Transformation refers to the process by which competent bacteria take up DNA from outside. Unlike conjugation, transformation does not require physical contact between the donor and recipient cells, and free DNA released by cell lysis can serve as the donor for transformation
[37][51
Existing studies on transformation not only discuss the changes of ARGs vectors (plasmids, chromosomes, etc.) and recipient bacteria in soil microcosms, EPS, sediments, or other media but also include studies on the addition of single components to simulate soil conditions
[70][71][72][76][95,96,97,101]. Relevant research (
Table 2) has shown that plasmids
[69][12] and chromosomes
[73][98] adsorbed by soil components can still participate in transformation; Chamier et al.
[74][99] found that the plasmid adsorbed on sand transformed significantly less efficiently than the plasmid in solution; but Dong et al.
[76][101] considered that sediment-adsorbed plasmids had higher transformation efficiency than episomal plasmids. Montmorillonite at low concentrations (0–0.025 g/L)
[71][96] and goethite at high concentrations (10 g/L)
[70][95] promote transformation, while high concentrations of kaolinite (10 g/L), montmorillonite (0.025–2 g/L and 10 g/L), and biochar (2, 4, and 8 g/L) inhibit it
[70][71][72][95,96,97].
The research on conjugation (
Table 3) showed that birnessite and low concentrations of goethite (0–0.5 g/L) promoted conjugation; the effects of kaolinite and montmorillonite were irregular; goethite at high concentration (5 g/L) inhibited conjugative transfer
[77][13]. Liu et al.
[78][102] found that biochar can weaken the promoting effect of heavy metals on conjugation, while Zheng et al.
[79][103] reported that pyroligneous acid and its three fractions at different temperatures had inhibitory effects on conjugative transfer. Some studies illustrated the mechanisms of soil components affecting the process of conjugation by detecting the expression of related genes
[77][78][80][13,102,104], but most of them are speculation based on transcriptome results, and the understanding of related pathways and mechanisms is still unclear, which is worth exploring in depth.
Table 3. Research on the effects of soil components on conjugation of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).
2.2. Influence Mechanisms of Soil Components on HGT of ARGs
Although transformation, conjugation, and transduction are three independent HGT mechanisms, there are some commonalities between them when soil components are present. Soil components mostly affect the HGT process of ARGs through similar pathways: from the perspective of intracellular changes and responses, including regulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, SOS response, and the expression levels of related genes, etc.
[77][80][83][13,104,107]; from the point of view of intercellular contact and communication, it includes the influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)
[80][104] and quorum sensing
[84][85][108,109], etc.; in addition, it also includes affecting the activity of plasmids or bacterial concentration
[86][87][88][110,111,112].
2.2.1. Intracellular Changes and Responses
Intracellular ROS Production
ROS are generated via successive single-electron reductions, including superoxide (O
2·
−), hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2), and hydroxyl radical (OH·)
[89][113]. Intracellular ROS generation can cause oxidative stress, which affects a series of macromolecules of bacteria (DNA, lipids, and proteins)
[90][114]. Intracellular ROS can be scavenged by the antioxidant system, which is an intracellular defense mechanism
[91][115]. Antioxidant enzymes (such as catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)) catalyze the conversion and detoxification of corresponding oxidative groups and, finally, relieve oxidative stress
[92][116]. Moderately generated ROS after treatment with soil components may stimulate a series of protective responses that favor the promotion of HGT. Birnessite can initiate the formation of intracellular ROS and induce oxidative stress, which is one of the important mechanisms for birnessite-promoting ARGs conjugation
[77][13]. However, excessive production of intracellular ROS will exceed the capacity of antioxidant enzymes, resulting in severe cellular damage or death of cells, ultimately inhibiting conjugation
[93][117].
