Evolutionary Medicine: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Olga V Anatskaya.

Evolutionary medicine is a rapidly developing field. There are two polyploidy-related aspects of it. Firstly, mutations and changes in expression patterns of many ohnologs are associated with various diseases and developmental disorders. Secondly (and probably more important), cancer is now interpreted as an evolutionary phenomenon, and polyploidy often arises in cancer.

  • evolutionary medicine

1. Evolutionary Medicine

Evolutionary medicine is a rapidly developing field [47][1]. There are two polyploidy-related aspects of it. Firstly, mutations and changes in expression patterns of many ohnologs are associated with various diseases and developmental disorders [14][2]. Secondly (and probably more important), cancer is now interpreted as an evolutionary phenomenon, and polyploidy often arises in cancer [48,49,50][3][4][5].

2. Ohnologs and Diseases

The currently existing ohnologs are in gene balance as dosage-sensitive genes [51,52,53][6][7][8]. Gene-dosage sensitivity has been of increasing interest as it might provide a clue for many pathologies [53][8]. The gene balance model states that a stoichiometric equilibrium is maintained among all of the complex gene products in a pathway, so a change in expression, mutation or copy number variation in a single gene of a pathway would be deleterious. The changes in ohnolog expression patterns are found in different types of cancers (breast, prostate, colon, thyroid, ovary, bladder, cervix, lung, uterus) and involved in tumor angiogenesis [52][7]. Human monogenic disease genes in the OMIM database are enriched in ohnologs [53][8]. Ohnologs are also highly enriched in the genes from the Disease Gene Network and the Network of Cancer Genes, which involve diseases with more complex etiologies (Figure 31). The NCG were from [9], the DGN (curated part) were from [10].
Figure 31.
The enrichment of human ohnologs in Network of Cancer Genes (NCG) and Disease Gene Network (DGN). NCG:
p
< 10
−46
, DGN:
p
< 10
−107. The NCG were from [54], the DGN (curated part) were from [55].

3. Polyploidy in Cancer

The main contradiction of multicellularity stems from its evolutionary origin, as it is between the cellular and organismal levels [12][11]. Cell pluripotency and proliferative potential are vital for the healthy development and longevity of multicellulars if held in check. In this case, activity at the unicellular level promotes an organism’s vitality. In contrast, runaway unicellularity results in cancer when cells tend to behave as independent evolutionary units. The atavistic theory of oncogenesis assumes that cancer is a reversal from a multicellular to a unicellular state and is frequently associated with polyploidization [50,56,57][5][12][13]. The genes and transcriptome modules of unicellular origin are overexpressed in human cancers, whereas multicellular genes and modules are downregulated [49,58][4][14].
These results were obtained on the bulk tissues and without control for cell cycle activity. Therefore the picture remained uncertain as: (i) cell cycle activity can be higher in cancer tissues; and (ii) expression of unicellular genes positively correlates with expression of cell cycle genes even if the overlapping genes are removed [59][15]. Yet, the upregulation of unicellular genes and the unicellular giant cluster of interactome was recently observed in the single-cell transcriptomes of various cancer types with the control for cell cycle activity [59][15]. Furthermore, the upregulation of unicellular genes and interactome giant cluster was shown in the invasive myeloma cells as compared with non-invasive cells. The upregulation of the unicellular giant cluster suggests that oncogenesis is not just an alteration in a few genes but the switching to ancient unicellular programs (when cells tend to behave as independent organisms). The interactome clusters have a higher interaction density within than between them, therefore they can serve as attractors (stable states of dynamic systems) of cellular programs. The unicellular cluster is denser (it has a higher inside/outside interaction ratio compared with multicellular clusters), which indicates a stronger attractor effect and helps explain why cells of multicellular organisms are prone to oncogenesis [12][11]. These observations suggest practical applications as certain unicellular-specific drugs can be applied for the treatment of cancer [60][16].
The upregulation of G2/M checkpoint genes with downregulation of G1/S checkpoint was found in polyploid breast cancer cells (called ‘G2/M vs. G1/S checkpoint inversion’) using single-cell transcriptomes with the control for cell cycle activity [59][15]. Probably, the hyper-activation of the G2/M checkpoint (which can be caused by DNA damage) retards the G2/M transition. In accordance with this suggestion, the genes belonging to G2/M transition were downregulated in polyploid cells, whereas the genes belonging to G1/S transition were upregulated (‘inversion of G2/M vs. G1/S transition’). The cytokinesis-related genes were downregulated [59][15].
Polyploidy results from the overall instability of metabolically stressed cancer cells [50,61][5][17]. In single-cell transcriptomes, the cancer cells show a higher scatter around the regression line of expression of the unicellular genes and interactome giant cluster on the cell cycle genes compared with normal cells [59][15]. This observation demonstrates a greater variability of cancer cells caused by their deviation from a stable, ‘canalized’ line (sensu [62][18]) of normal cells. Polyploidy facilitates chromosomal instability, which leads to aneuploidy and chromosome abnormalities increasing the probability of transformation [50,63][5][19]. Notably, under the influence of a carcinogenesis promoter (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate), human lymphocytes in primary culture continue DNA synthesis even when mitosis is blocked by colchicine or cytokinesis is blocked by cytochalasine, thereby forming cells with high ploidy [64][20]. This indicates the role of the loosening of cell cycle control in pathological polyploidization. Polyploidy in tumors is associated with resistance to radio/chemotherapy and poor prognosis [65,66][21][22].
Intriguingly, polyploidization by fusion of different cell types (epigenetic hybridization), which is frequently observed both in normal and cancer tissues [4[23][19],63], strikingly resembles allopolyploidization (genetic hybridization) in the evolution and agri/aquaculture described above. Cell fusion plays a crucial role in several physiological processes, including wound healing and tissue regeneration [4][23]. Thus, the bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) could adopt the specific properties of a different organ by cell fusion, thereby restoring organ function [4][23]. Similar to the allopolyploid organisms, the hybrid polyploid cells acquire stress resistance (e.g., chemo- and radiation-resistance) and adaptive plasticity. For instance, fusion with motile leucocytes such as macrophages renders cancer cells an ability to migrate, which plays a major role in metastasis [63][19]. Furthermore, cell fusion can be a mechanism of cancer stem cell formation [63][19]. Cancer stem cells present an important problem as they are resistant to therapy and serve as a source of new cells after the reduction in tumor mass by treatment [63,67][19][24].
Thus, polyploidy in cancer is associated with a poor prognosis as a result of resistance to stress, stemness, and an enhanced migration ability [50,63][5][19]. Paradoxically, albeit in normal tissues polyploidization frequently accompanies differentiation [1[25][26],68], polyploidy in tumors is associated with the features of fetality and stemness [50,63][5][19]. This paradox can be solved if considering cancer from an evolutionary viewpoint and comparing it with organismal polyploidy. Polyploid cancer cells show a general increase in adaptivity, which is reminiscent of the rapid growth, stress resistance, and the evolutionary plasticity of polyploid organisms. Stress caused by diseases, which results in the formation and survival of polyploid cells, can be considered as an analog of environmental stress conferring an adaptive advantage to polyploid organisms. In the polyploid cancer cells, the expression of the unicellular giant cluster of interactome is upregulated, whereas the multicellular cluster is downregulated, even as compared with diploid cells from the same cancer (Figure 42A,B). The pluripotency signature (PluriNet) is upregulated, whereas the genes involved in the regulation of multicellular organismal development are downregulated (Figure 42C,D). These facts indicate that the polyploidization of cancer cells enhances their unicellular properties and proliferative potential, at the same time reducing the multicellular-level control. The up- or down-regulated genes in polyploid cancer cells were from [27], which was based on the analysis of about ten thousand cancer samples. The UC and MC cluster genes were from [11], the PluriNet genes were from MSigDB [28].
Figure 42. The enrichment of human genes, which are up- or down-regulated in polyploid cancer cells as compared with diploid cells of the same cancer, in functional gene groups. (A,B)—unicellular (UC) and multicellular (MC) giant clusters of interactome.UC cluster: enrichment p < 10−157 in Up, underrepresentation p < 10−15 in Down.MC cluster: underrepresentation p < 10−14 in Up, enrichment p < 10−145 in Down. (C,D)—pluripotency signature (PluriNet) and regulation of multicellular organismal development GO:2000026 (MC development). PluriNet: enrichment p < 10−51 in Up, underrepresentation p < 10−11 in Down. MC development: underrepresentation p < 10−5 in Up; enrichment p < 10−28 in Down. The up- or down-regulated genes in polyploid cancer cells were from [69], which was based on the analysis of about ten thousand cancer samples. The UC and MC cluster genes were from [12], the PluriNet genes were from MSigDB [70].
This entry is adapted from 10.3390/ijms23073542 
Video Production Service