Interaction of Chromolaena odorata with the Natural Enemy: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Conner Chen and Version 2 by Conner Chen.

Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King & H. Robinson is native to tropical America, and has naturalized in many other countries in tropical Asia, Austria, and West Africa. The species often forms dense thickets and reduces the native species diversity and population in the invasive ranges. The species is also considered as a noxious weed in agriculture fields, and listed in the 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. The interaction between the invasive plants and their natural enemies such as herbivores and pathogens, is one of the important factors for the naturalization of the invasive plants. The population of C. odorata is controlled by many insects and pathogens in its native ranges. More than 200 species of the herbivores were counted in the native ranges of C. odorata, and 25% of them are specific species in the native ranges. There may be fewer specific herbivores in the invasive ranges. In fact, very few specific insect species for C. odorata in the invasive range (South Africa) were counted.

  • allelochemical
  • herbivore
  • invasive species

1. Interaction of C. hromolaena odorata with the Natural Enemy

The interaction between the invasive plants and their natural enemies such as herbivores and pathogens, is one of the important factors for the naturalization of the invasive plants [1][2][3][4][5]. The population of C. odorata is controlled by many insects and pathogens in its native ranges [6][7]. More than 200 species of the herbivores were counted in the native ranges of C. odorata, and 25% of them are specific species in the native ranges [8]. There may be fewer specific herbivores in the invasive ranges. In fact, very few specific insect species for C. odorata in the invasive range (South Africa) were counted [9]. According to the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis, the success of the invasive species is due to fewer specialized predators in the invasive ranges. The invasive plants can allocate the resources from the high-cost defense strategy to the low-cost defense strategy and plant growth, leading to the successful naturalization [10][11].

2. Interaction of C. odorata with Insects

Powder of the roots, stems, and leaves of C. odorata increased the mortality of leaf beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius [12][13]. Essential oil obtained from C. odorata leaves also increased the mortality of adult weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky [14][15]. Aqueous leaf extract of C. odorata induced the increasing larval mortality of black fly, Simulium spp. [16], and an adult stage of cockroach, Periplaneta americana Linnaeus [17]. Aqueous ethanol leaf extracts of C. odorata were applied to Aabelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench once a week for 4–7 weeks after its planning. The treatments resulted in the reduction of the population of whitefly, Bemissa tabaci Gennadius, and leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula Ishida on Aabelmoschus esculentus [18]. The methanol extracts of C. odorata leaves also showed ovicidal, antifeedant, and larvicidal activity on a leaf-eating insect, Spodoptera litura Fabricius [19]. These observations suggest that C. odorata possess anti-insect activity and contain certain compounds involved in the activity.
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids such as 7- and 9-angeloylretronecine, intermedine, rinderine, and 3′-acetylrinderine were isolated from roots and mature flower heads of C. odorata [20], and rinderine N-oxide and intermedine N-oxide were identified in its roots [21] (Figure 2). Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are amino alcohols, esterified with mono- or dicarboxylic acids [22], and act as chemical defense agents against herbivores such as insects and mammals [23][24][25][26]. The compounds are highly toxic including hepatotoxicity, and disturb several metabolisms in the cell functions [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, these pyrrolizidine alkaloids in C. odorata may be involved in the anti-insect activity caused by the extracts and power of the species as describe above, and contribute to the protection of the species from herbivore attacks.
Plants 12 00521 g002
Figure 2. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids; 1: 7-angeloylretronecine, 2: 9-angeloylretronecine, 3: 3′-acetylrinderine, 4; rinderine, 5: intermedine, 6: rinderine N-oxide, 7: intermedine N-oxide, 8: 1,2-dehydropyrrolizine alkaloid.
Some specialist insects obtain pyrrolizidine alkaloids from plants and store them. Those stored pyrrolizidine alkaloids are used for their protection from their predators as poison, and for the precursors to synthesize their mail pheromones [22][31][32]. However, C. odorata may scarcely meet these specialist insects in its invasive ranges since the host plants of the sspecialist insects are narrow and there may be no such co-evolutional history between C. odorata and the insects in the invasive ranges (Figure 2, Table 1).
Table 1. Interaction of C. odorata with insects.
Source Insect Action Reference
Root powder Callosobruchus maculatus Mortality (100%) at 8% (weight of powder/weight of crop grain) [12]
Leaf powder Callosobruchus maculatus Mortality (51%) at 1.7% (weight of powder/weight of crop grain) [13]
Essential oil from leaves Sitophilus zeamais Mortality (100%) at 0.5% (volume of essential oil/weight of crop grain) [14]
Leaf extract Sitophilus zeamais Mortality (50%) at 40 μg/mL methanol extract [15]
  Simulium spp. Mortality (100%) at 1 mg dry mass of aqueous extract/mL [16]
  Periplaneta americana Mortality (36%) at 1 mL dose of 20% (w/v) aqueous extract [17]
  Bemissa tabaci, Amrasca biguttula Population 25–50% decrease of control at 2.5% (w/v) ethanol extract [18]
  Spodoptera litura Mortality 68% at 5% (w/v) methanol extract [19]

