Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composites Processing Optimization: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Camila Xu and Version 1 by Junke Jiao.

Carbon fiber-reinforced composites are widely used in automobile, aerospace and military lightweight manufacturing due to their excellent mechanical properties such as light weight, excellent fracture resistance, corrosion resistance and wear resistance, etc.

  • laser machining
  • carbon fiber-reinforced composites
  • process optimization

1. Introduction

The carbon fiber-reinforced composites (CFRP) have the advantages of high specific strength, low density, light weight and have become a key material for the aerospace and new energy vehicle light-weight manufacturing [1,2][1][2]. CFRP machining is an important process in its application. The machining methods include mechanical and special processing technique as shown in Figure 1 [3,4,5,6][3][4][5][6].
Micromachines 14 00024 g001
Figure 1.
CFRP machining technology.
The mechanical machining includes cutting, drilling and milling, and the carbide tools are used in the machining process [7,8][7][8]. Koklu et al. [9] applied a new low-temperature processing method to the drilling of CFRP, immersed CFRP in liquid nitrogen, and directly processed it in low-temperature coolant. The machining characteristics such as thrust, delamination, tool wear, surface roughness and topography were compared with those under dry conditions. The experimental results showed that the low temperature processing method can improve the process-ability of CFRP. Morkavuk et al. [10] studied the milling performance of CFRP in low-temperature medium. The results showed that the low temperature cooling makes the structure of the workpiece brittle, prevents the thermal damage of the machined surface, improves the chip’s crack resistance, and can obtain a smoother surface. Wang et al. [11] studied the influence of drilling area temperature on the material properties and quality of CFRP. The results showed that the temperature range of the optimum drilling area is lower than the glass transition zone temperature of CFRP composites, and higher than the brittle deformation of resins. Ali et al. [12] studied the cutting performance of tungsten carbide YG6X (WC-6 wt% Co) conventional double groove twist drill on multidirectional T700 CFRP plate and analyzed the influence of different cutting speeds and tool wear modes on drilling performance. Finally, a set of suitable drilling parameters is proposed. Under the conditions of cutting speed of 9000 rpm and feed rate of 400 mm/min, the best quality hole can be produced. The mechanical process is the common method in CFRP machining. However, the cutting force of such tools in the machining process is too large to produce defects such as burrs, delaminated tears and fractures [13,14,15][13][14][15] (Figure 2a), which influence the mechanical resistance of the CFRP components.
Besides the mechanical machining method, the special processing technology is also important method to machining CFRP, which mainly includes waterjet cutting, ultrasonic vibration auxiliary processing, laser processing, etc [16,17,18][16][17][18]. The waterjet cutting uses a high-pressure abrasive water jet for processing [19,20][19][20]. Compared with mechanical machining, the high-pressure water flow cutting technique is environmentally friendly. Pahuja et al. [21] evaluated the machinability of stacked titanium (Ti6Al4V) and CFRP by using the abrasive water jet (AWJ) processing technology. The results showed that the surface roughness and corner width change greatly under the condition of low jet power (Figure 2b). Kumar et al. [22] studied AWJ sections machined under two different process parameters. The results showed that fiber pullout and interlaminar tear can be observed in AWJ cutting under higher jet pressure. Alberdi et al. [23,24][23][24] studied the feasibility of machining CFRP/Ti6Al4V stack with AWJ under different process parameters. The final results showed that under almost all cutting conditions, Ti6Al4V has a positive cone angle. As mentioned above, waterjet cutting technology has a low processing cost and there is no tool wear and excess heat during process [25]. However, the high-pressure water jet will make the soaked polymer softer during processing, exacerbating the adhesion of the carbon fiber matrix [26,27][26][27] and the ability of the cutting surface to absorb moisture, resulting in defects in mechanical properties. Moreover, the impact of water cutting process on CFRP is obvious, making it susceptible to defects such as delamination, burrs, and tapers [28,29][28][29] (Figure 2c).
Ultrasonic vibration machining is another important CFRP machining method, it can reduce cutting force, reduce tool wear and improve machining quality [30]. Ning et al. [31] studied the surface grinding of rotary ultrasonic machining to process CFRP. It was found that the theoretical prediction trend is in good agreement with the experimental results on the relationship between the forward cutting force and the input variables (Figure 2d). Cong et al. [32] compared rotary ultrasonic machining with carbon fiber-reinforced plastic twist drill in terms of cutting force, torque, surface roughness, delamination, tool life, material removal rate, etc. The experimental results showed that rotary ultrasonic machining has advantages in almost all these aspects. At present, rotary ultrasonic machining is better used in milling and drilling, but when it is used for composite cutting, problems such as low efficiency, wide kerf, uneven fiber fracture and interlaminar fragmentation will occur [33], which will affect the performance and life of CFRP parts (Figure 2e).
