Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a proliferative disorder of the prostate gland arising from its epithelial cells and smooth muscle within the transitional zone. Prostatitis is a common urologic condition that in 1999 was subdivided into four categories—acute bacterial prostatitis, chronic bacterial prostatitis, chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), and asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections affecting women. Benign prostatic hyperplasia, urolithiasis, recurrent urinary tract infections, and chronic prostatitis are diseases that are commonly diagnosed worldwide. Carotenoids, including lycopene, are widely available in fruits and vegetables, and it is postulated that they can be used in the prevention and treatment of benign urological conditions.
1. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Prostate growth is induced by androgen stimulation and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), produced from testosterone by 5-alpha-reductase, which is a hormone that primes this phenomenon
[1][44].
After lifestyle modifications, which are a first-line treatment in mildly symptomatic disease, administration of medications is the mainstay in the treatment of most men with symptomatic BPH. For this purpose, two drug classes, i.e., 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and Alpha-blockers have been adopted as the standard of care
[2][45]. As these drugs are not free of adverse events, including a loss of libido, erectile dysfunction
[3][46], and dizziness
[4][47], it is advisable to seek alternative methods to treat and prevent BPH.
Lycopene appears to reach high levels in the prostate and human semen
[5][6][48,49]. However, the mechanism itself by which lycopene is accumulated in prostatic tissue and excreted into semen remains unknown. High concentration levels of lycopene in prostatic tissue are linked with the prevention of pathologies, such as BPH. These actions are thought to be mediated through various mechanisms, including the inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase expression
[7][50].
1.1. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Epidemiological Studies
The largest observational study, which primarily focused on dietary patterns and BPH occurrence, was performed by Tavani et al., who included 2820 men. Of this number, 1369 suffered from BPH. The authors concluded that the risk of BPH significantly decreased with an increasing intake of carotene, vitamin C, and iron. The intake of lycopene or zeaxanthin did not impact BPH incidence. These results contradict those of interventional studies conducted so far. However, as the authors noted, no uniform case definition of the disease has been established and only surgically treated men with BPH were included, which is a potential reason for the lack of dependency between lycopene consumption and BPH prevalence
[8][51].
Kristal et al. examined dietary risk factors for incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in 4770 Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial placebo-arm participants who were free of BPH at baseline. BPH was assessed in this group of men over a 7-year period. The authors found that a dietary pattern low in vegetables and protein, and high in fat and red meat, was associated with the development of symptomatic BPH. There was also a weak association between lycopene, zinc, and supplemental vitamin D intake and decreased BPH occurrence
[9][52].
1.2. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Experimental Studies
A few in vitro studies have shown that lycopene inhibits the proliferation of benign prostate epithelial cells
[10][53] and suppresses inflammatory cascade
[11][54]. The mechanism responsible for this effect might be the inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase and basal inflammatory signaling, assessed in benign prostate tissue of rats. However, a study performed by Herzog et al. did not show the influence of lycopene administration on prostate growth in young rats
[12][21].
An experimental model showed that a combination of Selenium (Se), Serenoa Repens (SeR), and Lycopene (Ly) effectively reduces oxidative stress, prostate inflammatory response, and histological features
[11][54]. Another study performed by Minutoli et al. also investigated the influence of SeR, Se, and Ly on the microscopic effects of supplementation on BPH tissue. Administering SeR, Se, and Ly significantly blunted prostate growth. Moreover, the combination of SeR–Se–Ly was most effective in reducing prostate enlargement and growth by 43.3% in treated animals
[13][55].
Both in vitro and clinical studies indicate that lycopene potentially inhibits BPH progression. Kim et al. administered 30 mg of lycopene per day for three weeks before radical prostatectomy to 32 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa). Later on, they investigated the impact of lycopene consumption on histopathological changes found in prostate specimens assessed post-surgically. They revealed that lycopene induced apoptosis in cancer-free BPH tissue. Apoptosis affected both epithelial and myoepithelial cells
[14][56].
Lycopene was not the only carotenoid that demonstrates antioxidant properties tested in pre-clinical trials aimed at BPH treatment. Hou et al. investigated astaxanthin (AST) in the BPH rat model. They studied the effects of tested carotenoid on prostate weights, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels depending on the dose of the administered substance (20 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg). The most pronounced decline in prostate weights was observed after delivering 80 mg/kg of AST, while noticeable changes in hormone levels and SOD activity started from the administered dosage of 40 mg/kg; they concluded that AST has an inhibitory effect on testosterone-induced rats
[15][57].
2. Prostatitis
Chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) accounts for 90–95% of all prostatitis cases. Patients usually report symptoms of discomfort in the pelvis, genital, and suprapubic area, urinary symptoms, and sexual dysfunction
[16][64].
The etiopathogenesis of CPPS is still unclear. Since no invading infectious agent has been identified, many hypotheses have been put forward to explain the CPPS etiopathogenesis. They include defective urothelial integrity and function, autoimmune triggered inflammation state, endocrine imbalances, pelvic floor muscle spasm, peripheral and central sensitization, and psychosocial conditions
[17][65]. In the latest research performed by Zhou et al., increased oxidative stress and oxidative damage induced by chronic bacterial prostatitis were found in patients, and such phenomena were closely related to the course of the disease
[18][66].
CPPS is considered a challenge in outpatient clinics. As conventional treatment of CPPS seems hardly effective, more attention has been paid to alternative treatments, including carotenoid therapy.
2.1. Prostatitis Experimental Studies
The suppressive effect of antioxidant supplement (Prosta-Q) on inflammatory processes in prostatitis was assessed by Shahed et al. The product includes zinc, quercetin, cranberry, saw palmetto, bromelain, and papain. It is speculated that oxidative stress may be a key pathway in some men with CPPS, which can be targeted with antioxidant therapy
[19][67]. Lycopene, which downregulates inflammatory regulators such as cytokines, enzymes, and transcription factors in cell culture systems
[20][68], is also known to decrease expression markers for immune cell infiltration in rats’ prostate tissue
[12][21].
The synergistic effect of chronic bladder pain (CBP) treatment with lycopene and fluoroquinolones was demonstrated by Han et al. Their analysis of microbiological cultures of the prostate and urine as well as histological findings showed that the addition of lycopene to antibiotic treatment is associated with a statistically significant decrease in bacterial growth and improved prostatic inflammation compared with the ciprofloxacin group
[21][69].
Morgia et al. evaluated the efficacy of the SeR–Se–LY combination in reducing chronic inflammation in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or prostate intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation (PIN/ASAP). This was a multicenter study involving nine Italian urological centers between January 2009 and December 2010. The influence of the test substances on the inflammatory state was measured by histo-biochemical methods. The anti-inflammatory effects were indirectly measured by evaluating the density of T-cells (CD3, CD8), B-cells (CD20), and macrophages (CD68). At the six-month follow-up, there were statistically significant reductions of extension and grading of inflammatory infiltration, mean values of CD20, CD3, and CD68, and mean PSA value in a group of patients with chronic prostatic inflammation taking SeR–Se–LY compared with the control group. It was concluded that patients with bladder outlet obstruction could benefit from this therapy acting on the inflammatory component of BPH
[22][70].
2.2. Prostatitis Clinical Studies
The effects of SeR–Se–LY on IIIa CPPS were compared to Serenoa repens alone in a randomized study performed by Morgia et al. After eight weeks of treatment, S. repens + selenium and lycopene were found to ameliorate symptoms associated with chronic prostatitis, providing significant improvement in voiding dysfunctions compared to S. repens alone. As the treatment was safe and well tolerated, the authors pointed out its usefulness when long-term therapy is required
[23][71].
Cai et al. assessed the influence of adding Serenoa repens, selenium, lycopene, bromelain, and methyl-sulfonyl-methane extracts to standard levofloxacin therapy for chronic bacterial prostatitis. They found that combination therapy had a significant effect on all three evaluated scores (QoL, NIH-CPSI, and IPSS) compared to antibiotic treatment alone. Moreover, as the authors pointed out, no adverse drug reactions have led to high compliance with the experimental protocol
[24][72].
Based on evidence from observational and experimental studies, lycopene shows therapeutic activity against chronic prostatitis. Although its effect was assessed as a support to standard antibiotic treatment, the results of the studies are encouraging. Taking into account chronicity and the recurrent nature of the disease, which demands long-term drug usage, carotenoid supplementation seems to be a reasonable choice for such patients (Table 12).
Table 12. Characteristics of studies on chronic prostatitis treatment in which lycopene was used as a solitary drug or in combination with other substances.
Study |
Year |
Studied Population |
Intervention |
Results |
Ref. |
Cai et al. |
2016 |
79 patients suffering from CBP |
The participants were assigned to one of two groups: Group A taking levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for two weeks with lycopene and methylsulfonylmethane addition; Group B receiving only the antibiotic |
In group A there was a significant improvement in NIH-CPSI (−17.6 ± 2.65) and IPSS (−12.2 ± 2.33) scores versus Group B (mean difference: −9 ± 1.82; −8.33 ± 1.71, respectively) |
[24] | [72] |
Morgia et al. |
2010 |
102 patients suffering from IIIa CP/CPPS, aged 23–49 years |
Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: group A receiving Profluss ( | S. repens | , selenium, and lycopene) or group B taking | S. repens | alone for two months |
The NIH-CPSI score significantly improved ( | p | < 0.001) in both groups; the decrease in IPSS score and improvement in the maximum peak flow rate was seen in both arms, but was more pronounced in group A. The decrease of PSA and WBC count ( | p | < 0.007) was only reported in group A |
[23] | [71] |
Morgia et al. |
2013 |
168 patients suffering from BPH submitted to prostate biopsy for PCa suspicion. Two additional cores were taken for PCI evaluation |
The first group consisted of 108 participants with histological diagnosis of PCI randomized to Profluss group (I) or to control group (Ic). The second group consisted of 60 participants with histological diagnosis of BPH, randomized to Profluss + α-blocker treatment group (II) or to the control group (IIc) |
Alleviation of inflammatory state, decrease in mean values of interleukins (CD20, CD3, CD68), and mean PSA levels in group I compared to group Ic. The extension and grading of inflammatory state in group II were also decreased compared to IIc, but not statistically significantly. A statistically significant difference in interleukin levels (CD20, CD3, CD68, CD8) was reported in group II compared to IIc |
[22] | [70] |