XPS Study Calcining Mixtures of Brucite with Titania: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 4 by Guadalupe Alan Castillo Rodriguez and Version 5 by Guadalupe Alan Castillo Rodriguez.

The X-ray stimulation photospectrometry technique known as XPS is applied to determine chemical bond characteristics of organic and inorganic substances. On the other hand, the processes of chemical substance formation can be energetically activated by various mechanisms, one of them being thermal activation. Magnesium oxide (magnesia, MgO) and titanium oxide (titania, TiO2) are substances that, due to their chemical and energetic nature, can chemically react to form other chemical compounds when subjected to relatively high temperatures. During the sintering of MgO it is feasible to use some additives such as TiO2 to improve some properties, but during the process it is possible the formation of substances that limit its final application at high temperature. This review focuses on the relatively high-temperature synthesis and characterization of compounds based on MgO:TiO2 in a 50:50 wt% ratio, using the XPS technique and supported by XRD.

  • magnesia
  • titania
  • XPS
  • ceramics

1. Introduction

Sintered MgO is one of the most important ceramic material for the manufacture of basic refractory products, which have been used for many years in the production of steel, cement, and many other products on an industrial scale[1]. One of the sources of raw material to obtain sintered MgO in the world are brines[1][2]. 14% of the world's MgO production is synthetic magnesia and comes from the precipitation of magnesium hydroxide from seawater sources and brines. In Mexico MgO is produced in the form of hydroxide, caustic, burned to death and melted from the precipitation of brine combined with calcined dolomite. The initial material for obtaining sintered magnesia is synthetic Mg(OH)2, which is precipitated from brine combined with doloma; so, this material contains in the form of impurities other oxides from the composition of the brine and mainly from dolomite, for example, SiO2, CaO, Fe2O3 and Al2O3 mainly[2].

Magnesium hydroxide is a chemically defined compound with hexagonal/rhombohedral crystal structure and the product obtained, caustic MgO, during thermal decomposition at 960°C occurs in a cubic crystalline transformation centered on the faces[2][3]. During the thermal decomposition of magnesium hydroxide and crystallographic transformation, the presence of impurity ions in the brucite from dolomite can influence and this influence finally impacts the last stage to sinter and obtain the sintered MgO[2]. With the above, it is feasible to incorporate different ions into the crystal lattice of the base material, mainly in the form of microparticles in brucite, and evaluate their influence on properties such as the melting point of MgO[4]. It is feasible that the addition of Ti4+ cations modify the structure of raw materials for MgO-based refractories when they are added to Mg(OH)2 brucite before calcination at low temperature for hydroxylation. It is intended to demonstrate how the addition of Ti4+ cations added to brucite and their calcination at low temperature modifies the conditions of caustic MgO for the manufacture of raw materials for MgO-based refractories[4].

In this work, prior to the sintering of MgO, it is analyzed to replace Mg2+ cations by Ti4+ cations during the calcination of brucite whose substitution, because the ionic radius and valence number of the second is different, is expected to generate crystalline imperfections in the MgO network as vacancies. This work contributes to the knowledge of the formation of dense refractory ceramic phases that can occur in dense MgO and doped with TiO2, as well as its possible implications during performance during its application in industrial furnaces at high temperature.

In this work, the phases in the Mg-Ti-O system are studied using the 1:1 formulation of MgO:TiO2 mixing synthetic brucite of Mexican origin with high purity TiO2 microparticles and with a heat treatment at 960°C for 1 h. The raw materials and formulation are characterized by XPS and DRX techniques. The results demonstrate the presence of different oxidation states in titania and the formation of different oxides in the Mg-Ti-O system when mixed and calcined at 960°C; additionally, the formation of vacancies in the crystal lattice during the transformation from hexagonal brucite to magnesia with a cubic structure centered on the faces is estimated. With the results, its thermal behavior is noticed based on the MgO-TiO2 phase diagram.

 

2. Experimental procedure

2.1 Raw materials and sample preparation

The magnesia used in this work is high purity industrial grade produced in México from brines with the addition of doloma. Doloma is obtained by calcination of dolomite, which provides 40% of the final magnesium ions. The doloma is mixed with MgCl2 salts in aqueous solution obtained by crystallization from a natural brine mantle by the following reaction



The aqueous solution of MgCl2 is mixed with the doloma at room temperature producing the following reactions consecutively:





The aqueous CaCl2 is treated with the depleted brine of the reaction (1), which results in more magnesium ions



The aqueous MgCl2 is subsequently treated with the reaction (3) to obtain more magnesium ions. The magnesium hydroxide obtained from reactions (2) and (3) is calcined in a multi-home Herreshoff furnace at 1100°C and the industrial grade caustic MgO is finally obtained with 99.9% purity. The reactions of the process are outlined in Figure 1.

 

Figure 1. Representative diagram of the process of obtaining caustic MgO in Mexico[5].

 

The brucite obtained has a chemical composition as shown in Table 1., with high MgO content; ignition losses (LOI) correspond to the high content of chemical water in the form of ions (OH)2 associated with Mg and the content of water in physical form from the brine solution.

 

Table 1. Chemical composition of the brucite produced from synthetic brine in Mexico used in the present work.

MgO

(% weight)

CaO

(% weight)

SiO2

(% weight)

Fe2O3

(% weight)

Al2O3

(% weight)

LOI

(% weight)

46.00

0.31

0.04

0.02

0.04

53.59

 

A thermogravimetric analysis of brucite reveals the above in Figure 2., where physical water mass loss and chemical water loss (dehydration) occur at temperatures of 105.01°C and 450.3°C respectively. The loss of mass at 755.93°C is due to the loss of residual chlorides from synthetic brine.

Figure 2. Results of the thermogravimetric (TGA) and thermo differential (DTA) analysis performed on brucite.

 

Titania of high purity (99.99% purity) of Sigma Aldrich in the form of microparticle powders was used as an additive in the development of the present work. For sample preparation, the chemical reactions expected during the thermal process are as follows:

That is, the expected complete reaction is as follows:

In Table 2. the percentages by weight of the amount of brucite used in the formulations of the present work are presented, which were based on the molecular weights of the original substances and the product of the expected reaction.

Table 2. % by weight ratio for brucite and titania-based formulations.

Compound

Molar weight gr

% weight

Mg(OH)2

58.3197

42.20

TiO2

79.8658

57.80

Total

138.1855

100

 

In Table 3. the formulations studied in this work are presented.

 

Table 3. List of samples developed.

 

Mg(OH)2

% Mol

TiO2

% Mol

Brucite

Calcined

M4

100

0

0

M3

0

100

0

M2

0

0

100

M1

50

50

0

 

2.2 Experimental Development

For the preparation of the mixtures, TiO2 and brucite were mixed; the brucite was mixed with the titania in a porcelain mortar and homogenized manually. Subsequently, the mixture was placed in high alumina crucibles and placed in an oven where they were calcined at a maximum temperature of 960 °C for one hour with a heating ramp of 22 °C per min. Finally, the powder samples of caustic MgO mixed with the TiO2 particles were obtained.

 

2.3 Characterization by Spectrometry of X-ray Induced Photoelectrons

The samples were placed on carbon-conductive tapes to perform X-ray Induced Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analysis on Thermo Scientific Inc. Model K-Alpha equipment. This analysis was performed with a monochromatic Al K radiation with energy E = 1486.68 eV. In Figure 3. a photograph of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) equipment used in this work for the respective analyses is shown.

 

Image containing interior, refrigerator, kitchen, small

Automatically generated description

Figure 3. XPS Thermo Scientific Inc. Model K-Alpha.

 

In Figure 4. a photograph of the samples placed on the sample rack is presented for respective analysis by XPS.

 

Image containing kitchen

Automatically generated description

Figure 4. Samples placed on the plate for respective analysis by XPS.

 

2.4 X-ray Diffraction Characterization

X-ray diffraction characterization was performed with a Panalytical Empyrean model diffractometer, with a Co radiation with a wavelength of 1.79 Å, shown in Figure 5. The samples were analyzed with a scanning range of 11 to 144°, using voltage of 40 Kv and current of 40 mA.

 

Figure 5. X-ray diffractometer model Panalytical Empyrean.

 

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Analysis by XPS

For all experiments, the electron bonding energy in carbon was adjusted to 284.6 eV, and this is suggested to be carbon pollutant on the samples due to the handling of these. The XPS technique provides information on the change in the chemical status[6] of the species that make up the mixtures. In this work, the variation in the chemical state of the elements "O", "Mg", "Ca" and "Ti" in the different samples obtained was analyzed. Figures 6., 7., 8. and 9. show the spectra obtained by XPS from the formulations M1, M4, M2 and M3. The intensities of the peaks of O1s and Ti2p decrease when TiO2 is added to the brucite, indicating a decrease in these states with the addition of titania and the treatment of calcination of the samples at 960°C for 1 h.