3. Interaction of C. odorata with Nematodes

Plant parasitic nematodes such as Meloidogyne spp. (root-knot nematode), Helicotylenchus spp., and Pratylenchus spp. feed on the roots of plants, and their feeding process causes serious injuries and reduces the ability of the plants to absorb nutrients and water, leading to losing plant vigor and defense capability against other pathogen attacks [33][34][35]. The population density of nematodes such as Meloidogyne spp., Helicotylenchus spp. and Pratylenchus spp., was suppressed by the C. odorata infestation into the invasive ranges with various soil conditions [36]. It was also reported that C. dorata reduced by 77–81% of plant parasitic nematode population; Meloidogyne spp., Helicotylenchus spp., and Pratylenchus spp. in the soils after two years invention [37]. C. odorata also suppressed the increasing population of Meloidogyne incoginita Kofoid & White in the pot experiments [38]. These observations suggest that some compounds may be released from C. odorata and accumulated in the soils, and these compounds may suppress the population of plant parasitic nematodes in the soils.
The incorporation of plant powder of C. odorata into the field soil prevented the increasing population of Meloidogyne incoginita [39]. Aqueous root extracts and root mulch of C. odorata showed the suppression of the parasitism of Meloidogyne incoginita into the roots of Lactuca sativa L. [40]. Therefore, certain compounds in the plant powder, roots, and extracts of C. odorata may work for the suppression.
1,2-Dehydropyrrolizine alkaloid was identified in the root extracts of C. odorata and the compound showed anti-nematode activity [40] (Figure 2). 1,2-Dehydropyrrolizine alkaloid was reported to be synthesized and stored in vacuole in the roots of C. odorata [41]. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are highly toxic and act as chemical defense agents against natural enemies [23][24][25]. Those observations suggest that the extracts and powder of C. odorata, and the soil under C. odorata may suppress the population of the nematodes, and prevented the hatch and parasitism of the nematodes. Certain compounds including 1,2-dehydropyrrolizine alkaloid may cause the suppression and acts as anti-nematode agents of C. odorata (Table 2).
Table 2. Interaction of C. odorata with nematodes.
Source Nematode Action Reference
Plant infestation soil Meloidogyne spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Pratylenchus spp., Population decrease by 67–79% of control after 30 months [36]
  Meloidogyne spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Pratylenchus spp., Population decrease by 77–81% after 24 months [37]
  Meloidogyne incoginita Population decrease by 92% after 2 months [38]
Plant residues Meloidogyne incoginita Population decrease significantly at 1% (weight of powder/weight of soil) [39]
Root extract Meloidogyne incoginita Parasitism suppression by 0.4–65% of control at 0.1–5% (w/v) aqueous extract [40]
Root mulch Meloidogyne incoginita Parasitism suppression by 0–22% at 0.1–5% (weight of plant/weight of soil) [40]

4. Interaction of C. odorata with Microbial

The invasion of C. odorata into the forest and savanna in West Africa increased the soil microbial activity, and the amount of available N and P in the soil. C. odorata altered the soil microbial community in the invasion ranges. The altered microbial community suppressed the growth of the native plant species such as Eupatorium japonicum Thunb. and Eupatorium heterophyllum DC., and stimulated the growth of C. odorata [42]. The population of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Paraglomus spp. was also increased in the soil under C. odorata [43]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase the ability of their host plants to absorb water and nutrients, and enhance the defense function against several stress conditions and pathogen attacks [44][45][46]. The observations suggest that certain compounds from C. odorata may alter the soil microbial community in the invasion ranges and the alteration may contribute the invasion of C. odorata. However, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Paraglomus spp. colonizes with a wide range of plant species [47][48]. The colonization may occur with other plant species and promote their growth in the invasive ranges of C. odorata. In addition, the abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of C. odorata in its invasive range (South Africa) was reported to be 50% of its native ranges (Puerto Rico) [49].
The rhizosphere soil of C. odorata increased the population of the soil borne fungal pathogen, Fusarium ssp., and inhibited the growth of Amaranthus spinosus L. and Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss. Sterilization of the soil eliminated these effects. The root leachate of C. odorata increased the spore density of Fusarium spp. in C. odorata-free soil. The increases were illuminated by adding activated carbon into the soil [50]. It was also reported that the root exudates of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. increased the population of Fusarium spp. [51], and phenolics in the root exudates of Glycine max (L.) Merr. increased the population of Fusarium spp. [52]. The observations suggest that certain compounds in the root exudate of these plant species including C. odorata may stimulate the increasing population of Fusarium spp. However, it is not clear if the increased Fusarium spp. population affects the growth of C. odorata.
On the contrary, it was reported that the extracts of C. odorata suppressed the growth of some soil borne fungal pathogens including Fusarium spp. Aqueous methanol leaf extracts of C. odorata significantly suppressed the colony growth of the pathogens, Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl. and Lasiodiplodia pseudothobromae A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & Crous [53]. Both Lasiodiplodia spp. are members of the Botryosphaeriaceae family and cause leaf necrosis, canker, and dieback in many plant species [54][55]. The methanol leaf extracts of C. odorata suppressed the growth of Bacillus subtilis Cohn, and Bacillus cereus Frankland & Frankland [56]. The ethanol plant extracts of C. odorata suppressed the growth of soil borne pathogen fungi, Phytophthora colocasiae Racib., and Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. emend. Snyder & Hansen [57]. Acetone extracts of C. odorata also suppressed the colony growth of the pathogen fungi, Pythium ultimum Trow, Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, Fusarium oxysporium Schlecht. emend. Snyder & Hansen, and Phytophthora nicotianae Breda de Haan [58] and Pyricularia oryzae Cavara [59]. Essential oil of C. odorata suppressed the growth of Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, Fusarium graminearum Schwabe, Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) K.J. Leonard & Suggs, Botrytis cinereal Pers., and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary [60]. These observations suggest that the extracts of C. odorata possess the anti-fungal activity, and may contain certain compounds involved in the activity.
Some compounds in the extracts and/or the rhizosphere soil of C. odorata may be involved in the alteration of the microbial community as the observations in those publications (Table 3). The identification of these compounds is also necessary. In addition, the observations described in this section are controversial that whether C. odorata increases the population of fungal pathogen such as Fusarium spp. or suppressed the population. More sophisticate investigations are necessary in the future to explain the interaction of C. odorata with the microbial population.
Table 3. Interaction of C. odorata with microbial population.
Source Species Population Reference
Plant infestation soil Paraglomus spp. Increase biomass significantly after 10 months incubation [43]
Rhizosphere soil Fusarium ssp. Increase spore number 25 times after 5 days incubation [50]
Leaf extract Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Lasiodiplodia pseudothobromae Decrease biomass by 6–17% of control at 3% (w/v; extract residue/medium) [53]
  Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus Decrease population significantly at 10% (w/v; plant weight/solvent) [56]
  Phytophthora colocasiae, Fusarium oxysporum Decrease of the colony expansion by 20–33% of control at 100 mg leaves/mL methanol [57]
  Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporium, Phytophthora nicotianae Inhibitory activity at concentration of 0.09 mg residue of extract/mL of medium [58]
  Pyricularia oryzae Decrease by 12–43% of control at 10% (w/v; extract residue/solvent) [59]

References

  1. Mack, R.M. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: Emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 1996, 78, 107–121.
  2. Chengxu, W.; Mingxing, Z.; Xuhui, C.; Bo, Q. Review on allelopathy of exotic invasive plants. Procedia Eng. 2011, 18, 240–246.
  3. Warren, R.J.; Candeias, M.M.; Labatore, A.; Olejniczak, M.; Yang, L. Multiple mechanisms in woodland plant species invasion. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 12, 201–209.
  4. Keane, R.M.; Crawley, M.L. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 164–170.
  5. Blumenthal, D.M. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol. Let. 2006, 9, 887–895.
  6. McFadyen, R.E.C. Phytophagous insects recorded from Chromolaena odorata. Chromolaena odorata Newsletter. 1988, 2, 5–23.
  7. Barreto, R.W.; Evans, H.C. The mycobiota of the weed Chromolaena odorata in southern Brazil with particular reference to fungal pathogens for biological control. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 1107–1116.
  8. Zhang, L.H.; Feng, Y.L. Potential biological control agents of Chromolaena odorata. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2007, 23, 83–88.
  9. Kluge, R.L.; Caldwell, P.M. Phytophagous insects and mites on Chromolaena odorata (Compositae, Eupatoreae) in Southern Africa. J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr. 1992, 55, 159–161.
  10. Blossey, B.; Notzold, R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants—A hypothesis. J. Ecol. 1995, 83, 887–889.
  11. Muller-Scharer, H.; Schaffner, U.; Steinger, T. Evolution in invasive plants: Implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 417–422.
  12. Uyi, O.O.; Obi, B.N. Evaluation of the repellent and insecticidal activities of the leaf, stem and root powders of Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) against the cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2017, 21, 511–518.
  13. Uyi, O.O.; Igbinoba, O.G. Repellence and toxicological activity of the root powder of an invasive alien plant, Chromolaena odorata (L.)(Asteraceae) against Callosobruchus maculatus (FAB.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Anim. Res. Int. 2016, 13, 2510–2517.
  14. Bouda, H.; Tapondjou, L.A.; Fontem, D.A.; Gumedzoe, M.Y.D. Effect of essential oils from leaves of Ageratum conyzoides, Lantana camara and Chromolaena odorata on the mortality of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 103–109.
  15. Lawal, O.A.; Opoku, A.R.; Ogunwande, I.A. Phytoconstituents and insecticidal activity of different solvent leaf extracts of Chromolaena odorata L., against Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Eur. J. Med. Plants 2015, 5, 237–247.
  16. Mathur, B.M.; Davou, B.J. Comparative larvicidal property of leaf extract of Chromolaena odorata L. (Composidae) and Chlopyrifos (Organophosphorus Compound) on Simulium larvae. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2007, 20, 313–316.
  17. Udebuani, A.C.; Abara, P.C.; Obasi, K.O.; Okuh, S.U. Studies on the insecticidal properties of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) against adult stage of Periplaneta americana. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2015, 3, 318–321.
  18. Nneji, E.T.; Uddin, I.I.R.O.; Musa, A.A. Effects of Boerhavia diffusa L. nom. cons. and Chromolaena odorata (L.). M. King & H. Rob. extracts on some field insect pests of okra (Aabelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Acta Agric. Slov. 2020, 115, 133–139.
  19. Gorawade, V.; Attar, U.; Shiragave, P. Bioefficacy and GC-MS analysis of Chromolaena odorata and Leonotis nepetifolia leaf extracts against Spodoptera litura. J. Crop Prot. 2022, 11, 361–375.
  20. Biller, A.; Boppré, M.; Witte, L.; Hartmann, T. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Chromolaena odorata. Chemical and chemoecological aspects. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 615–619.
  21. Dube, N.; van Heerden, F.R.; Zachariades, C.; Uyi, O.O.; Munyai, T.C. First record of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the southern African biotype of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 139, 19–25.
