COVID-19 infections resulting in pathological kidney manifestations have frequently been reported in adults since the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019. Gradually, there have been an increased number of COVID-19-associated intrinsic kidney pathologies in children and adolescents reported as well. The pathophysiological mechanisms between COVID-19 and the onset of kidney pathology are not fully known in children; it remains a challenge to distinguish between intrinsic kidney pathologies that were caused directly by COVID-19 viral invasion, and cases which occurred as a result of multisystem inflammatory syndrome due to the infection.
Author(s) and Country of Report | Age (yrs) | Sex | Ethnicity | Comorbidities | New-onset or Relapse | Clinical Presentation |
Presentation Creatinine (mg/dL) | Presentation Proteinuria (g/day) |
Presentation Albumin (g/dL) | Haematuria | Kidney Biopsy | Treatment Received | Clinical Outcome | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alvarado et al. [10] Ecuador |
15 | M | Not Known | Nil | New-Onset | Anasarca, Dyspnoea, Oliguria |
0.55 | 3.9 | 1.5 | Nil | Not done as inpatient. To be scheduled as outpatient | Chloroquine and Azithromycin, daily boluses of methylprednisolone for 5 doses | Resolution of oedema | ||||||||||||||
Shah et al. [11] United States |
8 | M | Not Known | Nil | New-Onset | Facial swelling, pedal/scrotal oedema | 0.32 | 11.4 | 2 | Yes, 2+ blood on urinalysis | No | Oral Prednisolone and supportive treatment | Achieved remission, continued oral prednisolone on reporting | ||||||||||||||
Morreale et al. [12] Italy |
3 | Not Known | Italian, born to non-consanguineous parents | Nil | New-Onset | [Abdominal distension/lower limb oedema | Not Known | 0.4 | 1.6 | Nil | No | Oral Prednisolone, Intravenous Albumin on Day 1, Furosemide from Day 3 | 24Prednisolone and furosemide were gradually tapered with disease remission | ||||||||||||||
] France (2 patients) |
2 patients with positive COVID-19 RT-PCR results following kidney transplantation on day 2 and day 105, respectively, were described. Patient 1 had ESKD secondary to HUS, and received a deceased donor transplant. Patient 2 had CKDu, and also received a deceased donor transplant. Transplant kidney biopsy revealed <10% tubular interstitial infiltration in patient 1 and microcalcifications in patient 2. Both patients remained asymptomatic with the positive COVID-19 RT-PCR result. | Morgan et al. [13] United States |
5 | F | Not Known | Nil | New-Onset | Abdominal distension/ lower limb oedema | 0.27 | >12 | 2 | Nil | No | Intravenous albumin and furosemide for diuresis, oral vitamin D and oral corticosteroids | Achieved complete remission within 3 weeks of starting corticosteroids and urine protein was still negative after 6 weeks of therapy | ||||||||||||
Basalely et al. [14] United States |
Not Known | M | Hispanic | Steroid-sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome with infrequent relapses | Relapse | Anasarca | 0.5 | 18.7 | <2.0 | Moderate blood, 4–10 RBC, +hyaline casts | No | Received IV Abx. Blood Cultures +ve for Strep. Agalactiae, Stress-dose IV Hydrocortisone followed by oral Prednisolone, IV Albumin and IV Furosemide, prophylactic VTE treatment | Completed 10 days Abx treatment and 2 weeks of prophylactic VTE treatment alongside oral Prednisolone | ||||||||||||||
Enya et al. [15] Japan |
3 | M | Japanese | Nephrotic Syndrome, Family Hx of Familial Hyper- cholesterolemia |
Relapse | Eyelid oedema | 0.18 | 6.3 | 3.5 | Nil | No | Commenced on oral Prednisolone, otherwise supportive management | Achieved remission after a week of treatment | ||||||||||||||
Al-Yazidi et al. [16] Oman |
10 | M | Arabic (Oman) | Steroid-sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome | Relapse | Facial edema, abdominal distension | Not Known | Not Known | Not Known | Nil | No | Commenced on oral Prednisolone, and required albumin infusion | Tapering of oral Prednisolone dose with resolution of proteinuria | ||||||||||||||
Melgosa et al. [17] Spain (2 patients) |
2 patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with acute COVID-19 infection provoked a relapse of their nephrotic syndrome. Both patients recovered following administration of oral Prednisolone without complications. Data were not described for each of these 2 patients individually. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Krishnasamy et al. [18] India (11 patients) |
11 out of 24 patients with previous diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome developed relapse of their nephrotic syndrome following acute COVID-19 infection. Data and outcomes were not described for each of these 11 patients individually. |
Author and Country of Report | Age (yrs) | Sex | Ethnicity | Comorbidities | Pathology | New-Onset or Relapse | Presentation Creatinine (mg/dL) | Presentation Proteinuria (g/Day) | Presentation Albumin (g/dL) | RBC per High Powered Field | Kidney Biopsy | Treatment Received | Clinical Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Levenson et al. [22] United States |
16 | M | Black | Remote cerebrovascular accident, ESKD secondary to microscopic polyangitis (pANCA vasculitis), live-donor transplant recipient-previous acute antibody rejection |
Collapsing Glomerulopathy | New-Onset | 2.3 and increasing to 4.7 (baseline 1.5) |
17 | 1.2 | Nil | Yes | Acute discontinuation of MMF, required two doses of IV immunoglobulin supportive treatment otherwise | Recovery of graft function, discharged DI, MMF increased back to regular doses |
Daniel et al. [23] United States |
15 | F | Hispanic | ESKD secondary to decreased nephron mass. Patient received deceased donor kidney transplantation | T-cell-mediated rejection | New-Onset | 2.1 (baseline is 0.5) | 0.31 | 4 | 272 | Yes | Steroids and Bamlanvimab was administered as post COVID-19 therapy | Discharged with some recovery of graft function. |
Berteloot et al. |
Nephrotic syndrome appeared as the most frequently reported clinical presentation. Nephrotic syndrome is a common kidney pathology observed in children and adolescents, characterized by minimal change disease in the majority (more than 80%) [25,26]. It is defined by the inability to restrict urinary protein loss, due to alterations of perm-selectivity in the capillary walls of the glomerulus, as a result of podocyte injury. Nephrotic-range proteinuria is recognized as the equivalent of 3.5 g or more of protein identified from a 24-h urine sample collection (urine protein-creatinine ratio > 300 mg/mmol), and childhood nephrotic syndrome tends to be selective towards albuminuria [27]. In children and adolescents, approximately 95% of nephrotic syndrome presentations are idiopathic, with the remaining 5% secondary to causes such as viral diseases (e.g., Parvovirus B19, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B and C), inflammatory conditions (e.g., Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis) or rare conditions such as Amyloidosis and Henoch–Schonlein Purpura [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Although COVID-19-associated minimal-change nephrotic syndrome is increasingly reported, its epidemiology in comparison with those minimal change cases induced by other viral infections remains unclear at this point in time. The mechanisms of how COVID-19 might induce nephrotic syndrome have been postulated in several adult studies, but there is very limited data for comparison in children and adolescents. A study conducted in China by Su et al. [34], with post-mortem kidney biopsy samples, found SARS-CoV-2 virion particles in podocytes with effaced foot-processes, suggestive of direct podocytopathic injury. Another report found evidence of tubuloreticular inclusions, often a marker of viral replication and marked interferon production within endothelial cells in the glomerulus [35]. These results have been disputed, with suggestions that the ultrastructural histological findings were actually normal subcellular structures, such as clathrin-coated vesicles and multivesicular bodies [36,37]. An alternative perspective on the mechanism of COVID-19-induced nephrotic syndrome advocates that it is mediated by multiple immunological pathways. Results from basic science studies during the early days of the pandemic suggest tissue damage from SARS-CoV-2 virus is defined by the generation of a cytokine storm [38]. It is believed that podocytopathy can be triggered by the cytokine storm generating an immunological milieu with excessive production of Th2-generated cytokines. Though there are ethical controversies to consider, it was a limitation that there were no kidney biopsy-proven histopathologies from the nephrotic syndrome presentations reviewed. In steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, which represents almost 99% of all idiopathic nephrotic syndrome cases in children aged 1–12 years, kidney biopsy is not usually performed unless a child does not achieve remission following a 4-week course of steroids [39]. Mechanistic associations between COVID-19 infection and nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents may have been further ascertained with evaluation of kidney biopsy findings.
Nephrotic syndrome appeared as the most frequently reported clinical presentation. Nephrotic syndrome is a common kidney pathology observed in children and adolescents, characterized by minimal change disease in the majority (more than 80%) [25][26]. It is defined by the inability to restrict urinary protein loss, due to alterations of perm-selectivity in the capillary walls of the glomerulus, as a result of podocyte injury. Nephrotic-range proteinuria is recognized as the equivalent of 3.5 g or more of protein identified from a 24-h urine sample collection (urine protein-creatinine ratio > 300 mg/mmol), and childhood nephrotic syndrome tends to be selective towards albuminuria [27]. In children and adolescents, approximately 95% of nephrotic syndrome presentations are idiopathic, with the remaining 5% secondary to causes such as viral diseases (e.g., Parvovirus B19, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B and C), inflammatory conditions (e.g., Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis) or rare conditions such as Amyloidosis and Henoch–Schonlein Purpura [28][29][30][31][32][33]. Although COVID-19-associated minimal-change nephrotic syndrome is increasingly reported, its epidemiology in comparison with those minimal change cases induced by other viral infections remains unclear at this point in time. The mechanisms of how COVID-19 might induce nephrotic syndrome have been postulated in several adult studies, but there is very limited data for comparison in children and adolescents. A study conducted in China by Su et al. [34], with post-mortem kidney biopsy samples, found SARS-CoV-2 virion particles in podocytes with effaced foot-processes, suggestive of direct podocytopathic injury. Another report found evidence of tubuloreticular inclusions, often a marker of viral replication and marked interferon production within endothelial cells in the glomerulus [35]. These results have been disputed, with suggestions that the ultrastructural histological findings were actually normal subcellular structures, such as clathrin-coated vesicles and multivesicular bodies [36][37]. An alternative perspective on the mechanism of COVID-19-induced nephrotic syndrome advocates that it is mediated by multiple immunological pathways. Results from basic science studies during the early days of the pandemic suggest tissue damage from SARS-CoV-2 virus is defined by the generation of a cytokine storm [38]. It is believed that podocytopathy can be triggered by the cytokine storm generating an immunological milieu with excessive production of Th2-generated cytokines. Though there are ethical controversies to consider, it was a limitation that there were no kidney biopsy-proven histopathologies from the nephrotic syndrome presentations reviewed. In steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, which represents almost 99% of all idiopathic nephrotic syndrome cases in children aged 1–12 years, kidney biopsy is not usually performed unless a child does not achieve remission following a 4-week course of steroids [39]. Mechanistic associations between COVID-19 infection and nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents may have been further ascertained with evaluation of kidney biopsy findings.
Various glomerulonephritides have been reported in children and adolescents following COVID-19 infection. CG is a variant of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), characterized by glomerular tuft collapse, segmentally or globally [40][41][42]. CG has previously been reported to associate with multiple infections and inflammatory conditions, namely HIV and systemic lupus erythematous [43]. Previous reviews evaluating COVID-19 induced glomerular disease in adults suggest CG to be amongst the most prevalent histopathological presentations [3][44]. The pathogenesis of CG is currently believed to be a multifactorial process associated with both direct viral invasion of glomerular structures and cytokine release [45][46]. Adult individuals of Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, and those carrying the APOL1 high-risk genotype have been shown to be at higher risk of CG following acute COVID-19 infection, due to stimulation of interferon production encouraging APOL1 gene expression [45][46]. AKI secondary to acute necrotizing glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in acute COVID-19 infection is hypothesized to be caused by glomerular hypoperfusion and tubular necrosis, leading to fibrinoid necrosis within the glomerulus and arterial walls of the intrarenal vessels [47][48]. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, as part of the innate inflammatory process of acute COVID-19 infection, has been hypothesized to play a major role in ANCA antibody formation, by affecting an individual’s immunotolerance during the acute inflammatory state of COVID-19 infection [49]. It is proposed that NET formation is the ultimate source of presentation of MPO and proteinase 3 antigen within this context [49]. In addition, aHUS following COVID-19 infection is thought to be caused by a prothrombotic state, as a result of complement-mediated inflammation and thrombotic microangiopathy-associated processes [50][51]. Models of mice with complement 3 deficiency have shown reduced respiratory distress and pulmonary inflammation, after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), whilst Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection and elevated levels of C5a and C5a-9 complexes have also been previously demonstrated in mice models [52][53]. These limited findings provide evidence of the significant role played by the complement system in generating hyperinflammatory responses during coronavirus-associated infections. Further work needs to be conducted to validate the role of complement in COVID-19, and its correlation with the onset of thrombotic microangiopathies. Poorer outcomes following COVID-19 infection in children and adolescents with prior kidney transplantation are expected due to chronic immunosuppression and other co-existing co-morbidities, such as diabetes, mellitus and hypertension, now recognized as significant risk factors for mortality following acute COVID-19 infection [54][55][56]. Due to the lack of reported cases, the precise mechanisms of how acute COVID-19 infection causes kidney transplant rejection and other transplant-associated conditions in children and adolescents requires further exploration. The lack of reported cases may be attributed to the fact that during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, many children with transplanted kidneys were shielding with schools being closed. In our region, the North West of the UK, this has resulted in an extremely low incidence of COVID-19 within this population due to infrequent testing of COVID-19 status. There remain knowledge gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms associating intrinsic kidney pathologies and COVID-19 infection. Incomplete data regarding kidney histopathology due to limitations in performing kidney biopsy and other invasive investigations for many cases involving children and adolescents has contributed to this. There was a published case series of AKI presentations with proteinuria and hematuria in children and adolescents, following positive COVID-19 PCR results [57]. However, these cases were not included in our systematic review, due to the lack of diagnoses provided from these reports. In other instances, it is difficult to clearly delineate and distinguish the differences between intrinsic kidney pathology caused by MIS-C, and cases that result from a direct viral invasion from COVID-19. Questions remain regarding whether genuine cases of COVID-19 infection-related kidney disease have been missed due to mistimed testing. There have been cases where the appearance of new-onset kidney pathology could not be directly attributed to acute COVID-19 infection, although the patient’s clinical presentation and timeline supported the likelihood of COVID-19-associated illness [58]. Whilst the co-morbidity status of children and adolescents may associate with greater risks of developing these manifestations following COVID-19 infection, in particular for relapsed rather than new-onset kidney disease, further work is required to determine the mechanisms by which acute COVID-19 infection induces renal disease, and to what extent these presentations are impacted by the presence of other confounding factors. The variations in clinical and pathological intrinsic kidney manifestations are currently difficult to explain, due to the relative novelty and lack of case numbers.