MicroRNAs in Major Depressive Disorder: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Catalin Marian and Version 5 by Jason Zhu.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder with an increasing incidence and a 2–20% prevalence in the worldwide general population, being the leading cause of disability around the world. A significant decrease in life quality, functional impairment, and other psychosocial aspects, as well as comorbidities are associated with MDD, among others.

  • major depressive disorder
  • microRNAs
  • biomarkers
  • antidepressant treatment

1. Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder with an increasing incidence and a 2–20% prevalence in the worldwide general population [1], being the leading cause of disability around the world [2]. A significant decrease in life quality, functional impairment, and other psychosocial aspects, as well as comorbidities are associated with MDD, among others. What is more, a high degree of disability, morbidity, and mortality by suicide (suicidal ideation) causes MDD to be considered a major public health concern in developed countries [3].

Although tremendous efforts have been made in order to better understand and characterize this debilitating illness, current knowledge regarding MDD pathophysiology and neurobiology have failed to completely elucidate its molecular particularities to a greater extent. As a consequence, about 40% of patients with MDD do not respond to antidepressant treatment (AD) and eventually become treatment-resistant as the disease burden increases [4]. In addition, although being diagnosed at relatively early ages in a somewhat efficient fashion, the lack of uniform and accurate diagnostic tools (biomarkers) may lead to difficulties in assessing the differences between MDD and other etiologically related diseases, such as bipolar disorder (BD) [5]. Performing the Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11) as the gold standard diagnostic criterion applied to patients was shown to induce interviewer bias, especially if performed by only one health specialist, which might lead to misdiagnosis in many cases [6]. Moderate reliability has been attributed to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders as well (SCID-I) [7][8][9][7,8,9].

To date, it is known that MDD patients suffer multiple alterations in different regions of the brain, compared to healthy subjects. Studies have shown that qualitatively, synaptic circuits and neural, functional, and structural plasticity are steadily impaired, while connectivity between different brain regions is disrupted. The latter affects communication between subcortical areas involved in modulating negative emotions, the frontal lobe with other brain regions, ultimately affecting cognition, memory, and learning [10][11][12][10,11,12]. Evidence reveals that MDD subjects present a smaller hippocampal volume, a modified morphology (number and shape) of dendrites, and the atrophy of neurons [13][14][15][16][17][18][13,14,15,16,17,18].

2. RMatesearch Articlerials and Methods

All research articles included in this study were retrieved by two interrdependent investigators by interrogating the PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and DirectScience databases (up to 20 of March 2021) with the following combination of key words: (“depression” or “depressive disorder”), and (“microRNA” or “miR”), and (“blood compartments”), and (“diagnosis”), and (“treatment” or “antidepressant treatment” or “antidepressant” or “therapy”), and (“biomarker”). The references from the articles of interest were analyzed to identify other relevant reports.

Research articles’ inclusion criteria were: (1) case-control studies in human subjects on depression assessing miRs’ expression level, with or without AD, (2) studies evaluating the diagnostic potential of different miRs in MDD, (3) MDD diagnosed based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), (4) a control group consisting of healthy subjects, and (5) published in the English language.

Research articles’ exclusion criteria were: (1) studies not conducted on human subjects, (2) studies assessing miR expression in body fluids other than blood, (3) nonoriginal papers, such as conference abstracts, letters to editors, and reviews, (4) duplicate studies, and (5) papers not written in the English language.

ResearchWers further considered for analysis only research articles that presented data related to the screening and validation of miRs in MDD from blood compartments (whole blood, serum, total plasma (TP) , plasma exosomes, exosome-depleted plasma (EDP), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)). Extracellular vesicle (EV)-entrapped miRs, such as in exosomes, have also been explored as sources of biomarkers for MDD.

3. CurrTablent Studies

Table 1 presents for each study the sample size (number of cases/controls), the blood compartment used for the analyses (some authors did not specify this), and miR findings and expression (upregulated, downregulated, or unchanged miRs) in depressive patients compared to healthy controls.