 

Figure 6. High resolution spectrum of XPS of the M1 formulation (Brucite+TiO2 treated at 960°C 1 h with final ratio 1:1 Molar of MgO:TiO2). The presence of ions of Mg, Ti, Ca and O is detected.

 

Figure 7. XPS high resolution spectrum of the M4 formulation (Uncalcined brucite). The presence of Mg, Ca and O ions is detected.

 

Figure 8. High resolution spectrum of XPS of the M7 formulation (Burntish brucite at 960°C for 1 h). The presence of Mg, Ca and O ions is detected.

 

Figure 9. XPS high resolution spectrum of the M10 formulation (TiO2). The presence of Ti and O ions is detected.

 

Figure 10. shows a high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ti in pure TiO2. In this spectrum, the Ti2p3/2 double with binding energy 458.28 eV and Ti2p1/2 with binding energy 463.88 eV arises from the division of the spin orbit. These spikes are consistent with Ti4+ in the TiO2 network[7][8]. The 2p doublet peaks after deconvolution exhibited a tail in the region of lower binding energy, indicating the presence of lower Ti valence states, observed at the Ti2p1/2 peak at a binding energy of 457.18 eV corresponding to Ti3+ in Ti2O3[6]. This indicates that both TiO2 and Ti2O3 are present in pure titania.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 10. High resolution XPS spectra of Ti2p in titania of high purity, sample M3.

 

The existence of Ti3+ in TiO2 indicates that oxygen vacancies are generated to maintain electrostatic equilibrium according to the following chemical equation:

The □ represents an empty position that originates from the removal of O2− from the network. From the equation it can be deduced that a generated vacancy of oxygen is accompanied by two Ti3+ ions. Therefore, with the areas obtained at each peak of binding energy by XPS, it is feasible to determine the percentage of vacancies of O with the following equations[9]:

The calculation that the Ti3+/Ti4+ ratio yields, approximately 10% of the peak areas, and the percentage of oxygen vacancies in the high purity titania network used in this work is 2%. In Table 4. the data obtained from the measurements of pure titania by XPS are presented, and the calculations to obtain the percentage of oxygen vacancies in the network.

 

Table 4. Data from XPS measurements on the pure titania used in this work and calculations to determine the % of oxygen vacancies in the crystal lattice.

Ion

Peak Link Energy

eV

FWHM adjusted

eV

Area

CPS

eV

% Ti3+

%Ti4+

O/Ti

%O

% Vacancies of O

Ti2p3/2 (Ti4+)

458.28

1.25

61327.06

10%

90%

1.952022403

98%

2%

Ti2p1/2 (Ti3+)

457.18

1.25

5884.65

 

After mixing brucite with titania and a treatment at 960°C for 1 h, the high-resolution XPS spectrum in Figure 11. shows a slight change in position along with a variation in the area of the peaks with respect to those of pure titania. The peaks in the mixed samples of brucite with TiO2 are now at the binding energies 457.67 eV (Ti2p3/2) and 462.48 eV (Ti2p1/2) respectively and correspond to Ti3+.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 11. XPS high-resolution spectra of TiO2 mixed with brucite and calcined at 960°C for 1 hour M1.

 

Similarly, the bond energies 458.78 eV (Ti2p3/2) and 463.58 eV (Ti2p1/2) respectively correspond to Ti4+. Table 5. presents details on the data obtained and adjusted from XPS analysis of Ti2p for pure titania and brucite-with-titania mixture samples.

 

Table 5. Details of the data obtained from the XPS analysis of Ti for samples of pure titania and mixture of brucite with titania, the latter heat-treated at 960°c for 1 h.

Sample

Ion

Peak bond energy

eV

Area

CPS

eV

Area Quotient

FWHM

eV

High purity titania

Ti2p3/2 (Ti4+)

458.28

61327.06

1

1.25

Ti2p1/2 (Ti4+)

463.88

28448.06

0.46

2.1

Ti2p3/2 (Ti3+)

457.18

5884.65

0.1

1.25

Brucite+TiO2 mixture heating at 960°C

1 h (1:1 Molar MgO:TiO2)

Ti2p3/2 (Ti3+)

457.67

20875.58

1

1.28

Ti2p3/2 (Ti4+)

458.78

563.34

0.03

1.28

Ti2p1/2 (Ti4+)

463.58

5352.75

0.27

1.28

Ti2p1/2 (Ti3+)

462.48

1189.54

0.06

1.28

 

After mixing and heat treatment, the peak area of Ti2p3/2 with a binding energy of 457.67 eV, which is very close to 457.18 eV of Ti3+ in pure titania, increased by 3.55 times; similarly, the peak area of Ti2p3/2 in the mixture of brucite and titania with a binding energy of 458.28 eV, which is very close to 458.78 eV of the Ti4+ of pure titania, decreased by 99%. This suggests that the oxidation state present in the sample of brucite mixed with titania after heat treatment may correspond to Ti3+, but there is a possibility that it is due to a mixture of oxides with different stoichiometry. The change in stoichiometry was estimated by the change in the area of relative peaks.

The increase in the Ti3+ peak area indicates that after brucite doping and heat treatment oxygen is removed from the network, showing a relative increase in Ti3+ in the XPS spectrum. On the other hand, with the decrease in the area of the Ti4+ peak , the reaction of Mg2+ ion substitutions in the TiO2 network is inferred due to the reaction of Ti4+ ion substitutions in the MgO network from the transformation of brucite at 960°C, and conversely, so that mixtures of magnesia-titania-oxygen Oxides Mg-Ti-O are formed with different oxidation states and/or stoichiometries, as demonstrated below with the X-ray diffraction results.

The increase in the peak area of Ti3+ indicates that some mixed oxide structure is formed in large quantities with Mg with Ti3+ and/or Ti4+ oxidation state after doping. Meanwhile, the decreasing area of Ti4+ indicates a reduction of TiO2 in the sample and probably the formation of a Ti-O-Mg structure in the TiO2 network through the substitution of Mg ions. The observed change in the peaks also indicates the influtenceraction between the Ti and Mg atoms and a superposition of their 3d orbital[10].

Figure 12. shows the XPS high resolution spectrum of O1s in high purity TiO2, which is composed of four peaks with binding energies 528.28 eV, 529.48 eV, 531.18 eV and 532.18 eV. The highest binding energy at 532.18 eV is generally attributed to oxygen or hydroxyl (OH) species chemically absorbed or dissociated at the sample surface, such as adsorbed H2O[11]. The 531.18 eV bond energy component of O1s is associated with O2 ions found in the compound Ti2O3[12], which is consistent with the XPS spectrum for Ti2p in Figure 10. The 528.28 eV bond energy component of O1s is associated with O2 ions found in oxygen-deficient regions within the TiO2 matrix promoted by the present chemical state of Ti3+.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 12. XPS high resolution spectra of O1s titania pure M10.

 

As a result, changes in the intensity of this component may be related to variations in the concentration of oxygen vacancies (VO)[13], which is consistent with the peak bond 531.18 eV in the same spectrum by the chemical state of Ti3+, as well as with the XPS spectrum for Ti2p in Figure 10. The peak intensity with binding energy of 529.48 eV exceeds all other peaks, indicating the strong ti-O binding in the pure TiO2 compound and this value is consistent with what was reported in reference[8] and is further consistent with the XPS spectrum for Ti2p in Fig. 10.

Figure 13. presents the high-resolution XPS spectrum of O1s from the mixture of brucite with heat-treated titania. It consists of three peaks with link energies 530.08 eV, 530.89 eV and 532.28 eV. The lowest bond energy of 530.08 eV corresponds to the strong bonds of O1s with different Oxides of Ti[14]. The mean binding energy of 530.89 eV corresponds to O1s bonds with MgO[15][16]. The highest bond energy of 532.28 eV corresponds to both MgO[17] and different Ti oxides[16]. All the binding energies of the xpS high-resolution spectra obtained for O1s in the samples of mixing TiO2 with brucite and heat-treated at 960°C for 1 h, show congruence with the phases determined in the X-ray diffractograms (XRD).

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 13. Titania's XPS high-resolution O1s spectra mixed with brucite and calcined at 960°C for 1 hour M1

 

From Figures 12. to 13. it is observed that the peak with binding energies 531.18 eV corresponding to Ti2O3 disappears after doping with brucite and heat treatment, but another very intense peak appears with binding energy of 530.08 eV corresponding to different types of Ti oxides, which indicates that in the process a mixture of different oxides is formed between Ti4+, Ti3+ and Mg2+, including TiO2. This is consistent with the phases identified in the X-ray diffraction diagrams. Again, the peak O1s binding energy of 528.28 eV corresponding to Ti3+ in pure titania shifts slightly to 530.08 eV after doping with brucite and heat treatment, which indicates that together with TiO2 a mixture of Mg-Ti-O oxides is formed.

The change in stoichiometry is estimated by the change in the area of relative peaks. In this case, the O1s peak of 531.18 eV corresponding to Ti3+ in pure titania shifts slightly to 530.08 eV, which corresponds to a mixture of different oxidation states, and increases its area by 15.2 times.

Doping with Mg2+ ions by brucite results in a minor change in binding energy, indicating that Mg2+ ions are better dispersed at TiO2 network substitution sites and produce more Mg-O-Ti mixed oxide structure, which is consistent with the results of phases identified with X-ray diffraction as shown below. Table 6 presents details on the data obtained and adjusted from the XPS analysis of O1s for pure titania and brucite-with-titania mixture samples.

 

Table 6. Details of the data obtained from xpS analysis of O1s for samples of pure titania and brucite mixture with titania, the latter heat-treated at 960°c for 1 h.

Sample

Ion

Peak bond energy

eV

Area

CPS

eV

Area Quotient

FWHM

eV

High purity titania

O1s (TiO2)

529.48

69980.14

1

1.28

O1s (TiO2)

528.28

2063.12

0.03

1.28

O1s (TiO2)

531.18

9409.16

0.13

1.28

O1s (TiO2)

532.18

4566.09

0.07

1.28

Brucite+TiO2 mixture heating at 960°C 1 h

(1:1 Molar MgO:TiO2)

O1s (TiO2)

530.08

143009.15

1

2.50

O1s (TiO2)

530.89

2208.72

0.02

2.50

O1s (TiO2)

532.28

14419.95

0.10

2.50

 

Figure 14. presents the XPS high-resolution spectrum of Mg1s of brucite without doping with TiO2 and without heat treatment. It consists of a single peak with a binding energy of 1302.69 eV, which corresponds to the Brucite compound, Mg(OH)2[18]; this measurement is consistent with X-ray diffraction results. To characterize the brucite and analyze its transformation when comparing against the mixture, brucite was calcined at 960°C for 1 h without doping with TiO2.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 14. XPS high resolution spectra of Mg1s in Brucite M8.

 

Figure 15. presents the XPS high-resolution spectrum of Mg1s for calcined brucite. It consists of a single peak with a binding energy of 1304.30 eV, which corresponds to the compound of Magnesia, MgO corresponding to Mg2+[19].

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 15. XPS high resolution spectra of Mg1s in burned brucite at 960°C for 1 hour M7.

 

Figure 16. presents the XPS high-resolution spectrum of Mg1s of the mixture of brucite with heat-treated titania. It consists of four peaks with link energies 1302.98 eV, 1303.39 eV, 1304.18 eV and 1305.08 eV. The lowest bond energy of 1302.98 eV is very close to the 1302.69 eV obtained from uncalcined brucite shown in Figure 14., so it is attributed to the strong bonds of Mg1s electrons in the Brucite compound, Mg(OH)2[18], it is observed that its area is reduced by 98.42% from 122,078.39 eV to 1,917.12 eV, which is consistent with the X-ray Diffraction results presented below.

 

GraphicAutomatically generated description

Figure 16. XPS high resolution spectra of Mg1s in titania mixed with brucite and calcined at 960°C for 1 hour M1.

 

The binding energy of 1303.39 eV, according to its high peak area corresponding to the percentage obtained in X-ray diffraction analyses, is attributed to the strong bonds of Mg1s electrons in the compound MgTi2O5. The binding energy of 1304.18 eV is very close to the 1304.30 eV obtained from the calcined brucite shown in Figure 15., so it is attributed to the strong bonds of the Mg1s electrons in the Magnesia compound, MgO corresponding to Mg2+[19], which is consistent with the X-ray Diffraction results presented later. The binding energy of 1305.08 eV, according to its peak area corresponding to the percentage obtained in X-ray diffraction analyses, is attributed to the strong bonds of Mg1s electrons in the MgTiO3 compound. Figure 17. presents the XPS high-resolution Spectrum of Ca2p of brucite without heat treatment. It consists of a single peak with binding energy of 350.18 eV that is attributed to the compound Ca(OH)2.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 17. High resolution XPS Ca2p spectrum in Brucite M8.

 

Figure 18. presents the XPS high-resolution spectrum of heat-treated brucite with two peaks with binding energy 346.98 eV and 349.89 eV corresponding to Ca2p3/2 and Ca2p1/2 respectively; according to reference[20], the corresponding peaks in CaO are 347 and 351 eV, so the difference is attributed to the presence of the compound Ca(OH)2 by humidity of the environment.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 18. XPS high resolution spectrum of Ca2p in burned brucite at 960°C for 1 hour M7.

 

Figure 19. presents the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ca2p of the mixture of brucite with heat-treated titania. It consists of two peaks with link energies 347.28 eV and 350.48 eV. When comparing the binding energies with the peaks in Figure 18., a slight displacement of 0.3 and 0.6 eV is observed, which could be attributed to the presence of TiO2 and the partial formation of CaTiO3 with CaO present, which is demonstrated with the X-ray Diffraction analysis.

 

Chart, Line ChartAutomatically generated description

Figure 19. XPS high resolution spectrum of Ca2p in titania mixed with brucite and calcined at 960°C for 1 hour M1.

 

3.2 Analysis by DRX

The diffractogram in Figure 20. shows the different compounds detected in the M1 mixture. For the compound MgTi2O5 with a percentage by weight of 20.96%, angles 21.173°, 29.662°, 37.964°, 43.543°, 44.116°, 54.134°, 57.088°, 65.684°, 70.625°,71.346° were detected, of which its diffraction planes are: (200), (220), (230), (131),( 311), (430), (002), (222), (232), (531), respectively and these coincide with the values of the reference PDF 04-009-8048. For the MgTiO3 compound with a percentage by weight of 13.21%, the matching angles are: 27.954°, 57.769°, and its diffraction planes are: (012) and (024) respectively according to PDF reference 01-080-2548. A percentage by weight of 14.37% MgO was detected, and the angles referenced as MgO are: 43.174°, 50.279°, 73.852°, 89.578°, 94.749°, 116.346° and 143.567°, and their diffraction planes are as follows: (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (420), respectively, according to the reference PDF 04-004-8990.

For TiO2 with the highest percentage by weight of 38.21%, its angles coincide 31.980°, 42.157°, 45.854°, 48.283°, 51.642°, 64.038°, 66.863°, 76.044°, 83.275°, 99.743°, 111.463°, 118.212°, 119.330° and 121.167° of which their diffraction planes are: (110), (101), (200), (111), (210), (211), (310), (112), (321), (330), (411), (312) and (420), respectively according to the values referenced in PDF 04-008-4342. Mg(OH)2 has a percentage by weight of 6.92%, and the angles obtained in the diffractogram coincide with the values of the reference PDF 04-016-3445, whose angles are: 38.320°, 73.547°, 119.691° and 142.158°, and their respective diffraction planes are: (100), (111), (023), and (122), respectively.

 

Chart, Histogram

Automatically generated description

Figure 20. X-ray diffractogram of the formulation M1 (Titania mixed with brucite and calcined at 960°C for 1 hour).

 

Ca(OH)2 is present by 6.34% by weight in the M1 mixture, and this can be verified since the angles obtained coincide with the pdf reference 01-076-0570. The angles are: 21.124°, 74.382° and 115.478°, which have the following diffraction planes: (001), (201) and (122) respectively. The CaTiO3 compound is present with 1.47% by weight, its angles are referenced with JCPDF: 86-1393, whose congruent angle is 47.5° and its diffraction plane is (220); additionally, according to the ICSD reference 98-003-7263 the corresponding angles are 47.5° and 69.4° and its corresponding diffraction planes are: (040) and (242) respectively.

Figure 21. presents the DRX diagram of the mixture M7 (calcined brucite), which resulted in caustic MgO. The planes obtained in X-ray diffraction are as follows: (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), (420) and correspond to angles 43.174°, 50.279°, 73.852°, 89.578°, 94.749°, 116.346°, 135.607° and 143.567° respectively, according to PDF 04-004-8990. By comparing this information with the XPS analysis, it can be concluded that MgO is present in this formulation.

 

Graphic

Automatically generated description

Figure 21. Diffractogram of the formulation M7(Burnt brucite at 1100°C 1 h).

 

In the formulation of the M8 brucite was used, in Figure 22. its diffractogram is shown. In this sample two compounds were determined, and the planes obtained from Mg(OH)2 are as follows: (001), (100), (011), (102), (110), (111), (013), (021), (022), (014), (023), (211). And according to the angles 21.626°, 38.320°, 44.426°, 59.801°, 68.503°, 69.289°, 73.547°, 81.316°, 82.055°, 86.114°, 97.254°, 98.238°, 106.251°, 109.983°, 119.691°, 120.539°, 125.340°, 139.446°, 140.605°, 142.158°, 159.860°, 167.217° and 171.116° respectively, and agrees with the PDF reference 04-016-3445.

Graphic

Automatically generated description

Figure 22. Diffractogram of the M8 formulation (Uncalcined brucite).

 

For Ca(OH)2 which is present only 0.20% by weight, the following diffraction planes were detected: (001), (100), (011), (012), (110), (111), (201), (103), (121) and (122), correspondingly at angles 21.124°, 33.479°, 39.925°, 43.012°, 55.576°, 59.849°, 64.209°, 66.719°, 70.343°, 74.382°, 76.498°, 76.742°, 86.122°, 94.311°, 95.881°, 99.281°, 103.212°, 103.941°, 105.573°, 115.478°, 119.558°, 124.083°, 124.945°, 132.84°, 137.611°, 140.004°, 147.766° and 172.165°, according to PDF reference 01-076-0570. Comparing these compounds with the XPS results, we can confirm that in the M8 formulation, the compound Ca(OH)2 is present.

Figure 23. shows the diffractogram of TiO2. According to this diagram, in the mixture of the formulation M10 the compound TiO2 is present. In the same diffractogram, the planes with their respective angles 2θ belonging to this compound are shown according to PDF 04-008-4342, which supports the presence of TiO2.

 

Graphic

Automatically generated description

Fig. 23. Diffractogram of the formulation M10 (Titania of high purity), showing the identification of TiO2).

 

For the M10 formulation the presence of the compound Ti2O3 was also found, and below is the diffractogram of this compound in Figure 24.

 

Graphic

Automatically generated description

Figure 24. Diffractogram of the formulation M10 (Titania of high purity), showing the identification of Ti2O3.

 

As can be seen in the diffractograms and in the XPS spectra, it is confirmed that by mixing TiO2 with industrial grade brucite of national origin and calcining at low temperature (960°C) in a short period of time (1 h), it is possible to form ceramic phases in the Mg-Ti-O system mainly. The compounds that are obtained are MgTi2O5, MgTiO3, MgO and TiO2 mainly. The percentages obtained are relatively high, approximately 21, 13, 14 and 38% for MgTi2O5, MgTiO3, MgO and TiO2 respectively. When analyzing the phase diagram in Figure 25. it can be seen that the compounds between MgTi2O5 and MgTiO3 have melting points between 1605°C and 1660°C.

 

DiagramAutomatically generated description

Figure 25. Phase diagram of MgO and TiO2 showing the phases formed with different contents of the substances at different temperatures[21].

 

Considering that MgO-based refractory materials produced from double calcined brucite are used in melting processes with temperatures above 1537°C in steel production, for example, it is appropriate to take care of the formation of these compounds during the sintering of MgO if it is doped with Titanium ions by micro or TiO2 nanoparticles.

Table 7 shows that the reticular values of the titania and magnesium titanate phases are exactly consistent with the values of the crystal structure of these compounds, as well as the MgO lattice parameters in the calcined brucite (M2) sample; on the other hand it is observed that the reticular values of MgO in the mixture of brucite with heat-treated titania at a temperature of 960°C for 1 h (M1), the network parameters of MgO are modified as a result of the presence of Ti ions in its crystal structure and possible vacancies generated by the greater number of valence electrons between Mg and Ti.

 

Table 7. Network parameters obtained from DRX analysis for samples of pure calcined brucite (M2) and brucite mixture with titania (M1), both heat-treated at 960°c for 1 h.

Sample

Compound

Crystal structure

Space group

a

Å

b

Å

c

Å

α

°

β

°

γ

°

M2

MgO

Cubic

F m -3 m (225)

4.213313

4.213313

4.213313

90

90

90

M1

MgO

Cubic

F m -3 m (225)

4.21156

4.21156

4.21156

90

90

90

MgTiO3

Rhombohedral

R -3

(148)

5.0549

5.0549

13.8939

90

90

90

MgTi2O5

Orthorhombic

C m c m (63)

3.7428

9.7387

9.9976

90

90

90

TiO2

Tetragonal

P 42/m n m (136)

4.59327

4.59327

2.95892

90

90

90

 

4. Conclusions

It is concluded that the incorporation of Ti4+ ions by mixing TiO2 microparticles in the brucite, modifies the network structure of the caustic MgO obtained after its calcination at 960°C 1 h, forming compounds of the Mg-Ti-O system; In addition, it is concluded that Ti4+ modifies the size of the crystal structure possibly due to the demand of twice as many O2 ions- generating vacancies in the crystal structure.

It is concluded that the presence of TiO2 in brucite promotes the formation of MgTi2O5 and MgTiO3 compounds, whose compounds have relatively low melting points and care must be taken during the addition of said oxide in the densification of the double calcined MgO. Additionally, it is concluded that the low oxidation states in TiO2 generate oxygen vacancies in the crystal lattice structure. Finally, it is concluded that, of the impurities of Ca, Fe, Al and Si in the mexican brucite, only the presence of Ca influences during calcination in the interaction of TiO2 forming CaTiO3 compounds.

 

References

  1. Schacht, C.. Refractories Handbook; Schacht, Charles A., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2004; pp. 109, 112.
  2. Shand, M. A.. The Chemistry and Technology of Magnesia; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006; pp. 12, 39, 33-35.
  3. BRUCITE. (2018, 21 April). Fdminerals, Minerals and Fossils Collection. https://www.fdminerals.es/2018/04/21/brucita/
  4. Hernández Reséndiz, M.; Estudio comparativo sobre los efectos en las propiedades microestructurales de la magnesia sinterizada con adiciones de nanopartículas de titania partiendo de precursores de Mg(OH)2 y MgO cáustico de origen sintético en México; Tesis, UANL México; 2021.
  5. Castillo Rodríguez, G. A.; Estudio experimental de la fusión de magnesia por horno de arco eléctrico para la industria refractaria; Tesis UANL, México, 1992.
  6. Crist, B. V. & XPS International. (2004). Handbooks of Monochromatic XPS Spectra (Vol. 1). XPS International LLC.
  7. Blasco T., Camblor M.A., Corma A., Perez-Pariente J.; The state of Ti in titanoaluminosilicates isomorphous with zeolite β; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 11806 (1993).
  8. Ch. Cardinaud - G. Lemperiere - M.C. Peignon - P.Y. Jouan, Characterisation of TiN coatings and of the TiN/Si interface by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy, Applied Surface Science, Vol 68, pp. 595-603. 1993.
  9. Xudong Jiang, Yupeng Zhang, Jing Jiang, Yongsen Rong, Yancheng Wang, Yichu Wu, and Chunxu Pan; Characterization of Oxygen Vacancy Associates within Hydrogenated TiO2: A Positron Annihilation Study. American Chemical Society J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 22619−22624 doi.org/10.1021/jp307573c
  10. Enjun Wang, Wensheng Yang, and Yaan Cao; Unique Surface Chemical Species on Indium Doped TiO2 and Their Effect on the Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20912–20917
  11. P. T. Hsieh, Y.C. Chen, K. S. Kao and C.M. Wang; Luminescence mechanism of ZnO thin film investigated by XPS measurement. Appl. Phys. A 90, 317–321 (2008). DOI: 10.1007/s00339-007-4275-3
  12. Ju.F. Huravlev - M.V. Kuznetsov - V.A. Gubanov; XPS analysis of adsorption of oxygen molecules on the surface of Ti and TiNx films in vacuum. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, Vol 38, 169-176, 1992. No. public. 208, http://www.lasurface.com/database/liaisonxps.php?bib=208
  13. T. Ször ́enyi, L.D. Laude, I. Bert ́oti, Z. K ́antor, Z. Geretovszky, J. Appl.Phys.78, 6211 (1995)
  14. A. Casagrande, A. Glisenti, E. Lanzoni, E. Tondello, L. Mirenghi, M. Casarin, R. Bertoncello (1992), Surface and Interface Analysis (Vol 18).
  15. T.L. Barr; The nature of the relative bonding chemistry in zeolites: an XPS study. Journal Phys. Chem., Vol 10, 760-765, Dec 1990. No. public. 191, http://www.lasurface.com/database/liaisonxps.php?bib=191
  16. B. Vincent Crist, Ph.D.; Handbook of The Elements and Native Oxides, XPS International, Inc,3408 Emerald Drive, Ames, Iowa, 50010 USA. anuary 1999.
  17. Wagner,CD., Zatko,D.A., Raymond,RH. Anal.Chern.52,1445(1980).
  18. Haycock, D.E., Nicholls, e.J., Drch, D.S., Webber, M.J., Wiech, G. l. Chern. Soc. Dalton Trans., 1791 (1978).
  19. Ling Wang, Guorui Yang, Shengjie Peng, Jianan Wang,Dongxiao Ji, Wei Yan, Seeram Ramakrishna; Fabrication of MgTiO3 nanofibers by electrospinning and their photocatalytic water splitting activity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (2017) 25882-25890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.194
  20. Ni Zhang, Huiyuan Xue and Rongrong Hu; The activity and stability of CeO2@CaO catalysts to produce biodiesel. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018; Adv., 2018, 8, 32922–32929. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06884d
  21. Phase Equilibria Diagrams Database (NIST Standard Reference Database 31), The American Ceramic Society and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014. Figure Number 92-003; www.nist.gov/srd/nist31.cfm
More
ScholarVision Creations