Nymphaea hybrid: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Sheng-Nan Lei and Version 1 by Sheng-Nan Lei.

若虫杂交种是若虫科女的多年生水生草本植物。它是芬芳,多彩,不可缺少的主植物在净水功能。Nymphaea hybrid is a perennial aquatic herb of Nymphaea in Nymphaeaceae. It is fragrant, colourful and indispensable as the main plant in features of water purification. The content of the paper includes the extraction from Nymphaea hybrid, isolation, structural characterization and evaluation of antioxidant capacity in vitro. 

  • Nymphaea hybrid
  • ultrasound-assisted
  • cellulase

1. 引言

1. Introduction

Nymphaea hybrid is a perennial aquatic herb of Nymphaea in Nymphaeaceae [1]. It is fragrant, colorful and indispensable as the main plant in features of water purification [2][3]. In-depth study of flavonoids and polyphenols of Nymphaea has widespread application prospects in functional food, medicine and cosmetics industries. However, the studies about Nymphaea hybrid have been focused on the aromatic components for fragrance application, while there are only a few studies about flavonoids and polyphenols and other active ingredients.

若虫杂交种是若虫科女的多年生水生草本植物[1]。它芳香,多彩,是净水功能中不可缺少的主要植物[23]。在过去的几十年里,科学家们越来越关注Nymphaea,发现一些Nymphaea植物的提取物显示出良好的抗氧化[4],美白[5],抗菌[6],抗炎[7],保肝[8],预防糖尿病和痴呆症[910]的效果。黄酮类化合物和多酚主要是若虫的活性物质,其良好的抗氧化和细胞保护活性令人印象深刻[411]。因此,对黄酮类化合物和多酚类若的深入研究,在功能性食品、医药和化妆品行业具有广泛的应用前景。然而,关于Nymphaea杂交的研究一直集中在香料应用的芳香成分上,而关于类黄酮和多酚以及其他活性成分的研究只有少数。

2. Extraction of active substances

合适的提取方法对于制备天然植物活性提取物非常重要。近年来,专家们探索了具有更好的提取效率,增强的绿度和更短的提取时间的新方法,例如微波[12],超声波[13],超临界提取[14]和酶水解[15]。超声辅助纤维素酶提取(UCE)是从天然植物中提取活性成分的新方法之一[16]。酶提取的基本原理是在温和的反应条件下使用酶作为催化剂破坏细胞结构,以便可以更快地释放活性成分[17]。此外,据报道,在优化条件下利用其热效应,机械波动效应和空腔效应,超声处理可以增强酶活性[16]。UCE不仅可以提高提取效率,还可以提高提取物的数量[181920,2122232425262728]。如我们所知,关于从Nymphaea杂交种中提取类黄酮和多酚的研究很少,特别是关于如何充分提取类黄酮的报告很少。因此,本文选择UCE配合响应面法(RSM)开发类黄酮和多酚杂交的黄酮和多酚提取工艺。

Ultrasonic-assisted cellulase extraction (UCE) was applied to extract flavonoids and polyphenols from the Nymphaea hybrid flower. The extraction conditions were optimized using the response surface method (RSM) coupled with a Box-Behnken design. According to the response surface experiment, the optimal process conditions for extraction were as follows: the liquid-to-solid ratio was 40.45:1 (mL/g), cellulase amount was 5.23% (w/w), the ethanol concentration was 52% (v/v). Under such conditions, the predicted flavonoid of NHE was 26.92 mg/g. To verify these optimal conditions, the experiment was repeated five times and the average actual flavonoid content of NHE was 27.26 ± 0.64 mg/g (n = 5), which was close to the predicted value and proved the validity of the models.

天然植物提取物通常是由多种活性成分组成的复杂混合物。最近的研究表明,类黄酮和多酚是Nymphaea提取物的最大二级代谢物组,并且在生物活性中起重要作用[29]。大孔树脂法通常用于进一步富集粗提取物中的活性成分[30]。它具有吸附效率高,操作简单,成本低,可重复使用,设备简单[31,32333435]等优点。

3. AB-8 Macroporous Resin

氧化应激是衰老和大多数与年龄有关的疾病的主要危险因素之一。它导致ROS水平超过细胞的抗氧化能力,导致氧化损伤[36]。有相当数量的化学[37]和细胞[38]测试用于评估用于筛选天然植物提取物的活性成分的体外抗氧化活性。化学测试操作简单,成本低,通常用于抗氧化和抗炎测定,如DPPH,ABTS和其他自由基清除测定,还原能力和透明质酸酶抑制测定[39]。细胞方法通过模拟人体环境来评估抗氧化剂,越来越普遍。常用的细胞包括成纤维细胞、人角质形成细胞和B16细胞[40]。越来越多的研究已经对活性物质如何降低UVA / UVB或H进行了研究2O2- 诱导人细胞氧化应激[41]。

NHEP was prepared by the purification of NHE with AB-8 macroporous resin. As shown in Table 1, the content of flavonoids and polyphenols in the NHEP sample was higher than in the NHE sample with the same dry weight. After purification, the contents of flavonoids and polyphenols in NHEP increased from 55.60 mg/g to 157.39 mg/g and from 414.97 mg/g to 888.63 mg/g, respectively. This result showed that it was efficient for the enrichment of flavonoids and polyphenols of NHE by AB-8 macroporous resin.

2. 单因素实验

采用超声辅助纤维素酶法制备NHE。该过程包括用纤维素酶酶酶水解,然后超声提取类黄酮和多酚。采用单因素实验和RSM对制备过程进行优化。为了探索不同条件的影响,我们在单因素实验中开发了四个因素和五个实验程序的水平。选择纤维素酶用量、液固比、酶水解时间和乙醇浓度等因素,确定其对黄酮含量的影响。如图1Ta所示,类黄酮含量首先随着液固比从20:1(mL/g)增加到40:1(mL/g),然后下降到40:1(mL/g)到60:1(mL/g)的范围内。NHE类黄酮含量的条件达到最大值,液固比为40:1(mL/g)。溶剂与固体接触面积的增加有利于活性物质的扩散[27],因此类黄酮含量随着液固比的增加而增加。当溶剂过量时,纤维素酶的有效浓度和非目标活性物质溶解的底物浓度增加,减少纤维素酶和底物的减少,导致NHE的类黄酮含量下降[2242]。图1b显示,类黄酮含量随着纤维素酶量从2%增加到4%而增加,但当纤维素酶的添加量高于4%时,类黄酮含量开始下降。纤维素酶可以将细胞壁分解成更小的分子,有利于活性物质的释放。过量的纤维素酶可能会产生粘稠的酶溶液,不利于破坏细胞井和酶促反应过程[43]。如图le 1c所示,在酶解时间60min处,类黄酮含量达到最大值。然而,类黄酮含量在60 min后没有变化,可能是由于类黄酮的扩散平衡。乙醇的浓度对活性组分的提取速率有影响。根据类似混溶性的原理,乙醇的浓度对活性组分的提取速率有影响[43]。如图1d所示,当乙醇浓度为50%时,类黄酮含量达到最大值。

. The content of flavonoids and polyphenols in the NHE and NHEP with the same dry weight.

Sample

Compound

Flavonoids Content (mg/g)

Polyphenols Content (mg/g)

NHE

55.60 ± 0.38

414.97 ± 2.95

NHEP

157.39 ± 1.18 *

888.63 ± 4.41 *

The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *: p < 0.05 compared to NHE.

4. Activity Determination by Chemical Method

To explore in vitro antioxidant activity of NHE and NHEP, the free radical scavenging abilities against ABTS, DPPH, and reduction power, were detected compared with VC. As shown in Figure 1, the IC50 values of the DPPH radical of NHE, NHEP and VC were 11.09 ± 0.15 μg/mL, 3.28 ± 0.03 μg/mL and 5.18 ± 0.06 μg/mL, respectively. The IC50 values of the ABTS radical of NHE, NHEP and VC were 18.21 ± 0.05 μg/mL, 10.50 ± 0.10 μg/mL and 7.77 ± 0.04 μg/mL, respectively. The reduction power of NHE, NHEP, VC for Fe3+ were strong with high absorbances [4]. The absorbances were 2.20 ± 0.04, 2.36 ± 0.04 and 2.60 ± 0.07 in the 1 mg/mL concentration, respectively. This result indicated that the scavenging free radical abilities and reduction power of NHEP were similar to VC and stronger than that of NHE. NHE and NHEP were also evaluated for the anti-inflammatory activity by using hyaluronidase inhibition assays. The IC50 value of NHE and NHEP in hyaluronidase inhibition assay was 0.55 ± 0.01 mg/mL and 0.32 ± 0.01 mg/mL. The inhibition rate of 10 μg/mL dipotassium glycyrrhizinate (Dg) was 94.23 ± 1.72%. This result showed that both NHE and NHEP display an anti-inflammatory effect, and NHEP has a stronger anti-inflammatory effect than NHE. Hence, in vitro bioactivity evaluation by chemical assays showed that both NHE and NHEP displayed strong free radical scavenging abilities against the DPPH and ABTS radicals, good reduction power, and anti-inflammatory effect.

Figure 1. The influence of different factors on the content of flavonoids in NHE. (

Activities of the NHE, NHEP and positive control by chemical method. (

a) Liquid-to-solid ratio, (

) DPPH, (

b) Cellulase amount (wt%), (

) ABTS, (

c) Enzymatic hydrolysis time (min), (

) Reduction power, (

d) Ethanol concentration (%). The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *: p < 0.05 compared between groups.

3. Response Surface Design

Based on the results of the single factor experiments, the liquid-to-solid ratio (A), cellulase amount (B) and ethanol concentration (C) were selected as the independent variables for optimizing the extraction process using the flavonoids content as an index. The results of the Box–Behnken experiment were shown in Tabl

) Hyaluronidase inhibition assay. Dg stands for Dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, and the concentration is 10 μg/mL. The date is shown as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

5. Characterization of FTIR and HPLC

Infrared spectroscopy analysis can be used as a powerful tool to characterize and identify functional groups present in the compounds. As shown in Figure 2, the absorption peak at the vicinity of 3424 cm−1 is relatively wide and strong, which is attributed to the stretching vibration of O−H. The signal in wavelength of 2930 cm−1 is assigned to the absorption peak of stretching vibration of the C−H bond of aliphatic hydrocarbon. The band at 3000-3100 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibration of C−H of the aromatic ring. The aromatic C−H bond was out-of-plane bending vibration, resulting in absorption peaks at 834 and 760 cm−1 wavelengths [5]. A characteristic absorption peak at 1718 cm−1 may be assigned to the carboxylic acid of a sharp stretching band of the C=O. The peaks at 1613 and 1449 cm−1 wavelength belong to the C=C bond of the aromatic ring vibrates [6]. The absorption peaks at 1512 cm−1 may be assigned to the aromatic skeletal vibrations, ring breathing with C−O starching vibration [5]. The adsorption peaks at 1449 and 1349 cm−1 are assigned to the bending vibrations of −CH3 and −CH2. The peaks at 1210 and 1038 cm−1 wavelength belong to the stretching vibration of C−H and C−O bonds [6]. The characteristic peaks of the benzene ring, C−O stretching vibration and stretching vibration of O−H, indicate the presence of phenolic hydroxy groups [7].

Figure 2. 1

. According to different experiments, the flavonoids content of NHE was 20.67–27.06 mg/g. As in

FTIR-NHEP illustrating structural features.

The total polyphenol and flavonoid compositions of NHEP were identified by the characterization of HPLC in Figure 3 and Table 2. This result showed some of the main NHEP bioactive phytochemicals, including gallic acid (1.60 ± 0.36 mg/g), corilagin (65.60 ± 3.36 mg/g), ellagic acid (97.72 ± 0.92 mg/g), rutin (34.41 ± 4.24 mg/g), myricetin (3.13 ± 0.87 mg/g), quercetin (4.64 ± 0.15 mg/g), naringin (4.03 ± 0.24 mg/g) etc. The contents of corilagin, ellagic acid and rutin in NHEP were higher among these components. These standard substances have been reported to have excellent antioxidant activity, which further indicated that NHEP has great potential as a natural antioxidant. Uddin et al. identified 9 bioactive phytochemicals from methanolic extract of Nymphaea nouchali using an HPLC system [8]. Among these compounds, rutin (39.44 mg/g), myricetin (30.77 mg/g), ellagic acid (11.05 mg/g), gallic acid (5.33 mg/g) and quercetin (0.90 mg/g) were polyphenols or flavonoids, which were also identified as bioactive ingredients of NHEP in this work. We found the ellagic acid content (97.72 ± 0.92 mg/g) of NHEP was much greater than that (11.05 mg/g) of Nymphaea nouchali and that (6.16 ± 0.019 mg/g) of ethanolic extract of Water Lily (Nymphaea Tetragona Georgi) [9].

Table 2, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the experimental data. Through the analysis of the multivariate regression fitting, the relationship between the response variables (flavonoids content of NHE, Y) and the quadratic regression equation is shown in the formula as follows:
Y = 26.79 + 0.46A + 0.53B + 0.59C − 0.46AB − 0.39AC + 0.41BC − 3.03A

. Polyphenols and flavonoids compositions of NHEP by the characterization of HPLC.

23.52
Table 2. Variance analysis of Box–Behnken regression model results.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquaresF-Valuep-Value
Model71.759697.973367.6019<0.0001 ***
A1.680111.680114.24450.0069 **
B2.252112.252119.09490.0033 **5

Standard

Retention Time

(min)

Regression Equation

R2

NHEP Compound (mg/g)

2 − 1.67C2
Tabl

= Coefficients of determination. The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

Figure 13.

Scheme and experimental results of Box–Behnken.
NO.A/(mL/g)B/(%)C/(%)Flavonoids Content (mg/g)
140:145026.62
240:156025.66
330:135021.30
44023.34
C40:12.781712.781723.58520.0018 **540:134022.83
AB0.854010.85407.24110.0310 *650:1460
AC22.73
0.598710.59875.07630.0589740:145026.40
BC0.668010.66805.66360.0489 *840:145027.06
A238.6989138.6989328.1105<0.0001 ***930:146022.30
1050:144022.65
11
C211.7205111.720599.3726<0.0001 ***30:144020.67
12
B26.9468Residual0.825670.1179  40:145026.92
Lack of Fit0.525130.17502.32930.21591330:155023.02
Pure Error0.30061450:135022.85
16.946858.89860.0001 ***40.07511540:145026.95
  
Cor Total72.585216   
R20.98861650:155022.72
1740:1360

Gallic acid

5.33

y = 28.696 x − 6.5794

0.9997

1.60 ± 0.36

Corilagin

16.21

y = 14.902 x − 40.435

0.9992

65.60 ± 3.36

Ellagic acid

30.58

y = 10.3 x − 11.978

0.9999

97.72 ± 0.92

Rutin

31.32

y = 10.71 x − 9.2865

0.9999

34.41 ± 4.24

Myricetin

40.86

y = 12.76 x + 4.3092

0.9996

3.13 ± 0.87

Quercetin

47.15

y = 11.001 x + 2.6758

0.9999

4.64 ± 0.15

Naringin

50.69

y = 34.715 x + 24.424

0.9999

4.03 ± 0.24

Y = The peak area (mAU*s); X = The concentration of standards (μg/mL); R

2 − 1.28B
R2 = Coefficients of determination. Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
The variance analysis of the Box–Behnken regression model results in T

HPLC of mixed standards (

a

) and NHEP (

ble 2 was obtained. The F-value of the equation model is 67.6, and the p-value is 0.0001 (p < 0.001), indicating that the model has an extremely significant statistical difference, and the model is meaningful. The high correlation coefficient value (R2 = 0.9886) indicates that more than 98.86% of the response variability is explained by the model. The p-value of lack of fit is 0.2159, the F-value of lack of fit is 2.3293 and the three linear coefficients, three quadratic coefficients and two interaction terms are significant and interact. The results indicate that the quadratic regression model fitted well with the actual situation, and the model could be used to analyze the flavonoid content of NHE.
According to the result of regression analysis, the response surface 3D map and the contour plot maps were drawn in

). 1-gallic acid, 2-corilagin, 3-ellagic acid, 4-rutin, 5-myricetin, 6-quercetin, 7-naringin.

6. HaCaT Cells and B16 Cells Experiments

As shown in Figure 4-7, the cell viability by CCK-8 assays showed that NHEP had no significant cytotoxicity for B16 and HaCaT cells when the concentration was below 100 μg/mL and 120 μg/mL, respectively. NHEP with a concentration of 20-160 μg/mL can more effectively reduce the ROS level in H2O2 damaged HaCaT cells compared with 10 μg/mL of VC. The 40 μg/mL of NHEP had similar activity against intracellular melanin production in the B16 melanoma cells compared with 20 μg/mL Kojic acid. Good activities of antioxidation, whitening and protective effect against H2O2-induced oxidative damage promote the potential for NHEP as a functional raw material in the field of cosmetics and medicine.

Figure 2. The 3D diagram can intuitively reflect the influence of the interaction of each factor on the response value, and through it, we can find the best parameters and the interactions among the parameters. According to the p-value, we can determine two interaction coefficients (AB, BC).

4. Cytotoxicity of NHEP on HaCaT cells. (a) cell viability of the HaCaT cells cultured with the NHEP for 24 h, (b) cell viability of the HaCaT cells cultured with the NHEP for 48 h. VC stands for Vitamin C, and the concentration is 10 μg/mL. Significance: compared with the control group, *** p < 0.001. The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

Figure 2a shows the interaction between the liquid-to-solid ratio and the cellulase amount (AB) displayed significantly (p < 0.05). The flavonoid content increases with the increasing liquid-to-solid ratio and cellulase amount, while at a higher liquid-to-solid ratio (40:1–60:1 mL/g) and cellulase amount (4–6%), the interaction effect was not obvious. When the amount of cellulase reaches a certain point, the flavonoid content may decrease with the increase in cellulase amount and enlarge the liquid-to-solid ratio. The reason for this may be due to the appropriate cellulase amount and an enlargement of the liquid-to-solid ratio will improve the solubility and increase the mass transfer rate, but the excessive cellulase amount with too high a liquid-to-solid ratio will affect the reaction efficiency and mass transfer efficiency, resulting in a flavonoid content decrease with the liquid-to-solid ratio. A significant interaction effect (p < 0.05) between cellulase amount and ethanol concentration (BC) was also observed in

5. Effects of NHEP on the ROS level of HaCaT cells with stimulation of H2O2: (a) ROS production, (b) fluorescence intensity by detected the DCFH-DA. VC stands for Vitamin C, and the concentration is 10 μg/mL (scale bar is 100 μm). Significance: ### p < 0.001 compared with the control group. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with the H2O2 stimulation group. The data are shown as the mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

Figure 6. 2c.

Cytotoxicity of NHEP on B16 cells: (a) viability of the B16 cells cultured with the NHEP for 24 h, (b) viability of the B16 cells cultured with the NHEP for 48 h. Significance: compared with the control group, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001. The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 5). KA stands for Kojic acid, and the concentration is 20 μg/mL.

Figure 27. Response surface 3D and contour plots of different factors to effect the flavonoid content of NHE. (a) Liquid-to-solid ratio and cellulase amount; (b) Liquid-to-solid ratio and ethanol concentration; (c) Cellulase amount and ethanol concentration.
According to the response surface experiment, the optimal process conditions for extraction were as follows: the liquid-to-solid ratio was 40.45:1 (mL/g), cellulase amount was 5.23% (w/w), the ethanol concentration was 52% (v/v). Under such conditions, the predicted flavonoid content of NHE was 26.92 mg/g. To verify these optimal conditions, the experiment was repeated five times and the average actual flavonoid content of NHE was 27.26 ± 0.64 mg/g (n = 5), which was close to the predicted value and proved the validity of the models.

Effects of the NHEP on B16 cells melanin production. Significance: compared with the control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The data shows as the mean ± S.D. (n = 5). KA stands for Kojic acid, and the concentration is 20 μg/mL.

This entry is adapted from 10.3390/molecules27061914

References

  1. Huihui Zhang; Huaiyan Wu; Qi Zhou; Runan Zhao; Qianqian Sheng; Zunling Zhu; Flowering characteristics and reproductive biology of Nymphaea hybrid, a precious water lily. Scientia Horticulturae 2021, 287, 110268, 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110268.
  2. Kai Uwe Nierbauer; Birgit Kanz; Georg Zizka; The widespread naturalisation of Nymphaea hybrids is masking the decline of wild-type Nymphaea alba in Hesse, Germany. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 2014, 209, 122-130, 10.1016/j.flora.2013.12.005.
  3. N.S. Abd Rasid; M.N. Naim; H. Che Man; N.F. Abu Bakar; M.N. Mokhtar; Evaluation of surface water treated with lotus plant; Nelumbo nucifera. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2019, 7, 103048, 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103048.
  4. Duraisamy Gomathi; Ganesan Ravikumar; Manokaran Kalaiselvi; Balasubramaniam Vidya; Chandrasekar Uma; In vitro free radical scavenging activity of ethanolic extract of the whole plant of Evolvulus alsinoides (L.) L.. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 2014, 21, 453-458, 10.1007/s11655-014-1763-0.
  5. Danny E. García; Nacarid Delgado; Francisca L. Aranda; Mariela A. Toledo; Gustavo Cabrera-Barjas; Eduard Maury Sintjago; Danilo Escobar-Avello; Sebastian Paczkowski; Synthesis of maleilated polyflavonoids and lignin as functional bio-based building-blocks. Industrial Crops and Products 2018, 123, 154-163, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.065.
  6. Danilo Escobar-Avello; Javier Avendaño-Godoy; Jorge Santos; Julián Lozano-Castellón; Claudia Mardones; Dietrich von Baer; Javiana Luengo; Rosa Lamuela-Raventós; Anna Vallverdú-Queralt; Carolina Gómez-Gaete; et al. Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds from a Grape Cane Pilot-Plant Extract in Hydroxypropyl Beta-Cyclodextrin and Maltodextrin by Spray Drying. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1130, 10.3390/antiox10071130.
  7. Samir Felhi; Hafedh Hajlaoui; Marwa Ncir; Sana Bakari; Naourez Ktari; Mongi Saoudi; Néji Gharsallah; Adel Kadri; Nutritional, phytochemical and antioxidant evaluation and FT-IR analysis of freeze dried extracts of Ecballium elaterium fruit juice from three localities. Food Science and Technology 2016, 36, 646-655, 10.1590/1678-457x.12916.
  8. Nazim Uddin; Abdus Samad; Abu Zubair; Zahurul Haque; Kanika Mitra; Tanzir Ahmed Khan; MdAmir Hossain; Ashikujaman Syed; Aklima Afroze; Potential bioactive phytochemicals, antioxidant properties and anticancer pathways of Nymphaea nouchali. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2020, 10, 555, 10.4103/2221-1691.297055.
  9. Gunhyuk Park; Yeomoon Sim; Wonil Lee; Sang Hyun Sung; Myung Sook Oh; Protection on Skin Aging Mediated by Antiapoptosis Effects of the Water Lily (Nymphaea Tetragona Georgi) via Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes. Pharmacology 2016, 97, 282-293, 10.1159/000444022.
More
ScholarVision Creations