Factors responsible for gender differences in immune response are illustrated in Figure 1.
2. Primary Biliary Cholangitis
A significant female preponderance is a well-known clinical feature of PBC, whereas differences between sexes in the clinical presentation at PBC diagnosis are not so well-defined. Twelve studies including 51,290 PBC patients worldwide were analyzed to evaluate sex-related differences at PBC diagnosis
[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Seven studies showed that male sex is associated with delayed diagnosis and, consequently, older age at PBC identification
[31][34][35][36][38][40][41][40,43,44,45,47,49,50]. Six studies showed that male patients received PBC diagnosis at more advanced and severe liver disease with cirrhosis and its decompensation events, as well as portal hypertension signs
[32][33][35][36][39][42][41,42,44,45,48,51]. Three studies found that male PBC patients presented with worse liver biochemistries
[34][35][42][43,44,51]. Finally, six studies showed that fatigue is more associated with female sex at PBC presentation
[32][33][35][36][39][42][41,42,44,45,48,51]. Furthermore, Marzioni et al. analyzed data from electronic medical records of patients from 900 general practitioners in Italy, identifying 412 PBC patients and showing that osteoporosis, inflammatory arthritis and other connective tissue diseases were significantly more common in women, whereas inflammatory bowel diseases were significantly more common in men (
p < 0.01)
[43][52].
The clinical impact of PBC is highly variable, and one of the most important factors contributing to this variability is the response to primary therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)
[44][53]. Several studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of UDCA therapy strongly determines long-term outcomes
[44][45][46][53,54,55]. Moreover, many studies have evaluated the role of sex in the response to UDCA therapy, although results are conflicting because of small sample size, retrospectivity and different criteria used to determine response. Eleven studies including 9748 patients with PBC were analyzed
[31][39][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][40,48,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. All of these studies, except one
[50][59], evaluated the impact of sex on UDCA therapy response. In particular, four of studies showed that no response to UDCA is more frequent in the male than female sex
[31][47][48][49][40,56,57,58]. However, although these studies presented large sample sizes (7677 PBC patients), they evaluated response to UDCA with four different criteria, and this heterogeneity makes the results not comparable. Particularly, Carbone et al.
[31][40] used the UK-PBC cohort to evaluate UDCA response with Paris I criteria and demonstrated that sex is an independent predictor of therapy failure. Instead, Cheung et al.
[47][56] analyzed the largest cohort of PBC patients utilizing the GLOBE score criteria. Finally, Lammert et al.
[48][57] used the Toronto criteria, and Tian et al.
[49][58] utilized a combination of the Barcelona and Paris I criteria. A similar heterogeneity in the evaluation of UDCA response was observed in six, studies showing that sex has no impact on response to therapy
[39][46][51][52][53][54][48,55,60,61,62,63]. In 2016, obeticholic acid (OCA) was approved as a second-line therapy in PBC patients with inadequate response or intolerant to UDCA
[55][64]. Four studies evaluated the response to OCA therapy according to POISE criteria
[56][57][58][59][65,66,67,68]. Only D’Amato et al.
[59][68] considered the role of sex in OCA therapy and showed that sex has no impact on inadequate response to OCA.
There is currently little information available regarding the exact magnitude of HCC risk in PBC patients according to sex. A recent meta-analysis evaluating 18 studies examining the incidence of HCC in PBC patients according to sex showed a pooled HCC incidence rate of 9.82 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 5.92–16.28) in men and 3.82 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 2.85–5.11) in women, with moderate-to-high between-study heterogeneity
[60][69]. Additionally, Trivedi et al. showed that HCC incidence was higher in male UDCA non-responders versus responders (HR 4.44, 95% CI 1.29 to 10.20;
p < 0.001) in a cohort of 4565 PBC patients
[61][70]. Moreover, Harada et al. found that the cumulative incidence of HCC was 6.5% in males and 2.0% in females (
p < 0.0001) during the 10 years after PBC diagnosis, indicating that male PBC patients had a 3.3-fold higher risk of HCC compared with female PBC patients
[62][71]. Nonetheless, although PBC primarily affects females, the authors postulated that HCC might be more common in male PBC patients because of a lack of estrogen-mediated prevention. In females, the HCC incidence gradually increased according to histological stage, indicating that the terminal stage of PBC, which is a cirrhotic state, may be a risk factor for HCC development in females, whereas males are likely to develop HCC at any stage
[62][71].
The role of sex in the prognosis of PBC patients has been widely evaluated. Seven studies analyzing the presence of ACLD were considered
[33][36][39][42][46][47][63][42,45,48,51,55,56,72]. All of them showed that the presence of ACLD was more frequent in male than in female patients. In particular, Cheung et al.
[47][56] and Marschall et al.
[33][42] demonstrated that male sex had a higher prevalence of portal hypertension and liver decompensation. Moreover, Adejumo et al.
[63][72] showed that male sex had higher risk of jaundice, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute liver failure, whereas female sex had a higher risk of hospitalizations. Furthermore, 11 studies evaluated the role of sex in mortality for PBC patients
[33][38][39][41][44][46][47][64][65][66][67][42,47,48,50,53,55,56,73,74,75,76]. Eight of these studies demonstrated that males have a higher risk of mortality. In particular, John et al.
[46][55] showed that male sex is a risk factor for death, liver-related mortality and liver decompensation. Lleo et al.
[65][74] demonstrated that male sex was associated to an increased risk of all-cause mortality.
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
PSC is considered an immune-mediated disease with atypical features, including prevalence in men, the absence of disease-specific autoantibodies and poor response to immunosuppression. Regarding gender distribution, PSC affects men prevalently; in a large regional population study from Sweden, the mean crude annual incidence of PSC was 1.22 per 100,000 in the total population aged ≥18 years in the period from 1992 to 2005; among men and women, the incidence was 1.8 and 0.7, respectively. The point prevalence of PSC in the same population was 16 (24 among men and 9 among women) per 100,000, and the proportion of men was 71%
[68][77]. In other nations, proportion of men ranged from 51% in New Zealand
[69][78] to 71% in the USA
[70][79] and in Norway
[8][10]. Similarly, in a recent data collection from the National Rare Diseases Registry (RNMR) and the National Mortality Database (NMD) in Italy, 60% of new PSC diagnoses were in male patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1
[71][80]. Mean age at disease onset was 33 years (SD = 17), and mean age at diagnosis was 37 years. There were no statistically significant differences in age at diagnosis, age at onset and diagnostic delay between male and female patients. In other studies, the median age at PSC onset was generally higher in women than men; a large cohort study from Germany published in 2018 evaluated patients with late disease onset (defined as first diagnosis after 50 years), revealing that the proportion of females was significantly higher in the late-onset group compared with the earlier-onset group (50/183 (27%) vs. 15/32 (47%),
p = 0.02)
[72][81]. A study population from Sweden was reported to have a time-trend increase in the incidence of large-duct PSC among women but not among men; conversely, the incidence of small-duct PSC increased significantly among men but not among women. Diverging trends were also observed for the incidence of PSC related to IBD, with a significant increase in the incidence of PSC-IBD in women, whereas in men, an increase in PSC without IBD was observed
[68][77].
Patients with PSC are at increased risk of developing several hepatobiliary cancers, mainly cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder and colon cancer—and hepatocellular carcinoma to a lesser degree.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a model of malignancies occurring in the inflammatory background. Chronic inflammation of the biliary tree induced by PSC promotes oncogenesis and predisposes to development of CCA through DNA damage, cellular proliferation and oxidative stress
[73][74][82,83]. The annual risk for CCA in PSC is approximately 2%, with a 10- and 30-year cumulative incidence of 6–11% and 20%, respectively, and an increase of 400-fold when compared with the general population
[75][76][84,85]. Regarding the sex-specific risk of CCA development, female sex seems to be associated with a lower risk of CCA (HR,0.68;
p < 0.001, respectively), as reported in the data from a large international PSC cohort, which included 7121 patients encompassing >30 years of clinical observation. According to multivariate analysis, advancing age at diagnosis is an independent risk factor of CCA development, whereas female sex and having small-duct disease or CD at the time of PSC diagnosis are protective factors against CCA development
[77][86].
Inflammatory bowel disease occurs in 70–80% of patients with PSC, and PSC seems to confer additional risk of developing
colorectal cancer (CRC) when compared with the risk in patients with IBD alone
[78][79][87,88]. CRC can appear in up to 20–30% of PSC-IBD patients, and an annual colonoscopy is recommended
[80][89].
In 2020, a nationwide population-based study from national healthcare registries in England identified incident cases of IBD with and without PSC over ten years; the study showed that patients with PSC-IDB younger than 40 years old had a fourfold higher risk of CRC, whereas there was no difference between groups for patients in which the IBD diagnosis was made in patients older than 60 years. Regarding sex differences, the risk for CRC was significantly lower among women than men (HR 0.46
p < 0.001)
[81][90]. The oncologic additive risk of association between PSC and IBD was confirmed in a Spanish multicenter retrospective cohort study. The risk of CRC was increased four- to fivefold in PSC-IBD patients compared to IBD controls, including patients submitted to annual colonoscopic surveillance
[82][91].
Data related to sex differences in PSC clinical presentation and evolution are scarce. From the Italian registry, including 502 PSC patients in population-based data, the survival rate was 92% at 10 years from diagnosis and 82% at 20 years, considering all causes of deaths. The Kaplan–Meier curves show no significant difference between male and female patients with respect to estimated survival times from diagnosis
[71][80]. The International PSC Study Group published a multicenter outcome study in 2017 to describe the natural history of the disease, including 7121 patients across 17 countries and encompassing ≥30 years of clinical observation from 1980 through 2010. The study registered sex-specific variations in clinical phenotype and correlations with liver disease progression and neoplastic complications. Men comprised the majority of the cohort (66%) and were younger than women (average age of 37 years vs. 40 years). Women more commonly exhibited small-duct PSC phenotype, ulcerative colitis (UC) was less common in women than men (48% vs. 61%, respectively
p < 0.001) and small-duct PSC was characterized by a low-risk phenotype in both sexes (adjusted HR for men, 0.23;
p < 0.001 and adjusted HR for women, 0.48;
p = 0.003). Female sex was an independent protective factor against liver progression; in particular, females maintained a significantly higher transplant-free survival than males matched for age and PSC phenotype. Moreover, the lower prevalence of UC in women may partially account for differences in liver disease progression between the sexes.
3. Overlap Syndromes and Gender
The term overlap syndrome (OS) describes a subtype of clinical syndromes that share common features relating to AIH and PBC or AIH and PSC. Very rarely, an overlap syndrome between PBC and PSC has been described. However, the term remains controversial, and it is not known whether overlaps are situations occurring simultaneously or represent a different development during the natural course of the disease.
PBC-AIH is the most common form of overlap syndromes
[83][84][92,93]. A systematic review included 17 studies of PBC-AIH comprising a total of 402 patients
[85][94]. Female gender was present in 87–100% of either retrospective or prospective studies.
AIH-PSC overlap syndrome has been described in both children and adults. In children, the syndrome is particularly important, reported in up to 40% of patients with AIH
[86][95]. Adults diagnosed with AIH-PSC overlap are significantly younger at the time of diagnosis than those with classical PSC (24–27 years vs. 39–46 years, respectively)
[87][88][89][96,97,98]. The proportion of adult males with AIH-PSC overlap is 69–81%, which is higher than in AIH
[90][99]. However, the proportion of male gender in AIH-PSC undergoing liver transplantation was slightly lower (49%) than the number reported in classical PSC
[91][100].
4. Conclusions
The mechanisms behind the sex differences observed in autoimmune liver diseases, specifically the female predominance in AIH and PBC; the worse disease course in male PBC; male predominance in PSC patients with a lower risk of UC; and cholangiocarcinoma among female patients remain largely unknown. Understanding the effects of sex-related genes and intestinal microbiota underlying AILD immune dysregulation, as well as the role of sex hormones in immune cells, may pave the way for novel treatment strategies for AILD.
In PBC patients, the frequent delay in diagnosis plays an important role among the male sex, leading to more advanced liver disease at PBC presentation; consequently, the risk of ACLD, liver decompensation, HCC development and mortality is higher in male than in female patients, with worse biochemical response rates. Delayed diagnosis could be partially explained by the lower incidence of PBC in male patients, leading clinicians to not consider the disease as a first choice, was well the minor presence of PBC-related symptoms. Despite its rarity, the diagnosis of PBC should be considered in men with elevated cholestatic parameters maintaining a high index of suspicion for PBC to prevent diagnostic delays.