1. HCV Infection: Epidemiology and Pathogenesis
To date, HCV infection remains a major global health issue. Estimates from the WHO count more than 58 million people having a chronic HCV infection, with a further 1.5 million new infections occurring every year
[1]. The same estimates report almost 300,000 deaths due to HCV complications, such as liver cirrhosis (LC) or cancer
[1]. Regions with the highest burden of disease are the Mediterranean areas, Southeast Asia, Africa, and some regions of the Americas
[1].
HCV is a blood-borne RNA virus, lacking a proofreading activity during its replication, which thereby increases the likelihood of viral mutations and pathogenicity
[16][2]. There are eight main genotypes and numerous subtypes, whose prevalence is largely geographically differentiated. HCV1 is very common across Europe and the United States, whereas HCV2, HCV4, and HCV5 genotypes are very common in African countries, and HCV2 and HCV6 are mainly predominant in Asia
[17][3]. HCV7 is responsible for less than 1% of total HCV infections, and HCV8 was identified for the first time in patients living in Canada
[5][4].
HCV transmission occurs by four main routes: blood transfusion, sharing of unsafe needles, syringes among intravenous drug users, unprotected sexual intercourse, and vertical transmission
[18][5]. Although transmission by the vertical route and blood products significantly decreased over the last few decades, it is increasing among those who experience unprotected sex (especially among men who have sex with men) and intravenous drug abusers
[19][6]. The risk of transmission is further increased by the presence of other viral or bacterial sexually transmitted infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis, and gonorrhoea
[19][6].
The possible evolution of HCV primary infection is related mainly to viral characteristics and host factors
[20][7]. In most cases, primary infection is asymptomatic or has a non-specific onset symptomatology, whereas only a minority of acute cases are serious, leading, in the worst-case scenario, to fulminant hepatitis
[21][8]. In 15–25% of cases the infection clears spontaneously, whereas in 75–85% it becomes chronic, especially in subjects who have some risk factors (e.g., HIV co-infection) for the inability of the immune system to clear it
[21][8]. This also happens for the ability of HCV to counteract the retinoic acid-inducible gene-1 (RIG-1) pathway and to evade the immune challenge
[22,23][9][10]. Liver disease progression is still being debated and seems to be related to specific host risk factors, such as age or alcohol abuse
[24][11]. Although HCV has a major liver tropism, chronic infection may result in systemic disease involving several other systems
[6][12]. It is often associated with weight loss, fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms (such as depression), lympho-prolypherative disorders (e.g., B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma), renal diseases, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis
[6][12]. HCV pathogenesis is associated with viral variability. The HCV3 genotype, inducing lipid accumulation, is significantly associated with steatosis compared to the HCV1 genotype
[25][13]. The HCV1b subtype is capable of establishing chronic viral infection, while both HCV1 and HCV2 genotypes enhance the risk of kidney disease
[5,26][4][14].
2. HCV Infection Effect on the Gut–Liver Axis
The gut–liver axis represents the link between the gut microbiota and the liver, where both communicate via the portal vein, systemic circulation, and biliary tract
[30][15]. The portal vein provides about 70% of the blood to the liver, transporting nutrients and metabolites from the gut to the liver
[31][16]. However, this route also transports toxic products such as: peptidoglycans, endotoxins or intact bacteria, which may disrupt the liver’s metabolic functions
[32][17]. Furthermore, the liver is responsible for bile acid (BAs) synthesis from cholesterol via 17 liver enzymes which are secreted in the biliary tract and reach the small intestine via the duodenum, combining with other components along the biliary tract and enabling the emulsification, digestion, and absorption of dietary fats. BAs are known to be significant regulators of lipid metabolism, glucose and energy homeostasis and are also involved in the regulation and communication of the gut–liver axis
[33][18]. Approximately 95% of bile acids are reabsorbed at the terminal ileum level and return to the liver via the hepatic portal vein (the enterohepatic circulation)
[34][19]. The residual 5% of BAs are deconjugated, dehydroxylated, and dehydrogenated by the colonic microbiota and progress to secondary bile acids (deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, and ursodeoxycholic acid) that arrive at the liver and subsequently the portal circulation through passive absorption
[35][20]. This conversion is mediated by different gut bacteria, mainly
Clostridiales [36][21]. Bile acids have several roles: food digestion, integrity of the gut mucosa, and antimicrobial activity against pathogens
[37][22].
HCV alters the pathophysiology of the liver and decreases bile production, which is reflected in pro-inflammatory bacterial overgrowth and in the microbial community
[40][23]. BA dysregulation plays an important role in the progression of cirrhosis to liver cancer
[41][24]. HCV infection induces an unfavorable gut microenvironment and the reduction of
Ruminococcaceae and
Lachnospiraceae, which produce fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) crucial to maintaining metabolic homeostasis, integrity of the intestinal barrier and differentiation of Treg cells
[15,42][25][26]. On the other hand, HCV infects gut B-lymphocytes decreasing IgA levels and increasing intestinal permeability, thereby allowing bacterial translocation
[43][27]. The increase in intestinal permeability and the transition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-generated liver inflammatory reactions through TLR4, promotes HCC progression, especially in subjects with chronic alcohol consumption
[44][28]. High levels of cytokines, IgA and T cells during chronic HCV infection can control the gut community diversity; in particular, the abundance of
Prevotella appears to be related to inflammatory mediator IL-17
[45][29].
3. Gut Microbiota and HCV Therapy
Until 2011, PEGylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) led to sustained virological response (SVR) with a success rate of about 54–56% in HCV patients. HCV genotype/subtype was a predictive parameter for SVR
[49][30]. In the last nine years, anti-HCV therapy has improved due to the availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs, which replaced in clinical practice the standard of care (SOC) treatment
[50][31]. The NS3/4A, NS5A, and NS5B polymerase nonstructural proteins (NSs) are the direct targets of therapy
[7][32]. NSs are important for viral replication, NS3 protease, and its cofactor NS4A, which catalyzes cleavage of viral polyprotein. NS5B is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). NS5A contributes to viral replication and interacts with IFN-alpha protein kinase
[51][33]. Approximately 5% of DAA treated patients do not achieve SVR due to resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) specific for each genotype/subtype. RASs can be selected by drug pressure on genomic target regions
[52][34].
Recently, to avoid impact of treatment, the gut microbiota in a cohort of naïve patients was analyzed at the time of diagnosis. In contrast with previous literature, HCV infection in treatment-naive patients was associated with increased diversity of microbiota and the depletion of
Bacteroidetes phyla and
Streptococcus genus
[12][35]. These contrasting results are probably due to the stages of disease analyzed, antiviral treatment, HCV genotypes, and demographic characteristics of the cohort. However, HCV-associated dysbiosis could be mitigated by modulating the gut microbial community to prevent a more severe illness
[12][35].
4. Gut Microbiota and Therapeutic Manipulation
HCV eradication achieving SVR improves inflammation and intestinal dysbiosis in the majority of treated patients. Current DAA therapy could be potentiated in order to improve control of extrahepatic and liver-associated complications, by using probiotics, prebiotics, or an appropriate diet
[12,46][35][36]. Dietary food intake is the first cause of changes in the intestinal flora. Gut microbiota can rapidly change its composition under specific dietary pressure. An animal-based diet, for instance, decreases the abundance of
Firmicutes and increases the prevalence of bile-tolerant microorganisms
[58][37].
The effects of probiotics and prebiotics are mainly reported in animal models. Probiotics have a beneficial effect on liver disease,
Lactobacillus casei reduces plasma levels of LPS-binding protein (LBP).
Bifidobacterium decreases fat accumulation in the liver. In patients with LC, a combination of
Lactobacillus spp.,
Bifidobacterium spp., and
Streptococcus spp. is effective in preventing secondary hepatic encephalopathy
[59][38]. The prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs) restore gut microbiota composition and intestinal barrier function. Lactulose increases the growth of
Bifidobacterium and decreases LPS in serum
[59][38]. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is able to improve gut dysbiosis and reduce hospitalization in patients with LC
[60][39]. In addition, FMT following rifaximin antibiotic therapy could remove
S. salivarius and increase abundance of healthy microbiome for patients in broad clinical stages. Rifaximin reduces endotoxemia, secondary bile acids, and harmful metabolite levels
[61][40]. To cure dysbiosis by using classical approaches, next-generation phage therapy has been proposed. Clinical trials are underway to reduce pathogenic bacterial species in the gut community
[62][41].