Salivary XIST expression and morbidity risk of OSCC: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jason Zhu and Version 1 by Yin-Hwa Shih.

Studies have shown that there is a disparity between males and females in south-east Asia with regard to oral cancer morbidity. XIST may play an important role in oral cancer morbidity when associated with sex. Lack of salivary lncRNA XIST expression was associated with an increased risk of OSCC. 

  • long non-coding RNA XIST
  • oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • salivary biomarker
  • morbidity rate

L1. Introduction



According to global statistics published by the World Health Organization, oral cavity cancer is among the most prevalent types of cancer worldwide, with the female to male incidence ratio showing a discrepancy of 2:1 in south-east Asia [1]. Excessive alcohol consumption, betel quid chewing, and cigarette smoking (ABC habits) are risk factors for oral cancer [2]. However, the ABC habits cannot explain the increasing trend of young females diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) without performing the ABC habits [3].

The long non-coding RNA XIST is an X-linked gene that contributes to X-chromosome inactivation. It is also related to tumorigenesis and progression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [4], small intestinal adenocarcinoma [5], and breast cancer [6]. A previous study revealed that a loss of genomic copy number variants of XIST is shown in the OSCC group [7]. Recently, one research article provided evidence of a relationship between XIST and the inhibition of tumor progression in vitro [8].

2. RThe Charactesulristics of Participants



2.1. The Characteristics of Participants



Among the 102 participants, 59 were patients with OSCC (male n = 33, female n = 26) and 43 were individuals without OSCC (the control group) (male n = 16, female n = 27). The average ages of male and female patients were 53.9 (2.2) and 58.2 (2.3) years old, respectively. The average ages of male and female individuals in the control group were 49.7(2.5) and 39.1(1.3) years old, respectively. Salivary lncRNA XIST was only expressed in females. Among the OSCC group, 35.6% consumed alcohol, 40.7% had a betel nut chewing habit, and 52.5% smoked cigarettes. For primary tumors, 47.5% of cases were T1-T2, and 52.5% were T3-T4. Additionally, 50.8%, 40.7%, and 8.5% of tumors were well, moderately, and poorly differentiated, respectively. For clinical stages, 35.6% of cases were I-II, and 64.4% were III-IV. Only two patients (3.4%) had distant metastasis. No patients showed tumor recurrence. The tumor sites involved were 28.8% buccal, 33.9% tongue, and 37.3% others, including gingiva, floor of the mouth, mandible, and palate (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of 102 participants.
 OSCC n = 59Control n = 43
Average age, y (mean ± SD)  
Male53.9 ± 2.249.7 ± 2.5
Female58.2 ± 2.339.1 ± 1.3
Variablen (%)n (%)
Sex  
Male33 (55.9)16 (37.2)
Female26 (44.1)27 (62.8)
Salivary lncRNA XIST expression  
Male00
Female3 (11%)22 (81%)
Alcohol drinking  
Yes21 (35.6)0 (0)
No38 (64.4)43 (100)
Betel nut chewing  
Yes24 (40.7)0 (0)
No35(59.3)43 (100)
Cigarette smoking  
Yes31 (52.5)0 (0)
No28(47.5)43 (100)
Primary tumor stage  
T1-T228 (47.5) 
T3-T431 (52.5) 
Differentiation  
Well30 (50.8) 
Moderate24 (40.7) 
Poor5 (8.5) 
Clinical stage  
I-II21 (35.6) 
III-IV38 (64.4) 
Distant metastasis (M)  
Yes2 (3.4) 
No57 (96.6) 
Recurrence  
Yes0 (0) 
No59 (100) 
Tumor site  
Buccal17 (28.8) 
Tongue20 (33.9) 
Others22 (37.3) 



2.2. Salivary lncRNA XIST Was Expressed Only in Females



3. Salivary lncRNA XIST Was Expressed Only in Females



 A preliminary test to detect XIST expression in buccal cells and saliva, samples of which were kindly provided by four healthy research assistants (two males and two females) was conducted. Of the volunteers, two males and one female did not express XIST in the buccal cells or in the saliva (data shown in Supplementary Figure S1). Salivary lncRNA XIST was only expressed in females, with a high proportion observed in control group females (Table 1, Figure 1). Control group and OSCC males lacked salivary XIST expression with detectable GAPDH amplicons (data shown in Supplementary Figure S2).

Jcm 10 04622 g001 550

Figure 1. The salivary lncRNA XIST expression in female participants: (A) the amplicons and Ct value of XIST and GAPDH among females with OSCC (n = 26). The dotted line circles the subjects who express salivary XIST. Only 3 females with OSCC showed positive expression. (B) The amplicons and Ct value of XIST and GAPDH among females without OSCC (n = 27). The solid line circles the subject who lacks salivary XIST amplicons. Five control group females showing negative expression.



The grouping gels, which were cropped from different part of the same gel, or from different gels, were shown with a space. The original full-length gels were included in the supplementary files during peer review process.



2.3. Clinical–Pathological Data Difference between Sex among Patients with OSCC



4. Clinical–Pathological Data Difference between Sex among Patients with OSCC

Among the patients with OSCC, 83% (20 of 24) of the smokers, 90.3% (28 of 31) of those who consumed alcohol, and 95% (20 of 21) of those chewed betel nuts were male. Tumors of male patients were low-grade or well differentiated in 66% (22 of 33) of cases, and most were in the buccal site (13 of 33). A higher proportion of tumors in female patients showed moderate or poor differentiation (17 of 26), and most were on the tongue (14 of 26) (Table 2). Most females with OSCC did not have ABC habits. The tumor was typically small and poorly differentiated when located in the tongue. Most males with OSCC had ABC habits, and the tumors were typically located in the buccal site, were larger, and well differentiated.

Table 2. The significant difference of clinical characteristics between sexes among OSCC patients.
 Sex 
VariableMale

n = 33
Female

n = 26
p
Smoking   
Yes204<0.001 ***
No1322 
Alcohol drinking   
Yes283<0.001 ***
No523 
Betel nut chewing   
Yes201<0.001 ***
No1325 
Differentiation   
Low grade or well2290.019 *
moderate or poor1117 
Diagnosis   
Tongue Ca.6140.026 *
Buccal Ca.134 
Gingiva Ca.75 
Others73 



2.4. Increased Risk of OSCC in Individuals without Salivary lncRNA XIST Expression



5. Increased Risk of OSCC in Individuals without Salivary lncRNA XIST Expression

Study analyzed the correlation between the clinical–pathological data and XIST expression. Salivary lncRNA XIST expression was correlated with sex (Table 1 and Table 3) among all participants, and was correlated with OSCC among female participants (Table 4). Salivary lncRNA XIST expression had no significant correlation with ABC habits or death. We further conducted binomial logistic regression, and found that individuals who did not express XIST had a 19.5-fold higher risk of suffering from OSCC. Females who did not express salivary lncRNA XIST had a 33.7-fold higher risk of suffering from OSCC (Table 5). The ROC analysis showed that, 73% (acceptable discrimination) of the time, the model would correctly assign a higher absolute OSCC risk to patient with an absence of XIST expression (Figure 2).

Figure 2. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the lack of salivary XIST expression to morbidity prediction of OSCC. Blue line: XIST expression. Green line: reference.
Table 3. The correlation and significant difference between XIST expression and clinical pathological data among OSCC patients.
 SexAlcoholBetelCigaretteDeath
XIST expressionFMNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Yes3030302130
No23332531352133233818
Fishe’s exact test

p (two-tailed)
0.080.10.54610.546
Phi0.261 *0.2440.1720.0350.153

 

Table 4. The XIST expression and the correlation of OSCC among females (n = 53).
 OSCCAlcoholBetel NutCigarette
XIST expressionNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Yes223250250241
No523253271253
Fisher exact test

p (two-tail)
<0.0010.23810.613
Phi0.7 ***0.2310.1310.127

 

Table 5. Binomial logistic regression of OSCC.
 BS.E.pOR
All Participants

n = 102
XIST expression2.9730.667<0.00119.556
constant−1.9920.6150.0010.136
Female subjects

n = 53
XIST expression3.5180.789<0.00133.733
constant−1.9920.6150.0010.136



A patient who lacks salivary XIST expression will have a higher predicted OSCC risk score than a patient with salivary XIST expression. The model will correctly assign a higher absolute OSCC risk to a patient with an absence of XIST expression 73% (acceptable discrimination) of the time.

36. Conclusions

A lack of salivary lncRNA XIST expression is associated with an increased risk of OSCC. ROC analysis reveals that salivary lncRNA XIST expression is an acceptable predictor of the risk of developing OSCC.