Encyclopedia
The HIV-1 integrase enzyme (IN) plays a critical role in the viral life cycle by integrating the reverse-transcribed viral DNA into the host chromosome. This function of IN has been well studied, and the knowledge gained has informed the design of small molecule inhibitors that now form key components of antiretroviral therapy regimens. Recent discoveries unveiled that IN has an under-studied yet equally vital second function in HIV-1 replication. This involves IN binding to the viral RNA genome in virions, which is necessary for proper virion maturation and morphogenesis. Herein we describe these two functions of IN within the context of the HIV-1 life cycle, how IN binding to the viral genome is coordinated by the major structural protein, Gag, and discuss the value of targeting the second role of IN in virion morphogenesis.
- HIV-1
- integrase
- maturation
- integrase-RNA interactions
- protein-RNA interactions
1. Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the causative agent of AIDS, and since its discovery in 1983 [1][2] has become one of the leading causes of the death worldwide due to infectious disease. Intensive study of the HIV-1 life cycle has led to the identification of viral enzymes essential for virus replication, and antiretroviral compounds that specifically inhibit the functions of these enzymes have transformed HIV-1 infection from a death sentence into a manageable disease. The HIV-1 integrase enzyme (IN) plays a vital role in the viral life cycle by catalyzing the integration of viral DNA into the host chromosome. This function has been successfully targeted by a class of antiretrovirals known as integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) [3]. Four FDA-approved INSTIs, raltegravir [4], elvitegravir [5], dolutegravir [6], and bictegravir [7], have become key components of anti-retroviral therapy regimens and are both highly effective and well tolerated ([8][9][10], reviewed in [11]). A fifth, cabotegravir [12], is currently in late stage clinical trials. However, despite high barriers with the second-generation INSTIs, treatment does select for drug resistance [13][14][15], and mutations conferring resistance to multiple INSTIs have been reported in clinical settings [16][17], highlighting the need for continued research and development of both improved and novel antiretroviral compounds.
2. Overview of the HIV-1 Life Cycle
Figure 1). The viral genome inside the core exists in the form of a viral ribonucleoprotein complex (vRNP) bound and condensed by the viral nucleocapsid (NC) protein, and associated with RT and IN enzymes [19]. The viral core itself is enclosed within the viral lipid envelope derived from the host cell plasma membrane. The surface of the virion is studded with the viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein trimers (reviewed in [20]). During viral entry, the Env glycoproteins engage the CD4 receptor and CXCR4/CCR5 coreceptors on the target cell, which induces a series of conformational changes in Env, resulting in membrane fusion and release of the viral core into the cytoplasm (reviewed in [21][22]).
Figure 1.
After entry, the viral core is transported towards the nucleus along microtubules [23][24] and reverse transcription ensues (
Figure 1). During this stage, the core undergoes an uncoating process in which the capsid disassembles and CA monomers are shed from the lattice (reviewed in [25]). While uncoating and reverse transcription have long been thought to occur in the cytoplasm, recent studies have provided evidence that these processes are not completed until after nuclear entry [26][27]. Notwithstanding, the timing and degree of uncoating is critical for completion of reverse transcription. Several mutations in CA can destabilize the CA lattice, resulting in severe defects in reverse transcription [28][29][30][31], presumably due to premature degradation of the core components, including IN [32]. IN remains associated with the reverse transcription complex, and following completion of cDNA synthesis, a multimer of IN binds to both ends of the linear viral DNA to form the intasome, or the stable synaptic complex. The reverse transcription complex is actively transported into the nucleus through the nuclear pore complexes involving Nup 358, Nup 153, as well as CPSF6 (reviewed in [33][34]), and upon entering the nucleus IN catalyzes the integration of the viral DNA into the host cell chromosome (reviewed in [35]).
Figure 1). This viral transcript can remain unspliced or undergo a complex series of splicing events (reviewed in [36]). Fully spliced HIV-1 mRNAs code for the regulatory Tat, Rev, and Nef proteins and are exported from the nucleus via the NXF1/NXT1 pathway (reviewed in [37][38][39]). Partially spliced mRNAs code for the viral envelope Env and accessory proteins Vif, Vpr, and Vpu, while the unspliced full-length HIV-1 mRNAs can be packaged into virions as the genomic RNA or translated to generate the major structural protein, Gag, and the frameshifting variant Gag–Pol polyprotein [40][41], which additionally codes for the replicative enzymes protease (PR), RT, and IN (reviewed in [37][38][39]). Both partially spliced and unspliced HIV-1 RNAs are retained in the nucleus until they can be exported by the viral Rev protein [42][43] through a CRM1-dependent pathway [44][45][46].
Unspliced dimeric vRNA is trafficked to the plasma membrane by Gag, and this complex subsequently nucleates the assembly of nascent virions (reviewed in [47][48][49],
Figure 1). During this process, the Gag and Gag–Pol polyproteins polymerize around the vRNA, acquire Env glycoproteins recruited to the budding site, and virions bud off from the infected cell in an immature state. During or shortly after budding, the virion undergoes a maturation process in which the Gag and Gag–Pol polyproteins are cleaved into separate mature proteins by the virally encoded PR enzyme. This triggers a structural rearrangement within the virion, whereby the cleaved NC proteins condense the vRNA together with RT and IN to form the vRNP, the viral CA lattice assembles around the vRNP, and the now mature virion is ready to infect a new target cell and reinitiate the viral life cycle (reviewed in [47][48]).
3. Role of Integrase in Particle Morphogenesis
While integration is the canonical function of IN, early mutagenesis studies indicated that IN may also play a role in other aspects of virus replication. In particular, a group of IN substitutions referred to as class II IN mutations lead to pleiotropic effects in HIV-1 replication, including defects in particle assembly [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], morphogenesis [18][50][53][59][60][61][64][65], and reverse transcription in target cells [18][66][50][55][57][58][59][61][63][64][65][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82], in some cases without impacting IN catalytic function in vitro [83][53][54][57][58][68][69][72][74][84][85]. When visualized using electron microscopy, class II IN mutant viruses generate particles with vRNP complexes mislocalized outside the capsid lattice [18][50][53][59][60][61][64][65]. A similar phenotype was noted in IN-deleted viruses [60], again suggesting that IN is necessary for proper virion morphogenesis. Such aberrant viral particles are generally referred to as “eccentric particles,” due to the mislocalization of the vRNPs outside the capsid lattice, and are morphologically distinct from immature virions.
While integration is the canonical function of IN, early mutagenesis studies indicated that IN may also play a role in other aspects of virus replication. In particular, a group of IN substitutions referred to as class II IN mutations lead to pleiotropic effects in HIV-1 replication, including defects in particle assembly [57,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161], morphogenesis [18,57,151,157,158,159,162,163], and reverse transcription in target cells [18,56,57,153,155,156,157,159,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179], in some cases without impacting IN catalytic function in vitro [55,151,152,155,156,165,166,169,171,180,181]. When visualized using electron microscopy, class II IN mutant viruses generate particles with vRNP complexes mislocalized outside the capsid lattice [18,57,151,157,158,159,162,163]. A similar phenotype was noted in IN-deleted viruses [158], again suggesting that IN is necessary for proper virion morphogenesis. Such aberrant viral particles are generally referred to as “eccentric particles,” due to the mislocalization of the vRNPs outside the capsid lattice, and are morphologically distinct from immature virions.Surprisingly, it was recently discovered that treatment of virus-producing cells with a class of 2-(quinolin-3-yl) acetic acid derivatives known as allosteric IN inhibitors (ALLINIs) (also called noncatalytic IN inhibitors (NCINIs), lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75-IN inhibitors (LEDGINs), IN-LEDGF/p75 allosteric inhibitors (INLAIs), or multimeric IN inhibitors (MINIs)) results in generation of particles with eccentric morphologies [64][65][86][87]. ALLINIs were originally designed to prevent integration by interfering with IN binding to the cellular cofactor, lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/p75), important for targeting the viral pre-integration complex to the host chromosome [88]. The compounds compete with LEDGF binding to IN by engaging the V-shaped binding pocket created by the catalytic core domain of two IN dimers in the intasome complex [65][88][89][90][91][92][93]. In addition to preventing IN–LEDGF interactions, ALLINIs also prevent integration in a LEDGF-independent manner by inducing aberrant IN multimerization, locking IN in catalytically inactive multimers that are unable to assemble on viral DNA and carry out the integration reaction (reviewed in [89][93]). However, subsequent studies found that many ALLINIs are more potent when added to producer cells, and that they inhibit viral replication at the later stages of the viral life cycle [65][86][87][91][92]. Specifically, treatment with ALLINIs interferes with virion morphogenesis and leads to the generation of eccentric viral particles with vRNPs mislocalized outside the capsid lattice, strikingly similar to those generated by class II IN mutations [65][86][87][91][94]. Similar to the mechanism by which they can prevent integration, ALLINIs are proposed to interfere with virion morphogenesis by inducing aberrant IN multimerization, and mutations that confer resistance to ALLINIs also prevent ALLINI-induced IN multimerization [86][95]. Many class II IN mutations also alter IN multimerization [96][84][97][98], suggesting that proper multimerization is important for IN’s function during virion morphogenesis. However, a defined mechanism by which IN ensures viral RNA is correctly packaged inside the capsid lattice remained elusive for many years.
Surprisingly, it was recently discovered that treatment of virus-producing cells with a class of 2-(quinolin-3-yl) acetic acid derivatives known as allosteric IN inhibitors (ALLINIs) (also called noncatalytic IN inhibitors (NCINIs), lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75-IN inhibitors (LEDGINs), IN-LEDGF/p75 allosteric inhibitors (INLAIs), or multimeric IN inhibitors (MINIs)) results in generation of particles with eccentric morphologies [162,163,182,183]. ALLINIs were originally designed to prevent integration by interfering with IN binding to the cellular cofactor, lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/p75), important for targeting the viral pre-integration complex to the host chromosome [184]. The compounds compete with LEDGF binding to IN by engaging the V-shaped binding pocket created by the catalytic core domain of two IN dimers in the intasome complex [163,184,185,186,187,188,189]. In addition to preventing IN–LEDGF interactions, ALLINIs also prevent integration in a LEDGF-independent manner by inducing aberrant IN multimerization, locking IN in catalytically inactive multimers that are unable to assemble on viral DNA and carry out the integration reaction (reviewed in [185,189]). However, subsequent studies found that many ALLINIs are more potent when added to producer cells, and that they inhibit viral replication at the later stages of the viral life cycle [163,182,183,186,187,188]. Specifically, treatment with ALLINIs interferes with virion morphogenesis and leads to the generation of eccentric viral particles with vRNPs mislocalized outside the capsid lattice, strikingly similar to those generated by class II IN mutations [163,182,183,187,190]. Similar to the mechanism by which they can prevent integration, ALLINIs are proposed to interfere with virion morphogenesis by inducing aberrant IN multimerization, and mutations that confer resistance to ALLINIs also prevent ALLINI-induced IN multimerization [182,191]. Many class II IN mutations also alter IN multimerization [76,180,192,193], suggesting that proper multimerization is important for IN’s function during virion morphogenesis. However, a defined mechanism by which IN ensures viral RNA is correctly packaged inside the capsid lattice remained elusive for many years.A seminal study in 2016 revealed that IN binds viral genomic RNA in mature virions, and that IN–RNA binding is necessary for viral replication [18]. Crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (CLIP-seq), an approach that captures protein–RNA interactions in relevant physiological settings [99], was instrumental in this discovery and demonstrated that IN binds the HIV-1 genome at discrete sites with a distinct binding pattern from that of NC. IN not only binds RNA, but also modulates RNA structure in vitro by bridging multiple RNA molecules together [18]. Several basic residues in the IN CTD, K264, K266, and K273, directly interact with RNA, and substitutions at these positions abolish IN–RNA binding in virions. Importantly, virus production in the presence of ALLINIs, BI-D and BI-B2, also prevented IN–RNA binding, likely through aberrant IN multimerization as detailed below [18]. Finally, inhibiting IN interactions with RNA, either by introducing mutations at the CTD binding site or by ALLINI treatment, leads to the generation of eccentric, non-infectious viral particles (
A seminal study in 2016 revealed that IN binds viral genomic RNA in mature virions, and that IN–RNA binding is necessary for viral replication [18]. Crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (CLIP-seq), an approach that captures protein–RNA interactions in relevant physiological settings [140], was instrumental in this discovery and demonstrated that IN binds the HIV-1 genome at discrete sites with a distinct binding pattern from that of NC. IN not only binds RNA, but also modulates RNA structure in vitro by bridging multiple RNA molecules together [18]. Several basic residues in the IN CTD, K264, K266, and K273, directly interact with RNA, and substitutions at these positions abolish IN–RNA binding in virions. Importantly, virus production in the presence of ALLINIs, BI-D and BI-B2, also prevented IN–RNA binding, likely through aberrant IN multimerization as detailed below [18]. Finally, inhibiting IN interactions with RNA, either by introducing mutations at the CTD binding site or by ALLINI treatment, leads to the generation of eccentric, non-infectious viral particles (Figure 2) with vRNPs mislocalized outside of the core [18].
3) with vRNPs mislocalized outside of the core [18].
Figure 23.
Recent characterization of the effects of class II IN mutations on IN–RNA binding, IN multimerization, and virion morphology has revealed that all of the class II IN substitutions examined compromise IN–RNA binding and lead to the generation of eccentric viral particles [94]. IN–RNA binding was prevented by one of three distinct mechanisms: reducing IN levels in virions and precluding formation of IN–RNA complexes, directly preventing IN–RNA binding without substantially affecting IN levels or IN multimerization, but most commonly through adversely affecting functional IN multimerization and indirectly impairing IN–RNA binding. In vitro, IN binds RNA as tetramers, and class II IN mutant proteins that form predominantly dimers have a reduced affinity for RNA. The mutations cause an even greater defect in the ability of IN to bridge multiple RNA molecules, suggesting that although IN dimers may be able to weakly bind RNA, IN must form tetramers to bind RNA with high affinity and recruit additional viral RNA molecules, as would possibly occur when viral RNA is condensed and placed within the core during maturation. Taken together, these recent findings argue that proper IN multimerization is likely a prerequisite for IN–RNA binding in virions and is important to IN’s function in virion morphogenesis. The identification of multiple mechanisms responsible for the loss of IN–RNA binding helps answer how multiple IN substitutions can cause the same phenotype and strengthens the conclusion that IN–RNA interactions account for the key role of IN in virion morphogenesis [94].
Recent characterization of the effects of class II IN mutations on IN–RNA binding, IN multimerization, and virion morphology has revealed that all of the class II IN substitutions examined compromise IN–RNA binding and lead to the generation of eccentric viral particles [190]. IN–RNA binding was prevented by one of three distinct mechanisms: reducing IN levels in virions and precluding formation of IN–RNA complexes, directly preventing IN–RNA binding without substantially affecting IN levels or IN multimerization, but most commonly through adversely affecting functional IN multimerization and indirectly impairing IN–RNA binding. In vitro, IN binds RNA as tetramers, and class II IN mutant proteins that form predominantly dimers have a reduced affinity for RNA. The mutations cause an even greater defect in the ability of IN to bridge multiple RNA molecules, suggesting that although IN dimers may be able to weakly bind RNA, IN must form tetramers to bind RNA with high affinity and recruit additional viral RNA molecules, as would possibly occur when viral RNA is condensed and placed within the core during maturation. Taken together, these recent findings argue that proper IN multimerization is likely a prerequisite for IN–RNA binding in virions and is important to IN’s function in virion morphogenesis. The identification of multiple mechanisms responsible for the loss of IN–RNA binding helps answer how multiple IN substitutions can cause the same phenotype and strengthens the conclusion that IN–RNA interactions account for the key role of IN in virion morphogenesis [190].Whether IN plays a similar role during virion maturation in other retroviruses has yet to be studied. Although the process of maturation is relatively conserved across different retroviruses, there is considerable diversity in particle and core morphologies [100][101][102]. Interestingly, mutations in the C-terminus of the murine leukemia virus (MLV) IN cause defects in reverse transcription reminiscent of those caused by class II IN mutations in HIV-1 [103][104]. More studies are needed to determine if this defect is the result of aberrant virion morphology, or if IN–RNA interaction is required for proper virion morphology.
Whether IN plays a similar role during virion maturation in other retroviruses has yet to be studied. Although the process of maturation is relatively conserved across different retroviruses, there is considerable diversity in particle and core morphologies [147,194,195]. Interestingly, mutations in the C-terminus of the murine leukemia virus (MLV) IN cause defects in reverse transcription reminiscent of those caused by class II IN mutations in HIV-1 [196,197]. More studies are needed to determine if this defect is the result of aberrant virion morphology, or if IN–RNA interaction is required for proper virion morphology.4. Therapeutic Outlook and Conclusions
Currently, all clinically approved IN inhibitors share a common mode of action and target the strand-transfer reaction during integration, making viral cross-resistance a problem. Therefore, there has long been interest in targeting alternative functions of IN, and its vital role during virion morphogenesis has become an attractive drug target. While not initially designed to interfere with viral particle maturation, many ALLINIs lead to the generation of eccentric viral particles in addition to inhibiting integration [18]. This dual-mode of action allows these compounds to retain antiviral activity even when viral resistance develops to one mode of action [105], and gives ALLINIs a distinct and non-overlapping resistance profile with INSTIs [106][107]. While resistance mutations do arise to ALLINIs, they are accompanied by a viral fitness cost. Importantly, mutations that confer resistance to ALLINIs can disrupt virion morphogenesis themselves, and compensatory mutations are required to overcome this defect [108], indicating a high barrier to resistance. Several compounds are currently in clinical trials after demonstrating favorable bioavailability, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics, and with more in development, ALLINIs are a promising new class of antiretrovirals.
Currently, all clinically approved IN inhibitors share a common mode of action and target the strand-transfer reaction during integration, making viral cross-resistance a problem. Therefore, there has long been interest in targeting alternative functions of IN, and its vital role during virion morphogenesis has become an attractive drug target. While not initially designed to interfere with viral particle maturation, many ALLINIs lead to the generation of eccentric viral particles in addition to inhibiting integration [18]. This dual-mode of action allows these compounds to retain antiviral activity even when viral resistance develops to one mode of action [217], and gives ALLINIs a distinct and non-overlapping resistance profile with INSTIs [218,219]. While resistance mutations do arise to ALLINIs, they are accompanied by a viral fitness cost. Importantly, mutations that confer resistance to ALLINIs can disrupt virion morphogenesis themselves, and compensatory mutations are required to overcome this defect [220], indicating a high barrier to resistance. Several compounds are currently in clinical trials after demonstrating favorable bioavailability, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics, and with more in development, ALLINIs are a promising new class of antiretrovirals.CA has also emerged as a potential target for compounds designed to interfere with virion morphogenesis. Compounds that disrupt the stability of the capsid lattice and cause morphological defects in virions also block viral replication at or prior to reverse transcription [109][110], and they likely lead to the premature loss of vRNA and IN similar to how ALLINIs work. Two recent studies reported the effectiveness of a CA-targeting small molecule compounds in vivo, both in a humanized mouse model [111] and in humans [112]. Both compounds demonstrated potent and sustained antiviral activity in vitro, with no measurable cross-resistance with other antiretroviral drugs [112]. While it is important to note that these compounds led to morphological aberrations in virions by accelerating CA assembly rather than destabilizing it and appear to exert their antiviral effects primarily by preventing the nuclear import of viral DNA, they still highlight the importance of proper capsid assembly to viral replication and the value of interfering with virion morphogenesis as a therapeutic strategy.
CA has also emerged as a potential target for compounds designed to interfere with virion morphogenesis. Compounds that disrupt the stability of the capsid lattice and cause morphological defects in virions also block viral replication at or prior to reverse transcription [204,221], and they likely lead to the premature loss of vRNA and IN similar to how ALLINIs work. Two recent studies reported the effectiveness of a CA-targeting small molecule compounds in vivo, both in a humanized mouse model [222] and in humans [223]. Both compounds demonstrated potent and sustained antiviral activity in vitro, with no measurable cross-resistance with other antiretroviral drugs [223]. While it is important to note that these compounds led to morphological aberrations in virions by accelerating CA assembly rather than destabilizing it and appear to exert their antiviral effects primarily by preventing the nuclear import of viral DNA, they still highlight the importance of proper capsid assembly to viral replication and the value of interfering with virion morphogenesis as a therapeutic strategy. In conclusion, virion morphogenesis is a critical step in the HIV-1 life cycle, and the discovery that IN plays a key role in this process opens up new doors for therapeutic interventions. IN is crucial for ensuring that the viral RNA genome is packaged inside of the capsid lattice in virions, and interfering with this function of IN leads to morphological defects that prevent further viral replication. Small molecule compounds that exert this effect can complement existing antiretroviral compounds already in the clinic, and when used in combination with INSTIs could further raise the barrier to drug resistance. Destabilizing the viral capsid by targeting CA has similar effects on viral replication, and is also a viable therapeutic strategy. A better understanding of the events surrounding virion morphogenesis will be important to help guide the design of future therapeutics.