Micromachines 14 00024 g002
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of the delamination failure emerging as a result of drilling Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [16]; Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (b) Experimental set up depicting AWJ machining of Ti6Al4V/CFRP stack Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [21]; Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (c) Delamination produced in CFRP waterjet cutting process Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [28]; Copyright 2008, Elsevier. (d) Illustration of rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM) surface grinding process Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [31]; Copyright 2017, Springer Nature. (e) Uneven fiber fractures and interlayer fragmentation in CFRP ultrasonic machining Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [33] Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
As a non-contact processing technology, laser machining has lots of advantages in composites processing [34,35][34][35]. Compared with mechanical methods, there is no tool wear and cutting force in the machining process (Figure 3a). Laser cutting has good quality, high precision, narrow incision width and good surface roughness. Due to the anisotropy and non-uniform structure of carbon fiber composites, non-traditional processing technology will lead to material failure, such as fiber pullout, matrix cracking, delamination and expansion. During laser cutting, there is no contact with CFRP composite materials, no tool wear, and no need to replace the tool during processing. As long as the output parameters of the laser are changed, the noise is low, the vibration is small and there is no pollution during processing. Compared with ultrasonic-assisted processing and waterjet processing, laser processing will not produce impact damage or vibration damage. The efficiency can be improved by 20% and can machine CFRP components with various complex curves and shapes [36]. However, due to the large difference in the physical properties between the carbon fiber and the resin matrix, the resin matrix material produces ablation during the laser machining process, and the heat-affected zone (HAZ) [37], crack and broken fibre was produced, which seriously affects the processing quality of CFRP [38,39][38][39] (Figure 3b–e). In order to improve the quality of CFRP laser machining, lots of works about machining process parameters optimization and theoretical model analysis have been carried out. Laser scanning times, scanning speed and average power will affect the quality of laser processed parts. The number of scans is the number of cycles of part pattern processing, which determines the total number of pulses received and the heat absorbed by the CFRP composite surface processing area. More scanning times can play a more sufficient role in ablation and material removal of the processing area of CFRP composite and improve the processing accuracy. Scanning speed refers to the movement speed of the laser spot on the surface of CFRP composite materials during processing. It controls the number of pulse overlaps and the processing path and will affect the energy absorbed in the unit area of the sample surface processing area. The faster the scanning speed is, the fewer pulses are received in the unit area of the processing area, and the smaller the absorbed energy is. The average power of laser is also an important parameter that affects the processing quality of parts. Too large or too small average power will reduce the processing quality of parts. It should be adjusted reasonably according to the actual production and processing.
Micromachines 14 00024 g003
Figure 3. (a) Cutting hole in CFRP plate; (b–e) HAZ, crack, broken fibre produced in laser cutting process; Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [40]; (f) Different aspects of CFRP laser machining. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
By reviewing papers on laser machining of CFRP, it was found that most of the investigations focused on machining parameters optimization and numerical simulation (Figure 3f). The laser machining parameters mainly include the laser wavelength, the laser mode, the laser power and the machining velocity, ect. The numerical simulation includes mathematical model established and numerical calculation of laser machining CFRP.

2. CFRP Laser Processing Optimization

During CFRP laser machining, the energy to evaporate or sublimate carbon fibers is higher than that of the resin matrix [40,41][40][41]. Therefore, in the beam-material interaction process, the time vaporizing the carbon fibers is longer than that vaporizing the resin matrix. Before the carbon fibers are vaporized, a large amount of heat conducts through the carbon fibers and overheats the resin matrix. This heat makes the resin matrix experience thermal degradation and causes the fibers to peel from the substrate, which will lead to delamination [42,43][42][43]. Previous investigations show that these thermal defects can be minimized by optimizing the machining parameters such as the mode, the scanning speed, the laser power, the pulse characteristics and the wavelength of the laser [44].

2.1. Effect of Laser Wavelength on CFRP Machining Quality

CFRP has different absorption coefficients for lasers with different wavelength. To this end, the CFRP machining quality is different for different wavelength lasers [45]. Takahashi compared the effects of infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) lasers on CFRP cutting quality experimentally [46]. For the IR laser, the polymer matrix absorption rate of laser is less than 15%, and 85% of the energy passes through the polymer matrix to heat the carbon fibers directly. On the other hand, the UV laser energy is absorbed by the resin matrix almost completely (Figure 4a). To this end, the UV laser has a better cutting edge quality compared to IR laser in CFRP cutting, and the HAZ is larger for IR laser than that for UV laser (Figure 4b). According to Xu’s research [47], the absorption rate of infrared light by carbon fibers is close to 80%, and the laser energy is mainly absorbed by carbon fibers, while the matrix is indirectly heated by hot carbon fibers, rather than the laser beam itself. On the other hand, in the ultraviolet wavelength range, the polymer matrix and fibers can absorb the laser well, infrared light can pass through the CFRP epoxy resin. Wolynski cut CFRP with IR and UV lasers and concluded that the cutting quality of ultraviolet light is better than that of IR laser [48]. Qi cut CFRP with 266 nm wavelength lasers and performed a multivariate linear regression analysis on the data, and the empirical formula of CFRP incision width and heat affected zone width was obtained, which provided a reference for laser parameter selection for CFRP laser cutting [49].
Micromachines 14 00024 g004
Figure 4. (a) Material removed mechanism for UV and IR lasers. (b) HAZ for CFRP cutting with IR and UV lasers Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier.
Yun et al. [50] studied IR laser surface treatment and UV laser surface treatment of CFRP laminates under different laser treatment parameters and analyzed their microstructure characteristics and the results of energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The results showed that the thermal effect of IR laser leads to the combustion of carbon fibers, and the UV laser surface treatment without thermal effect ensures the integrity of carbon fibers (Figure 5a–d). Hong et al. [51] studied the IR laser surface treatment and peeling layer treatment of various laser processing parameters. The results showed that the average shear strength of the adhesive joint obtained by IR laser treatment is 20.158 MPa, while the average shear strength of the joint obtained by peeling layer treatment is 32.574 MPa. Yuan et al. [52] proposed a staggered scanning mode (ISM) based on the top-down default sequential scanning mode (SSM) of the multi-layer concentric circle filling scanning process, which improves the surface quality of CFRP plates through nanosecond ultraviolet laser drilling. Compared with SSM, the overall average HAZ width of ISMs is reduced by 25.85% by reducing the heat accumulation effect of adjacent tracks (Figure 5e–f). Yu et al. [53] controlled the scanning speed of UV laser, and the surface of CFRP was completely cleaned and partially cleaned. The results show that the main damage form of CFRP bonded joints obtained by complete and partial UV laser cleaning is mixed damage, in which interface damage and cohesive damage play an important role in the tensile properties of the two types of joints respectively.
