Electro-osmosis: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Beatrix Zheng and Version 2 by Beatrix Zheng.

Electroosmotic flow (or electro-osmotic flow, often abbreviated EOF; synonymous with electroosmosis or electroendosmosis) is the motion of liquid induced by an applied potential across a porous material, capillary tube, membrane, microchannel, or any other fluid conduit. Because electroosmotic velocities are independent of conduit size, as long as the electrical double layer is much smaller than the characteristic length scale of the channel, electroosmotic flow will have little effect. Electroosmotic flow is most significant when in small channels. Electroosmotic flow is an essential component in chemical separation techniques, notably capillary electrophoresis. Electroosmotic flow can occur in natural unfiltered water, as well as buffered solutions. File:Electroosmotic Flow Depiction.tiff

  • electrical double layer
  • electroosmotic flow
  • electroendosmosis

1. History

Electro-osmotic flow was first reported in 1807 by Ferdinand Friedrich Reuss (18 February 1778 (Tübingen, Germany) – 14 April 1852 (Stuttgart, Germany))[1] in an unpublished lecture before the Physical-Medical Society of Moscow;[2] Reuss first published an account of electro-osmotic flow in 1809 in the Memoirs of the Imperial Society of Naturalists of Moscow.[3][4] He showed that water could be made to flow through a plug of clay by applying an electric voltage. Clay is composed of closely packed particles of silica and other minerals, and water flows through the narrow spaces between these particles just as it would through a narrow glass tube. Any combination of an electrolyte (a fluid containing dissolved ions) and an insulating solid would generate electro-osmotic flow, though for water/silica the effect is particularly large. Even so, flow speeds are typically only a few millimeters per second.

Electro-osmosis was discovered independently in 1814 by the English chemist Robert Porrett Jr. (1783–1868).[5][6]

2. Cause

Electroosmotic flow is caused by the Coulomb force induced by an electric field on net mobile electric charge in a solution. Because the chemical equilibrium between a solid surface and an electrolyte solution typically leads to the interface acquiring a net fixed electrical charge, a layer of mobile ions, known as an electrical double layer or Debye layer, forms in the region near the interface. When an electric field is applied to the fluid (usually via electrodes placed at inlets and outlets), the net charge in the electrical double layer is induced to move by the resulting Coulomb force. The resulting flow is termed electroosmotic flow.

3. Description

The resulting flow from applying a voltage is a plug flow. Unlike a parabolic profile flow generated from a pressure differential, a plug flow’s velocity profile is approximately planar, with slight variation near the electric double layer. This offers significantly less deleterious dispersive effects and can be controlled without valves, offering a high-performance method for fluid separation, although many complex factors prove this control to be difficult. Because of difficulties measuring and monitoring flow in microfluidic channels, primarily disrupting the flow pattern, most analysis is done through numerical methods and simulation.[7]

Electroosmotic flow through microchannels can be modeled after the Navier-Stokes equation with the driving force deriving from the electric field and the pressure differential. Thus it is governed by the continuity equation

[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla \cdot\mathbf{U} = 0 }[/math]

and momentum

[math]\displaystyle{ \rho \frac{D \mathbf{U}}{D t} = -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{U} + \rho_e \nabla \left( \psi + \phi \right), }[/math]

where U is the velocity vector, ρ is the density of the fluid, [math]\displaystyle{ D/Dt }[/math] is the material derivative, μ is the viscosity of the fluid, ρe is the electric charge density, Φ is the applied electric field, ψ is the electric field due to the zeta potential at the walls and p is the fluid pressure.

Laplace’s equation can describe the external electric field

[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \phi = 0, }[/math]

while the potential within the electric double layer is governed by

[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \psi = \frac{-\rho_e}{\epsilon\epsilon_0}, }[/math]

where ε is the dielectric constant of the electrolyte solution and ε0 is the vacuum permittivity. This equation can be further simplified using the Debye-Hückel approximation

[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \psi = k^2\psi, }[/math]

where 1 / k is the Debye Length, used to describe the characteristic thickness of the electric double layer. The equations for potential field within the double layer can be combined as

[math]\displaystyle{ \rho_e = -\epsilon \epsilon_0 k^2 \psi. }[/math]

4. Applications

Electro-osmotic flow is commonly used in microfluidic devices,[8][9] soil analysis and processing,[10] and chemical analysis,[11] all of which routinely involve systems with highly charged surfaces, often of oxides. One example is capillary electrophoresis,[9][11] in which electric fields are used to separate chemicals according to their electrophoretic mobility by applying an electric field to a narrow capillary, usually made of silica. In electrophoretic separations, the electroosmotic flow affects the elution time of the analytes.

Electro-osmotic flow is actuated in a FlowFET to electronically control fluid flow through a junction.

It is projected that micro fluidic devices utilizing electroosmotic flow will have applications in medical research. Once controlling this flow is better understood and implemented, the ability to separate fluids on the atomic level will be a vital component for drug dischargers.[12] Mixing fluids at the micro scale is currently troublesome. It is believed that electrically controlling fluids will be the method in which small fluids are mixed.[12]

A controversial use of electro-osmotic systems is the control rising damp in the walls of buildings.[13] While there is little evidence to suggest that these systems can be useful in moving salts in walls, such systems are claimed to be especially effective in structures with very thick walls. However some claim that there is no scientific base for those systems, and cite several examples for their failure.[14]

4.1. Physics

In fuel cells, electro-osmosis causes protons moving through a proton exchange membrane (PEM) to drag water molecules from one side (anode) to the other (cathode).

4.2. Vascular Plant Biology

In vascular plant biology, electro-osmosis is also used as an alternative or supplemental explanation for the movement of polar liquids via the phloem that differs from the cohesion-tension theory supplied in the mass flow hypothesis and others, such as cytoplasmic streaming.[15] Companion cells are involved in the "cyclic" withdrawal of ions (K+) from sieve tubes, and their secretion parallel to their position of withdrawal between sieve plates, resulting in polarisation of sieve plate elements alongside potential difference in pressure, and results in polar water molecules and other solutes present moved upward through the phloem.[15]

In 2003, St Petersburg University graduates applied direct electric current to 10 mm segments of mesocotyls of maize seedlings alongside one-year linden shoots; electrolyte solutions present in the tissues moved toward the cathode that was in place, suggesting that electro-osmosis might play a role in solution transport through conductive plant tissues.[16]

5. Disadvantages

Maintaining an electric field in an electrolyte requires Faradaic reactions to occur at the anode and cathode. This is typically electrolysis of water, which generates hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen ions (acid) and hydroxide (base) as well as oxygen and hydrogen gas bubbles. The hydrogen peroxide and/or pH changes generated can adversely affect biological cells and biomolecules such as proteins, while gas bubbles tend to "clog" microfluidic systems. These problems can be alleviated by using alternative electrode materials such as conjugated polymers which can undergo the Faradaic reactions themselves, dramatically reducing electrolysis.[17]


  1. Biographical information about F.F. Reuss is available (in German) at: Deutsche Biographie https://www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd116453672.html#adbcontent
  2. A notice of Reuss' lecture appeared in: Reuss, F.F. (November 1807). "Indicium de novo hucusque nondum cognito effectu electricitatis galvanicae" (in Latin). Commentationes Societatis Physico-medicae, Apud Universitatem Literarum Caesaream Mosquensem Institutae (Memoirs of the Physical-Medical Society, Instituted at the Moscow Imperial University of Letters) 1, pt. 1: xxxix.  Available at: Österreichische Nationalbibliothek (Austrian National Library) http://digital.onb.ac.at/OnbViewer/viewer.faces?doc=ABO_%2BZ179661503
  3. Reuss, F. F. (1809). "Notice sur un nouvel effet de l'électricité galvanique" (in French). Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 2: 327–337. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/234594#page/375/mode/1up. 
  4. Biscombe, Christian J.C. (2017). "The discovery of electrokinetic phenomena: setting the record straight". Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 (29): 8338–8340. doi:10.1002/anie.201608536. PMID 27902877.  Available at: Wiley.com https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.201608536
  5. Porrett, R. Jr. (1816). "Curious galvanic experiments". Annals of Philosophy 8: 74–76. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hxh3l7;view=1up;seq=92. 
  6. (Biscombe, 2017), p. 8339.
  7. Yao, G.F. (2003). "A computational model for simulation of electroosmotic flow in microsystems". Technical Proceedings of the 2003 Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show [23–27 February 2003; San Francisco, California]. 1. Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Computational Publications. pp. 218–221. ISBN 978-0-9728422-0-4. https://www.nsti.org/publications/Nanotech/2003/pdf/M7215.pdf. 
  8. Bruus, H. (2007). Theoretical Microfluidics. ISBN 978-0-19-923509-4. 
  9. Kirby, B. J. (2010). Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices: Chapter 6: Electroosmosis. Cambridge University Press. http://www.kirbyresearch.com/index.cfm/wrap/textbook/microfluidicsnanofluidicsch6.html. 
  10. Wise, D. L. and Trantolo, D. J., eds.. Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils. 
  11. Skoog (2007). Principles of Instrumental Analysis. ISBN 978-0-495-12570-9. 
  12. Ducree, Jen. myFluidix.com. http://myfluidix.com/. 
  13. Ottosen, Lisbeth; Anne J. Pedersen; Inge Rorig-Dalgaard (September 2007). "Salt related problems in brick masonry and electrokinetic removal of salts". Journal of Building Appraisal 3 (3): 181–194. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jba.2950074.  Available at: Springer.com https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.jba.2950074
  14. "Electro Osmosis Damp Proofing systems – fraud, or the perfect solution to damp – you decide!". http://www.heritage-house.org/electro-osmosis-damp-proofing-systems-an-expensive-fraud.html. 
  15. Clegg, C. J., Mackean, D. G. (2006) "Advanced Biology – principles & applications" Hodder Stoughton Publishers, pp. 340–343.
  16. Polevoi, V. V. (2003). "Electroosmotic Phenomena in Plant Tissues". Biology Bulletin 30 (2): 133–139. doi:10.1023/A:1023285121361.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1023285121361
  17. Erlandsson, P. G.; Robinson, N. D. (2011). "Electrolysis-reducing electrodes for electrokinetic devices". Electrophoresis 32 (6–7): 784–790. doi:10.1002/elps.201000617. PMID 21425174. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-67312.