Research on happiness, especially with regard to its psychosocial as well as biological implications or its differentiation from satisfaction have gained momentum in recent years ^[1][2][3][1,2,3]. Today, happiness can be viewed as a highly relevant phenomenon: Happiness “makes sense” from a biological point of view and is not restricted to humans in principle [4]. Hence, happiness is not “intellectual”; it is not constructed or cognitive. Primarily, it is a feeling, not a thought, and it is also physical at the same time, that is, based on the motivational and reward system inside the brain ^[5][6][5,6]. Here, cognitive or evaluative parts are downstream, i.e., secondary or associative in nature [7].

The biology of happiness follows rather objective criteria. There is an overarching goal (e.g., survival, reproduction, behavior control ^[7][8][7,8]) that, if necessary, can override subjective or individual goals. Ideally, however, the primary (objective) and the secondary (subjective, subsequent) goals are aligned, that is, well-coordinated with one another. With regard to these secondary parts, study participants give different statements in surveys on the subject of happiness: When asked about their secondary assessment of happiness, respondents give answers that frequently diverge from those who had been queried about their primary feelings, i.e., about the direct experience in actual (happy) moments (c.f., subjective well-being (SWB) as a cognitive construct in contrast to the current emotional state or the mood in any given, immediate moment) ^[7][9][10][7,9,10].

Hence, happiness is not just a “good feeling”. Much more, it carries along strong biological cues and values. It provides inner guidelines, i.e., directions, and lets us humans plan or implement behaviors from which researcherswe hope to derive a desired (beneficial) outcome ^[2][5][6][8][2,5,6,8]. Therefore, the feeling of happiness—if based on an experience that has already been made before (i.e., memorized, conditioned, and also linked to it: a positive expectation for the future)—is an efficient way of integrating or automating experiences made earlier into behavioral or treatment concepts that can be quickly implemented and activated (i.e., short-cut) ^[8][11][12][8,11,12].

Happiness as a biological concept was passed on genetically and further developed in evolution ^{[4][7][13][14][15]}[4,7,13,14,15]. It has a biomolecular basis yet is used for autoregulation and survival (of the individual and of the species) ^{[5][7][12][16][17]}[5,7,12,16,17]. Happiness can thus be measured (e.g., in the brain, blood; see below) and is associated with biophysiological changes in the body ^{[7][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]}[7,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. At its core, happiness, as is the case with the entire body (the living organism), is dynamic by nature and is subject to cyclical or internal “maturation processes” (see below). Thus, an interesting question coupled to this is whether happiness or its trajectories can actually be trained, i.e., actively be altered, for example, through positive psychology programs, contemplative or meditative practices.

Happiness as a natural, biologically “meaningful” phenomenon—a positive, pleasurable, or rewarding state that makes individuals feel, i.e., emotionally realize, an inner “calling”: a confirmation to show us what is supposedly good or biologically beneficial for us—in this moment or over time. Happiness thus (invisibly) controls people'sour behavior. People'sOur SWB is based on this, yet subsequently dependent on it.

Happiness is therefore neurobiologically “produced” in the brain by the reward and motivation systems. ResWearchers surmise that each of these “happy” mood states has a specific representation—i.e., a corresponding, analogous activation pattern—in the brain (see below). Since these states (patterns and pathways) are also related, e.g., to addiction or other external phenomena (i.e., drugs) ^[5][7][5,7], there can be negative, less beneficial interactions with behavior regarding the fact that these do not necessarily always have to be medically healthy (see below). This applies in particular to sub-forms of happiness, such as those associated with ecstasy or wanting (type A), or those directly related to stress (type B)—as it will be described in the next section.

Hence, the “hardware” for happiness is innate (albeit variable, in moderation), yet the “software” or operating systems are regularly updated through their use: what makes peopleus happy is individual (to a large extent), but the structures and functions seem universal.

As stated above, happiness describes a feeling that is manifested biophysiologically in the brain, mind, and body. The feeling that comes along with it serves to memorize its initial occurrence and its antecedent, i.e., the contexts that led to or accompanied it. By this mechanism, “happy events” not only become conditioned and reinforced (i.e., learning and wanting to experience them again) yet they also become stored in memory together with an emotional “tag” for better and faster retrieval of the stored information later on, i.e., when it is biologically required or circumstances trigger memories of the initial event [7]. As with happiness, behaviors (and so: lifestyles, health behaviors) are shaped by implicit emotions and autonomous, unconscious processes (i.e., non-cognitive motives) rather than by metacognition or cognitive willpower (e.g., see ^{[8][25][26][27][28][29]}[8,25,26,27,28,29]). In fact, health behaviors that are experienced as pleasant are more likely to be repeated (e.g., ^{[5][30][31][32][33]}[5,30,31,32,33]). To better understand the underlying mechanisms of reward and behavioral motivation, including their neurobiological significance, I suggest distinguishing between three types of motivational states, namely, (A) approach motivation, (B) avoidance motivation, and (C) assertion motivation (Figure 1). The rationale behind this distinction and their implications will be explained in the following.

Motivation describes processes that represent the core of biological, cognitive, and social regulation [5], including the regulation of intensity of behavior that leads to the attainment of a particular goal or stimulus [34]. RWesearchers define stimuli as concrete physical objects, mental representations or memories of such objects, abstract concepts, or possibilities that are expected to occur in the future ^[35][36][37][35,36,37]. The pursuit (effect) of stimuli is based on affects (or “basic emotions”, see ^[38][39][38,39]) and can be automatic and occur with or without awareness. When cognitively processed, reswearchers may call these stimuli “goals”. Thus, behavior can be stimulus-driven (affective) or goal-directed (cognitive) [40], with the prior occurring most often (e.g., [8]). Motivational salience is the attribute of a stimulus and can be appetitive, aversive [34], or assertive ^[7][41][7,41]. However, the existing literature does not sufficiently differentiate between assertive and appetitive motivation; usually, both fall under the umbrella term “approach motivation”. As noted earlier, I now suggest distinguishing three types of motivational processes (ABC), since they involve different physiological/neurobiological mechanisms (Figure 1).

2.1. Approach Motivation

Approach motivation, or appetitive (incentive) salience, is directed towards stimuli or goals that are related to positive, hedonic, pleasant processes ^[5][36][42][5,36,42] and functionally linked to the wanting system, i.e., reward expectation, performance and action [7]. This type of motivation is sometimes also referred to as “wanting motivation” [7]. If approach motivation (appetite, wanting) has led to the achievement of a stimulus or goal, a reward is experienced as a pleasant feeling (which, depending on the intensity of the experience, can also go unnoticed). The stimulus (goal) itself does not serve as a reward. Instead, reinforcement occurs either via psychological and related neurobiological processes that take place during one’s anticipatory (expectant) state and/or as a response to the actual stimulus or goal ^[43][44][43,44]. Individuals continually evaluate stimuli and determine them to be either beneficial or detrimental [36]. These evaluations are often perceived as basic affective experiences ^{[36][45][46][47][48]}[36,45,46,47,48]. Simply put, approach motivation emphasizes the expectation of a reward in form of pleasant feelings, or positive affect, e.g., joy, pleasure, and excitement. Underlying the concepts of motivation are physiological mechanisms that occur in brain areas distinct from other sensory or cognitive areas ^[5][7][49][5,7,49]. An integral part of the central nervous system (CNS), approach motivation and reward systems are neurons that have their principal origin in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), located in the midbrain ^[5][12][5,12]. These neurons send projections, e.g., to the frontolimbic brain, mostly to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) ^[50][51][50,51]. By this, the midbrain and the frontolimbic systems are “wired” together; this is known as mesolimbic coupling. When a stimulus is paired with a reward initially or when a reward is anticipated in response to a stimulus based on past experience, via the mesolimbic pathway with its essential neurotransmitter dopamine, VTA and NAcc become connected and activated ^[52][53][52,53], i.e., “dopaminergic activation promotes positive feelings” [7]. The NAcc hence signals the desire to obtain a reward and the degree of effort to do so, i.e., it determines appetitive motivational salience. In addition, reward is also measured and regulated by the VTA-NAcc pathway—it signals to other brain areas how rewarding an activity is [5]. The intensity of an expected reward, consequently, determines how likely it is that a person will remember and repeat it [12]. Here, the hippocampus, as part of the (para)limbic system, serves as the point of entry for experiences to be recognized and remembered ^[5][54][5,54]. Additionally, by also involving the amygdala, people'sur brain categorizes and remembers experiences as pleasant or detrimental within the endogenous reward system, which in turn facilitates the pairing between experiences and other stimuli ^[12][50][51][12,50,51]. Such information is also processed via the mesocortical (mesofrontal) dopamine pathway in the frontal cortex, which is integral to weighing one’s personal “costs” (disadvantages) against the likelihood of reward. Whether the behavior is ultimately performed or not is determined by these dynamic processes of deliberation, with the hedonic value driving the wanting, i.e., the appetite and approach motivation ^[8][12][8,12].

2.2. Avoidance Motivation

Aversive motivational, or negatively-valenced “fearful” salience, is related to the avoidance of pain or threat (i.e., threat avoidance) and punishment (i.e., consequences that diminish the chance of the reoccurrence of a behavior), and it corresponds with the fight-flight-freeze system (i.e., stress physiology, stress response) ^{[5][7][42][55]}[5,7,42,55]. It is usually triggered by an aversive stimulus and is motivated by a desire to attain relief from undesirable circumstances. Punishment, which is also linked to a reduced response strength (i.e., passive avoidance), can further be distinguished from negative reinforcement, the latter of which is related to an increased response strength (i.e., active avoidance) [44]. Thus, in comparison to active fear reactions (e.g., fight or flight) resulting from fearful stimuli, passive responses (e.g., freezing) can also occur [56]. Anxiety, fear, and disgust are examples of negative affects associated with avoidance motivation ^{[7][36][45][57][58][59]}[7,36,45,57,58,59]. Functionally embedded in the stress system, avoidance motivation is related to increased sympathetic and stress activity (i.e., activated stress responses), including the release of cortisol, (nor-) adrenaline, as well as, e.g., opioids and vasopressin [7]. Anatomically, it is rooted in the lower limbic system, primarily in the amygdala and hypothalamus (connected to the pituitary gland) [12]. Two central signaling pathways are activated when threat is anticipated: One pathway involves the hypothalamus, which receives its impulses from cortical, subcortical, limbic and brainstem areas, and leads to the pituitary gland, where (pre-) hormones are released into the blood, triggering the release, e.g., of cortisol from the adrenal cortex. Cortisol is particularly responsible for providing energy for “fight and flight” [7]. The other pathway acts via the sympathetic autonomous nervous system. Here, too, the hypothalamus, but above all the brainstem and the brain’s catecholamine systems, are crucial. From here, nerve impulses are directly (neuronally) transmitted to the peripheral organs and the adrenal medulla. The stress hormone adrenaline (or noradrenaline) is released from there. This second pathway is the faster, more direct one, and particularly affects the circulatory and organ functions ^[7][12][7,12]. In addition, the freeze response, as mentioned above, is functionally embedded in the CNS amygdala circuitry [60]. In the context of successful passive or active threat avoidance, the modulation of the various signaling pathways involved ultimately leads to the perception of relief, which is a positive, low-arousal basic emotion/affect ^[61][62][61,62], corresponding with one’s original (conscious or unconscious) intention, i.e., to survive. Indeed, when the aversive stimulus is discontinued, actively or passively, relief occurs [63]. Psychologically, relief results from the reduced impact of a negative stimulus and can be experienced as relaxation and/or reward, i.e., “no more stress” ^{[6][12][64][65]}[6,12,64,65]. Relief is also experienced when the activity of the amygdala is reduced ^[7][12][7,12]. This, too, signals (or is the biological consequence of) less or “no stress”—which, again, could be an active or a passive process. Furthermore, rwesearchers see a connection between approach and avoidance motivation systems here: Results, e.g., from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based studies suggest that corresponding brain areas are activated during relief and other positive affects (e.g., see ^[66][67][66,67]).

2.3. Assertion Motivation

As described above, the majority of previously published research on motivation and reward does not distinguish between behavior driven by approach versus assertion motivation. In fact, these constructs or states are often confounded or merged with each other [41], even though they reflect different neurobiological processes, are originating from distinct areas of the brain, and have different behavioral consequences ^[7][8][7,8]. Assertion motivation, or assertive salience, is associated with the “non-wanting” system or “non-wanting motivation”, hence with inaction (i.e., staying), acceptance or contentedness, and quiescence. It characterizes the motivation to maintain a certain condition or state ^[7][41][7,41]; the associated positive valence is contentment. The assertion motivation differs from the approach motivation with regard to the affective qualities involved ^[7][41][7,41]. Furthermore, assertion motivation can also be distinguished from approach motivation in terms of different automatic responses and behavioral outcomes. Assertion motivation is based on the lack of a goal-directed, recognizable action (neither having to get somewhere nor having to get away), because one has purposefully (explicitly) or unconsciously (implicitly) consented to remaining in the current state, for example, a newly habituated health behavior. Consenting to the current state can be experienced as being “perfectly happy”, or content, having no intention to change it or move away from it, or shift one’s attention towards some other thing or place. Hence, by being in congruence with or in full acceptance of the present moment, this state of non-wanting also entails a feeling of “mindful” connectedness (an alignment with the “here and now”), and the underlying system is thus sometimes called the “affiliation system” [7]. Unsurprisingly, mindfulness or meditation practices seem to facilitate this kind of experience ^[68][69][68,69]. Functionally embedded within the parasympathetic autonomous nervous system, the assertive motivational state is linked to increased parasympathetic or vagus nerve activity and is therefore associated with a physio-psychological down-regulation, and states of relaxation ^{[70][71][72][73]}[70,71,72,73]. At the level of neurotransmitter systems, assertive salience is associated with endogenous opiates, oxytocin, acetylcholine, serotonin, as well as endocannabinoid signaling ^{[7][12][20][69][74][75][76]}[7,12,20,69,74,75,76]. Unlike approach and avoidance motivation systems, the assertion motivation system is not characterized by an involvement of dopamine—instead, it is linked to the absence or inhibition of dopaminergic activation. Thus, individuals here experience no motivation to change the status quo by generating or avoiding new experiences through behavior change. Brain areas involved in the activation of assertive motivation include, but are not limited to, the midbrain, the vagus areas, brainstem, cingulum, hippocampus and ventral striatum, as well as the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland [7].