Micromachines 14 00024 g005
Figure 5. (a) macromorphology of IR laser cleaning; (b) surface roughness test result detected at marked line-(1); (c) macromorphology of UV laser cleaning; (d) surface roughness test result detected at marked line; Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [50] Copyright 2019, Springer Nature. (e) HAZ with fill scan from inside out method with SSM; (f) HAZ with fill scan from inside out method with ISM (m ¼ 3) Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.

2.2. Effect of Laser Mode and Parameters on CFRP Machining Quality

Both continuous wavelength (CW) laser and pulsed lasers have been applied to machine CFRP [54,55,56][54][55][56]. The CW laser has a high power and can remove material quickly, so the efficiency can be improved about 25%. However, the heat input into the material is large for the CW laser, which is easy to cause thermal damage. In order to reduce the thermal damage in machining CFRP with CW lasers, investigations have been carried out to optimize the machining process. Goeke [57] used CW fiber lasers to cut CFRP and found that both HAZ and seam width decreased significantly with increasing of the laser scanning speed. Klotzbach [58] also confirmed that the HAZ can be reduced greatly by increasing the laser scanning speed. Bluemel [59] studied the effect of machining speed on HAZ width with 6 KW of CW lasers and found that HAZ decreases with increasing of the cutting speed under the given laser power. Rao [60] used a 400 W CW laser to cut CFRP, and investigated the effect of laser power, beam scanning speed and auxiliary gas flow on the cutting quality by using the response surface method. Bluemel [61] applied CW lasers and the pulsed lasers to cut CFRP, and found that the efficiency is higher than the pulsed laser about 25%. However, the short-pulsed laser has the smallest HAZ (Figure 6) and maximum tensile strength is larger than the CW lasers. Riviiro [62,63][62][63] used CO2 lasers with CW and pulsed mode to cut CFRP and studied the effect of processing parameters on incision width, HAZ and cross-sectional quality. Li [64] studied the cutting quality and cutting surface topography of CFRP laminates cutting by CW fiber lasers with single-channel and multi-channel processing paths.
Micromachines 14 00024 g006
Figure 6. (a) Cutting CFRP with picosecond laser (laser power 50 W, Pulse duration 6 ps, cutting speed 15 m/min); (b) nanosecond laser (laser power 750 W, Pulse duration 30 ns, cutting speed 15 m/min); (c) CW lasers (laser power 4000 W, cutting speed 9.1 m/min). Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
Sehyeok et al. [65] studied cutting CFRP sheets using a 2 KW multimode fiber laser (Figure 7). The research results showed that with the increase in laser passing times, the corner width, the matrix evaporation width and the matrix recession width will also increase until cutting through, but once through cutting occurs, they will not change too much. In the process of laser irradiation, the pressure inside the corner edge increases significantly, and the carbon fibers at the corner edge can change into liquid, thus forming a molten section. Wei et al. [66] irradiated CFRP with a high intensity CW laser and proposed a tensile strength prediction model of orthogonal CFRP under CW laser irradiation. It was found that the prediction model can reflect the decreasing process of tensile strength under laser irradiation, especially in the case of high intensity laser irradiation and high tensile load.
Micromachines 14 00024 g007
Figure 7. (a–f) SEM images of the cut surfaces, showing different degrees of fiber fusing Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Jun [67] cut a CFRP-laminated plate overlay structure with fiber lasers and adjusted the processing parameters to study the change of the surface quality of the laminated plate. The results showed that the HAZ level of laser cutting CFRP laminates is highly related to the fiber orientation, laser power and cutting speed (Figure 8a–c). Tao [68] studied and proposed a new double beam dislocation (DBOD) laser drilling technology (Figure 8d). The thickness of CFRP specimen reaches 10 mm by using DBOD process, which is significantly improved compared with other studies. Leone et al. [69] used 150W Nd: YAG pulse laser to cut 1 mm thick CFRP plate. It is found that the laser used can cut CFRP plates with a maximum speed of 12 mm/s (Figure 8e).
Micromachines 14 00024 g008
Figure 8. Optical image of cross section to the cut edge of samples with fiber orientation of (a) +45°/−45°, (b) 0°/90°, and (c) woven Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [67]; Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. (d) Schematic description of pulsed laser coaxial-trepan drilling process by a single-beam Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [68]; Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (e) Examples of kerf geometry Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [69]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
The irradiation time of each pulse is very short for the ultrashort pulse laser relative to the CW laser and the long-pulsed laser. So, there is a sufficient cooling time between two pulses and cutting profile with less thermal damage can be obtained [70,71,72,73][70][71][72][73]. In CFRP cutting with pulsed lasers, the process parameters such as the pulse width, the frequency, and the processing path are the key parameters affecting the cutting quality. Freitag [74] optimized the pulse energy and the repetition rate of the pulsed laser to reduce the width of the HAZ and found that a high cutting quality can be obtained with a high pulse energy and high repetition rate at the same average laser power. Leone [75] cut CFRP with a Yb:YAG pulsed laser, and it was found that a better cutting quality was obtained with multi-channel technology at a higher scanning speed, and the width of HAZ can be reduced significantly. He also [69] used the Nd:YAG laser to cut CFRP and investigated the influence of process parameters on the geometry of the cutting slit and the HAZ at a speed of 12 mm/s. Yang [76] monitored the quality of nanosecond UV laser processing using acoustic emission technology and found that the CFRP laser cutting acoustic emission signal is consistent with the kerf width in both time and frequency domains (Figure 9a). Salama [77] drilled CFRP composites using a 400 W picosecond laser, and studied the influence of laser power, repetition rate, and scanning line distance on material removal efficiency and HAZ. A through-hole with diameter of 6 mm was drilled on a 6 mm thickness CFRP plates using scanning galvanometer ring cutting technology, and it was found that the laser inlet had a small HAZ (<25 μm), but the hole taper angle is larger, which is about 15°, and the processing time is about 3 min (Figure 9b).