  22. Boppré, M. Lepidoptera and pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Exemplification of complexity in chemical ecology. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 165–185.
  23. Van Dam, N.M.; Vuister, L.W.; Bergshoeff, C.; de Vos, H.; van der Meijden, E.D. The “Raison D’être” of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Cynoglossum officinale: Deterrent effects against generalist herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21, 507–523.
  24. Joshi, J.; Vrieling, K. The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: Incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 704–714.
  25. Gardner, D.R.; Thorne, M.S.; Molyneux, R.J.; Pfister, J.A.; Seawright, A.A. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Senecio madagascariensis from Australia and Hawaii and assessment of possible livestock poisoning. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34, 736–744.
  26. Stegelmeier, B.L.; Colegate, S.M.; Brown, A.W. Dehydropyrrolizidine alkaloid toxicity, cytotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. Toxins 2016, 8, 356.
  27. Cheeke, P.R. Toxicity and metabolism of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J. Anim. Sci. 1988, 66, 2343–2350.
  28. Tamariz, J.; Burgueño-Tapia, E.; Vázquez, M.A.; Delgado, F. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology; Hans-Joachim Knölker, H.J., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018; Volume 80, pp. 1–314.
  29. Griffiths, M.R.; Strobel, B.W.; Hama, J.R.; Cedergreen, N. Toxicity and risk of plant-produced alkaloids to Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2021, 33, 10.
  30. Kisielius, V.; Hama, J.R.; Skrbic, N.; Hansen, H.C.B.; Strobel, B.J.; Rasmussen, L.H. The invasive butterbur contaminates stream and seepage water in groundwater wells with toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19784.
  31. Conner, W.E. Tiger Moths and Woolly Bears: Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution of the Arctiidae; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–303.
  32. Macel, M. Attract and deter: A dual role for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in plant-insect interactions. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 75–82.
  33. Lambert, K.; Bekal, S. Introduction to Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. The Plant Health Instructor. Available online: https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/disandpath/nematode/intro/Pages/IntroNematodes.aspx (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  34. Den Akker, S.E. Plant—Nematode interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 102035.
  35. Pires, D.; Vicente, C.S.L.; Menéndez, E.; Faria, J.M.S.; Rusinque, L.; Camacho, M.J.; Inácio, M.L. The fight against plant-parasitic nematodes: Current status of bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1178.
  36. Adediran, J.A.; Adegbite, A.A.; Akinlosotu, T.A.; Agbaje, G.O.; Taiwo, L.B.; Owolade, O.F.; Oluwatosin, G.A. Evaluation of fallow and cover crops for nematode suppression in three agroecologies of south western Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 1034–1039.
  37. Odeyemi, I.S.; Afolami, S.O.; Adigun, J.A. Plant parasitic nematode relative abundance and population suppression under Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) fallow. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2013, 59, 79–88.
  38. Sturhan, M.D. Studies on effects of Chromolaena odorata roots on root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita). Nematol. Mediterr. 1994, 22, 273–274.
  39. Odeyemi, I.S.; Afolami, S.O.; Adekoyejo, A.B. Integration of Glomus mosseae with Chromolaena odorata powder for suppression of Meloidogyne incognita on maize (Zea mays L.). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2013, 46, 1589–1597.
  40. Thoden, T.C.; Boppré, M.; Hallmann, J. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Chromolaena odorata act as nematicidal agents and reduce infection of lettuce roots by Meloidogyne incognita. Nematology 2007, 9, 343–349.
  41. Hartmann, T.; Ehmke, A.; Eilert, U.; von Borstel, K.; Theuring, C. Sites of synthesis, translocation and accumulation of pyrrolizidine alkaloid N-oxides in Senecio vulgaris L. Planta 1989, 177, 98–107.
  42. Koné, A.W.; Kassi, S.P.A.; Koffi, B.Y.; Masse, D.; Maïga, A.A.; Tondoh, J.E.; Kisaka, O.M.; Touré, G.P.T. Chromolaena odorata (L.) K&R (Asteraceae) invasion effects on soil microbial biomass and activities in a forest-savanna mosaic. Catena 2021, 207, 105619.
  43. Xiao, H.F.; Feng, Y.L.; Schaefer, D.A.; Yang, X.D. Soil fungi rather than bacteria were modified by invasive plants, and that benefited invasive plant growth. Plant Soil 2014, 378, 253–264.
  44. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 1–815.
  45. Diagne, N.; Ngom, M.; Djighaly, P.I.; Fall, D.; Hocher, V.; Svistoonoff, S. Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Growth and Performance: Importance in Biotic and Abiotic Stressed Regulation. Diversity 2020, 12, 370.
  46. Tang, H.; Hassan, M.U.; Feng, L.; Nawaz, M.; Shah, A.N.; Qari, S.H.; Liu, Y.; Miao, J. The critical role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve drought tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency in crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 919166.
  47. Schüβler, A.; Schwarzott, D.; Walker, C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1413–1421.
  48. Reynolds, H.L.; Packer, A.; Bever, J.D.; Clay, K. Grassroots ecology: Plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology 2003, 84, 2281–2291.
  49. Te Beest, M.; Stevens, N.; Olff, H.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Plant-soil feedback induces shifts in biomass allocation in the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata. J. Ecol. 2009, 97, 1281–1290.
  50. Mangla, S.; Inderjit; Callaway, R.M. Exotic invasive plant accumulates native soil pathogens which inhibit native plants. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 58–67.
  51. Odunfa, V.S.A. Root exudation in cowpea and sorghum and the effect on spore germination and growth of some soil Fusaria. New Phytol. 1987, 80, 607–612.
  52. Ju, H.; Han, L.; Wang, S.; Cong, D. Allelopathic effect of root exudates on pathogenic fungi of root rot in continuous soybean. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 13, 723–727.
  53. Asman, A.; Rosmana, A.; Sjam, S.; Fakhruddin, A.; Natsir, N.U. Antifungal activity of crude extracts of Ageratum conyzoides and Chromolaena odorata for management of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae through in vitro evaluation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 886, 012008.
  54. Ismail, A.M.; Cirvilleri, G.; Polizzi, G.; Crous, P.; Groenewald, W.J.Z.; Lombard, L. Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback disease of mango (Mangifera indica) in Egypt Australas. Plant Pathol. 2012, 41, 649–660.
  55. Li, H.L.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Xu, W.; Hu, M.; Li, X.H.; Liu, J.H.; Hyde, K.D.; Yan, J. Lasiodiplodia theobromae and L. pseudotheobromae causing leaf necrosis on Camellia sinensis in Fujian Province, China. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 41, 277–284.
  56. Naidoo, K.K.; Coopoosamy, R.M.; Naidoo, G. Screening of Chromolaeana odorata (L.) King and Robinson for antibacterial and antifungal properties. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4859–4862.
  57. Okoro, A.; Onaebi, C. Sensitivity assessment of soil-borne pathogens to ethanolic and methanolic leaf extract of Chromolaena odorata (L.) using dilution and diffusion assay methods. J. Phytopathol. 2020, 32, 71–78.
  58. Meela, M.M.; Mdee, L.K.; Masoko, P.; Eloff, J.N. Acetone leaf extracts of seven invasive weeds have promising activity against eight important plant fungal pathogens. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 121, 442–446.
  59. Manjappa, K. Evaluation of antifungal properties of Eupatorium (Chromolaena odorata L.) plant extract against Pyricularia oryzae causing blast disease in rice crop. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 79–81.
  60. Wang, L.; Li, Y.X.; Ge, W.C.; Yuan, K. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oils of Eupatorium catarium and Eupatorium odoratum from China. Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26, 7168–7172.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback