Tourism for persons with disabilities (PwD) is a research field that began to concern researchers in the late 1980s when it was realized that although these people have equal rights to travel, they have to face a series of obstacles. By definition, social tourism refers to people for whom travel is a challenging experience. The barriers and constraints faced by the elderly and PwD during their participation in tourism have been thoroughly studied. Both the accessible tourism market and cross-border cooperation are directly linked to the sustainability of tourism.
1. Tourism and Persons with Disabilities
The market of persons with disabilities (PwD) and those with access needs is still underserved by the tourism industry, even though this market comprises about 10% of the world’s population. In several countries of the Western world this percentage reaches 15–20%, with a significant contribution of the aging population
[1]. It is a fact that 35% of people over the age of 65 have some kind of disability
[2]. In order for this market to be developed and meet this significant demand, barriers to participation must be removed
[3]. The lack of accessibility is one of the main deterrents for these people to participate in tourism activities
[4][5][6][7][8], as well as the lack of staff training in tourism businesses
[7][8][9][10][11][12]. These are macro-systemic environmental factors of the destination that lie outside the sphere of influence of PwD
[8].
The literature in recent years has increasingly focused attention on the supply side, with accessible tourism strongly linked to social tourism
[13]. Social tourism is a policy that favors the inclusion of people with disabilities in tourism in a sustainable way
[14], as by definition social tourism seeks to include people who would otherwise not have the opportunity to participate in tourism
[15]. Social tourism is more socially oriented and not so economically; therefore, it has the potential to contribute to tourist destinations based on sustainability criteria. Given the potential of accessible tourism, the competitiveness of sustainable tourism development is related to innovations in the provision of tourism services for the elderly and PwD, while at the same time the challenges of social tourism should be addressed
[16].
The realization of the need to include all people in the built environment led to Universal Design which from a broader perspective refers to ‘a process that enables and empowers a diverse population by improving human performance, health and wellness, and social participation’
[17]. In particular, tourism businesses should include all the necessary equipment to ensure that all visitors can experience unhindered the services they provide
[18]. To assess the accessibility of buildings, some basic characteristics are used, such as parking areas, building entrances, and toilets
[19]. More specifically in the hotel sector, some important accessibility features can be the following: wheelchair free movement, grab bars in the toilets, lower sinks, higher level toilets, cords for emergency use, visual aids (Braille, tactile signs, etc.), and audio guidance
[20]. Moreover, the availability of accessible rooms is also an important accessibility factor for accommodation businesses
[19].
At this point, it should be pointed out that the accessibility features of buildings in many cases facilitate their use not only by PwD but by all users. For example, when the entrance to a public building—such as a hotel—does not have height differences and uses a photocell to automatically open the door, then not only PwD are facilitated, but also customers carrying a suitcase, or a child’s stroller, etc. This is the World Health Organization’s
[21] approach to accessibility, which actually serves a wide range of people, beyond PwD. This gives a competitive advantage to tourism businesses, as accessibility is an important quality factor of the tourist experience.
Apart from the physical accessibility of the buildings, however, the attitude of the staff of the businesses towards PwD is also found to be important as it is often an obstacle for their participation in tourism
[7][9][10][11]. The training of tourism business staff is considered an important factor in properly serving people with disabilities
[12][22], while it is shown that staff attitudes can be significantly improved by attending appropriate training programs
[17]. The goal of training should be to acquire appropriate skills so that employees are able to offer their services to each customer, meeting their different and varied needs
[14]. Eliminating discrimination should be the ultimate goal, through the adoption of principles that will actually change the business culture
[23].
2. Cross-Border Cooperation and Tourism
Border regions are of special interest, not only at a national level but also in relation to cooperation between populations
[19]. Thus, in recent years the issue of cross-border cooperation has been the subject of study both at the European Union level
[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and internationally, as in the case of the US–Mexico border
[31][32] and Asia
[33]. Borders are no longer considered as barriers to communication and relations between populations on either side of the border line, but as an opportunity for cooperation. The importance of establishing relationships with the other side of the border is of particular relevance for border areas, which are disadvantaged, compared to the hinterland
[34], as borders cause processes of marginalization
[35]. Cross-border flows, however, create a special space with significant growth potential
[36], while the geopolitical importance often leads to dynamic tourist interest
[37].
Cross-border cooperation, especially in the case of tourism, is closely related to the sustainable tourism development of these areas
[38][39][40]. Moreover, this kind of cooperation can strengthen international relations between regions
[41]. At the level of bilateral (or even tripartite in some cases) relations, a common type of cooperation between cross-border areas is that of cooperative tourism marketing that leads to mutual benefits for the countries involved
[38][41][42]. Although this is a relatively recent field of research, the existing literature notes the benefits of such collaboration. Kozak and Buhalis
[37] refer to a joint strategy of promoting cross-border destinations integrated into packages, especially for tourists from distant regions, which strengthens the competitiveness of the countries involved. Thus, the creation of clusters of similar tourism products in neighboring countries can offer specific types of tourism that can favor the participating countries in the international competitive environment
[43].
Tosun et al.
[38], studying the case of cooperation between Greece and the neighboring country of Turkey, found that cooperative tourism marketing strategies can lead to more efficient and effective marketing, but also ensure a stable and safe environment for visitors. Their study showed that significant challenges are the establishment of a joint tourism organization, the adequacy of financial resources, and the involvement of businesses and non-governmental organizations from both sides of the border.
Studying the case of cross-border cooperation between the USA and Canada in three international parks based on sustainable tourism development, Timothy
[40] highlights the importance of bilateral treaties and less formal local cooperation in creating the foundations for sustainable management of cross-border tourism resources.
An interesting approach is that of Kirillova et al.
[44], who highlight that in practice cooperation between tourism destinations is difficult, mainly due to the intense competition that exists between them. Thus, they use the “coopetition” approach for the relationships that can develop between cross-border destinations. According to this approach, the main “coopetitive” force is the resource heterogeneity between destinations, which is different but complementary. Their study, concerning the Greater Bay Area, reveals that a successful “coopetitive” brand should not downplay the unique characteristics of the destinations but focus on qualities that are common to both. Such a “coopetitive” approach aims to integrate the different destinations into a regional brand while allowing them to maintain their competitive positions in the region.
Both the accessible tourism market and cross-border cooperation are directly linked to the sustainability of tourism. In an intensely competitive international environment, differentiation through partnerships and specifically through collaborative tourism marketing is an important opportunity for cross-border regions. This becomes even more important as marketing strategies increasingly focus on niche markets
[45] such as the market of accessible tourism
[23].
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/su151914093