SOS Response
SOS response is a global regulatory response to protect cells from severe DNA damage by ROS
[94][118], which has been shown to promote the HGT of ARGs
[83][107]. However, there are few studies on the induction of bacterial SOS responses by soil. It is speculated that the natural components in soil have limited influence on the bacteria, while the nanoscale components or other pollutants in soil may cause the excessive accumulation of ROS and induce the SOS response. For example, high concentration of nano-CeO
2 (50 mg/L) caused the up-regulation of both SOS response activation genes (
lexA,
recA) and DNA repair genes (
umuC,
umuD,
uvrA,
uvrB)
[80][104], which promoted the conjugative transfer of ARGs.
Cell Membrane Permeability
Cell membrane permeability changes with the stimulation of environmental stress, and such changes are potentially related to the spread of genetic materials
[72][97]. The increase in cell membrane permeability, which can be divided into active improvement and passive damage, may contribute to the transfer of ARGs to a certain extent
[39][78][53,102].
On the one hand, under the action of soil components, bacteria can autonomously up-regulate the related gene expression of membrane proteins, that is, active improvement. For example, Wu et al.
[77][13] found that birnessite up-regulated the expression level of several outer membrane protein genes (
ompA,
ompF,
ompC), thus promoting the conjugative transfer of ARGs. On the other hand, bacteria may be physically damaged by external perturbations, resulting in the formation of pores on the cell membrane (e.g., collisions with bacteria during material mixing
[95][96][119,120]); it is also possible that some soil components, especially nanoscale soil components (e.g., high-temperature black carbon), allow the excessive production of intracellular ROS and then damage the integrity of cell membranes; another possibility shows that the high concentration of heavy metals released from the process of interaction between soil components and bacteria indirectly promotes lipid peroxidation and induces cell membrane damage
[97][98][121,122]; all of the above are passive damage. Both goethite
[70][95] and montmorillonite
[71][96] were found to promote the transformation of ARGs by causing cell membrane damage.
When the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane is excessively damaged, the bacteria will die, which inhibits the conjugation of ARGs. But the ARGs released from damaged or dead bacteria are free from the soil and have the opportunity to become donors of transformation. Ma et al.
[99][123] and Ouyang et al.
[100][124] reported that soil minerals, such as kaolinite, goethite, and hematite, can induce bacterial death by disrupting cell membranes. In addition, bacteria can also initiate protective responses by reducing cell membrane permeability, thereby reducing the uptake of toxic substances
[101][102][125,126], while also hindering the occurrence of HGT. For example, biochar dissolutions caused a decrease in cell membrane permeability, thus inhibiting the transformation of ARGs
[72][97].
ATP Synthesis Capacity
The construction of conjugative transfer apparatus, replication of plasmids, and transport across cell membranes all depend on adenosine triphosphate (ATP)
[103][127]. Soil components can affect the frequency of conjugation and transformation by regulating ATP synthesis. For example, CeO
2 caused an insufficient ATP supply, which in turn inhibited the process of conjugation of ARGs
[80][104].
Conjugation Activity of Intracellular Plasmids
The conjugation of plasmids requires the participation of a series of conjugation-related genes and regulatory genes, such as global regulatory genes (
korA,
korB, etc.), DNA transfer and replication (DTR) system genes (
trfAp, etc.), and MPF system genes (
trbBp, etc.)
[82][106]. Among them, the MPF system is crucial for the formation of fimbriae
[104][128]. In Gram-negative bacteria, sexual fimbriae act as channels for DNA conjugative transfer, and both their length and flexibility affect the efficiency of bacterial contact, including collision, attachment, and detachment
[105][129]. As to transformation, the adherence of high concentrations of mineral particles to bacteria may damage fimbriae, while its absence will greatly reduce the expression of competent genes and the formation of competent bacteria, thus affecting the transformation process of ARGs
[70][106][95,130].
2.2.2. Cell-Cell Contact and Quorum Sensing
The EPS consists of exopolysaccharides, nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and other biomolecules, which determine the surface properties of bacteria (e.g., surface charge) and are critical for inter-bacterial adhesion and communication
[107][131]. It was concluded by Tsuneda et al.
[108][132] that, if the EPS amount is relatively small, cell adhesion onto solid surfaces is inhibited by electrostatic interaction, and cell adhesion is enhanced by polymeric interaction when it is relatively large. This process may affect the contact behavior between bacteria (e.g., conjugation) and may also enrich the plasmid or block the contact between the plasmid and bacteria, thereby affecting transformation. However, few studies have paid attention to the effects of soil components on bacterial EPS production and the transfer of ARGs, while relatively many studies have focused on soil pollutants. For example, Yu et al.
[80][104] found that CeO
2, a typical nanoparticle pollutant in soil, weakened inter-bacterial contact by inhibiting the synthesis of polysaccharides in EPS.
EPS can also act as a permeability barrier to limit the increase in cell membrane permeability and hinder the transformation of ARGs
[109][133]. Wang et al.
[75][100] found that the transformation ability of free ARGs was higher than that of activated sludge EPS when calculated by per ng DNA, and lower when calculated by per g volatile suspended solids (VSS). This phenomenon proved that although activated sludge EPS had a certain inhibitory effect on gene transfer. Due to the large amount of ARGs contained in EPS, it has a significant enrichment effect on ARGs, and may be an important environmental source of extracellular ARGs for bacteria.
Bacterial quorum sensing is a form of bacterial cell-to-cell communication that enables bacteria to sense the presence and number of other bacteria within their surrounding environment and to rapidly respond to changes in population density
[110][134]. Autoinducers such as acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) are common signaling molecules for quorum sensing
[111][135]. Zhang et al.
[85][109] found that six AHLs could promote the conjugation frequency to varying degrees between the same bacteria genera during the advanced treatment of drinking water using biologically activated carbon.
2.2.3. Bacterial Uptake of Extracellular ARGs
The Competent State of Bacteria
Bacterial cells must first develop a regulated physiological state of competence for natural transformation, which allows the occurrence of stable uptake, integration, and functional expression of extracellular DNA
[39][53]. Taking
Bacillus subtilis (
B. subtilis) as an example, the formation of its competence requires the competency stimulating factor (CSF)
[112][136], while the strong adsorption of CSF by kaolinite and montmorillonite reduced the transformation of ARGs
[70][95]. In addition, the development of a competent state is also affected by various environmental stresses, such as population density, starvation, and DNA damage
[113][114][115][137,138,139]. Soil bacterial communities normally live under conditions of starvation
[116][140]. Inaoka et al.
[113][137] noticed that the competent genes of
B. subtilis 168 were up-regulated under these conditions and tended to be competent. Transformation is entirely directed by the recipient cell, and all required proteins are encoded in the core genome
[117][141], so we should pay more attention to the gene expression of the recipient cell. Mineral-cell adhesion may influence the expression of competent genes in bacteria, thereby interfering with the development of a competent state
[70][95].
Availability of Extracellular ARGs
As early as around 2000, the adsorption of DNA by soil components and the transformation activity of the adsorbed DNA have been thoroughly studied, not only for plasmids but also for chromosomes
[74][99]. Some important components in soil can protect DNA from being degraded through the adsorption of nucleases so that it can be retained in the environment for a long time
[69][12], and the adsorbed DNA still has transformation activity
[73][98]. The interface that adsorbs DNA and the ion species or concentrations in the surrounding environment will affect the desorption and configuration of DNA
[118][142]. Hu et al.
[71][96] believed that the adsorption and desorption processes of ARGs by montmorillonite would cause a locally high concentration of ARGs around the montmorillonite particles, which was beneficial to the uptake of free ARGs by competent bacteria.
2.2.4. Bacterial Concentration
The HGT process and the proliferation of ARB and ARGs in soil are intrinsically dependent on bacterial growth and concentration
[87][88][111,112], especially for conjugation
[119][143], but there are few studies on soil components that affect the concentration of bacteria and then influence the HGT of ARGs. The production of conjugants will be inhibited when the donor-to-recipient concentration ratio (R
D/R) is too high
[119][120][121][143,144,145]. Dahlberg et al.
[120][144] found that the lowest concentration of donor bacteria created the highest conjugation frequency of plasmids.