Micromachines 14 00024 g009
Figure 9. (a) Cutting CFRP with nanosecond laser (max.7mJ@10 kHz, 30 ns) Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [76]; Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (b) drilling 6 mm diameter hole on a 6 mm thickness CFRP plate with picosecond laser (21 W, 0.5 MHz, 10 Ps) Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature.
Li et al. [78] used a 532 nm nanosecond fiber laser with adjustable pulse duration to drill holes in the CFRP plate. It was found that under the condition of short pulse duration, the HAZ width was narrow, the minimum HAZ width at the edge of the hole inlet was 18.74 µm, and the matrix material near the HAZ was less damaged. Ma et al. [79] used 1064 nanosecond pulse laser to cut CFRP and GFRP materials and compared the propagation speed and breakdown time of the plasma plume. Kumar et al. [80] use a femtosecond laser system to generate the wettability transformation of the surface of CFRP with micro/nano structures. It was found that laser induced periodic surface structure was realized on carbon fiber surface at different defocusing distances and pulse energy (Figure 10).
Micromachines 14 00024 g010
Figure 10. (a) Formation of laser induced periodic surface structure on carbon fiber surface (b) high spatial frequency laser induced periodic surface structure (HSFL)micrograph, and (c) schematic of scanning and beam polarization direction Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [80]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Freitag et al. [81] proposed an approximate analytical expression for the minimum feed rate required to avoid evaporation of the matrix material during the ultra-short pulse processing of CFRP. It was found that the residual heat is related to the pulse energy and pulse repetition rate. Hu et al. [82] used a 355 nm emitting Nd: YVO4 picosecond pulsed laser system to study the effects of milling parameters on surface quality and material removal rate. The results showed that the laser grinding process of CFRP is complex, and the optimized laser power, grinding speed and hatch distance are 11.76 w, 2200 mm/s and 0.015 mm, respectively. Oliveira et al. [83] used a femtosecond laser with a wavelength of 1024 nm and a duration of 550 fs to treat unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy matrix composites. The results showed that a selective removal of epoxy resin and exposure of carbon fibers can be achieved by using appropriate processing parameters (Figure 11a,b). Dittmar et al. [84,85][84][85] studied the effects of pulse overlap, focus diameter and the resulting flux on process quality and processing time. The results showed that the nanosecond pulsed UV laser can process two kinds of fiber-reinforced composites and achieve good surface quality without burn marks or other thermal damage areas (Figure 11c,d).
Micromachines 14 00024 g011
Figure 11. (a,b) SEM images of the central region of laser tracks produced with 0.35 mJ and 5 mm/s Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [83]; Copyright 2017, Elsevier. (c,d) Pictures showing surface topography of GFRP Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [84]. Copyright 2013, Elsevier.
Jiang [86] conducted CFRP cutting experiments using picosecond lasers and studied the influence of laser parameters on cutting quality. The results showed that, when the cutting direction was parallel with the upper carbon fibers, the HAZ is minimal, and when the cutting direction is perpendicular to the upper carbon fiber arrangement, the HAZ is maximum. The HAZ increases with the increasing of the repetition rate, and the cutting efficiency increases 15% firstly and then decreases with the increasing of the cutting speed. Weber [87] studied the influence of different parameters such as the pulse energy and the repetition rate on heat accumulation through analytical models and gave the maximum number of pulses that can be tolerated to avoid thermal influence. Peter [88] performed cutting and punching experiments on CFRP using a nanosecond laser (maximum parameters: 7 MJ, 10 kHz, 30 ns), and obtained a good delamination-free cut seam using a high-speed scanning galvanometer fill processing mode. Jiao [89,90][89][90] used picosecond and nanosecond lasers with a wavelength of 532 nm to cut hole on CFRP plates. The effects of laser rotary cutting, parallel fill cutting and cross-fill cutting on the processing quality at different laser power were analyzed, and the results showed that the laser rotary cutting method had the highest removal efficiency, the smallest taper and the small thermal impact zone on CFRP (Figure 12).
Micromachines 14 00024 g012
Figure 12. (a) CFRP high-speed laser rotary cutting technology with picosecond laser; (b) cutting CFRP for different shapes;(c,d) Micro schematic diagram after cutting. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [90]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
In summary, comparing the CFRP machining quality with CW laser and pulsed laser, CW laser is 25% more efficient, but has a larger thermal effect on CFRP and results in a poor processing quality. So, CW laser is suitable for CFRP machining which require low processing accuracy and high machining efficiency. For pulsed lasers, the HAZ can be effectively reduced on the CFRP surface due to the continuous periodic cooling time between the adjacent pulses. So, it is suitable for the processing CFRP component which requires high-precision and low-damage. Comparing the nanosecond laser and the picosecond laser with different frequencies, it was found that the size of the HAZ decreases with decreasing of the time interval between adjacent pulses and the laser scanning speed. Therefore, a higher machining quality can be obtained for pulsed laser with a shorter pulse duration.

2.3. CFRP Field-Assisted Laser Processing Method

Machining CFRP with energy field-assisted laser machining method can improve the cutting efficiency and quality. The commonly used auxiliary energy fields include airflow fields and water flow fields. Riveiro [91] used a 3 kW CO2 laser to cut a 3 mm thickness CFRP plate with off-axis supersonic nozzles and subsonic nozzles using Ar gas assistant (Figure 13a,b). It was found that the HAZ can be effectively reduced by using of auxiliary gases during the cutting process, but there are some long fibers on the cutting profile. Negarestani [92] found that adding oxygen into the inert gas can accelerate the decomposition of the resin matrix and promote material removal rate. At the same time, the HAZ can be reduced due to the nitrogen cooling in the cutting process. It concluded that the low oxygen volume fraction (typically 12.5%) and 0.8 MPa air pressure are the optimal parameter configurations to improve the quality of laser cutting of CFRP. Ramanujam et al. [93] made micropores on CFRP with carbon dioxide laser, and adjusted input parameters such as laser power, cutting speed and argon pressure. It was found that the cutting speed is the main factor affecting the hot dye area and the edge width, followed by the power. Kononenko et al. [94] used a picosecond laser to cut the depth multipass of bidirectional and unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (CFRP). It is found that the auxiliary oxygen flow can significantly improve the cutting efficiency, and the oxygen support cutting can also solve the problem that occurs when cutting CFRP parallel to the fiber direction, where the angle appears strong deformation and widening (Figure 14). Water jet-guided laser processing technology combines the laser and the water jet, which can reduce the HAZ and increasing cutting depth in CFRP cutting process. Zhang [95] proposed a water jet-assisted cutting method of CFRP, which can greatly reduce the width of the cut slit and the HAZ comparing with the laser direct cutting method. It was found that the width of the seam on the upper surface increases first and then decreases with increasing of the flow rate of the water jet. The HAZ is smaller, and the morphology of the cutting inner wall is better than that of the laser direct cutting. Wu [96] investigated the influencing law of the process parameters such as laser power, CFRP feed speed and water jet speed on the cutting quality, and the influences of carbon fiber arrangement direction and laser cutting path on the CFRP cutting damage mechanism are analyzed (Figure 15). CFRP plates with the thickness of 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm and 10 mm CFRP is realized by adopting the parallel path layered scanning method.
Micromachines 14 00024 g013
Figure 13. (a,b) HAZ of CFRP cutting with different Ar assistant methods Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]; Copyright 2017, Elsevier. (c) HAZ of laser cutting; (d) HAZ of CFRP cutting with water jet guided laser processing technology Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 14 00024 g014
Figure 14. Evolution of kerf depth during multipass cutting of bidirectional CFRP in a chamber with different gas environment (F ¼ 28 J/cm2) Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2014, AIP Publishing.
Micromachines 14 00024 g015
Figure 15. (a) Cutting CFRP with water jet guided laser processing technology; (b) CFRP cutting mechanism and cutting profile Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Hua [98] cut CFRP with a 500 W millisecond Nd:YAG pulsed laser under water. The experiment results showed that the HAZ can be effectively reduced in CFRP laser cutting under water, which due to a large amount of heat can be absorbed by the water in the cutting process. Tangwarodomnukun et al. [98] studied the influence of laser transverse velocity, carbon fiber orientation, water flow rate and flow direction on cutting size and HAZ size. It is found that the use of high water flow rate can limit the expansion of HAZ and also help to remove materials. In addition, the water flow in the transverse direction of the laser can increase the cutting depth (Figure 13c,d). Sun et al. [99] uses three types of water jets to guide laser cutting CFRP. The study found that the characteristics of water jet guided laser cutting CFRP were significantly different from those of dry laser cutting in the case of multiple cutting with parallel path and without parallel path, while in the experiment using the multi pass scanning strategy without parallel path, the cornea was serrated on the side wall. From the above analysis, it can be seen that in the CFRP laser machining process, water-assisted processing, underwater processing and gas-assisted methods can control the extraction of fibers and reduce the accumulation of residual heat in the processing area, so as to achieve a high machining quality.

References

  1. Barile, C.; Casavola, C.; Cililis, F.D. Mechanical comparison of new composite materials for aerospace applications. Compos. Part B 2019, 162, 122–128.
  2. Li, H.L.; Fiore, L.; Jiang, Z. Composite materials for primary aircraft structures: From development phase to high volume production rate. Civ. Aircr. Des. Res. 2020, 1, 125–128.
  3. Liu, S.L.; Chen, T.; Wu, C.Q. Rotary ultrasonic face grinding of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP): A study on cutting force model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 89, 847–856.
  4. Ning, F.D.; Cong, W.L.; Hu, Y.B.; Wang, H. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51, 451–462.
  5. Shi, H.Y.; Yuan, S.M.; Zhang, C.; Chen, B.C.; Li, Q.L.; Li, Z.; Zhu, G.Y.; Qian, J.Q. A cutting force prediction model for rotary ultrasonic side grinding of CFRP composites considering coexistence of brittleness and ductility. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 2403–2414.
  6. Zhang, D.Z.; Wang, H.; Anthony, R.; Cong, W.L. Delamination in rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP composites: Finite element analysis and experimental implementation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 3847–3858.
  7. Criado, V.; Feito, N.; Guisandez, J.L.C.; Diaz-Lvarez, J. A New Cutting Device Design to Study the Orthogonal Cutting of CFRP Laminates at Different Cutting Speeds. Materials 2019, 12, 4074.
  8. Li, H.; Qin, X.D.; Huang, T.; Liu, X.P.; Sun, D.; Jin, Y. Machining quality and cutting force signal analysis in UD-CFRP milling under different fiber orientation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 98, 2377–2387.
  9. Koklu, U.; Morkavuk, S. Cryogenic drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced composite. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2019, 101, 1509–1523.
  10. Sezer, M.; Uğur, K.; Mehmet, B.; Lokman, G. Cryogenic machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites and the effects of cryogenic treatment on tensile properties: A comparative study. Compos. Part B 2018, 147, 1–11.
  11. Wang, H.X.; Zhang, X.H.; Duan, Y.G. Effects of drilling area temperature on drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites due to temperature-dependent properties. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 2943–2951.
  12. Mohsin, A.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Liu, G.J. Assessment of Cutting Performance of Cemented Tungsten Carbide Drills in Drilling Multidirectional T700 CFRP Plate. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2018, 2, 43.
  13. Chen, Y.; Ge, E.D.; Fu, Y.C.; Su, H.H.; Xu, J.H. Review and prospect of drilling technologies for carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2015, 32, 301–306.
  14. Zhang, L.F.; Wang, S.; Qiao, W.L.; Li, Z.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T. High-speed milling of CFRP composites: A progressive damage model of cutting force. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 1005–1015.
  15. Fu, R.; Zhen, Y.J.; Wang, F.J.; Jin, Y.; Sun, D.; Yang, L.J.; Cheng, D. Drill-exit temperature characteristics in drilling of UD and MD CFRP composites based on infrared thermography. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2018, 135, 24–37.
  16. Meltem, A.K.; Hasan, G.K. A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials. Def. Technol. 2018, 14, 318–326.
  17. Prasad, D.; Gayakwad, M.D.; Patil, N.G.; Pawade, R.S.; Thakur, D.G.; Brahmankar, P.K. Experimental Investigations into Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic. J. Compos. 2015, 2015, 9.
  18. Li, M.J.; Lin, X.C.; Yang, X.J.; Wu, H.; Meng, X.M. Study on kerf characteristics and surface integrity based on physical energy model during abrasive waterjet cutting of thick CFRP laminates. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 113, 73–85.
  19. Fermin, B.; Alejandro, S.; Moises, B.; Bartolome, S.; Jorge, S. Study of the surface quality of carbon fiber–reinforced thermoplastic matrix composite (CFRTP) machined by abrasive water jet (AWJM). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 3299–3313.
  20. Alejandro, S.; Fermin, B.; Jorge, S.; Bartolome, S.; Moises, B. Kerf Taper Defect Minimization Based on Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Low Thickness Thermoplastic Carbon Fiber Composites C/TPU. Materials 2019, 12, 4192.
  21. Rishi, P.; Ramulu, M.; Mohamed, H. Surface quality and kerf width prediction in abrasive water jet machining of metal-composite stacks. Compos. Part B 2019, 175, 107134.
  22. Dhiraj, K.; Suhasini, G. Abrasive waterjet machining of Ti/CFRP/Ti laminate and multi-objective optimization of the process parameters using response surface methodology. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 54, 1741–1759.
  23. Alberdi, A.; Artaza, T.; Suárez, A.; Rivero, A.; Girot, F. An experimental study on abrasive waterjet cutting of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks for drilling operations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 86, 691–704.
  24. Alexandru, P.I.; Nicolae, B.; Ioana, P.A. Avoiding carbon fibre reinforced polymer delamination during abrasive water jet piercing: A new piercing method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 119, 1139–1152.
  25. Masoud, F.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ariffin, M.K.A.M.; Nukman, Y.; Bayraktar, E. Experimental analysis of kerf taper angle in cutting process of sugar palm fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites with laser beam and abrasive water jet cutting technologies. Polymers 2021, 13, 2543.
  26. Selzer, R.; Friedrich, K. Mechanical properties and failure behavior of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites under the influence of moisture. Compos. Part A 1997, 28, 595–604.
  27. El-Hofy, M.; Helmy, M.O.; Escobar-Palafox, G.; Kerrigan, K.; Scaife, R.; El-Hofy, H. Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Multidirectional CFRP Laminates. Procedia CIRP 2018, 68, 535–540.
  28. Shanmugam, D.K.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, J. A study of delamination on graphite/epoxy composites in abrasive waterjet machining. Compos. Part A 2008, 39, 923–929.
  29. Azmir, M.A.; Ahsan, A.K. A study of abrasive water jet machining process on glass/epoxy composite laminate. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 6168–6173.
  30. Li, Z.C.; Jiao, Y.; Deines, T.W.; Pei, Z.J.; Treadwell, C. Rotory ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: Feasibility study and designed experiments. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2005, 45, 1402–1411.
  31. Ning, F.D.; Cong, W.L.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.B.; Hu, Z.L.; Pei, Z.J. Surface grinding of CFRP composites with rotary ultrasonic machining: A mechanistic model on cutting force in the feed direction. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 1217–1229.
  32. Cong, W.L.; Pei, Z.J.; Feng, Q.; Deines, T.W.C. Rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP: A comparison with twist drilling. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2012, 31, 313–321.
  33. Xu, W.X.; Zhang, L.C.; Wu, Y.B. Elliptic vibration—Assisted cutting of fibre reinforced polymer composites: Understanding the material removal mechanisms. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 92, 103–111.
  34. Sulaiman, F.A.; Yilabas, B.S.; Ahsan, M.M. Laser hole drilling of composites and steel workpieces. Lasers Eng. 2014, 16, 105–120.
  35. Leone, C.; Genna, S.; Tagliaferri, V. Fibre laser cutting of CFRP thin sheets by multi-passes scan technique. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2014, 53, 43–50.
  36. El-Hofy, M.H.; El-Hofy, H. Laser beam machining of carbon fiber reinforced composites: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 101, 2965–2975.
  37. Fischer, F.; Romolli, L.; Kling, R. Laser based repair of carbon fiber reinforced plastics. CIRP Ann. 2010, 59, 203–206.
  38. Herzog, D.; Jaeschke, P.; Meier, O.; Haferkamp, H. Investigations on the thermal effect caused by laser cutting with respect to static strength of CFRP. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2008, 48, 1464–1473.
  39. Mishra, Y.K.; Mishra, S.; Jayswal, S.C. Parametric Analysis and Optimization of Inclined Laser Percussion Drilling of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Using Solid-State Nd: YAG Laser. Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process. 2021, 8, 325–354.
  40. Canel, T.; Kayahan, E.; Sinmazcelik, T. Laser process parameter optimization of dimple created on oriented carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 4029–4043.
  41. Webber, R.; Hafaner, M.; Michalowski, A.; Graf, T. Minimum damage in CFRP laser processing. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 302–307.
  42. Pagano, N.; Ascari, A.; Loverrani, E.; Donati, L.; Campana, G.; Fortunato, A. Laser interaction with carbon fibre reinforced polymers. Procedia CIRP 2015, 33, 423–427.
  43. Wu, C.W.; Wu, X.Q.; Huang, C.G. Ablation behaviors of carbon reinforced polymer composites by laser of different operation modes. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 73, 23–28.
  44. Zhou, L.; Huang, P.; Jiao, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Z. Study on mechanism of spray-mist-assisted laser processing of carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 158, 108821.
  45. Joost, S.; Saeid, H.; Gaǽtan, P.; Van Wim, P.; Mathias, K. Enhanced low power vibrothermography of impacted CFRP through in-plane local defect resonances. Proc. Meet. Acoust. 2019, 38, 065003.
  46. Takaha, S.K.; Tsukamoto, M.; Masuno, S.; Sato, Y. Heat conduction analysis of laser CFRP processing with IR and UV laser light. Compos. Part A 2016, 84, 114–122.
  47. Xu, H.B.; Hu, J.; Yu, Z. Absorption behavior analysis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer in laser processing. Opt. Mater. Express 2015, 5, 2330–2336.
  48. Wolynski, A.; Herrmann, T.; Mucha, P. Laser ablation of CFRP using picosecond laser pulses at different wavelengths from UV to IR. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 292–301.
  49. Qi, L.T.; Liu, F.C.; Zhang, Y.D. Experimental investigation on 266nm ultraviolet solid-state laser cutting of carbon fiber reinforced plastics. Laser Technol. 2022, 46, 402–407.
  50. Li, Y.; Zhan, X.H.; Gao, C.Y.; Wang, H.G.; Yang, Y. Comparative study of infrared laser surface treatment and ultraviolet laser surface treatment of CFRP laminates. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 102, 4059–4071.
  51. Zhan, X.H.; Li, Y.; Gao, C.Y.; Wang, H.G.; Yang, Y. Effect of infrared laser surface treatment on the microstructure and properties of adhesively CFRP bonded joints. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 106, 398–409.
  52. Li, W.Y.; Zhang, G.J.; Huang, Y.; Rong, Y.M. UV laser high-quality drilling of CFRP plate with a new interlaced scanning mode. Compos. Struct. 2021, 273, 114258.
  53. Gao, Q.Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.G.; Liu, W.P.; Shen, H.L.; Zhan, X.H. Effect of Scanning Speed with UV Laser Cleaning on Adhesive Bonding Tensile Properties of CFRP. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2019, 26, 1087–1099.
  54. Wang, S.Q.; Jesse, E.; Luis, T.; Kiana, P.; Xiang, L.Z.; Liu, Y.T. Ultrahigh Resolution Pulsed Laser-Induced Photoacoustic Detection of Multi-Scale Damage in CFRP Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2106.
  55. Loutas, T.H.; Sotiriadis, G.; Tsonos, E.; Psarras, S.; Kostopoulos, V. Investigation of a pulsed laser ablation process for bonded repair purposes of CFRP composites via peel testing and a design-of-experiments approach. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 95, 102407.
  56. Toyama, N.; Yamamoto, T.; Tsuda, H. Ultrasonic inspection of adhesively bonded CFRP/aluminum joints using pulsed laser scanning. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2019, 28, 27–35.
  57. Goeke, A.; Emmelmann, C. Influence of laser cutting parameters on CFRP part quality. Phys. Procedia 2010, 5, 253–258.
  58. Klotzbach, A.; Hauser, M.; Beyer, E. Laser cutting of carbon fiber reinforced polymers using highly brilliant laser beam sources. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 572–577.
  59. Bluemel, S.; Jaeschke, P.; Wippo, V.; Bastick, S.; Haferkamp, H. Laser machining of CFRP using a high power fiber laser—Investigations on the heat affected zone. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, 24–28 June 2012.
  60. Rao, S.; Sethi, A.; Das, A.K.; Mandal, N.; Kiran, P. Fiber laser cutting of CFRP composites and process optimization through response surface methodology. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2017, 32, 1612–1621.
  61. Bluemel, S.; Jaeschke, P.; Suttmann, O.; Overmeyer, L. Comparative study of achievable quality cutting carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastics using continuous wave and pulsed laser sources. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 1143–1152.
  62. Riveiro, A.; Quintero, F.; Lusquiños, F.; Delval, J.; Comesana, R.; Boutinguiza, M.; Pou, J. Experimental study on the CO2 laser cutting of carbon fiber reinforced plastic composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1400–1409.
  63. Kumar, D.; Gururaja, S. Investigation of hole quality in drilled Ti/CFRP/Ti laminates using CO 2 laser. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 126, 106130.
  64. Li, M.J.; Li, S.; Yang, X.J.; Zhang, Z.C. Fiber laser cutting of CFRP laminates with single and multi-pass strategy: A feasibility study. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 107, 443–453.
  65. Sehyeok, O.; Inyong, L.; Park, Y.B.; Hyungson, K. Investigation of cut quality in fiber laser cutting of CFRP. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 113, 129–140.
  66. Wang, J.W.; Zhu, Y.X.; Wei, C.H.; Lv, Y.W.; Ma, Z.L.; Wang, L.J.; Feng, G.B. Tensile strength prediction of orthogonal CFRP under high intensity CW laser irradiation. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 105304.
  67. Li, M.J.; Li, S.; Yang, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Z.C. Effect of lay-up configuration and processing parameters on surface quality during fiber laser cutting of CFRP laminates. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 623–635.
  68. Tao, N.R.; Chen, G.Y.; Yu, T.Y.; Li, W.; Fan, L.C. Dual-beam laser drilling process for thick carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites plates. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2019, 281, 116590.
  69. Leone, C.; Genna, S. Heat affected zone extension in pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting of CFRP. Compos. Part B 2018, 140, 174–182.
  70. Kononenko, V.I.; Konov, T. Graf. Residual heat generated during laser processing of CFRP with picosecond laser pulses. Adv. Opt. Technol. 2018, 7, 157–163.
