Salmonella spp. were found in nine out of 40 articles (22.5%). Lettuce samples were observed to be highly contaminated with
Salmonella spp. followed by coriander, spinach, parsley, and sprouts. More than 100,000 samples of various types of fresh produce were investigated in the United States from 2002 to 2012, resulting in the detection of
Salmonella spp. in 51 different serotypes of 152 samples
[27]. Of the 51
Salmonella serotypes, 10 were resistant to different antibiotics
[27]. The identified
Salmonella serotypes were Oranienburg, Montevideo, Agona, Havana, Thompson, Poona, Kentucky, Tucson, Veneziana and one was unknown, with Tucson being the more prevalent. Antibiotic-resistant
Salmonella serotypes Thompson, Poona, and Kentucky, were found on lettuce samples (23.1%), whereas the Oranienburg serotype was found on cantaloupe sample (6.7%)
[27]. Another study in Malaysia isolated multidrug-resistant
S. enteritidis from carrots that were resistant to AMP, AMX, trimethoprim (TMP) nalidixic acid (NA), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), and chloramphenicol (CHL)
[28]. In a study in Thailand,
S. Stanley, S. Schwarzengrund and
S. Rissen were isolated from lettuce samples, among which
S. Schwarzengrund was resistant to AMP, CHL, NA, while
S. Rissen was resistant to AMP, SXT and TET, and
S. Stanley was resistant to NA
[29]. Two studies in Malaysia found other
Salmonella serotypes, such as
S. Corvallis, S. Typhimurium and
S. Enteritidis, detected from leafy vegetables, water dropwort, and long bean samples, which were accordingly resistant to multiple antibiotics
[9][30]. A study in Mexico observed multidrug-resistant
Salmonella in lettuce and carrot samples with resistance to AMP, cephalotin (CHT), CHL, TET, CIP, NA, streptomycin (STR), and SXT
[31]. Resistance profiles of
Salmonella isolates varied between studies and could not be compared, due to the detection of different serotypes. However, most of the studies (87.5%) found
Salmonella isolates to be resistant to AMP.
Eight out of 40 articles (20%) reported the detection of
Pseudomonas spp. in produce samples, and six of these studies reported isolates resistant to AMP.
Pseudomonas spp. were frequently recovered from lettuce, carrots, and spinach. A study in Jamaica found that, among 88
P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from 95 vegetable samples, all were resistant to imipenem (IMP) (100%), followed by 97% to GEN, 93% to CIP, and 79% to CAZ
[32].
Other ARBs that were often detected on leafy and non-leafy vegetables, fruits, and sprouts, were
B. cereus,
Enterobacter spp.
[33] and
Listeria spp. (predominantly
L. monocytogenes), Rahnella aquatilis [34],
Staphylococcus spp.,
Shigella spp. and
Citrobacter spp. In addition,
Acinetobacter spp. (predominantly
A.
baumannii),
Sphingobacterium multivorum, Pseudomonas putida, Erwinia persicina, Pantoea agglomerans, Serratia fonticola, and
Enterococcus spp.
(E. faecalis and
E. casseliflavus) were also found on fresh produce.
Rahnella aquatilis was infrequently isolated from spinach, whereas
Listeria spp. was isolated from carrot and cabbage samples.
Enterococcus spp. were also detected on produce. A study that tested 112 fruit samples in the USA found 16% of samples contaminated with enterococci
[35]. Another study conducted in Germany found that all
B. cereus strains isolated from 137 fresh vegetables were resistant against PEN G and CTX, and 99.3% were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC)
[36]. For
Enterobacter spp., one study in South Africa found that
E. cloacae isolated from spinach, tomato and cucumber were resistant to aminoglycoside, CHL and TET, whereas another study from Italy reported
E. cloacae strains isolated from frisée salad and RTE salad were resistant to AMP, AMC and CTX
[26][37]. Two studies reported penicillin resistant
L. monocytogenes in fresh produce, one in Malaysia which showed all 58
L. monocytogenes strains isolated from 301 vegetable samples were resistant to PEN G and 71% (
n = 41) of isolates were resistant to meropenem
[28]. Another study conducted in Brazil found that
L. monocytogenes from raw and RTE salad vegetable samples were resistant to PEN G and TET
[38]. RTE salads consisting of leafy and non-leafy vegetables without salad dressings were contaminated with antibiotic-resistant
E. coli [21][26][39],
K. pneumoniae [39],
L. monocytogenes [38],
E. faecalis and
E. faecium [40] and
E. cloacae [26].
3. Antibiotic Resistance Genes on Fresh Produce
Ten articles presented findings on ARGs. Of these, seven studies detected ARGs in
E. coli isolated from fresh produce. For instance, a study conducted in the Czech Republic detected the ampicillin resistance gene
blaTEM, and tetracycline resistance genes
tetA and
tetB in
E. coli isolated from asparagus, rucola, leek and raddish samples
[41]. In a study from China, plasmid-mediated mobile colistin resistance (
mcr-1) gene was detected in
E. coli isolated from an apple sample, which also carried ten more resistance genes including
aadA2, aadA1, floR, cmlA1, sul2, sul3, tetA, tetM, dfrA12, mdfA [42].
Mcr-1 positive
E. coli were also isolated from carrot, pak choi, lettuce, tomato, spinach and cucumber, and were resistant to colistin (CST), AMP, GEN, NA, TET, CIP, cefotaxime (CTX), kanamycin (KAN), levofloxacin (LVX), doxycycline (DOX) and fosfomycin (FOS)
[43][44][45]. A study in the Czech Republic found that the majority of
E. coli isolates (13 of 15) from 108 raw vegetable samples were positive for one or multiple ARGs, including
qac, sul1, tetA, int, sul1, sul3, mer and
tetB [10]. One study in Germany reported that 7 out of 245 vegetable samples were positive for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing
E. coli, and all ESBL-producing isolates were positive for
blaCTX-M genes conferring resistance to third generation cephalosporins (3GC)
[11].
ESBL-producing
K. pneumoniae recovered from vegetable and fruit samples in Algeria were positive for multiple beta-lactamase genes, including
blaCTX-M-15,
blaOXA-1, and
bla SHV-101, as well as genes that confer resistance to sulfonamides (
sul1, sul2), tetracyclines (
tetA), fluoroquinolones (
qnrS1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66), trimethoprim (
dfrA12, dfrA14), aminoglycosides (
aph(3′)-Ia, aadA2, strB, strA, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-IIa), phenicols (
catA2) and macrolides lincosamides streptogramins (MLS) (
mph(A))
[24]. In addition, a study in China found that
K. pneumoniae isolated from an orange sample was positive for nine ARGs, including
mcr-1, blaSHV-110,
qnrS1 and
fosA6 [42].
Pseudomonas spp. harboring two ESBL-genes,
blaTEM-116 and
blaSHV-12, were detected from vegetable samples in a Japanese study
[8].
4. Potential for Adverse Health Outcomes from the Consumption of Fresh Produce Contaminated with ARB/ARGs
Researchers found 25 articles that discussed health risks from consuming fresh produce contaminated with pathogens resistant to one or more antibiotics. However, the articles did not conduct any risk assessment of potential foodborne diseases due to the consumption of contaminated fresh produce. Instead, these articles broadly mentioned that consuming raw or minimally processed leafy and non-leafy vegetables can be a potential source of foodborne illnesses and invasive bacterial diseases. Moreover, the consumption of contaminated vegetables without any heat treatment or cooking may allow ARB to survive in the food, and reach the human gastrointestinal passage. Multiple studies reported that raw produce could be a vector for transmitting ARGs to the human commensal intestinal flora
[21][26][38][39][40]. One article mentioned that the consumption of raw vegetables contaminated with multidrug-resistant pathogens such as
Klebsiella pneumoniae increased the risk of sharing ARGs (ESBL/AmpC gene) with resident microorganisms in the gut by horizontal gene transfer
[24]. Another article mentioned that
Rahnella aquatilis, P. agglomerans, E. cloacae, and
C. freundii might contribute to the spread of ARGs to resident bacteria
[26]. The public health risks associated with exposure to ARB, especially 3GC-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae are diverse, ranging from risk of difficult-to-treat diseases, to colonization and asymptomatic carriage, to mere passage through human intestines by environmental species
[6][10]. Only three articles discussed the fact that gut colonization by resistant bacteria can pose a risk of complicated infection among infants, the elderly or individuals with weakened immune systems
[24][30][36].
Diarrheagenic
E. coli strains isolated from contaminated cucumber, lettuce and spinach were found to cause diarrhoea and other foodborne gastrointestinal diseases
[21]. Consumption of contaminated fruits was also associated with diarrhea diseases, and enterotoxigenic
E. coli positive for heat-stable enterotoxin-1 gene
astA was identified as a causative agent
[42]. Another article pointed out that the presence of the mobile colistin resistance (mcr 1) gene in
E. coli isolates from lettuce samples is a serious public health concern, considering that colistin is a last-resort antibiotic used for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Similarly,
Salmonella infection (salmonellosis) is one of the consequences of consuming fresh leafy vegetables reported in a study conducted in Malaysia
[9]. Both
S. Weltevreden and
S. Paratyphi were isolated from leafy vegetables.
S. Weltevreden causes diarrhoea in tropical regions of low-income countries, and
Salmonella Paratyphi B. also causes enteric fever and gastroenteritis in humans
[9]. A few articles (3 out of 40) mentioned that the emergence of drug resistant
Salmonella infections linked with the consumption of raw vegetables is alarming since multidrug resistance limits the effectiveness of therapeutic treatments
[28][30][46].
Antibiotic resistance in
E. coli is of particular concern because it is the most common Gram-negative bacterial pathogen causing intestinal and extra-intestinal infections in humans
[47]. Apart from Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, fresh produce contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria, such as
Listeria spp. and
Staphylococcus spp. could be potential sources of foodborne illnesses
[46]. Listeriosis caused by
L. monocytogenes is dangerous for vulnerable individuals; pregnant women and their fetuses, the young, and the elderly, are susceptible to invasive listeriosis, with fatality rates ranging between 20% and 40%
[38]. Moreover, uncooked vegetables contaminated with
P. agglomerans, P. fluorescens and
Rahnella aquatilis could be possible sources of nosocomial infections in vulnerable patients in the hospital
[26].
5. Pathways of Contamination of Fresh Produce with ARB
Researchers found 22 articles that discussed the potential pathways of contamination of fresh produce with ARB. The most common pathways included cross-contamination both during the pre- and post-harvesting periods.
Sources of fresh produce contamination with bacterial pathogens during pre-harvesting are diverse, including but not limited to, soils, irrigation water, or animal manure.
E. coli, Salmonella spp. and
Staphylococcus spp. have been detected in agricultural soils
[42].
Pseudomonas species, due to their presence in environmental reservoirs (e.g., soil and water), are frequently found on vegetables. Leafy and non-leafy vegetables such as carrots are at high risk of contamination with soil-borne bacteria, either from the natural microbiota of the soil, or the manure fertilizer used in soil
[32]. Untreated animal manure was the most common cause of pre-harvest spread of ARB in fresh produce
[9][12][23][40][41][48]. Leafy vegetables such as parsley and water spinach that grow around swamps or riverbanks can be contaminated with wastewater released into these waterbodies by industries, slaughterhouses, or processing plants
[9]. Runoff from cattle farms which contains ARB and ARGs, due to the heavy use of antibiotics in animal feed and treatment, may contaminate irrigation water, which can subsequently transfer ARB to fresh produce. Treated or untreated municipal wastewater is used for irrigation in many parts of the world; the absence of wastewater treatment facilities is a major reason for using untreated wastewater in agricultural farms in low-income countries, increasing the potential risk of contamination of produce with ARB
[21].
Improper handling of fresh produce during post-harvest processing, including cutting, washing or sanitizing, transporting, packaging or storing, can also create opportunities for microbial cross-contamination [8][26]. The use of contaminated water during post-harvest washing, and the reuse of wash water, were mentioned as reasons for the contamination of fresh produce with bacterial pathogens [41]. Presence of contaminated soil particles that remain as residues on the fresh produce after harvest were mentioned as a potential source of contamination of vegetables with Arcobacter spp. [48]. Poor hygiene and sanitation practices of food handlers are often overlooked when it comes to handling vegetables and fruits in retail markets, although these can also be major sources of contamination [42]. One article mentioned that Staphylococcal contamination of fresh produce has been linked to carriage in nasal cavities of infected food handlers, or agricultural workers [49]. L. monocytogenes from animal foods can also cross-contaminate fresh produce during processing or display at marketplaces [38].