Plant Growth in Altered Gravity/Microgravity: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by F. Javier Medina and Version 2 by Sirius Huang.

Understanding how plants respond and adapt to extraterrestrial conditions is essential for space exploration initiatives. Deleterious effects of the space environment on plant development have been reported, such as the unbalance of cell growth and proliferation in the root meristem, or gene expression reprogramming. However, plants are capable of surviving and completing the seed-to-seed life cycle under microgravity. A key research challenge is to identify environmental cues, such as light, which could compensate the negative effects of microgravity.

  • microgravity
  • plant growth
  • root meristem
  • spaceflight

1. Introduction

  1. Introduction

The establishment of permanent settlements in the Moon and Mars is becoming a realistic possibility in the near future. After a decade of successful rover explorations to the surface of Mars [1], both ESA and NASA, and more recently, the agencies from growing economies in Asian countries, are working to promote a human mission, first to the Moon, and then to Mars.

The objectives of deep space exploration by humans, including of the Moon and Mars, require the implementation of a complex system of life support for space explorers, capable of supplying the elements necessary for sustaining their life (oxygen, food, moisture, etc.) and of removing their waste products. The system needs to be bioregenerative, i.e., the components need to self-regenerate without the addition of new elements brought from Earth, and energy-efficient, only using the power sources available in space.

Plants are a candidate to occupy a key position in these bioregenerative life support systems (BLSSs). They are indeed being used in all the initiatives tested currently, such as MELiSSA—Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative [2][3]. There is no doubt that plants must accompany humans in space exploration ventures, because they offer the potential to provide food, replenish the air, filter water, and improve the psychological wellbeing of the crew during long-duration missions in space.

The achievement of a true “space agriculture” is a fundamental objective of this global enterprise, and the advances in this task are already producing substantial benefits for the efficiency and sustainability of the terrestrial agriculture [4][5]. The existence of “Martian greenhouses” is an image that appears to be more common to the public eye. In these greenhouses, plants could be provided with the necessary environmental elements to enable their development. These elements include light, water, temperature, oxygen, CO2, and aeration, in addition, obviously, to a substrate in which to anchor, from which the plant will take nutrients through its roots. Apart from anchoring the root, the substrate (e.g., soil) has to be capable of sustaining root development. Some published experiments have demonstrated that terrestrial plants can grow in an analogue of lunar soil or Martian soil, provided that this substrate is supplemented with additional elements and substances that provide the plant with the water, mineral salts, and nutrients that it needs for its survival and development [6]. Recently, plants have been grown in real Lunar regoliths brought back by Apollo missions, showing that the Lunar regolith is capable of supporting plant growth; however, it is not certainly the best substrate, because some stress was generated in samples grown on it [7].

In addition to the issues originated by the alien soils and the supply of the environmental conditions required for the growth of terrestrial plants, two important adverse factors need to be counteracted. These are the gravity level, different from the Earth value (microgravity—near 0 g—in orbit, 0.17 g for the Moon surface, and 0.38 g for the Mars surface) and the existence of cosmic radiation. These two are the only environmental factors that are unavoidable and unable to be counteracted using technological solutions or elements available on Earth. Moreover, plants have not encountered these conditions throughout their evolutionary history. Thus, the cultivation of plants in spaceflight, as well as on the Moon and Mars, requires that the specimens to be cultivated become adapted to grow and develop in the presence of these two environmental factors. To achieve this objective, we first need a full understanding of the biological mechanisms of response and adaptation to conditions of the spaceflight environment. Obviously, the development of technological countermeasures or the use of biological strategies that would mitigate the unfavorable impact of gravity and radiation is a complementary strategy to consider.

2. Altered Gravity/Microgravity Disturbs Plant Growth

  1. Altered Gravity/Microgravity Disturbs Plant Growth

Plant seeds were, strictly speaking, the first organisms in space, launched on a U.S. V-2 rocket in 1946, representing some early suborbital biological experiments handled by Harvard University and the Naval Research Laboratory [8]. However, the first scientific experiment consisting of growing plants in space was carried out within the Oasis 1 hardware aboard the spacecraft Salyut 1 in 1971 [9], (reviewed by [10]). Then, experiments were performed on facilities installed in the NASA Space Shuttle, or on the Soviet MIR Station. As for space research in general, investigations on the response of plants to the space environment were significantly boosted after the assembly and operation of the International Space Station (ISS) [11]. In parallel, similar plant growth experiments on Earth, using ground-based facilities for microgravity simulation, such as clinostats and random positioning machines (RPMs), have successfully been performed [12][13]. Parabolic flights have been used as a source of real microgravity for experimentation, but it is preceded by a period of hypergravity [14], which may alter the way an organism responds to microgravity. Suborbital flights, especially sounding rockets, have successfully been used for exposing plants to microgravity for limited periods of time (i.e., in the order of minutes) [11][15].

The main conclusion obtained from pioneering space experiments in orbit was that plants could survive and grow in space, although alterations were soon reported [16][17]. The results were sometimes contradictory, in most cases due to deficiencies in the experimental setup and the devices used to germinate seeds and grow plants. Major improvements in culture facilities have allowed us to conclude that microgravity itself does not prevent plant growth and reproduction. In fact, the use of newly implemented research facilities on the ISS led to impressive progress in plant biology research in space over the last two decades [11][18]. However, the number of pending unresolved questions is enormous and the difficulties and constraints of spaceflight research still represent major obstacles.

The first European experiment on plant biology, carried out on the ISS in 2003, was the ROOT experiment, included in the experimental program of the “Cervantes” Mission (Spanish Soyuz Mission) with the objective of investigating alterations induced by the space environment on cellular features of the root meristem. Subsequently, a key step in this research on the ISS was the installation of the European Modular Cultivation System (EMCS), a facility specifically dedicated to the growth of seedlings and small plants equipped with advanced environmental controls for plant growth, as well as centrifuges for setting specific gravity conditions [19].

The first experiment carried out in the EMCS was the TROPI project, in 2006, aiming to study the interacting effects of gravity and other stimuli, such as light, on plant growth, to gain insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of tropisms and to better understand the interaction between gravitropism and phototropism [20]. Since then, the influence of gravity on early plant development and growth, as well as gravity perception thresholds for species such as lentils and Arabidopsis, and, more recently, the changes in the patterns of gene expression induced by the microgravity environment, have been studied on the ISS using the ESA’s EMCS and KUBIK incubators [21][22], NASA’s BRIC—Biological Research in Canisters [23], ABRS—Advanced Biological Research System [24] and APEX—Advanced Plant Experiment [25] , and the JAXA’s PEU—Plant Experimental Unit [26].

All these studies have demonstrated serious alterations in the physiology and development of seedlings and young plants grown in space. The results of the ROOT experiment revealed that one of the most relevant effects of altered gravity is the disruption of the meristematic competence in cells of the root apical meristem [27][28]. This observation means that, under microgravity conditions, cell proliferation and cell growth appear uncoupled, losing their coordinated progress, which is characteristic of these cells under normal ground gravity conditions [29] . The cell proliferation rate is increased and cell growth, estimated by the rate of production of ribosomes, the cellular factories of protein biosynthesis, is depleted. Further complementary experiments performed on ground-based facilities for microgravity simulation, including sequential sampling at different growth times and the analysis of expression of some key genes of cell cycle regulation, have confirmed the uncoupling of cell proliferation and ribosome biogenesis caused by altered gravity, showing that microgravity induces serious alterations in the root meristem [30][31] . This tissue plays a central role in establishing developmental patterns of the plant; therefore, the alterations induced by microgravity represent a serious compromise for plant development and, maybe, even for plant viability.

The observations and interpretations made on root meristems from seedlings have been confirmed and demonstrated in studies performed on cells cultured in vitro and grown in simulated microgravity. Flow cytometry analysis provided evidence for an accelerated cell cycle in cells grown in the random positioning machine (RPM). The final acceleration was the result of a shorter G2 phase and a slightly longer G1 phase. Analysis of gene expression showed a general downregulation of genes involved in the G2/M transition checkpoint and the upregulation of many genes controlling the G1/S transition. This is accompanied by the downregulation of significant genes regulating ribosome biogenesis and by the depletion of levels of nucleolin and fibrillarin, two nucleolar proteins considered markers of this process. In addition, a general depletion of the nuclear transcription was detected, accompanied by an increase in chromatin condensation, which was associated with changes in enzymes involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression [32][33][34] . According to data from many studies, the factor triggering the cascade of functional events that eventually resulted in the alteration of meristematic cell proliferation and growth and in the disruption of meristematic competence is the phytohormone auxin [35] . This hormone is a chief controller of the balance between cell proliferation and cell differentiation existing in meristems, which is the basis of the fundamental involvement of the meristematic tissue in plant development [36] . Moreover, auxin influences multiple aspects of plant growth and development, including the regulation of cell cycle progression and the coordination between cell growth and cell division [37] . From a more general perspective, auxin regulates the connection between stimuli perceived by the plant and the cellular responses to them [38] .

The TROPI-1 experiment, the first experiment carried out in the EMCS, produced high-quality video downlinks of growing seedlings. It was shown that emissions with blue light might give an increased phototropic response in the hypocotyls. In addition, a novel positive phototropic response was observed after exposure to red light in hypocotyls and roots developed in microgravity [39] . In a complementary experiment with shared objectives, called TROPI-2, the positive phototropic curvature in hypocotyls and roots mediated by phytochrome, observed as a response to red light, was confirmed. At gravitational accelerations ranging from 0.1 g to 0.3 g, an attenuation of red-light-based phototropism of both roots and hypocotyls was observed [40] . Furthermore, from the frozen TROPI-2 samples returned, high-quality RNA was isolated and transcriptomic analysis was performed. Differences in expression between spaceflight samples and ground controls mostly affected genes involved in regulating cell polarity, cell wall development, oxygen status, and cell defense or stress. These differences represent the adaptive mechanisms of plants to the spaceflight environment [41] .

The transcriptomic study carried out in the TROPI-2 project was part of a considerable effort made by different research groups directed to determine the effects of spaceflight on the plant genome, especially how microgravity conditions change gene and protein expression, using advanced -omics methodologies. Various experimental approaches have been assayed. Transcriptomic studies have used seedlings, plant organs, whole plants, and cultured cells of different types (established lines and callus cultures) exposed to real microgravity (spaceflight) or to simulated microgravity in ground-based facilities (see for example [42][43][44][25][45][46] . Collectively, these and other studies have demonstrated the complex responses in plants, involving reprogramming of the gene expression patterns. To date, specific genes of responses to gravity alterations have not been found; instead, genes known to participate in general mechanisms of the response to abiotic stresses have been shown to modify their expression in the microgravity environment. Genes coding for heat-shock-related elements, cell wall remodeling factors, oxidative burst intermediates, and components of the general mechanisms of plant defense are the main and most frequent targets of gene reprogramming induced by microgravity.

3. Plants May Overcome Gravitational Stress and Adapt to the Space Environment

  1. Plants May Overcome Gravitational Stress and Adapt to the Space Environment

All the aforementioned research has focused on studies of the alterations of biological mechanisms in plants induced by the space environment. Using molecular, cellular, and physiological methods, this has led to the conclusion that the space environment is deleterious for normal plant life, such as it is known on Earth. However, together with this fundamental research, mainly using model plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana, an alternative approach has consisted of the direct in situ production of vegetable crops on the ISS, and their eventual use as fresh food to supplement the packaged diet of astronauts. This has been (and still it is) a specific objective of NASA. Obviously, food crops grown in space experience different environmental conditions (e.g., reduced gravity and elevated radiation levels) compared with plants grown on Earth, which have been revealed as potentially harmful to plant life. However, the first result of this novel approach was that red romaine lettuce was successfully grown in three tests in the Vegetable Production System (Veggie) facility with two different harvest methods, and yields were comparable to growth on Earth. The production and tasting of the first “space salad” and, shortly after, the development of a Zinnia flower, received much attention from mass media all over the world, and the first nutritional analysis of space-grown plants has recently been published [47] , showing that lettuces grown on the ISS are nutritionally and microbiologically safe for humans. In addition to Veggie, NASA has recently implemented the Advanced Plant Habitat (APH) on the ISS, a more sophisticated facility with similar purposes, and complemented the Veggie facility with the Exposed Roots On-Orbit Test System (X-ROOTS). The general purpose of this effort is to perform compatible plant-related scientific research on ISS, using molecular, cellular, and physiological methods, with the direct production of fresh and nutritious food in bioregenerative life support systems (BLSSs). The final objective is that reduced plant growth in space can be directly translated into larger planting areas.

In addition to applications for the production of food for space explorers, these experiments enable the drawing of relevant conclusions related to the physiology of plants in microgravity. Lettuce and other crops cultured in Veggie and APH are indeed adult plants; therefore, despite the stresses on plant growth and development caused by the space environment, and specifically, by microgravity, plants are capable of overcoming adverse circumstances, removing the obstacles, and achieving successful development until the adult stage, including reproduction.

These results complement experiments specifically addressed to complete the full life cycle of plants (seed-to-seed) in space, carried out with A. thaliana. Using advanced growth chambers which, in general, provide a well-regulated environment for growing plants in microgravity on the ISS, fertile adult plants have been produced from seeds germinated in space; seeds obtained from these plants have, in turn, been germinated. The ADVANCED ASTROCULTURE (ADVASC) experiment, consisting of two successive experiments, was carried out in 2001–2002, in which the plant life cycle was completed [48] . A second experiment was the Japanese SPACE SEED, carried out in the Kibo module of the ISS in 2009 [26] . It is therefore clear that plants are capable of acclimating/adapting to the space environment. However, we currently lack knowledge of the mechanisms (cellular or molecular) by which the adaptation takes place and eventually succeeds. Currently, a key challenge for plant space research is to determine how and when the plant triggers mechanisms of adaptation in order to attenuate, or even overcome, the survival problems associated with a weightless environment.

The adaptation of plants to the space environment may benefit from other environmental cues replacing gravity. The optimization of plant growth in the microgravity environment of spaceflight, as well as in any other condition of reduced gravity, could become feasible by implementing the substitution of gravity by another external cue, which could play the same or a similar role in driving plant growth and development as gravity does on Earth. Light is a good candidate to be one of these cues because it is a tropistic stimulus. Phototropism complements gravitropism under normal ground conditions, with the objective of optimizing the efficiency of the capture of nutrients. In addition, illumination, especially by red light, is sensed and mediated by phytochromes to produce changes in the regulation of auxin-responsive genes and many growth coordinators [49] . A specific effect of red light in the activation of specific cellular processes known to be depleted in the microgravity environment, such as cell proliferation and ribosome biogenesis, had previously been reported [50] . Furthermore, light is known to induce the reorganization of chromatin architecture, as well as a global amplification of nuclear transcription [51] . These effects could potentially reverse the epigenetic de-activation that was found to be an effect of the simulated microgravity in cultured cells, as mentioned above.

The series of three experiments termed the Seedling Growth (SG) Project was conducted in the ISS (2013-2017) with the aim of unraveling the link between light and gravity, and of determining the combined influence of light and gravity on plant development, at reduced gravity levels. Among other objectives, the project investigated to what extent light could act as a signal capable of counteracting the deleterious effects caused by the lack of gravity. Specifically, the project aimed at exploring if, and to what extent, specific light conditions could be applied to modulate the alterations caused by the lack of gravity on plant growth and development, thus facilitating the adaptation of plants to the space environment.

The experimental results in ISS, on the one hand, allowed the identification of new phototropic responses to blue light in space, which complement former findings obtained in the previous TROPI I and II experiments [52] . Furthermore, they revealed a positive effect of photoactivation with red light in counteracting the stress caused by spaceflight. After photoactivation, qPCR analysis showed a concerted upregulation of marker genes for cell proliferation, cell growth and auxin polar transport [53] . Different cellular and molecular parameters were compared at different levels of gravity (microgravity, Mars gravity and ground control gravity) with and without red light photoactivation. Auxin distribution appeared altered under microgravity with respect to the 1g control, indicative of altered auxin polar transport, but the control pattern was restored in red-light-photoactivated samples. In contrast, in roots grown at 0.3g, auxin polar transport was little altered, irrespective of photoactivation. Under this level of gravity roots and hypocotyls appeared oriented according to the gravity vector indicating that gravitropism was operating [54] . Red light increased meristem and nucleolar size and meristematic cells showed more active nucleoli [55] . These observations suggest that red light indeed counteracts the decoupling between cell proliferation and growth in root meristems reported in earlier experiments. Gene expression alterations, evaluated by RNAseq, showed different responses to different gravity levels and modulation of gene expression by red light photoactivation. Microgravity produced downregulation of photosynthesis function and increase in plastid and mitochondrial genome expression in comparison to 1g control. Mars gravity level induced an adaptive response, consisting of the activation of environmental acclimation-related transcription factors (WRKY and NACs families) [56][57], especially in photostimulated samples [55] . These activated factors are known targets for genetic crop improvement and this strategy could be used to produce crops better adapted to the space environment. Furthermore, a mutant line defective in a nucleolar protein involved in the stress response (nuc2) showed an attenuated response compared with the wild type, changing the expression of a smaller number of genes. This may constitute an advantage to be taken into account when selecting plant varieties for Life Support Systems, and opens the way to directed-mutagenesis strategies in crop design to be used in space colonization.

An important global result obtained from the SG experiments was the differential response found to each gravity level, triggering different adaptive responses involving changes in the regulation of different sets of genes. Mars gravity induced a milder alteration than microgravity, but the stress induced by low levels of gravity, comprised between microgravity and the Moon gravity, was even stronger than the microgravity stress. In all cases, the adaptive response appeared enhanced by red light photostimulation. These results of the SG experiments have been among the first obtained from a comparative analysis, using microgravity, different levels of partial gravity (including Moon and Mars gravity) and an on-board 1g control in flight. This is an essential requirement for successive experiments in spaceflight.

Furthermore, for the immediate future, we need to incorporate in theour studies the other space environmental factor that, along with gravity, is key to the survival of living beings and particularly of plants, namely radiation. Fortunately, there are experiments in development of different laboratories, and different devices and facilities providing the simultaneous application of radiation and different levels of simulated microgravity and partial gravity have been (or are being) developed and used in experiments.

In addition, we need to extend the cellular and molecular studies on plant adaptation to space environment, such as SG, to the use of crop species. NASA is actively promoting plant studies in ISS using the spaceflight incubators Veggie, APH, and X-ROOTS, but this activity is basically oriented to nutritional aspects, without giving the necessary priority to fundamental studies at cellular and molecular level. Surprisingly, the activity of ESA in Plant Biology studies has been relatively slow after the completion of the SG project. It would be very important that Europe recovers as soon as possible the initiative in this research area, thus playing again a relevant role when the need of an effective culture of plants in space, as a key support of the human life in space exploration, is becoming more and more urgent.

 

References

  1. Paul Voosen; NASA Curiosity rover hits organic pay dirt on Mars. Science 2018, 360, 1054-1055, 10.1126/science.360.6393.1054.
  2. Lasseur C, Brunet J, de Weever H, Dixon M, Dussap G, Godia F, Leys N, Mergeay M, Van Der Straeten D; MELiSSA: The European project of closed life support system. Gravitational and Space Biology 2010, 23, 3-12.
  3. Häder D-P, Braun M, Hemmersbach R. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems in space research. In Gravitational biology I: Gravity sensing and graviorientation in microorganisms and plants. ; G Ruyters, M Braun, Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham., 2018; pp. 113-122.
  4. Raymond M. Wheeler; Agriculture for Space: People and Places Paving the Way. Open Agriculture 2017, 2, 14-32, 10.1515/opag-2017-0002.
  5. F. Javier Medina; Space explorers need to be space farmers: What we know and what we need to know about plant growth in space. Mètode Science Studies Journal - Annual Review 2020, 11, 55-62, 10.7203/metode.11.14606.
  6. G. W. Wieger Wamelink; Joep Y. Frissel; Wilfred H. J. Krijnen; M. Rinie Verwoert; Paul W. Goedhart; Can Plants Grow on Mars and the Moon: A Growth Experiment on Mars and Moon Soil Simulants. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, e103138, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103138.
  7. Anna-Lisa Paul; Stephen M. Elardo; Robert Ferl; Plants grown in Apollo lunar regolith present stress-associated transcriptomes that inform prospects for lunar exploration. Communications Biology 2022, 5, 1-9, 10.1038/s42003-022-03334-8.
  8. Beischer DE, Fregly AR. Animals and man in space: A chronology and annotated bibliography, through the year 1960. US Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Vol 5; US Naval Aviation Medical Center: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1962; pp. --.
  9. Harvey B, Zakutnyaya O. Russian space probes: Scientific discoveries and future missions; Springer science & business media/Praxis Publishing: Chichester UK. , 2011; pp. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8159-9.
  10. P. Zabel; M. Bamsey; D. Schubert; M. Tajmar; Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems. Life Sciences in Space Research 2016, 10, 1-16, 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.004.
  11. Joshua P. Vandenbrink; John Z. Kiss; Space, the final frontier: A critical review of recent experiments performed in microgravity. Plant Science 2016, 243, 115-119, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.11.004.
  12. Raul Herranz; Ralf Anken; Johannes Boonstra; Markus Braun; Peter C.M. Christianen; Maarten de Geest; Jens Hauslage; Reinhard Hilbig; Richard J.A. Hill; Michael Lebert; et al.F. Javier MedinaNicole VagtOliver UllrichJack J.W.A. van LoonRuth Hemmersbach Ground-Based Facilities for Simulation of Microgravity: Organism-Specific Recommendations for Their Use, and Recommended Terminology. Astrobiology 2013, 13, 1-17, 10.1089/ast.2012.0876.
  13. John Z. Kiss; Chris Wolverton; Sarah E. Wyatt; Karl H. Hasenstein; Jack J.W.A. van Loon; Comparison of Microgravity Analogs to Spaceflight in Studies of Plant Growth and Development. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019, 10, 1577, 10.3389/fpls.2019.01577.
  14. Vladimir Pletser; European aircraft parabolic flights for microgravity research, applications and exploration: A review. REACH 2016, 1, 11-19, 10.1016/j.reach.2016.05.002.
  15. Jens Hauslage; Mark Görög; Lars Krause; Oliver Schüler; Martin Schäfer; Anika Witten; Leona Kesseler; Maik Böhmer; Ruth Hemmersbach; ARABIDOMICS-A new experimental platform for molecular analyses of plants in drop towers, on parabolic flights, and sounding rockets.. Review of Scientific Instruments 2020, 91, 034504, 10.1063/1.5120573.
  16. A.J. Merkys; R.S. Laurinavičius; D.V. Švegždiene; Plant growth, development and embryogenesis during Salyut-7 flight. Advances in Space Research 1984, 4, 55-63, 10.1016/0273-1177(84)90224-2.
  17. T W Halstead, and, and F R Dutcher 1987 38:1, 317-345; Plants in Space . Annual Review of Plant Physiology 1987, 38, 317-345, 10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001533.
  18. Aránzazu Manzano; Eugénie Carnero-Diaz; Raúl Herranz; F. Javier Medina; Recent transcriptomic studies to elucidate the plant adaptive response to spaceflight and to simulated space environments. iScience 2022, 25, 104687, 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104687.
  19. E. Brinckmann; ESA hardware for plant research on the International Space Station. Advances in Space Research 2005, 36, 1162-1166, 10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.019.
  20. John Z. Kiss; Prem Kumar; Katherine D.L. Millar; Richard E. Edelmann; Melanie J. Correll; Operations of a spaceflight experiment to investigate plant tropisms. Advances in Space Research 2009, 44, 879-886, 10.1016/j.asr.2009.06.007.
  21. A. -I. Kittang; T. -H. Iversen; K. R. Fossum; Christian Mazars; E. Carnero-Diaz; E. Boucheron-Dubuisson; I. Le Disquet; Valerie Legué; Raul Herranz; V. Pereda-Loth; et al.F. Javier Medina Exploration of plant growth and development using the European Modular Cultivation System facility on the International Space Station. Plant Biology 2014, 16, 528-538, 10.1111/plb.12132.
  22. François Bizet; Veronica Pereda-Loth; Hugo Chauvet; Joëlle Gérard; Brigitte Eche; Christine Girousse; Monique Courtade; Gérald Perbal; Valérie Legué; Both gravistimulation onset and removal trigger an increase of cytoplasmic free calcium in statocytes of roots grown in microgravity. Scientific Reports 2018, 8, 1-10, 10.1038/s41598-018-29788-7.
  23. Anna-Lisa Paul; Agata K. Zupanska; Dejerianne T. Ostrow; Yanping Zhang; Yijun Sun; Jian-Liang Li; Savita Shanker; William G. Farmerie; Claire E. Amalfitano; Robert J. Ferl; et al. Spaceflight Transcriptomes: Unique Responses to a Novel Environment. Astrobiology 2012, 12, 40-56, 10.1089/ast.2011.0696.
  24. Anna-Lisa Paul; Agata K Zupanska; Eric R Schultz; Robert J Ferl; Organ-specific remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in response to spaceflight. BMC Plant Biology 2013, 13, 112-112, 10.1186/1471-2229-13-112.
  25. Brandon Califar; Natasha J. Sng; Agata Zupanska; Anna-Lisa Paul; Robert J. Ferl; Root Skewing-Associated Genes Impact the Spaceflight Response of Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 11, 239, 10.3389/fpls.2020.00239.
  26. Sachiko Yano; Haruo Kasahara; Daisuke Masuda; Fumiaki Tanigaki; Toru Shimazu; Hiromi Suzuki; Ichirou Karahara; Kouichi Soga; Takayuki Hoson; Ichiro Tayama; et al.Yoshikazu TsuchiyaSeiichiro Kamisaka Improvements in and actual performance of the Plant Experiment Unit onboard Kibo, the Japanese experiment module on the international space station. Advances in Space Research 2013, 51, 780-788, 10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.002.
  27. Isabel Matı́a; Fernando González-Camacho; Roberto Marco; John Z. Kiss; Gilbert Gasset; Francisco-Javier Medina; Nucleolar structure and proliferation activity of Arabidopsis root cells from seedlings germinated on the International Space Station. Advances in Space Research 2005, 36, 1244-1253, 10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.068.
  28. Isabel Matía; Fernando González-Camacho; Raúl Herranz; John Z. Kiss; Gilbert Gasset; Jack J.W.A. van Loon; Roberto Marco; Francisco Javier Medina; Plant cell proliferation and growth are altered by microgravity conditions in spaceflight. Journal of Plant Physiology 2010, 167, 184-193, 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.012.
  29. Yukiko Mizukami; A matter of size: developmental control of organ size in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2001, 4, 533-539, 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00212-0.
  30. Ana Isabel Manzano; Oliver J Larkin; Camelia E Dijkstra; Paul Anthony; Michael R Davey; Laurence Eaves; Richard Ja Hill; Raul Herranz; F Javier Medina; Meristematic cell proliferation and ribosome biogenesis are decoupled in diamagnetically levitated Arabidopsis seedlings. BMC Plant Biology 2013, 13, 124-124, 10.1186/1471-2229-13-124.
  31. Elodie Boucheron-Dubuisson; Ana I. Manzano; Isabel Le Disquet; Isabel Matía; Julio Sáez-Vasquez; Jack J.W.A. van Loon; Raúl Herranz; Eugénie Carnero-Diaz; F. Javier Medina; Functional alterations of root meristematic cells of Arabidopsis thaliana induced by a simulated microgravity environment. Journal of Plant Physiology 2016, 207, 30-41, 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.09.011.
  32. Khaled Y. Kamal; Raúl Herranz; Jack J. W. A. van Loon; F. Javier Medina; Simulated microgravity, Mars gravity, and 2g hypergravity affect cell cycle regulation, ribosome biogenesis, and epigenetics in Arabidopsis cell cultures. Scientific Reports 2018, 8, 1-16, 10.1038/s41598-018-24942-7.
  33. Khaled Y. Kamal; Raúl Herranz; Jack J.W.A. van Loon; F. Javier Medina; Cell cycle acceleration and changes in essential nuclear functions induced by simulated microgravity in a synchronizedArabidopsiscell culture. Plant, Cell & Environment 2018, 42, 480-494, 10.1111/pce.13422.
  34. Khaled Y. Kamal; Jack J.W.A. van Loon; F. Javier Medina; Raúl Herranz; Differential transcriptional profile through cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis cultures under simulated microgravity. Genomics 2019, 111, 1956-1965, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.01.007.
  35. Francisco-Javier Medina; Raúl Herranz; Microgravity environment uncouples cell growth and cell proliferation in root meristematic cells: the mediator role of auxin.. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2010, 5, 176-9, 10.4161/psb.5.2.10966.
  36. Catherine Perrot-Rechenmann; Cellular Responses to Auxin: Division versus Expansion. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2010, 2, a001446-a001446, 10.1101/cshperspect.a001446.
  37. Karine M. David; Daniel Couch; Nils Braun; Spencer Brown; Jeanne Grosclaude; Catherine Perrot-Rechenmann; The auxin-binding protein 1 is essential for the control of cell cycle. The Plant Journal 2007, 50, 197-206, 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03038.x.
  38. Gloria K. Muday; Angus S. Murphy; An Emerging Model of Auxin Transport Regulation. The Plant Cell 2002, 14, 293-299, 10.1105/tpc.140230.
  39. Katherine D. L. Millar; Prem Kumar; Melanie J. Correll; Jack L. Mullen; Roger P. Hangarter; Richard E. Edelmann; John Z. Kiss; A novel phototropic response to red light is revealed in microgravity. New Phytologist 2010, 186, 648-656, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03211.x.
  40. John Z. Kiss; Katherine D. L. Millar; Richard E. Edelmann; Phototropism of Arabidopsis thaliana in microgravity and fractional gravity on the International Space Station. Planta 2012, 236, 635-645, 10.1007/s00425-012-1633-y.
  41. Melanie J. Correll; Tyler P. Pyle; Katherine D. L. Millar; Yijun Sun; Jin Yao; Richard E. Edelmann; John Z. Kiss; Transcriptome analyses of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings grown in space: implications for gravity-responsive genes. Planta 2013, 238, 519-533, 10.1007/s00425-013-1909-x.
  42. Oliver Schüler; Ruth Hemmersbach; Maik Böhmer; A Bird’s-Eye View of Molecular Changes in Plant Gravitropism Using Omics Techniques. Frontiers in Plant Science 2015, 6, 1176, 10.3389/fpls.2015.01176.
  43. Christina M. Johnson; Aswati Subramanian; Sivakumar Pattathil; Melanie J. Correll; John Z. Kiss; Comparative transcriptomics indicate changes in cell wall organization and stress response in seedlings during spaceflight. American Journal of Botany 2017, 104, 1219-1231, 10.3732/ajb.1700079.
  44. Agata K. Zupanska; Collin LeFrois; Robert J. Ferl; Anna-Lisa Paul; HSFA2 Functions in the Physiological Adaptation of Undifferentiated Plant Cells to Spaceflight. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019, 20, 390, 10.3390/ijms20020390.
  45. Colin Kruse; Alexander D. Meyers; Proma Basu; Sarahann Hutchinson; Darron R. Luesse; Sarah E. Wyatt; Spaceflight induces novel regulatory responses in Arabidopsis seedling as revealed by combined proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. BMC Plant Biology 2020, 20, 1-16, 10.1186/s12870-020-02392-6.
  46. Evan Angelos; Dae Kwan Ko; Starla Zemelis-Durfee; Federica Brandizzi; Relevance of the Unfolded Protein Response to Spaceflight-Induced Transcriptional Reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Astrobiology 2021, 21, 367-380, 10.1089/ast.2020.2313.
  47. Christina L. M. Khodadad; Mary E. Hummerick; Lashelle E. Spencer; Anirudha R. Dixit; Jeffrey T. Richards; Matthew W. Romeyn; Trent M. Smith; Raymond M. Wheeler; Gioia D. Massa; Microbiological and Nutritional Analysis of Lettuce Crops Grown on the International Space Station. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 11, 199, 10.3389/fpls.2020.00199.
  48. Bruce M. Link; James S. Busse; Bratislav Stankovic; Seed-to-Seed-to-Seed Growth and Development of Arabidopsis in Microgravity. Astrobiology 2014, 14, 866-875, 10.1089/ast.2014.1184.
  49. Joshua P. Vandenbrink; John Z. Kiss; Raul Herranz; F. Javier Medina; Light and gravity signals synergize in modulating plant development. Frontiers in Plant Science 2014, 5, 563-563, 10.3389/fpls.2014.00563.
  50. Stuart A. Reichler; Janneke Balk; Margaret E. Brown; Kathryn Woodruff; Greg B. Clark; Stanley J. Roux; Light Differentially Regulates Cell Division and the mRNA Abundance of Pea Nucleolin during De-Etiolation. Plant Physiology 2001, 125, 339-350, 10.1104/pp.125.1.339.
  51. Clara Bourbousse; Fredy Barneche; Christophe Laloi; Plant Chromatin Catches the Sun. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 10, 1728, 10.3389/fpls.2019.01728.
  52. Joshua P. Vandenbrink; Raul Herranz; F. Javier Medina; Richard E. Edelmann; John Z. Kiss; A novel blue-light phototropic response is revealed in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana in microgravity. Planta 2016, 244, 1201-1215, 10.1007/s00425-016-2581-8.
  53. Miguel A. Valbuena; Aránzazu Manzano; Joshua P. Vandenbrink; Veronica Pereda-Loth; Eugénie Carnero-Diaz; Richard E. Edelmann; John Z. Kiss; Raúl Herranz; F. Javier Medina; The combined effects of real or simulated microgravity and red-light photoactivation on plant root meristematic cells. Planta 2018, 248, 691-704, 10.1007/s00425-018-2930-x.
  54. F. Javier Medina; Aránzazu Manzano; Alicia Villacampa; Malgorzata Ciska; Raúl Herranz; Understanding Reduced Gravity Effects on Early Plant Development Before Attempting Life-Support Farming in the Moon and Mars. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 2021, 8, 729154, 10.3389/fspas.2021.729154.
  55. Alicia Villacampa; Malgorzata Ciska; Aránzazu Manzano; Joshua Vandenbrink; John Kiss; Raúl Herranz; F. Medina; From Spaceflight to Mars g-Levels: Adaptive Response of A. Thaliana Seedlings in a Reduced Gravity Environment Is Enhanced by Red-Light Photostimulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, 22, 899, 10.3390/ijms22020899.
  56. Olivier Van Aken; Botao Zhang; Simon Law; Reena Narsai; James Whelan; AtWRKY40 and AtWRKY63 Modulate the Expression of Stress-Responsive Nuclear Genes Encoding Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Proteins. Plant Physiology 2013, 162, 254-271, 10.1104/pp.113.215996.
  57. Ujjal J. Phukan; Gajendra S. Jeena; Rakesh K. Shukla; WRKY Transcription Factors: Molecular Regulation and Stress Responses in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016, 7, 760, 10.3389/fpls.2016.00760.
  58. Ujjal J. Phukan; Gajendra S. Jeena; Rakesh K. Shukla; WRKY Transcription Factors: Molecular Regulation and Stress Responses in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016, 7, 760, 10.3389/fpls.2016.00760.
More
Video Production Service