1. Introduction

  Placentas are most diverse organs across mammalian species. Although the mammals obtained several new genes specific to pregnancy recognition and/or maintenance, the diversity ofwhich are often species’ specific, gene expressions for placental structures cannot be explained through the expression and functions of functional genesdevelopment and/or their structural diversity have not been well characterized. It has long been thought that viral/transposon components exist in organism’ genomes. In 2000, Mi et al. found that endogenous retrovirus (ERV, Syncytin-1) exists in the human placenta [1]. Since then, ssyncytin-tyncytin-likpe ERV structures and their functions have been reported in many animal species ^[1][2][3][2][3][4], but none of them contain the same nucleotide structures, strongly suggesting that these ERVs are independently captured and integrated into mammalian genomes ^[4][5].

2. Placental Diversity in mammals

  Mammalian placentas are extraordinarily diverse in terms of cell types, structure and their association with maternal blood, although placentas play the same roles such as physical and immunological protection against the maternal immune system, nutrient and gas exchanges, and endocrinological regulation [6]. During the last several decades, scientists in developmental biology and/or virologists have occasionally proposed retrovirus’s role in placental evolution. For example, Haig (2012) proposed that the placenta became a mammalian tissue in which retroviral genes were domesticated to serve an adaptive function in the host [7]. Such an interplay may have contributed to evolutionally mechanisms associated with genomic imprinting of numerous genes.

--Please upload the attached figure here--

Fin thgure Initial Formation of Mammalian Placentaslegend: Mammalian placentas as classified by the distribution of chorionic villi. A: Diffuse placentas to which pigs and horses belong. B: Cotyledonary placentas, commonly found in ruminant ungulates. C: Zonary placentas to which dogs and cats belong. D: Discoid placentas, seen in murine and primate species including humans.

3. Involvement of PEG10/PEG11/RTL1 in the initial placenta formation, syncytin-type genes in their structural diversity, and gene usage/regulation in placental environments

  Imprinting genes such as those of paternally expressed genes, PEG10 ^[5][8] and PEG11/RTL1 ^[6][9], have been extensively studied for their contribution to the evolutionand tl development of mammalian species. Through gene ablation studies, these genes are found necessary for the formation of placental structures ^[7][8][10][11]. Because PEG10 is acquired more than 146 million years ago, PEG10 gene could explain the initial formation of placentas in mammals. However, plastrucenttural diversity caof placentas cannot be explained through the integration and function of PEG10 and PEG11/RTL1 genes. The rphylogesearchers have presennetic record shows multiple independent instances of syncytin-typed ERV rgenecent and related findings that explain how syncytin s’ entry into disparate clades over the last 50 million years [5], strongly suggesting that syncytin-type genes as pre involved in placentime candidates for the emergence of structural diversity. The researchers presented recent observations on ERVs and howfication of mammalian placentas. Recently, more and more data have been accumulated, demonstrating that syncytin-thesype ERVs control gene expression of both functional genes as well as ERV themselves ^[9][10][12][13]. It is Basedoften observed that ERV integrations the receninto mammalian genomes proceed successively: one ERV exaptation infs followed by successive invasions of new ERVs. The new interloper rmation,etroviral genes may subsume the resole previous ERVs playearcd. Thers hase ongoing and successive pERV acquisitions for thesented the baton- establishment of more advantageous systems are explained by “a baton pass hypothesis” [14].

  In general, the placentas have lower DNA methylation levels than embryos, allowing freer expression of ERVs and transposons during gestation, thereby faccessive inilitating selection of advantageous genes from a wider market. Such extraembryonic circumstances might have allowed for not only domestication of ERVs to egrstablish novel endogenous genes via multiple of selections but also the dissemination of ERVERVs and transposons throughout genomes ^[11]as trand new models explaining placental diversityscriptional regulators. Similarly, various degrees of maternal-fetal cell interactions in the uterine compartment may have led to change in kinds and degree of gene usage [7], possibly resulting in cellular and morphological changes in placentas. It is interesting to speculate that the placentas themselves might have served as an evolutionary laboratory to promote mammalian evolution [15].

4. New models explaining placental diversity

F  The ousogenic activity in the ter most cell layer at the fetal side of placentas is called “trophectoderm”. Across mammalian species, the trophectoderm eal cells exhibits a great deal of similarity across speciesfusogenic activity, notwithstanding the huge diversity in placental structures and type of placentation such as invasive (humans and murine) or non-invasive (pigs and ruminants) to the maternal endometrium. Based on actual experimentation and typical amino acid sequences, ERVs’ their functions are generally limited to fusogenic activity and immunotolerance, which on their own are not sufficient to fully explain the structural diversity of placentas.

  Dunn-Fletcher and colleagues (2018) have demonstrated that retroviral THE1B sequence serves as a cis-element for the regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) gene expression [16]. Recently, progress has been made on research into ERV sequences serving as transcriptional and translational regulators ^[9][10][12][13]. These sequences could be co-opted for newly integrated retroviral gene regulation.

  Nevertheless, solid confirmation of a retrovirus integration into sperm or egg has not been obtained, and the mechanism of integration remains unclear. The rarity of such events owes in no small part to the narrow windows of possibility for infection, but conversion to active ERVs is also contingent on the perfect confluence of criteria as follows:

1. The insertion of ERVs can make functional genes of the host placenta-specific. i.e., Fematirn-1 integration into the intron 18 of pregnancy specific FAT2
2. Its own LTR is sufficient to transcribe its own gene segments, which serves as the cis-acting element(s), resulting in the activation of a host gene. i.e., IFNG, THE1B on CRH.
3. It can make use of transcription factors utilized by the pre-existing gene, as per the baton-pass hypothesis. i.e., A transcription factor GCM1 for syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.
4. The ERV is co-opted along with its promoter/enhancer in the integrated genome; i.e., SPRE (syncytin post-transcriptional regulatory element).
5. There is cooperation with miRNAs and/or lncRNAs, yet not definitely characterized under placental/trophectodermal conditions, either alone or together with ERV

In  a) gThener insertion of ERVs can make functional, the genes of the host placentas have-specific.

  lower  DNA me   i.e., Fematirn-1 inthylegration levels than embryos, allowing freer expression ofinto the intron 18 of pregnancy specific ERVsFAT2 agende.

  b) Itransposons during gestation, thereby facilitating selection of advantageous own LTR is sufficient to transcribe its genes from a wider market. Such extraembryonic circumstances might have allowed for not only domestic segments, which serves as the cis-acting element(s), resulting in the activation of ERVsa tho establish novelst gene.

       i.endogenous., IFNG, THE1B on CRH.

  c) It gecanes via multiple of selections but also the dissemination of make use of transcription factors utilized by the pre-existing gene, ERVas andper transposons throughouthe baton-pass hypothesis.

    g i.enomes as., A transcriptional regulators. Mor factor GCM1 for syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.

  d) Theover, ERV is could serve as cis- and/or trans-acting factors for functional genes-opted along with its promoter/enhancer in the integrated genome.

  of  the host. Similarly, various degrees of maternal-fetal cell interactions in the uterine compartment may i.e., Syncytin post-transcriptional regulatory element (SPRE).

  e) Thave led to change in kinds and degree of gene usage ^[12]ere is cooperation with miRNAs and/or lncRNAs, possibly resulting in cellular and morphological changes in et not definitely characterized under placentas. It is interesting to speculate that the placentas themselves might have served as an evolutionary laboratory to promote mammalian evolutionl/trophectodermal conditions, either alone or together with        ^[13]. ERV

5. Conclusion

  It is now clear that the emergence of mammalian placentas was made possible with the acquisition of therian PEG10 and eutherian PEG11/RTL1 genes, followed by independent, yet successive integrations of syncytin-type ERV genes. for sStructural variations in mammalian placentas could have been obtained through ERVs’ own functions as well as the regulation of functional genes and/or ERVs themselves. A question still arises as to whether the placental structures that we know now are the ultimate forms or are still evolving. If the latter is the case, placental structures may still be diversifying and new variations could be awaiting discovery

Related refences

1. Mi, S.; Lee, X.; Li, X.; Veldman, G.M.; Finnerty, H.; Racie, L.; LaVallie, E.; Tang, X.Y.; Edouard, P.; Howes, S.; et al. Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature 2000, 403, 785–789.
2. Baba, K.; Nakaya, Y.; Shojima, T.; Muroi, Y.; Kizaki, K.; Hashizume, K.; Imakawa, K.; Miyazawa, T. Identification of novel endogenous betaretroviruses which are transcribed in the bovine placenta. Virol. 2011, 85, 1237–1245.
3. Dewannieux, M.; Heidmann, T. Endogenous retroviruses: Acquisition, amplification and taming of genome invaders. Opin. Virol. 2013, 3, 646–656.
4. Cornelis, G.; Heidmann, O.; Degrelle, S.A.; Vernochet, C.; Lavialle, C.; Letzelter, C.; Bernard-Stoecklin, S.; Hassanin, A.; Mulot, B.; Guillomot, M.; et al. Captured retroviral envelope syncytin gene associated with the unique placental structure of higher ruminants. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E828–E837.
5. Nakagawa, S.; Bai, H.; Sakurai, T.; Nakaya, Y.; Konno, T.; Miyazawa, T.; Gojobori, T.; Imakawa, K. Dynamic evolution of endogenous retrovirus-derived genes expressed in bovine conceptuses during the period of placentation. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5, 296–306.
6. Senger, P.L. Pathways to pregnancy and parturition. 2^nd edition, Current Conceptions, Inc., 2005.
7. Haig, D. Retroviruses and the placenta. Curr. Biol., 2012, 22, R609-R613.
8. Ono, R.; Kobayashi, S.; Wagatsuma, H.; Aisaka, K.; Kohda, T.; Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. A retrotransposon-derived gene, PEG10, is a novel imprinted gene located on human chromosome 7q21. Genomics 2001, 73, 232–237.
9. Charlier, C.; Segers, K.; Wagenaar, D.; Karim, L.; Berghmans, S.; Jaillon, O.; Shay, T.; Weissenbach, J.; Cockett, N.; Gyapay, G.; et al. Human-ovine comparative sequencing of a 250-kb imprinted domain encompassing the callipyge (clpg) locus and identification of six imprinted transcripts: DLK1, DAT, GTL2, PEG11, antiPEG11, and MEG8. Res. 2001, 11, 850–862.
10. Ono, R.; Nakamura, K.; Inoue, K.; Naruse, M.; Usami, T.; Wakisaka-Saito, N.; Hino, T.; Suzuki-Migishima, R.; Ogonuki, N.; Miki, H.; et al. Deletion of Peg10, an imprinted gene acquired from a retrotransposon, causes early embryonic lethality. Genet. 2006, 38, 101–106.
11. Sekita, Y.; Wagatsuma, H.; Nakamura, K.; Ono, R.; Kagami, M.; Wakisaka, N.; Hino, T.; Suzuki-Migishima, R.; Kohda, T.; Ogura, A.; et al. Role of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, Rtl1, in the feto-maternal interface of mouse placenta. Genet. 2008, 40, 243–248.
12. Chuong, E.B. The placenta goes viral: Retroviruses control gene expression in pregnancy. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e3000028.
13. Kitao, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Miyazawa, T. An ancient retroviral RNA element hidden in mammalian genomes and its involvement in co-opted retroviral gene regulation. Retrovirology 2021, 18, 36.
14. Imakawa, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Miyazawa, T. Baton pass hypothesis: Successive incorporation of unconserved endogenous retroviral genes for placentation during mammalian evolution. Genes Cells 2015, 20, 771–788.
15. Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. Mammalian-specific genomic functions: Newly acquired traits generated by genomic imprinting and LTR retrotransposon-derived genes in mammals. Jpn Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2015, 91, 511-538.
16. Dunn-Fletcher, C.E.; Muglia, L.M.; Pavlicev, M.; Wolf, G.; Sun, M.A.; Hu, Y.C.; Huffman, E.; Tumukuntala, S.; Thiele, K.; Mukherjee, A.; et al. Anthropoid primate-specific retroviral element THE1B controls expression of CRH in placenta and alters gestation length. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2006337.