Genetics of Parathyroid Carcinoma: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Catherine Yang and Version 1 by Sung Hye Kong.

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare endocrine malignancy that accounts for less than 1% of parathyroid tumors. Parathyroid carcinoma is a rare disease that needs an additional diagnostic tool and wide therapeutic options. The genomics and proteomics approach may help to find the tools to improve the prognosis of the disease by early detection and metastatic control. 

  • parathyroid
  • cancer
  • genomics
  • proteomics

1. CDC73

Germline mutation of CDC73, also known as HRPT2, is responsible for a rare autosomal dominant disorder, Hyperparathyroidism Jaw-Tumor syndrome (HPT-JT), characterized by multiple benign or malignant tumors in parathyroid, kidney, uterus, and jaw bones [11][1]. CDC73 encodes a protein of 531 amino acids termed parafibromin, named due to the relationship to parathyroid and fibro-osseous lesions found in HPT-JT patients [11][1]. In these patients, the lifetime risk of PC is about 20%, implying a strong association between the pathophysiology and the mutation [11][1].
Subsequently, researchers focused on discovering CDC73 mutations in sporadic PC patients. Somatic mutations of the CDC73 gene have become the most established genetic alteration in PC [12][2]. Biallelic loss-of-function mutations of the CDC73 tumor suppressor gene are major genetic drivers and found in 9% to 70% of sporadic PCs [13[3][4],14], while they were found in <1% of benign parathyroid adenomas [15][5]. The percentage of CDC73 mutation among PC varies among studies; some reported ~70% had the mutation, while others reported only ~9% [16][6]. Considering the extreme rarity and different prevalence of PCs, the discordance among the studies may be due to selection bias and ethnic differences.
The CDC73 mutations are of a missense nature due to frameshift mutations or premature truncations in conserved regions. The mutations can inactivate human polymerase-associated factor 1 (hPAF1) or nuclear localization signals (NLSs) of parafibromin. In addition to inactivating mutations, loss of heterogeneity in the CDC73 gene locus and hypermethylation of the CDC73 promoter region have also been found as somatic events of PCs [17,18][7][8]. In a recent whole genome sequencing study, CDC73 mutations were found in 39% of patients, and 8% had copy number variations of CDC73 [19][9].
The CDC73 gene is ubiquitously expressed, and the encoded parafibromin is an evolutionarily conserved protein. It is a member of the hPAF regulatory complex to regulate transcriptional activity by histone-modifying and chromatic remodeling (Table 1) [20][10]. It has been reported to be associated with tumor-suppressive properties since most tumors with CDC73 mutations had a loss of parafibromin expression, and functional in vitro studies showed an anti-proliferative effect of the wild-type parafibromin [21,22][11][12]. In addition, parafibromin has been reported to regulate cyclin D1.
Table 1.
Major biological functions of wild-type parafibromin protein.
Protein Localization The Function of the Protein
Nucleus A member of the PAF1 complex, functioning as a transcriptional regulator by histone-modifying and chromatic remodeling [20][10]
  Tumor suppressor, involved in cell cycle progression by regulating cyclin D1/PRAD1 expression and the Wnt pathway, potentially downregulating β-catenin and c-Myc [21][11]
  Has a role in nuclear localization since the N-terminal of parafibromin contains a highly conserved functional monopartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) [19][9]
Cytoplasm Interacts with the actin-binding proteins, actinin-2 and actinin-3, which are involved in cytoskeletal structure organization [23][13]
Clinically, as a confident diagnosis of PC is a challenging task, parafibromin immunohistochemistry has been suggested to help diagnose equivocal cases. In previous studies, loss of nuclear expression of parafibromin was a distinguishable feature between PC and adenoma [14][4], showing sensitivity and specificity of 75~90% and >90% with a kappa value of 0.9. However, there were also reports that parafibromin may not be enough to distinguish PC since only 46% of PCs showed negative staining of parafibromin [24][14]. The discrepancy among studies could be related to selection bias, differences in retrieval and antibodies, and different criteria for assessing reactivity. Despite these discrepancies, the loss of parafibromin nuclear staining is a useful marker that can support the diagnosis of PC in confusing cases. Additional markers for the definite diagnosis of PC-such as loss of APC expression have been suggested, although attempts to find more markers and further validation for potential markers are needed.

2. PRUNE2 Gene

The PRUNE2 gene was reported to be associated with PC [10][15]. PRUNE2 protein is known as a tumor suppressor, suppressing Ras homolog family member An activity that leads to inhibiting oncogenic transformation. In a recent whole exome sequencing study, 18% of PC patients had the PRUNE2 mutation, while none of the parathyroid adenoma patients had [10][15], suggesting that the PRUNE2 gene could be a potentially oncogenic gene alteration. In previous cases, somatic nonsense mutations of the PRUNE2 gene were found along with the CDC73 mutation, implying a synergic effect of tumor suppressors—PRUNE2 and CDC73—may contribute to carcinogenesis [9][16]. It was previously reported that three missense mutations of the PRUNE2 gene were likely pathogenic by inhibiting the function of the PRUNE2 protein [10][15]. The nonsense mutations were likely to produce a truncated PRUNE2 protein without a BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain to lose control of cellular transformation by losing its tumor suppressor function. However, in another study, only 1 case among 25 PC cases harbored previously identified somatic mutations of PRUNE2. Therefore, further studies with whole PRUNE2 gene sequencing on larger cases of PCs are needed to confirm the exact prevalence of the PRUNE2 mutation.

3. CCND1 Gene

CCND1, which encodes cyclin D1, was reported to act as an oncogene in parathyroid adenoma through PTH-CCND1 rearrangement. It has been observed that cyclin D1 was more significantly overexpressed in parathyroid adenomas and carcinomas than in the normal parathyroid [25][17]. It has also been reported that mRNA and protein expression levels were higher in PCs than in adenomas [26][18]. In previous genomic studies, CCND1 amplification was observed in 71–90% of PCs [9,26][16][18]. As a mechanism, it has been suggested that the loss of parafibromin may cause overexpression of cyclin D1 and thus activate cell proliferation [21][11]. However, interestingly, in a recent report, 80% of cases with CCND1 amplification were mutually exclusive of CDC73 somatic mutations, suggesting that CCND1 amplification could be an alternative mechanism of CDC73 inactivation to upregulate CCND1 expression [9][16]. As CCND1 overexpression is also frequently found in parathyroid adenomas, other concurrent mutations in PC may synergize and lead to a malignant phenotype.

4. MEN1 Gene

Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 syndrome (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene [27][19]. In MEN1 syndrome, 99% of cases are benign parathyroid adenomas or hyperplasia, and only 1% of them were reported as PC or atypical parathyroid adenomas [28,29][20][21]. Although somatic MEN1 mutations are reported to be infrequent in PCs, two genomic profiling studies found genetic alterations in the MEN1 gene in 13–31% of cases, suggesting MEN1-caused development of PCs as a cause of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism may be more prevalent than initially thought [7,30][22][23]. Interestingly, unlike CDC73-mutated cases, all MEN1-mutated cases had definite single allele loss of heterogeneity (LOH) or copy number neutral LOH, implying that biallelic inactivation of the MEN1 gene is a mandatory step for carcinogenesis [7][22].

5. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway-Related Genes

The PI3K/AKT and mTOR signaling pathways are critical in cell growth and survival in physiological and pathological conditions, including cancer. Therefore, the pathway, frequently activated in various cancers, has been considered a potential therapeutic target. The pathway contributes to oncogenic transformation by regulating cell cycle progression, survival, suppression of autophagy, and senescence [31][24]. Activation of the pathway leads to increase cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastatic potential [32][25]. Clinically, it was reported that PIK3CA and PTEN mutation, which may activate the pathway, were among the top three mutated genes in a meta-analysis of 21 types of cancer [33][26].
In PC, genetic alterations that can activate the pathway—such as PTEN, mTOR, and PIK3CA—were found in 13–20% of patients [7[15][16][22][27],8,9,10], representing a major pathogenic pathway and a potential therapeutic target for PCs. In previous studies, PIK3CA mutations were mutually exclusive from CDC73 mutations, suggesting that they could both be oncogenic but act independently [9][16]. Further, an activated PIK3CA mutation without a CDC73 mutation was reported in a PC case, consistent with other reports of mutual exclusivity of PIK3CA and CDC73 mutation [8][27]. Moreover, mTOR gene mutations were found in PCs, mutually exclusive from PIK3CA mutations in a study, but further supporting studies are needed [9][16].
As the activation of the pathway could be one of the main oncogenic pathogeneses of PC, it has been suggested that modulating the axis by using PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors could be helpful in the subset of patients [34][28]. However, PC is too rare to conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial to prove the efficacy of the inhibitors. Therefore, to overcome the rarity of the disease, as in other rare cancers, the routine evaluation of genetic alteration in PC and considering the basket trials for the disease may help improve the outcomes. ‘Basket trial’ means a trial design in which the targeted treatment is examined in multiple diseases with common molecular alterations. Furthermore, PIK3CA/mTOR mutations may help diagnose PC before the surgical resection, although the prevalence of the mutations in parathyroid adenomas needs to be assessed in further studies.

6. Wnt Signaling Pathway-Related Genes

The Wnt signaling pathway is known to regulate various cellular events, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and survival. Aberrant activation of Wnt signaling and accumulation in the cytoplasm and nucleus plays a role in the pathogenesis of various cancer types [35][29]. The pathway has also been reported as a potential oncogenic pathway in PC. Although CDC73 has been reported to regulate the Wnt signaling pathway by stabilizing β-catenin, genetic and epigenetic changes in APC and RNF43 genes have been identified as another key regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway [9,36][16][30]. In a previous study of five cases of PC, all tumor tissues of five cases showed increased nonphosphorylated active β-catenin accumulation compared to adjacent normal parathyroid tissue [36][30]. They suggested that the activation of the Wnt pathway is likely due to a loss in expression of the APC gene caused by promoter DNA methylation. Inactivating somatic mutations of the APC gene in a study by Pandya et al. implied the importance of Wnt signaling in the carcinogenesis of parathyroid tissue, as in other cancer types [9][16]. APC is one of the members of the β-catenin destruction complex to target β-catenin for proteasomal degradation [36][30]. When the APC function is lost, β-catenin translocates into the nucleus to promote proliferation by activating S-phase regulators, including c-myc and cyclin D1. Therefore, mutations of the APC gene causing Wnt signaling dysregulation are well known as a first-hit mechanism and found in 10–80% of colorectal carcinomas, as well as in other cancer types [37,38,39][31][32][33].
Inactivating the mutation of the RNF43 gene was also reported in PC, which is another key regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway [9][16]. RNF43 encodes E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that acts as a negative regulator of the pathway by mediating the ubiquitination, endocytosis, and subsequent degradation of Wnt receptor complex components Frizzled [40][34]. The protein acts on canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways [40][34]. Like the APC gene mutation, the RNF43 mutation was frequently found in colorectal and endometrial carcinomas [41][35]. Interestingly, mutations of RNF43 are mutually exclusive to APC mutations in colorectal carcinomas [41][35], as found in a previous study of PCs [9][16]. However, somatic mutations of these genes have only been reported in a small number of cases of PC. Further studies focusing on the genes related to the Wnt pathway are needed.

7. Other Mutations

Somatic inactivating TERT gene mutations were reported in sporadic PCs. The TERT gene encodes the telomerase catalytic subunit, which regulates transcriptional regulation, the foremost limiting step in telomerase activity [42][36]. In 2013, two hotspot mutations were discovered in the TERT promoter in over 70% of melanomas [43][37]. Interestingly, the same hotspot mutations were found in PC cases [7][22], implying the possibility of impaired telomerase activity as one of the major oncogenic pathogeneses.
AKAP9 gene encodes a member of the A-kinase anchor proteins that regulate cellular localization and function of protein kinase A. The somatic biallelic inactivation mutations were reported in 17% of PCs [9][16]. The biallelic inactivation implies the  loss of a putative tumor suppressor activity and subsequent loss of function of protein kinase A, which may lead to parathyroid carcinogenesis.
Heterozygote somatic mutations of ZEB1 were also reported in PCs [9][16]. It encodes a zinc finger transcription factor that plays a role in repressing the E-cadherin promoter and including epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The activation of the gene may promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, tumor progression, and metastasis.
Somatic biallelic truncating mutations of the FAT3 gene were reported in 10% of PCs, encoding a member of the atypical cadherin family [9][16]. Although the protein’s function is yet unknown, the biallelic truncating mutations imply the loss of a putative tumor suppressor activity. Further elucidating studies are needed in FAT3 gene mutation.

References

  1. Cristina, E.-V.; Alberto, F. Management of familial hyperparathyroidism syndromes: MEN1, MEN2, MEN4, HPT-Jaw tumour, Familial isolated hyperparathyroidism, FHH, and neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 32, 861–875.
  2. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Adikaram, P.R.; Welch, J.; Guan, B.; Weinstein, L.S.; Chen, H.; Simonds, W.F. Genotype of CDC73 germline mutation determines risk of parathyroid cancer. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2020, 27, 483–494.
  3. Marcocci, C.; Cetani, F.; Rubin, M.R.; Silverberg, S.J.; Pinchera, A.; Bilezikian, J.P. Parathyroid carcinoma. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1869–1880.
  4. Uljanovs, R.; Sinkarevs, S.; Strumfs, B.; Vidusa, L.; Merkurjeva, K.; Strumfa, I. Immunohistochemical Profile of Parathyroid Tumours: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6981.
  5. Gill, A.J.; Lim, G.; Cheung, V.K.Y.; Andrici, J.; Perry-Keene, J.L.; Paik, J.; Sioson, L.; Clarkson, A.; Sheen, A.; Luxford, C.; et al. Parafibromin-deficient (HPT-JT Type, CDC73 Mutated) Parathyroid Tumors Demonstrate Distinctive Morphologic Features. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 35–46.
  6. Kutahyalioglu, M.; Nguyen, H.T.; Kwatampora, L.; Clarke, C.; Silva, A.; Ibrahim, E.; Waguespack, S.G.; Cabanillas, M.E.; Jimenez, C.; Hu, M.I.; et al. Genetic profiling as a clinical tool in advanced parathyroid carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 1977–1986.
  7. Cardoso, L.; Stevenson, M.; Thakker, R.V. Molecular genetics of syndromic and non-syndromic forms of parathyroid carcinoma. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 1621–1648.
  8. Hewitt, K.M.; Sharma, P.K.; Samowitz, W.; Hobbs, M. Aberrant methylation of the HRPT2 gene in parathyroid carcinoma. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2007, 116, 928–933.
  9. Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, O.; Bi, Y.; Xing, X.; Cui, M.; Wang, M.; Tao, W.; Liao, Q.; Zhao, Y. The genomic profile of parathyroid carcinoma based on whole-genome sequencing. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 2446–2457.
  10. Newey, P.J.; Bowl, M.R.; Thakker, R.V. Parafibromin--functional insights. J. Intern. Med. 2009, 266, 84–98.
  11. Woodard, G.E.; Lin, L.; Zhang, J.H.; Agarwal, S.K.; Marx, S.J.; Simonds, W.F. Parafibromin, product of the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome gene HRPT2, regulates cyclin D1/PRAD1 expression. Oncogene 2005, 24, 1272–1276.
  12. Zhang, C.; Kong, D.; Tan, M.H.; Pappas, D.L., Jr.; Wang, P.F.; Chen, J.; Farber, L.; Zhang, N.; Koo, H.M.; Weinreich, M.; et al. Parafibromin inhibits cancer cell growth and causes G1 phase arrest. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 350, 17–24.
  13. Agarwal, S.K.; Simonds, W.F.; Marx, S.J. The parafibromin tumor suppressor protein interacts with actin-binding proteins actinin-2 and actinin-3. Mol. Cancer 2008, 7, 65.
  14. DeLellis, R.A. Parathyroid tumors and related disorders. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, S78–S93.
  15. Yu, W.; McPherson, J.R.; Stevenson, M.; van Eijk, R.; Heng, H.L.; Newey, P.; Gan, A.; Ruano, D.; Huang, D.; Poon, S.L.; et al. Whole-exome sequencing studies of parathyroid carcinomas reveal novel PRUNE2 mutations, distinctive mutational spectra related to APOBEC-catalyzed DNA mutagenesis and mutational enrichment in kinases associated with cell migration and invasion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E360–E364.
  16. Pandya, C.; Uzilov, A.V.; Bellizzi, J.; Lau, C.Y.; Moe, A.S.; Strahl, M.; Hamou, W.; Newman, L.C.; Fink, M.Y.; Antipin, Y.; et al. Genomic profiling reveals mutational landscape in parathyroid carcinomas. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e92061.
  17. Forsberg, L.; Björck, E.; Hashemi, J.; Zedenius, J.; Höög, A.; Farnebo, L.O.; Reimers, M.; Larsson, C. Distinction in gene expression profiles demonstrated in parathyroid adenomas by high-density oligoarray technology. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2005, 152, 459–470.
  18. Zhao, L.; Sun, L.H.; Liu, D.M.; He, X.Y.; Tao, B.; Ning, G.; Liu, J.M.; Zhao, H.Y. Copy number variation in CCND1 gene is implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic parathyroid carcinoma. World J. Surg. 2014, 38, 1730–1737.
  19. Chandrasekharappa, S.C.; Guru, S.C.; Manickam, P.; Olufemi, S.E.; Collins, F.S.; Emmert-Buck, M.R.; Debelenko, L.V.; Zhuang, Z.; Lubensky, I.A.; Liotta, L.A.; et al. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science 1997, 276, 404–407.
  20. Singh Ospina, N.; Sebo, T.J.; Thompson, G.B.; Clarke, B.L.; Young, W.F., Jr. Prevalence of parathyroid carcinoma in 348 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1—Case report and review of the literature. Clin. Endocrinol. 2016, 84, 244–249.
  21. Cinque, L.; Sparaneo, A.; Cetani, F.; Coco, M.; Clemente, C.; Chetta, M.; Balsamo, T.; Battista, C.; Sanpaolo, E.; Pardi, E.; et al. Novel association of MEN1 gene mutations with parathyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 23–30.
  22. Kang, H.; Pettinga, D.; Schubert, A.D.; Ladenson, P.W.; Ball, D.W.; Chung, J.H.; Schrock, A.B.; Madison, R.; Frampton, G.M.; Stephens, P.J.; et al. Genomic Profiling of Parathyroid Carcinoma Reveals Genomic Alterations Suggesting Benefit from Therapy. Oncologist 2019, 24, 791–797.
  23. Haven, C.J.; van Puijenbroek, M.; Tan, M.H.; Teh, B.T.; Fleuren, G.J.; van Wezel, T.; Morreau, H. Identification of MEN1 and HRPT2 somatic mutations in paraffin-embedded (sporadic) parathyroid carcinomas. Clin. Endocrinol. 2007, 67, 370–376.
  24. Aoki, M.; Fujishita, T. Oncogenic Roles of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Axis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 407, 153–189.
  25. Porta, C.; Paglino, C.; Mosca, A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 64.
  26. Lawrence, M.S.; Stojanov, P.; Mermel, C.H.; Robinson, J.T.; Garraway, L.A.; Golub, T.R.; Meyerson, M.; Gabriel, S.B.; Lander, E.S.; Getz, G. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 2014, 505, 495–501.
  27. Kasaian, K.; Wiseman, S.M.; Thiessen, N.; Mungall, K.L.; Corbett, R.D.; Qian, J.Q.; Nip, K.M.; He, A.; Tse, K.; Chuah, E.; et al. Complete genomic landscape of a recurring sporadic parathyroid carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2013, 230, 249–260.
  28. Clarke, C.N.; Katsonis, P.; Hsu, T.K.; Koire, A.M.; Silva-Figueroa, A.; Christakis, I.; Williams, M.D.; Kutahyalioglu, M.; Kwatampora, L.; Xi, Y.; et al. Comprehensive Genomic Characterization of Parathyroid Cancer Identifies Novel Candidate Driver Mutations and Core Pathways. J. Endocr. Soc. 2019, 3, 544–559.
  29. Zhan, T.; Rindtorff, N.; Boutros, M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1461–1473.
  30. Svedlund, J.; Aurén, M.; Sundström, M.; Dralle, H.; Akerström, G.; Björklund, P.; Westin, G. Aberrant WNT/β-catenin signaling in parathyroid carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 294.
  31. Wachsmannova, L.; Mego, M.; Stevurkova, V.; Zajac, V.; Ciernikova, S. Novel strategies for comprehensive mutation screening of the APC gene. Neoplasma 2017, 64, 338–343.
  32. Liu, F.; Lu, X.; Zhou, X.; Huang, H. APC gene promoter methylation as a potential biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis. Thorac. Cancer 2021, 12, 2907–2913.
  33. Katoh, M. Multi-layered prevention and treatment of chronic inflammation, organ fibrosis and cancer associated with canonical WNT/β-catenin signaling activation (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 713–725.
  34. Sugiura, T.; Yamaguchi, A.; Miyamoto, K. A cancer-associated RING finger protein, RNF43, is a ubiquitin ligase that interacts with a nuclear protein, HAP95. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 1519–1528.
  35. Giannakis, M.; Hodis, E.; Jasmine Mu, X.; Yamauchi, M.; Rosenbluh, J.; Cibulskis, K.; Saksena, G.; Lawrence, M.S.; Qian, Z.R.; Nishihara, R.; et al. RNF43 is frequently mutated in colorectal and endometrial cancers. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1264–1266.
  36. Bell, R.J.; Rube, H.T.; Xavier-Magalhães, A.; Costa, B.M.; Mancini, A.; Song, J.S.; Costello, J.F. Understanding TERT Promoter Mutations: A Common Path to Immortality. Mol. Cancer Res. 2016, 14, 315–323.
  37. Horn, S.; Figl, A.; Rachakonda, P.S.; Fischer, C.; Sucker, A.; Gast, A.; Kadel, S.; Moll, I.; Nagore, E.; Hemminki, K.; et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science 2013, 339, 959–961.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback