Fire and Smoke Detection: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Rimeh Daoudi
,
Aymen Mouelhi
,
Moez Bouchouicha
,
Eric Moreau
,
Mounir Sayadi

Wildfires are major natural disasters that can cause extensive damage to ecosystems and threaten human lives. It is an uncontrollable and destructive fire that rapidly spreads through vegetation, grasslands, or other flammable areas. Wildfires are typically triggered by a combination of factors, including the presence of abundant dry vegetation and favorable weather conditions like high temperatures, low humidity, and strong winds. The sources of ignition for wildfires are diverse and can range from natural causes like lightning strikes to human activities such as campfires, careless disposal of cigarettes, or even intentional acts of arson. Besides the destructive nature of wildfires, the smoke from wildfires can have severe human health risks and environmental consequences as it can contribute to air quality degradation, disrupt the balance of ecosystems, and even impact the behavior and survival of wildlife. Therefore, early fire and smoke detection are crucial.

  • wildfires
  • fire and smoke detection
  • computer vision
  • deep learning
  • database
  • image processing technique
  • artificial neural network

1. Introduction

Early fire and smoke detection are crucial; some recent methods and tools focus on smoke and fire detectors [1] due to their low cost. However, they have some limitations, such as poor performance in open and wide areas and the detection time, which is dependent on the distance between the detector and the smoke source [2]. Recent monitoring systems such as remote sensing technologies, satellite imagery, and ground-based sensors rely on artificial intelligence-based algorithms in detecting and monitoring the outbreak of fires and their spread. In those systems, vision software runs at its core and automatically detects the presence of an event.
In the last years, like other fields, computer vision-based fire and smoke detection methods have attracted the attention of researchers [3][4][5][6]. Compared to conventional methods [7][8][9][10][11], they have many advantages like the large area coverage, the real-time response, and the high accuracy.
Some of the existing approaches integrated various combinations of hand-crafted traditional techniques to detect smoke image features like shape, color, and texture [12][13][14]. At the same time, others exploit the moving nature of smoke to extract the motion characteristics [13][15][16] (motion value, direction, energy, convex hull), achieving good results considering some particular cases.
In recent years, deep learning-based algorithms, especially CNNs [17][18][19][20][21], have gained so much attention, and many researchers investigated those models and achieved good precision results. Hence, the use of those methods is still challenging since they rely on supervised learning and require huge databases for training, and their effectiveness depends on various factors, including the strong hardware systems for implementation and the quality and diversity of the dataset used for training. A database is one of the bases of a deep learning model, and the provided results largely depend on the comprehensiveness and the authenticity of training data. Industries and institutions involved in deep learning spend a lot of time and energy collecting datasets. The significant investment required to acquire these datasets adds value to deep learning training and underscores their importance. The availability of public smoke and fire databases with their ground truth labels is one of the biggest challenges related to deep learning models. In addition, smoke and wildfire images captured from fixed cameras, drones in motion, or other imaging devices are often affected by noise, artifacts, or other imperfections that can affect their interpretation and analysis. To address these challenges, Image processing techniques, such as noise reduction, image enhancement, and image restoration, are employed to improve the quality of acquired images, making them more suitable for interpretation.

2. Recent Methods Related to Fire and Smoke Detection

Computer vision and deep neural networks have emerged as powerful strategies for studying the behavior of fire and smoke. Numerous methods have been introduced in the literature to leverage these technologies. Kaabi et al. [22] introduced a method for smoke detection. First, a motion-based feature extraction with the GMM algorithm was employed; then, a trained DBN classifier based on the feature of smoke was used to detect the smoke region in videos. Xu et al. [23] proposed an end-to-end method for smoke detection based on a deep saliency network; the framework was used to extract the smoke saliency map via a pixel level and object level salient CNN. Yifan et al. [24] proposed a real-time detector network for fire and smoke based on a light YOLOv4. The model is based mainly on three modules: the MobileNetv3, the BiFPN, and a new feature extraction technique with depthwise separable convolution and attention block. The method attends good performance with a minimum of trainable parameters. Cao et al. [25] proposed a bidirectional LSTM network for forest fire and smoke detection in videos, and it consists of bidirectional learning of the discriminative spatiotemporal features. Ali Khan et al. [26] exploit the advantages of transfer learning to train the VGG19 model to localize wildfires; then, they build a network composed of unmanned aerial vehicles communicated to an assistance center to simplify and increase the data transmission process. Frizzi et al. [27] proposed a new CNN architecture for fire and smoke segmentation and classification. The network is composed of coding and decoding paths and achieves better accuracy compared to similar methods with low false positives (clouds, haze) and in optimal segmentation time. Aymen et al. [28] integrate the non-linear adaptive level set method with an artificial neural network model to track the forest fire regions in wildfire videos; the method consists of estimating and localizing the possible fire contours by analyzing the chromatic and statistical features with the linear discriminant analysis combined with an artificial neural network. Then, a level-set algorithm was applied to refine the segmentation results. The method gives good results in terms of speed and accuracy. An interesting approach proposed by [29] concentrates and studies the architecture and the training of networks; it combines the self-attention mechanism with a multi-scale feature connection for real-time fire and smoke detection. The authors first fused the feature maps of the network into a radial connection; then, they applied a permutation attention mechanism to gather the relevant information, and designed a feature fusion block to increase the detection efficiency. The method gives good results compared to standard proposed methods.
Recent technologies based on advanced artificial neural network architecture achieve good results, but they still have limitations, especially when trying to implement them for daily use because of the need for huge databases for training and the strong/expensive computation resources. From this, many methods attempt to detect fire and smoke by building a pipeline integrating the image processing techniques and by exploiting the smoke textural features (Table 1). Ref. [30] built a statistical model combined with an optical flow algorithm for real-time fire and smoke detection. The method first extracts the smoke and fire-like regions with frame differential steps, a color model of fire and smoke, and a foreground accumulation technique. A motion feature discriminating model with the optical flow was applied to the first resulting image to extract the final fire and smoke regions. In [31], the fire presence decision in video frames is reached by analyzing the color variations and periodic behavior of the flame with the temporal and spatial wavelet transform algorithm. Ref. [32] proposed a fire detection system consisting of modeling the color information in the CIE L*a*b color space and detecting the motion of fire pixels with a background subtraction technique.
Table 1. Overview of main methods and findings in the smoke detection literature.
  Color Space Features Method Accuracy (%)
Hashemzadeh [7] RGB Motion CNN
SVM		 97.6
Pundir [33] RGB Motion
Texture
Color		 Deep CNN 97.4
Yin [34] RGB Motion CNN 97.0
Toreyin [35] YUV Motion
Energy
Disorder		 Wavelet
transform		 -

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/electronics12183888

References

  1. Garcia-Jimenez, S.; Jurio, A.; Pagola, M.; De Miguel, L.; Barrenechea, E.; Bustince, H. Forest fire detection: A fuzzy system approach based on overlap indices. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 2, 834–842.
  2. Tian, H.; Li, W.; Wang, L.; Ogunbona, P. Smoke detection in video: An image separation approach. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2014, 106, 192–209.
  3. Sun, Y.; Feng, J. Fire and smoke precise detection method based on the attention mechanism and anchor-free mechanism. Complex Intell. Syst. 2023, 1–14.
  4. Wang, X.; Li, M.; Gao, M.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Kou, L. Early smoke and flame detection based on transformer. J. Saf. Sci. Resil. 2023, 4, 294–304.
  5. Sathishkumar, V.E.; Cho, J.; Subramanian, M.; Sai Naren, O. Forest fire and smoke detection using deep learning-based learning without forgetting. Fire Ecol. 2023, 19, 9.
  6. Lou, L.; Chen, F.; Cheng, P.; Huang, Y. Smoke root detection from video sequences based on multi-feature fusion. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 1841–1856.
  7. Hashemzadeh, M.; Zademehdi, A. Fire detection for video surveillance applications using ICA K-medoids-based color model and efficient spatio-temporal visual features. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019, 130, 60–78.
  8. Zhong, Z.; Wang, M.; Shi, Y.; Gao, W. A convolutional neural network-based flame detection method in video sequence. Signal Image Video Process. 2018, 12, 1619–1627.
  9. Khatami, A.; Mirghasemi, S.; Khosravi, A.; Lim, C.P.; Nahavandi, S. A new PSO-based approach to fire flame detection using K-medoids clustering. Expert Syst. Appl. Vol. 2017, 68, 69–80.
  10. Sousa, M.J.; Moutinho, A.; Almeida, M. Wildfire detection using transfer learning on augmented datasets. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 142, 112975.
  11. Zhao, Y.; Tang, G.; Xu, M. Hierarchical detection of wildfire flame video from pixel level to semantic level. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 2, 4097–4104.
  12. Filonenko, A.; Hernández, D.C.; Jo, K. Fast smoke detection for video surveillance using CUDA. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2018, 14, 725–733.
  13. Barmpoutis, P.; Dimitropoulos, K.; Grammalidis, N. Smoke detection using spatio-temporal analysis, motion modeling and dynamic texture recognition. In Proceedings of the 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–5 September 2014; pp. 1078–1082.
  14. Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Qian, Z. Smoke-detection framework for high-definition video using fused spatial- and frequency-domain features. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 89687–89701.
  15. Wang, Y.; Wu, A.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, M.; Li, W.; Dong, N. Fire smoke detection based on texture features and optical flow vector of contour. In Proceedings of the 2016 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, WCICA, Guilin, China, 12–15 June 2016; pp. 2879–2883.
  16. Appana, D.K.; Islam, R.; Khan, S.A.; Kim, J.-M. A video-based smoke detection using smoke flow pattern and spatial–temporal energy analyses for alarm systems. Inf. Sci. 2017, 418–419, 91–101.
  17. Novac, I.; Geipel, K.R.; Gil, J.E.D.; Paula, L.G.D.; Hyttel, K.; Chrysostomou, D. A Framework for Wildfire Inspection Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Honolulu, HI, USA, 12–15 January 2020; pp. 867–872.
  18. He, L.; Gong, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Li, F. Efficient attention based deep fusion CNN for smoke detection in fog environment. Neurocomputing 2021, 434, 224–238.
  19. Bouguettaya, A.; Zarzour, H.; Taberkit, A.M.; Kechida, A. A Review on Early Wildfire Detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Deep Learning-Based Computer Vision Algorithms. Signal Process. 2022, 190, 108309.
  20. Gagliardi, A.; de Gioia, F.; Saponara, S. A real-time video smoke detection algorithm based on Kalman filter and CNN. J. Real-Time Image Process. 2021, 18, 2085–2095.
  21. Lu, K.; Xu, R.; Li, J.; Lv, Y.; Lin, H.; Liu, Y. A Vision-Based Detection and Spatial Localization Scheme for Forest Fire Inspection from UAV. Forests 2022, 13, 383.
  22. Kaabi, R.; Bouchouicha, M.; Mouelhi, A.; Sayadi, M.; Moreau, E. An Efficient Smoke Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Belief Network Classifier Using Energy and Intensity Features. Electronics 2020, 9, 1390–1411.
  23. Xu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, G.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Y.; Wang, J. Video smoke detection based on deep saliency network. Fire Saf. J. 2019, 105, 277–285.
  24. Wang, Y.H.; Hua, C.; Ding, W.; Wu, R. Real-time detection of flame and smoke using an improved YOLOv4 network. SIViP 2022, 16, 1109–1116.
  25. Cao, Y.; Yang, F.; Tang, Q.; Lu, X. An Attention Enhanced Bidirectional LSTM for Early Forest Fire Smoke Recognition. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 154732–154742.
  26. Khan, A.; Hassan, B.; Khan, S.; Ahmed, R.; Abuassba, A. Deep Fire: A Novel Dataset and Deep Transfer Learning Benchmark for Forest Fire Detection. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 5358359.
  27. Frizzi, S.; Bouchouicha, M.; Ginoux, J.; Moreau, E.; Sayadi, M. Convolutional neural network for smoke and fire semantic segmentation. IET Image Process. 2021, 15, 634–647.
  28. Mouelhi, A.; Bouchouicha, M.; Sayadi, M.; Moreau, E. A Neural Adaptive Level Set Method for Wildland Forest Fire Tracking. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. Indersci. 2021, 67, 289–302.
  29. Jin, C.; Zheng, A.; Wu, Z.; Tong, C. Real-Time Fire Smoke Detection Method Combining a Self-Attention Mechanism and Radial Multi-Scale Feature Connection. Sensors 2023, 6, 3358.
  30. Yu, C.; Mei, Z.; Zhang, X. A real-time video fire flame and smoke detection algorithm. Procedia Eng. 2013, 62, 891–898.
  31. Yigithan, D.; Behçet, T.; Gudukbay, U.; Cetin, A. Real-Time Fire and Flame Detection in Video, 1988 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP-88 2005, 2, 669–673.
  32. Turgay, C. Fast and Efficient Method for Fire Detection Using Image Processing. ETRI J. 2010, 32, 881–890.
  33. Pundir, A.S.; Raman, B. Dual Deep Learning Model for Image Based Smoke Detection. Fire Technol. 2019, 55, 2419–2442.
  34. Yin, Z.; Wan, B.; Yuan, F.; Xia, X.; Shi, J. A Deep Normalization and Convolutional Neural Network for Image Smoke Detection. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 18429–18438.
  35. Toreyin, B.U.; Dedeoglu, Y.; Cetin, A.E. Contour Based Smoke Detection in Video Using Wavelets. In Proceedings of the 14th European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2006, Florence, Italy, 4–8 September 2006; pp. 1–5.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback