Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs): Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Nikita Chukanov.

See attached file

       Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs) are typical components of some kinds of agpaitic igneous rocks and related pegmatites and metasomatic assemblages. Crystal-chemical features of these minerals are important indicators reflecting conditions of their formation (pressure, temperature, fugacity of oxygen and volatile species, and activity of non-coherent elements.

       A unique crystal-chemical diversity of EGMs is determined by a wide variability of their chemical composition involving more than 30 main elements and complex mechanisms of homovalent, heterovalent, and, especially, blocky isomorphism involving groups of atoms having different valency and coordination. The uniqueness of these minerals lies in the fact that they exhibit ability to blocky isomorphism at several sites of high-force-strength cations belonging to the framework and at numerous sites of extra-framework cations and anions.

  • Eudialyte grpup
  • peralkaline rocks
  • isomorphism
  • crystal chemistry

Dear author, the following contents are excerpts from your papers. They are editable.

(Due to the lack of relevant professional knowledge, our editors cannot complete a complete entry by summarizing your paper, so if you are interested in this work. you may need to write some contents by yourself. A good entry will better present your ideas, research and results to other scholars. Readers will also be able to access your paper directly through entries.)

1. Introduction

Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs) are typical components of some kinds of agpaitic igneous rocks and related pegmatites and metasomatic assemblages. Crystal-chemical features of these minerals are important indicators reflecting conditions of their formation (pressure, temperature, fugacity of oxygen and volatile species, and activity of non-coherent elements [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]).
A unique crystal-chemical diversity of EGMs is determined by a wide variability of their chemical composition involving more than 30 main elements and complex mechanisms of homovalent, heterovalent, and, especially, blocky isomorphism involving groups of atoms having different valency and coordination. The uniqueness of these minerals lies in the fact that they exhibit ability to blocky isomorphism at several sites of high-force-strength cations belonging to the framework and at numerous sites of extra-framework cations and anions.
According to the recommendation of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature, and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association [3], the general formula of EGMs is 

       According to the recommendation of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature, and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association [1], the general formula of EGMs is

N

1

3N

2

3N

3

3N

4

3N

5

3M

1

6M

2

3–6M

3

M

4

Z3

(Si

24

O

72

4–6X2

. In this formula, most symbols denote split sites (i.e., groups of closely spaced sites). The “rigid” part of the structures of eudialyte-type minerals (

) is a 3D quasi-framework consisting of the 

IV

Si

3

O

9

IV

Si

9

O

27

, and 

VIM

1

6

O

24

 rings (

M

1 = Ca, Mn

2+

, Fe

2+

, Na, 

Ln

, Y, Sr; coordination numbers are denoted by Roman numerals) connected via 

M

2O

4–7

 polyhedra and 

Z

O

6

 octahedra (

M

2 = Fe

2+

, Fe

3+

, Mn

2+

, Mn

3+

, Mg, Zr, Ta, Na; 

Z

 = Zr, Ti, Nb) and containing additional 

M

3 and 

M

4 sites which are situated at the centers of two nonequivalent Si

9

O

27

 rings and can be occupied by 

IV

Si, 

VI

Nb, 

VI

Ti, and 

VIW, as well as subordinate Al, Na, and other components whose charges vary from +1 to +6 [1,2] (

W, as well as subordinate Al, Na, and other components whose charges vary from +1 to +6 [2][3] (

). In the structures of most EGMs, including eudialyte 

s.s

., 

M

1 cations can be disordered, but in some representatives of this mineral group they alternate in the ring of octahedra, which results in its transformation into the ring (

M

1.1

3M

1.2

3

O

24

) and symmetry lowering from the space group 

R

3

m

 or 

R

-3

m

 to 

R

3. In some samples, a splitting of the 

M1 site [10] or one of the 

1 site [4] or one of the

M

1.1/

M1.2 sites [11] into two sub-sites located at short distance of ~0.2 Å from each other takes place. The 

1.2 sites [5] into two sub-sites located at short distance of ~0.2 Å from each other takes place. The 

M

1–

M4 sites are considered as the main species-defining “key sites” in the nomenclature of EGMs [3,6,7,12,13].

4 sites are considered as the main species-defining “key sites” in the nomenclature of EGMs [1][6][7][8][9].

Figure 1.

 Arrangement of key sites in the eudialyte-type structures viewed along (210).

Extra-framework cations (Na

       Extra-framework cations (Na

+

, K

+

, Ca

2+

, Mn

2+

, Sr

2+

, Ba

2+

, Pb

2+

, Y

3+

Ln3+

, and H

3

O

+

) and (in some samples) water molecules occupy five sites, 

N

1–

N

5, which are typically split and can be partly vacant. Cations other than Na

+

 show a tendency to concentrate at the 

N

3 and 

N

4 sites. Some of these cations (K

+

, Ca

2+

, Mn

2+

, Sr

2+

, Ce

3+

, and H

3

O

+

) are species-defining ones in several representatives of the eudialyte group. The Ø anions (Ø = O, OH) coordinate the 

M

2, 

M

3, and 

M

4 sites. Additional anions (Cl

, F

, OH

, S

2−

, SO

42−

, and CO

32−

) and water molecules occur at the 

X

1 and 

X

2 sites located on the three-fold axis.

Blocky isomorphism is defined as the ability of groups of atoms or ions having different configurations to replace each other in crystal structures [14]. Such substitutions are known for a large number of alkaline zircono- and titanosilicates [9]. In EGMs this kind of isomorphism is realized at the key sites 

       Blocky isomorphism is defined as the ability of groups of atoms or ions having different configurations to replace each other in crystal structures [10]. Such substitutions are known for a large number of alkaline zircono- and titanosilicates [11]. In EGMs this kind of isomorphism is realized at the key sites

M

2, 

M

3, and 

M

4, as well as at the 

N

 and 

X

 sites. The eudialyte group is the only group of minerals in which blocky isomorphism is realized at several sites containing high-force-strength cations. Below we will use the symbols 

N

1–

N

5, 

M

2, 

M

3, 

M

4, and 

X

 to denote corresponding cavities (i.e., micro-regions which can contain several closely spaced sites).

In addition to EGMs with the rhombohedral unit-cell parameters 

       In addition to EGMs with the rhombohedral unit-cell parameters

a

 ~ 14.2 Å, 

c

 ~ 30 Å, members of the eudialyte group with modular structures and doubled 

c parameter are known. Their unit cells contain two eudialyte-type modules which differ from each other by local situations around key sites [4].

parameter are known. Their unit cells contain two eudialyte-type modules which differ from each other by local situations around key sites [12].

References

  1. Johnsen, O.; Ferraris, G.; Gault, R.A.; Grice, J.D.; Kampf, A.R.; Pekov, I.V. The nomenclature of eudialyte group minerals. Canad. Mineral. 2003, 41, 785–794.
  2. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Chukanov, N.V.; Aksenov, S.M. Minerals of Eudialyte Group: Crystal Chemistry, Properties, Genesis; University of Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, 2012; p. 230. ISBN 978-5-91326-207-3.
  3. Johnsen, O.; Grice, J.D.; Gault, R.A. The crystal chemistry of the eudialyte group. Canad. Mineral. 1999, 37, 865–891.
  4. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Chukanov, N.V.; Lisitsin, D.V. New data on the isomorphism in eudialyte-group minerals. IX. Blocky isomorphism in key sites. Crystal structure of a Fe-deficient eudialyte from the Khibiny Massif. Cryst. Rep. 2021, 66. in press.
  5. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Chukanov, N.V. New data on the isomorphism in eudialyte-group minerals. X. Crystal structure of an intermediate member of the raslakite–sergevanite solid-solution series. Cryst. Rep. 2021, 66. in press.
  6. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Chukanov, N.V. Classification of eudialyte-group minerals. Geol. Ore Depos. 2012, 54, 487–497.
  7. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Chukanov, N.V.; Aksenov, S.M. Crystalchemical principles of classifying the Eudialyte group. In Proceedings of the 35th International Geological Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 27 August–4 September 2016; p. 4193.
  8. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Aksenov, S.M.; Chukanov, N.V. New data on crystal chemistry of eudialyte-group minerals. In Proceedings of the XIX International Meeting on Crystal Chemistry, X-ray Diffraction and Spectroscopy of Minerals, Apatity, Russia, 2–8 July 2019; p. 81.
  9. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Aksenov, S.M.; Chukanov, N.V. New data on the crystal chemistry and systematics of minerals of eudialyte group. Cryst. Probl. 2019, 7, 192–202. (In Russian)
  10. Solodovnikov, S.F. Main Terms and Conceptions of Structural Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry; Institute of Inorganic Chemistry: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2005; p. 114.
  11. Khomyakov, A.P. Mineralogy of Ultra-Agpaitic Alkaline Rocks; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1990; p. 196.
  12. Rastsvetaeva, R.K.; Khomyakov, A.P. Crystal chemistry of modular eudialytes. Cryst. Rep. 2003, 48, S78–S90.
More