1. Introduction

1. Introduction

Nowadays, due the increasing competition and decreasing profit margins in the floricultural sector

^[1][2][3]

, some ornamental and horticultural nurseries are starting to consider flowers as food products

^[4][5]

, both to react to the crisis in the sector by diversifying their product, but also to satisfy the increasing demand for more attractive and high quality foodstuff

^[6][7][8]

. Moreover, since many of the edible flowers contain bioactive compounds, they can potentially be developed as new crops with health benefits

^{[9][10][11][12][13][14]}

. Nurseries should consider some other factors too in the production of edible flowers: efficient input use, cost savings, enhanced product quality, and the sustainable nature of production or manufacturing

^[3]

, due to the heightened awareness towards eco-sustainability

^[15]

. Currently, the evaluation of sustainability is important in the study of agricultural systems, which provide the raw material used in other activities

^[16]

. For greenhouse growers, sustainable production means applying the best management practices to enhance plant quality and reduce negative environmental impacts while sustaining or increasing profits

^[3]

. Thus, in a society increasingly directed towards organic and sustainable products, with increasing focus on the environmental burden, it becomes important to assess the sustainability of a basic production system, quantifying its impact and deciding the reducing measures to adopt, also giving additional value to the analyzed products in terms of eco - sustainability

^[16][17][18]

.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standardized methodology for investigating the environmental impact of a product, a production process, or a system

^[19][20]

, by identifying and quantifying objectively and transparently inputs and outputs of energy and material usage, and their associated environmental impacts, in order to reduce them

^[17][21]

. LCA has been used to assess the production system components of various types of nursery crop groups, such as trees and shrubs

^[3][22]

, vegetables

^[23][24][25]

, wine

^[26]

, fruits, and berries

^[27][28][29]

, to determine their respective contributions to emissions and variable costs of inputs and processes in the green industry

^[22]

.

At present, few LCA studies have been carried out in the floricultural sector if compared to those of other agricultural products

^[20][30]

, analyzing the greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions of the production cycles of cut flowers and ornamental plants (e.g., roses, lilies, cyclamens)

^[17][20]

, comparing two or more different plant production systems or nurseries, assessing different scenarios for the reduction of the environmental burdens produced by cultivation

^[19][31][32]

, or to review the application of LCA in floriculture

^[30]

. A specific study applying the LCA approach to edible flowers has been recently performed for the first time, evaluating the production of

Begonia x semperflorens - cultorum hort

(commonly referred to as

Begonia semperflorens

) and

Viola cornuta

L.

^[33]

, begonias and pansies, which are often produced and consumed as edible flowers

^[6]

.

B. semperflorens

was assumed to be representative of the species reproduced by cuttings, while

V. cornuta

was representative of species reproduced by seed. The analysis focused on two types of edible flower products to reveal possible differences in environmental impact over the whole production cycle: flowering potted plants (PP) and packaged flowers (in small and large containers – SC and LC) ready to be consumed.

The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is useful to understand which are the most impactful phases on the environment by simplifying the process

^[21][34]

, and allowing the evaluation of opportunities for environmental improvements over the whole life cycle

^[21]

.

Four main steps were followed for this LCA study

^[33]

.

2. Goal and scope definition

2. Goal and scope definition

The purpose of this study was to measure different types of emissions of the production process of a flowering potted plant compared to the production of packaged flowers ready to be consumed. Two edible flowers were chosen among the most produced species:

B. semperflorens

(reproduced by cutting) and

V. cornuta

(reproduced by seed), two annual bedding plants which differ in their propagation method. In order to model the production system, it was necessary to set some boundaries, virtual limits to select the internal components of the system to analyze

^[16]

. In this study, we used the “cradle to gate” approach: it considered the product’s life, from the supply and manufacture of the raw materials, following them through all the steps of production, until the completion of the final product

^[31]

.

Moreover, the definition of a suitable functional unit, to which all the outcomes are referred, was important to allow comparisons of alternative goods and services through the LCA method. We used a unit of weight, i.e., 1 g of fresh edible flowers, in order to compare the burden caused by the production of the two different final products.

3. Life Cycle Inventory (LCI).

3. Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)

The life cycle of begonias and pansies edible flowers’ production was modelled through interviews with the nursery’s growers, considering all the inputs and outputs

^[21][35]

. This step resulted in a flow diagram

^[15]

 (Figures 1-2), representing the production process. The primary data thus obtained were collected in a database and then processed by a specific LCA software, SimaPro 8.5.0.0. (PRē Sustainability – The Netherlands), in order to transform them into the environmental burdens and to quantify the different impact categories.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the production cycle of packaged flowers and flowering potted plants of B. semperflorens and V. cornuta edible flowers in the nursery ^[33].

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of the boundary (blue square) and inputs (green labels) considered for the production cycle of packaged flowers and flowering potted plants of

B. semperflorens

and

V. cornuta

edible flowers in the nursery. Grey labels outside the boundary were not considered in the analysis (cradle to gate approach)

^[33]

.

4. Life Cycle Inventory Analysis (LCIA)

4. Life Cycle Inventory Analysis (LCIA)

The environmental relevance of all the inputs and outputs of edible flowers production was assessed

^[21]

, so to understand how great was their contribution to the overall environmental load

^[15]

. To quantify the environmental impacts, data previously collected were classified into different environmental issues of concerns as Impact Categories. The contribution of each emission to a certain impact category was evaluated through an equivalence factor that expresses its effects in relation with a reference parameter

^[15][36]

. For this case study, four Impact Categories were chosen:

• Global Warming Potential (GWP). It is used to estimate the contribution of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, hexafluoride, etc.) to the greenhouse effect ^[31][37]. The emissions are measured in terms of the reference gas CO₂, and expressed in kg of CO₂ equivalent (CO₂ eq) ^[37].

• Acidification Potential (AP). Acidification is a phenomenon whereby precipitation is unusually acidic (it has substandard levels of pH). Acid rain is caused by emissions of SO
• ₂, NO_X, and NH₃. The AP is measured in kg of sulphur - dioxide equivalent (SO₂ eq) ^[37].

• Eutrophication Potential (EP). EP measures the emissions into water of phosphates and nitrates, causing an abnormal proliferation of vegetation in the aquatic ecosystem. It is expressed in kg of PO
• ₄
• ^3- eq ^[37].

• Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). Photochemical ozone is formed by the reaction of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the presence of heat and sunlight, forming the ozone in the troposphere. It is usually expressed in kg of ethylene equivalent (C
• ₂
• H
• ₄ eq) ^[37].

In order to have a clearer way to interpret data, each one of the two species of edible flowers was divided into three groups: (i) large container (LC) containing 25 g of flowers, (ii) small container (SC) containing 12.5 g of flowers, and (iii) potted plant (PP).

5. Interpretation

5. Interpretation

It presents the results of the study through the Impact Categories and suggests some possible measures to reduce the burden on the environment

^[21][38]

.

The life cycle inventory analysis (LCIA) results per gram of freshly harvested flowers showed that the production of

V. cornuta

edible flowers resulted in a higher environmental impact than the wax begonias’ one in the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and in the Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) indicators, regardless of the type of final product. On the contrary,

B. semperflorens’

production cycle showed higher values than violas in the Acidification Potential (AP) and in the Eutrophication Potential (EP) indicators, probably because there were fewer wax begonia plants in the greenhouse than viola ones, thus worse absorption of the nutrients in the substrate, causing a slightly higher impact of wax begonias in the AP and EP categories.

All indicators evaluated showed lower emissions values for the potted plant (PP) product (which did not include the post-harvest phases in its production cycle, thus needing less resources) than the container (LC and SC) product, both for wax begonias and violas. Regarding

B. semperflorens

, the percentage increase from the potted plant to the flowers’ container ranged from 10% to 15% among the impact categories, while concerning

V. cornuta

, the percentage increase from the potted plant to the flowers’ container ranged from 8% to 17% among the impact categories.

As far as the flowers’ containers are concerned, lower impacts were obtained using the large plastic container rather than the small one: wax begonias percentage increase from the large container to the small one ranged from 3% to 5% among the impact categories, while violas percentage increase ranged from 3% to 6% among the impact categories. Actually, 1 g of fresh flowers packed in small containers and then in polystyrene packaging showed higher values in all the four impact categories evaluated than 1 g of fresh flowers packed in large containers.

In conclusion, this work showed that the production of only the large containers should be a way to reduce the emissions in the post-harvest phase (diminishing the amount of plastic used), even if probably this would not be economically sustainable for the nursery as normally the private customers prefer small containers of fresh flowers.

Additionally, the nursery could increase the sale of flowering potted plants, as they require fewer resources, and there is a minor use of packaging, highly reducing the need of post-harvest treatments, thus reducing the environmental burden.

Moreover, the consumer can diminish food wastes, leaving on the plant the flowers he does not need. However, a consumer who buys a potted plant can only have one flower species and a minor number of flowers to use, if compared with the variety and the grams packed in a container. Probably this solution too would not be economically advantageous for the nursery.

Bio-degradable plastic packaging could be adopted, so that the end of life could have a minor impact on the environment

^[39]

.

The use of biodegradable pots

^[40]

 could reduce the impacts by reducing the use of plastic pots, even though some of these pots show unsuitable mechanical performances, and they are more expensive than plastic pots

^[40]

.

Lastly, the use of biodegradable and bio-based foam for cushioning packaging instead of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) could be another option, using renewable and more sustainable raw materials (biomass instead of fossil fuel) and reducing landfill disposal

^[41]

.

As highlighted, there are great opportunities to reduce emissions in edible flower’s production; thus, it could be interesting to enlarge this environmental analysis to the whole of the edible flower productive chain, through a “cradle to grave” approach, thus also considering the impacts related to the distribution of the edible flower’s product to the final consumer, consumption, conservation or waste of edible flowers, and ultimate disposal of the packaging, in order to have a complete overview of this emerging type of food product. The scientific data about the environmental pressure of the different edible flower products could also help consumers to make more informed and sustainable choices.

The full article can be found here: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/4/579