Huntington’s Disease: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Manuela Bozzi and Version 2 by Vicky Zhou.

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused

by pathogenic expansions of the triplet cytosine-adenosine-guanosine (CAG) within the Huntingtin

gene. These expansions lead to a prolongation of the poly-glutamine stretch at the N-terminus of

Huntingtin causing protein misfolding and aggregation. Huntingtin and its pathological variants are

widely expressed, but the central nervous system is mainly a ected, as proved by the wide spectrum

of neurological symptoms, including behavioral anomalies, cognitive decline and motor disorders.



Other hallmarks of HD are loss of body weight and muscle atrophy. This review highlights some

key elements that likely provide a major contribution to muscle atrophy, namely, alteration of the

transcriptional processes, mitochondrial dysfunction, which is strictly correlated to loss of energy

homeostasis, inflammation, apoptosis and defects in the processes responsible for the protein quality

control. The improvement of muscular symptoms has proven to slow the disease progression and

extend the life span of animal models of HD, underlining the importance of a deep comprehension of

the molecular mechanisms driving deterioration of muscular tissue.

  • Huntington disease
  • skeletal muscle
  • neurolodegenerative disease

1. Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative pathology, caused by defects of the IT-15 gene encoding Huntingtin protein, a large 348 kDa protein predicted to form an elongated and flexible superhelix [1]. At its N-terminus, Huntingtin harbors an expandable poly-glutamines (polyQ) stretch, starting at amino acid 18, followed by a proline-rich domain. Huntingtin is conserved between Drosophila and mammals, but the number of glutamines increases with the evolution, with the longest known polyQ tract found in humans [2]. The proline-rich domain is found only in mammalian Huntingtin and it is crucial for the interactions with proteins containing homology region 3 (SH3) or tryptophane (WW) domains [2]. All Huntingtin orthologs contain HEAT repeats located downstream of the proline-rich domain. HEAT repeats (named according to four proteins in which they were first detected: Huntingtin, Elongation factor 3, regulatory A subunit of protein phosphatase 2A and TOR1) are formed by 40 amino acids that occur multiple times along the length of the protein and mediate protein-protein interaction [2]. Huntingtin is essential for murine embryogenesis [3][4][5][3,4,5] and interacts with an ever growing number of protein partners (to date they are more than 400) [6][7][6,7], being involved in many biological functions, including regulation of gene transcription, RNA splicing, protein degradation and vesicle transport [8].

HD is due to expansion of the triplet cytosine-adenosine-guanosine (CAG) within the exon 1 of the IT-15 gene generating an aberrant prolongation of the polyQ stretch [9]. Many studies reported that the CAG repeats length is inversely related to the age of HD onset [10][11][10,11]. Healthy subjects have fewer than 35 CAG repeats, with a number of CAG repeats usually comprised between 17 and 20 [12]; individuals with a number of CAG repeats comprised between 36 and 40 manifest the first symptoms in the fourth decade of life, while CAG repeats greater than 60 are associated to juvenile forms of HD [13]. The abnormal length of the polyQ stretch causes protein misfolding and aggregation, leading to alterations in the many protein-protein interaction networks in which Huntingtin is involved and a toxic gain-of-function [14][15][14,15]. Whether the toxicity of mutant Huntingtin is due to its aggregates or its soluble oligomers remains a matter of debate, since it has been proposed that mutant Huntingtin aggregates play a protective role, by removing the soluble oligomeric forms that represent the toxic species [16]. In any case, the formation of mutant Huntingtin containing aggregates is correlated with disease progression. In addition, mutant Huntingtin is particularly exposed to the activity of many proteases that generate proteolytic fragments with increased toxicity [17][18][19][20][17,18,19,20]. The enhanced proteolysis observed in HD is crucial for the pathogenesis and leads to the generation and accumulation of intracellular small toxic N-terminal fragments containing the polyQ stretch [21][22][21,22].

Typical symptoms of HD include psychiatric disorders, behavioral anomalies, cognitive decline and motor dysfunction, such as involuntary muscle contractions that cause irregular jerky movements (chorea), slow movements (bradykinesia), postural abnormalities (dystonia) and muscle rigidity [13][23][24][13,23,24].

When HD was identified, it was thought to be a neuronal pathology involving the central nervous system, but it soon became evident that it involves also peripheral tissues, although at different extents. Indeed, Huntingtin is widely expressed in neuronal cells, but also in many peripheral tissues, like heart, skeletal muscle, kidney, and liver, where its abundancy is comparable to that of the brain [25][26][27][28][29][30][25,26,27,28,29,30]. Dysfunction of peripheral cells also occurs when they are isolated in vitro suggesting that the pathogenesis of HD in peripheral tissues may be independent of the central nervous system. In fact, it has been shown that the same pathways that lead to neurodegeneration are also active in myoblast and blood cells cultures from HD patients and the peripheral manifestations of HD are thought to be a contributor to its morbidity and mortality [31][32][31,32]. Among peripheral tissues, skeletal muscle is heavily involved, as can be deduced by relevant clinical evidences displayed by HD patients and animal models of HD (Table 1) that experience muscular weakness [33][34][33,34] and progressive muscular wasting [35][36][35,36], which are not necessarily associated with alterations in brain functions [37][38][37,38].

The synoptic diagram is reported in Figure 1.

Figure 1. The scheme represents the main mechanisms contributing to muscle weakness and atrophy in HD and their interconnections. Dotted lines represent putative connections. Htt, Huntingtin. Created with BioRender.com.

2. Therapies for HD Treatment

A vast number of drugs  is currently under study for treatment of different symptoms of HD, as reviewed in many worthy articles [39][40][170,171]. Inhibition of the myostatin/activin A signaling, by injecting in R6/2 mice a soluble inactive form of the activin type IIB receptor, which competes with the natural receptor for circulating agonists, restored the normal fiber diameter, muscular mass, contractile functions and number of motor units at the wild-type levels [41][68]. Myostatin is a secreted growth factor, belonging to the transforming growth factor β super family that modulates muscle size, through its binding to the activin type IIB receptor, and deletion of its gene leads to muscular hypertrophy [42][43][172,173]. Interestingly, the rescue of the normal phenotype occurred without reducing nuclear aggregates, but rather increasing the percentage of nuclei containing Huntingtin aggregates that were increased in size [41][68]. Probably, inhibition of the myostatin/activin A signaling re-activated some transcriptional patterns, compensating for transcriptional dysfunctions linked to the presence of mutant Huntingtin and preventing the continuous replenishing of damaged muscle fibers with new centrally nucleated satellite cells, in which the formation of Huntingtin aggregates has not yet occurred [41][68]. This supports the view that the soluble forms of the mutant Huntingtin would be more harmful than its aggregates.

Many drugs targeting oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions have shown to ameliorate HD symptomatology [44][174]. For example, treating R6/2 mice with bezafibrate, an agonist of PPARs, restored the mRNA levels of PGC-1α. This brought about various beneficial effects, such as an improvement of mitochondrial shape and alignment, an appropriate redistribution of type I and type II muscle fibers, an increased muscular strength and performances and an extension of the life span [45][92]. Coenzyme Q10, a component of the electron transport chain, raised an initial enthusiasm for its ability to alleviate muscle dysfunction by promoting aerobic respiration and scavenging toxic reactive oxidative species [46][47][48][175,176,177]. Unfortunately, further large-scale studies, carried out on HD patients [49][178] and HD mouse models [50][179], demonstrated that coenzyme Q10 does not provide significant benefits in HD. Furthermore, creatine and eicosapentaenoic acid improved muscle performances by reducing mitochondrial damages in HD patients, but failed to rescue neuromuscular and cognitive functions [51][52][180,181]. Molecules aimed at reducing inflammation attracted a lot of interest, such as Laquinimod that plays an immunomodulatory role [53][182] and improved motor function and striatal neuropathology in R6/2 HD mice [54][183].

Antibody blockage of Semaphorin 4D, a transmembrane signaling protein that acts as immunomodulatory agent, displayed beneficial effects on YAC128 HD mice [55][184]. Molecules that inhibit TNF-α signaling have been also considered for their anti-inflammatory effects, but they exhibited limited ability to alleviate HD symptoms [56][185]. Currently, only two drugs achieved approval for treatment of HD, namely, the Tetrabenazine and its deuterated variant Deutetrabenazine, which showed better tolerability. These two molecules block the dopamine pathway by inhibiting vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) type 2. However, the therapeutic relevance of these two drugs is limited to the treatment of chorea and other motor dysfunction, as they are not able to block or slow down the HD progression [57][58][59][60][186,187,188,189]. It is now clear that the only therapeutic strategies that could really block the HD progression must be aimed at eliminating or at least reducing the levels of mutant Huntingtin. Indeed, drugs that facilitate the removal of the mutant Huntingtin misfolded variants, by promoting proteasome activity and macroautophagy, showed beneficial effects [61][190]. The efficacy of a vaccination based on the immunogenicity of three non-overlapping peptides identified within the amino acid sequence of the Huntingtin exon 1 was tested in preliminary studies [62][63][191,192]. Reduction of mutant Huntingtin aggregation and toxicity was also observed in cell culture and animal models of HD treated with different recombinant antibodies directed against Huntingtin [56][185]. Inhibition of Huntingtin mRNA translation has been successfully obtained with non-coding RNAs, such as small interfering RNAs, short hairpin RNAs, microRNAs, as well as with small molecules, such as coumarin derivatives [64][193]. Further therapeutic approaches likely to be developed in the next future are based on the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing that could be employed to excise the abnormal CAG repeats or to introduce missense mutations, in order to render mutant Huntingtin innocuous [64][193].

At this time, the most promising therapeutic application is based on antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that are short single-stranded synthetic DNA oligomers composed of 8–50 nucleotides that bind mRNAs through Watson–Crick base pairing. The DNA-RNA double strands meet three different fates: degradation by endogenous enzymes, such as ribonuclease H, inhibition of mRNA translation or modulation of mRNA splicing [65][194]. For HD treatment, two categories of ASOs were developed, one that targets both, wild-type and mutant Huntingtin mRNAs, and the other that selectively targets mutant Huntingtin mRNA. This latter offers the advantage of maintaining adequate levels of wild-type Huntingtin that are needed for many cellular functions [64][66][193,195]. Therapeutic agents targeting RNA or DNA must be delivered to the cells, a particularly challenging task, especially for the central nervous system that can be reached by crossing the blood-brain barrier. From this point of view, skeletal muscle represents a more accessible tissue that can be targeted by any kind of drugs more easily. As a matter of fact, different studies demonstrated that rescue of the muscular function may mitigate the effects of a systemic disease, such as HD, even if the underlying molecular mechanisms of the disease are not targeted [41][45][68,92]. This can be explained considering that muscle releases myokines that produce beneficial effects for many organs, including the brain, and therefore, its correct function may have positive widespread repercussions.

3. Conclusions



The high expression levels of Huntingtin in skeletal muscle render this tissue heavily involved in

the pathophysiology of the HD. The occurring of soluble and non-soluble oligomeric forms of mutant

Huntingtin causes mitochondrial dysfunction, related to loss of energy homeostasis, oxidative stress,

inflammation and apoptosis. In addition, it probably impairs the effciency of the protein quality control

systems, such as ubiquitin-proteasome system and macroautophagy, further exacerbating damages

driven by the accumulation of mutated Huntingtin aggregates (see Figure 1). Mutant Huntingtin

promotes these pathologic events by triggering a profound alteration of the transcriptome, which has

widespread repercussions. Moreover, it is very likely that the mutant Huntingtin establishes aberrant

interactions with mitochondria, autophagosome and proteasome, altering their physiologic functions,

as demonstrated in other tissues. Very few studies have been focused on defects of the protein quality

control systems in HD skeletal muscle, but there are many clues suggesting that impairment of these

processes may play an important role in muscle dysfunction, so that it would be very useful to

investigate this aspect further. In the light of these considerations, preventing the accumulation of

misfolded forms of mutant Huntingtin, by stimulating macroautophagy and/or proteasome-driven

protein degradation, could represent a rational therapeutic approach.



Interestingly, many pathologic events occurring in HD skeletal muscle, such as mitochondrial

dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation and reduced eciency of the protein quality control

systems, also characterize the natural aging process, leading to loss of muscle mass and strength, called

sarcopenia. From this point of view, the HD muscle phenotype resembles that of a precociously aged

muscle. This suggests that some therapeutic interventions that are beneficial for sarcopenia can be

introduced in the treatment of HD.



There are two still open issues: the first one is whether muscle dysfunction is a primary defect, or

a consequence of nerve degeneration. The second one is the reason for which the detrimental eff ects

driven by the expression of mutant Huntingtin are more severe for some organs than others, although

Huntingtin and its pathological variants are expressed at similar levels in many organs, such as liver,

lung, kidney, testis, beside brain and skeletal muscle. Further studies are needed to obtain a deeper

comprehension of these aspects.