Childhood Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Obesity: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Chao Huang and Version 4 by Amina Yu.

Obesity has become a worldwide epidemic; 340 million of children and adolescents were overweight or obese in 2016, and this number continues to grow at a rapid rate. Epidemiological research has suggested that air pollution affects childhood obesity and weight status, but the evidence remains inconsistent. 儿童期肥胖与肥胖有关,成年后患慢性病的风险增加,这些不良反应可能持续一生。我们的研究发现,空气污染可以被视为儿童和青少年体重增加的可能危险因素。

  • childhood
  • air pollution
  • obesity
  • BMI

1. Introduction

Obesity has become a worldwide epidemic and urgent health issue [1]. The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased considerably in the last few decades and nearly tripled since 1975. With regard to children and adolescents, 340 million of them were overweight or obese in 2016, and this number continues to grow at a rapid rate [2][3]. Childhood obesity has been associated with obesity and increased risks for chronic disease in adulthood [4][5], and these adverse effects may last the whole lifetime [6]. Research has identified multiple factors that can lead to childhood obesity and it has been shown that childhood obesity can be attributed to genetic, dietary, and behavioral factors [7]. Despite genetic and metabolic predispositions, the rising epidemic of obesity indicates environmental factors may play a role in accelerating the progression of childhood obesity [8].
The Global Burden of Disease study revealed that air pollution can be the most adverse environmental health hazard for disease and mortality worldwide [9][10]. Well over 80% of urban dwellers suffer from air pollution, and the most seriously affected individuals were low-income residents [11]. In recent years, mounting evidence suggests that air pollution can be an obesogenic factor [12]. It is mainly through the biochemical and behavioral pathways that air pollution affects body weight. Metabolic disorders [13], inflammatory reactions [14], reduced sleep duration and quality [15] that are caused by air pollution all contribute to the accumulation of adipose tissue and weight gain, as has been demonstrated in animal trials. Additionally, the decline in air quality reduces a person’s willingness to engage in outdoor activities [16], which in turn increases indoor time, in order to reduce the impact of pollution on the human body [17].
Although there are numerous focus on air pollution and obesity, the effects remained inconsistent and differed among the populations, pollutant types, and pollutant concentrations [12]. It was found that previous ones were more concentrated on exposure during pregnancy [18][19], whereas recent one have increasingly examined the direct effects of children’s exposure to air pollution on obesity [20][21]. However, the findings seem to be inconsistent even in children and adolescents only [22][23][24]. For instance, Fioravanti et al. suggested that the evidence that air pollution causes obesity was limited [23]. In contrast, some indicated that long-term exposure to air pollutants might be correlated with weight gain and the development of obesity [20][21][25][26]. Among the available information, the existing ones have been mostly concentrated on adults or whole populations, and quantitative synthesis of the contribution of air pollution to children and adolescents remains scarce [12][27][28]. A meta-analysis by Parasin et al. examined the relationship between air pollution and childhood obesity, but did not distinguish between exposure during pregnancy and individual exposure, and also did not standardize when combining the effects of pollutants across these [29]. Therefore, it was believe that the topic still has potential for further research. As such, it was to systematically and quantitatively analyze the scientific evidence on the influence of exposure to air pollution on weight gain and obesity in childhood.

2. The Association between Childhood Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Obesity

It was showed that long-term exposure to particulate matter and NO2 was significantly correlated with the risk of childhood obesity, while BMI also showed similar elevated results. Although O3 and NOx also had a positive effect on the increase in weight status, none reached significant levels. Notably, as the aerodynamic diameter of particulate matter decreases, the fattening effect on children increases, and researchers have begun to concentrate on the smaller particle size pollutants (PM1).

Of the 15 that were included in, around 73% were published in the last three years, and most were conducted in developing countries. It was compared a meta-analysis of the association between air pollutants and obesity in adults [28], where half of the included were published after 2019, with the difference that the areas were predominantly developed countries. An identifiable trend is that concerns about air pollution and childhood obesity are rising rapidly in developing countries. One plausible explanation is that although developed countries still maintain high rates of childhood obesity [30][31], the effect of air pollutants on body weight has been limited because air pollution levels have declined significantly in these countries [28]. Developing countries, in contrast, appear confronted with a double crisis, with increasing prevalence and growth rates of childhood obesity on the one hand [32], and deteriorating air quality resulting from urbanization and industrialization on the other [33][34]. Thus, numerous original ones were conducted in developing countries in recent years, and the effects tend to be more significant, further providing as the foundations.
As the main air pollutants of concern, particulate matter significantly influenced childhood obesity and BMI growth. The findings were consistent with the previous hypothesis that with smaller aerodynamic diameters of respirable particulate matter, the more toxic compounds would be adsorbed and also more easily inhaled deep into the lungs, therefore are more harmful to health [35][36]. In contrast to children, long-term exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 showed insignificant effects on adult obesity according to a meta-analysis that was conducted on adults [28]. Similar results were found for NO2 and O3, both pollutants were positively associated with the development of obesity. As can be seen, the effects of different pollutants on people can be diverse and complex, even for the same pollutant, the impact can vary depending on the characteristics of the population (for example, age, gender, region). These specific mechanisms require further investigation and validation.
While the mechanisms linking exposure to air pollution and obesity are not completely understood, biochemical mechanisms have been commonly mentioned and accepted as the main obesity-causing mechanisms in relation to air pollutants [12][25][37]. Firstly, from the perspective of human metabolism, air pollutants entering the body from the respiratory tract may increase oxidative stress in tissues and systems [38]. Take PM2.5, as an example, it can affect gene expression in mitochondria in brown adipose tissue, resulting in increased production of reactive oxygen species in brown fat stores, which lead to metabolic dysfunction [13], and susceptibility to lipid metabolism and glucose metabolism [39]. Secondly, the inflammatory response that is triggered by air pollutants can lead to vascular damage as well as insulin resistance, can also have an impact on body weight [14]. It was also found that the occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) was related to exposure to air pollutants [40]. Those who lived in regions with high NO2 and PM2.5 levels were much more likely to suffer from SDB, which in turn caused mental and physical health disparities [41]. Sleep deprivation correlated with decreased levels of leptin secretion, lower thyroid stimulating hormone secretion, and lower glucose tolerance, all of which may increase BMI status[15]. Finally, behavioral mechanisms can be explained in another direction [12]. For example, air pollution can reduce people’s willingness to participate in outdoor activities [16]. In addition, it can also improve the consumption of trans fats and fast food [42], which may contribute to obesity. However, attention should be drawn to the fact that while the obesogenic mechanisms of air pollution have been validated in animal models, uncertainties remain for humans or for different pollutants, and more research should be conducted to elucidate such pathways.
The strength is that it comprehensively and quantitatively assesses the relationship between long-term exposure to air pollutants and childhood obesity. Previous ones focused on the whole population [12]or adults [28], with limited on children and adolescents [43][44]. Meanwhile, the majority of the original ones that were included were published in the past three years, and the results are relatively new. Thirdly, the exposure doses in the original ones were mostly different, thus it is difficult to compare the effects, and it was converted the data in a standardized way to improve the comparability of the data. Finally, analyses and collations were performed according to the standard methods that are required by the PRISMA checklist.
However, there are many limitations that need to be noted. Firstly, although it was systematically searched the currently that is available epidemiological evidence, the amount was still limited and the potential sources of heterogeneity remain to be explored. When it was integrated the results across ones, the quality of the articles varied, exposure was not measured and estimated in a standardized way, analytical methods were imperfect, and the certainty of the evidence in the articles was generally poor, so caution should be exercised in interpreting the results as well. Secondly, the findings were based on numerous cross-sectional ones; therefore, causality was difficult to be determined accurately. According to GRADE system, the level of evidence for observational studies was still low. Thirdly, due to the complexity of growth patterns, the BMI that was applied to measure obesity in adults may not be applicable to a certain extent to children and adolescents. Fourth, for younger children (before two years of age), early obesity may be associated with the subsequent catch-up growth of low birth weight due to maternal exposure to air pollution [45], and the mechanisms for infants need to be further probed. Finally, obesity is a disease with complex causes, the magnitude of the direct role that is contributed by air pollution was unclear, and residual bias (for example, socio-economic conditions, physical activity) may still influence the outcomes. For example, high-income families (or parents with higher education levels) tend to live in more privileged residential areas with relatively lower levels of air pollution, better green spaces and have a more structured diet, while low-income families tend to be the opposite. Likewise, parents who live in more polluted areas may restrict their children's outdoor activities to reduce the exposure to air pollutants. These potentially confounding variables were not comprehensively captured and reasonably explained in studies

It was further revealed the risk of air pollution on childhood obesity. The implications of air pollutants are direct and significant, not only for human health but also for the climate. Therefore, policy-makers can also benefit from these findings that economic development and urbanization can create a number of problems, especially in developing countries, and require reflection on how to develop appropriate policies to balance economic development and environmental pollution. A synergistic approach to air pollution and climate change management that is based on global cooperation is essential. Important sectors such as transportation, energy, and manufacturing are the main focus of high emissions of PM, SO2, NOx, and GHG. It is imperative to accelerate the transformation of the energy mix and use technology to drive low-carbon production. At the same time, it is essential to establish an integrated system of atmospheric monitoring, emissions supervision, and pollution remediation.

It was also provides insights for future studies. Firstly, long-term cohort ones with large samples of children and adolescents across age, gender, and ethnicity are required in order to provide more representative and convincing results. Secondly, the diagnosis of childhood obesity requires more diverse anthropometric measures such as waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, subcutaneous fat, and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In addition, the health effects of ultrafine particulate matter still need to be clarified. Finally, interactions between multiple pollutants and their effects on humans also require estimation.

1. Introduction

Obesity has become a worldwide epidemic and urgent health issue [1]. The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased considerably in the last few decades and nearly tripled since 1975. With regard to children and adolescents, 340 million of them were overweight or obese in 2016, and this number continues to grow at a rapid rate [2,3]. Childhood obesity has been associated with obesity and increased risks for chronic disease in adulthood [4,5], and these adverse effects may last the whole lifetime [6]. Research has identified multiple factors that can lead to childhood obesity and it has been shown that childhood obesity can be attributed to genetic, dietary, and behavioral factors [7]. Despite genetic and metabolic predispositions, the rising epidemic of obesity indicates environmental factors may play a role in accelerating the progression of childhood obesity [8].
The Global Burden of Disease study revealed that air pollution can be the most adverse environmental health hazard for disease and mortality worldwide [9,10]. Well over 80% of urban dwellers suffer from air pollution, and the most seriously affected individuals were low-income residents [11]. In recent years, mounting evidence suggests that air pollution can be an obesogenic factor [12]. It is mainly through the biochemical and behavioral pathways that air pollution affects body weight. Metabolic disorders [13], inflammatory reactions [14], reduced sleep duration and quality [15] that are caused by air pollution all contribute to the accumulation of adipose tissue and weight gain, as has been demonstrated in animal trials. Additionally, the decline in air quality reduces a person’s willingness to engage in outdoor activities [16], which in turn increases indoor time, in order to reduce the impact of pollution on the human body [17].
Although there are numerous original studies on air pollution and obesity, the effects remained inconsistent and differed among the populations, pollutant types, and pollutant concentrations [12]. We found that previous studies were more concentrated on exposure during pregnancy [18,19], whereas recent studies have increasingly examined the direct effects of children’s exposure to air pollution on obesity [20,21]. However, the findings seem to be inconsistent even in studies of children and adolescents only [22,23,24]. For instance, Fioravanti et al. suggested that the evidence that air pollution causes obesity was limited [23]. In contrast, some studies indicated that long-term exposure to air pollutants might be correlated with weight gain and the development of obesity [20,21,25,26]. Among the available review articles, the existing studies have been mostly concentrated on adults or whole populations, and quantitative synthesis of the contribution of air pollution to children and adolescents remains scarce [12,27,28]. A meta-analysis by Parasin et al. examined the relationship between air pollution and childhood obesity, but did not distinguish between exposure during pregnancy and individual exposure, and also did not standardize when combining the effects of pollutants across studies [29]. Therefore, we believe that the topic still has potential for further research. As such, that this study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively analyze the scientific evidence on the influence of exposure to air pollution on weight gain and obesity in childhood.

2. The Association between Childhood Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Obesity

It was showed that long-term exposure to particulate matter and NO2 was significantly correlated with the risk of childhood obesity, while BMI also showed similar elevated results. Although O3 and NOx also had a positive effect on the increase in weight status, none reached significant levels. Notably, as the aerodynamic diameter of particulate matter decreases, the fattening effect on children increases, and researchers have begun to concentrate on the smaller particle size pollutants (PM1). Of the 15 studies that were included in the analysis, around 73% were published in the last three years, and most were conducted in developing countries. We compared a meta-analysis of the association between air pollutants and obesity in adults [28], where half of the included studies were published after 2019, with the difference that the study areas were predominantly developed countries. An identifiable trend is that concerns about air pollution and childhood obesity are rising rapidly in developing countries. One plausible explanation is that although developed countries still maintain high rates of childhood obesity [49,50], the effect of air pollutants on body weight has been limited because air pollution levels have declined significantly in these countries [28]. Developing countries, in contrast, appear confronted with a double crisis, with increasing prevalence and growth rates of childhood obesity on the one hand [51], and deteriorating air quality resulting from urbanization and industrialization on the other [52,53]. Thus, numerous original studies were conducted in developing countries in recent years, and the effects tend to be more significant, further providing foundations for the analysis of our research. As the main air pollutants of concern in the present study, particulate matter significantly influenced childhood obesity and BMI growth. Our findings were consistent with the previous hypothesis that with smaller aerodynamic diameters of respirable particulate matter, the more toxic compounds would be adsorbed and also more easily inhaled deep into the lungs, therefore are more harmful to health [54,55]. In contrast to children, long-term exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 showed insignificant effects on adult obesity according to a meta-analysis that was conducted on adults [28]. Similar results were found for NO2 and O3, both pollutants were positively associated with the development of obesity. As can be seen, the effects of different pollutants on people can be diverse and complex, even for the same pollutant, the impact can vary depending on the characteristics of the population (i.e., age, gender, region). These specific mechanisms require further investigation and validation. 虽然暴露于空气污染和肥胖的机制尚未完全理解,但生化机制已被普遍提及并被接受为与空气污染物相关的主要肥胖致病机制[122556]。首先,从人体新陈代谢的角度来看,从呼吸道进入体内的空气污染物可能会增加组织和系统中的氧化应激[57]。下午服用2.5例如,它可以影响棕色脂肪组织中线粒体中的基因表达,导致棕色脂肪储存中活性氧的产生增加,从而导致代谢功能障碍[13],以及对脂质代谢和葡萄糖代谢的易感性[58]。其次,由空气污染物引发的炎症反应可导致血管损伤以及胰岛素抵抗,也会对体重产生影响[14]。研究还发现,睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)的发生与暴露于空气污染物有关[59]。那些生活在高NO地区的人们2和下午2.5水平更容易患SDB,这反过来又导致身心健康差异[60]。睡眠剥夺与瘦素分泌水平降低、促甲状腺激素分泌降低和葡萄糖耐量降低相关,所有这些都可能增加BMI状态[15]。最后,行为机制可以在另一个方向上解释[12]。例如,空气污染会降低人们参加户外活动的意愿[16]。此外,它还可以改善反式脂肪和快餐的消耗[61],这可能导致肥胖。然而,应该提请注意这样一个事实,即虽然空气污染的致肥胖机制已经在动物模型中得到验证,但人类或不同污染物仍然存在不确定性,应该进行更多的研究来阐明这些途径。 本研究的优势在于,它全面和定量地评估了长期接触空气污染物与儿童肥胖之间的关系。既往研究以全人群为重点[12]或成人[28],但对儿童和青少年的研究有限[2562]。同时,本研究纳入的大多数原始研究都是在过去三年中发表的,结果相对较新。第三,原始研究中的暴露剂量大多不同,因此很难比较效果,我们以标准化的方式转换数据以提高数据的可比性。最后,根据PRISMA清单要求的标准方法进行分析和整理。 然而,这种荟萃分析仍有许多局限性需要注意。首先,尽管我们系统地检索了目前可用的流行病学证据,但研究量仍然有限,异质性的潜在来源仍有待探索。当我们将结果整合到各个研究中时,文章的质量各不相同,没有以标准化的方式测量和估计暴露,分析方法不完善,文章中证据的确定性通常很差,因此在解释结果时也应该谨慎。其次,研究结果基于许多横断面研究;因此,因果关系很难准确确定。根据GRADE系统,观察性研究的证据水平仍然很低。第三,由于生长模式的复杂性,用于测量成人肥胖的BMI可能在一定程度上不适用于儿童和青少年。第四,对于年幼的儿童(2岁之前),早期肥胖可能与母亲暴露于空气污染导致的低出生体重随后的追赶增长有关[63],需要进一步探索婴儿的机制。最后,肥胖是一种具有复杂原因的疾病,空气污染造成的直接作用的程度尚不清楚,残留的偏见(即社会经济条件,身体活动)仍可能影响结果。例如,高收入家庭(或受教育程度较高的父母)往往生活在更优越的住宅区,空气污染水平相对较低,绿色空间更好,饮食更有条理,而低收入家庭往往恰恰相反。同样,居住在污染较多地区的父母可能会限制孩子的户外活动,以减少接触空气污染物。这些潜在的混杂变量在研究中没有得到全面的捕捉和合理解释。 研究结果进一步揭示了空气污染对儿童肥胖症的风险。空气污染物的影响是直接和重大的,不仅对人类健康,而且对气候。因此,政策制定者也可以从这些调查结果中受益,即经济发展和城市化可能产生一些问题,特别是在发展中国家,并且需要思考如何制定适当的政策来平衡经济发展和环境污染。必须采取以全球合作为基础的空气污染和气候变化管理的协同办法。运输、能源和制造业等重要行业是PM、SO高排放的主要焦点2x和温室气体。加快能源结构转型,利用技术推动低碳生产势在必行。同时,建立大气监测、排放监管、污染治理等一体化体系至关重要。
Video Production Service