Zero-Waste Manufacturing: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Lindsay Dong and Version 1 by Omojola Awogbemi.

At first glance, zero waste (ZW) means complete and total elimination or absence of waste. However, much more than that, ZW entails waste prevention and where all materials are reused. It is a philosophy that forbids sending any unused material to landfills, dumpsites, or incinerators.

  • zero waste
  • waste minimization
  • manufacturing
  • waste recycling

1. Zero Waste Manufacturing

At first glance, zero waste (ZW) means complete and total elimination or absence of waste. However, much more than that, ZW entails waste prevention and where all materials are reused. It is a philosophy that forbids sending any unused material to landfills, dumpsites, or incinerators. Under ZW, the keyword is conservation of resources. It involves responsible utilization, re-utilization, and recycling of resources to safeguard human health and preserve the environment [7][1]. The Zero Waste International Alliance (ZWIA), an organization working towards a world without waste, seeks to eliminate wastes by resisting incineration, landfilling, and dumping but by developing innovative ways of promoting resource conservation and waste conversion to use raw materials for the production process and for the sustainability of the environment [8,9][2][3].
Improved waste management, inappropriate waste disposal, open dumping of waste, and landfilling pollutes natural habitats (air, land, and water) and exacerbates health-related problems. Greenhouse gases such as carbon monoxide and methane generated from the refuse heaps at dumpsites promote air pollution, whereas the leachate formed in the landfills contaminates ground and surface water sources. Proper waste management strategies including waste prevention, minimization, remediation, and re-utilization can help solve many avoidable problems and safeguard the ecosystem.
Zero waste manufacturing (ZWM) entails the various techniques that promote a manufacturing system that utilizes minimum materials, generates minimum wastes, and encourages waste re-utilization. Though wastes cannot be completely prevented in manufacturing processes, strategies that allow waste prevention, minimization, recycling, redesigning, and re-use contribute towards ZWM processes. Waste generated from manufacturing can be substantially reduced by the adoption of methodologies that allow a product to be used for other applications after becoming obsolete or undesirable for its primary application. This means creating a product with multi-utility capability and a dependable service life across multiple utilization cycles is a way to achieve ZW in the manufacturing sector. Additionally, conventional manufacturing processing poses a great challenge to the concept of sustainable material utilization, lean material production, and minimum material removal during production. To achieve ZWM, innovative manufacturing techniques and pathways must be adopted and utilized.

2. Major Avenues for Achieving ZWM

2.1. Application of Innovative Technologies

The advent of new technologies has led to improvement in every facet of the economy and lives. The performance of the manufacturing sector has been enhanced by the introduction of various innovative, fast and cost-saving technologies. The fourth industrial revolution (4IR) combines physical, digital, and biological technologies that improve the flexibility, agility, and pace of production systems to meet the rising demand for goods and services. The 4IR involves the application of notable technologies such as the IoT, big data, analytics, robotics, additive manufacturing, machine learning, lean manufacturing, AI, high-performance computing, among others, to produce high-quality products in a cost-effective, labor friendly and environmentally friendly manner [13][4]. The deployment of 4IR technologies in the manufacturing sector has enhanced productivity, improved product usefulness, reduced energy consumption, ameliorated emission of toxic gases, and led to waste reduction [14,15][5][6]. Various researchers have utilized technologies to improve manufacturing processes and outcomes to raise productivity while minimizing waste. In extant research, Lu [16][7] and Wang et al. [17][8] chronicled the application of 4IR technologies such as the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cloud computing, big data analytics, robotics, etc. in the manufacturing sector towards improved efficiency, environmental sustainability, energy management, cost reduction, and waste minimization. There are many advantages derivable from the application of innovative technologies to ensure effective manufacturing systems though with obvious challenges (Table 21). The application of AI ensures automation and precision manufacturing thereby reducing waste when compared with human or traditional manufacturing processes [18,19][9][10].
Table 21.
Benefits and limitations of 4IR technologies in manufacturing.
Technologies Benefits Limitation Ref.
AI Precision manufacturing

Automation		 High initial cost.

Requires maintenance and complex

programming		 [18,19][9][10]
Robotic Higher output efficiency

Precision manufacturing

Additive manufacturing

Elimination of errors

Repetitive operation efficiency

Enhance productivity and reliability		 Lack of imagination,

ingenuity, and

personality

High initial financial

investment

Industrial robots require sophisticated operation, maintenance, and

programming		 [20,21][11][12]
Robotic

machining		 Waste reduction

Better quality products

Consistency in operation		 Scarce expertise

High initial investment

High running cost		 [22,23][13][14]
Big data

analytics		 Ensure mass product customization

Attainment of zero-defect product.

Intelligent process monitoring

Online and offline breakdown

prediction

Intelligent predictive and preventive maintenance

Reduction in downtime due to

machine or human failure		 High energy utilization

Concerns about

cybersecurity

Likelihood of identity breaches, identity theft, and data loss

Connectivity and

communication		 [24,25][15][16]
Cloud

computing		 Zero defect

Zero waste

User friendly and convenient

Real time machine monitoring

Data security in the cloud

Opportunities for upskilling

Scalability and flexibility

Cost minimization

Maximum efficiency

Compatibility with older systems		 Technology

vulnerabilities

Data leakage, loss, or theft

Unreliable internet

communication

Uncontrollable resources		 [26,27,28][17][18][19]
Waste prevention and reduction

Innovativeness

Flexibility

Improved performance		 Relatively new and

immature

No standard of

implementation		 [29][20]
Waste reduction, reuse, and

recovery

Flexibility and scalability

Increased process resilience		 Cyber security issues

Difficulties in technology integration		 [30][21]

Additionally, robotic technology helps in automation, performs hazardous jobs, and does repetitive jobs for a long duration with minimum errors due to fatigue thereby ensuring waste prevention and minimization [20,21][11][12].

The continuous application of novel technologies and manufacturing techniques holds the key to less waste generation, fewer product errors, and smarter products in the foreseeable future. Though the use of these technologies comes with increased cost, the benefit of their adaptation will be visible in reducing waste and waste management costs, lower cost of materials, and near abrogation of defective products. Effective man-computer symbiotic association, also called Augmented Intelligence can address some of the emerging challenges and increase production output at reduced cost and man-hour.

3.2. Total Waste Recycling and Reuse in Manufacuring

2.2. Total Waste Recycling and Reuse in Manufacuring

Waste recycling and reuse is a viable way of waste minimization, waste reduction, and waste management. Most of the items that are discarded by mankind and end up in dumpsites can be recycled and reused. Waste recycling and reuse reduces the number of wastes sent to landfills and incinerators, ensures conservation of natural resources, saves energy, reduce pollution and contamination, and supports the manufacturing sector. Recycling of wastes from the manufacturing sector reduces the use of new raw materials, minimizes environmental impacts of waste treatment and disposal, saves money, and ensures that minimum energy is consumed during product manufacturing. For sustainable wastes recycling systems, the waste generated must be collected, sorted, processed, converted to other usable items, and the consumers are encouraged to patronize items produced from recycled materials. Paper and cardboard, plastic, food, metals, rubber and leather, textiles, wood, stones and brick, glass, and ceramics are the common wastes that can be recycled and reused [31][22]. Although metal scraps can be converted into aluminum cans, nails, and other steel products, waste papers are transformed into egg cartons, cereal boxes, paper towels, newspapers, glass containers, laundry detergent bottles, etc. are made from waste glass.

32.2.1. Waste Glass

One of the most reported uses of waste glass is as a substitute for fine aggregates and concrete to reduce the cost and environmental impact of Portland cement production [32,33,34][23][24][25]. To further demonstrate this position, Tamanna et al. [35][26] and Lu et al. [36][27] investigated the deployment of crushed waste glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregates in concrete. The generated concrete exhibited better strength, durability, and improvements in other mechanical properties when used for building and road construction. Waste glass has also been recycled and converted to an architectural mortar with improved durability, compressive strength, and workability [37][28]. In extant research, Keawthun et al. [38][29] demonstrated the application of recycled waste glass when they recovered sodium silicate from recycled waste glass. The water glass finds applications as sealants, binders, emulsifiers, and buffers in pulp and paper as well as detergent industries. The waste glass was also converted to a high-capacity Lithium storage battery to store energy. The Li battery was found to be effective, last long, and is cost-effective [39][30]. When the waste glass was converted to low-cost polymetric tiles for use in the construction industry, it was reported the produced tiles possess improved compressive strength and better load carry capacity [40][31]. Since glass is not biodegradable, recycling is a practical and cost-effective strategy of minimizing glass wastes, reducing pollution and eliminating waste glass from landfills, and avoiding the harmful environmental impacts of waste glass.

32.2.2. Waste Plastic

One of the avenues for waste plastic recycling is the conversion of waste plastic to fuel. Various techniques have been adopted to convert waste plastic to petrol, diesel, jet fuel, and hydrogen fuels. The generated fuels are environmentally friendly, effective, and generate less harmful emissions when used to power internal combustion engines [42,43,44][32][33][34]. In other research, waste plastic has been converted to catalysts for biomass valorization [45][35], nanofoam for environmental remediation [46][36], and oil for engine lubrication applications [47][37].

32.2.3. Waste Tire

Recycled waste tires can be used for road construction, noise and vibration reduction in railways, production of chemicals, biofuel, and other bio-based products [50][38]. These products are achieved through various conversion techniques and technologies including retreading, reclaiming, combustion, grinding, and pyrolysis [53,54][39][40]. Avenues for the utilization of waste tires for various applications have been well exploited and reported by researchers. Some of these applications offer low-cost, environmentally friendly, and waste conversion advantages in road and building construction, energy conversion, wastewater treatment, soil decontamination, and raw materials for the tire industry [55,56,57,58,59,60,61][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].

32.2.4. Wastepaper

Activity in the paper recycling sector has been propelled by numerous environmental, sanitation, and cost benefits derivable from the process. Besides, with the increase in the global literacy index, industrialization, and replacement of most plastic with paper products, the use of books and other paper products will continue to increase. Papers are used in the production of books, magazines, cardboards, stationaries, copying, commercial printing, and packaging. Application of waste papers includes production of bioethanol, butyric acid, cellulose nanofibers, fluorescent Carbon Dots, ceiling boards, and other chemicals and bioproducts [65,66,67,68,69,70,71][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. The conversion of wastepaper into biofuels, building materials, chemicals, and other products are cost-effective, enhance sanitation, ensure appropriate disposal of waste paper, a green approach to waste management, and safeguards the environment.

32.2.5. Waste Metals

There are huge prospects for metal recycling in meeting the dearth of adequate materials for the global industrialization drive. The major process for metal recycling includes collection, separation/sorting, cleaning, fragmentizing, weighing, and selling. The ferrous metals are separated from non-ferrous metals before selling. The collected metals are usually remelted and cast into bigots and sold to industries for further use. Sustainable end-of-life products of metal conversion include construction parts [74][55], automobile parts [75][56], fasteners such as machine screws, socket screws, bolt screws and rivets, bed frames, cooking pots and cutleries, tools, toys, bicycles, sinks and bathtubs, farm equipment, eyeglass frames, beverage containers, roofing and window frames, to mention but a few [76][57]. The numerous environmental, sanitary, and economic advantages of metal recycling make the process continue to receive attention. Recycling waste metals also ensures energy savings and slows landfill growth. However, a lot of time, resources, and energy are expended during the collection, sorting, and conversion of waste metals. Additionally, workers at the various recycling facilities are often exposed to unhealthy environments and toxins. The quality of some of the products of recycled metals is substandard and low in quality leading to failure during usage [77,78,79][58][59][60].

2.2.6. Waste Textiles

It has been estimated that conversion and utilization of waste textiles can reduce the production of new textiles from new materials, improve sanitation, slow down the rate of filling of landfill spaces, and lessen the use of water, energy, and chemicals in the production chain. Compared with incineration and landfilling, textile recycling is more beneficial from the economic, health, social, wastes recovery, and environmental standpoints [89][61]. However, limitations and underdevelopment of the appropriate practical technologies for recycling various types of waste textiles, economic considerations, technical challenges relating to the complexities of clothes, and undeveloped markets have continued to hamper the recycling of waste textiles. Nonetheless, recent studies have enumerated the various avenues and products of textile recycling. According to Xia et al. [90][62], Zach et al. [91][63], Yousef et al. [92][64], and Sauid et al. [93][65], waste textiles are converted into polyethylene terephthalate, thermal and acoustic insulation materials, polyester and carbon electrocatalyst, respectively, for various applications. Recycling waste textiles offers opportunities in material recovery, social, economic, and environmental sustainability.

32.2.7. Wastewater

Various adsorbents have been deployed for the purification of wastewater. Enaime et al. [98][66] developed biochar, whereas Jaspal and Malviya [99][67] developed biomass-based composites as low-cost adsorbents for decontamination of wastewater. Several other effective techniques have been developed and applied for the purification of contaminated water. Dimoglo et al. [100][68], Li et al. [101][69], and Ang and Mohammad [102][70] employed electrocoagulation/electroflotation, oxidation-filtration, and natural coagulants, respectively, for the purification of wastewater. The various techniques were found to be cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable for the removal of colored contaminants, organic and inorganic pollutants from contaminated water. The purified water was found safe, hygienic, and meets international water standards. Decontamination and recycling wastewater contributes to zero wastewater and increases the accessibility of safe water for social, economic, agricultural, commercial, and industrial applications

3. Implications

ZWM is achievable. However, necessary legislations, policies, and programs must be enacted and dutifully implemented. There is need for comprehensive and all-encompassing strategies with specific timelines respected by all stakeholders. The first step towards this is to intensify citizenship education geared towards behavioural change. The people must buy into and wholeheartedly support sustainable consumption. The adverse effects of unmanaged wastes on global climate change and human health are unambiguous and evident. Many people and communities are unwilling to imbibe sustainable behaviour and lifestyles that will mitigate the raging effects of environmental degradation. Governments at various levels must be willing to invest in sensitization, education, training, and research on innovative ways to achieve ZWM [103,104][71][72]. Producers of some non-biodegradable and hazardous products must be made to take some responsibility for the impact of their products on the environment. Producers must develop efficient strategies for product take-back to encourage consumers to return the product to them at its end-of-life. Manufacturers must develop innovative technologies that allow the returned products to be refurbished, remodeled, resuscitated, reprocessed, and made anew. Such encouragements must include monetary rewards and other incentives such as discounts on the purchase of new products. This will promote producers’ and consumers’ responsibility, reduce indiscriminate dumping of used products by consumers, and ensure manufacturers produce products they can recycle [104,105][72][73]. Most countries have weak policies towards waste recycling and material recovery from waste. Enforcement of some of the waste management policies has been politicized in some countries. In the interest of sustenance of the environment, policies and legislations that promote 100% recycling of wastes, 100% recovery of resources from wastes, and zero landfills and incineration should be prioritized [104,106][72][74]. With the advantages of ZW including its cost-saving and economic capabilities, sanitary and environmental sustainability, waste management, material recycling, and resource recovery, it is best to adopt innovative technologies and approaches towards its realization. The use of eco-friendly and innovative technologies will ensure value for money, reduce the risk of infections and contaminations, and allow for metering and adequate record keeping. Some of the techniques and technologies for achieving ZW can be time-consuming, misleading, and difficult to achieve. In some cases, the cost of collection, sorting, and conversion of waste can be greater than the cost of developing new products [107][75]. Additionally, conversion and re-utilization of wastes can offend some social, religious, and cultural beliefs and practices [108][76].

References

  1. Singh, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Hussain, C.M. The realm of zero waste technology: The evolution. In Concepts of Advanced Zero Waste Tools; Hussain, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 1–21.
  2. Zero Waste International Alliance. Available online: https://zwia.org/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  3. Awogbemi, O.; Kallon, D.V.V.; Onuh, E.I.; Aigbodion, V.S. An overview of the classification, production and utilization of biofuels for internal combustion engine applications. Energies 2021, 14, 5687.
  4. Ahuett-Garza, H.; Kurfess, T. A brief discussion on the trends of habilitating technologies for Industry 4.0 and Smart manufacturing. Manuf. Lett. 2018, 15, 60–63.
  5. Frank, A.G.; Dalenogare, L.S.; Ayala, N.F. Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 210, 15–26.
  6. Awogbemi, O.; Kallon, D.V.V. Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on waste biomass conversion techniques. In Proceedings of the SAIIE32 Steps, Muldersdrift, South Africa, 4–6 October 2021; pp. 352–365.
  7. Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10.
  8. Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: A self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput. Netw. 2016, 101, 158–168.
  9. Dolci, R. IoT solutions for precision farming and food manufacturing: ArtificialArtificial intelligence applications in digital food. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Turin, Italy, 4–8 July 2017; Volume 2, pp. 384–385.
  10. Pimenov, D.Y.; Bustillo, A.; Mikolajczyk, T. Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29, 1045–1061.
  11. Ramakrishna, S.; Khong, T.C.; Leong, T.K. Smart manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 12, 128–131.
  12. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R. Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cognit. Robot. 2021, 1, 58–75.
  13. Ji, W.; Wang, L. Industrial robotic machining: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 103, 1239–1255.
  14. Kim, S.H.; Nam, E.; Ha, T.I.; Hwang, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, S.H.; Min, B.K. Robotic machining: A review of recent progress. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2019, 20, 1629–1642.
  15. Ur Rehman, M.H.; Yaqoob, I.; Salah, K.; Imran, M.; Jayaraman, P.P.; Perera, C. The role of big data analytics in industrial Internet of Things. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 99, 247–259.
  16. Ren, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakao, T.; Huisingh, D.; Almeida, C.M.V.B. A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1343–1365.
  17. Askary, Z.; Kumar, R. Cloud Computing in Industries: A Review. In Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering; Kumar, H., Jain, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 107–116.
  18. Wan, C.; Zheng, H.; Guo, L.; Xu, X.; Zhong, R.Y.; Yan, F. Cloud manufacturing in China: A review. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 33, 229–251.
  19. Siderska, J.; Jadaan, K.S. Cloud manufacturing: A service-oriented manufacturing paradigm. A review paper. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2018, 10, 22–31.
  20. Ooi, K.B.; Lee, V.H.; Tan, G.W.H.; Hew, T.S.; Hew, J.J. Cloud computing in manufacturing: The next industrial revolution in Malaysia? Expert Syst. Appl. 2018, 93, 376–394.
  21. Fisher, O.; Watson, N.; Porcu, L.; Bacon, D.; Rigley, M.; Gomes, R.L. Cloud manufacturing as a sustainable process manufacturing route. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 47, 53–68.
  22. Chen, F.; Luo, Z.; Yang, Y.; Liu, G.J.; Ma, J. Enhancing municipal solid waste recycling through reorganizing waste pickers: A case study in Nanjing, China. Waste Manag. Res. 2018, 36, 767–778.
  23. Nodehi, M.; Taghvaee, V.M. Sustainable concrete for circular economy: A review on use of waste glass. Glass Struct. Eng. 2021, 1–20.
  24. Mallum, I.; Sam, A.R.M.; Lim, N.H.A.S.; Omolayo, N. Sustainable Utilization of Waste Glass in Concrete: A Review. Silicon 2021, 1–16.
  25. Johari, A.; Sharma, K. Use of Crushed Waste Glass (CWG) for Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Concrete Production: A Review. In Advances in Geotechnics and Structural Engineering; Kumar-Shukla, S., Raman, S.N., Bhattacharjee, B., Bhattacharjee, J., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2021; Volume 143, pp. 399–410.
  26. Tamanna, N.; Tuladhar, R.; Sivakugan, N. Performance of recycled waste glass sand as partial replacement of sand in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 239, 117804.
  27. Lu, J.X.; Zhou, Y.; He, P.; Wang, S.; Shen, P.; Poon, C.S. Sustainable reuse of waste glass and incinerated sewage sludge ash in insulating building products: Functional and durability assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117635.
  28. Lu, J.X.; Duan, Z.H.; Poon, C.S. Combined use of waste glass powder and cullet in architectural mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 82, 34–44.
  29. Keawthun, M.; Krachodnok, S.; Chaisena, A. Conversion of waste glasses into sodium silicate solutions. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 12, 83–91.
  30. Lee, S.S.; Park, C.M. Facile conversion of waste glass into Li storage materials. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1439–1447.
  31. Rivera, J.F.; Cuarán-Cuarán, Z.I.; Vanegas-Bonilla, N.; Mejía de Gutiérrez, R. Novel use of waste glass powder: Production of geopolymeric tiles. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 3448–3454.
  32. Phanisankar, B.S.S.; Vasudeva Rao, N.; Manikanta, J.E. Conversion of waste plastic to fuel products. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 5190–5195.
  33. Huo, E.; Lei, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, L.; Zhao, Y.; Qian, M.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, X.; Wang, C.; et al. Jet fuel and hydrogen produced from waste plastics catalytic pyrolysis with activated carbon and MgO. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 727, 138411.
  34. Olufemi, A.; Olagboye, S. Thermal conversion of waste plastics into fuel oil. Int. J. Petrochem. Sci. Eng. 2017, 2, 252–257.
  35. Yeung, C.W.S.; Loh, W.W.; Lau, H.H.; Loh, X.J.; Lim, J.Y.C. Catalysts developed from waste plastics: A versatile system for biomass conversion. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 21, 100524.
  36. De Assis, G.C.; Skovroinski, E.B.; Leite, V.D.; Rodrigues, M.O.; Galembeck, A.; Alves, M.C.; Eastoe, J.; De Oliveira, R.J. Conversion of “Waste Plastic” into photocatalytic nanofoams for environmental remediation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 8077–8085.
  37. Ahmad, N.; Maafa, I.M.; Ahmed, U.; Akhter, P.; Shehzad, N.; Amjad, U.; Hussain, M. Thermal conversion of polystyrene plastic waste to liquid fuel via ethanolysis. Fuel 2020, 279, 118498.
  38. Martínez, J.D. An overview of the end-of-life tires status in some Latin American countries: Proposing pyrolysis for a circular economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 144, 111032.
  39. Sathiskumar, C.; Karthikeyan, S. Recycling of waste tires and its energy storage application of by-products—A review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2019, 22, e00125.
  40. Formela, K. Sustainable development of waste tires recycling technologies—Recent advances, challenges and future trends. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2021, 4, 209–222.
  41. Karthikeyan, S.; Prathima, A.; Periyasamy, M.; Mahendran, G. Assessment of the use of Codium Decorticafum biodiesel and pyrolytic waste tires oil blends in CI engine. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 4224–4227.
  42. Bockstal, L.; Berchem, T.; Schmetz, Q.; Richel, A. Devulcanisation and reclaiming of tires and rubber by physical and chemical processes: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117574.
  43. Subramanian, A.S.; Gundersen, T.; Adams, T.A., II. Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system. Energy 2020, 205, 117830.
  44. Shahrokhi-Shahraki, R.; Kwon, P.S.; Park, J.; O’Kelly, B.C.; Rezania, S. BTEX and heavy metals removal using pulverized waste tires in engineered fill materials. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125281.
  45. Chen, C.; Sun, M.; Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Jiang, Z. Recent Advances on Drawing Technology of Ultra-Fine Steel Tire Cord and Steel Saw Wire. Metals 2021, 11, 1590.
  46. Gómez-Hernández, R.; Panecatl-Bernal, Y.; Méndez-Rojas, M.A. High yield and simple one-step production of carbon black nanoparticles from waste tires. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02139.
  47. Svoboda, J.; Vaclavik, V.; Dvorsky, T.; Klus, L.; Zajac, R. The potential utilization of the rubber material after waste tire recycling. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 385, 012057.
  48. Al-Azkawi, A.; Elliston, A.; Al-Bahry, S.; Sivakumar, N. Waste paper to bioethanol: Current and future prospective. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefin. 2019, 13, 1106–1118.
  49. Hietala, M.; Varrio, K.; Berglund, L.; Soini, J.; Oksman, K. Potential of municipal solid waste paper as raw material for production of cellulose nanofibers. Waste Manag. 2018, 80, 319–326.
  50. Joshi, G.; Naithani, S.; Varshney, V.K.; Bisht, S.S.; Rana, V.; Gupta, P.K. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose from office waste paper: A greener approach towards waste management. Waste Manag. 2015, 38, 33–40.
  51. Adolfsson, K.H.; Hassanzadeh, S.; Hakkarainen, M. Valorization of cellulose and waste paper to graphene oxide quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 26550–26558.
  52. Liu, J.; Wang, X. A new method to prepare oil adsorbent utilizing waste paper and its application for oil spill clean-ups. BioResources 2019, 14, 3886–3898.
  53. Huang, J.; Dai, H.; Yan, R.; Wang, P. Butyric acid production from recycled waste paper by immobilized Clostridium tyrobutyricum in a fibrous-bed bioreactor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 1048–1054.
  54. Ekpunobi, U.; Ohaekenyem, E.; Ogbuagu, A.; Orjiako, E. The mechanical properties of ceiling board produced from waste paper. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 166.
  55. Chiba, R.; Yoshimura, M. Solid-state recycling of aluminium alloy swarf into c-channel by hot extrusion. J. Manuf. Process 2015, 17, 1–8.
  56. Vijayan, V.; Parthiban, A.; Sathish, T.; Sankar, L.P.; Kumar, S.D.; Saravanakumar, S.; Tafesse, D. Optimization of reinforced aluminum scraps from the automobile bumpers with nickel and magnesium Oxide in stir casting. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1–10.
  57. Pacelli, F.; Ostuzzi, F.; Levi, M. Reducing and reusing industrial scraps: A proposed method for industrial designers. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 78–87.
  58. Zheng, X.; Zhu, Z.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Cao, H.; Sun, Z. A Mini-Review on Metal Recycling from Spent Lithium Ion Batteries. Engineering 2018, 4, 361–370.
  59. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Priyanka, B.; Senthil Kumar, P.; Karishma, S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Indraganti, S. A review on recent advancements in recovery of valuable and toxic metals from e-waste using bioleaching approach. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132230.
  60. Li, L.; Liu, G.; Pan, D.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Zuo, T. Overview of the recycling technology for copper-containing cables. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 126, 132–140.
  61. Sandin, G.; Peters, G.M. Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 353–365.
  62. Xia, G.; Han, W.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Kong, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Jia, F. Complete recycling and valorization of waste textiles for value-added transparent films via an ionic liquid. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106182.
  63. Zach, J.; Hroudová, J.; Korjenic, A. Environmentally efficient thermal and acoustic insulation based on natural and waste fibers. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 2156–2161.
  64. Yousef, S.; Tatariants, M.; Tichonovas, M.; Kliucininkas, L.; Lukošiūtė, S.I.; Yan, L. Sustainable green technology for recovery of cotton fibers and polyester from textile waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120078.
  65. Sauid, S.M.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Karim, N.A.; Shyuan, L.K. Superior stability and methanol tolerance of a metal-free nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon electrocatalyst derived from textile waste. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 1834–1846.
  66. Enaime, G.; Baçaoui, A.; Yaacoubi, A.; Lübken, M. Biochar for wastewater treatment—Conversion technologies and applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3492.
  67. Jaspal, D.; Malviya, A. Composites for wastewater purification: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125788.
  68. Dimoglo, A.; Sevim-Elibol, P.; Dinç, Ö.; Gökmen, K.; Erdoğan, H. Electrocoagulation/electroflotation as a combined process for the laundry wastewater purification and reuse. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100877.
  69. Li, N.; Lu, X.; He, M.; Duan, X.; Yan, B.; Chen, G.; Wang, S. Catalytic membrane-based oxidation-filtration systems for organic wastewater purification: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125478.
  70. Ang, W.L.; Mohammad, A.W. State of the art and sustainability of natural coagulants in water and wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121267.
  71. Zaman, A. Zero-Waste: A New Sustainability Paradigm for Addressing the Global Waste Problem. In The Vision Zero Handbook: Theory, Technology and Management for a Zero Casualty Policy; Björnberg, K.E., Matts-Åke, B., Hansson, S.O., Tingvall, C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–24.
  72. Zaman, A.U.; Lehmann, S. Challenges and opportunities in transforming a city into a “zero waste city”. Challenges 2011, 2, 73–93.
  73. Gaur, A.; Gurjar, S.K.; Chaudhary, S. Circular system of resource recovery and reverse logistics approach: Key to zero waste and zero landfill. In Advanced Organic Waste Management; Hussain, C., Hait, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 365–381.
  74. Zhao, R.; Sun, L.; Zou, X.; Fujii, M.; Dong, L.; Dou, Y.; Geng, Y.; Wang, F. Towards a Zero Waste city- an analysis from the perspective of energy recovery and landfill reduction in Beijing. Energy 2021, 223, 120055.
  75. Demets, R.; Roosen, M.; Vandermeersch, L.; Ragaert, K.; Walgraeve, C.; De Meester, S. Development and application of an analytical method to quantify odour removal in plastic waste recycling processes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 161, 104907.
  76. Lee, R.P.; Meyer, B.; Huang, Q.; Voss, R. Sustainable waste management for zero waste cities in China: Potential, challenges and opportunities. Clean Energy 2020, 4, 169–201.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback