Sustainable Production under Bio-Nanofertilizers of Selenium and Copper: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Yvaine Wei and Version 1 by Hassan Ragab El-Ramady.

Nanofertilizers indicates nanomaterials that include the plant nutrient itself or the plant nutrient as a carrier and macro-nutrient nanofertilizers, nano-zeolite, nano-hydroxyapatite, and nano-biofertilizers. Nanofertilizers are considered promising materials that display unique properties of nanoparticles at the nano-scale.

  • water quality
  • nanofertilizers
  • catalase
  • peroxidase
  • hydrogenase
  • enzymes

1. Introduction

Conventional fertilizers have caused many environmental problems such as inducing food contamination and soil degradation due to intensive use of these mineral fertilizers and pesticides [1]. Because of the poor conventional fertilizer use efficiency (ranging from 20 to 40%), a big amount of these fertilizers leached to groundwater and then rivers, causing economic damage, eutrophication phenomena, and problems for human health [2]. 
Many studies reported benefits that resulted from nanofertilizers applied to cultivated crops such as alfalfa [5][3], soybean [6][4], potato [7][5], cabbage [8][6], maize [9][7], and wheat [10][8]. These benefits of nanofertilizers may include improving fruit quality, productivity, and shelf life and reducing the leaching of nutrients into soil after the harvesting of crops [8,10][6][8]. The most common nutrients that are already applied as nutrient-based nanofertilizers include iron [8][6], copper [5[3][9][10],11,12], selenium [13[11][12],14], and zinc [10,15,16][8][13][14].
The quality of irrigation water is a limiting factor in producing agricultural crops, which have some irrigation water quality guidelines such as salinity and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), calcium, magnesium, sodium [17][15], and heavy metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Fe, Mn, and Zn [18][16]. When the used water in irrigation contains a high content of salts and heavy metals, these cause a low quality of the water and accumulate in both agricultural soil and cultivated plants [19][17]. This problem was aggravated by the intensive use of wastewater (low water quality) in the irrigation of cultivated plants, which contains many transferred pollutants to the food chain of humans and animals causing potential health risks in the long term [20][18]. Several studies reported the problems of saline and low water quality and their impacts on cultivated plants [20[18][19],21], soil quality [22[20][21],23], and projected human health [18,19][16][17]. Many materials have been applied to remediate this low water quality such as hydrogel [24][22], biochar [25][23], magnetic bentonite [26][24], and nanomaterials or nanoparticles [27,28][25][26]. Nanomaterials have been used in removing pollutants from contaminated water such as arsenic [28][26] and chromium [29[27][28],30], whereas the role of nanofertilizers in enhancing the productivity of cultivated plants irrigated with low water quality still needs more research. Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are considered one of the main vegetable crops worldwide due to their high dietary and commercial value, besides their nutritional value (rich in vitamin A and C, phosphorus, iron, beta-carotene, anthocyanins, and lycopene). Therefore, tomato is naturally high in antioxidants and may protect against prostate cancer and protect the human skin from UV radiation due to its high content of lycopene [31][29]. This crop has a long-growth season with high water requirements and could produce under different stresses such as salt stress [15[13][30],32], drought [31][29], copper toxicity [16][14], continuous irrigation using saline water [33][31], and nano-toxicity [34,35,36,37][32][33][34][35]. Few studies have been published about the impact of nanoparticles on cultivated tomato under low water quality irrigation such as nano-TiO2 [38][36] and nano-carbon [33][31], whereas there are no published articles on the effect of combined applied nanofertilizers on the productivity of tomato seedlings under irrigation with low-saline water.

2. Tomato Growth, Yield, and Its Quality

The production of tomato crop needs many growth factors especially proper and enough nutrients as well as the quality of irrigation water. When the cultivated tomato suffers from a problem in supplying nutrients or irrigation water, plant production will decline due to the stressful conditions. Under the global water crisis, there is an urgent need to utilize low-quality water sources in agricultural irrigation as an effective method for water shortage [53][37]. The main problems of low-quality water are represented by high levels of heavy metals, salts, and other pollutants, which may bring many environmental risks to soil and cultivated plants and consequences for human health.  In spite of the high quality of tomato fruits under the low quality of irrigation water in Baltim, the accumulation of heavy metals may threaten human health. Ma et al. [54][38] found that irrigation with wastewater led to an accumulation of some heavy metals such as Cr and Pb [54][38].

3. Irrigation Water Stress on Tomato Production

Low irrigation water quality causes stress on cultivated tomato plants, which was reflected by enzymatic antioxidants. Shoaib et al. [55][39] observed elevation in the antioxidant enzyme activities such as SOD, POX, and CAT which are strongly correlated to salt endurance in many plants [55][39].  The role of nano-Se or nano-Cu in improving tomato growth has been discussed in some recent studies such as nano-Se under salinity stress [56][40], nano-Cu under salinity stress [57,58[41][42][43],59], and both nano-Se and nano-Cu for biotic stress on tomato [60][44]. Soil enzyme activities are responsible for the biogeochemical cycles of many elements and are particularly sensitive to soil ecological changes; hence they have been commonly utilized as indicators to assess soil health and the level of contamination among the many soil properties [54][38]. It was found that irrigation with mine wastewater caused negative effects on the soil enzyme activity especially at the flowering stage due to the accumulation of heavy metals. Based on the biological impact of Se or Cu in ameliorating the stress on cultivated plants, these elements are components or co-factors of many plant enzymes such as CAT and POX, which work as enzymatic antioxidants.

4. Conclusions

The water crisis is a serious problem in several places all over the world, which need alternative sources. Therefore, the water of the Kitchener drain, as one of the biggest drains in the north Delta of Egypt, was used for irrigation in many rural areas in the Nile Delta of Egypt. However, the continued use of the low-quality water has led to the accumulation of a significant amount of salts and a high content of heavy metals and other toxins, which causes many environmental problems. The most important finding is the crucial role of bio-nano-Cu in enhancing the yield and quality of tomato fruits under irrigation with low water quality. In addition, the low quality of irrigation water led to the accumulation of salts, organic matter, and CaCO3 in the soil. Due to the salinity stress of irrigation water, plant enzymatic antioxidants and soil biological activity decreased. After 30 days from transplanting, all studied soil biological parameters (soil microbial counts and enzymes) were higher than the same parameters at harvesting after 80 days under different water qualities. The soil biological parameters were also decreased by increasing water salinity, which is considered an important issue for future research. Therefore, the use of a bio-nanofertilizer is promising in enhancing the productivity and quality of cultivated crops, especially under stress conditions. However, there are still many unanswered questions concerning different applied doses of these nanofertilizers for further studies that could take the following variables into account: the expected impact of low water quality of irrigation on the yield of other crops, on the one hand, and its impact on soil biological parameters under applied nanofertilizers, on the other hand.

References

  1. Sharma, S.; Rana, V.S.; Pawar, R.; Lakra, J.; Racchapannavar, V. Nanofertilizers for Sustainable Fruit Production: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 1693–1714.
  2. Seleiman, M.F.; Almutairi, K.F.; Alotaibi, M.; Shami, A.; Alhammad, B.A.; Battaglia, M.L. Nano-Fertilization as an Emerging Fertilization Technique: Why Can Modern Agriculture Benefit from Its Use? Plants 2020, 10, 2.
  3. Cota-Ruiz, K.; Ye, Y.; Valdes, C.; Deng, C.; Wang, Y.; Hernández-Viezcas, J.A.; Duarte-Gardea, M.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Copper Nanowires as Nanofertilizers for Alfalfa Plants: Understanding Nano-Bio Systems Interactions from Microbial Genomics, Plant Molecular Responses and Spectroscopic Studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140572.
  4. Yusefi-Tanha, E.; Fallah, S.; Rostamnejadi, A.; Pokhrel, L.R. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnONPs) as a Novel Nanofertilizer: Influence on Seed Yield and Antioxidant Defense System in Soil Grown Soybean (Glycine Max Cv. Kowsar). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 140240.
  5. Abd El-Azeim, M.M.; Sherif, M.A.; Hussien, M.S.; Tantawy, I.A.A.; Bashandy, S.O. Impacts of Nano- and Non-Nanofertilizers on Potato Quality and Productivity. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 388–397.
  6. Abdulhameed, M.F.; Taha, A.A.; Ismail, R.A. Improvement of Cabbage Growth and Yield by Nanofertilizers and Nanoparticles. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 15, 100437.
  7. Kumaraswamy, R.V.; Saharan, V.; Kumari, S.; Chandra Choudhary, R.; Pal, A.; Sharma, S.S.; Rakshit, S.; Raliya, R.; Biswas, P. Chitosan-Silicon Nanofertilizer to Enhance Plant Growth and Yield in Maize (Zea Mays L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 53–66.
  8. Sheoran, P.; Grewal, S.; Kumari, S.; Goel, S. Enhancement of Growth and Yield, Leaching Reduction in Triticum Aestivum Using Biogenic Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanofertilizer. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 32, 101938.
  9. Bonilla-Bird, N.J.; Ye, Y.; Akter, T.; Valdes-Bracamontes, C.; Darrouzet-Nardi, A.J.; Saupe, G.B.; Flores-Marges, J.P.; Ma, L.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; et al. Effect of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles on Two Varieties of Sweetpotato Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 277–286.
  10. Tang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Hong, A.; Zhang, X.; Kah, M.; Li, L.; Wang, Y. Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Bacterial Community to Copper Hydroxide Nanofertilizer and Its Ionic Analogue under Single versus Repeated Applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 796, 148974.
  11. Babajani, A.; Iranbakhsh, A.; Oraghi Ardebili, Z.; Eslami, B. Differential Growth, Nutrition, Physiology, and Gene Expression in Melissa Officinalis Mediated by Zinc Oxide and Elemental Selenium Nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 24430–24444.
  12. Moreno-Martín, G.; Sanz-Landaluze, J.; León-González, M.E.; Madrid, Y. Insights into the Accumulation and Transformation of Ch-SeNPs by Raphanus Sativus and Brassica Juncea: Effect on Essential Elements Uptake. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 725, 138453.
  13. Faizan, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Chen, C.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P.; Yu, F. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) Induce Salt Tolerance by Improving the Antioxidant System and Photosynthetic Machinery in Tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 122–130.
  14. Faizan, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Noureldeen, A.; Ahmad, P.; Yu, F. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and 24-Epibrassinolide Alleviates Cu Toxicity in Tomato by Regulating ROS Scavenging, Stomatal Movement and Photosynthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 218, 112293.
  15. Qadir, M.; Sposito, G.; Smith, C.J.; Oster, J.D. Reassessing Irrigation Water Quality Guidelines for Sodicity Hazard. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 255, 107054.
  16. Zakir, H.M.; Sharmin, S.; Akter, A.; Rahman, S. Assessment of Health Risk of Heavy Metals and Water Quality Indices for Irrigation and Drinking Suitability of Waters: A Case Study of Jamalpur Sadar Area, Bangladesh. Environ. Adv. 2020, 2, 100005.
  17. El-Hassanin, A.S.; Samak, M.R.; Abdel-Rahman, G.N.; Abu-Sree, Y.H.; Saleh, E.M. Risk Assessment of Human Exposure to Lead and Cadmium in Maize Grains Cultivated in Soils Irrigated Either with Low-Quality Water or Freshwater. Toxicol. Rep. 2020, 7, 10–15.
  18. Cakmakci, T.; Sahin, U. Productivity and Heavy Metal Pollution Management in a Silage Maize Field with Reduced Recycled Wastewater Applications with Different Irrigation Methods. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 291, 112602.
  19. Anjum, M.A.; Hussain, S.; Arshad, P.; Hassan, A. Irrigation Water of Different Sources Affects Fruit Quality Attributes and Heavy Metals Contents of Un-Grafted and Commercial Mango Cultivars. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 281, 111895.
  20. Kondash, A.J.; Redmon, J.H.; Lambertini, E.; Feinstein, L.; Weinthal, E.; Cabrales, L.; Vengosh, A. The Impact of Using Low-Saline Oilfield Produced Water for Irrigation on Water and Soil Quality in California. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 139392.
  21. Oubane, M.; Khadra, A.; Ezzariai, A.; Kouisni, L.; Hafidi, M. Heavy Metal Accumulation and Genotoxic Effect of Long-Term Wastewater Irrigated Peri-Urban Agricultural Soils in Semiarid Climate. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 794, 148611.
  22. Dhiman, J.; Prasher, S.O.; ElSayed, E.; Patel, R.M.; Nzediegwu, C.; Mawof, A. Effect of Hydrogel Based Soil Amendments on Heavy Metal Uptake by Spinach Grown with Wastewater Irrigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 311, 127644.
  23. Xie, Z.; Yang, X.; Sun, X.; Huang, L.; Li, S.; Hu, Z. Effects of Biochar Application and Irrigation Rate on the Soil Phosphorus Leaching Risk of Fluvisol Profiles in Open Vegetable Fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 789, 147973.
  24. Mateus, A.; Torres, J.; Marimon-Bolivar, W.; Pulgarín, L. Implementation of Magnetic Bentonite in Food Industry Wastewater Treatment for Reuse in Agricultural Irrigation. Water Resour. Ind. 2021, 26, 100154.
  25. Liu, J.; Williams, P.C.; Goodson, B.M.; Geisler-Lee, J.; Fakharifar, M.; Gemeinhardt, M.E. TiO2 Nanoparticles in Irrigation Water Mitigate Impacts of Aged Ag Nanoparticles on Soil Microorganisms, Arabidopsis Thaliana Plants, and Eisenia Fetida Earthworms. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 202–215.
  26. Alidokht, L.; Anastopoulos, I.; Ntarlagiannis, D.; Soupios, P.; Tawabini, B.; Kalderis, D.; Khataee, A. Recent Advances in the Application of Nanomaterials for the Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Water and Soil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105533.
  27. Lal, S.; Singhal, A.; Kumari, P. Exploring Carbonaceous Nanomaterials for Arsenic and Chromium Removal from Wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 36, 101276.
  28. Samuel, M.S.; Selvarajan, E.; Chidambaram, R.; Patel, H.; Brindhadevi, K. Clean Approach for Chromium Removal in Aqueous Environments and Role of Nanomaterials in Bioremediation: Present Research and Future Perspective. Chemosphere 2021, 284, 131368.
  29. Ahanger, M.A.; Qi, M.; Huang, Z.; Xu, X.; Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Zhang, C.; Ahmad, N.; Mustafa, N.S.; Ashraf, M.; et al. Improving Growth and Photosynthetic Performance of Drought Stressed Tomato by Application of Nano-Organic Fertilizer Involves up-Regulation of Nitrogen, Antioxidant and Osmolyte Metabolism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 216, 112195.
  30. Alharby, H.F.; Metwali, E.M.R.; Fuller, M.P.; Aldhebiani, A.Y. The Alteration of MRNA Expression of SOD and GPX Genes, and Proteins in Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill) under Stress of NaCl and/or ZnO Nanoparticles. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 773–781.
  31. Yan, S.; Gao, Y.; Tian, M.; Tian, Y.; Li, J. Comprehensive Evaluation of Effects of Various Carbon-Rich Amendments on Tomato Production under Continuous Saline Water Irrigation: Overall Soil Quality, Plant Nutrient Uptake, Crop Yields and Fruit Quality. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 255, 106995.
  32. Faizan, M.; Faraz, A.; Yusuf, M.; Khan, S.T.; Hayat, S. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Mediated Changes in Photosynthetic Efficiency and Antioxidant System of Tomato Plants. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 678–686.
  33. Akanbi-Gada, M.A.; Ogunkunle, C.O.; Vishwakarma, V.; Viswanathan, K.; Fatoba, P.O. Phytotoxicity of Nano-Zinc Oxide to Tomato Plant (Solanum Lycopersicum L.): Zn Uptake, Stress Enzymes Response and Influence on Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants in Fruits. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2019, 14, 100325.
  34. Younes, N.A.; Hassan, H.S.; Elkady, M.F.; Hamed, A.M.; Dawood, M.F.A. Impact of Synthesized Metal Oxide Nanomaterials on Seedlings Production of Three Solanaceae Crops. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03188.
  35. Ahmed, B.; Syed, A.; Rizvi, A.; Shahid, M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Khan, M.S.; Musarrat, J. Impact of Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles on Growth, Physiology and Yield of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Modulated by Azotobacter Salinestris Strain ASM. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116218.
  36. Bakshi, M.; Liné, C.; Bedolla, D.E.; Stein, R.J.; Kaegi, R.; Sarret, G.; Pradas del Real, A.E.; Castillo-Michel, H.; Abhilash, P.C.; Larue, C. Assessing the Impacts of Sewage Sludge Amendment Containing Nano-TiO2 on Tomato Plants: A Life Cycle Study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 369, 191–198.
  37. Zhou, B.; Zhou, H.; Puig-Bargués, J.; Li, Y. Using an Anti-Clogging Relative Index (CRI) to Assess Emitters Rapidly for Drip Irrigation Systems with Multiple Low-Quality Water Sources. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 221, 270–278.
  38. Ma, S.-C.; Zhang, H.-B.; Ma, S.-T.; Wang, R.; Wang, G.-X.; Shao, Y.; Li, C.-X. Effects of Mine Wastewater Irrigation on Activities of Soil Enzymes and Physiological Properties, Heavy Metal Uptake and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 113, 483–490.
  39. Shoaib, A.; Meraj, S.; Nafisa; Khan, K.A.; Javaid, M.A. Influence of Salinity and Fusarium Oxysporum as the Stress Factors on Morpho-Physiological and Yield Attributes in Onion. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 1093–1101.
  40. Morales-Espinoza, M.C.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Pérez-Alvarez, M.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Cabrera de la Fuente, M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Valdés-Reyna, J.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Se Nanoparticles Induce Changes in the Growth, Antioxidant Responses, and Fruit Quality of Tomato Developed under NaCl Stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 3030.
  41. Hernández-Hernández, H.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Sánchez-Aspeytia, D.; González-Morales, S. Chitosan-PVA and Copper Nanoparticles Improve Growth and Overexpress the SOD and JA Genes in Tomato Plants under Salt Stress. Agronomy 2018, 8, 175.
  42. Hernández-Hernández, H.; González-Morales, S.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Effects of Chitosan–PVA and Cu Nanoparticles on the Growth and Antioxidant Capacity of Tomato under Saline Stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 178.
  43. Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; López-Vargas, E.R.; Pinedo-Espinoza, J.M.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Valdés-Reyna, J.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Postharvest Behavior of Bioactive Compounds in Tomato Fruits Treated with Cu Nanoparticles and NaCl Stress. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 980.
  44. Quiterio-Gutiérrez, T.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Sandoval-Rangel, A.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Cabrera-de la Fuente, M.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. The Application of Selenium and Copper Nanoparticles Modifies the Biochemical Responses of Tomato Plants under Stress by Alternaria Solani. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1950.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback