1. Lactoferrin
Over the past 60 years of intensive research, as many as 20 different physiological activities of LF have been described
[1][2][3][4][5][6][73,74,75,76,77,78]. In this
resear
ch, the researchers ticle, we will mainly focus on
lactoferrin (LF)LF, with particular attention being paid to its actions in the amelioration of side effects caused by antibiotic and
non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)NSAID therapies, as well as psychophysical stress, so LF activity is described below in some detail.
The ability to bind iron, fight microbes and regulate hematopoiesis are among the most important properties of LF and LF-derived peptides. Other properties of LF include regulating immune system function (immunosuppression or immunoactivation) and oxidoreduction (redox) processes (i.e., those during which oxygen free radicals are released), inhibiting cancer cell growth, promoting osteogenesis and wound healing, regulating glucose and lipid metabolism, supporting bowel functions and enriching intestinal microbiota. Other properties of LF, such as antistress, hypotensive and analgesic effects, are equally important. All of these effects of LF positively affect many aspects of our health, playing a particularly important role in the development of newborns and infants, as well as in older patients treated for a variety of infections (including bacteremia and sepsis) and during convalescence after serious diseases, surgery or chemotherapy
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][60,67,68,70,73,74,75,76,77,78]. LF may be regarded as a “biological drug” which is active by systemic (oral, intravenous, intramuscular and subcutaneous) and topical (on mucous membranes and skin) administration
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][60,61,62,64,65,66,67,68,70,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]. An overview of LF activity is shown in
Figure 13.
Figure 13. Overview of LF activities. In the central part, native LF isolated from bovine milk—salmon-colored powder (the intensity of the color depends on the degree of iron saturation—the more iron bound to the LF molecules, the darker the color of the powder); native LF is saturated at around 10% (photo by J. Artym).
LF inhibits the development of infections in both a direct and indirect manner. Direct effects of LF on microbes include: • binding iron ions and removing them from the microbe growth environment; • damage to cell structures (mainly cell membranes and walls and mitochondria), which leads to osmotic disruption and limited nutrition, resulting in microbe cells being weakened or killed; • induction of apoptotic death of infected cells, which restricts the spread of infection; • inhibiting pathogen adhesion to epithelial cells, which prevents the development of infection; • enzymatic destruction of virulence factors (e.g., enzymes and receptors) produced by pathogens; • inhibiting proton pumps (both H
+/K
+ ATPases and V-ATPases); • inhibiting the formation of biofilms on the surfaces of affected epithelia, implants, medical prostheses, etc.; • forming reactive oxygen species, which signal the inflammatory process and are toxic to microbes; • promoting growth of commensal physiological microflora on the skin and mucosa surfaces (these microbes compete with pathogenic or potentially pathogenic microbiota, thus restricting their growth)
[4][7][8][9][10][16][19][58,60,67,68,70,76,79].
Indirect effects occur through regulation of immune system activity by strengthening it at early stages of infection (to accelerate the elimination of infectious agents and heal damaged areas) and weakening it at later stages (to facilitate the restoration of homeostasis).
LF regulates the maturation of T and B lymphocytes, the activity of NK cells, granulocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells and other immune cells, and the production of cytokines, metalloproteinases, oxygen free radicals and other inflammatory agents. Moreover, it accelerates the repair of damaged tissues and healing wounds
[3][75].
LF has an extremely important role in the gastrointestinal tract, which is particularly important in newborns as well as in the elderly and active athletes. It stimulates growth, accelerates maturation and has a protective effect on intestinal tissues—epithelial cells and immune cells of lymph nodules—increases the secretion of digestive enzymes, strengthens the physiological intestinal microbiota, inhibits toxin production and the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms, and seals tight junctions between epithelial cells, resulting in reducing intestinal permeability. In addition, LF inhibits chronic inflammation and the development of polyps, which represent an early stage of intestinal cancer
[17][18][20][80,81,82].
Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies indicates that bovine-milk-derived LF has good bioavailability and a good safety profile with no serious side effects, both after systemic and topical use in humans and animals
[1][5][6][21][22][73,77,78,83,84]. The protein is widely available and relatively cheap because it is isolated from milk in a well-established, standardized, large-scale manufacturing process
[1][23][73,85]. The application of bovine LF has been approved by various agencies, such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in Europe and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US
[24][25][86,87]. Of importance, despite concerns regarding possible enzymatic degradation of LF in the gastrointestinal tract, oral administration of LF in rats elicits similar intracellular signaling to LF given intravenously
[26][88]. More importantly, buccal administration of LF to healthy volunteers resulted in regulation of their immune status
[27][28][89,90].
2. Lactoferrin as Supportive Therapy in Antibiotic Treatment
Adverse side effects may occur during antibiotic therapy or combinatorial therapy with antibiotics with other types of drugs. The most common side effects of antibiotics are diarrhea, nausea, headache, intestinal inflammation, thrush, aphthae, rashes and vaginal mycosis. The side effects of excessive or non-selective antibiotic use are caused by elimination of both physiological and pathogenic bacteria. As a consequence, disruption to the composition of the natural intestinal and urogenital microbiota occurs. A therapy with single classical antibiotics may not be sufficient to cure some infections, so protocols involving several antibiotics with a different killing spectrum must be used. Such an approach increases the undesirable effects of the therapy. BC, LF and other BC-derived biocomponents can alleviate the side effects of antibiotic therapy but also may enhance its efficacy by direct and indirect (via immune system stimulation) antimicrobial effects. These natural products have a multi-directional effect on pathogenic microorganisms, so antibiotic resistance does not develop.
2.1. Antibiotic Treatment in In Vitro and Animal Models
In a mouse model, inflammatory foci in lungs of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected animals hamper the penetration of therapeutics to infected sites and bacteria destruction. Oral recombinant human LF (rhLF) was used in C57BL mice as an adjuvant therapy with ofloxacin fluoroquinolone
[29][91]. Histological analysis revealed that treatment with LF enabled penetration of the antibiotic to the pathologic sites populated with activated macrophages. The increased antibiotic penetration also preserved endothelial cell integrity. In addition, the phenotypes of macrophages showed an increased M-2-like pattern.
Entamoeba histolytica is a dangerous parasite that attacks the liver and intestine, often causing dysentery by perforating the large intestine. Metronidazole is applied for the treatment of amoebiosis but produces toxic effects (such as nausea and a bad taste in the mouth) in patients. Hamsters infected with amoeba that were given bLF intragastrically (2.5 mg/100 g b.w.) for 8 days showed no symptoms of the disease, and amoebic liver abscess was present in less than 1% of the animals, compared with 63% in controls. In addition, the liver function and blood cell parameters were restored to almost normal levels
[30][92].
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is often accompanied with infections by the opportunistic pathogen
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Inhibition of its elastase enzymes and iron uptake by its siderophores—pyoverdins—could be valuable therapeutic targets
[31][93]. The elastase produced by
P. aeruginosa causes a rapid release of iron from transferrin and its uptake by pyoverdins, but LF is not a source of iron for these bacteria
[32][94]. This suggests the possibility of using LF to treat CF patients. These facts prompted clinicians to use exogenous LF for treatment of CF patients, since endogenous LF in the airways of CF patients is proteolytically cleaved by cathepsin activity in
P. aeruginosa [33][95]. In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate a potential, concerted effect of LF and antibiotics on reducing bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) numbers in an in vitro cell line model
[34][96] and sputum from CF patients
[35][97]. For these studies, ALX-109—a combination of apo-bLF with hypothiocyanite (OSCN
-—a bactericidal agent)—an experimental drug developed by Alaxia (Lyon, France), was used. In a model applying airway epithelial cells from CF patients infected with
P. aeruginosa, ALX-109 was used in combination with tobramycin or aztreonam
[34][96]. It appeared that ALX-109 alone reduced bacterial biofilms and showed an additive effect with tobramycin in reducing bacterial CFUs and enhanced the ability of aztreonam to reduce
P. aeruginosa biofilm. The authors concluded that a combination of ALX-109 with antibiotics, in the form of an inhalatory aerosol, could be beneficial in decreasing bacterial infection in the airways of CF patients. Such an assumption was supported by another study in which sputum from CF patients was treated with ALX-009 (another combination of apo-bLF with hypothiocyanite) alone or combined with tobramycin
[35][97]. ALX-009 alone demonstrated a bactericidal action on the
P. aeruginosa in the sputum samples more potent than that of tobramycin, but this effect was even stronger when combined with tobramycin.
Bovine LF saturated in 85% with Fe
3+ (holo-bLF) prevented the vegetative cell growth and toxin production of a clinical strain of
Clostridium difficile in triple-stage chemostat gut models
[36][98]. The glass vessels were inoculated with human feces and spiked with
C. difficile spores, holo-bLF or apo-bLF (saturated in 1% with Fe
3+), and clindamycin for simulation of
C. difficile infection (CDI). Apo-bLF was ineffective. The authors concluded that LF may be a proper addition to the standard prevention and treatment of CDI in patients in long-term care. CDI develops after treatment with antibiotics and is a major cause of chronic, debilitating diarrhea in hospitals and care facilities. Hospital strains of this bacterium are often antibiotic-resistant, making treatment much more difficult. The results are consistent with the observation in a clinical trial that bLF reduced the incidence of post-antibiotic diarrhea in a long-term-care patient
[37][99].
In in vitro tests, bLF and other iron chelators were tested against various strains of
Cryptococcus, an opportunistic yeast that causes dangerous infections in immunocompromised patients. LF showed a synergistic effect with amphotericin B against all yeast strains tested, but this effect was not mainly due to iron chelation, but to other LF activities that were enhanced in the presence of the antibiotic
[38][100].
2.2. Antibiotic Treatment in Clinics
In a case report with 26-year-old women suffering from post-influenza otitis media infection, no therapeutic benefit was obtained after treatment with antibiotics and steroids (Atecortin and Dicortineff)
[39][101]. The pathogens were
Staphylococcus homis and
Staphylococcus epidermidis. A specific bacteriophage therapy (3 weeks) was also not completely effective. However, oral application of bLF (50 mg daily for 7 days, with two-week intervals), led to a full recovery, associated with increased myelopoiesis and elevated serum LF concentration.
Tooth extraction is often associated with post-extraction complications, even with application of antibiotics. A total of 111 patients with local post-extraction complications treated with antibiotics were enrolled in a clinical study
[40][102]. The patients were divided into three groups taking (A) amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (2 g/day for 6 days), (B) the antibiotics plus
Bifidobacterium longum (a probiotic) plus bLF and (C) a placebo group. The degree of complications was recorded on days 7, 14 and 21 after the extractions. The results showed that pain was present for 48%, 30% and 71.4% of the respective groups, with similar differences in the mean numeric rating scores. Two patients from the placebo group experienced dry socket. Nine patients from the antibiotic only group and one patient from the antibiotic and probiotic/LF group had intestinal distention. Diarrhea was registered in three patients from the antibiotic alone group but was absent in the other groups.
Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) can result from hospital-acquired infections. In a clinical, randomized, double-blind study involving tube-fed, long-term-care adult patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea, rhLF was orally applied for 8 weeks
[37][99]. It appeared that fewer patients in the LF-treated group suffered from diarrhea. However, in another prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study, no therapeutic benefit of bLF application in children (n = 156) with AAD was found
[41][103].
In several clinical trials, LF was included in therapeutic protocols to prevent side effects of antibiotic therapy in
Helicobacter pylori infection. In a clinical trial involving children, all patients were treated for 4 weeks with a combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (the therapeutic regimen also for group A)
[42][104]. Some of the patients received, in addition, a probiotic Probinul-Cadigroup containing LF (group B). Health status was evaluated at the end of the treatment. The results of the treatments were as follows. Epigastric pain occurred in 17.6% of group A versus 5.8% of B group patients, nausea in 8.8% of group A versus 2.9% of group B, diarrhea and vomiting in 5.8% and 23.5%, respectively, of group A versus none in group B. A total of 2.3% of patients tested negative for
H. pylori. In conclusion, the addition of LF to the therapeutic protocol decreased the occurrence of the described side effects.
In a similar study on adult patients (n = 206), bLF and probiotics were used to improve therapeutic efficacy and lower side effects of standard antibiotic therapy (esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin) during an 8-week treatment
[43][105]. At the end of the treatment, 84.95% of patients showed negative results for
H. pylori in the group treated with antibiotics only and 92.0% in the group given, in addition, LF + probiotics. Moreover, more patients in the antibiotic group reported side effects. In conclusion, better eradication of infection and limitation of side effects were registered thanks to the inclusion of LF and probiotics in the triple antibiotic therapy for
H. pylori.
A prospective, randomized study was also performed on 76 patients after failure of a first, conventional quadruple therapy
[44][106]. All patients were treated with a combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate, esomeprazole, amoxicillin and tinidazole for 7 days. The therapeutic regimen was supplemented in one group with bLF (400 mg daily). One month after the therapy, an endoscopy and the
13C-urea breath test (UBT) were performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. Eradication
H. pylori in the bLF group was 94.3% (33/35) and in the control group was 88.6% (31/35), as assessed by UBTs and histological analysis. Side effects were recorded in 29.4% of patients in the antibiotic alone group versus 17.6% in the patients taking LF supplementation.
A recent parallel RCT included 400 adult patients with
H. pylori infection
[45][107]. They were randomized into four equal groups: (A) proton-pump-based triple therapy (PpTT) involving proton pump inhibitors: esomeprazole plus antibiotics: amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 2 weeks, (B) esomeprazole plus amoxicillin for 5 days and then esomeprazole plus metronidazole and clarithromycin 10 days, (C) PpTT as in group A plus bLF in 200 mg sachets (overall daily dose 400 mg) for 2 weeks and (D) sequential therapy as in group B plus bLF for 2 weeks, as above. Bacterial eradication was significantly better in both groups treated with LF (percentages of eradication for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 70.3%, 82.8%, 85.6% and 94.5%, respectively). The authors made no mention of differences in the frequencies of adverse side effects of these therapies (dizziness and headache, fatigue, nausea, taste disturbance and colonic distension were observed).
LF, in addition to its antimicrobial effect, exhibits IPP-like activity, inhibiting both H+/K+-ATPase and V-ATPase. The protein was shown to be more active at acidic pH and had a good safety profile
[16][46][79,108]. This LF activity may further enhance the efficacy of classical therapy used in
H. pylori eradication.