Table 1.
miRs’ expression in different blood compartments of patients with MDD compared to healthy controls.
Study (Year, Reference No) Patients Controls Blood Compartment Upregulated miRs Downregulated miRs Unchanged miRs Total
Belzeaux et al., 2012 [19]Belzeaux et al., 2012 [32] 16 13 PBMCs miR-107

miR-133a

miR-148a

miR-425-3p

miR-494

miR-579

miR-652

miR-941

miR-589
miR-200c

miR-381

miR-571

miR-636

miR-1243
- 9 upregulated, 5 downregulated
Li YJ et al., 2013 [20]Li YJ et al., 2013 [33] 40 40 Serum miR-132

miR-182
- - 2 upregulated
Fan et al., 2014 [21]Fan et al., 2014 [34] 81 46 PBMCs miR-26b

miR-1972

miR-4485

miR-4498

miR-4743
- - 5 upregulated
Li J et al., 2015 [22]Li J et al., 2015 [35] 18 18 Whole blood miR-644

miR-450b

miR-328

miR-182
miR-335

miR-583

miR-708a

miR-650

miR-654a
miR-541

miR-663

miR-578
4 upregulated, 5 downregulated, 3 unchanged
Camkurt et al., 2015 [23]Camkurt et al., 2015 [36] 50 41 Plasma miR-451a

miR-17-5p

miR-223-3p
miR-320a miR-25-3p

miR-126-3p

miR-16-5p

miR-93-5p
3 upregulated, 1 downregulated, 4 unchanged
Wan et al., 2015 [24]Wan et al., 2015 [37] 38 27 Serum let-7d-3p

miR-34a-5p

miR-221-3p

miR-125a-5p

miR-30a-5p

miR-29b-3p

miR-10a-5p

miR-375

miR-155–5p

miR-33a-5p

miR-139–5p
miR-451a

miR-15b-5p

miR-106-5p

miR-590-5p

miR-185-5p
- 11 upregulated, 5 downregulated
Wang X et al., 2015 [25]Wang X et al., 2015 [38] 169 52 Plasma - miR-144-5p - 1 downregulated
Mafioletti et al., 2016 [26]Mafioletti et al., 2016 [39] 20 20 Peripheral venous blood hsa-miR-199a-5p

hsa-miR-24-3p

hsa-miR-425-3p

hsa-miR-29c-5p

hsa-miR-330-3p

hsamiR-345-5p
hsa-let-7a-5p

hsa-let-7d-5p

has-let-7f-5p

has-miR-1915-3p
hsa-miR-720

hsa-miR-140-3p

hsa-miR-1973

hsa-miR-30d-5p

hsa-miR-3158-3p

hsa-miR-330-5p

hsa-miR-378a-5p

hsa-miR-1915-5p

hsa-miR-1972

hsa-miR-21-3p

hsa-miR-4521

hsa-miR-4793-3p

hsa-miR-4440
6 upregulated, 4 downregulated, 13 unchanged
Sun et al., 2016 [27]Sun et al., 2016 [40] 32 32 Peripheral blood leukocytes miR-34b-5p

miR-34c-5p
- miR-369–3p

miR-381

miR-107
2 upregulated, 3 unchanged
He et al., 2016 [28]He et al., 2016 [41] 32 30 PBMCs miR-124 - - 1 upregulated
Roy et al., 2017 [29]Roy et al., 2017 [42] 18 17 Serum miR-124-3p - - 1 upregulated
Kuang et al., 2018 [30]Kuang et al., 2018 [43] 84 78 Serum miR-34a-5p

miR-221-3p
miR-451a - 2 upregulated, 1 downregulated
Fang Y et al., 2018 [31]Fang Y et al., 2018 [44] 45 32 Plasma miR-124

miR-132
- - 2 upregulated
Gheysarzadeh et al., 2018 [32]Gheysarzadeh et al., 2018 [45] 39 36 Serum - miR-16

miR-135a

miR-1202
- 3 downregulated
Hung et al., 2019 [33]Hung et al., 2019 [46] 84 43 PBMCs miR-21-5p

miR-145

miR-223
miR-146a

miR-155

let-7e
- 3 upregulated, 3 downregulated

Table 2 shows the sample characteristics for each study investigating miRs before and after AD in MDD patients, the blood compartment used for the analyses, and miR findings and expression level changes in depressive patients, before and after AD.

Table 2.
miR changes in expression levels before and after antidepressant (AD) treatment.
Study Patients AD Treatment and Duration Blood Compartment Upregulated miRs Downregulated miR Unchanged miRs Total
Enatescu et al., 2016 [34]Enatescu et al., 2016 [30] 5 Escitalopram 12 weeks Plasma miR-1193

miR-3173-3p

miR-3154

miR-129-5p

miR-3661

miR-1287

miR-532-3p

miR-2278

miR-3150a-3p

miR-3909

miR-937

miR-676

miR-489

miR-637

miR-608

miR-4263

miR-382

miR-3691-5p

miR-375

miR-433

miR-1298

miR-1909

miR-1471
miR-99b

miR-151-5p

miR-223

miR-181b

miR-26a

miR-744

miR-301b

miR-27a

miR-24

miR-146a-

miR-146b-5p

miR-126

miR-151-3p

let-7d

miR-221

miR-125a-5p

miR-652
- 23 upregulated, 17 downregulated
Li J et al., 2015 [22]Li J et al., 2015 [35] 18 Citalopram, 1 week Whole blood miR-335 - - 1 upregulated
Wang X et al., 2015 [25]Wang X et al., 2015 [38] 169 Not mentioned, 8 weeks Plasma miR-144-5p

miR-30a-5p
- - 2 upregulated
He et al., 2016 [28]He et al., 2016 [41] 32 Venlafaxine (N = 7), paroxetine (N = 7), fluoxetine (N = 3), escitalopram (N = 11), duloxetine (N = 1), sertraline (N = 3), mirtazapine (N = 2) PBMCs - miR-124 - 1 downregulated
Kuang et al., 2018 [30]Kuang et al., 2018 [43] 84 Paroxetine 8 weeks Serum miR-34a-5p

miR-221a-3p
miR-451a - 2 upregulated, 1 downregulated
Fang Y et al., 2018 [31]Fang Y et al., 2018 [44] 32 Citalopram 8 weeks Plasma miR-124 miR-132 - 1 upregulated, 1 downregulated
Hung YY et al., 2019 [33]Hung YY et al., 2019 [46] 84 Not mentioned, 4 weeks PBMCs miR-146a

miR-155

let-7e
- - 3 upregulated
Bocchio-Chiavetto et al., 2013 [35]Bocchio-Chiavetto et al., 2013 [47] 10 Escitalopram 10 weeks Whole blood miR-130b

miR-505

miR-29b-2

miR-26b

miR-22

miR-26a

miR-64

miR-494

let-7d

let-7g

let-7e

let-7f

miR-629

miR-106b

miR-103

miR-191

miR-128

miR-502-3p

miR-374b

miR-132

miR-30d

miR-500

miR-589

miR-183

miR-574-3p

miR-140-3p

miR-335

miR-361-5p
miR-34c-5p

miR-770-5p
- 26 upregulated, 2 downregulated
Zhang et al., 2014 [36]Zhang et al., 2014 [48] 20 Venlafaxine, sertraline, mirtazapine 6 weeks PBMCs - miR-1972

miR-4485

miR-4498

miR-4743
miR-26b 4 upregulated, 1 downregulated
Lopez et al., 2017 [37]Lopez et al., 2017 [49] 23 Escitalopram 8 weeks Peripheral blood miR-1202 - - 1 upregulated
Lin CC et al., 2018 [38]Lin CC et al., 2018 [50] 33 Not mentioned, 4 weeks Whole blood miR-16

miR-183

miR-212
- - 3 upregulated

Interestingly, the majority of miRs studies changed their expression pattern after AD treatment, but some maintained their expression level. This is the case of miR-494, -589, -26b, -34a-5p, -124, and -132, which remained upregulated even after treatment, while miR-451a remained downregulated after treatment.

4. Discussion

Mounting evidence suggests that a tremendous number of miR species possess a dysregulated expression pattern in MDD patients relative to healthy controls. miR-132 was among the top-ranked upregulated miRs within the studies, with evidence demonstrating its direct involvement in the pathophysiology of MDD. Animal studies have shown that the increase in miR-132 expression negatively correlated with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression and that inhibiting miR-132 leads to an increase in BDNF expression and to the reduction of depression symptoms. Moreover, a high miR-132 expression level leads to short-term memory and learning impairment [20][33].

In addition, some miRs kept their expression levels constant even after administration of AD treatment (let-7e, miR-183, and miR-335); however, contradictory studies exist, and their exact role in MDD etiopathogenesis is yet to be understood [39][40][51,52].