  71. Rodolfo, L.; Frank, P.; John, C.; William, Y.; James, F.G. Surface characterization of carbon fiber reinforced polymers by picosecond laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2018, 140, 5–12.
  72. Sato, Y.; Tsukamoto, M.; Abe, N. Thermal effect on CFRP ablation with a 100-W class pulse fiber laser using a PCF amplifier. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 417, 250–255.
  73. Jiang, H.; Ma, C.W.; Li, M.; Cao, Z.L. Femtosecond Laser Drilling of Cylindrical Holes for Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites. Molecules 2021, 26, 2953.
  74. Freitag, C.; Onuseit, V.; Weber, R.; Graf, T. High-speed observation of the heat flow in CFRP during laser processing. Phys. Procedia 2012, 39, 171–178.
  75. Li, X.; Hou, W. Investigation on the Continuous Wave Mode and the ms Pulse Mode Fiber Laser Drilling Mechanisms of the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite. Polymers 2020, 12, 706.
  76. Yang, R.; Huang, Y.; Rong, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, W.; Chen, L. Evaluation and classification of CFRP kerf width by acoustic emission in nanosecond laser cutting. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 152, 108165.
  77. Salama, A.; Li, L.; Mativenga, P. High-power picosecond laser drilling/machining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Appl. Phys. A 2016, 122, 73.
  78. Li, W.Y.; Zhang, G.J.; Huang, Y.; Rong, Y.M. Drilling of CFRP plates with adjustable pulse duration fiber laser. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2021, 36, 1256–1263.
  79. Ma, Y.; Xin, C.; Zhang, W.; Jin, G.Y. Experimental Study of Plasma Plume Analysis of Long Pulse Laser Irradiates CFRP and GFRP Composite Materials. Crystals 2021, 11, 545.
  80. Dhiraj, K.; Gerhard, L.; Suhasini, G. Formation of sub-wavelength laser induced periodic surface structure and wettability transformation of CFRP laminates using ultra-fast laser. Mater. Lett. 2020, 276, 128282.
  81. Freitag, C.; Kononenko, T.V.; Weber, R.; Konov, V.I.; Graf, T. Influence of pulse repetition rate and pulse energy on the heat accumulation between subsequent laser pulses during laser processing of CFRP with ps pulses. Appl. Phys. A 2018, 124, 479.
  82. Hu, J.; Zhu, D.Z. Investigation of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics Machining Using 355 nm Picosecond Pulsed Laser. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 589–600.
  83. Oliveira, V.; Sharma, S.P.; Vilar, R. Vilar. Surface treatment of CFRP composites using femtosecond laser radiation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2017, 94, 37–43.
  84. Dittmar, H.; Gäbler, F.; Stute, U. UV-laser Ablation of Fibre Reinforced Composites with Ns-Pulses. Phys. Procedia 2013, 41, 266–275.
  85. Wang, Y.F.; Hu, J.; Li, K.M. Defect control strategy of carbon fiber reinforced polymer during nanosecond ultraviolet laser processing. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 085608.
  86. Jiang, Y.; Chen, G.Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y. Research of carbon fiber reinforced plastic cut by picosecond laser. Laser Technol. 2017, 41, 821–825.
  87. Weber, R.; Freitag, C.; Kononenko, T.V.; Hafner, M.; Onuseit, V.; Berger, P.; Graf, T. Short-pulse laser processing of CFRP. Phys. Procedia 2012, 39, 137–146.
  88. Peter, J.; Klaus, S.; Stefan, B.; Overmeyer, L. Cutting and drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) by 70W short pulse nanosecond laser. Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2014, 89630, 89630S.
  89. Xu, J.; Jing, C.; Jiao, J.; Sun, S.; Sheng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, H.; Zeng, K. Experimental Study on Carbon Fiber reinforced composites cutting with nanosecond laser. Materials 2022, 15, 6686.
  90. Ouyang, W.T.; Jiao, J.K.; Xu, Z.F.; Sheng, L.Y. Experimental study on CFRP drilling with the picosecond laser “double rotation” cutting technique. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 142, 107238.
  91. Riveiro, A.; Quintero, F.; Lusquinos, F.; Comesa, R.; Boutinguiza, M.; Pou, J. Laser cutting of carbon fiber composite materials. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 388–395.
  92. Negarestani, R.; Li, L.; Sezer, H.K. Nanosecond pulsed DPSS Nd:YAG laser cutting of CFRP composites with mixed reactive and inert gases. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 49, 553–566.
  93. Ramanujam, N.; Dhanabalan, S.; Raj, K.D.; Jeyaprakash, N. Investigation of micro-hole quality in drilled CFRP laminates through Co2 laser. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 7557–7575.
  94. Kononenko, T.V.; Freitag, C.; Komlenok, M.S.; Onuseit, V.; Weber, R.; Graf, T.; Konov, V.I. Oxygen-assisted multipass cutting of carbon fiber reinforced plastics with ultra-short laser pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 103107.
  95. Zhang, C.; Yuan, G.F.; Cong, Q.D.; Gguo, B.C. Study of the water jet assisted laser cutting carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites. Laser J. 2018, 39, 68–71.
  96. Wu, Y.W.; Zhang, G.Y.; Wang, J.X.; Chao, Y.; Zhang, W.W. The cutting process and damage mechanism of large thickness CFRP based on water jet guided laser processing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 141, 107140.
  97. Viboon, T.; Ketsada, K.; Huan, Q. Investigation into laser machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic in a flowing water layer. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 3629–3645.
  98. Hua, Y.Q.; Xiao, T.; Xue, Q.; Liu, H.X.; Chen, R.F. Experimental study about laser cutting of carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Laser Technol. 2013, 37, 565–570.
  99. Sun, D.; Han, F.Z.; Ying, W.S. The experimental investigation of water jet–guided laser cutting of CFRP. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 102, 719–729.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback