Expression and Regulation of INPP5D in  Alzheimer’s Disease: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Edward O. Olufunmilayo
,
R. M. Damian Holsinger

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, accounting for approximately 38.5 million cases of all-cause dementia. Microglial cells, the innate immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), have long been established as guardians of the brain by providing neuroprotection and maintaining cellular homeostasis. A protein with a myriad of effects on various important signaling pathways that is expressed in microglia is the Src Homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing Inositol 5′ Phosphatase 1 (SHIP1) protein. Encoded by the INPP5D (Inositol Polyphosphate-5-Phosphatase D) gene, SHIP1 has diminutive effects on most microglia signaling processes. Polymorphisms of the INPP5D gene have been found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of AD.

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • CNS
  • microglia
  • INPP5D
  • phosphatase domain
  • expression

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a common progressive neurodegenerative disease typically affecting individuals over the age of 65. It accounts for approximately 70% of all-cause dementia. Recent statistics have revealed that approximately 55 million individuals are living with dementia worldwide [1]. Cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms cause deterioration in quality of life and the need for 24-hour care, culminating in serious personal impact on patients and caregivers. Dementia, therefore, is an enormous global health burden, and the development of effective therapies is critical to effectively managing AD.
Genetic predisposition is an important AD risk determinant, with heritability estimates of 60–80% [2]. Microglia are the predominant immune cells in the brain, and genes exclusively or highly expressed in microglia, such as TREM2, CD33, PLCG2, ABI3 [3] and INPP5D [4], have been found to exert various influences on the development of AD.
Central nervous system (CNS)-resident microglia provide innate immune defense against infection and trauma and maintain tissue homeostasis by performing synaptic pruning and clearing apoptotic cells and cellular debris. The blood–brain barrier prevents the adaptive immune system from playing a significant role in the CNS by excluding peripheral adaptive immune cells from the brain, although new evidence suggests that antigens and antigen-presenting cells originating from the CNS have been found in the peripheral lymphatic system and may stimulate adaptive and humoral immune reactions [5]. Once activated from their homeostatic or quiescent state, microglia assume a ramified morphology and efficiently clear various cellular and acellular material that has been marked for disposal. Such materials are generally produced by a variety of insults such as acute damage caused by trauma, or ongoing damage, such as that characteristic of chronic neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. In AD, these damage-related materials and signals arise from plaques, fibrils and insoluble aggregates of amyloid-β (Aβ), damaged myelin, extracellular matrix, and stressed as well as degenerating neurons [6].
As AD develops, microglia lose their innate function and form clusters surrounding amyloid plaques and other damage signals [7]. Either through local proliferation or migration, microglia alter their morphology to become more amoeboid as they transform into a reactive state and prime their protein-synthesizing machinery to express various proteins needed to mount an immune response and, importantly, promote phagocytosis [7].
In 1994, Saxton and colleagues [8] reported that a 145 kDa protein became phosphorylated and associated with the adaptor protein Shc1 following B-cell or cytokine receptor stimulation. Shortly thereafter, the 145 kDa protein was identified by a number of research groups as Src Homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing Inositol 5′ Phosphatase (SHIP) [9][10][11], a protein encoded by the gene INPP5D (a member of the inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase) at the locus 2q37.1. Polymorphisms of INPP5D have been associated with higher risk of late-onset AD (LOAD) [4]. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs35349669 and rs10933431 in the INPP5D gene were significantly associated with increased AD risk [12]. INPP5D is associated with another major AD risk gene—TREM2 (Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 2). It inhibits TREM2 signaling through its interactions with DAP12 (DNAX-activating protein of 12 kDa), an adaptor protein that is important for TREM2 signaling and function [13]. Thus, SHIP1 potentially plays important roles in the pathophysiology associated with Alzheimer’s disease, and therefore, numerous small-molecule inhibitors of SHIP1 protein are currently being studied as possible immune-based therapies for AD.

2. Role of INPP5D in AD

INPP5D is a gene that is advancing to the forefront of genetics research in AD as a result of one of its SNPs, rs35349669, being associated as a common variant of the disease, accounting for 3.8% of all genetic risk for AD [14].
INPP5D, expressed in the brain, mostly in microglia, typically includes a 27-exon gene that encodes several isoforms. The full-length 27-exon isoform encodes an amino-terminal SH2 domain followed by a phosphatase domain, while the transcription of truncated isoforms lacking the SH2 domain originates from internal transcription start sites (TSS) [12].
The minor intron 10 allele of rs35349669 is associated with increased risk of AD, while the minor allele of rs10933431 located in intron 2 is associated with decreased AD risk [4][15]. According to Zajac et al. [12], isoforms of INPP5D associated with TSSs located in exon 1 and intron 14 are markedly increased in individuals with high AD neuropathology. In addition, expression of a novel variant (referred to as the D47 variant) that lacks a 47 bp segment from exon 12 was also increased in AD brains, resulting in ~13% of total INPP5D expression, and was found to undergo nonsense-mediated decay [12]. The missing 47 base pairs results in a frameshift and a consequent introduction of a premature termination codon (PTC), with the resulting protein being devoid of a phosphatase domain. The rs35349669 SNP correlates with an allele-specific expression of full-length INPP5D [12].
The identified TSS of INPP5D includes TSS-A in the SH2 domain, and TSS-B and TSS-C in the phosphatase domain, all of which result in the production of different SHIP1 isoforms. TSS-A is located in exon 1 and generates isoforms 201, 204 and 205, whilst TSS-B originates in exon 11, producing isoform 202, and TSS-C is located in intron 14 and generates isoform 213. They also showed that isoforms originating from TSS-A and TSS-C are upregulated in the AD brain compared to the isoform produced by TSS-B. They concluded that individuals with AD may have an altered transcription factor profile or open chromatin sites that influence access to the TSS of the INPP5D gene, which in turn promotes transcription of various SHIP1 isoforms, leading to the propagation of AD pathology [12]. The Ikaros family of genes encodes for five zinc-finger proteins—Ikaros (IKZF1), Helios (IKZF2), Aiolos (IKZF3), Eos (IKZF4) and Pegasus (IKZF5)—that act as transcription factors, exerting critical regulatory roles during the development and function of various immune cells [16][17]. Ikaros exerts a crucial regulatory role in B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, as studies have found that disruption of Ikaros in the chicken B cell line DT40 results in a diminution of BCR signaling, with reduced PLCγ2 phosphorylation and impaired intracellular calcium mobilization and signaling [18][19]. Other studies have revealed that Helios exerts a directly opposite effect as its knockout resulted in elevated BCR signaling [20]. Both Ikaros and Helios bind similar DNA sequences and chromatin remodeling complexes in the upstream regulatory region of the INPP5D gene to exert their effects as transcription factors [21][22].
Studies by Tsai and colleagues [23] revealed significantly elevated INPP5D expression in human AD microglial cells, and demonstrated a direct correlation between increased INPP5D expression and amyloid deposition in specific brain regions, including the inferior frontal, parahippocampal and superior temporal gyri, as well as in the frontal pole, although they did not delve into mechanisms driving specific INPP5D gene expression. There have been attempts to explain the increased expression of INPP5D in AD, where it has been proposed to be related to neuroinflammation and amyloid-plaque-associated increase in the expression of the transcription factor PU.1, which has been strongly associated in AD genetics. PU1 has been shown to bind to and upregulate INPP5D expression as it does other AD-related genes including TYROBP, MS4As, TREM2, and CD33 [24]. However, more studies are required to characterize the mechanisms that underpin the increase in INPP5D expression in AD, how this might be mitigated, and if such manipulations may be of any tenable therapeutic benefits.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/genes14101845

References

  1. WHO. Dementia-Social and Economic Impact. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia (accessed on 18 September 2023).
  2. Tanzi, R.E. The genetics of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a006296.
  3. Wightman, D.P.; Jansen, I.E.; Savage, J.E.; Shadrin, A.A.; Bahrami, S.; Holland, D.; Rongve, A.; Borte, S.; Winsvold, B.S.; Drange, O.K.; et al. A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 1276–1282.
  4. Lambert, J.C.; Ibrahim-Verbaas, C.A.; Harold, D.; Naj, A.C.; Sims, R.; Bellenguez, C.; DeStafano, A.L.; Bis, J.C.; Beecham, G.W.; Grenier-Boley, B.; et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1452–1458.
  5. Engelhardt, B.; Vajkoczy, P.; Weller, R.O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 123–131.
  6. Olufunmilayo, E.O.; Holsinger, R.M.D. Variant TREM2 Signaling in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167470.
  7. Keren-Shaul, H.; Spinrad, A.; Weiner, A.; Matcovitch-Natan, O.; Dvir-Szternfeld, R.; Ulland, T.K.; David, E.; Baruch, K.; Lara-Astaiso, D.; Toth, B.; et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2017, 169, 1276–1290.e17.
  8. Saxton, T.M.; van Oostveen, I.; Bowtell, D.; Aebersold, R.; Gold, M.R. B cell antigen receptor cross-linking induces phosphorylation of the p21ras oncoprotein activators SHC and mSOS1 as well as assembly of complexes containing SHC, GRB-2, mSOS1, and a 145-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein. J. Immunol. 1994, 153, 623–636.
  9. Chacko, G.W.; Tridandapani, S.; Damen, J.E.; Liu, L.; Krystal, G.; Coggeshall, K.M. Negative signaling in B lymphocytes induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the 145-kDa inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, SHIP. J. Immunol. 1996, 157, 2234–2238.
  10. Damen, J.E.; Liu, L.; Rosten, P.; Humphries, R.K.; Jefferson, A.B.; Majerus, P.W.; Krystal, G. The 145-kDa protein induced to associate with Shc by multiple cytokines is an inositol tetraphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate 5-phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1689–1693.
  11. Ware, M.D.; Rosten, P.; Damen, J.E.; Liu, L.; Humphries, R.K.; Krystal, G. Cloning and characterization of human SHIP, the 145-kD inositol 5-phosphatase that associates with SHC after cytokine stimulation. Blood 1996, 88, 2833–2840.
  12. Zajac, D.J.; Simpson, J.; Zhang, E.; Parikh, I.; Estus, S. Expression of INPP5D Isoforms in Human Brain: Impact of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropathology and Genetics. Genes 2023, 14, 763.
  13. Peng, Q.; Malhotra, S.; Torchia, J.A.; Kerr, W.G.; Coggeshall, K.M.; Humphrey, M.B. TREM2- and DAP12-dependent activation of PI3K requires DAP10 and is inhibited by SHIP1. Sci. Signal 2010, 3, ra38.
  14. Van Cauwenberghe, C.; Van Broeckhoven, C.; Sleegers, K. The genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease: Clinical implications and perspectives. Genet. Med. 2016, 18, 421–430.
  15. Jansen, I.E.; Savage, J.E.; Watanabe, K.; Bryois, J.; Williams, D.M.; Steinberg, S.; Sealock, J.; Karlsson, I.K.; Hagg, S.; Athanasiu, L.; et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 404–413.
  16. Thompson, E.C.; Cobb, B.S.; Sabbattini, P.; Meixlsperger, S.; Parelho, V.; Liberg, D.; Taylor, B.; Dillon, N.; Georgopoulos, K.; Jumaa, H.; et al. Ikaros DNA-binding proteins as integral components of B cell developmental-stage-specific regulatory circuits. Immunity 2007, 26, 335–344.
  17. Read, K.A.; Jones, D.M.; Freud, A.G.; Oestreich, K.J. Established and emergent roles for Ikaros transcription factors in lymphoid cell development and function. Immunol. Rev. 2021, 300, 82–99.
  18. Nera, K.P.; Alinikula, J.; Terho, P.; Narvi, E.; Tornquist, K.; Kurosaki, T.; Buerstedde, J.M.; Lassila, O. Ikaros has a crucial role in regulation of B cell receptor signaling. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 516–525.
  19. Dhanyamraju, P.K.; Iyer, S.; Smink, G.; Bamme, Y.; Bhadauria, P.; Payne, J.L.; Dovat, E.; Klink, M.; Ding, Y. Transcriptional Regulation of Genes by Ikaros Tumor Suppressor in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1377.
  20. Alinikula, J.; Kohonen, P.; Nera, K.P.; Lassila, O. Concerted action of Helios and Ikaros controls the expression of the inositol 5-phosphatase SHIP. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 2599–2607.
  21. Hahm, K.; Cobb, B.S.; McCarty, A.S.; Brown, K.E.; Klug, C.A.; Lee, R.; Akashi, K.; Weissman, I.L.; Fisher, A.G.; Smale, S.T. Helios, a T cell-restricted Ikaros family member that quantitatively associates with Ikaros at centromeric heterochromatin. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 782–796.
  22. Xia, R.; Cheng, Y.; Han, X.; Wei, Y.; Wei, X. Ikaros Proteins in Tumor: Current Perspectives and New Developments. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 788440.
  23. Tsai, A.P.; Lin, P.B.; Dong, C.; Moutinho, M.; Casali, B.T.; Liu, Y.; Lamb, B.T.; Landreth, G.E.; Oblak, A.L.; Nho, K. INPP5D expression is associated with risk for Alzheimer’s disease and induced by plaque-associated microglia. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 153, 105303.
  24. Huang, K.L.; Marcora, E.; Pimenova, A.A.; Di Narzo, A.F.; Kapoor, M.; Jin, S.C.; Harari, O.; Bertelsen, S.; Fairfax, B.P.; Czajkowski, J.; et al. A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1052–1061.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback