Owner and Cat Relationship: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Esther Bouma.

This entry provides a short overview of the different ways cat owners describe the relationship with their cat, how this might relate to an antropomorphic view of (role of) the cat, which owner-and cat-related charateristics are related to such views and how different views are associated with different living environments of cats.  

  • domestic cats
  • relationship
  • family
  • child
  • friend
  • cat welfare
  • human–animal bond

1. Introduction

Pets can fill a relational void in owners’ lives or be an addition to human social support networks [1,2,3,4,5,6][1][2][3][4][5][6]. Previous research shows that pet owners bond with pets as they would with family members [7,8,9][7][8][9] and that pets can occupy similar social niches as partners, family members, and children [10,11,12,13][10][11][12][13]. Relationships with cats are often strong and long-term [14,15][14][15]. Cats are appreciated for their adaptability to small residences, independence, and (presumed) ease of care [15]. Although most felid species are basically solitary, cats have been successfully domesticated as companion animals [16,17,18][16][17][18] and domestic cats are even capable of living with other cats under the condition that enough resources are available [19]. Cats can fulfil their owner’s need for support, company, love and care [3,20,21,22,23,24,25,26][3][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, many cat owners describe the relationship with their cat in human terminologies such as family, friend, or child [27,28,29][27][28][29] which highlights the ‘human’ roles cats can have in their owner’s life. 
The human–animal bond is defined as ‘a mutually beneficial and dynamic relationship between people and other animals’ [30]. While many studies showed the beneficial effects of cats on their owners [31[31][32][33][34][35][36][37],32,33,34,35,36,37], the effect of owners on their cats has received less attention. If an owner’s anthropomorphic relationship perception is related to social expectations of the cat, this could influence the owner’s behavior towards the cat and its living environment. Anthropomorphism has been related to both negative [38,39,40][38][39][40] and positive [41,42,43,44][41][42][43][44] outcomes for animals. Anthropomorphism can influence feline welfare in a negative way when unrealistic expectations result in disappointment and misinterpretation of behavior results in punishment or inadequate care [45]. Anthropomorphic descriptions (such as family member, child, or friend) might be related to a higher tendency to interpret cat behavior from a ‘human’ point of reference, influenced by knowledge of human behavior and one’s own experiences [46,47][46][47] and may influence how owners handle their cats and arrange their living environment.

2. Characteristics of Owner and Cat

Previously, owners’ relationship satisfaction and level of attachment were found to be associated with an owner’s social (living) situation [25[25][48][49],59,60], gender [28[28][50][51],61,62], age [28[28][52],63], and educational level [28]. However, the social function of the cat, and hence the relationship perception of the owner, might not only be associated with characteristics of the owner but also by characteristics of the cat. The human–cat relationship can be directly influenced by the cat’s behavior. As mentioned by Ines et al. [64][53], social behaviors of the cat are of importance in both the development as well as the sustainment of the relationship. Several studies showed differences in owner-directed behaviors of cats depending on the owners’ age, gender, household composition [65[54][55][56],66,67], and breed of the cat [68][57]. Secondly, the human–cat relationship can indirectly be influenced by the cat’s appearance. Certain cat breeds (such as the Ragdoll, British Shorthair, and Persian) are often perceived as ‘cute’ due to their relatively small limbs and round faces. These ‘infant-like’ features can evoke innate feelings of protection, care, and affection [69,70,71][58][59][60]. Because of previous findings related to human–animal relationships and (possible higher need) for social support, companionship, care, and nurture, owners’ social living situation, gender, age, and educational level, as well as cat breed, are considered in this study.

3. Consequences for the Cat’s Living Environment

As mentioned, an owner’s influence on their cat’s living environment has not received as much attention as the other way around. Therefore, we examine three aspects of the cat’s living environment that are related to feline welfare and might differ depending on the owner’s relationship perception. We examine (a) outdoor access, (b) access to the owner’s bedroom and (c) care during the owner’s absence. First, access to the outdoors has both beneficial effects (e.g., less boredom and obesity) as well as risks (e.g., accidents, poisoning, infectious diseases (reviewed in Foreman-Worsley et al. [72][61]). In the Netherlands it is common for cats to have outdoor access (although often restricted in area or duration). The number of cats living in a household, the cat being a pedigree [72][61], and owner’s personality [73][62] are associated with allowing cats outside or not. Second, most cats thrive in a predictable, stable, and controllable environment [74,75][63][64]. Consistent access to the bedroom provides a cat with a continuously accessible place for a quiet nap or a safe hide out. A previous study in the Netherlands showed that two-thirds of pet cats are allowed in the bedroom [76][65]. Moreover, allowing a cat to sleep on one’s bed reflects a high level of intimacy. Previous research showed that cats are more often allowed to sleep with the owner when the owner is single or has no children [77][66] or when the owner is female [67,78][56][67]. Third, during a period of absence, owners need to make sure their cat is provided with water, food, and a clean litterbox. In the Netherlands, most owners leave their cats in the care of friends and neighbors. The quality of care might differ between neighbors, friends, and professional cat sitters. Some owners hire a professional cat sitter or bring their cat to a boarding facility. Although some cats do not seem to mind staying in an unfamiliar environment, most cats show less stress related behaviors in their own territory [79][68].

References

  1. Zasloff, R.L. Measuring attachment to companion animals: A dog is not a cat is not a bird. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 47, 43–48.
  2. Sable, P. Pets, attachment, and well-being across the life cycle. Soc. Work 1995, 40, 334–341.
  3. Stammbach, K.B.; Turner, D.C. Understanding the Human—Cat Relationship: Human Social Support or Attachment. Anthrozoös 1999, 12, 162–168.
  4. Cohen, S.P. Can pets function as family members? West. J. Nurs. Res. 2002, 24, 621–638.
  5. Hortulanus, R.; Machielse, A.; Meeuwesen, L. Social Isolation in Modern Society, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2006.
  6. Smolkovic, I.; Fajfar, M.; Mlinaric, V. Attachment to pets and interpersonal relationships: Can a four-legged friend replace a two-legged one? J. Eur. Psychol. Stud. 2012, 3, 15–23.
  7. Bodsworth, W.; Coleman, G.J. Child–companion animal attachment bonds in single and two-parent families. Anthrozoös 2001, 14, 216–223.
  8. Reynolds, T.E. Pet Bonding and Pet Bereavement as a Function of Culture and Gender Differences among Adolescents; University of Sarasota: Sarasota, FL, USA, 1999.
  9. Charles, N. ‘Animals Just Love You as You Are’: Experiencing Kinship across the Species Barrier. Sociology 2014, 48, 715–730.
  10. Greenebaum, J. It’s a dog’s life: Elevating status from pet to “fur baby” at yappy hour. Soc. Anim. 2004, 12, 117–135.
  11. Walsh, F. Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Fam. Process 2009, 48, 462–480.
  12. Evans-Wilday, A.S.; Hall, S.S.; Hogue, T.E.; Mills, D.S. Self-disclosure with dogs: Dog owners’ and non-dog owners’ willingness to disclose emotional topics. Anthrozoös 2018, 31, 353–366.
  13. Auster, C.J.; Auster-Gussman, L.J.; Carlson, E.C. Lancaster Pet Cemetery Memorial Plaques 1951–2018: An Analysis of Inscriptions. Anthrozoös 2020, 33, 261–283.
  14. Karsh, E.B.; Turner, D.C. The human-cat relationship. In The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour, 2nd ed.; Turner, D.C., Bateson, P., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 159–177.
  15. Feuerstein, N.L.; Terkel, J. Interrelationships of dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus L.) living under the same roof. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 113, 150–165.
  16. Driscoll, C.A.; Menotti-Raymond, M.; Roca, A.L.; Hupe, K.; Johnson, W.E.; Geffen, E.; Harley, E.H.; Delibes, M.; Pontier, D.; Kitchener, A.C.; et al. The Near East origin of cat domestication. Science 2007, 317, 519–523.
  17. Linseele, V.; van Neer, W.; Hendrickx, S. Evidence for early cat taming in Egypt. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 2081–2090.
  18. Vigne, J.D.; Guilaine, J.; Debue, K.; Haye, L.; Gérard, P. Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 2004, 304, 259.
  19. Cafazzo, S.; Natoli, E. The social function of tail up in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). Behav. Processes 2009, 80, 60–66.
  20. Bowlby, J. Attachment and loss. In Attachment and Loss: Volume II: Separation, Anxiety and Anger; The Hogarth Press: London, UK; The Institute of Psycho-Analysis: London, UK, 1973; pp. 1–429.
  21. Rynearson, E.K. Humans and pets and attachment. Br. J. Psychiatry 1978, 133, 550–555.
  22. Endenburg, N.; Bouw, J. Motives for acquiring companion animals. J. Econ. Psychol. 1994, 15, 191–206.
  23. Van Houtte, B.A.; Jarvis, P.A. The role of pets in preadolescent psychosocial development. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 1995, 16, 463–479.
  24. Holbrook, M.B.; Stephens, D.L.; Day, E.; Holbrook, S.M.; Strazar, G. A collective stereographic photo essay on key aspects of animal companionship: The truth about dogs and cats. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 2001, 1, 1–16.
  25. Hafen, M.; Rush, B.R.; Reisbig, A.M.J.; Mcdaniel, K.Z.; White, M.B. The role of family therapists in veterinary medicine: Opportunities for clinical services, education, and research. J. Marital. Fam. Ther. 2007, 33, 165–176.
  26. Johnson, E.; Volsche, S. COVID-19: Companion Animals Help People Cope during Government-Imposed Social Isolation. Soc. Anim. 2021, 29, 1–18.
  27. Arahori, M.; Kuroshima, H.; Hori, Y.; Takagi, S.; Chijiiwa, H.; Fujita, K. Owners’ view of their pets’ emotions, intellect, and mutual relationship: Cats and dogs compared. Behav. Process 2017, 141, 316–321.
  28. Martens, P.; Enders-Sleegers, M.; Walker, J.K. The emotional lives of companion animals: Attachment and subjective claims by owners of cats and dogs. Anthrozoös 2016, 291, 73–88.
  29. Johnson, E.A.; Portillo, A.J.; Bennett, N.E.; Gray, P.B. Exploring women’s oxytocin responses to interactions with their pet cats. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12393.
  30. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2001. Available online: https://www.avma.org/one-health/human-animal-bond (accessed on 9 June 2021).
  31. Kummer, H. On the value of social relationships to nonhuman primates: A heuristic scheme. Soc. Sci. Inf. 1978, 17, 687–705.
  32. Enders-Slegers, M.J. The meaning of companion animals: Qualitative analysis of the life histories of elderly dog and cat owners. In Companion Animals and Us: Exploring Relationships between People and Pets; Podberscek, A.L., Paul, E.S., Serpell, J.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 237–256.
  33. Serpell, J.A. Domestication and history of the cat. In The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour; Turner, D.C., Bateson, P., Bateson, P.P.G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 180–192.
  34. Allen, K.; Blascovich, J.; Mendes, W.B. Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends, and spouses: The truth about cats and dogs. Psychosom. Med. 2002, 64, 727–739.
  35. Bao, K.J.; Schreer, G. Pets and Happiness: Examining the Association between Pet Ownership and Wellbeing. Anthrozoos 2016, 29, 283–296.
  36. McConnell, A.R.; Lloyd, E.P.; Humphrey, B.T. We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing. Anthrozoos 2019, 32, 459–470.
  37. Wells, D.L. The state of research on human–animal relations: Implications for human health. Anthrozoös 2019, 32, 169–181.
  38. Serpell, J.A. Jealousy? or just hostility toward other dogs? The risks of jumping to conclusions. Anim. Sentience 2018, 3, 13.
  39. Horowitz, A.; Hecht, J. Looking at dogs: Moving from anthropocentrism to canid umwelt. In Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior: The Scientific Study of Canis Familiaris; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 201–219.
  40. Overall, K.L. Dogs aren’t jealous—they are just asking for accurate information Commentary on Cook et al. on Dog Jealousy. Anim. Sentience 2018, 3, 17.
  41. Su, B.; Koda, N.; Martens, P. How Japanese companion dog and cat owners’ degree of attachment relates to the attribution of emotions to their animals. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190781.
  42. McConnell, A.R.; Brown, C.M.; Shoda, T.M.; Stayton, L.E.; Martin, C.E. Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 101, 1239.
  43. Butterfield, M.E.; Hill, S.E.; Lord, C.G. Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 48, 957–960.
  44. Vink, L.; Dijkstra, A. The Psychological Processes Involved in the Development of a High-Quality Relation with one’s Dog. Hum.-Anim. Interact. Bull. 2019, 7, 38–57.
  45. Grigg, E.K.; Kogan, L.R. Owners’ Attitudes, Knowledge, and Care Practices: Exploring the Implications for Domestic Cat Behavior and Welfare in the Home. Animals 2019, 9, 978.
  46. Humphrey, N. Consciousness Regained; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1983.
  47. Serpell, J.A. Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the ‘Cute Response’. Soc. Anim. 2002, 10, 437–454.
  48. Aldous, J. Family Careers: Developmental Change in Families; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  49. Albert, A.; Bulcroft, K. Pets and urban life. Anthrozoös 1987, 1, 9–25.
  50. Le Roux, M.C.; Wright, S. The relationship between pet attachment, life satisfaction, and perceived stress: Results from a South African online survey. Anthrozoös 2020, 33, 371–385.
  51. Winefield, H.R.; Black, A.; Chur-Hansen, A. Health effects of ownership of and attachment to companion animals in an older population. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2008, 15, 303–310.
  52. Branson, S.M.; Boss, L.; Padhye, N.S.; Gee, N.R.; Trötscher, T.T. Biopsychosocial factors and cognitive function in cat ownership and attachment in community-dwelling older adults. Anthrozoös 2019, 32, 267–282.
  53. Ines, M.; Ricci-Bonot, C.; Mills, D.S. My Cat and Me—A Study of Cat Owner Perceptions of Their Bond and Relationship. Animals 2021, 11, 1601.
  54. Mertens, C. Human-cat interactions in the home setting. Anthrozoös 1991, 4, 214–231.
  55. Rieger, G.; Turner, D.C. How Depressive Moods Affect the Behavior of Singly Living Persons Toward their Cats. Anthrozoös 1999, 12, 224–233.
  56. Wedl, M.; Bauer, B.; Gracey, D.; Grabmayer, C.; Spielauer, E.; Day, J.; Kotrschal, K. Factors influencing the temporal patterns of dyadic behaviours and interactions between domestic cats and their owners. Behav. Processes 2011, 86, 58–67.
  57. Salonen, M.; Vapalahti, K.; Tiira, K.; Mäki-Tanila, K.; Lohi, H. Breed differences of heritable behaviour traits in cats. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7949.
  58. Lorenz, K. Die angeborenen Formen mo¨glicher Erfahrung . Z. Tierpsychol. 1943, 5, 233–519.
  59. Glocker, M.L.; Langleben, D.D.; Ruparel, K.; Loughead, J.W.; Gur, R.C.; Sachser, N. Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology 2009, 115, 257–263.
  60. Lobmaier, J.S.; Sprengelmeyer, R.; Wiffen, B.; Perrett, D.I. Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010, 31, 16–21.
  61. Foreman-Worsley, R.; Finka, L.R.; Ward, S.J.; Farnworth, M.J. Indoors or Outdoors? An International Exploration of Owner Demographics and Decision Making Associated with Lifestyle of Pet Cats. Animals 2021, 11, 253.
  62. Finka, L.R.; Ward, J.; Farnworth, M.J.; Milss, D.S. Owner personality and the wellbeing of their cats share parallels with the parent-child relationship. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211862.
  63. Weinberg, J.; Levine, S. Psychobiology of coping in animals: The effects of predictability. In Coping and Health; Levine, S., Ursin, H., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 39–59.
  64. Ellis, S.; Rodan, I.; Carney, H.C.; Heath, S.; Rochlitz, I.; Shearburn, L.D.; Sundahl, E.; Westropp, J.L. AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2013, 15, 219–230.
  65. Overgaauw, P.A.; van Zutphen, L.; Hoek, D.; Yaya, F.O.; Roelfsema, J.; Pinelli, E.; van Knapen, F.; Kortbeek, L.M. Zoonotic parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in The Netherlands. Vet. Parasit. 2009, 163, 115–122.
  66. Albert, A.; Bulcroft, K. Pets, Families, and the Life Course. J. Marriage Fam. 1988, 50, 543–552.
  67. Brown, S.E. Ethnic variations in pet attachment among students at an American school of veterinary medicine. Soc. Anim. 2002, 10, 249–266.
  68. Turner, D.C.; Bateson, P.; Bateson, P.P.G. (Eds.) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of Its Behaviour; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback