improving organizational capabilities [15].
2. Readiness Themes and Factors for Lean Transformation
To assess the works that were carried out on lean readiness, a systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out. The search query string—“Lean readiness” OR “readiness for lean” OR “readiness for lean implementation” OR “lean readiness assessment”—was set to include all journal research articles on lean readiness published in the English language in the Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases over the last decade. The search string resulted in 260 documents from Scopus and 119 documents from the WOS database. The duplicates in the databases were removed with the help of Zotero software. A team of three experts from academia and industry helped to identify and narrow down the literature relevant to the objectives and eliminate any bias for further review. Finally, 53 research articles were selected for analysis.
As may be seen from Figure 1 and Figure 2, out of the 53 articles, 27 of the studies (~51% of the studies) have focused on the manufacturing sector only. A total of 23 studies (43%) have been conducted in the service sectors. Again, as can be seen from Figure 2, these studies have been conducted in healthcare facilities [12,13,15,19,28,29,30,31], in emergency departments [16,18,32], higher education [23,33,34,35,36], and the construction industry [37,38,39,40]. The three service sectors—healthcare, higher education, and emergency—make up 70% of the studies within service sectors.
Figure 1. Distribution of articles by sectors.
Figure 2. Distribution of service sector articles.
The four studies conducted in the construction sector, the study objectives, and the limitations are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Studies on lean readiness in the construction sector.
| Study | Focus Area of the Study | Limitations of the Study |
|---|---|---|
| [37] | Lean Culture | Focuses only on cultural readiness; no holistic study on all the aspects of lean readiness |
| [38] | Lean readiness of Azerbaijan construction industry | Themes and factors such as those of the manufacturing sector studies adopted as they are; not customized to the construction industry; the study does not address the construction project lifecycle or processes |
| [39] | Construction Operations | Focuses only on the implementation of lean construction principles, but not readiness; lacks focus on softer attributes of lean readiness; outdated |
| [40] | Lean procurement | Focuses on the procurement process alone |
As can be seen from Figure 1 and Figure 2, and also Table 1, no comprehensive study has been carried out investigating the lean readiness factors for construction organizations.
This phase of review summarized “Organizational Readiness” themes and associated factors, which are largely applicable irrespective of the type/sector of the organization. These themes and factors represent the soft lean practices which apply to an organization in any sector/stream. These themes are discussed in the following section and factors are presented in Table 2. Twenty-eight lean readiness factors within the themes of leadership and top management commitment, organization Culture, employee/human Resources engagement, customer focus, communications and processes, and technology management were identified from the review of the fifty-three articles.
2.1. Top Management Commitment and Leadership
Any change management programme, including lean, needs the management’s unwavering support throughout the implementation phases as well as the leadership’s willingness to mentor and mitigate the risks of failure. Leadership should be able to create a vision that enables the employees to internalize the anticipated change and shift from current practices to best-in-class practices [23]. Top management must be prepared and show a willingness to be involved in resolving challenges that develop throughout the implementation, and leadership must completely enable the lean implementation teams by providing the necessary resources and infrastructure [19,41].
2.2. Organization Culture
Organizational culture can be defined as the shared assumptions regarding deep-rooted organization-wide values, norms, and beliefs [36], and the very definition of lean itself calls for a shift that relates to elements of cultural change. The culture of an organization greatly influences how well Lean transformations happen [42]. Organizational culture subtly directs the actions and behaviours of an organization’s members [43]. Organizations can accomplish strengthening the “soft aspects” required for firms to be more successful in their lean transformation by enhancing these positive behaviours and attributes.
2.3. Employee/Human Resources Engagement
The success of lean implementation depends on the level of awareness of employees [44] on the concepts of lean, lean tools and techniques, and the benefits which can be realized from the implementation. Hence, educating and involving every employee in and around lean principles, methodologies, and practices is crucial [19]. One of the crucial key criteria for effective adoption is lean training [45]. Management should align organizational objectives with employee performance KPIs, motivate with reward systems, [46] and should encourage to take full ownership and corrective actions to improve the processes [41].
2.4. Customer Focus/Customer Relationships
The capacity to define the customer is one of the crucial elements for successfully implementing lean practices in any firm [47]. A well-defined value for a given customer group prevents conflicting needs and objectives and reduces resistance to change [19]. Organizational processes must be structured with the needs of the customer at the centre, and all initiatives for improvement must systematically take customer feedback into account at every stage [23].
2.5. Technology/Process Management
Organizations need to set up processes that can analyze the waste across the value stream, cut down on the non-value-adding activities, and improve the quality and value [14]. Organizations must make sure that performance is tracked to decrease variability and find ways to improve. There must be procedures in place to evaluate the costs and benefits of major undertakings and manage risks [12,41].
2.6. Communication
Communication is one of the cornerstones of lean practices [48]. Lack of effective communication with the stakeholders of the lean initiative can lead to failure [49] and organizations need to establish clear and effective communication channels to ensure communication with all team members [50]. The organization should set up a communication process that encourages the horizontal and vertical exchange of information and also share lessons on failures and short-term wins [41].
3. Readiness Themes and Factors from Lean Construction Studies
Having identified the lean readiness studies in other sectors, it was important to review the lean construction literature to identify lean readiness factors spanning the construction project lifecycle. The Lean Project Delivery System (LPDS) proposed by Prof. Ballard [51], shown in Figure 3, was taken up as a starting point.
Figure 3. Lean Project Delivery System [51].
3.1. Engineering and Design
As can be seen from Figure 3, Project definition starts with the conceptual stage of engineering and design development and this process translated the project objectives to definitive outcomes. The study by [52] investigated the parameters that build lean ideology in the engineering and design management processes in construction projects. The factors identified by this study are selected for the study and listed in Table 3.
3.2. Project Planning, Monitoring, and Control
The Last Planner System® (LPS) has been one of the most commonly adopted production control methodologies based on lean philosophy. LPS was proposed as a novel solution by [53] to increase workflow predictability and increase work plan predictability by controlling the quality of assignments in weekly work plans. Studies by [54,55] identified parameters for planning and production control processes based on the LPS philosophy. The recently updated guideline [56], which was also considered, has touched upon the factors of work structuring and the visual management of plans in great detail.
3.3. Procurement and Inventory Management
Integrating lean practices with the supply chain, procurement, and material management, has been the interest of many studies [40,57,58,59]. These studies have advocated pull-based procurement, the use of automation and IT to minimise material requirements, standardized procurements, waste control, material reconciliation, housekeeping, and 5S methodologies in construction projects.
3.4. Contract Management
The other aspect of integrated lean project delivery is the aspect of work structuring, a process that designs and connects the project deliverables with suppliers, subcontractors, and other vendors. Towards this, studies [60,61,62] have advocated the practice of a relational contracting system that promotes balanced risk and opportunity sharing between the parties, transparency, and trust, and develops partnerships to build these in the supply chain contracts with all the vendors and contractors.
Twenty-five lean readiness factors were identified through a review of lean construction literature and are summarized in Table 3.
Table 2. Lean readiness themes and factors from the literature (organizational readiness themes).
| Theme | Lean Readiness Factors |
|---|---|
| Top Management Commitment and Leadership | |
| Organization Culture |
|
| Employee Engagement/HR | |
| Customer Focus |
|
| Communication |
|
| Technology and Process Management |
|
* This attribute was revised further based on expert opinion.
Table 3. Lean readiness themes and factors from lean construction studies (lean project delivery themes).
| Stage of Project Development | Lean Readiness Factors |
|---|---|
| Engineering and Design |
|
| Project Planning | |
| Project monitoring | |
| Procurement and Inventory Management |
|
| Contract Management |
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su15086433
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
