AgNPs were synthesized with a 58–458 nm range in size from the leaf extract of
Mukia maderaspatana [49][53].
Pedalium murex was also reported to synthesize AgNPs by Anandalakshmi et al.
[50][54]. The TEM micrographs revealed that the produced AgNPs were circular with a mean value of 50 nm. Raju et al.
[51][55] utilized living peanut plants to synthesize AgNPs. The TEM examination showed that the biosynthesized AgNPs were of different shapes (spherical, hexagonal, triangular, square and rod-shaped) and sizes. Most of the formed AgNPs were spherical and 56 nm in average size. The EDX technique confirmed that the formed NPs were of silver. Some reports on plant-assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles are enlisted below in
Table 1.
Table 1. Plant-assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles.
Plant Name |
Parts Used |
Size (nm) |
Shapes |
Reference |
and PdCl
2. After stirring the mixture of PdCl
2 + extract at 90 °C for 2 h, the colour changed from pale yellow to dark brown, indicating the production of PdNPs, validated by UV–visible spectroscopy. A TEM monograph revealed the particle size of the obtained Pd nanoparticles ranged between 20 nm and 25 nm. The particle size of the synthesized NPs was found to be between 10 nm and 50 nm. The biosynthesis of Pd nanoparticles from the leafy solution of
Glycine max has been reported
[167][171]. The shape of the particles was found to be uniformly spherical with a 15 nm diameter, which was confirmed by TEM micrograph. Jia et al.
[168][172] performed the synthesis of Pd nanoparticles utilizing
Gardenia jasminoides extract containing various antioxidants such as geniposide, crocins, crocetin and chlorogenic acid, which reduce and stabilize the nanoparticles. There are some reports on plant-assisted synthesis of palladium nanoparticles listed below in
Table 5.
Table 5. Plant-assisted synthesis of palladium nanoparticles.
Plant Name |
Parts Used |
Morinda citrifolia L. |
Leaves, fruit pulp, seeds |
3–11 |
Spherical |
[52][56] |
Nymphae odorata |
Leaves |
15 ± 5 |
Spherical |
[53][57] |
, etc. The synthesis of TiO
2 nanoparticles on a wide scale using biological methods has stimulated the interest of researchers due to its low cost, environmental friendliness and reproducibility. Nowadays, there are many reports on the biosynthesis of TiO
2 nanoparticles by using microbes (such as bacteria and fungi), algae, plant parts and enzymes. The aqueous extract of
Eclipta prostrata produce nanoparticles with a spherical shape and sizes ranging from 36 nm to 68 nm, confirmed by XRD and TEM analysis
[139][143]. Subhashini and Nachiyar
[140][144] used the leaf extract of
Albizia saman for the production of titanium NPs via a green route. The aqueous TiO
2 solution was added dropwise into the leaf extract with stirring at 50 °C resulting in the formation of anatase crystals of TiO
2 nanoparticles. The synthesized TiO
2 nanoparticles were found to be 41 nm in size and confirmed by XRD analysis. Jalill et al.
[141][145] synthesized the anatase form of TiO
2 nanoparticles by using the plant extract of
Curcuma longa (because of its terpenoid and flavonoid contents). The nanoparticles that were developed were identified by the techniques of XRD, FTIR, SEM and EDX that revealed the aggregated, circular structure and a particle size of 160–220 nm. TiNPs were synthesized by the utilization of herbal extract (as a bio-reductant) of
Echinacea purpurea [142][146]. The particle size of the synthesized TiO
2 nanoparticles was found to be in the 120 nm range. The leaf extract of
Psidium guajava includes alcohol and primary and aromatic amines, which aid in producing TiO
2 nanoparticles. Some reports on the plant-assisted synthesis of titanium nanoparticles are listed below in
Table 4.
Table 4. Plant-assisted synthesis of titanium nanoparticles.
Plant Name |
Parts Used |
Size (nm) |
Shapes |
Reference |
Size (nm) |
Shapes |
Reference |
Ledebouria revoluta |
Bulb |
47 |
Tetragonal |
[ |
Peganum harmala |
Seed | 143 | ] | [147] |
22.5 ± 5.7 |
Euphorbia hirta |
Spherical |
[ | 169 | ] | [173] |
Pouteria campechiana |
Coleus amboinicus | Leaves |
73–140 |
LeavesSpherical |
[144][148] |
Capparis zeylanica |
Leaves |
23 |
Spherical |
[54][58] |
Caesalpinia pulcherrima |
Leaves |
9 |
Spherical |
[55][59] |
Carya illinoinensis |
Leaves |
12–30 |
Spherical |
[56][60] |
Mentha piperita |
Leaves extract |
35 |
Spherical |
[57][61] |
Jatropha curcas |
Latex |
10–20 |
Face-centered cubic |
[58][62] |
Acalypha indica |
Leaves extract |
20–30 |
Spherical |
[59][63] |
Hibiscus rosa sinensis |
Leaves |
14 |
Spherical/prism |
[60][64 |
[77][81], tea leaf extract can be employed in gold NP preparation. Suman et al.
[78][82] synthesize gold NPs of size range 8–17 nm from the root extracts of
Morinda citrifolia at ambient temperature. The biogenic production of gold nanoparticles exploiting
Nyctanthes arbortristis alcoholic extract led to the creation of spherical-shaped nanostructures of size 19.8 ± 5.0 nm
[79][83]. The synthesis of AuNPs was reported with Bael (
Aegle marmelos) leaves and the particles obtained were round and 4–10 nm in size
[80][84].
Lee et al.
[34][38] performed the synthesis of AuNPs from the peel aqueous extract of
Garcinia mangostana. The aqueous solution of gold in contact with
G. mangostana extract was reduced to gold metal ions and synthesized AuNPs. The FTIR results suggested that the reducing agent found in the aqueous solution of
G. mangostana is strongly associated with anthocyanins, benzophenones, flavonoids and phenols. The synthesized AuNPs were spherical with a size range of 32.96 ± 5.25 nm that was analyzed by TEM. Rodríguez-León et al.
[81][85] synthesized AuNPs from the bark extract of
Mimosa tenuiflora at different metallic (acting as precursor) concentrations.
AuNPs were made from the aqueous suspension of
Azadirachta indica [82][86]. When the
A. indica extract was mixed with Au(III) solution, the nanoparticle formation commenced. Kasthuri et al.
[83][87] constructed gold nanoparticles with triangular and hexagonal shapes from HAuCl
4 solution and a diluted extract possessing phyllanthin (derived from
Phyllanthus amarus). Aromal and Philip
[84][88] synthesized AuNPs using
Benincasa hispida seed extract as either a reducing or capping agent. Carboxylic groups (COOH) found in the plant extract change to COO
- during the reduction process. The protein’s COOH group works as a surfactant, adhering to the surface of the AuNPs and then stabilizing AuNPs via electrostatic stabilization. The synthesized AuNPs were observed to have a crystalline nature and were 10–30 nm in size. Some reports on the plant-assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles are listed below in
Table 2.
Table 2. Plant-assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
Plant Name |
Parts Used |
Size (nm) |
Shapes |
Reference |
Parkia biglobosa |
Leaves |
1–35 |
Truncated, pentagonal, spherical, triangular |
[35][39] |
Curcuma pseudomontana |
Rhizome |
20 |
40–50Spherical |
[ |
Spherical85][89] |
[ | 170 | ] | [ |
Lawsonia inermis |
Leaves |
20 |
Spherical |
174 | ] |
Syzygium cuminiLeaves | [ | 86][90] |
20–50 |
Spherical |
[ | 112 | ][116] |
Leaves |
Anogeissus latifolia | 22 |
Spherical round |
[ |
Gum ghatti |
4.8 ± 1.6 |
Spherical145][149] |
[171][175] |
Cinnamon |
Bark |
35 |
Eucalyptus globulesSpherical |
Leaves[ |
52–7087 |
Mentha arvensis |
Leaves | Spherical, elongated | ] | [91] |
[ | 104 | ] | [ | 108] |
20–70 |
Spherical |
[ | 146 | ][ |
Filicium decipiens |
Leaves | 150 |
2–22 | ] |
Spherical |
[172][ |
Croton Caudatus Geisel |
Leaves |
20 |
Spherical |
[ |
Tecoma castanifolia13]] |
176 | ] |
Leaves |
70–75 |
Cinnamomum camphora | Spherical |
[ | 113 | ] |
Leaves |
3.2–6 |
Multiple[117] |
Azadirachta indica |
Leaves |
15–50 |
[ | 173][177] |
Tamarind |
Zingiber officinaleLeaves |
20–40 |
Triangle |
[32] |
Pulicariaglutinosa | Root |
Leaves |
3–5 | [36] |
30–50 |
Spherical |
[114][118] |
Spherical |
[ | 166 | ] |
Azadirachta indica |
Leaves |
50 |
Spindle shaped |
[115][119] |
Spherical |
[ | 147 | ] | [151] |
Cycas |
Psidium guajava |
Leaves |
32.58 |
Spherical |
[148][152] |
[170] |
Aloe vera |
Plant extract |
50/350 |
Crystalline |
[88][92 |
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis | ] |
Leaves |
Musa paradisica | 100–150, 100–200 |
Cubic, crystalline, Spherical |
[ |
Peeled banana149 |
50][153] |
Crystalline |
[174][178 |
Leaves |
] |
Mentha, Ocimum, Eucalyptus |
Leaves |
3–16 |
Spherical |
Catharanthus roseus |
Leaves |
23–57[89 |
Spherical |
Calotropis gigantea |
Flower | ] | [ |
10–5293] |
[ | 116 | ] | [ | 120] |
Crystalline, Spherical oval |
[ | 150 | ] | [154] |
Cinnamom zeylanicum |
Bark |
15–20 |
Crystalline |
[165][169] |
Canna indica, Quisqualis indica |
Leaves and flower |
30–130 |
Solanum nigrumPolymorphic/stable |
Leaves[ |
20–30 |
Salvia officinalis |
Leaves | Hexagonal |
15–20 | [117] |
Spherical[121] |
[ | 136 | ] | [ | 140] |
2–6 |
Catharanthus roseus |
Leaves |
38 |
Spherical |
[175][179] |
Spherical |
[42][46] |
90 | ] | [ | 94 | ] |
Murraya koenigii |
Leaves |
20 |
Spherical |
[91][95] |
Olea europea |
Leaves |
18–30 |
Crystalline |
[118] |
Curcuma longa | [ | 122 | ] |
Solanum trilobatum |
Leaves |
70 |
Spherical, oval |
[151][ |
Tuber155] |
10–15 |
Spherical |
[176][180] |
Ceratonia siliqua |
Leaves extract |
5–40 |
Azadirachta indica |
LeavesSpherical |
Aegle marmelos |
Leaves | [ |
4–10 |
Glycine max | 61 | ] |
Leaves25Spherical | [ |
Crystalline65] |
[ |
[ | 119 | ] | [123] |
Azadirachta indica |
Leaves |
124 | 80 | ] |
Spherical[84] |
[152][156] |
15 |
Spherical |
[167][171] |
Suaeda monoica |
Leaves |
31 |
Spherical |
[62 |
Plant extract |
6–60 |
Anisotropic |
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis |
Flowers |
12–32 |
Crystalline | ] |
[120][124] |
Annona squamosal |
Leaves |
40–60 |
Spherical | [66] |
Catharanthtus roseus |
Leaves |
35–55 |
Rosa hybrid |
Rose petals |
10 |
Cubic |
[92 |
[153][ |
[93 |
157 | ] |
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis |
LeavesCubical |
[47] |
30–35] |
Crystal, spongy[51] |
[ | 97 | ] |
[ | 121 | ] | [ |
Jatropha curcas, citrus aurantium | 125 | ] |
Leaves |
25–50 |
Spherical |
[154 |
Ocimum sanctum |
Leaves extract |
10–20 |
Spherical |
[63][67] |
] | [ | 96 | ] | [158 |
Momordica charantia |
Fruit |
30–40 |
Cubical |
] |
Ruta graveolens |
Stem | [ |
2894] |
Jatropha curcas |
Latex | Spherical |
25–50 | [98] |
Ocimum tenuiflorum |
[ |
Leaves |
25–40 |
Spherical |
[64][68] |
] |
Spherical, uneven | 102 | ] | [106] |
[155][159] |
Phyllanthus amarus |
Leaves |
65–99 |
Cubic |
[95][ |
Aloe vera |
Leaves |
Euphorbia prostrata |
Leaves | 22.18 |
81–84 | 99 |
Hexagonal] |
[ | 122 | ] | [ | 126] |
Spherical |
[156][160] |
Ginkgo biloba |
Leaves |
15–500 |
Cubic |
[65 |
Mangifera indica][69] |
Leaves |
17–20 |
Spherical |
[ | 96][ |
Citrus sinensis | 100 | ] |
Ocimum tenuiflorum |
Leaves |
11–25 |
Hexagonal |
Fruit peel |
19 |
Tetragonal[ |
Tanacetum vulgare |
Terminalia chebula | 123 | ] | [ | 127Fruit |
16 |
Stevia rebaudiana |
Leaves |
8–20Spherical |
[66][70] |
Octahedral |
[ | 97 | ] | [101] |
Argemone mexicana |
Leaves extract |
Nyctanthes arbortristis |
Flower extract | 30 |
Spherical, hexagonal |
[ |
19.867 |
Spherical, hexagonal][71] |
[ | 79 | ] | [ | 83] |
Sesuvium portulacastrum |
Callus extract |
5–20 |
Spherical |
Trigonella foneum-graecum |
Leaves |
15–25 | [ | 68][72] |
Spherical |
[ | 75 | ] | [79] |
Syzygium cumini |
Leaves and seed |
29–92 |
Spherical |
[45][69 |
Tanacetum vulgare | ] | [ |
Fruit | 49,73] |
11 |
Triangular |
[ | 66 | ][70] |
Cinnamomum camphora |
Sun dried leaves |
3.2–20 |
Cubic hexagonal crystalline |
[70][74] |
Cuminum cyminum |
Seeds |
1–10 |
Spherical |
[98][102] |
Melia azedarach |
Leaves |
78 |
Spherical |
[71][75] |
Rhododedendron dauricam |
Sorbus aucuparia |
Leaf extract |
16–18 |
Spherical, triangular, hexagonal |
[99][103] |
2.4. Zinc Nanoparticles
Zinc oxide (ZnO) is an inorganic metal oxide with a vast range of nanostructures. Zinc nanoparticles (ZnNPs) have gained considerable attention due to their low cost, large surface area, white appearance, UV-filtering, antifungal, antibacterial and photochemical properties, and high catalytic activity
[100][101][104,105]. There are several reports of ZnO nanoparticle synthesis using various plant extracts
[102][103][104][105][106,107,108,109]. Plant extracts contain some phytochemicals (i.e., polyphenols, saponins, terpenoids) that act as reducing and stabilizing agents in the reaction system. Phytochemicals are synthesized in the plant parts, including root, stem, leaf, fruit and seed. These phytochemicals lower the metal’s valence to zero, then calcinate it to add oxide. Additionally, zinc ions interact with the polyphenols in the plant extract to form a complex. After that, zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)
2) is formed via hydrolysis, and then ZnO nanoparticles are synthesized after complex calculations
[106][110].
During the literature survey, it was observed that members of the Fabaceae, Rutaceae, Apocynaceae, Solanaceae and Lamiaceae families are most commonly employed for the production of ZnNPs (
Table 3). Plants from the family Lamiaceae, such as
Anisochilus carnosus,
Plectranthus amboinicus and
Vitex negundo were used to produce ZnO nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes, including hexagonal, spherical, quasi-spherical and rod-shaped particles. The findings indicated that the particle sizes decrease when plant extract concentration increases
[107][108][111,112]. All experiments displayed nanoparticles in the same size range with spherical and hexagonal disc shapes, which XRD and TEM analysis characterized. Singh et al.
[109][113] synthesized ZnO NPs using
Calotropis procera latex that were spherical and 5 nm to 40 nm in size. Ramesh et al.
[110][114] used the floral extract of
Cassia auriculata to react with Zn(NO
3)
2 solution resulting in the development of ZnNPs with a particle size ranging from 110 nm to 280 nm. Some reports on the plant-assisted synthesis of zinc nanoparticles are listed below in
Table 3.
Table 3. Plant-assisted synthesis of zinc nanoparticles.
Plant Name |
Parts Used |
Size (nm) |
Shapes |
Reference |
Artemisia pallens |
Leaves along with stem |
50–100 |
Hexagonal |
[105][109] |
Cayratia pedata |
Leaves |
52.24 |
Spherical |
[111][115] |
] |
[ |
157 |
] |
[ |
161 |
] |
Sargassum muticum |
Leaves |
30–57 |
Hexagonal |
[ | 124 | ][128] |
Calotropis gigantea |
Leaves |
1.5–8.5 |
Spherical |
[103][107] |
Beta vulgaris |
Root |
52–76 |
Hexagonal |
[125][129] |
[ | 131 | ] |
Artocarpus gomezianus |
Fruit |
50 |
Spherical |
[128][132] |
Senna auriculata |
Leaves |
2 |
Spherical |
[129][133] |
Brassica oleraceae |
Leaves |
1–100 |
Spherical and sheet shaped |
[130 |
Cassia auriculata |
Leaves |
38 |
Spherical |
[158][162] |
Ocimum basilicum |
Leaves |
50 |
Hexagonal |
[159][163] |
Hibiscus-rosa-sinensis |
Petals |
7–24 |
Spherical |
[12] |
Curcuma longa |
Root |
20–80 |
Hexagonal |
[126][ |
Erythrina variegates |
Leaves | 130 |
39 | ] |
Flower extract |
25–40 |
Spherical |
Crystalline, spherical |
[ | 160 | ] | [164] |
Nephelium lappaceum |
Peel |
20 |
Spherical |
[127[72][76] |
Lippia citriodora |
Leaves extract |
15–30 |
Crystalline |
[73][77] |
] | [ | 134 | ] |
Tribulus terrestris |
Fruit |
16–28 |
Spherical |
[40][44] |
] |
Acalypha Indica |
Leaves |
100–200 |
Cube |
Citrullusm colocynthis |
Leaves |
31 |
Spherical |
[74][78] |
2.3. Gold Nanoparticles
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are the most appealing new metal NPs due to their remarkable uses in catalysis, gene expression, nonlinear optics, nanoelectronics and disease diagnostics fields
[75][79]. Gold nanoparticles made using either phytochemicals or other extract constituents are stable for a limited period
[76][80]. According to Sharma et al.
131 |
] |
[ |
135 |
] |
Plectranthus amboinicus |
Leaves |
20–50 |
Crystalline |
[ |
132 |
] |
[ |
136 |
] |
Coptidis rhizome |
Rhizome |
2.9–25.2 |
Spherical and rod shaped |
[ | 133 | ][137] |
Ginger |
Rhizome |
23–26 |
Crystalline |
[134][138] |
2.5. Titanium Nanoparticles
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiNPs) have drawn great attention because of their appropriate electrical band structure, high specific surface area and quantum efficacy, stability, and chemical innerness
[135][139]. TiNPs have a wide applicability in lowering the toxicity of synthetic dyes
[136][140] and pharmaceutical medicines
[137][141], wastewater treatment
[138][142]
2.6. Palladium Nanoparticles
The major studies of most researchers were focused on the biological synthesis of palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) via plant materials because it is cost-effective, sustainable, and human- and eco-friendly. Plant extracts contain a number of primary and secondary metabolites that transform metal (Pd) salts to PdNPs. Siddiqi and Husen
[161][165] reported that the shape, size and stability of PdNPs depends on concentrations of plant extract, pH, temperature and incubation time. Plant sources including the extracts of leaves, flowers, seeds, fruits, peels and roots were extensively utilized to synthesize Pd nanoparticles.
Gurunathan et al.
[162][166] synthesized Pd nanoparticles from a plant extract of
Evolvulus alsinoides. This plant extract has various natural antioxidants, including alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannin, steroids and phenol, which work as reducing and capping tools to synthesize Pd nanoparticles. Nasrollahzadeh et al.
[163][167] used the leaf extract of
Hippophae rhamnoides to synthesize PdNPs because the leaf extract has polyphenols that play an important role as reducing and capping agents for nanostructure development. The formed NPs were found to be spherically shaped and ranging from 2.5 nm to 14 nm, which was confirmed by TEM. Pd nanoparticles have been synthesized from the root extract of
Salvadora persica, which contains polyphenols that act as reductant and stabilizing agents
[164][168]. The average particle size of synthesized NPs was 10 nm at 90°C, which was revealed from the UV spectrum of the colloidal solution. Palladium NPs were generated with the bark extract of
Cinnamomum zeylanicum and PdCl
2 solution at 30 °C
[165][169]. Khan et al.
[166][170] carried out the plant-assisted synthesis of PdNPs from the extract of
Pulicaria glutinosa