Steatohepatitis, Mitochondria, and Inflammasome: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Conner Chen and Version 2 by Conner Chen.

Alcoholic (ASH) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are advanced stages of fatty liver disease and two of the most prevalent forms of chronic liver disease. ASH and NASH are associated with significant risk of further progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer, and a major cause of cancer-related mortality.  Mitochondrial damage and activation of inflammasome complexes have a role in inducing and sustaining liver damage.

  • mitochondria
  • alcoholism
  • steatohepatitis

1. Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (ASH)

1.1. Epidemiology and Etiology

The public health impact of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is growing and remains a major cause of liver-related mortality worldwide, with around three million estimated deaths per year. In Europe and the United States, ALD is one of the most prevalent forms of liver disease [1]. The amount of alcohol consumed is directly related with the risk of ALD [2]. The disease is caused by the chronic consumption of alcohol with a certain daily amount of about 40 to 80 g of ethanol per day for men and 20 to 40 g per day for women for a minimum of 10 to 12 years [3]. The proportion of global deaths attributable to alcohol consumption, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), is 7.6% in men and 4.0% in women. However, the natural course of ALD may be affected by other various factors, not only by drinking patterns, such as obesity, genetic variants, diet, and co-medication [4].

1.2. Progression and Stages

The spectrum of ALD includes from simple alcoholic steatosis to steatohepatitis (ASH), alcoholic hepatitis (AH), and cirrhosis [5]. Between 90 and 100% of the individuals that consume more than 40 g of alcohol daily end up developing alcoholic fatty liver. A percentage of about 10–35% of these individuals develop ASH, which reflects a severe inflammatory state of the liver characterized by specific histological features, such as presence of fat, ballooning of hepatocytes, infiltration of neutrophils, and/or liver fibrosis [4]. Once cirrhosis is established, in around 8–20% of the ASH patients, the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma increases ~2% per year [6]. The factors involved in the pathophysiology of ASH are hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, acetaldehyde-mediated toxicity, cytokine- and chemokine-induced inflammation, and the onset of pyroptosis [4].

1.3. Pathogenesis

Ethanol is metabolized in hepatocytes by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and the resulting generation of acetaldehyde is further metabolized to acetate by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) [7]. Besides ADH, ethanol is also metabolized by CYP2E1, which consumes molecular oxygen for the oxidation of ethanol into acetaldehyde and causes a subsequent generation of free radicals and ROS as byproducts, such as ethoxy radical, hydroxyethyl radical, acetyl radical, singlet radical, superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, alkoxyl radical, and peroxyl radical [8]. Alcohol-generated ROS initiates a cascade of deleterious events that produce oxidative stress and inflammation. Alcohol disrupts hepatic lipid metabolism, producing lipid peroxidation products, such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) or malondialdehyde (MDA), and modifies the intestinal microbiome, causing the release of endotoxins (LPS) and other PAMPs that may further contribute to alcoholic liver disease [4][9].
Sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP1c) and peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-α (PPARα) are two key lipogenic transcription factors implicated in the development of fatty liver following chronic alcohol consumption [10]. Various factors, for example, acetaldehyde, LPS, PAMPs, and ER stress, induce the upregulation of SREBP1c and other lipogenic genes and activate the fatty acid (FA) synthesis, leading to steatosis [11]. On the other hand, alcohol inhibits the β-oxidation of fatty acids due to the suppression of PPARα by different factors, such as the increment of acetaldehyde and the oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ratio (NADH/NAD+) or by the inhibition of adiponectin, 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and zinc levels [12][13]. In addition, alcohol ingestion produces an acetaldehyde-mediated depletion of mitochondrial GSH, leading to oxidative stress in hepatocytes, which impairs hepatocyte tolerance to TNF-α, resulting in increased cell death and organ damage [14].
ROS can also stimulate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), leading to extracellular matrix production, which results in fibrogenesis [15]. Beside hepatocytes and HSCs, other hepatic cells, such as Kupffer cells (KCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, are also affected and release pro-inflammatory cytokines which stimulate the progression of ALD to cirrhosis and HCC [16].

2. ASH, Mitochondria, and Inflammasome

Hepatic inflammation is a characteristic feature of ASH and is a prerequisite for the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapy, due to our incomplete understanding of the molecular events leading to ASH. In this regard, there is evidence in experimental animal models linking inflammasome activation and mitochondrial dysfunction as potential mechanisms involved in ASH.
The involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in ALD has been demonstrated in several studies [17]. Alcohol produces a loss of the intestinal barrier integrity that allows the translocation of microbial products (endotoxins and saturated long-chain FA) to the circulation which may enter into the liver, inducing the activation of the inflammasome cascade (NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β).
Chronic alcohol consumption produces an increment in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients and in alcoholic experimental models. Other increased cytokines in serum of ASH in experimental models include TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. The latter is generated from the processing of pro-IL1β, which is induced via TLR4–NF-κB activation, the common pathway of priming NLRP3 inflammasome. IL-1β has been shown to upregulate fatty acid synthesis, contributing to the onset of hepatic steatosis. In this regard, it has been shown that Anakinra, a pharmacological inhibitor of IL-1β signaling, ameliorated alcohol-related liver injury and promoted the regeneration of hepatocytes in mice with alcoholic hepatitis [18].
Numerous studies have shown that ALD also produces an increment of uric acid and ATP levels, which can activate NLRP3 in KCs, the resident liver macrophages, leading to the activation of caspase-1. KCs present a 20-fold higher expression of inflammasome components than hepatocytes [19]. Deletion of the corresponding purinergic signaling through P2X7 receptor blocked ATP signaling and the recruitment of the NLRP3 inflammasome-caspase-1 complex in KCs, consistent with their role in the pathophysiology of ALD [20][21]. Moreover, KCs can also regulate HSC activation by cytokines and chemokines, thus contributing to the onset of fibrosis, an indicator of disease progression [22].
Evidence supporting a crucial role of NLRP3 activation in ALD includes the marked protection of mice with global knockout of caspase-1, ASC, and IL-1β receptor which exhibit alleviated steatosis and inflammation [23]. In addition, similar protection against liver injury and inflammation has been reported in mice with the specific deletion of caspase-1 in KCs, as well as in NLRP3 knockout mice following an acute-on-chronic alcohol feeding, which produced the upregulation of NLRP3, ASC, and IL-1β.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-148a, are key contributors to liver disease progression. Recent evidence in experimental ALD models showed a decrease in miR148a expression in hepatocytes through FoxO1, a metabolic regulator and tumor suppressor in the liver, promoting the overexpression of the thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which in turn produced pyroptosis [24]. In this regard, using a hybrid feeding model in which western diet with intragastric ethanol administration synergized to develop ASH, Khanova et al. showed the upregulation of caspase-1 and GSDMD processing, suggesting a crucial role for pyroptosis in alcoholic hepatitis [25]. Altogether, these findings in mouse models and ALD patients point to a potential relevance of the activation of the inflammasome in the pathogenesis of ALD, emerging as a potential target for treatment which remains to be further investigated.
An additional link between alcohol metabolism and NLRP3 activation is likely mediated via mitochondrial dysfunction, as it is well known that the oxidative metabolism of alcohol targets mitochondria. Indeed, mitochondrial dysfunction is a hallmark and a cause of ALD, due in part to the onset of ROS generation and oxidative stress. Mitochondria not only contribute to the oxidative metabolism of alcohol, but they are also important targets of alcohol toxicity. For instance, during the initiation and progression of ALD, alcohol metabolism decreases mitochondria membrane potential (MMP), affects the electron mitochondrial respiratory chain, and increases ROS generation, which targets mtDNA, resulting in oxidized mtDNA fragments and deletions in both ALD patients and experimental models [26], and these deleterious effects of ethanol are initiated by its oxidative metabolism via ALDH and especially CYP2E1 [8][27][28][29][30]. Although CYP2E1 is mainly located in the endoplasmic reticulum, there is evidence for its presence in other subcellular compartments, such as mitochondria. CYP2E1 can favor lipid peroxidation of mitochondrial membranes and further alter the respiratory chain, leading to oxidative stress and cytotoxicity due to ROS production and subsequent NLRP3 activation [31][32][33]. To illustrate the relevance of CYP2E1-induced oxidative metabolism of alcohol in ALD progression, it has been shown that CYP2E1 deletion in mice protects against alcohol-induced steatosis and ameliorates liver injury, while knock-in mice expressing human CYP2E1 exhibited increased susceptibility towards ALD progression using the Lieber–DeCarli model, which translated to higher liver injury, oxidative stress, inflammation, and mild fibrosis compared to wild type mice [34]. To further support the role of CYP2E1 in NLRP3 activation in ALD, it has been shown that Ginsenoside Rg1 (G-Rg1), a hepatoprotective component of the medicinal plant (Panax ginseng) [35], which blocks the induction of CYP2E1, prevented the generation of ROS and mitochondrial damage, leading to an inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation [33]. Moreover, CYP2E1 emerged as a critical factor in mediating alcohol-induced liver hypoxia and HIF-1 stabilization, which is preferentially seen in the perivenous zone of the liver, as these effects were prevented in CYP2E1 knockout mice and potentiated in knock-in mice expressing human CYP2E1 [36]. Importantly, hypoxia and HIF-1 have been shown to mediate mitochondrial dysfunction [37][38], and, hence, it is conceivable that alcohol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction may be caused in part by HIF-1 stabilization via CYP2E1.
Moreover, mitophagy plays a critical role in ALD. Mitophagy consists in the removal of damaged mitochondria, which in turn can reduce ROS accumulation and the damaged mtDNA, thus emerging as a protective mechanism for ALD [30]. Among the proteins that regulate mitophagy, a recent study showed that AMPK can significantly reduce alcohol-induced liver injury via the upregulation of mitophagy [39]. Moreover, it is known that patients with ALD have structural abnormalities in hepatic mitochondria and that mitochondrial dynamics determine the progression of ALD. For instance, the presence of megamitochondria is usually associated with a milder form of the disease [40], while increased mitochondrial fragmentation has been shown to promote severe ALD, including alcoholic hepatitis [41][42], suggesting that the targeting of mitochondrial dynamics via Drp-1 may stand as a potential promising approach for ALD.
In addition to the mitochondrial abnormalities at the morphological level caused by alcohol, there are also other mitochondrial functional alterations that contribute to ALD, such as the stimulated synthesis and trafficking of cholesterol to mitochondria [43][44][45]. Extensive evidence supports a critical role of mitochondrial cholesterol-mediated regulation of mGSH. Thus, alcohol induces mGSH depletion, which determines hepatocellular susceptibility to TNFα, inflammation, and oxidative stress [14][46]. Interestingly, alcohol-induced mGSH depletion observed in wild type mice is markedly accentuated in knock-in mice overexpressing CYP2E1 [36]. In this regard, there has been evidence indicating that ER stress is an important mechanism leading to mitochondrial cholesterol accumulation and mGSH depletion [47][48]. Cholesterol trafficking to mitochondrial membranes is causally mediated by the mitochondrial cholesterol transporter StARD1, which is causally linked to the mitochondrial alterations of membrane physical properties, underlying in part the mitochondrial dysfunction characteristic of ALD [46][47][48][49][50]. Besides the effect of cholesterol increased by alcohol feeding, ethanol exposure can induce mitochondrial ROS generation by other mechanisms, including inhibition of mitochondrial β-oxidation by blunting the induction of β-oxidation genes (PPARα), reduction of carnitine β-oxidation cofactor, or induction of the voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (VDAC) closure in mitochondrial membrane [51][52][53], which overall contribute to the increase of ROS generation in ALD. Therefore, a crosstalk between mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammasome activation induced by chronic ethanol consumption may contribute to the progression of ALD.

3. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

3.1. Epidemiology

According to the WHO, obesity is considered as the epidemic of the 21st century, since it affects more than 600 million people globally. Obesity is associated with liver disease and cardiovascular disorders, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and degenerative disorders, including dementia [54]. One of the consequences of obesity is the so-called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is a leading cause of chronic liver disease due to its association with obesity and type II diabetes. In Western countries, it affects around 30% of the population, and it is expected to increase due to the obesity and metabolic syndrome epidemic. Epidemiological data show that NAFLD is highly prevalent in all continents, with the highest rates in South America (31%) and the Middle East (32%), followed by Asia (27%), United States (24%), and Europe (23%), being less common in Africa (13%). NAFLD is expected to become the main cause of liver transplantation, and its prevalence can reach 90–95% in obese individuals [55][56][57].

3.2. Etiology

NAFLD is defined as the presence of more than 5% of fat in the liver (hepatic steatosis) despite the absence of significant alcohol consumption (less than 20 g/day) [58]. In the pathogenesis of NAFLD, insulin resistance (IR) is one of the primary mechanisms, as it affects both lipid metabolism and inflammatory processes. For instance, IR inhibits lipolysis in adipose tissue and stimulates de novo lipogenesis in the liver [59]. Apart from IR, the main risk factors for developing NAFLD are diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. However, NAFLD is associated with other extrahepatic manifestations, such as hypertension, gut microbiota alterations, endocrine diseases, genetic predisposition (polymorphisms in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 genes), sedentary lifestyle, and consumption of certain foods (e.g., fructose) [55][56][60]. For several years, the description of the NAFLD pathogenesis followed the “two hits” theory. This theory posits the existence of a first “hit” reflected by the intrahepatic accumulation of fatty acids due to IR, which sensitizes to “secondary hits” such as oxidative stress or mitochondrial dysfunction underlying liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. This initial view was reformulated by a novel theory to underlie NAFLD, the “multiple-parallel hits” [61], which considers a scenario where many factors act in parallel and in a synergic manner. The interaction between genetic, hormonal, and nutritional factors can lead to obesity and IR development, promoting accumulation of fat in the liver and adipose tissue dysfunction, which in turn induce secretion of adipokines and inflammatory cytokines [62]. Lastly, NAFLD development also involves mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, oxidative stress, and production of ROS. All of these factors give rise to a chronic hepatic inflammatory state promoting the development and progression of NAFLD [55][60][63].

3.3. Progression and Stages

NAFLD comprises a wide spectrum of liver alterations, beginning from simple hepatic steatosis without evidence of hepatocellular injury (e.g., ballooning), called nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), to an advanced stage with inflammation and hepatocyte damage and typically accompanied with pericellular fibrosis, called nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Finally, the progression of NASH culminates in cirrhosis, liver failure, and final stage of HCC [60][64].
Recent studies determine that 5–20% of patients with NAFL develop NASH in their clinical course, of which 10–20% develop higher-grade fibrosis and <5% progress to cirrhosis. Between 18 and 33% of the cases with NAFLD have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and up to 66–83% of NAFLD cases have IR [56].
Despite recent progress regarding the pathogenesis of NAFLD, the denomination overestimates alcohol and underestimates the predisposing metabolic risk factors [65]. For these reasons, it has been proposed that the name of the disease should be changed from NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a new term that takes into account evidence of hepatic steatosis as well as overweight/obesity, presence of T2DM, or metabolic dysregulation [66].

4. NASH, Mitochondria, and Inflammasome

Although both ASH and NASH exhibit differential pathological characteristics, mitochondrial alterations stand as a common nexus (Table 1). In NAFL and especially in NASH, hepatic mitochondria are altered at the structural and molecular levels. Thus, a decline in mitochondrial function may disrupt metabolism and, hence, can contribute to the progression from NAFL to NASH [67]. However, the mechanisms and pathways that lead to the progression of NAFLD due to mitochondrial dysfunction are still unclear [68]. It is well known that the accumulation of hepatic free FA and triglycerides disrupts mitochondrial function and homeostasis, which are fundamental for the maintenance of normal energy, oxidant, and metabolic status [69]. This accumulation of free FA induces a metabolic shift by stimulating oxidative phosphorylation, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and FA β-oxidation. Mitochondrial dysfunction in NASH also comprises alterations in electron transport chain and membrane potential, inducing the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition and reduction in ATP synthesis [68]. Moreover, intracellular free FA accumulation enhances lipotoxicity through generation of ROS by respiratory chain complex enzymes during energy formation. ROS inhibit respiratory chain complex enzymes, and, as a result, ATP synthesis drops off [69][70]. This decrease in ATP levels may aggravate ER stress through the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which in turn activates de novo lipogenesis pathways and further aggravates steatosis [71]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to HCC progression through increased ROS production, impaired mitochondrial respiration, ER stress, and alteration of nutrient metabolism [72].
Table 1. Comparison of pathological characteristics and mitochondrial mechanisms in ASH and NASH.
  ASH NASH
Pathological characteristics >5% Steatosis

Hepatocyte ballooning

Liver fibrosis (HSC activation, extracellular matrix production)

Mallory–Denk bodies formation

Lobular inflammation (neutrophils and macrophages infiltration)
>20 g alcohol/day

Ethanol is metabolized by ADH and ALDH

Activation CYP2E1 and ROS production

Disruption of hepatic lipid metabolism (4-HNE, MDA)

Induction of lipogenic factors (SREBP1c, PPARα)

Gut dysbiosis (ethanol)		 <20 g alcohol/day

Obesity

Insulin resistance

Associated T2DM

Hepatic FFA and TG

Oxidative phosphorylation, TCA and FA β-oxidation

Induction of lipogenic factors (SREBP2)

Gut dysbiosis (LPS, cholesterol crystals)
Mitochondrial mechanisms Mitochondrial cholesterol accumulation (STARD1)

Calcium overload (VDAC)

Reduction in ATP production

Cardiolipin translocation

Decreased mGSH

Ox-mtDNA

Loss of MMP

Impaired mitophagy

Inflammasome complex activation (MAMs)
ROS derived from acetaldehyde metabolization ROS derived from FA β-oxidation
Mitochondria-derived ROS and lipid peroxidation promote the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β), which may be an important link between the initial metabolic shift and consecutive hepatocyte death and progression of hepatic fibrosis in NASH [73]. DAMPs, such as saturated FA, as well as PAMPs activate NLRP3 inflammasome-like products of gut microbiota delivered to the liver [60]. Extensive evidence suggests that saturated FAs represent an endogenous danger in the first hit of NASH by upregulating the inflammasome and thus sensitizing to second hits such as LPS for IL-1β release [74]. In recent years, emerging data have demonstrated the role of activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of NASH, where NLRP3 plays an important role in the detection of inflammatory signals and conversion of these into an inflammatory response in the gut–liver axis. Moreover, it has been shown that the NLRP3 inflammasome plays an important role in steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in experimental models of liver disease and that blocking its activation could be a potential therapy to slow down the progression of the disease [75]. In this regard, it has been shown that in the GSDMD-knockout mice steatohepatitis is ameliorated compared to WT mice, which exhibit enhanced hepatic NLRP3 inflammasome expression, reinforcing NASH progression [25][76]. Researchers have demonstrated that reduction of NLRP3 expression in adipose tissue prevented the obesity-induced inflammasome activation in liver and improved insulin sensitivity in obese type-2 diabetic patients [77]. Additional evidence indicated that NLRP1/3 inflammasome levels increased in a mouse model of NASH caused by HFCD (high fat calorie diet) plus high fructose and glucose in the drinking water. By reducing NLRP3 inflammasome activity, HFCD plus high fructose-fed mice exhibited significantly improved obesity-associated metabolic abnormalities [69]. Further support for the role of NLRP3 in NASH was provided by blocking NRLP3 inflammasome with a specific antagonist, IFM-514, in mice fed a methionine/choline-deficient diet (MCD), resulting in reduced caspase-1 activation, decreased hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [78]. Moreover, Mridha et al. used a NLRP3 inhibitor, MCC950, in order to reduce liver injury in NASH in a murine model of steatohepatitis caused by feeding mice with MCD/WD (Western diet), leading to a decrease in transaminase levels, liver fibrosis, and cytokine levels compared to the mice treated with the vehicle [79].
Increase in liver cholesterol either through the diet or enhanced endogenous synthesis controlled by SREBP2 has emerged as an important player in NASH and the progression towards HCC [80][81]. Cholesterol, and particularly its trafficking to mitochondria, can cause oxidative stress, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and reduction in ATP content and steatosis. It is also suggested that overload of free cholesterol disrupts mitochondrial and ER membrane integrity. Thus, cumulative evidence suggests that cholesterol overload in mitochondria induces redox imbalances, leading to oxidative stress and cell death associated with steatohepatitis [82]. Moreover, additional evidence demonstrated that inflammasome-mediated cholesterol crystallization in KCs is an important factor during the progression of hepatic inflammation in NASH [83][84]. Benzyl isothiocyanate, a natural compound with chemopreventive properties, protected against NASH development, with the amelioration of LPS- and cholesterol crystal-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in KCs [85]. In vitro data using HepG2 cells indicated the ability of palmitate to induce hepatic steatosis and inflammasome activation [86]. In foz/foz mice fed with a high-fat diet, the treatment with ezetimibe and atorvastatin reduced hepatic cholesterol content and hepatic cholesterol crystals, ameliorating inflammation and fibrosis and leading to an improved NASH regression [87]. To sum up, cholesterol-lowering drugs can be of potential relevance to modify NAFLD pathology and disease progression, suggesting that this approach may be a potential approach for inflammasome deactivation. Whether selectively targeting the mitochondrial cholesterol pool ameliorates the NLRP3 activation in NASH remains to be further investigated.

References

  1. Rehm, J.; Samokhvalov, A.V.; Shield, K.D. Global Burden of Alcoholic Liver Diseases. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 160–168.
  2. Han, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Ma, J.; Chandler, K.; Liangpunsakul, S. Epidemiology of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Clin. Liver Dis. 2021, 25, 483–492.
  3. Becker, U.; Deis, A.; Sorensen, T.I.; Gronbaek, M.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Muller, C.F.; Schnohr, P.; Jensen, G. Prediction of Risk of Liver Disease by Alcohol Intake, Sex, and Age: A Prospective Population Study. Hepatology 1996, 23, 1025–1029.
  4. Seitz, H.K.; Bataller, R.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Gao, B.; Gual, A.; Lackner, C.; Mathurin, P.; Mueller, S.; Szabo, G.; Tsukamoto, H. Alcoholic Liver Disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 16.
  5. Farooq, M.O.; Bataller, R. Pathogenesis and management of alcoholic liver disease. Dig. Dis. 2016, 34, 347.
  6. Llovet, J.M.; Kelley, R.K.; Villanueva, A.; Singal, A.G.; Pikarsky, E.; Roayaie, S.; Lencioni, R.; Koike, K.; Zucman-Rossi, J.; Finn, R.S. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 7, 6.
  7. Cederbaum, A.I. Alcohol metabolism. Clin. Liver Dis. 2012, 16, 667.
  8. Teschke, R. Alcoholic Liver Disease: Alcohol Metabolism, Cascade of Molecular Mechanisms, Cellular Targets, and Clinical Aspects. Biomedicines 2018, 6, 106.
  9. Pohl, K.; Moodley, P.; Dhanda, A.D. Alcohol’s Impact on the Gut and Liver. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3170.
  10. Purohit, V.; Gao, B.; Song, B.J. Molecular Mechanisms of Alcoholic Fatty Liver. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 191.
  11. You, M.; Fischer, M.; Deeg, M.A.; Crabb, D.W. Ethanol Induces Fatty Acid Synthesis Pathways by Activation of Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein (SREBP). J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 29342–29347.
  12. You, M.; Arteel, G.E. Effect of Ethanol on Lipid Metabolism. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 237–248.
  13. Liu, J. Ethanol and Liver: Recent Insights into the Mechanisms of Ethanol-Induced Fatty Liver. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2014, 20, 14672.
  14. Fernandez-Checa, J.C.; Kaplowitz, N. Hepatic Mitochondrial Glutathione: Transport and Role in Disease and Toxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2005, 204, 263–273.
  15. Ramos-Tovar, E.; Muriel, P. Molecular Mechanisms That Link Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Fibrosis in the Liver. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1279.
  16. Slevin, E.; Baiocchi, L.; Wu, N.; Ekser, B.; Sato, K.; Lin, E.; Ceci, L.; Chen, L.; Lorenzo, S.R.; Xu, W.; et al. Kupffer Cells: Inflammation Pathways and Cell-Cell Interactions in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2020, 190, 2185–2193.
  17. Knorr, J.; Wree, A.; Tacke, F.; Feldstein, A.E. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Semin. Liver Dis. 2020, 40, 298–306.
  18. Iracheta-Vellve, A.; Petrasek, J.; Gyogyosi, B.; Bala, S.; Csak, T.; Kodys, K.; Szabo, G. Interleukin-1 Inhibition Facilitates Recovery from Liver Injury and Promotes Regeneration of Hepatocytes in Alcoholic Hepatitis in Mice. Liver Int. 2017, 37, 968.
  19. Boaru, S.G.; Borkham-Kamphorst, E.; Tihaa, L.; Haas, U.; Weiskirchen, R. Expression Analysis of Inflammasomes in Experimental Models of Inflammatory and Fibrotic Liver Disease. J. Inflamm. 2012, 9, 49.
  20. Le Daré, B.; Ferron, P.J.; Gicquel, T. The Purinergic P2 × 7 Receptor-NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway: A New Target in Alcoholic Liver Disease? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2139.
  21. Ren, W.; Rubini, P.; Tang, Y.; Engel, T.; Illes, P. Inherent P2 × 7 Receptors Regulate Macrophage Functions during Inflammatory Diseases. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 232.
  22. Khanam, A.; Saleeb, P.G.; Kottilil, S. Pathophysiology and Treatment Options for Hepatic Fibrosis: Can It Be Completely Cured? Cells 2021, 10, 1097.
  23. Petrasek, J.; Bala, S.; Csak, T.; Lippai, D.; Kodys, K.; Menashy, V.; Barrieau, M.; Min, S.Y.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Szabo, G. IL-1 Receptor Antagonist Ameliorates Inflammasome-Dependent Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3476–3489.
  24. Heo, M.J.; Kim, T.H.; You, J.S.; Blaya, D.; Sancho-Bru, P.; Kim, S.G. Alcohol Dysregulates MiR-148a in Hepatocytes through FoxO1, Facilitating Pyroptosis via TXNIP Overexpression. Gut 2019, 68, 708–720.
  25. Khanova, E.; Wu, R.; Wang, W.; Yan, R.; Chen, Y.; French, S.W.; Llorente, C.; Pan, S.Q.; Yang, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Pyroptosis by Caspase11/4-Gasdermin-D Pathway in Alcoholic Hepatitis in Mice and Patients. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1737–1753.
  26. Fromenty, B.; Grimbert, S.; Mansouri, A.; Beaugrand, M.; Erlinger, S.; Rötig, A.; Pessayre, D. Hepatic Mitochondrial DNA Deletion in Alcoholics: Association with Microvesicular Steatosis. Gastroenterology 1995, 108, 193–200.
  27. Bansal, S.; Anandatheerthavarada, H.K.; Prabu, G.K.; Milne, G.L.; Martin, M.V.; Guengerich, F.P.; Avadhani, N.G. Human Cytochrome P450 2E1 Mutations That Alter Mitochondrial Targeting Efficiency and Susceptibility to Ethanol-Induced Toxicity in Cellular Models. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 12627–12644.
  28. Robin, M.A.; Anandatheerthavarada, H.K.; Fang, J.K.; Cudic, M.; Otros, L.; Avadhani, N.G. Mitochondrial Targeted Cytochrome P450 2E1 (P450 MT5) Contains an Intact N Terminus and Requires Mitochondrial Specific Electron Transfer Proteins for Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 24680–24689.
  29. Wu, D.; Cederbaum, A.I. Ethanol Cytotoxicity to a Transfected HepG2 Cell Line Expressing Human Cytochrome P4502E1. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 23914–23919.
  30. Angireddy, R.; Chowdhury, A.R.; Zielonka, J.; Ruthel, G.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Avadhani, N.G. Alcohol-Induced CYP2E1, Mitochondrial Dynamics and Retrograde Signaling in Human Hepatic 3D Organoids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 159, 1–14.
  31. Knockaert, L.; Fromenty, B.; Robin, M.A. Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Targeting of Cytochrome P450 2E1: Physiopathological Role in Liver Injury and Obesity. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 4252–4260.
  32. Abdelmegeed, M.A.; Ha, S.-K.; Choi, Y.; Akbar, M.; Song, B.-J. Role of CYP2E1 in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Hepatic Tissue Injury in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Diseases. Curr. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 10, 207.
  33. Yang, C.; He, X.; Zhao, J.; Huang, W. Hepatoprotection by Ginsenoside Rg1 in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 92, 107327.
  34. Lu, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, X.; Ward, S.C.; Cederbaum, A.I. Chronic Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury and Oxidant Stress Are Decreased in Cytochrome P4502E1 Knockout Mice and Restored in Humanized Cytochrome P4502E1 Knock-in Mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1406–1416.
  35. Zhao, J.; He, B.; Zhang, S.; Huang, W.; Li, X. Ginsenoside Rg1 Alleviates Acute Liver Injury through the Induction of Autophagy and Suppressing NF-ΚB/NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1382.
  36. Wang, X.; Wu, D.; Yang, L.; Gan, L.; Cederbaum, A.I. Cyto Chrome P450 2E1 Potentiates Ethanol Induction of Hypoxia and HIF-1α In Vivo. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 63, 175–186.
  37. Mansfield, K.D.; Guzy, R.D.; Pan, Y.; Young, R.M.; Cash, T.P.; Schumacker, P.T.; Simon, M.C. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Resulting from Loss of Cytochrome c Impairs Cellular Oxygen Sensing and Hypoxic HIF-α Activation. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 393–399.
  38. Guzy, R.D.; Hoyos, B.; Robin, E.; Chen, H.; Liu, L.; Mansfield, K.D.; Simon, M.C.; Hammerling, U.; Schumacker, P.T. Mitochondrial Complex III Is Required for Hypoxia-Induced ROS Production and Cellular Oxygen Sensing. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 401–408.
  39. Lu, X.; Xuan, W.; Li, J.; Yao, H.; Huang, C.; Li, J. AMPK Protects against Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury through UQCRC2 to up-Regulate Mitophagy. Autophagy 2021, 17, 3622.
  40. Inagaki, T.; Koike, M.; Ikuta, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Kato, K.; Kato, K. Ultrastructural Identification and Clinical Significance of Light Microscopic Giant Mitochondria in Alcoholic Liver Injuries. Gastroenterol. Jpn. 1989, 24, 46–53.
  41. Palma, E.; Riva, A.; Moreno, C.; Odena, G.; Mudan, S.; Manyakin, N.; Miquel, R.; Degré, D.; Trepo, E.; Sancho-Bru, P.; et al. Perturbations in Mitochondrial Dynamics Are Closely Involved in the Progression of Alcoholic Liver Disease. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2020, 44, 856–865.
  42. Palma, E.; Ma, X.; Riva, A.; Iansante, V.; Dhawan, A.; Wang, S.; Ni, H.M.; Sesaki, H.; Williams, R.; Ding, W.X.; et al. Dynamin-1-Like Protein Inhibition Drives Megamitochondria Formation as an Adaptive Response in Alcohol-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 580–589.
  43. Colell, A.; García-Ruiz, C.; Miranda, M.; Ardite, E.; Marí, M.; Morales, A.; Corrales, F.; Kaplowitz, N.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Selective Glutathione Depletion of Mitochondria by Ethanol Sensitizes Hepatocytes to Tumor Necrosis Factor. Gastroenterology 1998, 115, 1541–1551.
  44. Li, Q.; Zhong, W.; Qiu, Y.; Kang, X.; Sun, X.; Tan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, X.; Jia, W.; Zhou, Z. Preservation of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4α Contributes to the Beneficial Effect of Dietary Medium Chain Triglyceride on Alcohol-Induced Hepatic Lipid Dyshomeostasis in Rats. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37, 587–598.
  45. García-Ruiz, C.; Kaplowitz, N.; Fernandez-Checa, J.C. Role of Mitochondria in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 2013, 1, 159–168.
  46. Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Fucho, R.; Torres, S.; Nuñez, S.; Nuño-Lámbarri, N.; Enrich, C.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Cholesterol Enrichment in Liver Mitochondria Impairs Oxidative Phosphorylation and Disrupts the Assembly of Respiratory Supercomplexes. Redox Biol. 2019, 24, 101214.
  47. Torres, S.; Baulies, A.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Alarcón-Vila, C.; Fucho, R.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Núñez, S.; Robles, D.; Ribas, V.; Wakefield, L.; et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Induced Upregulation of STARD1 Promotes Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Failure. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 552–568.
  48. Fernandez, A.; Matias, N.; Fucho, R.; Ribas, V.; Von Montfort, C.; Nuño, N.; Baulies, A.; Martinez, L.; Tarrats, N.; Mari, M.; et al. ASMase Is Required for Chronic Alcohol Induced Hepatic Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Cholesterol Loading. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 805–813.
  49. Torres, S.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Nuñez, S.; Matías, N.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Castro, F.; Casasempere, M.; Fabriás, G.; Casas, J.; Enrich, C.; et al. Acid Ceramidase Improves Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Stress in Niemann-Pick Type C Disease by Repressing STARD1 Expression and Mitochondrial Cholesterol Accumulation. Redox Biol. 2021, 45, 102052.
  50. Conde de la Rosa, L.; Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Vallejo, C.; Baulies, A.; Nuñez, S.; Monte, M.J.; Marin, J.J.G.; Baila-Rueda, L.; Cenarro, A.; Civeira, F.; et al. STARD1 Promotes NASH-Driven HCC by Sustaining the Generation of Bile Acids through the Alternative Mitochondrial Pathway. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1429–1441.
  51. Robertson, D.J.; Yang, V.W.; Mansouri, A.; Gattolliat, C.-H.; Asselah, T. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 629–647.
  52. Gao, B.; Argemi, J.; Bataller, R.; Schnabl, B. Serum Acylcarnitines Associated with High Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Alcoholic Hepatitis. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 281.
  53. Lemasters, J.J.; Holmuhamedov, E.L.; Czerny, C.; Zhong, Z.; Maldonado, E.N. Regulation of Mitochondrial Function by Voltage Dependent Anion Channels in Ethanol Metabolism and the Warburg Effect. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 1536–1544.
  54. Byrne, C.D.; Targher, G. NAFLD: A Multisystem Disease. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, S47–S64.
  55. Gariani, K.; Jornayvaz, F.R. Pathophysiology of NASH in Endocrine Diseases. Endocr. Connect. 2021, 10, R52–R65.
  56. Pappachan, J.M.; Babu, S.; Krishnan, B.; Ravindran, N.C. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Clinical Update. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2017, 5, 384–393.
  57. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease—Meta-Analytic Assessment of Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84.
  58. Puri, P.; Sanyal, A.J. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Definitions, Risk Factors, and Workup. Clin. Liver Dis. 2012, 1, 99–103.
  59. Colak, Y.; Tuncer, I.; Senates, E.; Ozturk, O.; Doganay, L.; Yilmaz, Y. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Nutritional Approach. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2012, 10, 161–166.
  60. Friedman, S.L.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Rinella, M.; Sanyal, A.J. Mechanisms of NAFLD Development and Therapeutic Strategies. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 908–922.
  61. Parthasarathy, G.; Revelo, X.; Malhi, H. Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: An Overview. Hepatol. Commun. 2020, 4, 478–492.
  62. Guilherme, A.; Virbasius, J.V.; Puri, V.; Czech, M.P. Adipocyte Dysfunctions Linking Obesity to Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 367–377.
  63. Buzzetti, E.; Pinzani, M.; Tsochatzis, E.A. The Multiple-Hit Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Metabolism 2016, 65, 1038–1048.
  64. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; Lavine, J.E.; Charlton, M.; Cusi, K.; Rinella, M.; Harrison, S.A.; Brunt, E.M.; Sanyal, A.J. The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018, 67, 328–357.
  65. Younossi, Z.M.; Rinella, M.E.; Sanyal, A.J.; Harrison, S.A.; Brunt, E.M.; Goodman, Z.; Cohen, D.E.; Loomba, R. From NAFLD to MAFLD: Implications of a Premature Change in Terminology. Hepatology 2021, 73, 1194–1198.
  66. Xian, Y.X.; Weng, J.P.; Xu, F. MAFLD vs. NAFLD: Shared Features and Potential Changes in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Pharmacotherapy. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 134, 8–19.
  67. Sunny, N.E.; Bril, F.; Cusi, K. Mitochondrial Adaptation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Novel Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 250–260.
  68. Simões, I.C.M.; Fontes, A.; Pinton, P.; Zischka, H.; Wieckowski, M.R. Mitochondria in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 95, 93–99.
  69. Zhang, N.P.; Liu, X.J.; Xie, L.; Shen, X.Z.; Wu, J. Impaired Mitophagy Triggers NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation during the Progression from Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 749–763.
  70. Farruggio, S.; Cocomazzi, G.; Marotta, P.; Romito, R.; Surico, D.; Calamita, G.; Bellan, M.; Pirisi, M.; Grossini, E. Genistein and 17β-Estradiol Protect Hepatocytes from Fatty Degeneration by Mechanisms Involving Mitochondria, Inflammasome and Kinases Activation. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 54, 401–416.
  71. Lee, J.; Homma, T.; Fujii, J. Mice in the Early Stage of Liver Steatosis Caused by a High Fat Diet Are Resistant to Thioacetamide-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Stress. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 277, 92–103.
  72. Ribas, V.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondria, Cholesterol and Cancer Cell Metabolism. Clin. Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 22.
  73. Léveillé, M.; Estall, J.L. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Transition from NASH to HCC. Metabolites 2019, 9, 233.
  74. Csak, T.; Ganz, M.; Pespisa, J.; Kodys, K.; Dolganiuc, A.; Szabo, G. Fatty Acid and Endotoxin Activate Inflammasomes in Mouse Hepatocytes That Release Danger Signals to Stimulate Immune Cells. Hepatology 2011, 54, 133–144.
  75. Colak, Y.; Hasan, B.; Erkalma, B.; Tandon, K.; Zervos, X.; Menzo, E.L.; Erim, T. Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Inhibition of the Inflammasome as a New Therapeutic Target. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2021, 45, 101710.
  76. Al Mamun, A.; Akter, A.; Hossain, S.; Sarker, T.; Safa, S.A.; Mustafa, Q.G.; Muhammad, S.A.; Munir, F. Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Liver Disease. J. Dig. Dis. 2020, 21, 430–436.
  77. Vandanmagsar, B.; Youm, Y.H.; Ravussin, A.; Galgani, J.E.; Stadler, K.; Mynatt, R.L.; Ravussin, E.; Stephens, J.M.; Dixit, V.D. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Instigates Obesity-Induced Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 179–189.
  78. Torres, S.; Brol, M.J.; Magdaleno, F.; Schierwagen, R.; Uschner, F.E.; Klein, S.; Ortiz, C.; Tyc, O.; Bachtler, N.; Stunden, J.; et al. The Specific NLRP3 Antagonist IFM-514 Decreases Fibrosis and Inflammation in Experimental Murine Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 715765.
  79. Mridha, A.R.; Wree, A.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Yeh, M.M.; Johnson, C.D.; Van Rooyen, D.M.; Haczeyni, F.; Teoh, N.C.H.; Savard, C.; Ioannou, G.N.; et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Blockade Reduces Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis in Experimental NASH in Mice. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 1037–1046.
  80. Ribas, V.; de La Rosa, L.C.; Robles, D.; Núñez, S.; Segalés, P.; Insausti-Urkia, N.; Solsona-Vilarrasa, E.; Fernández-Checa, J.C.; García-Ruiz, C. Dietary and Genetic Cholesterol Loading Rather Than Steatosis Promotes Liver Tumorigenesis and NASH-Driven HCC. Cancers 2021, 13, 4091.
  81. Caballero, F.; Fernández, A.; de Lacy, A.M.; Fernández-Checa, J.C.; Caballería, J.; García-Ruiz, C. Enhanced Free Cholesterol, SREBP-2 and StAR Expression in Human NASH. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, 789–796.
  82. Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Mari, M.; Colell, A.; Morales, A.; Caballero, F.; Montero, J.; Terrones, O.; Basañez, G.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondrial Cholesterol in Health and Disease. Histol. Histopathol. 2009, 24, 117–132.
  83. Hendrikx, T.; Bieghs, V.; Walenbergh, S.M.A.; Van Gorp, P.J.; Verheyen, F.; Jeurissen, M.L.J.; Steinbusch, M.M.F.; Vaes, N.; Binder, C.J.; Koek, G.H.; et al. Macrophage Specific Caspase-1/11 Deficiency Protects against Cholesterol Crystallization and Hepatic Inflammation in Hyperlipidemic Mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78792.
  84. Ioannou, G.N.; Haigh, W.G.; Thorning, D.; Savard, C. Hepatic Cholesterol Crystals and Crown-like Structures Distinguish NASH from Simple Steatosis. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 1326–1334.
  85. Chen, H.W.; Yen, C.C.; Kuo, L.L.; Lo, C.W.; Huang, C.S.; Chen, C.C.; Lii, C.K. Benzyl Isothiocyanate Ameliorates High-Fat/Cholesterol/Cholic Acid Diet-Induced Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis through Inhibiting Cholesterol Crystal-Activated NLRP3 Inflammasome in Kupffer Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020, 393, 114941.
  86. Bashiri, A.; Nesan, D.; Tavallaee, G.; Sue-Chue-Lam, I.; Chien, K.; Maguire, G.F.; Naples, M.; Zhang, J.; Magomedova, L.; Adeli, K.; et al. Cellular Cholesterol Accumulation Modulates High Fat High Sucrose (HFHS) Diet-Induced ER Stress and Hepatic Inflammasome Activation in the Development of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1861, 594–605.
  87. Ioannou, G.N.; Van Rooyen, D.M.; Savard, C.; Haigh, W.G.; Yeh, M.M.; Teoh, N.C.; Farrell, G.C. Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs Cause Dissolution of Cholesterol Crystals and Disperse Kupffer Cell Crown-like Structures during Resolution of NASH. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 277.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback