Molecular Structure and Biochemistry of Post-Proline Cleaving Enzymes: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 4 by Camila Xu and Version 3 by Camila Xu.

Post-proline cleaving enzymes (PPCEs) are involved in various biological functions in diverse taxa of organisms including microbes, fungi, animals, and plants.

  • prolyl endoprotease
  • prolyl oligopeptidase
  • protease
  • protein engineering

1. Introduction

Peptidases, proteases, proteinases, or proteolytic enzymes break down peptide molecules, mostly by attacking peptide bonds via hydrolysis. Extensive protease studies found seven main catalytic types, which can be categorized by the nucleophiles for the proteolytic reaction with water molecules. The nucleophiles mainly comprise different amino acid residues, including aspartate, cysteine, glutamate, serine, and threonine, whilst another type contains metal ions (mostly zinc) at their active site, denoted as metalloproteases [1]. The seventh catalytic type performs intramolecular self-cleavage without water molecules using asparagine as a nucleophile [2]. Besides catalytic type, proteases can be further classified according to the peptide cleavage sites between the amino (N-) and carboxyl (C-) termini of proteins, such as aminopeptidase, carboxypeptidase, endopeptidase, or exopeptidase [3]. An oligopeptidase only cleaves peptides but not proteins. As of March 2022, there were 281 protein families in the MEROPS peptidase database, comprising 4431 peptidases with identifiers, which were classified into nine catalytic types aspartic (A, 324), cysteine (C, 1059), glutamic (G, 22), metallo (M, 1098), asparagine (N, 24), mixed (P, 54), serine (S, 1728), threonine (T, 105), and unknown/unclassifiable (U, 17).
Many PPCEs can be found in the MEROPS peptidase database from 17 families with different substrates and proline-cleavage specificities (Table 1).
Table 1.
A non-exhaustive list of selected enzymes with post-proline cleaving activity based on records from the MEROPS peptidase database release 12.4.
Family Subfamily Peptidase UniProt/MEROPS ID Specificity † Substrate Cleavage Site Reference
[33].
Table 2. The post-proline cleaving enzymes that are reported in the different species discussed in this research.
Taxa Species (Common Name) UniProt/PDB ID MEROPS Enzyme Reference
G3

[1/1]		 G03.001 Strawberry mottle virus glutamic peptidase MER1365461 2/2 (100%) Polyprotein Peptide-Pro↓Ala/Lys-Peptide [4]
Virus Strawberry Mottle Virus -/- G03.001 Glutamic peptidase [4]
M2

[4/7]		 M02.003 Peptidyl-dipeptidase angiotensin-converting enzyme (ANCE) Q10714/MER0001987 6/7 (86%) Bradykinin Peptide-Pro↓Phe/Tyr-Arg [5]
Archaea Pyrococcus furiosus Q51714/5T88 S09.002 POP [46]   M02.006 Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 Q9BYF1/MER0011061 10/14 (71%) Angiotensin-2 Peptide-Pro↓Phe [6]
Bacteria Aeromonus punctata Q9X6R4/3IUM S09.001 PEP [47] M3

[8/11]		 M03.002 Neurolysin P42676/MER0001942 68/128 (53%) Neurotensin Peptide-Pro↓Tyr-Peptide
  Flavobacterium meningosepticum P27195/- S09.UPA[ POP [48]7]
M9D

[1/2]		 M9D.002 Proline-specific peptidyl-dipeptidase (
 Streptomyces) Lactobacillus helveticus- 2/2 (100%) Leu-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro Leu-Pro-Pro-Pro↓Pro-Pro O52071/-[ M13.0108]
PepO-3 [12] M12 *

[41/109]		 M12.164 Lebetase Q98995/MER0002591 6/14 (43%) Bradykinin Peptide-Pro↓Phe-Arg
  Meiothermus ruber H328 A0A7C3HT26/- S09.UPA[ PEP/POP [35]9]
  M12.338 BmooMPalpha-I (Bothrops sp.) P85314/MER0104668
  Mycobacterium tuberculosis21/36 (58%) Bradykinin Peptide-Pro↓Phe-Arg [ O07178/-10]
S09.036 POP [31] M13 *

[11/13]		 M13.005 Oligopeptidase O3 (PepO) MER0001059 3/7 (43%) Beta-casein
  ZGPpNA, suc-Ala-Pro-Peptide-Pro↓Val/Ile-Peptide Myxococcus xanthus[11]
Q9X5N2/2BKL S09.076 POP [33] pNA, Gly-Pro-pNA, Pro-pNA 9 60 UV-Vis, FRETS-25Xaa libraries, LC-MS [35]   M13.010 Oligopeptidase O2 (PepO) O52071/MER0004645 4/4 (100%) Beta-casein Peptide-Pro↓Val/Ile-Peptide [12]
Myxococcus xanthus PEP E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET-28b 22 °C/16 h Ni-affinity chromatography Collagen peptide 6–7 36–37 UV-HPLC-MS/MS [19] M34

[3/3]		 M34.002 Pro-Pro endopeptidase 1 (Clostridium difficile-type) MER0494994 13/13 (100%) Putative adhesin Peptide-Asn-Pro↓Pro-Peptide [13
Porphyromonas gingivalis]
Prolyl tripeptidyl aminopeptidase E. coli M15/pQE30-ptpA 30 °C/18 h Butyl-sepharose column Fluorogenic substrate 7.5 30 UV-Vis [49]   M34.003 Pro-Pro endopeptidase 2 MER0328914 3/3 (100%) Putative s-layer protein Peptide-Pro↓Pro-Peptide
Sphaerobacter thermophiles PEP[ E. coli DE3/pET-15b 37 °C/24 h14]
Ni-NTA resin spin column ZGPpNA, gluten peptide 6.6 63 Enzymatic assay, MS [105] M64

[1/1]		 M64.001 IgA peptidase (Clostridium ramosum-type) MER0016067
Sphingomonas capsulate2/2 (100%) PEP E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET-28b 22 °C/16 h DEAE and Blue sepharose chromatographyImmunoglobulin IgA1 Peptide-Pro↓Val-Peptide [15]
Chromogenic Gluten peptide 6–7 36–37 UV-HPLC-MS/MS [19] M72

[2/2]		 M72.002 CpaA g.p. (Acinetobacter baumannii
Insect) MER1365492 2/2 (100%) Coagulation factor XII Peptide-Pro↓Thr-Peptide  [16]
                S6

[4/8]		 S06.001 IgA1-specific serine peptidase (Neisseria-type) MER0000278 6/6 (100%) Immunoglobulin IgA1 Peptide-Pro↓Xaa-Peptide [17]
Eurygaster integriceps PEP E. coli BL21(DE3)/pNYCO 28 °C/16 h Ni-affinity chromatography ZGPpNA, wheat gluten 7.5 37 UV-Vis [106   S06.007 IgA1-specific serine peptidase type 1 (Haemophilus sp.) MER0001759 3/3 (100%) IgA1 chain C region Peptide-Pro↓Thr-Peptide [18]
] S9 *

[21/32]		 S09.001 Prolyl oligopeptidase P23687/MER0000392 50/59 (85%) Alpha/beta-gliadin MM1 Peptide-Pro↓Xaa-Peptide [19]
  S09.002 Prolyl oligopeptidase homologue (Pyrococcus-type) MER0000398 2/3 (67%) Z-Gly-Pro-NHPhNO2 Z-Gly-Pro↓NHPhNO2 [20]
  S09.003 Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (eukaryote) P27487/MER0000401 21/29 (72%) C-X-C motif chemokine 10 Val-Pro↓Leu-Peptide [21]
  S09.006 (sunn pest)Dipeptidyl aminopeptidase B (fungus) P18962/MER0000405 5/7 (71%) Alanyl/prolyl bond Xaa-Ala/Pro↓Xaa E1U339/-[22]
S09.001 PEP [56]   S09.007 Fibroblast activation protein alpha subunit Q12884/MER0000399 6/6 (100%) Alpha-2-antiplasmin Peptide-Pro↓Asn/Leu-Peptide [23]
Suc-Gly-Pro-NHMec Peptide-Pro↓NHMec
  Porphyromonas gingivalis Q7MUW6/2D5L S09.017 PTP [49]
  Serratia marcescens O32449/1QTR S33.001 PAP [50]
  Sphingomonas capsulate Q9ZNM8/- S9.UPA POP [33]
  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia A0A0U5BDB7/- S9.UPW PEP [51]
Fungi Aspergillus niger A2QR21/7WAB S28.004 AN-PEP [38]
  Aspergillus oryzae A0A1S9DCM9/- S28.004 PEP [52]
  Galerina marginata H2E7Q8/5N4C S09.077 POP-B [34]
Haematobia irritans exigua Protozoa Trypanosoma brucei Q6HA27/- S09.033 POP [53]
  Haematobia irritans (buffalo fly) Q10715/- M02.003 PDP [   S09.008 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (Aspergillus
Trypanosoma cruzi Q71MD6/- S09.033 POP [54] 5] -type) MER0004504 6/8 (75%) [Des-Arg]-bradykinin Pro-Pro↓Gly-Peptide [24]
Animals Haliotis discus (abalone) A0A1X9T5X9/6JYM S09.UPA PEP [57]   S09.009 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (bacteria-type 1) Q5NMM8/MER0041840 3/5 (60%) Gly-Pro-NHNap Gly-Pro↓NHNap [25]
  Homo sapiens P48147/3DDU S09.001 POP [58][59]   S09.013 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (bacteria-type 2) Q47900/MER0001423 15/17 (88%) Beta-casein Tyr-Pro↓Phe-Peptide [26
 ]
ANCE P27487/1J2E S09.003 DPP-IV [60]   S09.017 Prolyl tripeptidyl peptidase Q7MUW6/MER0005196 13/13 (100%) Cystatin C Ser-Ser-Pro↓Gly-Peptide [27]
  P42785/3N2Z S28.001 Lysosomal PRCP [61]   S09.018 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 8 Q6V1X1/MER0013484 8/10 (80%) C-X-C motif chemokine 10 Val-Pro↓Leu-Peptide [28]
  Q9BYF1/1R42 M02.006 ACE-2 [62]   S09.019 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 9 Q86TI2/MER0004923 13/15 (87%) RU1 antigenic peptide Val-Pro↓Tyr-Peptide [29]
    S09.033 Prolyl oligopeptidase (zoomastigote) Q4E132/MER0079308 - - - [30]
Mus musculus (mouse) P42676/1I1I M03.002   [31]
  S09.073 Xaa-Pro dipeptidylpeptidase D7UPN5/MER0195666 19/19 (100%) Ala-Pro-NHPhNO2
Insects Drosophila melanogaster Q10714/2X91 M02.003 Xaa-Pro↓NHPhNO2 [32]
  S09.076 Prolyl oligopeptidase (Myxococcus xanthus) Q9X5N2/MER0005694 2/2 (100%) Suc-Ala-Pro-NHPhNO2 Peptide-Pro↓NHPhNO2 [33]
ANCE [55]
  Eurygaster integricepsNeurolysin (POP) [63]
    Q9QUR6/- S09.001 POP [S09.036 Rv0457C peptidase (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) MER0003229 2/2 (100%)   S09.077 Prolyl oligopeptidase B (Galerina marginata) H2E7Q8/MER0325901 3/3 (100%) Alpha-amanitin proprotein 1 Peptide-Pro↓Ile/Trp-Peptide [34]
  S09.UPA Subfamily S9A unassigned peptidases - 3/3 (100%) Gly-Pro-NHPhNO2 Gly-Pro↓NHPhNO2 [35]
S15

[1/1]		 S15.001 Xaa-Pro dipeptidyl-peptidase Q02W78/MER0000443 8/10 (80%) Gly-Pro-NHPhNO2 Gly-Pro↓NHPhNO2 [36]
S28

[2/3]		 S28.001 Lysosomal Pro-Xaa carboxypeptidase P42785/MER0000446 11/11 (100%) Endothelin B receptor-like protein 2 Peptide-Pro↓Ala [37]
  S28.004 Acid prolyl endopeptidase (Aspergillus sp.) A2QR21/MER0093133 - - - [38]
S33

[5/10]		 S33.001 Prolyl aminopeptidase P42786/MER0000431 4/6 (67%) Consensus prolyl bond Pro↓Xaa [39]
64]
  Bothrops sp. (snake) P85314/3GBO M12.338 BmooMPalpha-I [10]
  Sus scrofa (porcine) P23687/1O6G S09.001 POP [45]
Plants Arabidopsis thaliana F4HSS5/- S33.001 PAP [61]
Coffea arabica (coffee) -/- S09.001 POP [65]
Daucus carota (carrot) -/- S09.UPA PEP [66]
Nepenthes sp. (pitcher plant) A0A1V0DK55/- U74.001 Neprosin [67]
Secale cereale × Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (triticale) G9J616/- S33.001 PAP [68]
Spinacia oleracea (spinach) P12301/- U9G.029 PEP [69]
Vigna radiata (mung bean) -/- S28.002 DPP-II [70]
Note: ACE/ANCE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; DPP: dipeptidyl-peptidase; PAP: prolyl aminopeptidase; PDP: peptidyl-dipeptidase; PEP: prolyl endoproteinase; PepO: oligopeptidase O; POP: prolyl oligopeptidase; PRCP: Pro-Xaa carboxypeptidase; -: not available. Italic PDB ID indicates the crystal structure for the homology modeling in SWISS-MODEL.
Based on the sequence alignments and structural models, POP proteins from the MEROPS S9 family have two conserved domains (Figure 1). The C-terminal catalytic α/β-hydrolase domain comprises an alpha/beta/alpha sandwich for protein cleaving, whereas the N-terminal β-propeller domain constitutes β-sheets that limit proteolysis to smaller substrates as a mechanism to avoid non-targeted digestion [33][47][71]. The electron microscopy of human PEP revealed the presence of a new side opening that was not observed in any of the crystallographic structures [71]. Two paths were identified using the CAVER algorithm, leading from the PEP active site to the outside solvent, one through the β-propeller and another one through a large side aperture into the catalytic domain [71].
Figure 1. Crystal structure of a porcine POP (PDB ID: 1QFM). In red is the α/β hydrolase catalytic domain, whereas the β-propeller domain is highlighted in blue. Catalytic triad residues: Ser554, Asp641, and His680 are labeled. The yellow circle indicates a probable accessible path discovered in an electron microscopy study [71].
PEP/POP from different species have different β-propeller sizes, thus conferring specificity to different sizes of substrates targeting proline residues that are usually resistant to protein cleavage by other peptidases [72][73]. For example, studies on Arabidopsis thaliana, Homo sapiens, and Sus scrofa (porcine) showed that each POP possesses a unique affinity toward different sizes of ligands despite high sequence and structural similarities [74]. Besides the pore size of β-propellers, the number of β-propeller blades also plays a role in the substrate specificity of PEP. For instance, the porcine POP (S9a, S09.001) has a seven-bladed β propeller structure that acts as a filtering gate to exclude large peptides from the active site [45], whereas the crystal structure of the human dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP IV) (S9b, S09.003) shows a unique eight-bladed β-propeller (Figure 2). The irregular blade-1 on DPP-IV is hypothesized to allow substrate entry to the catalytic site without going through the gating filter compared to POP [60]. The difference in the β-propeller of POP and DPP-IV could have contributed to the substrate specificity of these two enzymes in which POP hydrolyses small peptides (<30 amino acids) at the C-terminal of proline residues, while DPP-IV cleaves dipeptides at the penultimate proline residue. As compared to the β-propeller domains, the α/β-hydrolase catalytic domain is mostly conserved.
Figure 2. The β-propeller structure of a porcine prolyl oligopeptidase POP (PDB id: 1QFM, left) and a human dipeptidyl peptidase DPP-IV (PDB ID: 1J2E, right). The labeled irregular blade-1 of the eight-blade β-propeller structure could contribute to different substrate specificity between POP and DPP-IV.
There is a recent report of the Aspergillus niger PEP (AN-PEP) structure solved through an x-ray crystallography [38]. AN-PEP belongs to the peptidase family S28 of Pro-Xaa carboxypeptidase, which is in the same SC clan with family S9 sharing the same catalytic site residues (Ser-Asp-His) and likely the same evolutionary origin. The AN-PEP structure consists of 17 α-helices, 10 310helices, and 10 β-strands. In contrast to the POP of peptidase family S9, the β-propeller domain is replaced by a helical SKS domain (Figure 3) that is stabilized by three disulfide bonds. The catalytic pocket of AN-PEP is located between the catalytic α/β hydrolase domain and the SKS domain. AN-PEP is capable of digesting large substrates, unlike POP with a substrate limit of less than 30 amino acids. The substrate specificity could be due to the differences in the catalytic pocket structure formed between the α/β hydrolase and SKS domains in AN-PEP, compared to the β-propeller domain of S9 PEP/POP.
Figure 3. Representative protein structures from the MEROPS peptidase family S9 (porcine muscle prolyl oligopeptidase, PDB ID: 1QFM), S28 (Aspergillus niger prolyl endoprotease, PDB ID: 7WAB), S33 (Serratia marcescens prolyl aminopeptidase, PDB ID: 1QTR), and U74 (AlphaFold2 model of N. × ventrata neprosin, NvNpr), from left to right. The three-dimensional protein structures are oriented with their catalytic domains on top.
Another family of PPCEs is the prolyl aminopeptidase (PAP) from the peptidase family S33, which can be found in apricot seeds [19] and cabbage leaves [75]. Prolyl aminopeptidase (S33.001) is an exopeptidase that catalyzes the removal of the proline residue at the N-terminal of a peptide [50]. Like peptidase families S9 and S28, the catalytic α/β hydrolase domain is present (Figure 3). However, it has a catalytic triad of Ser113, His296, and Asp 268 with a consensus sequence of GXSXG around the catalytic serine residue. The second unannotated helices domain comprises six α-helices that act as a cap to block the N-terminal of the pre-cleavage (P1) proline, thus explaining the exopeptidase catalytic mechanism. PAPs are categorized based on their functioning structures: 30–35 kDa monomers (S33.001) are found exclusively in bacteria, while 100–370 kDa multimers (S33.008) have been reported in bacteria, fungi, and plants. Interestingly, a biochemically characterized plant PAP from triticale is more like the monomeric PAPs than the multimeric form [73]. On the other hand, a protease from the carnivorous tropical pitcher plants known as neprosin with PPC activity was classified as an unknown peptidase family (U74). There is a recent neprosin structure–function analysis based on the AlphaFold2 modeling that suggests neprosin belongs to the glutamic peptidase family with two glutamic acid residues as the catalytic dyad [76]. Unlike the S9, S28, or S33 prolyl proteases, neprosin does not have an α/β hydrolase domain, SKS domain, or β-propeller domain. Instead, neprosin has two uncharacterized domains, namely the neprosin activation domain and the neprosin domain (Figure 3). The neprosin domain is proposed to be the catalytic domain due to the absence of the neprosin activation domain in the active enzyme either in the native or recombinant neprosins [44][77]. Intriguingly, the neprosin domain comprises predominantly β-sheets, which form two antiparallel six- and seven-stranded β-sheets with an overall β-sandwich structure. In comparison, all the PPCEs from family S9, S28, S33, and neprosin have a two-domains structure. The α/β hydrolase domain and neprosin domain act as the catalytic domain, whereas the second domain (SKS, β-propeller, helical, and neprosin activation domains) appears to be involved in other functions such as substrate size limitation in S28 and S33 PEP, potential protein–protein interactions for S9 POP [78], and enzyme maturation/activation in the case of neprosin. Interestingly, two-domain structures are observed in these different families of PPCEs from diverse taxa, despite a lack of homology in amino acid sequences. This suggests a convergent functional and structural evolution. PPC activity has also been reported in a few members of zinc metallopeptidase families (M2, M3, M9D, M12, M13, M34, M64, and M72). Peptidyl-dipeptidase ANCE (M02.003), angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, ACE2 (M02.006), and neurolysin (M03.002) comprise two domains annotated as zinc metallopeptidase domain I and domain II [62][63][79]. An active channel with a bound zinc ion is located in between the two active helices domains connected by small secondary structures (Figure 4). One of the structural differences between ACE2 and neurolysin is the number of the strand of the β-sheet on domain II, where ACE2 has a three-stranded β-sheet, while neurolysin has a five-stranded β-sheet (Figure 4). Furthermore, the more flexible loop structures on neurolysin could have contributed to its wide substrate specificity [63].
Figure 4. Crystal structures of the MEROPS metallopeptidase M02.006 angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, ACE2 (top, PDB ID: 1R42), and M03.002 neurolysin (bottom, PDB ID: 1I1I).
Metallopeptidase M12 BmooMPalpha-I (M12.338, 3gbo) with a molecular mass of 22.6 kDa has conserved features of P-I class snake venom metallopeptidases, namely the five-stranded β-sheet, four long helices, and a short α-helix near N-terminal stabilized by three disulfide bridges [10]. The zinc ion is bound to three histidine residues: His140, His144, and His150 (Figure 5). Additionally, Pro-Pro endopeptidase 1, PPEP-1 (M34.002, 5a0p), and Pro-Pro endopeptidase 2, PPEP-2 (M34.003, 6fpc) shared a very similar structure with an α/β N-terminal domain (NTD) comprising twisted four-stranded β-sheet and three α-helices (α1-α3), and an α C-terminal domain (CTD) with four α-helices (α5-α8) [14][80]. The active site of Pro-Pro endopeptidase 2 is located at the α4-helix that separates NTD and CTD domains. A zinc ion is bound to the catalytic base Glu138, two histidine residues (His137 and His141) from α4-helix, Tyr174 from α5/α6-helices, and Glu181 from α6-helix (Figure 5). The four amino acid substrate loops (S-loops) in PPEP-1 (GGST) and PPEP-2 (SERV) are shown to contribute to the difference in their substrate specificities [14]. Therefore, peptidases with proline-cleaving activity are not confined to the serine peptidase family alone. The advent of accurate ab initio protein structure prediction from sequences will reveal more peptidases conferring PPC activity via different catalytic mechanisms with different structures and provide a further understanding of the structure-function of the PPCEs.
Figure 5. Crystal structures of MEROPS metallopeptidase M12.338 BmooMPalpha-I (left, PDB ID: 3GBO) and M34.003 Pro-Pro endopeptidase 2 (right, PDB ID: 6FPC) with substrate loop (S-loop) SERV in light gray. The zinc ions are shown as yellow spheres.

2.2. Molecular Mechanisms of PPCEs

Typically, PEP/POP from the clan SC of family S9 comprises a catalytic triad with the following order, Ser-Asp-His with the catalytic Ser lies in between the Gly-X-Ser-X-Gly motif [45]. However, there are also “nonclassical” serine proteases such as the Ser/His/Glu, Ser/His/His, and Ser/Glu/Asp triads, Ser/Lys and Ser/His dyads, and even peptidases with a single serine catalyst [81]. For S9 PEP, two major hypotheses on substrate binding mechanism had been proposed. The initial hypothesis is that the substrate enters the filtering gate and the central channel formed by the β-propeller structure before reaching the active site. This theory is supported by Sphingomonas capsulate PEP, as it failed to digest the 33-mer substrate (LQLQPFPQPQLPYPQPQLPYPQPQLPYPQPQPF) effectively with a diameter larger than the 4 Å channel formed by the β-propeller domain. However, this theory cannot explain why S9 PEP from Myxococcus xanthus and Flavobacterium meningosepticum can digest the 33-mer substrate in the same study. Later, it is proposed that substrate binding with the β-propeller domain induces conformation changes, causing the domain to move and expose the active site. This theory is supported by the open state of Sphingomonas capsulate PEP structure, where an opening of 30 Å is observed between the α/β hydrolase and β-propeller domain [33]. Another study obtained an open state of Aeromonus punctata PEP and proposed an induced-fit mechanism as the conformational changes in the PEP can be induced by adding substrate and inhibitor [47]. The open state is achieved when the substrate H2H3 is added, while a closed state occurs after the binding of the Z-prolyl-prolinal (ZPP) inhibitor with PEP (Figure 6). HP35 substrate with over 30 amino acids can enter the active site but is not cleaved, as the catalytic residue is not in an active conformation in the open state, whereas the catalytic pocket with the active catalytic triad conformation in a close state is too small for HP35. Recently, a molecular simulation of Pyrococcus furiosus POP (S09.002) shows that the conformational change is modulated by the “latching loop” mechanism and is essential for the catalysis mechanism of POP, especially for the loop containing catalytic histidine residue (H592) [46]. The conformation of the histidine loop during the shifting of open to close state allows H592 to move closer to the active site for the catalytic triad formation. Chloride ion binding is required for the loop movement with subsequent activation of the POP peptidase catalysis.
Figure 6. Crystal structures of Aeromonas punctata PEP (ApPEP). From left to right: close-state wild type ApPEP with ZPP inhibitor (PDB ID: 3IVM), open-state wild type ApPEP (PDB ID: 3IUL), mutant ApPEP with D266N mutation in an open state (PDB ID: 3IUR) induced by two H2H3 substrates (yellow). The catalytic triad (Ser538, Asp622, and His657) are labeled. However, the loops containing histidine catalytic residue (His657) are missing in the open-state crystal structures as they are unresolved in electron density maps and are inherently flexible.
For peptidase family S28, it is suggested that the difference in the catalytic pocket located between α/β hydrolase and the SKS domain could confer substrate specificity based on the recent AN-PEP crystal structure [38]. The catalytic pocket formed in AN-PEP is wide-open compared to the lysosomal Pro-Xaa carboxypeptidase (PRCP) (S28.001) and dipeptidyl peptidase II, DPP7 (S28.002) with a volume-limited catalytic pocket that will affect the recognition of substrates with different sizes [61]. However, Glu88, Pro205, Trp374, and Trp460 residues are conserved across PEP, PRCP, and DPP7 despite differences in the volumes of catalytic pocket. Different from S9 and S28 families, the S33 family has exopeptidase properties whereby it cleaves the proline residues at the N-terminal of a peptide. Prolyl aminopeptidase (PAP) from Serratia marcescens (S33.001) has a similar α/β hydrolase domain and another smaller helical domain made up of six helices, which are smaller than the SKS domain on S28. The smaller domain of prolyl aminopeptidase is believed to contribute to the exopeptidase specificity of S33 prolyl protease as the specificity hydrophobic pocket is formed on the helical domain [50]. Two mutagenesis studies on prolyl aminopeptidase from Serratia marcescens concur that residues Phe139, Tyr149, and Glu204 play an important role in the substrate recognition [82][83]. Phe139, Tyr149, and Phe236 in the hydrophobic pocket together with Glu204 and Glu232 are involved in electrostatic interactions. The proline recognition is completed by four electrostatic interactions and the insertion of substrate into the hydrophobic pocket of prolyl aminopeptidase [82]. Substrate acetylation could help in the orientation of the substrate in the active cleft for efficient hydrolysis [84]. The catalytic mechanism of peptidase family S28 and S33 could be like that of S9 prolyl endopeptidase, as they shared a similar classical serine catalytic triad of Ser-Asp-His. Other than the serine peptidases, a glutamic peptidase was reported with PPC activity and a catalytic dyad comprising two catalytic glutamic acid residues [4]. In silico analysis of neprosin found a high structural similarity to strawberry mottle virus glutamic peptidase (SMoV peptidase, G03.001) with an overlapping catalytic dyad [76]. This shed light on the possible catalytic mechanism of neprosin. The mature neprosin has a putative accessible active cleft formed by the β-sandwich structure for substrate binding. The catalytic mechanism of glutamic peptidase G3 could be like that of the Gln and Glu catalytic dyad in the G1 family because the main catalytic Glu residue of glutamic peptidase G1 is found to be conserved in the G3 family [85].

2.3. Biochemical Studies of PPCEs

The native (Table 3) and recombinant proteins (Table 4) of PPCEs have been reported for different species, mainly microbes and animals. For the assays of PPC activity, Z-Gly-Pro-pNA (ZGPpNA) and other chromogenic substrates are commonly used [86]. PPCEs specifically cleave at the carboxyl-end of proline residue of the chromogenic substrates, releasing chromogenic pNA (p-nitroanilide) or βNA (β-naphthylamide), which can be detected spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 410 nm and 520 nm, respectively. Due to their specificity, these chromogenic substrates are often used in the functional characterization and activity measurement of PPCEs. Furthermore, proline-rich gliadin is also a common substrate to investigate the capability of certain PPCEs in gluten detoxification. The fragments of gliadin hydrolysates can be detected through ELISA, Western blot, or immunoblot with specific antibodies. To ascertain the protein cleavage sites, a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approach can be taken to identify the digested peptide sequences. Specific amino acid preferences of targeted substrate sequences are curated in the MEROPS database with a collection of cleavage sites (Table 1). The substrate specificity will influence the molecular interactions between the protease and substrate at the active site of the protein with a role in biological functions [87]. Experiments to identify the substrate specificity of PPCEs utilize LC-MS [77] and fluorogenic substrates [88]. One study used the spectrofluorometer to determine the fluorometric Z-Gly-Pro- pNA peptide at the excitation (340 nm) and emission wavelengths (410 nm) [88]. In this research, the POP enzyme was shown to form strong interactions with no more than six residues from positions P4, P3, and P2 (N-side) and P1′ and P2′ (C-side) regardless of the substrate length [88]. PPCEs can hydrolyze proteins with different preferences of amino acids adjacent to the proline residues. For example, the recombinant PEP from a Gram-negative thermophile, Meiothermus ruber H328, shows a stringent preference of residues next to proline but a greater flexibility in preferences of the second and third residues near proline [35]. In a study using 3375 synthetic peptides as substrates of internally quenched fluorogenic probes (IQFPs), about 74% showed high favorability towards proline at the Xaa position [89]. Both cationic and anionic charged residues such as Arg/Lys/Asp/Glu are unfavorable at the subsequent position after proline. The anionic residues are more tolerated in position P2 compared to P3 with strong preferences toward Leu/Ile/Arg/His and low preferences towards Asp/Glu at P3 positions [90]. Therefore, PPCEs have a certain degree of specificity towards their substrates based on their amino acid sequences. Studies on both the native and recombinant PPCEs, mainly PEP/POP, showed similar optimum temperatures with pH 4–6, except for Eurygaster integriceps, Haliotis discus, Sus sucrofa, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Nepenthes × ventrata (Table 3 and Table 4). Most of the native protein studies were based on Aspergillus niger with pH 4–5 and 37 °C. Nearly all recombinant protein characterization studies used Escherichia coli as a cloning and expression host apart from Pichia pastoris and wheat (Table 4). Some PPCEs exhibited different preferences for different substrate lengths and specificity with a broad range of optimum temperatures and pH levels. For instance, a POP (S09.001) cleaves after the C-terminal proline residue in peptide substrates with less than 30 amino acids. In addition to the PPC activity that cleaves at two conserved proline residues of α-amanitin pro-peptide, POP-B from Galerina marginata (GmPOPB, S09.077) has a unique transpeptidation activity that catalyzes macrocyclization of a 25-mer peptide to form a monocyclic octapeptide [34]. A PEP from Aspergillus oryzae (S28.004) exhibits a similar PPC activity at an optimal pH of 2.5 with the capability of digesting much larger substrates such as intact casein [91]. Like S28 PEP, neprosin with a lower molecular mass (~30 kDa) shows PPC activity at pH 2.5 but with no limitation of substrate size [77]. Prolyl aminopeptidase (S33.001) from family S33 has a proline-specific exopeptidase activity that cleaves proline at the N-terminal of a peptide [50]. All PPCEs showed the ability to cleave proline-rich substrates. These studies show the potential of PPCEs from different species for industrial applications with various conditions of pH and temperatures.
Table 3. The optimum conditions of selected native PPCEs in substrate degradation.
Source Enzyme Substrate * pH T (°C) Method to Detect Digested Substrate * Reference
Fungus            
Aspergillus niger PEP Beer hordein - - ELISA RIDASCREEN® Gliadin competitive [92]
      4–5 - Gluten ELISA assay [93]
      - 14 Antibody-based competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
 
 
 
 
Mus musculus
POP Suc-Gly-Pro-AMC 4.2 30 Fluorescence plate reader - - Lectin-affinity

and ion-exchange chromatography		 Angiotensin 1,

cholecystokinin-8		 7.5 37 HPLC [5]
Animals                  
Haliotis discus (abalone) PEP E. coli BL21(DE3) 18 °C/15 h Ni-affinity chromatography
]
Vigna radiata DPP-II -4mβNA and -βNA dipeptides 7.5 37 UV-Vis 520 nm [70]
* -4mβNA: -4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide; -βNA: -beta-naphthylamide; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MS: mass spectrometry; MS/MS: tandem MS; RP-HPLC: reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography; NA: not available; SDS-PAGE: sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ZGPpNA: benzyloxycarbonyl-Gly-Pro-p-nitroanalide.
Table 4. The optimum conditions of selected recombinant PPCEs in substrate degradation.
Source Enzyme Expression Host Expression Purification Substrate pH T (°C) Assay Detection Reference
Fungi               
Aspergillus niger AN-PEP Pischia pastoris GS115/pPIC9K 28 °C/96 h Ni-affinity chromatography ZGPpNA 4–5 35–40 UV-Vis 410 nm [91]
       
[
64
]
Plants
 
 
       
        35 LC-MS/MS [102] [
Aspergillus oryzae Prolyl aminopeptidase Escherichia coli BL21/pET-28a(-)94]
25 °C/12 h Ni-affinity chromatography L-Pro-pNA 6.5–7.5 50 - [103]    
Bacteria  4      37 Gluten ELISA assay [95]
        4.6 37 Western blot, monoclonal antibody-based competition assays [96]
         Nepenthes × ventrata Neprosin α-gliadin 2.5 37 SDS-PAGE, turbidity monitored at 595 nm, MS/MS [44]
Flavobacterium meningosepticum Fm-POP Wheat/pUC57 - - Gluten peptide 6 37 HPLC, ELISA [48]       4–5 37 SDS-PAGE, Western blot, ELISA, HPLC, MS,
    E. coli DH5α/pUC57 + Fmen 37 °C/14 h Geneclean III kit ZGPpNA, gliadin, glutenin[97]
- Up to 90 UV-Vis [104]     Wheat flour, gliadin 4 40 ELISA, immunoblot (anti-PEP-I, anti-PEP-II, and anti-HMW-GS antibodies), RP-HPLC [98]
    N-glycosidase
Meiothermus ruber H328 MrPEP E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET-28b 37 °C/14 h DEAE-cellulose and Phenyl-FF chromatography 4–4.5 37 MALDI-TOF MS [99]
    ZGPpNA 4 37 Turbidity (protein-polyphenol haze) [100]
      4–5 40–50 UV-Vis 410 nm [101]
Insect            
Eurygaster integriceps (sunn pest) PEP ZGPpNA 8 and 10 24–34 UV-Vis 410 nm [56]
Animal     Collagen peptide 6 20 HPLC-MS [33] Spinacia oleracea

PSII membranes		 PEP Co-purified 23 kDa and 18 kDa proteins 6 37 Densitogram
Sus sucrofa POP E. coli Top10/pBAD 37 °C/4–6 h DEAE and Blue sepharose chromatography ZGPpNA -AMC 5–8 30 UV-Vis [107]
Plant                  
Nepenthes × ventrata Neprosin E. coli Arctic Express/pET-28a(+) 16 °C/16 h Ni-affinity chromatography HeLa cell protein 2.5 37–50 MS [77]
  S33.004 Prolyl dipeptidase (Lactobacillus-type) A8YWX2/MER0000437 17/18 (95%) Pro-Gly Pro↓Xaa [40]
[69   S33.008 Prolyl aminopeptidase 2 P46547/MER0001367
    Histone 2.5 37 9/10 (90%) Pro-NHPhNO2 Pro↓NHPhNO2 [41]
LC-MS/MS S37

[1/1]		 S37.001 PS-10 peptidase Q54408/MER0001350 3/3 (100%) Transglutaminase precursor Pepetide-Pro↓Asp-Peptide [42]
[108] U9G

[3/20]		 U9G.029 Prolyl endopeptidase (Spinacia) - 3/3 (100%) Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3, chloroplastic Peptide-Pro↓Ile/Leu-Peptide [43]
U74

[1/1]		 U74.001 Neprosin - 51/110 (46%) Alpha/beta-gliadin MM1 Peptide-Pro↓Xaa-Peptide [44]
↓: cleavage site; -: the linked amino acids; NA: not available; Xaa: any amino acid. † Specificity is based on the MEROPS specificity matrix showing the proportion of proline residue in the P1 cleavage site of all substrate cleavage records. Numbers in square brackets indicate the proportion of subfamily with records of post-proline cleavage (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/merops/cgi-bin/specsearch.pl) (accessed on 15 March 2022) with query XXX-XXX-XXX-PRO|XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX. * Overrepresentation (p < 0.001) is based on the hypergeometric test.

2. Molecular Structure and Biochemistry

2.1. Structural Studies

Protein structures of PPCEs have been studied across different taxa including bacteria, fungi, animals, and plants (Table 2). In this section, researchers selected some of the well-studied structures of PPCEs to depict their similarities and differences in hope of gaining insights on their regulation and molecular mechanisms for further investigations. The protein structures found in the PDB database are mostly solved through X-ray crystallography. The first crystal structure for a prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) was solved in 1998 at 1.4 Å resolution to reveal the α/β hydrolase fold and β-propeller domains with a catalytic triad of Ser-His-Asp [45]. Subsequently, crystal structures were acquired for Sphingomonas capsulate (1.8 Å resolution) and Myxococcus xanthus (1.5 Å resolution)
Note: AMC: 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin; DEAE: diethylaminoethyl; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Hb: hemoglobin; HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; L-Pro-pNA: L-arginyl-L-proline 4-nitroanilide; MS: mass spectrometry; Ni-NTA: Ni2+-nitrilotriacetate; UV-Vis: ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy; ZGPpNA: Z-Gly-Pro-4-nitroanilide; -: not available.

References

  1. Rawlings, N.D.; Barrett, A.J.; Thomas, P.D.; Huang, X.; Bateman, A.; Finn, R.D. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 624–632.
  2. Rawlings, N.D.; Barrett, A.J.; Bateman, A. Asparagine peptide lyases: A seventh catalytic type of proteolytic enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38321–38328.
  3. Rawlings, N.D.; Bateman, A. Origins of peptidases. Biochimie 2019, 166, 4–18.
  4. Mann, K.S.; Chisholm, J.; Sanfaçon, H. Strawberry mottle virus (Family Secoviridae, Order Picornavirales) encodes a novel glutamic protease to process the RNA2 Polyprotein at two cleavage sites. J. Virol. 2019, 93, 1679–1691.
  5. Wijffels, G.; Fitzgerald, C.; Gough, J.; Riding, G.; Elvin, C.; Kemp, D.; Willadsen, P. Cloning and characterisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme from the dipteran species, Haematobia irritans exigua, and its expression in the maturing male reproductive system. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 237, 414–423.
  6. Vickers, C.; Hales, P.; Kaushik, V.; Dick, L.; Gavin, J.; Tang, J.; Godbout, K.; Parsons, T.; Baronas, E.; Hsieh, F.; et al. Hydrolysis of biological peptides by human angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 14838–14843.
  7. Barrett, A.J.; Dando, P.M. Neurolysin. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 356–360.
  8. Maruyama, S. Peptidyl-dipeptidase (Streptomyces). In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 2nd ed.; Barrett, A.J., Woessner, J.F., Rawlings, N.D., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 1030–1031. ISBN 978-0-12-079611-3.
  9. Trummal, K.; Vija, H.; Subbi, J.; Siigur, J. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of substrate specificity of lebetase, a direct-acting fibrinolytic metalloproteinase from Vipera lebetina snake venom. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1476, 331–336.
  10. Akao, P.K.; Tonoli, C.C.; Navarro, M.S.; Cintra, A.C.; Neto, J.R.; Arni, R.K.; Murakami, M.T. Structural studies of BmooMPalpha-I, a non-hemorrhagic metalloproteinase from Bothrops moojeni venom. Toxicon 2010, 55, 361–368.
  11. Soeryapranata, E.; Powers, J.R.; Ünlü, G. Cloning and characterization of debittering peptidases, PepE, PepO, PepO2, PepO3, and PepN, of Lactobacillus helveticus WSU19. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 1096–1106.
  12. Chen, Y.S.; Christensen, J.E.; Broadbent, J.R.; Steele, J.L. Identification and characterization of Lactobacillus helveticus PepO2, an endopeptidase with post-proline specificity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1276–1282.
  13. Hensbergen, P.J.; Klychnikov, O.I.; Bakker, D.; van Winden, V.J.; Ras, N.; Kemp, A.C.; Cordfunke, R.A.; Dragan, I.; Deelder, A.M.; Kuijper, E.J.; et al. A novel secreted metalloprotease (CD2830) from Clostridium difficile cleaves specific proline sequences in LPXTG cell surface proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2014, 13, 1231–1244.
  14. Klychnikov, O.I.; Shamorkina, T.M.; Weeks, S.D.; van Leeuwen, H.C.; Corver, J.; Drijfhout, J.W.; van Veelen, P.A.; Sluchanko, N.N.; Strelkov, S.V.; Hensbergen, P.J. Discovery of a new Pro-Pro endopeptidase, PPEP-2, provides mechanistic insights into the differences in substrate specificity within the PPEP family. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 11154–11165.
  15. Fujiyama, Y.; Iwaki, M.; Hodohara, K.; Hosoda, S.; Kobayashi, K. The site of cleavage in human alpha chains of IgA1 and IgA2:A2m(1) allotype paraproteins by the clostridial IGA protease. Mol. Immunol. 1986, 23, 147–150.
  16. Waack, U.; Warnock, M.; Yee, A.; Huttinger, Z.; Smith, S.; Kumar, A.; Deroux, A.; Ginsburg, D.; Mobley, H.L.T.; Lawrence, D.A.; et al. CpaA Is a glycan-specific adamalysin-like protease secreted by Acinetobacter baumannii that inactivates coagulation factor XII. mBio 2018, 9, e01606–e01618.
  17. Poulsen, K.; Kilian, M. IgA1-specific serine endopeptidase. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 3, pp. 3088–3092.
  18. Mistry, D.V.; Stockley, R.A. The cleavage specificity of an IgA1 protease from Haemophilus influenzae. Virulence 2011, 2, 103–110.
  19. Shan, L.; Marti, T.; Sollid, L.M.; Gray, G.M.; Khosla, C. Comparative biochemical analysis of three bacterial prolyl endopeptidases: Implications for coeliac sprue. Biochem. J. 2004, 383, 311–318.
  20. Harris, M.N.; Madura, J.D.; Ming, L.J.; Harwood, V.J. Kinetic and mechanistic studies of prolyl oligopeptidase from the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19310–19317.
  21. Lambeir, A.M.; Proost, P.; Durinx, C.; Bal, G.; Senten, K.; Augustyns, K.; Scharpé, S.; Van Damme, J.; De Meester, I. Kinetic investigation of chemokine truncation by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV reveals a striking selectivity within the chemokine family. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 29839–29845.
  22. Misumi, Y.; Ikehara, Y. Dipeptidyl-peptidases A and B. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 3, pp. 3390–3391.
  23. Lee, K.N.; Jackson, K.W.; Christiansen, V.J.; Lee, C.S.; Chun, J.G.; McKee, P.A. Antiplasmin-cleaving enzyme is a soluble form of fibroblast activation protein. Blood 2006, 107, 1397–1404.
  24. Monod, M.; Beauvais, A. Dipeptidyl-peptidases IV and V of Aspergillus. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 3, pp. 3392–3394.
  25. Nakajima, Y.; Ito, K.; Toshima, T.; Egawa, T.; Zheng, H.; Oyama, H.; Wu, Y.F.; Takahashi, E.; Kyono, K.; Yoshimoto, T. Dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia exhibits activity against a substrate containing a 4-hydroxyproline residue. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 7819–7829.
  26. Banbula, A.; Bugno, M.; Goldstein, J.; Yen, J.; Nelson, D.; Travis, J.; Potempa, J. Emerging family of proline-specific peptidases of Porphyromonas gingivalis: Purification and characterization of serine dipeptidyl peptidase, a structural and functional homologue of mammalian prolyl dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 1176–1182.
  27. Banbula, A.; Mak, P.; Bugno, M.; Silberring, J.; Dubin, A.; Nelson, D.; Travis, J.; Potempa, J. Prolyl tripeptidyl peptidase from Porphyromonas gingivalis. A novel enzyme with possible pathological implications for the development of periodontitis. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 9246–9252.
  28. Ajami, K.; Pitman, M.R.; Wilson, C.H.; Park, J.; Menz, R.I.; Starr, A.E.; Cox, J.H.; Abbott, C.A.; Overall, C.M.; Gorrell, M.D. Stromal cell-derived factors 1alpha and 1beta, inflammatory protein-10 and interferon-inducible T cell chemo-attractant are novel substrates of dipeptidyl peptidase 8. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 819–825.
  29. Geiss-Friedlander, R.; Parmentier, N.; Möller, U.; Urlaub, H.; Van den Eynde, B.J.; Melchior, F. The cytoplasmic peptidase DPP9 is rate-limiting for degradation of proline-containing peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 27211–27219.
  30. Grellier, P.; Vendeville, S.; Joyeau, R.; Bastos, I.M.; Drobecq, H.; Frappier, F.; Teixeira, A.R.; Schrével, J.; Davioud-Charvet, E.; Sergheraert, C.; et al. Trypanosoma cruzi prolyl oligopeptidase Tc80 is involved in nonphagocytic mammalian cell invasion by trypomastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47078–47086.
  31. Portugal, B.; Motta, F.N.; Correa, A.F.; Nolasco, D.O.; de Almeida, H.; Magalhães, K.G.; Atta, A.L.; Vieira, F.D.; Bastos, I.M.; Santana, J.M. Mycobacterium tuberculosis prolyl oligopeptidase induces in vitro secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by peritoneal macrophages. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 155.
  32. Hatanaka, T.; Yamasato, A.; Arima, J.; Usuki, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kumagai, Y. Extracellular production and characterization of Streptomyces X-prolyl dipeptidyl aminopeptidase. Appl. Biochem. 2011, 164, 475–486.
  33. Shan, L.; Mathews, I.I.; Khosla, C. Structural and mechanistic analysis of two prolyl endopeptidases: Role of interdomain dynamics in catalysis and specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3599–3604.
  34. Luo, H.; Hong, S.-Y.; Sgambelluri, R.M.; Angelos, E.; Li, X.; Walton, J.D. Peptide macrocyclization catalyzed by a prolyl oligopeptidase involved in α-amanitin biosynthesis. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 1610–1617.
  35. Yamamoto, F.; Morisaka, H.; Ueda, M.; Watanabe, K. Molecular characterization of a prolyl endopeptidase from a feather-degrading thermophile Meiothermus ruber H328. J. Biochem. 2020, 168, 499–508.
  36. Jobin, M.C.; Martinez, G.; Motard, J.; Gottschalk, M.; Grenier, D. Cloning, purification, and enzymatic properties of dipeptidyl peptidase IV from the swine pathogen Streptococcus suis. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 795–799.
  37. Zhao, X.; Southwick, K.; Cardasis, H.L.; Du, Y.; Lassman, M.E.; Xie, D.; El-Sherbeini, M.; Geissler, W.M.; Pryor, K.D.; Verras, A.; et al. Peptidomic profiling of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies YPRPIHPA as a novel substrate for prolylcarboxypeptidase. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2882–2886.
  38. Miyazono, K.-i.; Kubota, K.; Takahashi, K.; Tanokura, M. Crystal structure and substrate recognition mechanism of the prolyl endoprotease PEP from Aspergillus niger. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 591, 76–81.
  39. Ito, K.; Nakajima, Y.; Yoshimoto, T. Prolyl aminopeptidase. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 3, pp. 3438–3443.
  40. Huang, Y.; Tanaka, T. Characterization of two putative prolinases (PepR1 and PepR2) from Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1: Occurrence of two isozymes with structural similarity and different catalytic properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1854, 91–100.
  41. Stepaniak, L. Isolation and characterization of proline iminopeptidase from Propionibacterium freudenreichii ATCC 9614. Food/Nahrung 2000, 44, 102–106.
  42. Umezawa, Y.; Yokoyama, K.; Kikuchi, Y.; Date, M.; Ito, K.; Yoshimoto, T.; Matsui, H. Novel prolyl tri/tetra-peptidyl aminopeptidase from Streptomyces mobaraensis: Substrate specificity and enzyme gene cloning. J. Biochem. 2004, 136, 293–300.
  43. Kuwabara, T. Characterization of a prolyl endopeptidase from spinach thylakoids. FEBS Lett. 1992, 300, 127–130.
  44. Rey, M.; Yang, M.; Lee, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sheff, J.G.; Sensen, C.W.; Mrazek, H.; Halada, P.; Man, P.; McCarville, J.L.; et al. Addressing proteolytic efficiency in enzymatic degradation therapy for celiac disease. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30980.
  45. Fülöp, V.; Böcskei, Z.; Polgár, L. Prolyl oligopeptidase: An unusual beta-propeller domain regulates proteolysis. Cell 1998, 94, 161–170.
  46. Ellis-Guardiola, K.; Rui, H.; Beckner, R.L.; Srivastava, P.; Sukumar, N.; Roux, B.; Lewis, J.C. Crystal structure and conformational dynamics of Pyrococcus furiosus prolyl oligopeptidase. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 1616–1626.
  47. Li, M.; Chen, C.; Davies, D.R.; Chiu, T.K. Induced-fit mechanism for prolyl endopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 21487–21495.
  48. Osorio, C.E.; Wen, N.; Mejias, J.H.; Liu, B.; Reinbothe, S.; von Wettstein, D.; Rustgi, S. Development of wheat genotypes expressing a glutamine-specific endoprotease from barley and a prolyl endopeptidase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum or Pyrococcus furiosus as a potential remedy to celiac disease. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 19, 123–136.
  49. Schulze, A.; Wermann, M.; Demuth, H.U.; Yoshimoto, T.; Ramsbeck, D.; Schlenzig, D.; Schilling, S. Continuous assays for meprin alpha and beta using prolyl tripeptidyl aminopeptidase (PtP) from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 559, 11–16.
  50. Yoshimoto, T.; Kabashima, T.; Uchikawa, K.; Inoue, T.; Tanaka, N.; Nakamura, K.T.; Tsuru, M.; Ito, K. Crystal structure of prolyl aminopeptidase from Serratia marcescens. J. Biochem. 1999, 126, 559–565.
  51. Yu, J.; Wu, J.; Xie, D.; Du, L.; Tang, Y.J.; Xie, J.; Wei, D. Characterization and rational design for substrate specificity of a prolyl endopeptidase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 138, 109548.
  52. Kang, C.; Yu, X.W.; Xu, Y. Cloning and expression of a novel prolyl endopeptidase from Aspergillus oryzae and its application in beer stabilization. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 42, 263–272.
  53. Bastos, I.M.D.; Motta, F.N.; Grellier, P.; Santana, J.M. Parasite prolyl oligopeptidases and the challenge of designing chemotherapeuticals for Chagas disease, leishmaniasis and African trypanosomiasis. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3103–3115.
  54. Bastos, I.M.; Grellier, P.; Martins, N.F.; Cadavid-Restrepo, G.; de Souza-Ault, M.R.; Augustyns, K.; Teixeira, A.R.; Schrével, J.; Maigret, B.; da Silveira, J.F.; et al. Molecular, functional and structural properties of the prolyl oligopeptidase of Trypanosoma cruzi (POP Tc80), which is required for parasite entry into mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 2005, 388, 29–38.
  55. Houard, X.; Williams, T.A.; Michaud, A.; Dani, P.; Isaac, R.E.; Shirras, A.D.; Coates, D.; Corvol, P. The Drosophila melanogaster-related angiotensin-I-converting enzymes Acer and Ance--distinct enzymic characteristics and alternative expression during pupal development. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 257, 599–606.
  56. Darkoh, C.; El-Bouhssini, M.; Baum, M.; Clack, B. Characterization of a prolyl endoprotease from Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Sunn pest) infested wheat. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 74, 163–178.
  57. Li, W.Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Hu, J.J.; Mengist, H.M.; Liu, G.M.; Jin, T.; Cao, M.J. Characterization and crystal structure of prolyl endopeptidase from abalone (Haliotis discus hannai). Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127452–127461.
  58. Goossens, F.; De Meester, I.; Vanhoof, G.; Hendriks, D.; Vriend, G.; Scharpé, S. The purification, characterization and analysis of primary and secondary-structure of prolyl oligopeptidase from human lymphocytes. Evidence that the enzyme belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase fold family. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 233, 432–441.
  59. Myöhänen, T.T.; Pyykkö, E.; Männistö, P.T.; Carpen, O. Distribution of prolyl oligopeptidase in human peripheral tissues and in ovarian and colorectal tumors. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 706–715.
  60. Hiramatsu, H.; Kyono, K.; Higashiyama, Y.; Fukushima, C.; Shima, H.; Sugiyama, S.; Inaka, K.; Yamamoto, A.; Shimizu, R. The structure and function of human dipeptidyl peptidase IV, possessing a unique eight-bladed beta-propeller fold. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 302, 849–854.
  61. Soisson, S.M.; Patel, S.B.; Abeywickrema, P.D.; Byrne, N.J.; Diehl, R.E.; Hall, D.L.; Ford, R.E.; Reid, J.C.; Rickert, K.W.; Shipman, J.M.; et al. Structural definition and substrate specificity of the S28 protease family: The crystal structure of human prolylcarboxypeptidase. BMC Struct. Biol. 2010, 10, 16.
  62. Towler, P.; Staker, B.; Prasad, S.G.; Menon, S.; Tang, J.; Parsons, T.; Ryan, D.; Fisher, M.; Williams, D.; Dales, N.A.; et al. ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 17996–18007.
  63. Brown, C.K.; Madauss, K.; Lian, W.; Beck, M.R.; Tolbert, W.D.; Rodgers, D.W. Structure of neurolysin reveals a deep channel that limits substrate access. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 3127–3132.
  64. Myöhänen, T.T.; Venäläinen, J.I.; García-Horsman, J.A.; Piltonen, M.; Männistö, P.T. Distribution of prolyl oligopeptidase in the mouse whole-body sections and peripheral tissues. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 993–1003.
  65. Singh, R.K.; Irikura, B.; Nagai, C.; Albert, H.H.; Kumagai, M.H.; Paull, R.E.; Moore, P.H.; Wang, M.-l.J.T.P.B. Characterization of prolyl oligopeptidase genes differentially expressed between two cultivars of Coffea arabica L. Trop. Plant Biol. 2011, 4, 203–216.
  66. Yoshimoto, T.; Abdus Sattar, A.K.M.; Hirose, W.; Tsuru, D. Studies on prolyl endopeptidase from carrot (Daucus carota): Purification and enzymatic properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1987, 916, 29–37.
  67. Ravee, R.; Baharin, A.; Cho, W.T.; Ting, T.Y.; Goh, H.H. Protease activity is maintained in Nepenthes ampullaria digestive fluids depleted of endogenous proteins with compositional changes. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 1967–1978.
  68. Szawłowska, U.; Grabowska, A.; Zdunek-Zastocka, E.; Bielawski, W. TsPAP1 encodes a novel plant prolyl aminopeptidase whose expression is induced in response to suboptimal growth conditions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 419, 104–109.
  69. Kuwabara, T.; Suzuki, K. A prolyl endoproteinase that acts specifically on the extrinsic 18-kDa protein of photosystem II: Purification and further characterization. Plant Cell Physiol. 1994, 35, 665–675.
  70. Khaket, T.P.; Dhanda, S.; Jodha, D.; Singh, J. Purification and biochemical characterization of dipeptidyl peptidase-II (DPP7) homologue from germinated Vigna radiata seeds. Bioorganic Chem. 2015, 63, 132–141.
  71. Tarragó, T.; Martín-Benito, J.; Sabidó, E.; Claasen, B.; Madurga, S.; Gairí, M.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Giralt, E. A new side opening on prolyl oligopeptidase revealed by electron microscopy. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3344–3348.
  72. Kaushik, S.; Sowdhamini, R. Structural analysis of prolyl oligopeptidases using molecular docking and dynamics: Insights into conformational changes and ligand binding. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 26251–26268.
  73. Zdunek-Zastocka, E.; Grabowska, A.; Branicki, T.; Michniewska, B. Biochemical characterization of the triticale TsPAP1, a new type of plant prolyl aminopeptidase, and its impact on proline content and flowering time in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 116, 18–26.
  74. Jouanin, A.; Gilissen, L.J.W.J.; Schaart, J.G.; Leigh, F.J.; Cockram, J.; Wallington, E.J.; Boyd, L.A.; van den Broeck, H.C.; van der Meer, I.M.; America, A.H.P.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of gluten in wheat to reduce gluten content and exposure—Reviewing methods to screen for coeliac safety. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7.
  75. Marinova, M.; Dolashki, A.; Altenberend, F.; Stevanovic, S.; Voelter, W.; Tchorbanov, B. Characterization of an aminopeptidase and a proline iminopeptidase from cabbage leaves. Z. Nat. C J. Biosci. 2008, 63, 105–112.
  76. Ting, T.Y.; Baharin, A.; Ramzi, A.B.; Ng, C.-L.; Goh, H.-H. Neprosin belongs to a new family of glutamic peptidase based on in silico evidence. bioRxiv 2022. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.22.481544v2.abstract (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  77. Schräder, C.U.; Lee, L.; Rey, M.; Sarpe, V.; Man, P.; Sharma, S.; Zabrouskov, V.; Larsen, B.; Schriemer, D.C. Neprosin, a selective prolyl endoprotease for bottom-up proteomics and histone mapping. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 1162–1171.
  78. Männistö, P.T.; García-Horsman, J.A. Mechanism of Action of Prolyl Oligopeptidase (PREP) in Degenerative Brain Diseases: Has Peptidase Activity Only a Modulatory Role on the Interactions of PREP with Proteins? Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 27.
  79. Kim, H.M.; Shin, D.R.; Yoo, O.J.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.O. Crystal structure of Drosophila angiotensin I-converting enzyme bound to captopril and lisinopril. FEBS Lett. 2003, 538, 65–70.
  80. Schacherl, M.; Pichlo, C.; Neundorf, I.; Baumann, U. Structural basis of proline-proline peptide bond specificity of the metalloprotease Zmp1 implicated in motility of Clostridium difficile. Structure 2015, 23, 1632–1642.
  81. Ekici, O.D.; Paetzel, M.; Dalbey, R.E. Unconventional serine proteases: Variations on the catalytic Ser/His/Asp triad configuration. Protein Sci. 2008, 17, 2023–2037.
  82. Inoue, T.; Ito, K.; Tozaka, T.; Hatakeyama, S.; Tanaka, N.; Nakamura, K.T.; Yoshimoto, T. Novel inhibitor for prolyl aminopeptidase from Serratia marcescens and studies on the mechanism of substrate recognition of the enzyme using the inhibitor. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 416, 147–154.
  83. Ito, K.; Inoue, T.; Kabashima, T.; Kanada, N.; Huang, H.S.; Ma, X.; Azmi, N.; Azab, E.; Yoshimoto, T. Substrate recognition mechanism of prolyl aminopeptidase from Serratia marcescens. J. Biochem. 2000, 128, 673–678.
  84. Nakajima, Y.; Ito, K.; Sakata, M.; Xu, Y.; Nakashima, K.; Matsubara, F.; Hatakeyama, S.; Yoshimoto, T. Unusual extra space at the active site and high activity for acetylated hydroxyproline of prolyl aminopeptidase from Serratia marcescens. J. Bacteriol. Res. 2006, 188, 1599–1606.
  85. Pillai, B.; Cherney, M.M.; Hiraga, K.; Takada, K.; Oda, K.; James, M.N. Crystal structure of scytalidoglutamic peptidase with its first potent inhibitor provides insights into substrate specificity and catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 343–361.
  86. Nagatsu, T.; Hino, M.; Fuyamada, H.; Hayakawa, T.; Sakakibara, S. New chromogenic substrates for X-prolyl dipeptidyl-aminopeptidase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 74, 466–476.
  87. Schauperl, M.; Fuchs, J.E.; Waldner, B.J.; Huber, R.G.; Kramer, C.; Liedl, K.R. Characterizing Protease Specificity: How Many Substrates Do We Need? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142658.
  88. Fülöp, V.; Szeltner, Z.; Renner, V.; Polgár, L. Structures of prolyl oligopeptidase substrate/inhibitor complexes. Use of inhibitor binding for titration of the catalytic histidine residue. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1262–1266.
  89. Jambunathan, K.; Watson, D.S.; Endsley, A.N.; Kodukula, K.; Galande, A.K. Comparative analysis of the substrate preferences of two post-proline cleaving endopeptidases, prolyl oligopeptidase and fibroblast activation protein α. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 2507–2512.
  90. Gorrão, S.S.; Hemerly, J.P.; Lima, A.R.; Melo, R.L.; Szeltner, Z.; Polgár, L.; Juliano, M.A.; Juliano, L. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) peptides and cycloretro-inverso peptides derived from bradykinin as substrates and inhibitors of prolyl oligopeptidase. Peptides 2007, 28, 2146–2154.
  91. Kang, C.; Yu, X.; Xu, Y.J.J.o.M.C.B.-e. A codon-optimized endoprotease Endo-Pro-Aspergillus niger: Over expression and high-density fermentation in Pichia pastoris. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2014, 104, 64–69.
  92. Rees, D.; Holtrop, G.; Chope, G.; Moar, K.M.; Cruickshank, M.; Hoggard, N. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial to evaluate bread, in which gluten has been pre-digested by prolyl endoprotease treatment, in subjects self-reporting benefits of adopting a gluten-free or low-gluten diet. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 119, 496–506.
  93. König, J.; Holster, S.; Bruins, M.J.; Brummer, R.J. Randomized clinical trial: Effective gluten degradation by Aspergillus niger-derived enzyme in a complex meal setting. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13100.
  94. Taylor, J.P.; Jacob, F.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Reduction of hordein content in beer by applying prolyl endoprotease to the malting process. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 262–268.
  95. Montserrat, V.; Bruins, M.J.; Edens, L.; Koning, F. Influence of dietary components on Aspergillus niger prolyl endoprotease mediated gluten degradation. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 440–445.
  96. Mitea, C.; Havenaar, R.; Drijfhout, J.W.; Edens, L.; Dekking, L.; Koning, F. Efficient degradation of gluten by a prolyl endoprotease in a gastrointestinal model: Implications for coeliac disease. Gut 2008, 57, 25–32.
  97. Stepniak, D.; Spaenij-Dekking, L.; Mitea, C.; Moester, M.; de Ru, A.; Baak-Pablo, R.; van Veelen, P.; Edens, L.; Koning, F. Highly efficient gluten degradation with a newly identified prolyl endoprotease: Implications for celiac disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2006, 291, G621–G629.
  98. Mohan Kumar, B.V.; Sarabhai, S.; Prabhasankar, P. Targeted degradation of gluten proteins in wheat flour by prolyl endoprotease and its utilization in low immunogenic pasta for gluten sensitivity population. J. Cereal Sci. 2019, 87, 59–67.
  99. Sebela, M.; Rehulka, P.; Kábrt, J.; Rehulková, H.; Ozdian, T.; Raus, M.; Franc, V.; Chmelík, J. Identification of N-glycosylation in prolyl endoprotease from Aspergillus niger and evaluation of the enzyme for its possible application in proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 44, 1587–1595.
  100. Lopez, M.; Edens, L. Effective prevention of chill-haze in beer using an acid proline-specific endoprotease from Aspergillus niger. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7944–7949.
  101. Zhao, F.; Hou, T.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, S.; Wang, Q.; Xian, M.; Mu, X. Immobilization of proline-specific endoprotease on nonporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with amino group. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 504–518.
  102. Kang, C.; Yu, X.W.; Xu, Y. Gene cloning and enzymatic characterization of an endoprotease Endo-Pro-Aspergillus niger. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 855–864.
  103. Liu, D.; Zhang, D.; Huang, Q.; Gu, L.; Zhou, N.; Tian, Y. Mutagenesis for improvement of activity and stability of prolyl aminopeptidase from Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 191, 1483–1498.
  104. Osorio, C.E.; Wen, N.; Mejías, J.H.; Mitchell, S.; von Wettstein, D.; Rustgi, S. Directed-mutagenesis of Flavobacterium meningosepticum prolyl-oligopeptidase and a glutamine-specific endopeptidase from barley. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 11.
  105. Shetty, R.; Vestergaard, M.; Jessen, F.; Hägglund, P.; Knorr, V.; Koehler, P.; Prakash, H.S.; Hobley, T.J. Discovery, cloning and characterisation of proline specific prolyl endopeptidase, a gluten degrading thermo-stable enzyme from Sphaerobacter thermophiles. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2017, 107, 57–63.
  106. Yandamuri, R.C.; Gautam, R.; Darkoh, C.; Dareddy, V.; El-Bouhssini, M.; Clack, B.A. Cloning, expression, sequence analysis and homology modeling of the prolyl endoprotease from Eurygaster integriceps Puton. Insects 2014, 5, 762–782.
  107. Venäläinen, J.I.; Juvonen, R.O.; Forsberg, M.M.; Garcia-Horsman, A.; Poso, A.; Wallen, E.A.; Gynther, J.; Männistö, P.T. Substrate-dependent, non-hyperbolic kinetics of pig brain prolyl oligopeptidase and its tight binding inhibition by JTP-4819. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 463–471.
  108. Schräder, C.U.; Ziemianowicz, D.S.; Merx, K.; Schriemer, D.C. Simultaneous proteoform analysis of histones H3 and H4 with a simplified middle-down proteomics method. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3083–3090.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback