Post-Operative Endodontic Pain Management: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Peter Tang and Version 1 by Federica Di Spirito.

Endodontic treatment comprises the overall management of pre-, intra- and post-operative symptoms, including post-operative endodontic pain, considered as a complication susceptible of chronicization. Post-operative pain is very common and highly unpreventable and has a multi-factorial etiology and a potential pathogenic link to the acute inflammation of the periapical area, secondary to localized chemical, mechanical, host and/or microbial damage occurring during endodontic treatment. 

  • endodontics
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • pain
  • root canal treatment
  • steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

1. Introduction

The majority of the patients visit the dental office because of more or less intense pain, mainly attributable to endodontic and periodontal causes, and most of all recognizing an endodontic origin; thus, it is essential for the clinicians to differentiate odontogenic from non-odontogenic pain [1]. Accordingly, endodontic pain management primarily depends on an accurate diagnosis of pain origin, aided by clinical exam and periapical and pulp tests, along with 2D and 3D radiographic examination [1,2][1][2].
Endodontic treatment comprises the overall management of pre-, intra- and post-operative symptoms, including post-operative endodontic pain, which is considered as a treatment complication susceptible of chronicization [3] and which represents patients’ significant concern [4].
Post-operative pain is very common, affecting from 2.5% to almost 60% of subjects that have undergone endodontic treatments [5], and it shows a tendency to increase between 6 and 12 h after treatment, reaching a prevalence of about 40% in 24 h and falling to 11% one week after treatment [3,6][3][6]. Moreover, post-operative endodontic pain is highly unpreventable, being affected by a variety of factors related to the subject (such as age and gender), to the treated tooth (including the pre-operative pulp status and type of tooth) and to the treatment performed (either primary root canal therapy or retreatment) [6].
Given that post-operative endodontic pain has a multi-factorial etiology and a potential pathogenic link to the acute inflammation of the periapical area, secondary to localized chemical, mechanical, host and/or microbial damage occurring during endodontic treatment [3,4,5,6][3][4][5][6], several strategies have been proposed to control post-operative endodontic pain, comprising technical features and solutions to be observed when performing endodontic treatment [5[5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30],7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], along with occlusal reduction [31[31][32][33],32,33], as well as adjunctive therapies, such as lower-laser therapy [34[34][35],35], cryotherapy [36[36][37][38],37,38], phototherapy [39], topical medicaments administration and systemic drug therapy [6,40,41][6][40][41].

2. Oral Medications Post-Operatively Administered to Control Post-Operative Endodontic Pain

Previous systematic reviews have mostly analyzed single classes of oral medicaments, including steroidal (SAIDs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as opioid analgesics, not comparing one another and, thus, failing to provide conclusive results on the superiority of one over another approach. In addition, specific data regarding indications, timing and dosage of the post-operative endodontic oral medications prescription were often not clearly presented, thus not providing clinically relevant recommendations. Moreover, several reviews also evaluated antibiotics and pre-medications to control post-operative endodontic pain, which were both excluded from the present overview of systematic reviews of systematic reviewsesearch, because they contrasted with antibiotic stewardship standards proposed both by the American Dental Association [63][42] and the American Association of Endodontists [64][43] and with the attempt of avoiding polypharmacy [64][43], respectively, and they should, therefore, be considered not clinically advisable. Systematic reviews reporting findings from subjects with cancer, osteonecrosis of the jaws or other systemic disorders possibly affecting pain perception or the efficacy of the investigated oral medications [65,66,67,68][44][45][46][47] were also not considered in the attempt to obtain generalizable data. No data were retrieved differentiating vital from non-vital teeth, non-surgical initial endodontic treatment from retreatment and sessions number, neither in terms of post-operative endodontic pain incidence and severity nor management; thus, no specific recommendations could be formulated concerning pre-operative pulp conditions, the type of non-surgical endodontic treatment and single- vs. multiple-sessions procedures. However, with regard to the type and dosage of post-operatively administered medications, steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were shown to be effective in reducing pain intensity in the first 24 h after a primary root canal treatment. SAIDs’ analgesic efficacy was shown to be potentially influenced by the type and dose of the drug; no significant difference was nonetheless reported between dexamethasone (4 mg) and betamethasone (2 mg) [31]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common oral medicaments post-operatively administered to control pain, with ibuprofen being the most prescribed and investigated. Ibuprofen (600 mg) alone and ibuprofen (600 mg) combined with acetaminophen (1000 mg) were reported to be significantly more effective in post-operative endodontic pain control when administered 6 h after endodontic treatment and may be, therefore, recommended as a first-choice treatment in the first hours following non-surgical endodontic treatment. In addition, emerging data support the evidence that ketoprofen (50 mg) as well as naproxen (500 mg) might be even more effective than ibuprofen (600 mg) alone 6 h post-operatively [47][48]. However, only low to moderate evidence supports such a recommendation [48][49]. Moreover, multiple-dose regimens seemed to be more effective in pain control compared to single-dose, although no definite protocols were proposed [45][50]. To the researchers’ knowledge, this research was the first summarizing findings from systematic reviews of RCTs on different classes of oral drugs prescribed to control post-operative endodontic pain all together. In addition, the presented overview of systematic reviews of systematic reviews esearch did not consider either pre-operatively administered oral medications or combined antibiotic prescriptions in the attempt to highlight the shorter therapy duration, thus excluding pre-medications, and to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatment to control post-operative endodontic pain. Moreover, the researchers aimed to identify the most effective type and dosage of post-operatively administered medications, not only limiting, at the most, therapy duration and complying with accepted standards for antibiotic stewardship, but also taking into account polypharmacy, which is especially relevant for patients’ comorbidity and specific conditions [48,69,70,71,72,73,74][49][51][52][53][54][55][56]. In such a perspective, the correct pharmacological strategy should also reduce patients’ concerns, on the one side, and optimize practitioners’ time and efforts, on the other side, thus decreasing endodontic complications and emergencies, which may potentially require additional operative sessions, which should be even more avoided in the ongoing context of COVID-19 [75,76,77,78,79][57][58][59][60][61].

3. Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations for Post-Operative Endodontic Pain Management

Pain following endodontic treatment may be secondary to anatomical factors, such as apical foramen position, pulp tissue localization in areas where it cannot be removed without proper care and root canals that can be omitted without instrumentation, as well as to technical factors affecting or occurring during the procedure, such as an inaccurate determination of the working length. The last could, in turn, lead to excessive instrumentation, with extrusion of root canal debris beyond the apical foramen during instrumentation, an extension of the filling beyond the apex and an incorrect use of irrigants, specifically sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide, potentially causing iatrogenic periapical discomfort [50,51][62][63]. Mechanical and chemical damages to the periapical tissues would also determine an inflammatory reaction that causes pain. The severity of the pain has been reported to be dependent on several aspects, including the intensity of the injury, the intensity of the tissue damage and the inflammatory response’s intensity. The mechanical irritation that causes periapical inflammation includes over-instrumentation, irritants and drugs over the apical foramen and excessively extensive filling materials. Furthermore, the greater the amount of overextended material, the greater is the intensity of damage to the periapical tissues [62][64]. Pain after root canal treatment is a serious health problem that affects the quality of life in the short term and, sometimes, even in the long term. Root canal treatment is generally very effective in relieving tooth pain [50,52,53][62][65][66] when correctly performed. However, it has been reported that one in five patients, on average, receiving root canal treatment will experience a serious disturbance in their daily life due to post-operative endodontic pain [50][62] and that up to 10% of patients may refer to persistent pain until six months after endodontic treatment [51][63]. Indeed, endodontic therapy does not rely on biological consequences solely, but also on minimizing patient discomfort. The success of endodontic treatments is based on eliminating microbes from the root canal and on creating a local environment favoring healing, by performing appropriate shaping, 3D cleaning and, finally, a 3D obturation [5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,54,55][5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][67][68]. Silva et al. compared rotary instruments with hand files and concluded that a lower incidence of post-operative pain was recorded when rotary systems were employed [56][69]. Furthermore, these authors highlighted that rotary systems may reduce the overall risk of complications throughout the procedure, favoring both less debris formation and bacteria extrusion [56][69]. Based on the evidence, no significant differences in post-operative endodontic pain incidence, severity or control capability were reported for a single session when compared to multiple sessions endodontics [57,58][70][71]. However, numerous studies have also reported inter-appointment pain, putatively secondary to the imbalance in the host–bacteria relationship, induced by intra-canal procedures [5]. In such particular circumstances, pain may be due to the pathogenic effect of specific bacteria, such as Porphyromonas Endodontalis, Porphyromonas Gingivalis and Prevotella species, as proposed by various studies [59[72][73][74],60,61], or it may be linked to an individual’s host resistance [60][73]; it has been hypothesized that subjects who have a lesser ability to cope with infections may be more prone to develop clinical symptoms after endodontic procedures in infected root canals. Calcium hydroxide is considered an optimum root canal medication against microbes in multiple sessions treatments; such intra-canal medicaments have been found to be able to reduce the periapical infection, both decreasing the total count of those microbes present in the root canals and retarding the growth of new pathogens [49][75]. In addition to intracanal medications, several methods have been proposed to control pain occurring during endodontic treatment and resulting from inter-appointment exacerbations, comprising re-instrumentation, chirurgical incision, abscess drainage, occlusal reduction and systemically delivered medications [62][64]. Given that post-operative pain is very common and highly unpreventable [47][48], patients should always be advised that pain may be felt after the procedure, and considering the multi-factorial etio-pathogenesis of post-operative endodontic pain, practitioners should always steer clear of iatrogenic injury. Indeed, dentists should respect the working length during shaping, cleaning and obturation, both during root canal treatment and retreatment, accomplishing a correct access cavity to find all the root canals, using a crown down technique and respecting the apical third, avoiding debris, irrigants, gutta-percha and sealer extrusion over the apex and, finally, performing a correct obturation.


  1. Rosenberg, P.A. Clinical strategies for managing endodontic pain. Endod. Top. 2002, 3, 78–92.
  2. Guevara Perez, S.V.; de la Rosa Castolo, G.; Thollon, L.; Behr, M. A 3D characterization method of geometric variation in edentulous mandibles. Morphologie 2018, 102, 255–262.
  3. Iqbal, A. The Factors Responsible for Endodontic Treatment Failure in the Permanent Dentitions of the Patients Reported to the College of Dentistry, the University of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, 146–148.
  4. Gotler, M.; Bar-Gil, B.; Ashkenazi, M. Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Dent. 2012, 2012, 310467.
  5. Sathorn, C.; Parashos, P.; Messer, H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: A systematic review. Int. Endod. J. 2008, 41, 91–99.
  6. Iranmanesh, F.; Parirokh, M.; Haghdoost, A.A.; Abbott, P.V. Effect of Corticosteroids on Pain Relief Following Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review. Iran. Endod. J. 2017, 12, 123–130.
  7. Amato, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Abtellatif, D.; Blasi, A.; Gagliani, M.; Iandolo, A. An in vitro evaluation of the degree of pulp tissue dissolution through different root canal irrigation protocols. J. Conserv. Dent. 2018, 21, 175–179.
  8. Iandolo, A.; Abdellatif, D.; Amato, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Blasi, A.; Franco, V.; Mds, P.N. Dentinal tubule penetration and root canal cleanliness following ultrasonic activation of intracanal-heated sodium hypochlorite. Aust. Endod. J. 2020, 46, 204–209.
  9. Iandolo, A.; Amato, M.; Dagna, A.; Poggio, C.; Abdellatif, D.; Franco, V.; Pantaleo, G. Intracanal heating of sodium hypochlorite: Scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal walls. J. Conserv. Dent. 2018, 21, 569–573.
  10. Iandolo, A.; Pantaleo, G.; Malvano, M.; Simeone, M.; Amato, M. Nonsurgical management of complex endodontic cases with several periapical lesions: A case series. G. Ital. Endod. 2016, 30, 101–103.
  11. Iandolo, A.; Simeone, M.; Riccitiello, F. The preparation of coronal isthmus is a fundamental step for long term success. G. Ital. Endod. 2012, 26, 150–154.
  12. Iandolo, A.; Dagna, A.; Poggio, C.; Capar, I.; Amato, A.; Abdellatif, D. Evaluation of the actual chlorine concentration and the required time for pulp dissolution using different sodium hypochlorite irrigating solutions. J. Conserv. Dent. 2019, 22, 108–113.
  13. Iandolo, A.; Ametrano, G.; Amato, M.; Rengo, S.; Simeone, M. IG-File: A novel tool to improve root canal cleaning and measurement of the apical foramen. G. Ital. Endod. 2011, 25, 72–81.
  14. Di Lorenzo, P.; Niola, M.; Buccelli, C.; Re, D.; Cortese, A.; Pantaleo, G.; Amato, M. Professional responsability in dentistry: Analysis of an interdepartmental case study. Dent. Cadmos 2015, 83, 324–3405.
  15. Amato, M.; Iandolo, A.; Pantaleo, G.; Abtellatif, D.; Simeone, M.; Lizio, A.; Giudice, R.L.; Giudice, G.L. The IG- file use to Gauge the Apical Diameter in Endodontics: An In Vitro Study. Open Dent. J. 2018, 12, 638–646.
  16. Iandolo, A.; Simeone, M.; Orefice, S.; Rengo, S. 3D cleaning, a perfected technique: Thermal profile assessment of heated NaOCl. G. Ital. Endod. 2017, 31, 58–61.
  17. Iandolo, A.; Abdellatif, D.; Pantaleo, G.; Sammartino, P.; Amato, A. Conservative shaping combined with three-dimensional cleaning can be a powerful tool: Case series. J. Conserv. Dent. 2020, 23, 648–652.
  18. Rengo, C.; Spagnuolo, G.; Ametrano, G.; Goracci, C.; Nappo, A.; Rengo, S.; Ferrari, M. Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in Class II restorations: A microCT and digital microscope analysis. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015, 60, 123–129.
  19. Iandolo, A.; Amato, A.; Martina, S.; Abdellatif, D.; Pantaleo, G. Management of severe curvatures in root canal treatment with the new generation of rotating files using a safe and predictable protocol. Open Dent. J. 2020, 14, 421–425.
  20. Amato, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Abdellatif, D.; Blasi, A.; Lo Giudice, R.; Iandolo, A. Evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of modern Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments with continuous rotation. G. Ital. Endod. 2017, 31, 78–82.
  21. Iandolo, A.; Abdellatif, D.; Barbosa, A.F.A.; Scelza, G.; Gasparro, R.; Sammartino, P.; Silva, E.J.N.L. Confocal laser scanning microscopy evaluation of roots subjected to activation protocol in endodontic microsurgery. Aust. Endod. J. 2021.
  22. RahbaniNobar, B.; Dianat, O.; RahbaniNobar, B.; Shirvani, A.; Zargar, N.; Kazem, M.; Tordik, P. Effect of Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation Motions on Postoperative Pain Incidence in Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Endod. J. 2021, 6, 3–14.
  23. Susila, A.; Minu, J. Activated Irrigation vs. Conventional non-activated Irrigation in Endodontics—A Systematic Review. Eur. Endod. J. 2019, 4, 96–110.
  24. Martins, C.M.; da Silva Machado, N.E.; Giopatto, B.V.; de Souza Batista, V.E.; Marsicano, J.A.; Mori, G.G. Post-operative pain after using sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine as irrigation solutions in endodontics: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2020, 31, 774–781.
  25. Anjaneyulu, K.; Nivedhitha, M.S. Influence of calcium hydroxide on the post-treatment pain in Endodontics: A systematic review. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014, 17, 200–207.
  26. Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Tan, M.; Hu, B.; Gao, X.; Song, J. Pain after root canal treatment with different instruments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis. 2018, 24, 908–919.
  27. Yaylali, I.E.; Demirci, G.K.; Kurnaz, S.; Celik, G.; Kaya, B.U.; Tunca, Y.M. Does Maintaining Apical Patency during Instrumentation Increase Postoperative Pain or Flare-up Rate after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 1228–1236.
  28. Nunes, G.P.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Gomes, J.M.L.; Lemos, C.A.A.; Pellizzer, E.P. Postoperative pain in endodontic retreatment of one visit versus multiple visits: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 455–468.
  29. Ibrahim, A.M.; Zakhary, S.Y.; Amin, S.A.W. Calcium hydroxide intracanal medication effects on pain and flare-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2020, 45, e26.
  30. Martins, C.M.; De Souza Batista, V.E.; Andolfatto Souza, A.C.; Andrada, A.C.; Mori, G.G.; Gomes Filho, J.E. Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. J. Conserv. Dent. 2019, 22, 320–331.
  31. Shamszadeh, S.; Shirvani, A.; Asgary, S. Does occlusal reduction reduce post-operative endodontic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47, 528–535.
  32. Chagas Carvalho Alves, N.; RaianeMamede Veloso, S.; de Andrade Silva, S.; de Almeida, A.C.; Tavares VelozoTelles, C.; Romeiro, K.; Monteiro, G.Q.D.M.; de Albuquerque, D.S. Influence of occlusal reduction on pain after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14019.
  33. Lauritano, D.; Moreo, G.; Carinci, F.; Della Vella, F.; Di Spirito, F.; Sbordone, L.; Petruzzi, M. Cleaning efficacy of the XP-Endo® Finisher instrument compared to other irrigation activation procedures: A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5001.
  34. Chen, Y.; Chen, X.L.; Zou, X.L.; Chen, S.Z.; Zou, J.; Wang, Y. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in pain management after root canal treatment or retreatment: A systematic review. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 1305–1316.
  35. Guerreiro, M.Y.R.; Monteiro, L.P.B.; de Castro, R.F.; Magno, M.B.; Maia, L.C.; da Silva Brandão, J.M. Effect of low-level laser therapy on postoperative endodontic pain: An updated systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 57, 102638.
  36. Gupta, A.; Aggarwal, V.; Gurawa, A.; Mehta, N.; Abraham, D.; Singh, A.; Jala, S.; Chauhan, N. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on postendodontic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2021, 21, 15–27.
  37. Sadaf, D.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Onakpoya, I.J. Effectiveness of Intracanal Cryotherapy in Root Canal Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J. Endod. 2020, 46, 1811–1823.
  38. Monteiro, L.P.B.; Guerreiro, M.Y.R.; de Castro Valino, R.; Magno, M.B.; Maia, L.C.; da Silva Brandão, J.M. Effect of intracanal cryotherapy application on postoperative endodontic pain: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 23–35.
  39. Alonaizan, F.A.; AlFawaz, Y.F. Is phototherapy effective in the management of post-operative endodontic pain? A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 26, 53–58.
  40. Nagendrababu, V.; Gutmann, J.L. Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2017, 48, 193–208.
  41. AlRahabi, M.K. Predictors, prevention, and management of postoperative pain associated with nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review. J. Taibah. Univ. Med. Sci. 2017, 12, 376–384.
  42. Lockhart, P.B.; Tampi, M.P.; Abt, E.; Aminoshariae, A.; Durkin, M.J.; Fouad, A.F.; Gopal, P.; Hatten, B.W.; Kennedy, E.; Lang, M.S.; et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on antibiotic use for the urgent management of pulpal- and periapical-related dental pain and intraoral swelling: A report from the American Dental Association. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2019, 150, 906–921.
  43. Fouad, A.F.; Byrne, B.E.; Diogenes, A.R.; Sedgley, C.M.; Cha, B.Y. AAE Guidance on the Use of Systemic Antibiotics in Endodontics, AAE Position Statement. 2017. Available online: (accessed on 29 September 2021).
  44. Varghese, D.; Ishida, C.; HaseerKoya, H. Polypharmacy. In StatPearls ; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021.
  45. Huang, Y.F.; Muo, C.H.; Tsai, C.H.; Liu, S.P.; Chang, C.T. The association with xerostomia from sialadenitis and the jaw osteonecrosis in head and neck cancer population: A nationwide cohort study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 585–593.
  46. Lungu, A.E.; Lazar, M.A.; Tonea, A.; Rotaru, H.; Roman, R.C.; Badea, M.E. Observational study of the bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of jaws. Clujul. Med. 2018, 91, 209–215.
  47. Di Spirito, F.; Argentino, S.; Martuscelli, R.; Sbordone, L. MRONJ incidence after multiple teeth extractions in patients taking oral bisphosphonates without “drug holiday”: A retrospective chart review. Oral Implantol. 2019, 12, 105–110.
  48. Smith, E.A.; Marshall, J.G.; Selph, S.S.; Barker, D.R.; Sedgley, C.M. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Managing Postoperative Endodontic Pain in Patients Who Present with Preoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 7–15.
  49. Zanjir, M.; Sgro, A.; Lighvan, N.L.; Yarascavitch, C.; Shah, P.S.; da Costa, B.R.; Azarpazhooh, A. Efficacy and Safety of Postoperative Medications in Reducing Pain after Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J. Endod. 2020, 46, 1387–1402.e4.
  50. Santini, M.; Da Rosa, R.A.; Ferreira, M.B.; Barletta, F.; Longo do Nascimento, A.; Weissheimer, T.; Estrela, C.; So, M.V. Medications Used for Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Endodontic Pain: A Systematic Review. Eur. Endod. J. 2021, 6, 15–24.
  51. He, X.; Tian, Y.; Guo, L.; Ano, T.; Lux, R.; Zusman, D.R.; Shi, W. In vitro communities derived from oral and gut microbial floras inhibit the growth of bacteria of foreign origins. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 60, 665–676.
  52. Guerrini, L.; Monaco, A.; Pietropaoli, D.; Ortu, E.; Giannoni, M.; Marci, M.C. Antibiotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Literature and Guidelines Considering Antibiotic Resistance. Open Dent. J. 2019, 13, 383–398.
  53. Barone, A.; Chatelain, S.; Derchi, G.; Di Spirito, F.; Martuscelli, R.; Porzio, M.; Sbordone, L. Effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing alveolitis after erupted tooth extraction: A retrospective study. Oral Dis. 2020, 26, 967–973.
  54. Iannelli, A.; Favre, G.; Frey, S.; Esnault, V.; Gugenheim, J.; Bouam, S.; Schiavo, L.; Tran, A.; Alifano, M. Obesity and COVID-19: ACE 2, the Missing Tile. Obes. Surg. 2020, 30, 4615–4617.
  55. Kim, K.; Choi, S.; Chang, J.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, R.J.; Cho, H.-J.; Park, S.M. Severity of dental caries and risk of coronary heart disease in middle-aged men and women: A population-based cohort study of Korean adults, 2002–2013. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10491.
  56. Zannella, C.; Shinde, S.; Vitiello, M.; Falanga, A.; Galdiero, E.; Fahmi, A. Antibacterial activity of indolicidin-coated silver nanoparticles in oral disease. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1837.
  57. Azim, A.A.; Shabbir, J.; Khurshid, Z.; Zafar, M.S.; Ghabbani, H.M.; Dummer, P.M.H. Clinical endodontic management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review and clinical recommendations. Int. Endod. J. 2020, 53, 1461–1471.
  58. Nosrat, A.; Dianat, O.; Verma, P.; Yu, P.; Wu, D.; Fouad, A.F. Endodontics specialists’ practice during the initial outbreak of COVID-19. J. Endod. 2021, 48, 102–108.
  59. Martina, S.; Amato, A.; Rongo, R.; Caggiano, M.; Amato, M. The Perception of COVID-19 among Italian Dentists: An Orthodontic Point of View. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4384.
  60. Marinaci, T.; Carpinelli, L.; Venuleo, C.; Savarese, G.; Cavallo, P. Emotional distress, psychosomatic symptoms and their relationship with institutional responses: A survey of Italian frontline medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05766.
  61. Gasparro, R.; Scandurra, C.; Maldonato, N.M.; Dolce, P.; Bochicchio, V.; Valletta, A. Perceived job insecurity and depressive symptoms among italian dentists: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1–12.
  62. Law, A.S.; Nixdorf, D.R.; Aguirre, A.M.; Reams, G.J.; Tortomasi, A.J.; Manne, B.D.; Harris, D. Predicting severe pain after root canal therapy in the National Dental PBRN. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 37–43.
  63. Nixdorf, D.R.; Law, A.S.; Lindquist, K.; Reams, G.J.; Cole, E.; Kanter, K.; Nguyen, R.H.; Harris, D.R. Frequency, impact, and predictors of persistent pain after root canal treatment: A national dental PBRN study. Pain 2016, 157, 159–165.
  64. Jayakodi, H.; Kailasam, S.; Kumaravadivel, K.; Thangavelu, B.; Mathew, S. Clinical and pharmacological management of endodontic flare-up. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2012, 4, 294–298.
  65. Law, A.S.; Nixdorf, D.R.; Rabinowitz, I.; Reams, G.J.; Smith, J.A., Jr.; Torres, A.V.; Harris, D.R. Root canal therapy reduces multiple dimensions of pain: A national dental practice-based research network study. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1738–1745.
  66. Pak, J.G.; White, S.N. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: A systematic review. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 429–438.
  67. Uzunoglu-Özyürek, E.; KüçükkayaEren, S.; Karahan, S. Effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018, 22, 2475–2485.
  68. Iandolo, A.; Iandolo, G.; Malvano, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Simeone, M. Modern Technologies in Endodontics. G. Ital. Endod. 2016, 30, 2–9.
  69. Silva, E.J.; Carapiá, M.F.; Lopes, R.M.; Belladonna, F.G.; Senna, P.M.; Souza, E.M.; De-Deus, G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 700–705.
  70. Wong, A.W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, C.F.; Chu, C.H. Perceptions of single-visit and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: A survey of endodontic specialists and general dentists in Hong Kong. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2016, 7, 263–271.
  71. Fleming, C.H.; Litaker, M.S.; Alley, L.W.; Eleazer, P.D. Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 414–418.
  72. Siqueira, J.F., Jr.; Rôças, I.N.; Souto, R.; Uzeda, M.; Colombo, A.P. Microbiological evaluation of acute periradicular abscesses by DNA-DNA hybridization. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2001, 92, 451–457.
  73. Rôças, I.N.; Siqueira, J.F., Jr.; Andrade, A.F.; Uzeda, M. Oral treponemes in primary root canal infections as detected by nested PCR. Int. Endod. J. 2003, 36, 20–26.
  74. Jacinto, R.C.; Gomes, B.P.; Ferraz, C.C.; Zaia, A.A.; Filho, F.J. Microbiological analysis of infected root canals from symptomatic and asymptomatic teeth with periapical periodontitis and the antimicrobial susceptibility of some isolated anaerobic bacteria. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 18, 285–292.
  75. Wong, A.W.; Zhang, C.; Chu, C.H. A systematic review of nonsurgical single-visit versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2014, 6, 45–56.